October 2021 — Revd-101921OCIDA-Board-Regular-Packet.pdf ======================================================== ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 333 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 130, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 PHONE: 315.435.3770  FAX: 315.435.3669  ONGOVED.COM Meeting Agenda October 19, 2021 8:00 AM Call to Order the Meeting of the Audit Committee 8:05 AM Call to Order the Meeting of the Finance Committee 8:10 AM Call to Order the Meeting of the Agency A. Approval of Minutes-September 14 , 2021 B. Treasurer’s Report C. Payment of Bills D. Conflict of Interest Action Items 1. DL Manufacturing, Inc. / Metz Properties LLC (3101-21-04A) Second Meeting DL Manufacturing, Inc. and Metz Properties LLC are proposing an expansion to their current facility for warehousing and manufacturing in the Town of Cicero. The applicant is requesting exemption from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes. Representative: Joseph Markert, President and Owner, DL Manufacturing 2. TreyJay LOSO, LLC (3101-21-6A) Second Meeting TreyJay LOSO, LLC is proposing to develop a 13 individual apartment building complex that will house 248apartment units (one and two bedroom) on Oneida Lake in the Town of Cicero. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording tax. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A resolution of the Board authorizing exemptions from certain sales and use taxes. c. A resolution of the Board authorizing exemptions from mortgage recording taxes. d. A resolution of the Board authorizing exemptions from real property taxes. Representative: James Breuer, Manager, Hueber-Breuer Page 1 3. SSC Cicero LLC (3101-21-02B) Second Meeting SSC Cicero LLC is proposing to construct a 5 mega-watt solar project in the Town of Cicero. The applicant is requesting exemptions from real property taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain real property taxes. Representative: John Switzer, Managing Member, Summit Solar Capitol, LLC 4. NYCANNA, LLC (3101-21-14A) Initial Meeting NYCANNA, LLC is proposing to expand their facility with an expansion of 56,834 square feet of space. The facility is located in the Town of Dewitt (Village of East Syracuse). Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board declaring intent to be the lead agency for purposes of a coordinated review pursuant to SEQRA. b. A resolution of the Board authorizing a public hearing. Representative: William Lettier, General Manager, NYCANNA, LLC 5. RPNY Solar 5, LLC (3101-21-13A) Initial Meeting RPNY Solar 5, LLC is proposing a 1.6 MW Solar energy system farm located on 6.95 acres in the Town of Manlius. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes and mortgage recording taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board authorizing a public hearing. Representative: Brian Madigan, Project Developer, Renewable Properties 2 Page 2 6. Armoured One, LLC / North Midler Properties, LLC (3101-18-06A) Meeting to Modify Request for execution and delivery of Mortgages and Conditional Assignment of Leases and Rents with respect to a refinancing Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board authorizing execution and delivery of documents. Representative: Samantha Podlas, Legal Counsel, Barclay Damon 7. Hindsdale Road Group, LLC (3101-13-05B/3101-19-11C) Meeting to Modify Request for execution and delivery of a Ground Lease Mortgage Recognition Agreement with respect to a refinancing Agency Action Requested: a. Resolution of the Board authorizing execution and delivery of documents. Representative: Samantha Podlas, Legal Counsel, Barclay Damon 8. The Landings at Meadowood Apartments Owner KOFP LLC (f/k/a Morgan B-ville Apartments, LLC) (3101-15-09A) Meeting to Modify Request for execution and delivery of a Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement with respect to a refinancing Agency Action Requested: a. Resolution of the Board authorizing execution and delivery of documents Representative: Samantha Podlas, Legal Counsel, Barclay Damon 9. Review of Draft Agency Budget for 2022 Agency Action Requested: a. Approval of the draft Agency 2022 Budget Representative: Nate Stevens, Treasurer, OCIDA Executive Session 3 Page 3 10. Purchase Contract Execution Authorization to enter into purchase contracts for eleven parcels of property. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board authorizing the adoption of a SEQRA determination. b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the Executive Director to enter into purchase contracts and any related documents with respect to eleven parcels of property. Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA Adjourn 4 Page 4 SUBJECT TO BOARD APPROVAL Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Regular Meeting Minutes September 14, 2021 A regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 333 West Washington Street, Syracuse, New York in the large conference room on the first floor. Patrick Hogan called the meeting to order at 8:05 am with the following: PRESENT: Patrick Hogan Janice Herzog Victor Ianno Steve Morgan Susan Stanczyk Fanny Villarreal ABSENT: Kevin Ryan ALSO PRESENT: Robert M. Petrovich, Executive Director Nate Stevens, Treasurer Nancy Lowery, Secretary Karen Doster, Recording Secretary Jeff Davis, Barclay Damon Law Firm Samantha Podlas, Barclay Damon Law Firm Carolyn Evans-Dean, Office of Economic Development Rebecca Shiroff, Office of Economic Development Len Rauch, Office of Economic Development Peter Blasioli, Tracey Road Equipment, Inc. Brian Letcher, Tracey Road Equipment, Inc. Jim Gosier, Ultra Dairy James Trasher, CHA Consulting Wendy Lougnot, Ranalli Super DC, LLC David Spotts, SSC Cicero Mitch Latimer, Carpenters Local 277 Chris Bianchi (via webinar) APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – AUGUST 24, 2021 Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved the regular meeting minutes of August 24, 2021 meetings. Motion was carried. Page 5 TREASURER’S REPORT Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of August 2021. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved the Treasurer’s Report for the month of August 2021. Motion was carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Payment of Bills Schedule #461. Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved the Payment of Bills Schedule #461 for $645,027.82 and PILOT payments to City of Syracuse for $1,454.24, Onondaga County for $935.04, Town of DeWitt for $14.33, Town of Onondaga for $2.92 and Jamesville DeWitt Central School District for $93.80. Motion was carried. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE The Conflict of Interest was circulated and there were no conflicts reported. TRACEY ROAD EQUIPMENT, INC./GERALD W. TRACEY (3101-20-03B) Peter Blasioli stated Tracey Road Equipment is building an 18,000 square foot addition to their service shop and will be moving some sales offices to allow them to better operate and expand business. He stated they will be creating 35 jobs over the next several years. He stated obviously with the price of materials during COVID there has been a significant increase so that is why they are before the board looking for an increase in their sales and use tax exemption. Nancy Lowery stated a public hearing was held and there were no comments on this request. Susan Stanczyk asked what the project status is. Brian Letcher stated their goal is to try and enclose the building by Christmas. 2 Page 6 Steve Morgan asked if they started construction yet. Brian Letcher stated yes and they are about 30% into it. Patrick Hogan stated they are experiencing the same as everyone. Brian Letcher stated yes and they have made changes because of the lack of supplies. He stated they made modifications which cost them money just to keep it on track with the timing. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing additional financial assistance in the form of an increase in the Sales and Use Tax Exemption. Motion was carried. ULTRA DAIRY EXPANSION – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (3101-21-11H) SECOND MEETING Jim Gosier stated Ultra Dairy received preliminary approval from the Town of DeWitt for this project and a next phase. He stated the Town issued its environmental determination last week at its regular Planning Board meeting and he thinks that was the last obstacle for this Board to be able to proceed. He stated they are happy to get started on the Wastewater Treatment facility which is really the linchpin for future expansions there. He stated they are doing that hand in hand with County WEP. He stated they began construction of a force main sewer this week that is going to allow Ultra Dairy and adjoining property owners to continue expansions in that area. Jeff Davis stated the Town did proceed with their SEQR review and this is an unlisted action under SEQR however OCIDA was not identified as an involved agency at the time the Town did their review. He stated if we had been identified we would have consented to the Town being lead agency. He stated what we are doing for the resolution before the Board for SEQR purposes is also noting it is an unlisted action and in recognition of the fact that we would have been an involved agency and consented to the Planning Board’s lead agency status at the Town level, we are affirming, accepting and adopting the negative declaration issued by the Planning Board for the project. He stated we are attaching a copy of that to our resolution. Nancy Lowery stated a public hearing was held and there were no comments. 3 Page 7 Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the Ultra Dairy Expansion project. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes. RANALLI SUPER DC, LLC (3101-21-10A) SECOND MEETING Sue Stanczyk and Steve Morgan recused themselves and left meeting. James Trasher stated he is from CHA Consulting and is representing Ranalli Super DC, LLC/United Auto Supply. He stated they have gone through the approval process with the Town of Lysander for the construction of a 360,000 square foot warehouse at the intersection of 690 and Hencle Boulevard. He stated the property has been zoned industrial for years. He stated when they initially started the project it was 1,000,000 square feet. He stated Jim Ranalli started his business here 50 years ago and has grown over the northeast. He stated his expansion plans are based on online sales and there is a need for additional warehousing space. He stated he purchased the old P & C warehouse and has transformed that. He stated he constructed 100,000 sq ft facility at the old Roth Steel and this was the next in the expansion plans to keep up with the auto parts industry. He stated as part of the application there is 120+ jobs that would be created at the new facility. He stated there are DOT improvements where they have to do road widening, traffic signal, water main extension and they will provide water to the adjacent properties and sewer. He stated they have been working with the Onondaga County Department of Water and Environmental Protection for a regional pump station that would be located on the property so if future sewers were needed at the Hencle Boulevard/690 intersection, they would connect down Oswego Road. He stated this is a $48 million + project. He stated they have already commenced site work because with seasons changing quickly they needed to hit the ground and start moving. 4 Page 8 Jeff Davis asked if the site work is just clearing and grubbing type work. James Trasher stated it is clearing, grubbing and a storm water pond as well as a construction entrance and spreading of top soil. Patrick Hogan stated with going from 1,000,000 sq ft down to 360,000 square, there were plans, architects hired etc. and he imagines that is unanticipated expense. James Trasher stated they were there and ready to go for the larger facility but because of the public outcry on the size of the facility they scaled it back. He stated going through the dollars and cents of a 1,000,000 sq ft building it was $120 million so scaling it back made it simpler and easier. He stated this is the project they are proposing at this time and cannot guarantee that they won’t be back before the Board for more but at this time this satisfies the need of the tenant so they are here with the 360,000 sq ft project. Patrick Hogan asked if the project will be difficult without the PILOT. James Trasher yes. Patrick Hogan asked if they already cleared the land. James Trasher stated yes. Victor Ianno stated this is the type of project we want and these are local companies looking to do things here. He stated this is a home grown company and I am in favor of it. Patrick Hogan stated he agrees but he wanted to point out certain challenges with the pandemic and the public involvement. James Trasher stated when they started this project the price of steel was down and everything has escalated. He stated some of it is order issues because other projects have the supplies. He stated some of it is a sit and wait. He stated they are really looking to be in the ground by the winter, have construction completed within 12 months and be open a year from now. Victor Ianno stated it is a great project and he drove by the property and he thought “what is everyone complaining about, there is nothing here.” Fanny Villarreal asked what the types of jobs are. James Trasher stated they are full time management level and warehousing jobs. He stated they are $20 an hour plus benefits. 5 Page 9 Nancy Lowery stated a public hearing was held and there were 4 commenters that expressed they were not in favor of the project. She stated it was a combination of the issues around what the planning board had addressed but also that they just did not feel benefits were appropriate. She stated we did receive 3 written comments and the comments were distributed to the Board. Jeff Davis stated this is a Type 1 action and we had not been identified at the time on the SEQR EAF as an involved agency and had we received the letter we would have consented. He stated in recognition of that we are affirming, accepting and adopting the negative declaration that was issued by the Planning Board. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the Ranalli Super DC, LLC project. Susan Stanczyk and Steve Morgan recused. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes for the Ranalli Super DC, LLC project. Susan Stanczyk and Steve Morgan recused. Motion was carried. Susan Stanczyk and Steve Morgan returned to the meeting. SSC, CICERO, LLC (3101-21-02B) INITIAL MEETING David Spotts stated SSC, Cicero, LLC is constructing a 5 megawatt AC community solar facility located at 5827 McKinley Road in Cicero. He stated there is some Ag but mostly industrial currently being used for exterior construction material storage. He stated the site is about 50 acres. He stated they worked with the Town to go through the SEQR process and received letters of no objection from both the School District and the Town of Cicero. He stated they are requesting real property tax abatement. He stated it is important to note that projects like this are much less or nearly infeasible given the recent loss of NYS incentives for these types of projects so they appreciate the Agency’s consideration in bringing these projects to realty. 6 Page 10 Upon a motion by Fanny Villarreal, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the SSC, Cicero, LLC project. Motion was carried. GSPP SENTINEL HEIGHTS ROAD, LLC (3101-20-10B) MEETING TO MODIFY Jeff Davis stated this is similar to applications that have been before the Board in the past on solar matters. He stated GSPP was previously approved by the Board and they have not proceeded to a closing yet. He stated they have changed their ownership structure and they modified the actual project slightly. He stated the specific change is they are going down about 250 kilowatts AC in overall output of the project and because of the downsizing of the project the construction jobs will go from 25 full time to 10-20 full time during the construction. He stated before the Board is a resolution consenting to the sale of the membership interest and approving the amendments to the application which is a change in the overall size of the project and acreage of the project. Patrick Hogan asked if the company agreed to all the local stipulations. Jeff Davis stated yes and this is the Agency consenting to the change in ownership process. He stated this is being done pre closing with the Agency. He stated the Board is required to accept the changes prior to proceeding to a closing. Susan Stanczyk asked if the project itself has been downsized, does that affect any of the previous allocations of money for them? Jeff Davis asked Nate Stevens if it is based on the overall size of the project. Nate Stevens stated yes. Susan Stanczyk asked if it was the size of the project not the production. Jeff Davis stated there is a decrease from 3,750 kilowatts AC to 3,500 kilowatts AC. Janice Herzog asked if there needs to be certain disclosure in terms of national or international ownership and who is running and operating the facility. Jeff Davis stated due diligence is done to make sure they are an authentic business in New York so yes but not in terms of US based. He stated they are required to provide us with due diligence to review. He stated in this case as with most of the solar projects that we have, you typically have a company that comes in to start the project, get their approvals and then someone else comes in to acquire interest in the project 7 Page 11 so they can run it, own it and manage it. He stated in this case we had GSPP Holdco was the original applicant before the Board and GSPP Holdco has now entered into an agreement with GSPP Holdco II LLC and assigned, transferred and sold 100 percent of the membership interest. He stated it is switch over and change of name but down the road a lot of it is the same. Janice Herzog asked if it is mostly the same people doing this. Jeff Davis stated it depends. Samantha Podlas stated she reviews certificates of formation of the entities that are the new membership owner, the operating agreements to make the new membership owner is reflected in the operating agreement as well as the transfer assignment assumption of membership interest are reviewed as part of the due diligence prior to drafting the resolution. Janice Herzog stated we have a lot of solar projects and asked if we have a summary of where things stand and what the ownership is for the projects that we have supported. Jeff Davis stated we don’t have a standalone document but we can construct one. Janice Herzog stated they come in piece meal, then we have all these projects with ownership changes. Robert Petrovich stated we could prepare a summary of the solar projects, its size, its megawatts, where it’s located and the current ownership entity. Janice Herzog stated that would be helpful. She stated we do a lot of these projects and to have an overview would be helpful. Jeff Davis stated most IDAs across the state see this with solar projects where there is changes in ownership one or two times throughout the process unlike the typical applicant where a local company coming before the IDA; we know who they are and that they are going to build something. He stated it is kind of the nature of how that business is being developed in NY. Jeff Davis stated green energy is huge so there are entities that want to say they purchased so much of their energy from green energy. He stated they can buy into your company that invests in and say I am getting my energy through that concept. He stated a lot of larger entities in Upstate New York are looking for green energy sources so there is a market for that. Janice Herzog stated it is good but because it is a new dynamic in our community she thinks it is helpful to understand what the dynamics of it is. Robert Petrovich stated staff will put together a list and get it out to the Board. 8 Page 12 Patrick Hogan stated one of the reasons we are involved in this is because the local assessors have trouble assessing the real property. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution consenting to the sale of membership interest of the GSPP Sentinel Heights Road, LLC project applicant and approving amendments to the application. Motion was carried. ABUNDANT SOLAR POWER LLC (3101-19-11A) MEETING TO MODIFY Samantha Podlas stated similar to what was done for GSPP, it is a change of ownership interest but we closed Abundant Solar SK1 in August 2020. She stated pursuant to the lease agreement, the entity needs to come back before the Board if the membership interest changed so just like with GSPP documents were reviewed to ensure they referenced the correct membership owner as well as the transfer documentation. She stated the new membership owner is Solar Energy Fund III Partnership LLC. She stated the company is back before the Board to get consent pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement before the transfer occurs. Jeff Davis stated the only difference between Abundant and GSPP is we have already closed on Abundant Solar and they are required to get the Board’s consent. He stated this is a prerequisite before proceeding with a change in ownership. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution consenting to the sale of membership interest of a company with a current straight- lease transaction for the Abundant Solar Power LLC project. Motion was carried. EXECUTIVE SESSION Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board went into executive session at 8:51 am. Motion was carried. 9 Page 13 Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board adjourned executive session at 9:13 am. Motion was carried. PURCHASE CONTRACT EXECUTION Jeff Davis stated before the Board is a SEQR resolution with regard to the acquisition of a parcel of property at the White Pine Commerce Park. He read a summary of the resolution. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing adoption of SEQRA determination. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the Executive Director to enter into a purchase contract and any related document with respect to one parcel of property. Motion was carried. REVISED OCIDA PROJECT APPLICATION Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution adopting the revised OCIDA project application. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board adjourned the meeting at 9:17 am. Motion was carried. _________________________________ Nancy Lowery, Secretary 10 Page 14 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 333 WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 130, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 PHONE: 315.435.3770 • FAX: 315.435.3669 September 30, 2021 2021 Budget Current YTD Revenue / Expense / Income Current Period Current YTD Amount Change to Budget Operating Revenue 191,676 1,584,791 1,646,000 (61,209) Administrative Expense 55,971 386,573 1,008,000 (621,427) Operating/Program Exp. 34,726 716,008 638,000 78,008 Net Ordinary Income 100,979 482,210 - 482,210 Current Assets Current YTD Prior YTD Total Cash 5,178,465 6,596,105 Less Pass Through Received 2,420,941 1,807,097 Available Cash 2,757,524 4,789,008 Receivables (less pass through rec.) 223,524 950,524 Grant Reimbursements - 268,733 Total 2,981,048 6,008,265 Reserve for Contracts County Operations 2021 621,427 333 W. Washington St 2021 Rent 35,582 OBG WPCP CO #4 Additional Studies 336,856 JMT 800 Hiawatha Engineering 10,234 Barclay Damon WPCP Options - Total 1,004,098 Receivables 0-120 days 1,500 > 120 days 222,024 Total 223,524 Page 15 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Profit and Loss September 2021 TOTAL Income 500 Operating Revenue 2116 Fees 2116.1 Agency Fees 65,209.00 Total 2116 Fees 65,209.00 2410 Lease Income 1,500.00 Total 500 Operating Revenue 66,709.00 501 Non-Operating Revenue 2401 Interest Income 30.78 501.1 Subsidies Grants Donations 124,936.57 Total 501 Non-Operating Revenue 124,967.35 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 529 PILOT Income 1,465,645.92 Total 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 1,465,645.92 Total Income $1,657,322.27 GROSS PROFIT $1,657,322.27 Expenses 6400 Operating Expense 6406 Other Professional Services 6406.50 Consulting Services 5,000.00 Total 6406 Other Professional Services 5,000.00 6407 Administrative Expense 55,970.66 6408 Meeting Expenses 406.26 6409 Conference Attendence 837.23 6410 Office Expense 836.62 Total 6400 Operating Expense 63,050.77 6500 Agency Program Expenses 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 6510.7 WPCP Marketing 8,153.94 6511 WPCP Closing Costs 12,947.22 Total 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 21,101.16 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 6530.8 Other Professional Services 6,545.00 Total 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 6,545.00 Total 6500 Agency Program Expenses 27,646.16 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 6605.2 PILOT Expense 1,465,645.92 Total 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 1,465,645.92 Total 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 1,465,645.92 Total Expenses $1,556,342.85 NET OPERATING INCOME $100,979.42 NET INCOME $100,979.42 Page 16 Accrual Basis Friday, October 8, 2021 11:46 AM GMT-04:00 1/1 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of September 30, 2021 TOTAL ASSETS Current Assets Bank Accounts 200 Cash 0.00 200.1 Cash - M & T Checking 4,296,984.91 200.2 Cash - M & T Money Maker Savings 890,387.86 200.4 Destiny USA Restricted Cash -8,957.82 210 Petty Cash 50.00 Total 200 Cash 5,178,464.95 Total Bank Accounts $5,178,464.95 Accounts Receivable 380 Accounts Rec. 380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 157,967.71 Total 380 Accounts Rec. 157,967.71 Total Accounts Receivable $157,967.71 Other Current Assets 391 Long Tern Receivable 222,024.00 Total Other Current Assets $222,024.00 Total Current Assets $5,558,456.66 Page 17 Accrual Basis Friday, October 8, 2021 11:47 AM GMT-04:00 1/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of September 30, 2021 TOTAL Fixed Assets 100 Land 101 White Pines Commerce Park 4,455,401.50 101.1 WPCP GEIS 101.101 CHA GEIS 1 267,452.05 101.102 CHA GEIS 2 219,439.36 101.104 GEIS Reg Plan Board Overview 19,797.74 Total 101.1 WPCP GEIS 506,689.15 101.2 WPCP Legal 69,774.25 101.3 Engineering Services 52,675.00 101.301 Temporary Access 4,055.44 101.4 Environmental/Demo Services 10,318.98 Total 101.3 Engineering Services 67,049.42 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 101.501 Land Purchases 1,160,063.57 101.502 Closing Costs 3,168.14 Total 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 1,163,231.71 Total 101 White Pines Commerce Park 6,262,146.03 106 North Salina Properties 0.00 106.1 435 North Salina 17,083.55 106.3 435 North Salina Building 634,421.53 Total 106 North Salina Properties 651,505.08 107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42 Total 100 Land 7,518,491.53 104 Machinery & Equipment 104.1 Office Furniture 1,429.00 104.2 Equipment 4,588.00 Total 104 Machinery & Equipment 6,017.00 211 A/D Office Furniture -2,862.00 213 A/D Buildings -81,335.00 Total Fixed Assets $7,440,311.53 Other Assets 240 Blue Sky Redevelopment 1,641.76 Total Other Assets $1,641.76 TOTAL ASSETS $13,000,409.95 Page 18 Accrual Basis Friday, October 8, 2021 11:47 AM GMT-04:00 2/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of September 30, 2021 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Liabilities Current Liabilities Other Current Liabilities 600 Accounts Payable 0.00 600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 386,573.14 600.206 Mileage Reimbursement 92.34 600.208 BlueRock Energy Agreement Deposit 25,000.00 600.209 Syracuse Rail Overpayment 500.00 Total 600 Accounts Payable 412,165.48 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 603 PILOT Pass Thru 156,467.73 604 Other Pass Thrus 74,063.70 Total 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 230,531.43 631 Due to Other Governments 631.1 Towns 631.105 Camillus 155,219.17 Total 631.1 Towns 155,219.17 631.2 Villages 631.22 East Syracuse 21,346.86 Total 631.2 Villages 21,346.86 631.3 Schools 631.305 Baldwinsville 1,529,954.00 631.315 East Syracuse-Minoa 52,697.44 631.36 West Genesee 531,012.95 Total 631.3 Schools 2,113,664.39 631.4 Onondaga County 130,710.88 Total 631 Due to Other Governments 2,420,941.30 Total Other Current Liabilities $3,063,638.21 Total Current Liabilities $3,063,638.21 Total Liabilities $3,063,638.21 Equity 3900 Equity Unreserved 6,735,894.07 3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 2,345,838.63 463 Reserve For Contracts 1,004,098.43 465 Equity - Unreserved -631,269.43 Net Income 482,210.04 Total Equity $9,936,771.74 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $13,000,409.95 Page 19 Accrual Basis Friday, October 8, 2021 11:47 AM GMT-04:00 3/3 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILL - SCHEDULE #462 October 19, 2021 GENERAL EXPENSES 1. BARCLAY DAMON LLP* $ 181,389.50 Land Purchase 2. CENTER FOR CREATIVE LAND CONSULTING* $ 6,545.00 Inv#1, 1st Payment Roth EPA Grant Consulting 3. BARCLAY DAMON LLP** $ 331,557.72 Land Purchase 4. ONONDAGA CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. $ 15,050.07 Inv#1118 & 1119, 3rd Quarter 2021 Rent & Office Machine 5. ADVANCE MEDIA NEW YORK $ 518.72 Public Hearing Notcies; Ranalli, Stewart Hancock & Tracey Road 6. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 4,968.75 Inv#5136544, 5139992, 5139865 & 5139888, General & Roth Legal thru August 31, 2021 7. FEDEX $ 22.67 Inv#7-512-47417, Shipping 8. ROBERT PETROVICH $ 96.26 NYSEDC Annual Mileage 9. NANCY LOWERY $ 103.84 NYSEDC Annual Mileage & Tolls 10. NATE STEVENS $ 109.91 NYSEDC Annual Mileage & Tolls TOTAL $ 540,362.44 * Ratification of Checks dated September 16, 2021 ** Ratification of Check dated September 21, 2021 1 Page 20 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILL - SCHEDULE #462 October 19, 2021 PILOT Payments 1. HINSDALE ROAD GROUP, LLC* $ 525,000.00 2021 PIF Payment 2. ONONDAGA COUNTY $ 140,434.14 2021 PILOT Payments 3. TOWN OF CAMILLUS $ 155,219.17 2021 Hinsdale Road PILOT Payment 4. VILLAGE OF EAST SYRACUSE $ 21,346.86 2021 Bristol-Myers Squibb PILOT Payment 5. BALDWINSVILLE CSD $ 1,529,954.00 2021 Anhueser-Busch PILOT Payment 6. EAST SYRACUSE MINOA CSD $ 176,400.36 2021 PILOT Payments 7. WEST GENESEE CSD $ 531,012.95 2021 Hinsdale Road PILOT Payment 8. CITY OF SYRACUSE $ 8,493.64 3rd Quarter 2021 COR IH Master PILOT Payment 9. SYRACUSE CSD $ 14,547.90 3rd Quarter 2021 COR IH Master PILOT Payment TOTAL $ 3,102,409.02 *Ratification of Check dated September 23, 2021 1 Page 21 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESERVE FOR CONTRACTS 9/30/2021 CONTRACT TOTAL PORTION BALANCE DESCRIPTION TERM CONTRACT PAID OUTSTANDING ONONDAGA COUNTY OED 2021 1-1-21-12-31-21 $1,008,000.00 $386,573.14 $621,426.86 333 W. WASHINGTON ST 2021 RENT 1-1-21-12-31-21 $65,000.00 $29,418.38 $35,581.62 OBG WPCP CO #4 ADDITIONAL STUDIES 11-30-18-12-31-21 $800,000.00 $463,143.95 $336,856.05 JMT 800 HIAWATHA ENGINEERING 2/13/19-12-31-21 $25,000.00 $14,766.10 $10,233.90 BARCLAY DAMON WPCP OPTIONS 11/30/20-12-31-21 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $0.00 $2,098,000.00 $1,093,901.57 $1,004,098.43 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 9/30/2021 AGENCY FEES RECEIVABLE $0.00 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE GENERAL $1,500.00 QUASI-EQUITY LOAN RECEIVABLE $0.00 GRANTS RECEIVABLE $0.00 LONG TERM RECEIVABLE $222,024.00 TOTAL $223,524.00 Page 22 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency DRAFT Project Summary 10/8/2021 1. Project DL Manufacturing 2. Project Number - 3. Location Cicero 4. School District Cicero-North Syracuse 6. Project Type Expansion and renovation 5. Tax Parcel(s) 018.-06-01.6 Village North Syracuse 7.Total Project Cost $ 2,332,337.00 8. Total Jobs 57 Land $ - 8A. Job Retention 51 Site Work $ 349,900 8B: Job Creation 6 Building $ 1,650,100 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ 20,000 Equipment $ 80,000 Equipment Subject to NYS Production Exemption $ - Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 120,000 Financial Charges $ - Legal Fees $ 20,000 Other $ 92,337 Cost Benefit Analysis DL Manufacturing Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Estimated Abatement Cost $436,656 Sales Tax Abatement $60,000 Mortgage Recording Tax Abatement $13,125 Real Property Tax Relief $363,531 New Investment $7,111,427 PILOT Payments $1,042,808 Project Wages (10 years) $3,125,390 DL Manufacturing will be expanding by constructing a 17,000 sq.ft. building to be used for Construction Wages $293,828 manufacturing, warehousing, training and conference center. Employee Benefits (10 years) $625,078 Project Capital Investment $2,000,000 Agency Fees $24,323 Benefit:Cost Ratio 16.29 :1 Page 23 DL Manufacturing 10/8/2021 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet DRAFT for 10 years OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 1,486,000 Projected investment $ 1,650,100 OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 1,395,900 OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 2,881,900 Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 725,154 Scheduled PILOT payments $ 1,042,808 Full Tax Onondaga Cicero-North North PILOT YEAR Exemption % Cicero Total PILOT Payment w/o Net Exemption County Syracuse Syracuse PILOT 1 100% $ 7,826 $ 7,826 $ 35,523 $ 15,051 $ 66,225.75 $ 128,436 $ 62,210 2 90% $ 8,732 $ 8,732 $ 39,637 $ 16,794 $ 73,895.72 $ 131,005 $ 57,109 3 80% $ 9,672 $ 9,672 $ 43,901 $ 18,601 $ 81,846.00 $ 133,625 $ 51,779 4 70% $ 10,645 $ 10,645 $ 48,320 $ 20,474 $ 90,084.73 $ 136,297 $ 46,213 5 60% $ 11,654 $ 11,654 $ 52,899 $ 22,414 $ 98,620.26 $ 139,023 $ 40,403 6 50% $ 12,699 $ 12,699 $ 57,641 $ 24,423 $ 107,461.19 $ 141,804 $ 34,343 7 40% $ 13,781 $ 13,781 $ 62,551 $ 26,504 $ 116,616.31 $ 144,640 $ 28,024 8 30% $ 14,901 $ 14,901 $ 67,636 $ 28,658 $ 126,094.64 $ 147,533 $ 21,438 9 20% $ 16,060 $ 16,060 $ 72,898 $ 30,887 $ 135,905.47 $ 150,483 $ 14,578 10 10% $ 17,260 $ 17,260 $ 78,344 $ 33,195 $ 146,058.28 $ 153,493 $ 7,435 TOTAL $ 123,230 $ 123,230 $ 559,349 $ 237,000 $ 1,042,808 $ 1,406,339 $ 363,531 Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Jobs Current/Actuals 51 Creation Goals 6 0 4 2 Total Employment Goals 57 51 55 57 57 57 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 I.G Applicant Business Description: company’s background, products, customers, goods and services 2 I.H Percentage of your total annual supplies, raw materials and vendor services are purchased from firms in Onondaga County. 3 II.C Summary of how this project will help your business grow: 4 II.D Description of Project: 5 (i) Size of Project: 5 (ii) Size of Lot: 5 (iii) Usage of Site: 5 (iv) Principal Activities to occur at Project Site: 5 (v) Why the Applicant is undertaking the Project: 5 Site Plans/ Sketches/ Maps: 6 Page 47 I.G Applicant Business Description: company’s background, products, customers, goods and services DL Manufacturing ​was created​ in 1996 ​with the invention of the Versa Light Dock Light ​in the basement of the original owner, ​Donald Metz​. ​ ​The ​Ve​rsa​ Light improved loading docks with the use of a Halogen bulb, a major upgrade to incandescent bulbs, which reduced maintenance and provided twice as much light for workers inside the trailer. Today, we manufacture over twenty patented products for the loading dock industry. Our products are specifically designed to improve productivity, enhance safety and reduce maintenance. Each product is engineered with innovative ideas and technology by a team of locally produced engineers. Our products are sold and installed by a team of solution based sales representatives and specially trained installation crews. We are known for serving customers beyond expectations, in fact, a fortune 25 company recently referred to us as their SWAT team: if they have a problem they can’t figure out – we are the first ones they call. This consumer centric mentality is the biggest reason why companies like Walmart, Kroger, Lowe’s, Home Depot and Wegmans continue to rely on DL Manufacturing for solutions at their loading docks. Page 48 I.H Percentage of your total annual supplies, raw materials and vendor services are purchased from firms in Onondaga County. Total 33.35% Acro Fab $178,288.09 $9,500,000.00 1.88% Anthony River $4,286.10 $9,500,000.00 0.05% Business Systems $54,606.42 $9,500,000.00 0.57% Eagle Comtronics $522,276.16 $9,500,000.00 5.50% Empire Freight Logistics $332,975.70 $9,500,000.00 3.51% Express Shipping $4,095.00 $9,500,000.00 0.04% Falso Industries $1,113,304.82 $9,500,000.00 11.72% Fastenal $48,761.32 $9,500,000.00 0.51% Haun Welding $3,057.70 $9,500,000.00 0.03% Hiawatha Fasteners $1,024.51 $9,500,000.00 0.01% Ivy Service & Supply $15,451.40 $9,500,000.00 0.16% Jamestown Container $128,763.12 $9,500,000.00 1.36% Jaquith $25,927.30 $9,500,000.00 0.27% KL Electric $37,743.00 $9,500,000.00 0.40% McIntosh $212,639.16 $9,500,000.00 2.24% Murphy Nolan $160,749.85 $9,500,000.00 1.69% Net Logistics $131,877.00 $9,500,000.00 1.39% Paratore $45,457.25 $9,500,000.00 0.48% Renaissance Renovators $8,525.00 $9,500,000.00 0.09% Syracuse Business $26,294.00 $9,500,000.00 0.28% Vinyl Designs $8,099.34 $9,500,000.00 0.09% XTO $104,075.34 $9,500,000.00 1.10% equipment 8.5 million parts 1 million Page 49 II.C Summary of how this project will help your business grow: For the pas​t (4) yea​rs we have leased over 10,000 sf of offsite space for warehousing raw materials to manufacture our products. This setup is very inefficient because we have to lease a truck and transport parts two or three times per day to keep our lines running. We have also introduced new products that require additional floor space for manufacturing. As a result, we are clustered and overflowing, creating additional inefficiencies. This expansion will solve this problem. We also plan to create a training and virtual sales center. Since covid, we have struggled to get face time with customers, so we created a virtual sales call button on our website that has been successful. The additional space and video/tech capability will help us make a more robust virtual sales presentation. This expansion will set us for continued revenue growth by freeing up space in the original warehouse that can be used to manufacture future products in a safe, efficient manner. Page 50 II.D Description of Project: (i) Size of Project: Total square footage project 17,000 sq. ft. Manufacturing 6,500 sq. ft. Warehousing 9,500 sq. ft. (ii) Size of Lot: Size of Lot 43,560​ sq. ft. (iii) Usage of Site: Current Use of Site: None Intended Use of Site: Manufacturing, Warehousing, Training, Sales Meeting and Conference Center (iv) Principal Activities to occur at Project Site: This project site will be used as warehousing and manufacturing space for DL Manufacturing upon project completion. This includes our growing Knockout Door line (MxV, PxV and QxV), Fan and Truck Cooling line (AeroTec and DL Fan), and Safety Product Lines (Smart Chock and Safety Signal). We are also investing in a remote Sales Presentation Center and Training Room. Since covid we are finding ways to improve our ability to present our products to potential customers we can’t meet in person. (v) Why the Applicant is undertaking the Project: We currently use off site storage for many of our raw materials. Our expansion project will allow us to expand our growing manufacturing space and bring warehousing onsite to help make us more efficient, streamlined and productive. Page 51 Site Plans/ Sketches/ Maps: See attachments Page 52 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the  project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A. Project and  Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: DL Manufacturing Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): 340 Gateway Park Drive, North Syracuse, NY 13212 Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): Construction of a 14,000 +/- SF manufacturing and warehousing building addition. Site work includes the construction of a stormwater management facility, parking lot addition, general landscape improvements and an employee patio space. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: 315-445-7980 Scott Freeman - Keplinger Freeman Associates E-Mail: sf@keplingerfreeman.com Address: 6320 Fly Road, Suite 109 City/PO: East Syracuse State: Zip Code: NY 13057 Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: 315-463-7348 Metz Properties, LLC E-Mail: jmarkert@dlmanufacturing.com Address: 340 Gateway Park Drive City/PO: State: Zip Code: N Syracuse NY 13212 Page 1 of 13 Page 53 B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City  Town   ,  Yes  No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village  Yes  No ✔ Village of North Syracuse Planning Board & ZBA 07/16/21 Planning Board or Commission c. City Town or  Yes  No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies  Yes  No e. County agencies  Yes  No f. Regional agencies  Yes  No g. State agencies ✔  Yes  No NYSDEC Wetland Permit 1/21/21 h. Federal agencies  Yes  No ✔ Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdictional 6/10/21 Determination i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway?  Yes ✔  No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program?  Yes ✔  No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area?  Yes ✔  No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the  Yes ✔  No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? x If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. x If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site ✔  Yes  No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action  Yes  No ✔ would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway  Yes ✔  No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan,  Yes ✔  No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 13 Page 54 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance.  Yes  No ✔ If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PD - Planned Unit Development _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ✔  Yes  No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse Central School District b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse Police Department c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse Fire Department d. What parks serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Centerville Park __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? Industrial _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? _____________ 3.55 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? _____________ .89 acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _____________ 34 acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use?  Yes  No ✔ i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ 51 Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? ✔ No  Yes  If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed?  Yes  No iii. Number of lots proposed? ________ iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________  Will  proposed action be constructed in multiple phases?  Yes ✔ No  If No, anticipated period of construction: _____ months  If Yes: x Total number of phases anticipated _____ x Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year x Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year x Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 13 Page 55 f. Does the project include new residential uses?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)?  Yes  No ✔ If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ 1 ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; 20'-10" ________width; 113 and _______ 124 length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ 14000 square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any  Yes  No ✔ liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: Stormwater ________________________________________________________________________________ Best Management Practices - Storage ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water:  Ground water  Surface water streams ✔  Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Runoff iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ .18 acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ 3 height; _______ 275 length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Earth Fill D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both?  Yes ✔  No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? x Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ x Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials?  Yes  No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting?  Yes  No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment  Yes  No ✔ into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ BRE-27 State Wetland _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 Page 56 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Filling approximately .2 acres. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will  proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes ✔ No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will  proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: x a  of   vegetation proposed to be removed ___________________________________________________________ x H[SHFWHG acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion________________________________________ x purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ x if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? ✔ Yes  No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ 300 gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ✔ Yes  No If Yes: x Name of district or service area: County _________________________________________________________________________ Zone 3 Water District x Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal?  Yes  No ✔ x Is the project site in the existing district?  Yes  No ✔ x Is expansion of the district needed?  Yes ✔ No x Do existing lines serve the project site?  Yes  No ✔ iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project?  Yes ✔ No If Yes: x Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site?  Yes ✔ No If, Yes: x Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ x Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ x Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private),    maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ✔ Yes  No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ 300 gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Sanitary Wastewater _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ✔ Yes  No If Yes: x Oak Orchard Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ x Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ Onondaga County Department of Water Environment Protection x Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ✔ Yes  No x Is the project site in the existing district? ✔ Yes  No x Is expansion of the district needed?  Yes ✔  No Page 5 of 13 Page 57 x Do existing sewer lines serve the project site?  Yes  No ✔ x Will  line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project?  Yes ✔ No If Yes: x Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site?  Yes ✔ No If Yes: x Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ x Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ x What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point  Yes  No ✔ sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ .403 acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ 3.55 acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ Building Runoff _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Stormwater will be directed towards stormwater management facilities. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ x If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties?  Yes ✔ No iv. Does  proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater?  Yes ✔  No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel  Yes ✔ No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit,  Yes ✔  No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet  Yes  No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: x ___________Tons/year (   ) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) x ___________Tons/year (   ) of Nitrous Oxide (N2) x ___________Tons/year (   ) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) x ___________Tons/year (   ) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) x ___________Tons/year (   ) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflo rocarbons (H ) x ___________Tons/year (   ) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 6 of 13 Page 58 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants,  Yes ✔ No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as  Yes ✔  No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial  Yes ✔  No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): † Morning † Evening †Weekend † Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day            ! """"""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""  Parking spaces: Existing _____________"""""" Proposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________""""""""  #               $ ' * v. +0           0  0 8     0     8   9 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site?  Yes  No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric  Yes  No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing  Yes  No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand  Yes  No ✔ for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TBD ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Grid/ local utility iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade to an existing substation?  Yes ✔  No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: x Monday - Friday: _________________________ 8 AM - 5 PM x Monday - Friday: ____________________________ 6 AM - 6PM x Saturday: ________________________________ x Saturday: ___________________________________ x Sunday: _________________________________ x Sunday: ____________________________________ x Holidays: ________________________________ x Holidays: ___________________________________ Page 7 of 13 Page 59 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ✔  Yes  No operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ General construction noise will exist for the duration of the project. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will  proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ✔  Yes  No Describe: Trees _________________________________________________________________________________________________ to be cleared. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ n.Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting?  Yes  No ✔ If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Wallpack lighting will be installed on proposed building. Existing site light poles will be utilized. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ✔  Yes  No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Trees will be removed. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum ( 9  0 over 1,100 gallons)  Yes ✔  No or chemical products >@J    9 K             ? If Yes:  Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________  Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year)  Generally describe  proposed storage facilities________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides,  Yes ✔  No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices?  Yes  No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal  Yes ✔  No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: x Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) x Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: x Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: x Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 13 Page 60 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: x ________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or x ________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will  proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous  Yes ✔  No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility?  Yes  No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site.  Urban ✔  Industrial ✔  Commercial  Residential (suburban)  Rural (non-farm)  Forest  Agriculture  Aquatic ✔  Other (specify): ____________________________________ ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres +/-) x Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces 1.42 1.83 +0.41 x Forested x Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- 2.13 1.72 -0.41 agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) x Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) x Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) x Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) x Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) x Other Describe: _______________________________ ________________________________________ Page 9 of 13 Page 61 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation?  Yes  ✔ No i. If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed  Yes ✔  No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: x Dam height: _________________________________ feet x Dam length: _________________________________ feet x Surface area: _________________________________ acres x Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility,  Yes ✔  No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed?  Yes  No x If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin  Yes ✔  No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any  Yes ✔  No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site  Yes  No Remediation database? Check all that apply:  Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________  Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________  Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database?  Yes ✔  No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10 of 13 Page 62 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses?  Yes  No x If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ x Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ x Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ x Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ x Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place?  Yes  No x Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ >6 feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: Niagara Silt Loam ___________________________ 97.7 __________% Cut and Fill ___________________________ 2.3 __________% ____________________________ __________% d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ 4.5 feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: ✔  Well Drained: _____% 2.3 of ite  Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site  Poorly Drained ✔ _____% 97.7 of ite  0-10%: f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ✔ _____% 100 of site  10-15%: _____% of site  15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, ✔  Yes  No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site?  Yes  No ✔ If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ✔  Yes  No state or local agency? iv. For each identified   wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information x Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ [ Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ t Wetlands: NYS Wetland Name ____________________________________________ NYS Wetland (in a... Approximate Size ___________________ [ Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ BRE-27 v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired  Yes  ✔ No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway?  Yes ✔  No j. Is the project site in the 100\year Floodplain?  Yes ✔  No k. Is the project site in the 500\year Floodplain?  Yes ✔  No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 13 Page 63 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ Small Mammals ______________________________ Deer _______________________________ Insects ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Extent of community/habitat: x Currently: ______________________ acres x Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres x Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as  Yes ✔  No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? +0 '  ]      !"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of  Yes ✔  No special concern? +0 '  ]  """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing?  Yes ✔  No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to  Yes ✔  No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present?  Yes ✔  No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National  Yes ✔  No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark:  Biological Community  Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: i. CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 13 Page 64 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district  Yes ✔  No which is listed on  *  ] ^ of Historic P   9   9    0  *'] 00 0 `  ^    {  `  K   9 9 0    ] ^ of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource:  Archaeological Site  Historic Building or District ii. Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for  Yes ✔  No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h. + the project site  0K  0 any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local  Yes  No ✔ scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Onondaga Lake ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Scenic Lake iii. Distance between project and resource: _____________________ 4.38 miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers  Yes ✔  No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666?  Yes  No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Scott Freeman - Keplinger Freeman Assoc. 07/22/21 Date_______________________________________ 07/16/21 Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________ Landscape Architect PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 Page 65 EAF Mapper Summary Report Thursday, July 15, 2021 1:03 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Potential Contamination History] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Listed] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook. E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation No Site] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands NYS Wetland Name] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands NYS Wetland (in acres):86.5 Size] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - DEC BRE-27 Wetlands Number] E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] No E.2.i. [Floodway] No E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] No E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] No Full Environmental Page 66 Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 E.2.l. [Aquifers] No E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] No E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Places or State Eligible Sites] Workbook. E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No Full Environmental Page 67 Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency DRAFT Project Summary 3/5/2021 1. Project Trey Jay Loso, LLC 2. Project Number 3101-21-6A 3. Location Cicero 4. School District Cicero-North Syracuse 6. Project Type New Construction 5. Tax Parcel(s) 086.-02-25.1 Village - 7.Total Project Cost $ 56,650,000.00 8. Total Jobs 4 Land $ 1,500,000 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ 3,500,000 8B: Job Creation 4 Building $ 48,000,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ 400,000 Equipment $ - Equipment Subject to NYS Production Exemption $ - Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 1,100,000 Financial Charges $ 2,150,000 Legal Fees $ - Other $ - Cost Benefit Analysis Trey Jay Loso, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Estimated Abatement Cost $6,100,723 Sales Tax Abatement $2,500,000 Mortgage Recording Tax Abatement $353,700 Real Property Tax Relief $3,247,023 New Investment $71,702,762 PILOT Payments $3,088,637 Project Wages (10 years) $1,420,000 Development of a 248 unit apartment community in the Town of Cicero on 24 acres of currenly Construction Wages $13,059,000 undeveloped land with marina. Employee Benefits (10 years) $426,000 Project Capital Investment $53,000,000 Agency Fees $709,125 Benefit:Cost Ratio 11.75 :1 Page 68 DRAFT TreyJay Loso PILOT 3/5/2021 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet for 10 years OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 666,000 Projected investment $ 48,000,000 OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 16,120,000 OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 16,786,000 Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 251,373 Scheduled PILOT payments $ 3,088,637 Full Tax Onondaga Cicero-North Net PILOT YEAR Exemption % Cicero Total PILOT Payment w/o County Syracuse Exemption PILOT 1 100% $ 3,507 $ 3,529 $ 15,921 $ 22,957.04 $ 578,614 $ 555,657 2 90% $ 12,237 $ 12,312 $ 55,544 $ 80,093.17 $ 590,186 $ 510,093 3 80% $ 21,314 $ 21,445 $ 96,747 $ 139,505.56 $ 601,990 $ 462,484 4 70% $ 30,750 $ 30,938 $ 139,575 $ 201,262.42 $ 614,030 $ 412,767 5 60% $ 40,554 $ 40,802 $ 184,078 $ 265,433.74 $ 626,310 $ 360,876 6 50% $ 50,738 $ 51,049 $ 230,304 $ 332,091.42 $ 638,836 $ 306,745 7 40% $ 61,314 $ 61,689 $ 278,307 $ 401,309.22 $ 651,613 $ 250,304 8 30% $ 72,292 $ 72,734 $ 328,137 $ 473,162.91 $ 664,645 $ 191,482 9 20% $ 83,684 $ 84,197 $ 379,849 $ 547,730.21 $ 677,938 $ 130,208 10 10% $ 95,504 $ 96,088 $ 433,499 $ 625,090.95 $ 691,497 $ 66,406 TOTAL $ 471,894 $ 474,782 $ 2,141,961 $ 3,088,637 $ 6,335,660 $ 3,247,023 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 OCIDA Application Addendum TreyJay Loso, LLC Section 1G – Applicant Business Description Description of TreyJay LOSO, LLC Background: TreyJay LOSO, LLC is a single use limited liability company created solely for this project. Section 1H What percentage of Total Annual Supplies Are Coming Form firms in Onondaga County? The construction of the project will utilize a local labor force and all material suppliers will be in Onondaga County or an immediately surrounding County. Any supplies necessary for the operation of the project once completed will come from Onondaga County. Section 2 C Summary of how this project will help your business grow: N/A Section 2D Project Description: (i) The Project consists of approximately 334,000 SF of new construction. The breakdown of each use is as follows: Club House: 8,000 Square Feet Garages: 18,000 Square Feet Apartments: 308,000 Square Feet There will be a total of 248; 1 and 2 bedroom apartments ranging from 700 to 1,500 Square Feet. Along with the new construction the project will also renovate the existing Marina creating approximately 70 slips for boats up to 34’ and 30 Personal Watercraft slips. Other amenities of the project will include: 1) Fitness Center 2) Community Room 3) Dog Washing Facilities 4) Boat Launch 5) 1,100 feet of waterfront 6) 100-foot Sand Beach Page 92 (ii)Size of the Site: Approximately 18 acres of a 25 acre underutilized property. (iii)Current Use of the site: Marina and Boat Storage (iv) Principal Products and Activities: The project will consists of Residential Units and a Commercial Marina. (v)Why the Applicant is undertaking the Project and the need for the requested Benefits: The applicant is undertaking the project to take an underutilized 25-acre parcel of property on Oneida Lake to fulfill an unmet housing need in Onondaga County and specifically the northern suburbs; but for the benefits offered by the Onondaga County IDA the LOSO project would not be feasible. Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 THESE DOCUMENTS W ERE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL. THE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNS AND PLANS Page 97 ARE OW NED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. THESE DOCUMENTS MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR USED WITHOUT THE KNOW LEDGE OR CONSENT OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE C:\Users\ama0035\Documents\18068-LOSO-BLDG-6Bay-R2019_ama0035.rvt 2/25/2021 10:39:21 AM OF NEW YORK TO ALTER OR MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER. 1 2 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" GROUND FLOOR PLAN SECOND/THIRD FLOOR PLAN W D D W W D D W W D W D UP DN 5'-0" MIN D W D W CORRIDOR PACKAGE ELEVATOR TRASH TRASH ELEC DATA DATA W D W D W D W D 2'-0" JAN 9'-5" W D W D 2'-4" W D D W W D D W SEAL: HUEBER BREUER CONSTRUCTION COM PANY, INC No. Rev. © 2019 D AM JOB NO. 50 NEW CONSTRUCTION D E DATE ISSUED: % CONSULTANT: N E S PLANS O T V 2/ E 05 I G Date FO R L O /2 1 N LARGE APARTMENT BUILDING C P O N 16068 2/11/21 ST M LG R U E C N TI T TYPICAL FLOOR A101 LAKESHORE ROAD, CICERO NY O Desc. N SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13202 125 EAST JEFFERSON STREET - ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS PROFESSIONAL. THE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNS AND PLANS OF NEW YORK TO ALTER OR MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE ARE OW NED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. THESE DOCUMENTS MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR USED WITHOUT THE KNOW LEDGE OR CONSENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS W ERE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED COATS W COATS 6'-1 1/2" 5'-6" 6'-6" DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER. TYPE-B BATHROOM D 4'-0" 4'-0" LAUNDRY 9'-3" LINEN 9'-3" TYPE-B BATHROOM LINEN D 5'-4" 125 EAST JEFFERSON STREET MASTER BATHROOM SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13202 W CONSULTANT: CLOSET LIVING 5'-0" 4'-8" WIC 2/25/2021 10:39:22 AM WIC 6'-6" 14'-5 1/4" 14'-5 1/4" BEDROOM LIVING 10'-11 1/8" 15'-9 3/8" 13'-4 1/4" BEDROOM 9'-10 1/4" 12'-6 1/2" 10'-10 1/2" SEAL: % MASTER BEDROOM 21 N 12'-4 3/4" 12'-4 1/4" T 50 /1 I G C N N E O S TI 3/ ST M E D U P 02 R L O N O E C V R FO E D T O N MAGIC PACK MAGIC PACK HUEBER BREUER CONSTRUCTION COM PANY, INC 1-BEDROOM UNIT 2-BEDROOM INTERIOR UNIT LARGE APARTMENT BUILDING 1 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 1/4" = 1'-0" LAKESHORE ROAD, CICERO NY NEW CONSTRUCTION 1X8 PVC FASCIA "WHITE" ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLE PANTRY NORANDEX 5" LAP SIDING "SMOKE" 4'-0" TYPE-B BATHROOM ALUMINUM GUTTER "WHITE" COATS 5'-0" NORANDEX HOME ACCENTS SHINGLE SIDING "GRANITE" LINEN BOT. OF TRUSS +29' - 3 1/2" D 1X8 PVC BAND BOARD "WHITE" 5'-3 3/4" 4'-10" NORANDEX BOARD & BATTEN MASTER BATHROOM SIDING "STEEL BLUE" Rev. W No. Date Desc. 3 1/2" LINEAL 6'-6 1/4" CLOSET 5'-0" 1X12 PVC FASCIA 17'-3 1/4" THIRD FLOOR W.I.C. +19' - 9 1/2" LIVING AM JOB NO. FYPON PROSELECT 8" HVAC LOUVER - SIZE TBD 12'-6 1/2" 10'-10 5/8" COLUMN WRAP 9'-10 1/2" 16068 11'-7 1/2" 19'-1 1/2" BEDROOM ENLARGED PLAN MASTER BEDROOM & ELEVATION NORANDEX 5" LAP SIDING "STEEL BLUE" 12'-10 3/4" SECOND FLOOR +9' - 10 3/4" PVC GUARDRAIL, SQUARE BALUSTER, "WHITE" C:\Users\ama0035\Documents\18068-LOSO-BLDG-6Bay-R2019_ama0035.rvt DATE ISSUED: 2/11/21 5'-4" MAGIC PACK VERSETTA STONE "STERLING" LG FIRST FLOOR +0" 2 BEDROOM CORNER UNIT 3 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 EXTERIOR FINISH KEY A102 1/4" = 1'-0" © 2019 - ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS Page 98 THESE DOCUMENTS W ERE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL. THE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNS AND PLANS Page 99 ARE OW NED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. THESE DOCUMENTS MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR USED WITHOUT THE KNOW LEDGE OR CONSENT OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE C:\Users\ama0035\Documents\18068-LOSO-BLDG-6Bay-R2019_ama0035.rvt 2/25/2021 10:39:22 AM OF NEW YORK TO ALTER OR MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER. 1 1/8" = 1'-0" W-Roof 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 5" / 1'-0" 5" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" 6" / 1'-0" SEAL: HUEBER BREUER CONSTRUCTION COM PANY, INC No. Rev. © 2019 D AM JOB NO. 50 NEW CONSTRUCTION D E DATE ISSUED: % CONSULTANT: N E S O T V 04 E /2 I G Date FO R L O 4/ 12 N LARGE APARTMENT BUILDING C P O N 16068 2/11/21 ROOF PLANS ST M LG R U E C N TI T A130 LAKESHORE ROAD, CICERO NY O Desc. N SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13202 125 EAST JEFFERSON STREET - ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS THESE DOCUMENTS W ERE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL. THE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNS AND PLANS ARE OW NED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. THESE Page 100 DOCUMENTS MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR USED WITHOUT THE KNOW LEDGE OR CONSENT OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE C:\Users\ama0035\Documents\18068-LOSO-BLDG-6Bay-R2019_ama0035.rvt 2/25/2021 10:39:25 AM OF NEW YORK TO ALTER OR MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER. 2 1 +0" - 4' - 0" +9' - 10 3/4" +19' - 9 1/2" +29' - 3 1/2" +0" 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST FLOOR THIRD FLOOR T.O. FOOTING - 4' - 0" BOT. OF TRUSS SECOND FLOOR +9' - 10 3/4" +19' - 9 1/2" +29' - 3 1/2" FIRST FLOOR THIRD FLOOR T.O. FOOTING BOT. OF TRUSS SECOND FLOOR 9'-10 3/4" 9'-10 3/4" 9'-6" REAR ELEVATION 5'-4" 19'-1 1/2" FRONT ELEVATION 6" 1'-0" 5" / 1'-0" 5" / 1'-0" SEAL: HUEBER BREUER CONSTRUCTION COM PANY, INC No. Rev. © 2019 D AM JOB NO. 50 NEW CONSTRUCTION D E DATE ISSUED: % CONSULTANT: N E S O T V 04 E /2 I G Date FO L 4/ BUILDING R O 12 N LARGE APARTMENT BUILDING C P O N 16068 2/11/21 ELEVATIONS ST M R U E C N TI T A201 LAKESHORE ROAD, CICERO NY O Desc. N SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13202 125 EAST JEFFERSON STREET - ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS THESE DOCUMENTS W ERE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL. THE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNS AND PLANS ARE OW NED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. THESE Page 101 DOCUMENTS MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR USED WITHOUT THE KNOW LEDGE OR CONSENT OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE C:\Users\ama0035\Documents\18068-LOSO-BLDG-6Bay-R2019_ama0035.rvt 2/25/2021 10:39:26 AM OF NEW YORK TO ALTER OR MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER. 2 1 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" SIDE ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION +0" BOT +0" - 4' - 0" BOT - 4' - 0" +19' - 9 1/2" +29' - 53 1/2" +9' - 10 3/4" BOT. ofOFEAVE FIRST FLOOR +9' - 10 3/4" +19' - 9 1/2" +29' - 53 1/2" THIRD FLOOR T.O. FOOTING BOT. ofOFEAVE TRUSS FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR T.O. FOOTING TRUSS SECOND FLOOR SEAL: HUEBER BREUER CONSTRUCTION COM PANY, INC No. Rev. © 2019 D AM JOB NO. 50 NEW CONSTRUCTION D E DATE ISSUED: % CONSULTANT: N E S O T V 02 E /2 I G Date FO L 5/ BUILDING R O 21 N LARGE APARTMENT BUILDING C P O N 16068 2/11/21 ELEVATIONS ST M LG R U E C N TI T A202 LAKESHORE ROAD, CICERO NY O Desc. N SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13202 125 EAST JEFFERSON STREET - ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS THESE DOCUMENTS W ERE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL. THE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNS AND PLANS ARE OW NED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. THESE Page 102 DOCUMENTS MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR USED WITHOUT THE KNOW LEDGE OR CONSENT OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE C:\Users\ama0035\Documents\18068-LOSO-BLDG-6Bay-R2019_ama0035.rvt 2/25/2021 10:39:32 AM OF NEW YORK TO ALTER OR MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER. 2 1 3D BACK 3D FRONT SEAL: HUEBER BREUER CONSTRUCTION COM PANY, INC No. Rev. © 2019 D AM JOB NO. 50 NEW CONSTRUCTION D E DATE ISSUED: % CONSULTANT: N E S O T V 02 E /1 I G Date FO R L O 3/ 21 N LARGE APARTMENT BUILDING C P O N 16068 2/11/21 ST M LG R U E C N T 3D ELEVATIONS TI A203 LAKESHORE ROAD, CICERO NY O Desc. N SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13202 125 EAST JEFFERSON STREET - ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS Page 103 Page 104 Phase IA Archaeological Background and Literature Review and Phase IB Archaeological Field Reconnaissance Report of the Proposed Lakeshore at Loso Project in Cicero, Onondaga County, New York OPRHP #17PR08380 Final report prepared by: Alliance Archaeological Services Final report date: February 4th, 2018 Reports of Investigations 18FR01 4160 Watervale Road Mobile: 315-632-8283 Manlius, New York 13104 Visit us online at www.alliancearchaeology.com Page 105 Phase IA Archaeological Background and Literature Review and Phase IB Archaeological Field Reconnaissance Report of the Proposed Lakeshore at Loso Project in Cicero, Onondaga County, New York OPRHP #17PR08380 Final report prepared by: Nikki A. Waters, M.A. Principal Investigator Final report submitted by: Alliance Archaeological Services 4160 Watervale Road Manlius, New York 13104 Mobile: (315) 632-8283 Final report submitted to: Vincent E. Ryan, Landscape Designer Keplinger Freeman Associates, LLC 6320 Fly Road, Suite 201 East Syracuse, NY 13057 February 4th, 2018 Reports of Investigations 18FR01 Page 106 Management Summary Involved State and Federal Agencies: Town of Cicero, DEC, OPRHP OPRHP Project #: 17PR08380 Phase of Survey: Phase IA and IB Survey Size: ~9.6 hectares (~23.7 acres) Location Information: The project area is located to the north of the intersection of Lakeshore and Mud Mill roads in the Town of Cicero. The current work scope was defined as a phase IA background and literature review of the overall project area and a phase IB archaeological field reconnaissance of the current APE. Minor Civil Division: Town of Cicero County: Onondaga U.S.G.S. 7.5’ Quadrangle Map: 1973 Cicero, New York, photo-revised 1978, Copyright 2008 Maptech, Inc. Archaeological Survey Overview: Number and interval of shovel tests: 189 at 50ft/15m intervals Number and size of units: not applicable Width of plowed strips: not applicable Surface survey transect interval: not applicable Results of the Archaeological Survey: Number and name of pre-contact sites identified: 0 Number and name of historic sites identified: 0 Number and name of sites recommended for Phase II/Avoidance: 0 Results of the Architectural Survey: Number of buildings/structures/cemeteries within the project area: 0 Number of buildings/structures/cemeteries adjacent the project area: 0 Number of National Register Listed buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: 0 Number of National Register Eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: 0 Recommendations: Although the cultural background review indicated that the APE had the potential to contain previously unidentified pre-contact and/or historic archaeological sites, no cultural materials or cultural features were identified during the phase IB field investigation. As a result, the APE does not appear to have been the focus of any pre- contact or historic activities which could have left an archaeological trace. As a result, cultural resource clearance for the proposed Lakeshore at Loso project site is recommended. This recommendation is made with the understanding that if the APE boundaries should change, additional archaeological investigations may be required. As such, this recommendation is only valid for the APE boundaries as documented in this report (Figure 11). This recommendation of cultural resource clearance is also made with the understanding that if any archaeological materials, human remains or associated mortuary goods are uncovered during construction or earth-moving activities within the APE, work within the area will immediately cease and the OPRHP will be notified. Report Author and Affiliation: Nikki A. Waters, M.A., Principal Investigator. Alliance Archaeological Services, 4160 Watervale Road, Manlius, New York 13104. Final Report Date: February 4th, 2018 i Page 107 TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Summary .................................................................................................................................... i Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................... 1 Background Research ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental Setting ...................................................................................................................... 5 Past and Present Land Use and Current Conditions ........................................................... 5 Soils ................................................................................................................................... 5 Drainage ............................................................................................................................. 7 Site File Search ................................................................................................................................ 8 Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites ........................................................................ 8 Pre-contact Archaeological Sites ......................................................................... 8 OPRHP Site #A06702.000081 .............................................................. 8 William Beauchamp Onondaga County Site #34 .................................. 9 William Beauchamp Onondaga County Site #36 .................................. 9 Previous Professional Archaeological Investigations ........................................................ 9 Pre-contact Sensitivity Assessment ................................................................................... 9 National Register Listed and Eligible Properties ..............................................................16 Map-documented Historic Structures ...............................................................................16 Historic Sensitivity Assessment ........................................................................................17 Archaeological Phase IB Survey Methodology .............................................................................................17 Surface Inspection ...........................................................................................................................17 Subsurface Inspection .....................................................................................................................21 Additional Excavation .....................................................................................................................21 Archaeological Phase I Survey Results .........................................................................................................21 Summary of the Background and Literature Review ......................................................................21 Summary of the Surface Inspection ................................................................................................22 Summary of the Subsurface Inspection ...........................................................................................22 Conclusions and Recommendations ..............................................................................................................23 References Cited ............................................................................................................................................23 Appendix A. Photographs of the Project Area Appendix B. Shovel Test Pit Summary and Soil Profile Analysis List of Tables Table 1. Soils within the Project Area ........................................................................................................... 6 Table 2. Pre-recorded Archaeological Sites Reported Within the Vicinity of the Project Area .................... 8 Table 3. Map-Documented Structures Adjacent the APE ............................................................................16 List of Figures Figure 1. General location of the project area within New York State .......................................................... 2 Figure 2. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1973 Cicero, New York 7.5’ quadrangle, photo-revised 1978, Copyright 2008 Maptech, .............................................. 3 Figure 3. Soils within the project area as shown on the Web Soil Survey of Onondaga County .................. 4 Figure 4. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1852 Map of Onondaga County .........10 Figure 5. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1860 Map of Onondaga County .........11 Figure 6. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1874 Map of Onondaga County .........12 Figure 7. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1898 Syracuse quadrangle ..................13 Figure 8. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1944 Cicero quadrangle......................14 Figure 9. Drawing of the David Hoyt Farmstead .........................................................................................15 Figure 10. Location of the overall project area.............................................................................................18 Figure 11. Location of the APE and all proposed project improvements .....................................................19 Figure 12. Location of all subsurface testing within the APE ......................................................................20 ii Page 108 Figure 13. Location and orientation of all project photographs ............................................ Appendix A, p.iii iii Page 109 Introduction In response to a request from Keplinger Freeman Associates, LLC, Alliance Archaeological Services has completed a phase IA archaeological background and literature review and phase IB archaeological field reconnaissance of the proposed Lakeshore at Loso project in Cicero, Onondaga County, New York (OPRHP # 17PR08380). The purpose of a phase IA archaeological background and literature review is to identify and describe all previously recorded pre-EuroAmerican contact and historic archaeological sites and resources within and around the boundaries of the proposed project area. This information is then combined with a review of the natural setting of the project area in order to develop a regionally specific pre-contact and historic context. This context is then used to evaluate the project area’s sensitivity to contain additional pre-contact and/or historic archaeological sites. The results of the phase IA evaluation are then used to evaluate the necessity of any additional archaeological investigations, and if necessary, to formulate a project-specific phase IB archaeological field reconnaissance methodology. The results of both investigations are then used to evaluate the eligibility of any archaeological sites within the project area for nomination to the State and/or National Registers of Historic Places. All aspects of the phase I archaeological survey conducted for this project conform to the New York Archaeological Council’s (NYAC) Standards for Cultural Resource Investigations (1994) as adopted and required by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP), as well as to the Phase I Archaeological Report Format Requirements as published and required by the OPRHP (2005, revised 2013). The following report details the results of the phase IA background and literature review and phase IB archaeological field reconnaissance, and presents Alliance Archaeological Services’ conclusions and recommendations concerning the necessity of any additional archaeological investigations. Project Description The proposed project plan calls for the construction of an apartment complex with associated garages, parking areas and utilities within the existing Lakeshore Marina to the north of the intersection with Lakeshore and Mud Mill roads in the Town of Cicero, Onondaga County, New York. The overall project area consists of approximately 9.6 hectares (~23.7 acres) of land in a mix of maintained grass and isolated standing woodland. An existing residential home, marina and associated garage and storage areas are also present. A floodplain is present within the northern portion of the property extending south from Oneida Lake but will not be disturbed by any project construction. This area is therefore not included in the Area of Potential Effect (APE). Additional existing residential properties lie to the immediate west and south. The overall project borders are shown on Figure 10. The current project development plans and APE are shown in detail on Figure 11. The current work scope was defined as a phase IA background and literature review of the overall project area and a phase IB archaeological field reconnaissance of all portions of the current APE. Representative photographs of the overall project area and APE were taken at the time of the phase IB field investigation and are provided in Appendix A. Project Location The project area is located to the north of the intersection of Lakeshore and Mud Mill roads in the Town of Cicero in central New York State (Figure 1). Figure 2 shows the location of the project area as shown on portions of the 1973 Cicero, New York 7.5’ quadrangle, photo-revised 1978, Copyright 2008 Maptech, Inc. Figure 3 shows the project location as shown on a map generated on the Web Soil Survey. Historic maps of the project area are provided as figures 4 through 9. Figure 10 shows the location of the overall project area and Figure 11 shows the location of the APE and all proposed project improvements. Figure 12 shows the location of all subsurface testing and Figure 13 shows the location and orientation of all project photographs. Photographs (Appendix A) provide representative views of the APE at the time of the phase IB field investigation. 1 Page 110 Figure 1. General location of the project area within New York State (Adapted from a base map provided in Hutton and Rice 1977). 2 Page 111 Figure 2. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1973 Cicero, New York 7.5’ quadrangle, photo- revised 1978, Copyright 2008 Maptech, Inc. 3 Page 112 Figure 3. Soils within the project area as shown on the Web Soil Survey of Onondaga County. 4 Page 113 Background Research Environmental Setting The following represents a brief synthesis of the available information regarding the physical and environmental setting of the current project area. This information is provided in order to place this area within a context conducive to assessing its potential to contain significant archaeological resources. Past and Present Land Use and Current Conditions The proposed Lakeshore at Loso project site lies to the north of the intersection between Lakeshore and Mud Mill roads. It is bordered to the south and west by existing residential properties, to the north by Oneida Lake and to the east by scrub woodland. An existing residential house is within the southeast project corner and a 100- slip marina lies within the northeast overall project corner. Existing garage and storage buildings border the marina to the south. A gravel access road runs from Lakeshore Road north within the eastern overall project border. Smaller gravel access roads are also present. The APE is dominated by a mix of maintained grass and isolated standing woodland. A floodplain is present within the northern portion of the property to the west of the marina and extends south from Oneida Lake; however, this area will not be disturbed by any project construction and is therefore not included in the APE. A small stream also runs through the east-central project portion. Given that the phase I investigation was conducted in early to mid-winter, significant portions of the APE were also sporadically within ponded or saturated soils. As a result, shovel test intervals were either adjusted slightly to accommodate drier areas or excavated and documented quickly before they filled with water. Significantly ponded areas were marked on the project field map and shovel tests were completed once the soils had dried out. As a result, only those portions of the APE within the stream or within very poorly drained muck soils were eliminated from the phase IB investigation on the basis of drainage. Informal interviews conducted with the current property owner indicated that the overall project area was originally a part of the D.H. Hoyt farmstead and in the early 20th century was used as a cow pasture. The Hoyt residence is identified as MDS #3. At this time the property did not contain any trees. The existing pine trees were planted in the 1960s and the area to the south and southwest of the marina was excavated in the 1970s. The extent of this excavated and graded area is provided on Figure 12. A buried sewer pipeline was also installed across the northern portion of the overall project area approximately 75 feet from the shoreline of Oneida Lake (Figure 11). Additional isolated disturbances were related to the installation and maintenance of the gravel access roads. With the exception of the current marina structures and private residence no other outbuildings, foundations or other features were recalled as being present on the property. The review of available historic maps (figures 4 through 9) indicated that although no residential or commercial MDS are shown within the APE from 1852 onward, one private residential MDS was roughly adjacent the southwest corner in 1852. In addition, this overall area was originally a part of the David Hoyt farmstead, with the specific APE serving as a cow pasture until the early 20th century. However, in the mid-20th century, it was converted into a marina and private residence. Photographs (Appendix A) provide representative views of the APE at the time of the phase IB field investigation. Soils The overall project area and the APE are within the Bombay, Collamer, Dunkirk, Madrid and Palms series soil associations. The not-to-be disturbed floodpain area is almost exclusively within Cut and Fill Land (CFL); however, a narrow portion of the APE which extends west from the northwest APE portion to Beach Road is also shown within CFL. This mapping unit is within areas where the original soil has either been stripped or removed or where the original soils have been covered with fill from another location to a depth of 1 meter (3 feet) or more. As a result, the potential for intact archaeological materials to be present at or near the surface is negligible. Variably drained alluvial soils (FL) are also within the northeast overall project portion to the east of the marina. These soils are mapped along both banks of a small tributary of Oneida Lake and extend east beyond the project borders. Although a narrow portion of the APE does extend slightly north into these soils, the project disturbances within this area consist of modifications to the existing gravel access road. As a result, all project 5 Page 114 construction within this area will take place within soils which were previously disturbed by the original construction of the marina and the road. Bombay Series soils consist of deep, moderately well drained soils which formed in glacial till with a high content of sand. They are found on uplands (Hutton and Rice 1977: 39-40). Collamer Series soils consist of deep, moderately well drained soils which formed in stone-free, lake-deposited silt and very fine sand. They are found on the undulating tops of lake plains (Hutton and Rice 1977: 46-47). Dunkirk Series soils consist of deep, well drained soils which formed in glacio-lacustrine deposits of silt and very fine sand. They are also found on lake plains (Hutton and Rice 1977: 50-51). Madrid Series soils consist of deep, well drained soils which formed in loamy glacial till with a high content of sand. They are found on upland till plains and drumlins (Hutton and Rice 1977: 74-76). Palms Series soils consist of very poorly drained, well decomposed muck underlain by loamy mineral matter. They are found within boggy depressions on lake and till plains (Hutton and Rice 1977: 93). The specific soils within the APE are Bombay gravelly loam, 2 to 8% slopes (BoB); Collamer silt loam, 2 to 6% slopes (ChB); Cut and Fill Land (CFL); Dunkirk silt loam, 6 to 12% slopes (DuC); Fluvaquents, Frequently Flooded, 0 to 8% slopes (FL); Madrid gravelly loam, 8 to 15% slopes (MgC); and Palms muck (Pb) (Hutton and Rice 1977: pp. 39-40, 46-47, 50-51, 53, 74 -76 and 93; Web Soil Survey Map; Figure 3). The key properties of these soils are illustrated in Table 1 below. Table 1: Soils Within the Project Area Name Soil Horizon Depth Color Texture, Slope Drainage Landform (cm/in) Inclusions Bombay Ap: 0-25 cm (0-10 in) DkGrBrn GrvLo 2-8 WD On the gravelly AB: 25-41 cm (10-16 in) YBrn FSaLo undulating loam, (BoB) B2t: 41-74 cm (16-29 in) DkBrn HFSaLo uplands. B3: 74-97 cm (29-38 in) Brn GrvFSaLo C: 97-152 cm (38-60 in) Brn GrvHFSaLo Comments: this soil has a profile described as representative of the series. Collamer silt Ap: 0-25 cm (0-10 in) DkGrBrn SiLo 2-6 MWD On the loam, (ChB) AB: 25-41 cm (10-16 in) YBrn SiLo undulating BA: 41-61 cm (16-24 in) DkBrn SiLo tops of lake B21t: 61-81 cm (24-32 in) Brn HSiLo plains. B22t: 81-107 cm (32-42 in) Brn HSiLo C: 107-127 cm (42-50 in) RdBrn SiLo Comments: this soil has a profile described as representative of the series but erosion can be a hazard. Cut and Fill This mapping unit is within areas where the original soil has either been stripped or removed or Land (CFL) where the original soils have been covered with fill from another location to a depth of 1 meter (3 feet) or more. As a result, the potential for intact archaeological materials to be present at or near the surface is negligible. Dunkirk silt Ap: 0-13 cm (0-5 in) DrkBrn SiLo 6-12 WD On lakeplains. loam, (DuC) A1: 13-28 cm (5-11 in) YBrn SiLo A22: 28-41 cm (11-16 in) Brn SiLo B21t: 41-53 cm (16-21 in) Brn HSiLo B22t: 53-91 cm (21-36 in) Brn HSiLo C1: 91-102 cm (36-40 in) Brn HSiLo C2: 102-183 cm (40-72 in) DkGrBrn Silt/Sand Comments: this soil has a profile described as representative of the series but erosion can be a hazard. Fluvaquents, This mapping unit consists of alluvial soils and recent alluvial deposits and can range from well to Frequently very poorly drained over short distances. As a result, each area must be assessed independently. Flooded,(FL) Slopes typically range from 0 to 8%. Madrid Ap: 0-23 cm (0-9 in) Brn-DkBrn FSaLo 8-15 WD On the sides of gravelly B1: 23-48 cm (9-19 in) Brn FSaLo low hills and loam, (MgC) BA2: 48-58 cm (19-23 in) RdBrn FSaLo drumlins or on B2t: 58-107 cm (23-42 in) RdBrn FSaLo the sideslopes C: 107-188 cm (42-74 in) RdBrn HFSaLo of drainages. 6 Page 115 Comments: this soil has a profile described as representative of the series; however, this mapping unit has a gravelly loam surface layer. Moderate to severe erosion can also be a hazard. Palms muck Oa1: 0-20 cm (0-8 in) Blk SapMat Level to VPD Low areas on (Pb) Oa2: 20-36 cm (8-14 in) Blk SapMat nearly lakeplains or Oa3: 36-61 cm (14-24 in) Blk SapMat level. depressions on IICg: 61-127 cm (24-50 in) Gr LtClLo till plains. Comments: this soil has a profile described as representative of the series. COLOR/TEXTURE KEY: Blk-Black Brn-Brown Cl-Clay cm-centimeters Dk-Dark F-Fine Gr-Grayish Grv-Gravelly H-Heavy Lo-Loam Lt-Light Rd-reddish Sa-Sandy SapMat-Sapric Material Si-Silt Y-Yellowish DRAINAGE KEY: MWD-Moderately Well Drained WD-Well Drained VPD-Very Poorly Drained The APE is almost exclusively within a mix of moderately well to well drained soils which formed in glacio-lacustrine and glacial till deposits on uplands and old lake plains. With the exception of a low hill within the southwest corner, all portions of the APE are relatively level. As a result, erosion will have been a minimal hazard. Cultural materials, if present, are therefore expected to be within the upper and central portions of the soil profile: i.e. less than 40 cm (16 inches) below the ground surface. A comparison of the results of the phase IB soil evaluation with the published soil information is provided in the Results section. The only exceptions are the extreme northern edges of the APE which extend into Cut and Fill Land (CFL), very poorly drained muck (Pb) and variably drained alluvium (FL). These northern sections complete the overall project area (Figure 3). The variably drained alluvium is present within the extreme northeast overall project corner and borders both sides of a small stream which drains into Oneida Lake (Figure 3). However, the stream and the majority of its floodplain lie east of the overall project borders. The portion of the APE which extends into this area consists of the built-up portion of the gravel road used to access the east portion of the marina. This area was previously significantly disturbed by both the construction of the marina and the installation of the gravel access road. No new building or construction will take place within this area. As a result, no deep archaeological testing was conducted. The Cut and Fill Land dominates the not-to-be –disturbed portion of the overall project area which runs north to Oneida Lake from the APE. However, a lobe of this mapping unit also extends south along both sides of Beach Road and covers the western portion of the proposed access road from the western border of the APE to Beach Road. The eastern portion of this access road is mapped with very poorly drained muck (Figure 3). Given these factors, this access road was considered to have a very low potential to contain potentially significant archaeological resources and no further investigations were conducted. Drainage The overall project area and APE are drained by Oneida Lake which borders the overall project area to the north. A small stream also runs within the eastern APE portion and drains into the marina. The location and course of this small stream is related to excavation and grading conducted on the property in the 1960s and 70s. Although no wetlands are shown as present within the overall project area on the modern topographic map (Figure 2), a very large wetland track is present to the immediate northwest to the west and south of Beach Road. The phase IB fieldwork was completed in mid-winter and although significant areas of ponded and/or saturated soils were identified during periods of rain and immediately following episodes of thaw, the moderately well to well drained soils drained quickly. As a result, shovel tests were still able to be excavated during periods of warmer weather. When areas of persistent ponding or saturation were encountered, the location was marked on the project field map and shovel tests were completed at a later date. As a result, no portions of the APE outside of the Cut and Fill Land or very poorly drained muck soil mapping units were eliminated on the basis of drainage. 7 Page 116 Site File Search Evaluated site files included the currently available New York State Museum (NYSM) site file records, the currently available OPRHP site file records and the currently available OPRHP previous archaeological survey report files. Available National Register of Historic Places Building Inventories were also evaluated to identify both National Register Listed (NRL) and National Register Eligible (NRE) structures within or adjacent to the current project area. Historic map evaluation included the 1852 Map of Onondaga County, the 1860 Map of Onondaga County, the 1874 Map of Onondaga County, the 1898 Syracuse quadrangle, and the 1944 Cicero quadrangle. A drawing of the David Hoyt farmstead showing the overall project area as cow pasture has also been included as Figure 9. The file search also included an evaluation of any pre-EuroAmerican contact sites documented by early investigators of the region, such as Beauchamp (1900) and Parker (1922), as well as an evaluation of the Town of Cicero and Onondaga County histories for information relevant to the current project. These data were then combined with the results of the natural and environmental setting review in order to construct a regionally specific archaeological sensitivity assessment for the current project area. The results of this file search are presented below. Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites A review of the currently available site files indicated that no pre-contact or historic archaeological sites have yet been recorded either within or adjacent to the overall project area or current APE and no historic archaeological sites have yet been recorded within one mile. However, at least one pre-contact site has been recorded in the OPRHP records within this same interval. Beauchamp (1900) and Parker (1922) also show two additional pre-contact sites within the overall area. None of these pre-recorded sites have yet been determined National Register Eligible and none are National Register Listed. Each pre-recorded archaeological site is summarized in Table 2 and discussed in more detail below. Table 2: Pre-recorded Archaeological Sites Reported within the Vicinity of the Project Area NYS OPRHP Site # Additional Site #s Dist./Direction Time Period Site Type and/or Names (meters/feet)* A06702.000081 Justelle Estates 305 meters; Late Archaic camp Prehistoric Site 1,000 feet; E (3,000 – 1,000 B.P.) --- WB ONON #34; unknown; within indeterminate camps ACP ONON #75 Lots 32 and 33 pre-contact --- WB ONON #36; unknown; E indeterminate camps ACP ONON #78 pre-contact *Minimum distance provided. ACP = Arthur C. Parker WB = William Beauchamp Pre-contact Archaeological Sites OPRHP Site #A06702.000081 OPRHP Site #A06702.000081 is shown to the east of the APE to the east of Shellman Drive. This site was recorded in February of 1998 by Pratt and Pratt Archaeological Consultants, Inc. Recovered cultural materials consisted of an indeterminate number of flakes, fire-cracked rock, charcoal and a possible hearth or roasting area. Although no diagnostic materials were reported as recovered during the phase I, one Sylvan Stemmed, one Brewerton Side-notched, and one Normanskill point were reported as recovered during phase II. Additional cultural materials included flakes, scrapers, an anvil stone, chopper, knives, calcined bone and fire-cracked rock. Phase III data recovery excavations were recommended but no formal National Register determination form was identified. In addition, no record or report of this site beyond the state site form could be found in the OPRHP records. It is therefore unclear if phase III investigations were conducted. Given its proximity to Parker Site #75 it is highly likely that this represents the same resource. Although further study of this resource is therefore highly likely to produce additional information significant to our understanding of the history of the region, as this site is beyond the current project borders, no related archaeological deposits or features should be impacted. As a result, no archaeological investigations of this site as related to the current project were conducted. 8 Page 117 William Beauchamp Onondaga County Site #34 This site was first recorded by Beauchamp as his Onondaga County Site #34 and consisted of “small camps on lots 32 and 33, Cicero about South Bay on Oneida lake, and another farther east on the Eastwood farm lot 46” (Beauchamp 1900: 117). Parker’s description is identical but he identifies this resource as Onondaga County Site #75 (Parker 1922: Plate 196, p. 646). A review of the 1860 and 1874 maps (figures 5 and 6) show that the current project area is within Lot 32 and that Lot 33 lies adjacent to the east. The Justelle Prehistoric Site discussed above is within the eastern portion of Lot 32 near its border with Lot 33 and most likely represents a component of this resource. Two residences belonging to an N.P and S.A. Eastwood, respectively, are also shown along the north side of Lakeshore Road within the northeast portion of Lot 33 near its border with Lot 46. No further information was available. Given the broad description of these camps as lying somewhere within lots 32 and 33 it is possible that one of these camps is within or adjacent to the current project area. Both Beauchamp and Parker recorded similar general camp areas throughout New York State and used them to represent zones where scattered cultural remains could often be found. Given that the current APE lies within one of these generalized areas, there is a potential for associated archaeological materials to be present. At least one related camp site (the Justelle Prehistoric Site) has already been recorded to the east. As a result, further archaeological investigations related to the current project were conducted. William Beauchamp Onondaga County Site #36 This site was first recorded by Beauchamp as a portion of his Onondaga County Site #36 and consisted of “small camps, as on the islands in Cicero swamp and on Frenchman’s and Dunham’s islands in Oneida lake” (Beauchamp 1900: 117). Parker’s description is identical but he identifies this resource as Onondaga County Site #78 (Parker 1922: Plate 196, p. 646). This site lies to the east of the sites discussed above. No further information was available. Although further study of this resource is highly likely to produce additional information significant to our understanding of the history of the region, as this site is well beyond the current project borders, no related archaeological deposits should be impacted. As a result, no archaeological investigations of this site as related to the current project were conducted. Previous Professional Archaeological Investigations A review of the available survey files indicated that the current project area has never been the subject of professional archaeological investigations and no professional investigations have yet been conducted near or adjacent to the current APE. However, at least two full phase I surveys have previously been conducted within approximately one mile. Although a report copy could not be identified, phase I and II investigations were also conducted to the east of the current project area by Pratt and Pratt Archaeological Consultants. These surveys resulted in the identification of the Justelle Prehistoric Site discussed above. The first survey was conducted to the southwest of the current project area at and extending beyond the one mile evaluation interval by the Environmental Collaborative and consisted of a phase I evaluation of the proposed John’s Landing Extension project (Reuter 2001). However, no cultural materials were identified and no further archaeological investigations were conducted. The second survey was conducted to the northwest of the current project area by Hartgen Archaeological Associates, Inc. and consisted of a phase I evaluation of the Leon’s Cottages Lot Development project site (Hartgen 2004). However, no cultural materials were identified and no further archaeological investigations were conducted. Pre-contact Sensitivity Assessment The review of archaeological sites indicated that no pre-contact archaeological sites have yet been definitely recorded within or adjacent to the current project area on the state records. However, both Beauchamp and Parker indicate that camps are present within lots 32 and 33. The current project area is within Lot 32. Consistent with these descriptions, the Justelle Prehistoric Site was identified to the east of the current project area near the border between lots 32 and 33. Phase II test excavations indicated that this site consisted of a Late Archaic camp. Additional camps were recorded further to the east within Lot 46. Although they are beyond the one mile interval evaluated for this project, two additional pre-contact sites have also been recorded to the northwest along the large ridge within the swamp. As a result, it is highly likely that the current project area represents part of the resource extraction sphere utilized during the habitation of the camp sites centered along the shores of Oneida Lake. Although the procurement of floral and faunal resources does not always produce a visible archaeological trace, 9 Page 118 Figure 4. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1852 Map of Onondaga County. 10 Page 119 Figure 5. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1860 Map of Onondaga County. 11 Page 120 Figure 6. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1874 Map of Onondaga County. 12 Page 121 Figure 7. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1898 Syracuse, New York quadrangle. 13 Page 122 Figure 8. Location of the project area as shown on a portion of the 1944 Cicero, New York quadrangle. 14 Page 123 Figure 9. A drawing identified in the county history (Clayton 1878: 344-345) showing the Hoyt Farmstead. 15 Page 124 there is a potential for similar activities which transcended this threshold to have taken place within the current project boundaries. As a result, the current APE was considered to have a moderate to high potential to contain previously unidentified pre-contact sites. National Register Listed and Eligible Properties A review of the available National Register of Historic Places Building Inventories indicated that no National Register Listed (NRL) or National Register Eligible (NRE) resources are present within or closely adjacent to the current APE. Although the residential home within the southeast corner of the current project area is included on the Building and Structures Inventory List (A06702.000142) it was determined to be ineligible. Two additional residential structures further to the west of the current project area along Mud Mill Road (A06702.000087 and A06702.000112) were also determined to be ineligible. As a result, no NRL, NRE or listed resources will be impacted by the proposed project. Map-documented Historic Structures The review of available historic maps (figures 4 through 9) indicated that no map-documented structures (MDS) are shown within the overall project area from 1852 until 1944. However, one residential MDS (MDS #1) is shown as roughly adjacent the southwest corner in 1852 (Figure 4). This MDS is shown as no longer extant from 1860 onward. The historic map review also indicated that three additional residential MDS are present to the southwest and southeast along Mud Mill and Lakeshore roads in close proximity. A fourth MDS is shown to the northeast of the northeast project corner. All of these resources are discussed in the narrative below and listed in Table 3. Their locations are also shown on figures 3 and 12. By the time of the current investigation, only MDS #3 and MDS #5 were still extant. However, a private residence which could be MDS #2 was also noted. The first (MDS #1) is shown to the southwest of the APE along the north side of Mud Mill Road. This MDS is only shown as extant in 1852 (Figure 4) and is identified as the D. Shepherd residence. This MDS is missing from all subsequent historic maps. At the time of the current evaluation, the location of this MDS was occupied by modern private residential houses. MDS #2 is shown to the southwest of the APE along the south side of Mud Mill Road and is identified as a school house in 1852 (Figure 4), as School House #4 in 1860 (Figure 5), and as a school in 1874 (Figure 6). It is unclear from the 1898 map (Figure 7) if this MDS is still extant, but the South Bay School is shown in this general location in 1944 (Figure 8). The modern topographic map (Figure 2) also shows a structure near this general location. At the time of the current evaluation a private residence which may represent the converted school house was still extant. MDS #3 is shown to the southeast of the APE along the south side of Lakeshore Road just to the east of its intersection with Mud Mill Road. It is identified as the D.H. Hoyt residence from 1852 until 1874 (figures 4 to 6). An unnamed structure is still shown at this location on the 1898 and 1944 maps (figures 7 and 8) as well as on the modern topographic map (Figure 2). At the time of the current evaluation a private historic residence was still extant at this location. Informal interviews with the current owner of the project area indicated that this area was originally part of this farmstead. MDS #4 is shown to the southwest of the APE along the south side of Mud Mill Road just to the west of MDS #2. It is identified as the H. Shephard residence from 1860 until 1874 (figures 5 to 6). Although an unnamed structure is still shown at this location on the 1898 map (Figure 7) it is unclear whether or not this structure represents the school house or the Shephard residence. However, the South Bay School is shown near this location in 1944 (Figure 8) so it is likely that this MDS was removed sometime between 1874 and 1944 (Figure 8). At the time of the current evaluation a modern private residence was present at this location. MDS #5 is shown to the northeast of the APE from 1944 onward (figures 8 and 2). At the time of the current evaluation, a private modern residence was still present at this location. Table 3. Map-Documented Structures Adjacent the APE MDS 1852 1860 1874 1898 1944 1978 # 1 D. Shepherd --- --- --- --- --- 2 School School #4 School untitled? South Bay untitled School 3 D.H. Hoyt D.H. Hoyt D.H. Hoyt untitled untitled untitled 16 Page 125 4 --- H. Shephard H. Shephard untitled? --- --- 5 --- --- --- --- untitled untitled As a result, it appears that the current APE was either vacant or agricultural land from at least 1852 until its development as a marina in the mid-20th century. Informal interviews conducted with the current property owner indicated that the project area was originally a part of the Hoyt farmstead (MDS #3) and at the beginning of the 20th century was being used as a cow pasture. A drawing identified in the county history (Clayton 1878: 344-345) shows the Hoyt farmhouse (MDS #3) as well as a cow pasture within the location of the current project area. Historic Sensitivity Assessment A review of the available historic literature indicated that Cicero was originally a part of Township #6 of the Military Tract and was originally a part of the Town of Lysander. The Town of Cicero was established in 1807 and included Clay. However, the Town of Clay was separated off in 1827. In regards to the current project area, MDS #3 was the private residence David H. Hoyt, a descendent of Simon Hoyt who settled in Massachusetts in 1628. David H. Hoyt was a member of the sixth generation of the Hoyt family and was born on April 28th, 1813. He moved to the Town of Cicero in 1836 and he and his brother, Jacob, purchased 136 acres of land. He married Caroline Andrews on October 5th, 1843 and they raised ten children. He was pre-deceased by his wife on March 22nd, 1877 (Clayton 1878: 337-344). A pencil drawing looking northeast at the Hoyt farmstead is provided as Figure 9. It shows two large barns across from the main house and a cow pasture to the west. Frenchman’s and Dunham’s islands can also be seen in the background. The two barns are within areas covered by private modern houses. The location of the cow pasture is consistent with the information provided by the current property owner. This review therefore indicated that although no residential or commercial MDS are shown within the APE from 1852 onward, one private residential MDS was roughly adjacent the southwest corner in 1852. In addition, this overall area was originally a part of the David Hoyt farmstead, with the specific APE serving as a cow pasture until the early 20th century. At this time it was converted into a marina. The potential for previously unidentified historic archaeological deposits to be present within the APE was therefore considered to be moderate. If present, these deposits would most likely be associated with 19th to early 20th century refuse discarded during agricultural activities. Archaeological Survey Methodology All aspects of the phase IB field evaluation of the proposed Lakeshore at Loso project site were conducted by and under the direct supervision of Nikki A. Waters, M.A., Principal Investigator. Field crew consisted of Reda A. Korkor. Fieldwork was completed on December 24th, 2017 and January 20th, 21st, 22nd, 27th, 28th, and 29th, 2018. Project photography was conducted during fieldwork. Conditions at the time of the phase IB field investigation were clear and cold with highs averaging in the 40s. Field excavations were shortened on January 22nd and 27th due to rain. However, no significant fieldtime was lost due to adverse weather or field conditions. All aspects of this evaluation were conducted in accordance with the New York Archaeological Council’s Standards for Cultural Resource Investigations (1994) as adopted and required by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP), as well as to the Phase I Archaeological Report Format Requirements as published and required by the OPRHP (2005; revised 2013). The specific field methodology employed is discussed in more detail below. Surface Inspection A non-systematic pedestrian survey was first conducted in order to gather data relevant to 1) assessing the nature and extent of the previous disturbance, 2) gather data relevant to formulating an effective systematic subsurface testing strategy, and 3) identify any obvious surface indications of pre-contact and/or historic archaeological materials and/or features prior to the initiation of more intensive investigations. Optimal locations for shovel test transects, based upon their potential to provide the widest possible sample set, were also selected. The surface inspection was conducted when snow cover was minimal or absent. All final shovel test locations were recorded on the project map (Figure 12). 17 Page 126 Figure 10. Location of the overall project area (Adapted from a base map provided by Keplinger and Freeman Associates). 18 Page 127 Figure 11. Location of the overall project area, APE and all proposed project improvements (Adapted from a base map provided by Keplinger and Freeman Associates). 19 Page 128 Figure 12. Location of all subsurface testing within the APE (Adapted from a base map provided by Keplinger and Freeman Associates). The locations of all MDS from Table 3 are shown in green. 20 Page 129 If cultural materials had been identified, a pin flag would have been placed at each findspot until the full distribution of the surface scatter could be identified. All artifact findspots would then have been recorded on the project map and the materials bagged by pin flag and GPS coordinates. Radial shovel tests would then have been excavated in the area surrounding each positive findspot in order to further evaluate the soil stratigraphy and assess the potential for additional and/or buried cultural materials and/or features to be present. The specific shovel test methodology is described in detail below. Subsurface Inspection Given that the available ground surface visibility throughout the APE was less than 5%, no surface indications of pre-contact and/or historic archaeological sites were identified during the non-systematic surface inspection, significant previous disturbance related to excavation and grading was identified related to the marina and storage area, and no archaeological sites were found to be definitively documented within or adjacent to this area, only a standard, subsurface investigation was conducted (Appendix B). This investigation involved the hand excavation of shovel tests at no greater than 15 meter (50 foot) intervals across all portions of the APE not currently covered by existing structures, within areas of very poorly drained muck soils, Cut and Fill Land, or within areas showing surface indications of significant previous excavation and grading. All shovel tests were a minimum of 30 cm (12 inches) in diameter, excavated a minimum of one cubic foot of soil, and were continued into undisturbed or non-artifact bearing subsoil. All excavated soils were then screened through 6mm (1/4 inch) mesh hardware cloth. The exposed soil profile was then visually examined to aid in the identification of cultural features, deposits and/or buried cultural horizons. If cultural materials had been identified, the recovered artifacts would have been bagged by shovel test location and relative depth below surface. Eight radial shovel tests would then have been excavated in each of the cardinal and subcardinal directions at 3 and 7.5 meter (10 and 25 foot) intervals, respectively. If indications of cultural features had been noted, the relevant portion of the shovel test would have been profiled, the exposed feature described and documented, and then covered with plastic prior to backfilling. Additional radial shovel tests, as described above, would then have been excavated. All positive shovel test locations would have been recorded on the project map (Figure 12). A detailed soil profile, including Munsell color and soil texture analyses, was obtained for each excavated probe. Upon completion of each investigation, all shovel tests were backfilled and their location recorded on the project map (Figure 12). Additional Excavation The extreme northeast edge of the APE is mapped within variably drained alluvium (FL) (Figure 3). This soil is present within the extreme northeast overall project corner and borders both sides of a small stream which drains into Oneida Lake (Figure 3). However, the stream and the majority of its floodplain lie east of the overall project borders. The portion of the APE which extends into this area consists of the built-up portion of the gravel road used to access the east portion of the marina. This area was previously significantly disturbed by both the construction of the marina and the installation of the gravel access road. No new building or construction will take place within this area. As a result, no deep archaeological testing was conducted. Archaeological Phase IB Survey Results Summary of the Background and Literature Review The background and literature review indicated that no pre-contact archaeological sites have yet been definitely recorded within or adjacent to the current project area on the state records. However, both Beauchamp and Parker indicate that camps are present within lots 32 and 33. The current project area is within Lot 32. Consistent with these descriptions, the Justelle Prehistoric Site was identified to the east of the current project area near the border between lots 32 and 33. Phase II test excavations indicated that this site consisted of a Late Archaic camp. Additional camps were recorded further to the east by Beauchamp and Parker within Lot 46. Although they are beyond the one mile interval evaluated for this project, two additional pre-contact sites have been recorded to the northwest along the large ridge within the swamp. As a result, it is highly likely that the current project area represents part of the resource extraction sphere utilized during the habitation of the camp sites centered along the shores of Oneida Lake. Although the procurement of floral and faunal resources does not always produce a visible 21 Page 130 archaeological trace, there is a potential for similar activities which transcended this threshold to have taken place within the current project boundaries. As a result, the current APE was considered to have a moderate to high potential to contain previously unidentified pre-contact sites. This review also indicated that although no residential or commercial MDS are shown within the APE from 1852 onward, one private residential MDS was roughly adjacent the southwest corner in 1852. In addition, this overall area was originally a part of the David Hoyt farmstead, with the specific APE serving as a cow pasture until the early 20th century. At this time it was converted into a marina. The potential for previously unidentified historic archaeological deposits to be present within the APE was therefore considered to be moderate. If present, these deposits would most likely be associated with 19th to early 20th century refuse discarded during agricultural activities. Summary of the Surface Inspection The non-systematic pedestrian survey confirmed that the proposed Lakeshore at Loso project site lies to the north of the intersection between Lakeshore and Mud Mill roads. It is bordered to the south and west by existing residential properties, to the north by Oneida Lake and to the east by scrub woodland. An existing residential house constructed in the 1960s is within the southeast project corner and a 100-slip marina lies within the northeast overall project corner. Existing garage and storage buildings border the marina to the south. A gravel access road runs from Lakeshore Road north adjacent and within the eastern overall project border, and additional gravel access roads cross the property. The APE is dominated by a mix of maintained grass and isolated standing woodland. A floodplain is present within the northern portion of the property to the west of the marina and extends south from Oneida Lake; however, this area will not be disturbed by any project construction and is therefore not included in the APE. A small stream also runs through the east-central project portion and is related to the original construction of the marina. The marina and a storage area to the south were excavated in the 1970s and therefore represent areas of previous significant disturbance. Ground surface visibility adjacent this area to the west was also sufficient to identify the presence of BtC deposits mixed with gravel on the surface. As a result, these areas were also determined to be previously significantly disturbed and were not included in the shovel test evaluation. Given that the phase I investigation was conducted in early to mid-winter, significant portions of the APE were also sporadically within ponded or saturated soils. As a result, shovel test intervals were either adjusted slightly to accommodate drier areas or excavated and documented quickly before they filled with water. Persistently ponded areas were marked in the project field map and shovel tests were completed once the soils had dried out. As a result, only those portions of the APE within the stream or within very poorly drained muck were eliminated from the phase IB investigation on the basis of drainage. Summary of the Subsurface Investigations A total of 189 standard interval (50 feet/15 meter) shovel tests were excavated across the previously undisturbed portions of the APE (Figure 12). With the exception of the excavated and graded areas within the east- central project portions and the access road to Beach Road within cut and fill soils, all undisturbed portions of the APE were shovel tested. All previously disturbed areas were related to the construction of the marina and private residence in the 1960s and 1970s. Minor alterations to the survey interval were also used to avoid saturated or ponded soils; however, when this was not possible, ponded shovel test locations were noted and completed at a later date. All shovel tests produced soils consistent with the mapped profiles of the region (Hutton and Rice 1977: pp. 39-40, 46-47, 50-51, 53, 74 -76 and 93; Web Soil Survey Map; Figure 3). A typical profile consisted of a dark brown, silt loam to firm silt loam to fine sandy loam A-horizon. The average depth was 12 cm (5 inches) below the current surface. The shallowest soils were identified near the borders of the previously excavated area as well as within the yard of the existing private residence. The sandier soils were identified within the small hill within the southern project portion. The B-horizon soils consisted of a brown to dark yellowish brown, silt loam to firm silt loam to fine sandy loam. Depth of excavation within the subsoil ranged from 19 to 37 cm (7 to 15 inches) below the current surface. No cultural materials or indications of cultural features were recovered from any of the shovel tests excavated within the APE. As a result, no further archaeological investigations were conducted. 22 Page 131 Conclusions and Recommendations In response to a request from Keplinger Freeman Associates, LLC, Alliance Archaeological Services has completed a phase IA archaeological background and literature review and phase IB archaeological field reconnaissance of the proposed Lakeshore at Loso project in Cicero, Onondaga County, New York (OPRHP # 17PR08380). Although the cultural background review indicated that the APE had the potential to contain previously unidentified pre-contact and/or historic archaeological sites, no cultural materials or cultural features were identified during the phase IB field investigation. As a result, the APE does not appear to have been the focus of any pre- contact or historic activities which could have left an archaeological trace. As a result, cultural resource clearance for the proposed Lakeshore at Loso project site is recommended. This recommendation is made with the understanding that if the APE boundaries should change, additional archaeological investigations may be required. As such, this recommendation is only valid for the APE boundaries as documented in this report (Figure 11). This recommendation of cultural resource clearance is also made with the understanding that if any archaeological materials, human remains or associated mortuary goods are uncovered during construction or earth-moving activities within the APE, work within the area will immediately cease and the OPRHP will be notified. References Cited Beauchamp, William 1900 The Aboriginal Occupation of New York. New York State Museum, Bulletin 32, Vol. 7. Albany, New York. Clayton, W.W. 1878 History of Onondaga County, New York. D. Mason & Co., Publishers. Syracuse, New York. Dawson, A.R.Z. 1860 Map of Onondaga County, New York. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Fagan, L. 1852 Map of Onondaga County, New York. E.H. Babcock & Co. Syracuse, New York. Hartgen Archaeological Associates, Inc. 2004 Phase IA Literature Review Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment and Phase IB Archaeological Field Investigation, Leon’s Cottages Lot Development, Town of Cicero, Onondaga County, New York. Report prepared by Hartgen Archaeological Associates, Inc. Rensselaer, New York. Hutton, Frank Z. and C. Erwin Rice 1977 Soil Survey of Onondaga County, New York. United States Department of the Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station. New York State Museum 2018 Site file records on file at the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation 2018 Site and previous archaeological survey file records. Parker, Arthur 1922 The Archaeological History of New York. New York State Museum. Albany, New York. 23 Page 132 Reuter, Barbara C. 2001 Revised Report, John’s Landing Extension, Stage IB Archaeological Survey Report, Town of Cicero, Onondaga County, New York. Revised report prepared by The Environmental Collaborative. Fayetteville, New York. Sweet, Homer D.L. 1874 New Atlas of Onondaga County, New York. Walker Bros. & Co. New York, New York. U.S. Geological Survey 1898 Syracuse, New York quadrangle map. Department of the Interior. 1944 Cicero, New York quadrangle map. Department of the Interior. 24 Page 133 Appendix A: Photographs of the Project Area Page 134 LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS Photograph 1. Looking southwest along Lakeshore Road from the southeast project corner ....................... 1 Photograph 2. Looking northwest from Lakeshore Road across the southeast project corner ...................... 1 Photograph 3. Looking northwest at the yard of the private home within the southeast project corner ........ 2 Photograph 4. Looking southeast along Lakeshore Road from the southeast project corner ........................ 2 Photograph 5. Looking west from the access road along the southern project border ................................. 3 Photograph 6. Looking north along the access road leading from Lakeshore Road ..................................... 3 Photograph 7. Looking east across the rear yard of the private home within the southeast project corner ... 4 Photograph 8. Looking north along the access road along the eastern project border ................................... 4 Photograph 9. Looking southeast across the yard of the private home within the southeast project corner .. 5 Photograph 10. Looking south across the yard of the private home within the southeast project corner ...... 5 Photograph 11. Looking south across the yard of the private home along the access road ........................... 6 Photograph 12. Looking southeast across the southeast project portion ....................................................... 6 Photograph 13. Looking south across the southeast project portion.............................................................. 7 Photograph 14. Looking west across the southeast project portion ............................................................... 7 Photograph 15. Looking northwest along the gravel road within the southeast project portion .................... 8 Photograph 16. Looking northwest across the southern project portion........................................................ 8 Photograph 17. Looking north across the eastern project portion ................................................................. 9 Photograph 18. Looking east across the southeast project portion ................................................................ 9 Photograph 19. Looking southwest across the access road within the southeast project portion .................10 Photograph 20. Looking north along the western project border from the southwest project portion..........10 Photograph 21. Looking northeast across the southern project portion ........................................................11 Photograph 22. Looking east across the southern project portion from the southwest project portion ........11 Photograph 23. Looking east across the southern project portion from the southwest project portion ........12 Photograph 24. Looking south along the western project border at the southwest project portion ..............12 Photograph 25. Looking west along the access road within the northwest project portion ..........................13 Photograph 26. Looking north along the western project border at the northwest project portion...............13 Photograph 27. Looking northeast across the northwest project portion ......................................................14 Photograph 28. Looking east across the northwest project portion from the northwest project portion ......14 Photograph 29. Looking east across the northwest project portion from the northwest project portion ......15 Photograph 30. Looking southeast across the northwest project portion .....................................................15 Photograph 31. Looking south along the western project border from the northwest project portion..........16 Photograph 32. Looking north along the western project border from the northwest project portion ..........16 Photograph 33. Looking south along the western project border from the northwest project portion..........17 Photograph 34. Looking west along the existing sewer line within the northern project portion.................17 Photograph 35. Looking southwest across the northern project portion.......................................................18 Photograph 36. Looking south across the northern project portion from the northern project portion. .......18 Photograph 37. Looking southeast across the northern project portion ........................................................19 Photograph 38. Looking east along the existing sewer line within the northern project portion ..................19 Photograph 39. Looking west along the existing sewer line within the northern project portion.................20 Photograph 40. Looking east along the existing sewer line within the northern project portion. .................20 Photograph 41. Looking south across the northern project portion from the northern project portion ........21 Photograph 42. Looking east across the northern project portion from the northern project portion ...........21 Photograph 43. Looking northeast across the northern project portion. .......................................................22 Photograph 44. Looking southeast across the northeast project portion.......................................................22 Photograph 45. Looking northeast across the marina within the northeast project portion ..........................23 Photograph 46. Looking north along the access road within the northeast project portion ..........................23 Photograph 47. Looking west across the northeast project portion from the northeast project portion........24 Photograph 48. Looking east across the graded and excavated area ............................................................24 Photograph 49. Looking south along the gravel road within the graded and excavated area .......................25 Photograph 50. Looking southwest across the graded and excavated area...................................................25 Photograph 51. Looking west across the graded and excavated area. ..........................................................26 Photograph 52. Looking north along the access road within the northeast project portion ..........................26 Photograph 53. Looking west across the graded and excavated area ...........................................................27 Photograph 54. Looking south along the access road within the northeast project portion. .........................27 i Page 135 Photograph 55. Looking at an example of the BtC soils within the graded and excavated area ...................28 Photograph 56. Looking southeast across the graded and excavated area ....................................................28 Photograph 57. Looking east across the graded and excavated area ............................................................29 Photograph 58. Looking northeast across the graded and excavated area ....................................................29 Photograph 59. Looking northeast across the graded and excavated area ....................................................30 Photograph 60. Looking north across the graded and excavated area ..........................................................30 Photograph 61. Looking northwest across the northwest project portion.....................................................31 Photograph 62. Looking west across the northwest project portion .............................................................31 Photograph 63. Looking southwest across the east central project portion ..................................................32 Photograph 64. Looking southwest across the east central project portion ..................................................32 Photograph 65. Looking north across the graded and excavated area .........................................................33 Photograph 66. Looking northeast across the graded and excavated area ....................................................33 Photograph 67. Looking east across the graded and excavated area ............................................................34 Photograph 68. Looking southeast across the graded and excavated area ....................................................34 Photograph 69. Looking southeast across the graded and excavated area ...................................................35 Photograph 70. Looking south across the graded and excavated area ..........................................................35 ii Page 136 Figure 13. Location and orientation of all project photographs (Adapted from a base map provided by Keplinger and Freeman Associates). iii Page 137 Photograph 1. Looking southwest along Lakeshore Road from the southeast project corner. Photograph 2. Looking northwest from Lakeshore Road across the southeast project corner. 1 Page 138 Photograph 3. Looking northwest at the yard of the private home within the southeast project corner. Photograph 4. Looking southeast along Lakeshore Road from the southeast project corner. 2 Page 139 Photograph 5. Looking west from the access road along the southern project border. Photograph 6. Looking north along the access road leading from Lakeshore Road. 3 Page 140 Photograph 7. Looking east across the rear yard of the private home within the southeast project corner. Photograph 8. Looking north along the access road along the eastern project border. 4 Page 141 Photograph 9. Looking southeast across the rear yard of the private home within the southeast project corner. Photograph 10. Looking south across the rear yard of the private home within the southeast project corner. 5 Page 142 Photograph 11. Looking south across the rear yard of the private home along the access road to Lakeshore Road. Photograph 12. Looking southeast across the southeast project portion. 6 Page 143 Photograph 13. Looking south across the southeast project portion. Photograph 14. Looking west across the southeast project portion. 7 Page 144 Photograph 15. Looking northwest along the gravel road within the southeast project portion. Photograph 16. Looking northwest across the southern project portion. 8 Page 145 Photograph 17. Looking north across the eastern project portion. Photograph 18. Looking east across the southeast project portion. 9 Page 146 Photograph 19. Looking southwest across the access road to Mud Mill Road within the southeast project portion. Photograph 20. Looking north along the western project border from the southwest project portion. 10 Page 147 Photograph 21. Looking northeast across the southern project portion from the southwest project portion. Photograph 22. Looking east across the southern project portion from the southwest project portion. 11 Page 148 Photograph 23. Looking east across the southern project portion from the southwest project portion. Photograph 24. Looking south along the western project border at the southwest project portion. 12 Page 149 Photograph 25. Looking west along the access road to Beach Road within the northwest project portion. Photograph 26. Looking north along the western project border at the northwest project portion. 13 Page 150 Photograph 27. Looking northeast across the northwest project portion from the northwest project portion. Photograph 28. Looking east across the northwest project portion from the northwest project portion. 14 Page 151 Photograph 29. Looking east across the northwest project portion from the northwest project portion. Photograph 30. Looking southeast across the northwest project portion from the northwest project portion. 15 Page 152 Photograph 31. Looking south along the western project border from the northwest project portion. Photograph 32. Looking north along the western project border from the northwest project portion. 16 Page 153 Photograph 33. Looking south along the western project border from the northwest project portion. Photograph 34. Looking west along the existing sewer line within the northern project portion. 17 Page 154 Photograph 35. Looking southwest across the northern project portion from the northern project portion. Photograph 36. Looking south across the northern project portion from the northern project portion. 18 Page 155 Photograph 37. Looking southeast across the northern project portion from the northern project portion. Photograph 38. Looking east along the existing sewer line within the northern project portion. 19 Page 156 Photograph 39. Looking west along the existing sewer line within the northern project portion. Photograph 40. Looking east along the existing sewer line within the northern project portion. 20 Page 157 Photograph 41. Looking south across the northern project portion from the northern project portion. Photograph 42. Looking east across the northern project portion from the northern project portion. 21 Page 158 Photograph 43. Looking northeast across the northern project portion from the northern project portion. Photograph 44. Looking southeast across the northeast project portion from the northeast project portion. 22 Page 159 Photograph 45. Looking northeast across the marina within the northeast project portion. Photograph 46. Looking north along the access road within the northeast project portion. 23 Page 160 Photograph 47. Looking west across the northeast project portion from the northeast project portion. Photograph 48. Looking east across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. 24 Page 161 Photograph 49. Looking south along the gravel road within the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. Photograph 50. Looking southwest across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. 25 Page 162 Photograph 51. Looking west across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. Photograph 52. Looking north along the access road within the northeast project portion. 26 Page 163 Photograph 53. Looking west across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. Photograph 54. Looking south along the access road within the northeast project portion. 27 Page 164 Photograph 55. Looking at an example of the BtC soils on the surface within the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. Photograph 56. Looking southeast across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. 28 Page 165 Photograph 57. Looking east across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. Photograph 58. Looking northeast across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. 29 Page 166 Photograph 59. Looking northeast across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. Photograph 60. Looking north across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. 30 Page 167 Photograph 61. Looking northwest across the northwest project portion from the east central project portion. Photograph 62. Looking west across the northwest project portion from the east central project portion. 31 Page 168 Photograph 63. Looking southwest across the east central project portion from the east central project portion. Photograph 64. Looking southwest across the east central project portion from the east central project portion. 32 Page 169 Photograph 65. Looking north across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. Photograph 66. Looking northeast across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. 33 Page 170 Photograph 67. Looking east across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. Photograph 68. Looking southeast across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. 34 Page 171 Photograph 69. Looking southeast across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. Photograph 70. Looking south across the graded and excavated area within the east central project portion. 35 Page 172 Appendix B: Shovel Test Pit Summary and Soil Profile Analysis Page 173 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 1 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 Page 174 12-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 2 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 13-20 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 3 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 13-19 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 4 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 14-21 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 5 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 12-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 6 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 11-22 DkBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 7 0-15 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 15-27 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 8 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 10-20 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 9 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 11-25 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 10 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 12-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 11 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 12-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 12 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 10-21 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 13 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 13-27 Brn (10 YR 4/3) SiLo --- 14 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 11-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 15 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 12-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 16 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 10-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 17 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 Page 1 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 13-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- Page 175 18 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 13-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 19 0-15 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 14-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 20 0-15 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 15-28 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 21 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 10-26 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 22 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 12-23 Brn (10 YR 4/3) FmSiLo --- 23 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 11-20 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 24 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 11-27 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 25 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 10-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 26 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 12-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 27 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 14-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 28 0-15 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 15-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 29 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 11-20 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 30 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 13-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 31 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 12-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 32 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 13-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 33 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 14-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- Page 2 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 34 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 12/24/2017 Page 176 12-28 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 35 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 12/24/2017 14-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 36 0-13 DkYBrn (10 YR 3/4) FSaLo --- NAW/RAK 12/24/2017 13-26 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 37 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 13-21 Brn (10 YR 4/3) FSaLo --- 38 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 13-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 39 0-13 DkYBrn (10 YR 3/4) FSaLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 13-27 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 40 0-14 DkYBrn (10 YR 3/4) FSaLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 14-33 Brn (10 YR 4/3) FSaLo --- 41 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 12-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 42 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 14-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 43 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 12-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 44 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 13-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 45 0-15 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 15-37 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 46 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 13-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 47 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 12-33 Brn (10 YR 4/3) SiLo --- 48 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 12-24 Brn (10 YR 4/3) FmSiLo --- 49 0-15 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 15-26 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 50 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 Page 3 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 10-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- Page 177 51 0-15 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 15-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 52 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 11-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 53 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 14-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 54 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 10-20 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 55 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 10-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 56 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 11-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 57 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 12-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 58 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 13-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 59 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 13-28 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 60 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 12-27 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 61 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 10-29 Brn (10 YR 4/3) SiLo --- 62 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 13-20 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) SiLo --- 63 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 11-33 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 64 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 14-25 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 65 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 10-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 66 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 14-33 Brn (10 YR 4/3) SiLo --- Page 4 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 67 0-15 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 Page 178 15-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 68 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 13-34 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 69 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 14-25 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 70 0-15 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 15-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 71 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 10-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 72 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/20/2018 13-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 73 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/20/2018 13-32 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 74 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW/RAK 01/20/2018 12-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 75 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 12-31 Brn (10 YR 4/3) FSaLo --- 76 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 13-34 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 77 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 14-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 78 0-16 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 16-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 79 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 14-25 Brn (10 YR 4/3) FSaLo --- 80 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 11-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 81 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 13-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 82 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 13-23 Brn (10 YR 4/3) FmSiLo --- 83 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 Page 5 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 12-30 Brn (10 YR 4/3) SiLo --- Page 179 84 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 14-25 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 85 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 10-30 Brn (10 YR 4/3) FmSiLo --- 86 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 13-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 87 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 10-28 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 88 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 13-20 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 89 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 9-26 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 90 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 10-27 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 91 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 12-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 92 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 10-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 93 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 13-32 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 94 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 9-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 95 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 11-21 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 96 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 14-33 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 97 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 12-21 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 98 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 11-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 99 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 12-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- Page 6 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 100 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 Page 180 13-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 101 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 13-26 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 102 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 11-28 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 103 0-15 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/21/2018 15-34 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 104 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/21/2018 13-33 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 105 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK/NAW 01/21/2018 12-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 106 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/22/108 14-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 107 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/22/108 11-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 108 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/22/108 12-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 109 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/22/108 10-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 110 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/22/108 14-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 111 0-16 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/22/108 16-33 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FSaLo --- 112 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/22/108 9-21 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) SiLo --- 113 0-7 DkYBrn (10 YR 3/4) SiLo --- NAW 01/22/108 7-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSiLo --- 114 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/22/108 10-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 115 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- NAW 01/22/108 10-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 116 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- RAK 01/22/108 Page 7 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 11-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- Page 181 117 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW/RAK 01/22/108 13-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 118 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/27/2018 10-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 119 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- NAW 01/27/2018 10-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSiLo --- 120 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/27/2018 11-28 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 121 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/27/2018 12-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSiLo --- 122 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/27/2018 10-20 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 123 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/27/2018 14-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 124 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/27/2018 11-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 125 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/27/2018 12-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FSaLo --- 126 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/27/2018 11-19 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 127 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/27/2018 11-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 128 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/27/2018 11-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 129 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 12-32 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 130 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 12-32 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 131 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 14-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FSaLo --- 132 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 13-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- Page 8 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 133 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 Page 182 13-33 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 134 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 10-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 135 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 13-33 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) SiLo --- 136 0-12 DkYBrn (10 YR 3/4) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 12-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 137 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 13-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 138 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 11-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSiLo --- 139 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 9-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 140 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 11-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 141 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 14-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 142 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 12-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 143 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 13-33 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSiLo --- 144 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 14-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 145 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 11-34 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSiLo --- 146 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 14-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSiLo --- 147 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 9-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 148 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 11-28 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSiLo --- 149 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 Page 9 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 9-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- Page 183 150 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FmSiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 11-26 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSiLo --- 151 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 11-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 152 0-7 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 7-21 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 153 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 9-27 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 154 0-10 DKBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 10-31 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 155 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 12-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FSaLo --- 156 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 13-34 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 157 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 11-28 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FSaLo --- 158 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 12-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 159 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 13-34 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FSaLo --- 160 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 12-20 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 161 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 12-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 162 0-12 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 12-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 163 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 10-32 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 164 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 10-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 165 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 9-21 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- Page 10 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 166 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/28/2018 Page 184 11-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 167 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/28/2018 9-21 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) SiLo --- 168 0-11 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW/RAK 01/28/2018 11-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 169 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/29/2018 14-33 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 170 0-13 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- NAW 01/29/2018 13-34 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 171 0-14 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) FSaLo --- RAK 01/29/2018 14-35 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FSaLo --- 172 0-7 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/29/2018 7-26 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 173 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/29/2018 9-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 174 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/29/2018 10-26 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 175 0-7 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/29/2018 7-28 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) SiLo --- 176 0-8 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/29/2018 8-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 177 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/29/2018 9-21 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 178 0-6 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/29/2018 6-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 179 0-7 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/29/2018 7-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSilo --- 180 0-8 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/29/2018 8-23 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) SiLo --- 181 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/29/2018 9-27 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 182 0-10 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/29/2018 Page 11 18FR01_phaseIB_field_results 2/4/2018 STP # Depth (cm) Soil Color Soil Texture Artifact Summary Excavator(s) Date 10-21 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- Page 185 183 0-7 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/29/2018 7-20 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 184 0-8 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/29/2018 8-24 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 185 0-6 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/29/2018 6-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 186 0-7 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/29/2018 7-29 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 187 0-9 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK 01/29/2018 9-30 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/6) FmSiLo --- 188 0-5 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- NAW 01/29/2018 5-25 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- 189 0-7 DkBrn (10 YR 3/3) SiLo --- RAK/NAW 01/29/2018 7-22 DkYBrn (10 YR 4/4) FmSiLo --- KEY Brn-Brown Dk-Dark F-Fine Fm-Firm Lo-Loam Sa-Sandy Si-Silt Y-Yellowish Page 12 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Project Summary DRAFT 9/10/2021 1. Project SSC Cicero, LLC 2. Project Number 3101-21-02B 3. Location Cicero 4. School District North Syracuse School District 6. Project Type New Construction 5. Tax Parcel(s) 099.-01-31.2 0 7.Total Project Cost $ 4,500,000 8. Total Jobs 0 Land $ 3,500 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ - 8B: Job Creation 0 Building $ 300,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ 4,153,500 Equipment Subject to NYS Production $ - Exemption Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 17,000 Financial Charges $ 16,000 Legal Fees $ 10,000 Other- Solar Installation Labor $ - Cost Benefit Analysis SSC Cicero, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Abatement Cost $ 33,049 Sales Tax $ - Mortgage Tax $ - Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $ 33,049 New Investment $ 5,873,383 PILOT Payments $ 880,833 Project Wages (10 years) $ - Construction Wages $ 435,300 SSC Cicero, LLC is proposing to build a 5 mega-watt solar facility at 5827 McKinley Rd., Cicero, NY. The lot is 56.89 acres and the project acreage under the array is 55.5 acres. Employee Benefits (10 years) $ - Project Capital Investment $ 4,500,000 Agency Fees $ 57,250 Agency Legal Fees $ 11,250 Benefit:Cost Ratio 178 :1 Page 207 SSC Cicero, LLC 2/26/2021 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet DRAFT Current Revenue Generated by Parcel $ 11,828 Expected Revenue from the Parcel if no project occurred $ 386,429.84 Projected Year 1 Revenue to be generated as a result of the project: $27,500 Total Project Cost $ 4,500,000.00 OCIDA Estimate of Project Value $ 1,038,375.00 Projected MW to be generated 5 North Syracuse Full Tax Payment without Year Onondaga County Cicero Total PILOT Net Exemption School District PILOT 15.3% 15.4% 69.4% 100.0% 2019-2020 $ 1,807 $ 1,818 $ 8,203 $ 11,828 1 $ 4,202 $ 4,227 $ 19,072 $ 27,500 $ 12,064 $ (15,436) 2 $ 4,286 $ 4,311 $ 19,453 $ 28,050 $ 12,306 $ (15,744) 3 $ 4,371 $ 4,397 $ 19,842 $ 28,611 $ 12,552 $ (16,059) 4 $ 4,459 $ 4,485 $ 20,239 $ 29,183 $ 12,803 $ (16,381) 5 $ 4,548 $ 4,575 $ 20,644 $ 29,767 $ 13,059 $ (16,708) 6 $ 4,639 $ 4,667 $ 21,057 $ 30,362 $ 13,320 $ (17,042) 7 $ 4,732 $ 4,760 $ 21,478 $ 30,969 $ 13,586 $ (17,383) 8 $ 4,826 $ 4,855 $ 21,907 $ 31,589 $ 13,858 $ (17,731) 9 $ 4,923 $ 4,952 $ 22,345 $ 32,221 $ 14,135 $ (18,085) 10 $ 5,021 $ 5,051 $ 22,792 $ 32,865 $ 14,418 $ (18,447) 11 $ 5,122 $ 5,152 $ 23,248 $ 33,522 $ 14,706 $ (18,816) 12 $ 5,224 $ 5,255 $ 23,713 $ 34,193 $ 15,000 $ (19,192) 13 $ 5,329 $ 5,361 $ 24,187 $ 34,877 $ 15,300 $ (19,576) 14 $ 5,435 $ 5,468 $ 24,671 $ 35,574 $ 15,606 $ (19,968) 15 $ 5,544 $ 5,577 $ 25,165 $ 36,286 $ 15,918 $ (20,367) 16 $ 5,655 $ 5,689 $ 25,668 $ 37,011 $ 64,408 $ 27,397 17 $ 5,768 $ 5,802 $ 26,181 $ 37,752 $ 65,696 $ 27,945 18 $ 5,883 $ 5,918 $ 26,705 $ 38,507 $ 67,010 $ 28,504 19 $ 6,001 $ 6,037 $ 27,239 $ 39,277 $ 68,350 $ 29,074 20 $ 6,121 $ 6,158 $ 27,784 $ 40,062 $ 69,717 $ 29,655 21 $ 6,243 $ 6,281 $ 28,339 $ 40,864 $ 71,112 $ 30,248 22 $ 6,368 $ 6,406 $ 28,906 $ 41,681 $ 72,534 $ 30,853 23 $ 6,496 $ 6,534 $ 29,484 $ 42,514 $ 73,985 $ 31,470 24 $ 6,626 $ 6,665 $ 30,074 $ 43,365 $ 75,464 $ 32,100 25 $ 6,758 $ 6,798 $ 30,676 $ 44,232 $ 76,974 $ 32,742 $ 134,580 $ 135,383 $ 610,870 $ 880,833 $ 913,883 $ 33,049 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPLICATION FOR BENEFITS 1. Fill in all blanks using “none”, “not applicable” or “not available”. If you have any questions about the way to respond, please call the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency at 315-435-3770. 2. If providing an estimate put “(est.)” after the figure or answer. If more space is needed to answer any specific question, attach a separate sheet. 3. If the OCIDA Board approves benefits, it is the company’s responsibility to obtain and submit all necessary forms and documents. (ST-60, PILOT Agreement) 4. When completed, return this Application by mail or fax to the Agency at the address indicated below. A signed application may also be submitted electronically in PDF format to Nate Stevens at nstevens@ongov.net. An Application will not be considered by the Agency until the Application fee has been received. 5. The Agency will not give final approval for this Application until the Agency receives a completed NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form concerning the Project, which is the subject of this Application. The form is available at http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html. 6. Please note the Public Officers Law declares all records in the possession of the OCIDA (with certain limited exceptions) are open to public inspection and copying. If the Applicant is of the opinion that there are elements of the Project which are in the nature of trade secrets which, if disclosed to the public or otherwise widely disseminated, would cause substantial injury to the Applicant’s competitive position, this Applicant must identify such elements in writing and request that such elements be kept confidential. In accordance with Article 6 of the Public Officer’s Law, the OCIDA may also redact personal, private, and/or proprietary information from publicly disseminated documents. 7. The Applicant will be required to pay the Agency Application fee and, if accepted as a project of the agency, all administrative and legal fees as stated in Section VI of the Application. 8. A complete application consists of the following 9 items: x This Application x Local Access Agreement x Employment Plan x Conflict of Interest x A feasibility statement indicating the need for the requested benefits x Description of project, Site Plans/Sketches, and Maps x NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form x A check payable to the Agency in the amount of $1,000 x A check payable to Barclay Damon LLP in the amount of $2,500 9. This Application was adopted by the OCIDA Board on November 19, 2019. ‘†ƒ‰ƒ ‘—–› †—•–”‹ƒŽ ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– ‰‡ › ƒ‰‡ ͳ Page 209 85-4266422 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Section III: Construction A) Project Costs and Finances Description of Costs Total % of Total Total Private Expenditure Budget Budget to be (should be less than or Amount Procured in equal to total budget Onondaga amount) County Land Acquisition $3,500 (est ) 0% (est ) $3,500 (est ) Site Work/Demo None (est ) 0% (est ) 0% (est ) Building Construction & Renovation $300,000 (est.) 10% (est.) $30,000 (est.) Furniture & Fixtures None (est ) 0% (est ) Equipment $4,153,500 0% (est ) 0% (est ) Equipment Subject to NYS Production Sales Tax $0 (Est.) 0% (est.) 0% (est.) Engineering/Architect $17,000 (est ) 0% (est ) $17,000 (est ) Financial Charges $16,000 (est ) 0% (est ) $16,000 (est ) Legal $10,000 (est ) 0% (est ) $10,000 (est ) Other 0% (est ) 0% (est ) 0% (est ) Management/Developer Fees 0% (est ) 0% (est ) 0% (est ) Total Project Cost 4,500,000 (est ) 0% (est ) 4,500,000 (est,) Note: Do not include OCIDA fees, OCIDA application fees or OCIDA legal fees as part of the Total Project Cost. You may attach a separate chart if needed. B) TOTAL Capital Costs $ 4,500,000 (est.) Project refinancing: estimated amount (for refinancing of existing debt only) $ Sources of Funds for Project Costs: 1. Bank Financing $ _______________ 80% (est.) 2. Equity (excluding equity that is attributed to grants/tax credits) $ 20% (est.) 3. Tax Exempt Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ _______________ None (est.) 4. Taxable Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ None (est.) ‘†ƒ‰ƒ ‘—–› †—•–”‹ƒŽ ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– ‰‡ › ƒ‰‡ ͹ Page 215 4,500,000 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Section IV: Estimate of Real Property Tax Abatement Benefits Section IV of this Application will be: (i) completed by IDA Staff based upon information contained within the Application, and (ii) provided to the Applicant for ultimate inclusion as part of this completed Application prior to the completed application being provided to the OCIDA Board. A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet OCIDA estimate of current value New construction and renovation costs OCIDA estimate of increase in value OCIDA estimated value of completed project OCIDA estimate of taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur Scheduled PILOT payments PILOT Exemption County Local School Total Full Tax Net Exemption Year % PILOT PILOT PILOT PILOT Payment Amount Amount Amount w/o PILOT 1 100 2 90 3 80 4 70 5 60 6 50 7 40 8 30 9 20 10 10 TOTAL Estimates provided are based on current property tax rates and assessment value (current as of date of application submission) and have been calculated by IDA staff ‘†ƒ‰ƒ ‘—–› †—•–”‹ƒŽ ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– ‰‡ › ƒ‰‡ ͳͳ Page 219 Section V: Local Access Policy Agreement In absence of a waiver permitting otherwise, every project seeking the assistance of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (Agency) must use local general contractors, sub- contractors, and labor for one-hundred percent (100%) of the construction of new, expanded, or renovated facilities. The project’s construction or project manager need not be a local company. Noncompliance may result in the revocation and/or recapture of all benefits extended to the project by the Agency. Local Labor is defined as laborers permanently residing in the State of New York counties of Cayuga, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, Tompkins, and Wayne. Local (General/Sub) Contractor is defined as a contractor operating a permanent office in the State of New York counties of Cayuga, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, Tompkins and Wayne. The Agency may determine on a case-by-case basis to waive the Local Access Policy for a project or for a portion of a project where consideration of warranty issues, necessity of specialized skills, significant cost differentials between local and non-local services or other compelling circumstances exist. The procedure to address a local labor waiver can be found in the OCIDA handbook, which is available upon request. Prior to issuance of any NYS Tax & Finance ST-60 forms, the Applicant must submit a Contractor Status Report to the Agency. In consideration of the extension of financial assistance by the Agency SSC Cicero LLC (the Company) understands the Local Access Policy and agrees to complete Appendix C of the Agency’s application at the time of the application to the Agency and as part of a request to extend the valid date of the Agency’s tax-exempt certificate for the Project. The Company understands that an Agency tax-exempt certificate is typically valid for 12 months from the effective date of the project inducement and extended thereafter upon request by the Company. The Company further understands that any request for a waiver to this policy must be submitted in writing and approved by the Agency. I agree to the conditions of this agreement and certify all information provided regarding the construction and employment activities for the project as of 11.11.2020 (date). Company: SSC Cicero LLC Representative for Contract: John H Switzer, Esq. __ Address: 334 Arapahoe Dr City: Boulder State: CO Zip: 80302 Phone: 516.866.8234 Email: john@summitsolarcapital.com Project Address: 5827 McKinley Rd City: Cicero State: NY Zip: 13029 General Contractor: Not Available Contact Person: Not Available Address: Not Available City: Not Available State: Not Available Zip: Not Available Phone: Not Available Email: Not Available Authorized Representative: Not Available Title: Not Available Signature: ‘†ƒ‰ƒ ‘—–› †—•–”‹ƒŽ ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– ‰‡ › ƒ‰‡ ͳʹ Page 220 Section VI: Agency Fee Schedule Payment Terms: Application & Processing Fee (payable at the time of application): $1,000 Legal Deposit (payable at the time of application): $2,500 Agency Fee for Bond Projects: Payable at Closing Agency and Legal Fees for all other projects: Due and Payable at Inducement * A sales tax certificate (ST-60) will not be issued until the Agency Fee is Paid in Full Agency Fees: The project cost is the Total Project Cost from section III A Benefit Sought Fee Charged Mortgage Recording Tax and/or Sales Tax exemptions: 0.01 X the project cost Additional Fee for PILOT Agreement Projects: 0.0025 X the project cost Fee for bond financing, refinancing & refunding: 0.0025 X the project cost Note: For Manufacturing Projects under $10 million the fee is reduced by: 0.0025 X the project cost Agency Legal Fees: The project cost is the Total Project Cost from section III A Fee for first $20 million: 0.0025 of the project cost Fee for expenses above $20 million: 0.00125 of the project cost In addition to the foregoing, Applicants are responsible for payment of all costs and expenses incurred by OCIDA in connection with application or Project including without limitation publication, copying costs, SEQRA compliance and fees and costs to OCIDA’s attorneys, engineers, and consultants. OCIDA reserves the right to require a deposit to cover anticipated costs. Application fees are payable at time application/request is submitted. All fees are non-refundable. Applicants for bond transactions are responsible for payment of a Bond Issuance Charge payable to the State of New York. Applicants are also responsible for payment of post-closing fees and costs associated with the appointment of additional agents. OCIDA reserves the right to modify this schedule at any time and assess fees and charges in connection with other transactions such as grants of easement or lease or sale of OCIDA-owned property. ‘†ƒ‰ƒ ‘—–› †—•–”‹ƒŽ ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– ‰‡ › ƒ‰‡ ͳ͵ Page 221 Section VII: Recapture of Tax Abatement/Exemptions Information to be Provided by Companies: Each Company agrees that to receive benefits from the Agency it must, whenever requested by the Agency or required under applicable statutes or project documents, provide and certify or cause to be provided and certified such information concerning the Company, its finances, its employees and other topics which shall, from time to time, be necessary or appropriate, including but not limited to, such information as to enable the Agency to make any reports required by law or governmental regulation. Recapture of Benefits: It is the policy of the Agency to recapture the value of a PILOT, any sales and use tax exemption, and mortgage recording tax exemption in accordance with the Laws of the State and the provisions contained herein. Before receiving benefits, the Company must attest in writing to its understanding of, and agreement to, the recapture provisions contained in State Law and herein. To the extent permitted by State law, the recapture provisions contained herein may be modified from time to time by the Agency at its sole discretion. Recapture of a PILOT, Sales Tax and the Mortgage Recording Tax Exemptions: If the number of full time equivalent jobs to be maintained or created in connection with a project falls below 75% of the number projected in the Company’s application to the Agency, or if there are material violations of the project agreements, then the value of the property tax, sales and use tax and mortgage recording tax benefits extended to the project by the Agency may be subject to recapture. When deciding whether or not to recapture benefits and the amount of such recapture, the Agency may consider the potential future benefit of the business to the community. Recapture Payment: The recapture payment paid by the Company to the Agency shall be determined (1) by the difference between any PILOT payments made by the Company and the property taxes that would have been paid by the Company if the property were not under the supervision, jurisdiction or control of the Agency, (2) the value of any mortgage recording tax exemption, if awarded to the Company and (3) the amount of sales and use tax that would have been paid if an exemption was not granted. Recapture of the PILOT, Sales Tax or Mortgage Recording Tax: The Recapture Schedule for a Payment in Lieu of Tax Agreement, Sales Tax or the Mortgage Recording Tax is as follows: Time from Project Completion Tax Savings Recaptured 1 Year 80% 2 Years 60% 3 Years 40% 4 Years 20% 5 Years 10% Distribution of the Recapture Payment: Any funds recaptured as a result of the recapture payment shall be distributed to the affected taxing jurisdictions in the same proportion as if the payments were paid or owed by the Company on the date of recapture. ‘†ƒ‰ƒ ‘—–› †—•–”‹ƒŽ ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– ‰‡ › ƒ‰‡ ͳͶ Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 NYS Department of Labor: Roy Jewell Associate Business Service Representative 450 South Salina Street, Syracuse, NY 13202 315-479-3362 roy.jewell@labor.ny.gov www.labor.ny.gov CNY Works Chris Kennedy Business Development Specialist 960 James Street, Syracuse, NY 13203 315-477-6974 ckennedy@cnyworks.com www.cnyworks.com ‘†ƒ‰ƒ ‘—–› †—•–”‹ƒŽ ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– ‰‡ › ƒ‰‡ ͳ͹ Page 225 Page 226 Section X: Representations, Certifications, and Indemnification John H. Switzer, Esq. (Name of CEO or other authorized representative of Applicant) confirms and says that he/she is the ____________________ Managing Member (title) of ____________________ SSC Cicero LLC (name of corporation or other entity) named in the attached Application (the “Applicant”), that he/she has read the foregoing Application and knows the contents thereof, and hereby represents, understands, and otherwise agrees with the Agency and as follows: A. First Consideration for Employment: In accordance with §858-b (2) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any Financial Assistance from the Agency, except as otherwise provided by collective bargaining agreements, where practicable, the Applicant will first consider persons eligible to participate in WIA programs who shall be referred by the CNY Works for new employment opportunities created as a result of the Project. B. Other NYS Facilities: In accordance with §862 (1) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that projects which will result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant within the state is ineligible for Agency Financial Assistance, unless otherwise approved by the Agency as reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project in its respective industry or is reasonably necessary. C. Annual Sales Tax Filings: In accordance with §874(8) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any sales tax exemptions as part of the Financial Assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file, or cause to be filed, with the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, the annual form prescribed by the Department of Taxation and Finance, describing the value of all sales tax exemptions claimed by the Applicant and all consultants or subcontractors retained by the Applicant. D. Outstanding Bonds: The Applicant understands and agrees to provide on an annual basis any information regarding bonds, if any, issued by the Agency for the project that is requested by the Comptroller of the State of New York. E. Employment Reports: The Applicant understands and agrees that, if the Project receives any financial assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file with the Agency, at least annually or as otherwise required by the Agency, reports regarding the number of people employed at the project site, salary levels, contractor utilization and such other information (collectively, “Employment Reports”) that may be required from time to time on such appropriate forms as designated by the Agency. Failure to provide Employment Reports within 30 days of an Agency request shall be an Event of Default under the PILOT Agreement between the Agency and Applicant and, if applicable, an Event of Default under the Agent Agreement between the Agency and Applicant. In addition, a Notice of Failure to provide the Agency with an Employment Report may be reported to Agency board members, with said report being an agenda item subject to the open ‘†ƒ‰ƒ ‘—–› †—•–”‹ƒŽ ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– ‰‡ › ƒ‰‡ ͳͻ Page 227 meetings law. F. Absence of Conflicts of Interest: The Applicant has received from the Agency a list of the members, officers and employees of the Agency. No member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described in Section X. G. Compliance: The Applicant understands and agrees that it is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection, and environmental laws, rules, and regulations. H. The Applicant understands and agrees that the provisions of Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law, as provided below, will not be violated if financial assistance is provided for the proposed Project: § 862. Restrictions on funds of the Agency. (1) No funds of the Agency shall be used in respect of any project if the completion thereof would result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant located within the state, provided, however, that neither restriction shall apply if the agency shall determine on the basis of the application before it that the project is reasonably necessary to discourage the project occupant from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the state or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project occupant in its respective industry. I. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the owner, occupant or operator receiving financial assistance for the proposed Project is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection and environmental laws, rules and regulations. J. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the submission of any knowingly false or knowingly misleading information may lead to the immediate termination of any financial assistance and the reimbursement of an amount equal to all or part of any tax exemption claimed by reason of the Agency’s involvement in the Project. K. The Applicant confirms and hereby acknowledges that as of the date of this Application, the Applicant is in substantial compliance with all provisions of Article 18-A of the New York General Municipal Law, including, but not limited to, the provision of Section 859- a and Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law. L. The Applicant and the individual executing this Application on behalf of Applicant acknowledge that the Agency and its counsel will rely on the representations and covenants made in this Application when acting hereon and hereby represents that the statements made herein do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact and do not omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement contained herein not misleading. ‘†ƒ‰ƒ ‘—–› †—•–”‹ƒŽ ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– ‰‡ › ƒ‰‡ ʹͲ Page 228 M. The OCIDA has the right to request and inspect supporting documentation regarding attestations made on this application. N. Hold Harmless Agreement: Applicant hereby releases Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency and the members, officers, servants, agents and employees thereof (the "Agency") from, agrees that the Agency shall not be liable for, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Agency harmless from and against any and all liability arising from or expense incurred by: (A) the Agency's examination and processing of, and action pursuant to or upon, the attached Application, regardless of whether or not the Application or the Project described therein or the tax-exemptions and other assistance requested therein are favorably acted upon by the Agency; (B) the Agency's acquisition, construction, and/or installation of the Project described therein and (C) any further action taken by the Agency with respect to the Project, including without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all cause of action and attorney's fees and any other expenses incurred in defending any suits or action which may arise as a result of any of the foregoing. If, for any reason, the Applicant fails to conclude or consummate necessary negotiations, or fails, within a reasonable or specified period of time, to take reasonable, proper or requested action, or withdraws, abandons, cancels or neglects the Application, or if the Agency or the Applicant are unable to reach final agreement with respect to the Project, then, and in the event, upon presentation of an invoice itemizing the same, the Applicant shall pay to the Agency, its agents or assigns, all costs incurred by the Agency in the process of the Application, including attorney's fees, if any. ‘†ƒ‰ƒ ‘—–› †—•–”‹ƒŽ ‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– ‰‡ › ƒ‰‡ ʹͳ Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Pursuant to Section II – Part D Project Narrative This 5.0-MWac solar facility is located at 5827 McKinley Rd., Cicero, NY 13029. Existing lot size is 56.89 acres in total size and the project acreage under the array is 55.5 acres. This site is currently undeveloped vacant land and is being managed by the landowner. Upon completion of the project the site will become the location of a ground mounted solar array.  Solar panel height will not exceed 15’.  Two rows of 5’ tall white spruce and/or norway spruce on a 10’ spacing are included in the project to provide a visual screening from abutting residences.  Perimeter fencing will enclose the solar panels and electrical equipment. As a community solar project, local residents, businesses, and municipalities within Onondaga County will have the option of subscribing to purchase discounted energy from this project. Applicant has extensive experience in the responsible development of utility-scale solar projects and the ability to deliver a turn-key solar power operating facility of the highest quality. Without the benefits requested in this application the project is not feasible. Thank you, John H. Switzer, Esq. 334 Arapahoe Ave Boulder, CO 80302 Phone: 561.866.8234 Email: John@summitsolarcapital.com Summit Solar Capital, LLC – 40 Harrison St., New York, NY 10031 – 480.252.5496 Page 234 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Project Summary DRAFT 9/15/2021 1. Project NYCANNA, LLC 2. Project Number - 3. Location East Syracuse 4. School District East Syracuse-Minoa School District 6. Project Type Renovation 5. Tax Parcel(s) 027.-02-11.0; 027.-02-11.0/1; 027.-02-11.0/3; 027.-02-11.1 Village - 7.Total Project Cost $ 15,500,000.00 8. Total Jobs 69 Land $ - 8A. Job Retention 39 Site Work $ 300,000 8B: Job Creation 30 Building $ 7,000,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ 500,000 Equipment $ 5,300,000 Equipment Subject to NYS Production Exemption $ 2,000,000 Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 200,000 Financial Charges $ - Legal Fees $ - Other $ 100,000 Cost Benefit Analysis NYCANNA, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Estimated Abatement Cost $800,000 Sales Tax Abatement $800,000 Mortgage Recording Tax Abatement $0 Real Property Tax Relief $0 New Investment $9,632,500 PILOT Payments $0 Project Wages (10 years) $0 The facility expansion consists of an additional 56,834 square feet of space, with 35,000 square Construction Wages $2,176,500 feet (est.) designated for cultivation operations, and 21,834 square feet (est.) designated for product storage, staging, shipping, and receiving. The facility is located in the Town of Dewitt Employee Benefits (10 years) $0 Project Capital Investment $7,300,000 Agency Fees $156,000 Benefit:Cost Ratio 12.04 :1 Page 235 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPLICATION FOR BENEFITS 1. Fill in all blanks using “none”, “not applicable” or “not available”. If you have any questions about the way to respond, please call the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency at 315-435-3770. 2. If providing an estimate put “(est.)” after the figure or answer. If more space is needed to answer any specific question, attach a separate sheet. 3. If the OCIDA Board approves benefits, it is the company’s responsibility to obtain and submit all necessary forms and documents. (ST-60, PILOT Agreement) 4. When completed, return this Application by mail or fax to the Agency at the address indicated below. A signed application may also be submitted electronically in PDF format to Nate Stevens at nstevens@ongov.net. An Application will not be considered by the Agency until the Application fee has been received. 5. The Agency will not give final approval for this Application until the Agency receives a completed NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form concerning the Project, which is the subject of this Application. The form is available at http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html. 6. Please note the Public Officers Law declares all records in the possession of the OCIDA (with certain limited exceptions) are open to public inspection and copying. If the Applicant is of the opinion that there are elements of the Project which are in the nature of trade secrets which, if disclosed to the public or otherwise widely disseminated, would cause substantial injury to the Applicant’s competitive position, this Applicant must identify such elements in writing and request that such elements be kept confidential. In accordance with Article 6 of the Public Officer’s Law, the OCIDA may also redact personal, private, and/or proprietary information from publicly disseminated documents. 7. The Applicant will be required to pay the Agency Application fee and, if accepted as a project of the agency, all administrative and legal fees as stated in Section VI of the Application. 8. A complete application consists of the following 9 items: This Application Local Access Agreement Employment Plan Conflict of Interest A feasibility statement indicating the need for the requested benefits Description of project, Site Plans/Sketches, and Maps NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form A check payable to the Agency in the amount of $1,000 A check payable to Barclay Damon LLP in the amount of $2,500 9. This Application was adopted by the OCIDA Board on November 19, 2019. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 1 Page 236 It is the policy of the Agency that any project receiving benefits from the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency will utilize 100% local contractors and local labor for the construction period of the project unless a waiver is granted in writing by the Agency. Return to: Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Attn: Nate Stevens 333 W. Washington Street, Suite 130 Syracuse, NY 13202 Phone: 315-435-3770 | Fax: 315-435-3669 nstevens@ongov.net Section I: Applicant Information Please answer all questions. Use “None”, “Not Applicable” and “See Attached” where necessary. A) Applicant information-company receiving benefits: Applicant Name: NYCANNA, LLC Applicant Address: 6600 New Venture Gear Dr, East Syracuse 13057 Phone: (917) 842-0570 Fax: Not Applicable https://www.shopbotanist.com/ Website: E-mail: William.lettier@acreageholdings.com Federal ID#: 30-0963283 NAICS: 325411 State and Year of Incorporation/Organization: __________________________________________ DE 11/1/2016 Will a Real Estate Holding Company be utilized to own the Project property/ facility? ☐Yes ☐No What is the name of the Real Estate Holding Company: Not Applicable Federal ID#: Not Applicable State and Year of Incorporation/Organization: Not Applicable List of stockholders, members, or partners of Real Estate Holding Company: ________________________________________________________________________________ Not Applicable B) Individual Completing Application: Name: William Lettier Title: General Manager, NYCANNA, LLC Address: 6600 New Venture Gear Dr, E Syracuse 13057 Phone: 917-842-0570 Fax: Not Applicable E-mail: William.lettier@acreageholdings.com Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 2 Page 237 C) Company Contact (if different from individual completing application): Name: Not Applicable Title: Not Applicable Address: Not Applicable Phone: Not Applicable Cell Phone: Not Applicable E-mail: Not Applicable D) Company Counsel: Name of Attorney: James A. Doherty, III, Esq. Firm Name: General Counsel, Acreage Holdings, Inc. Address: 450 Lexington Avenue, #3308 New York, NY 10163 USA Phone: 570-947-1138 Cell Phone: 570-947-1138 E-mail: legal@acreageholdings.com E) Business Organization (check appropriate category): ☐ Corporation ☐Partnership ☐ Public Corporation ☐Joint Venture ☐ Sole Proprietorship ☐Limited Liability Company Others (please specify): None Year Established: 2016 State in which Organization is established: Delaware F) List all stockholders, members, or partners with % of ownership greater than 5% : Name % of ownership High Street Capital Partners Management, LLC 100 Kevin Murphy, Manager of High Street Capital Partners Management, LLC 80 Melvin Yellin, Manager of High Street Capital Partners Management, LLC 10 Devin Binford, Manager of High Street Capital Partners Management, LLC 10 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 3 Page 238 G) Applicant Business Description: Please attach a description of your company’s background, products, customers, goods and services. Estimated % of sales within Onondaga County: _______________________________________ 79% (as of Jan to Jul 2021) Estimated % of sales outside Onondaga County but within New York State: 21% (as of Jan to Jul 2021) Estimated % of sales outside New York State but within the U.S.: 0% Estimated % of sales outside the U.S.: 0% (*Percentage to equal 100%) H) What percentage of your total annual supplies, raw materials and vendor services are purchased from firms in Onondaga County. Include list of vendors, raw material suppliers and percentages for each. Provide supporting documentation including estimated percentages of local purchases. Please attach this information. See Attachment B. I) Applicant History: If the answer to any of the following is “Yes”, please explain below. If necessary, attach additional information. 1. Is the company or management of the Company now a ☐Yes ☐No plaintiff or defendant in any civil or criminal litigation? 2. Has any person listed above ever been convicted of a criminal offense (other than a minor traffic violation)? ☐Yes ☐No 3. Has any person listed in Section I ever been in receivership or declared bankruptcy? ☐Yes ☐No Please attach any explanations: See attached. J) Has the Project Beneficiary received assistance from OCIDA, SIDA, New York State or the Onondaga Civic Development Corporation in the past? If yes please attach an explanation and please give year, project name, description of benefits and address of project. ☐Yes ☐No Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 4 Page 239 Section II: Project Information A) Project Location: Location where the investment will take place. If company is moving, the new location should be entered here and the current location should be in Section I. Address: 6600 New Venture Gear Drive Legal Address (if different): Not Applicable City: East Syracuse Village/Town: Dewitt Zip Code: 13057 School District: East Syracuse- Minoa Central School District Tax Map Parcel ID(s): 312689027.-02-11.0; 312689027.-02-11.0/1; 312689027.-02-11.0/3; 312689027.-02-11.1 Current Assessed Value: leased Sq. Footage of Existing Building: 234,000 Census Tract: 36067 B) Type (Check all that apply): ☐New construction ☐Purchase of machinery and/or equipment ☐Expansion/Addition to current facilities ☐Brownfield/Remediated Brownfield ☐Renovation of existing facility ☐LEED Certification ☐Acquisition of existing facility/property ☐Other: ☐Demolition and Construction C) Please attach a summary of how this project will help your business grow. Will it set the company up for revenue growth? Will it mitigate cost? Will it provide more flexibility? See Appendix A. D) Description of Project: Please provide a detailed narrative of the proposed Project. This narrative should include, but is not limited to: ☐ (i) the size of the Project in square feet and a breakdown of square footage per each intended use; ☐ (ii) the size of the lot upon which the Project sits or is to be constructed; ☐ (iii) the current use of the site and the intended use of the site upon completion of the Project; ☐ (iv) the principal products to be produced and/or the principal activities that will occur on the Project site; and ☐ (v) an indication as to why the Applicant is undertaking the Project and the need for the requested benefits. Please separately attach the description and any copies of site plans, sketches or maps. See Appendix A. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 5 Page 240 E) Select Project Type for all end users at Project site (you may check more than one): **Please check any and all end users as identified below ☐ Industrial ☐Bank Office ☐ Acquisition of Existing Facility ☐Retail ☐ Housing ☐Mixed Use ☐ Equipment Purchase ☐Facility for Aging ☐ Multi-Tenant ☐Civic Facility (not for profit) ☐ Commercial ☐Other F) For the Agency to consider this Project, please provide the following information: 1. Does the project consist of new construction or expansion or substantial renovation of an existing facility? ☐Yes ☐No 2. Will the project create new employment opportunities or retain existing jobs that may otherwise be lost? ☐Yes ☐No 3. Does the project beneficiary serve a customer base primarily outside of Onondaga County? ☐Yes ☐No G) Will the completion of the Project result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the company from one area of the state to another area of the state OR in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the company located within the state? Please explain if you answer “Yes” by attaching a response. ☐Yes ☐No H) Please attach a description of any compelling circumstances the Agency should be aware of while reviewing this application. I) Environmental Information 1. Please attach the appropriate Environmental Impact Forms to your application. Here is a link to the SEQR forms: a. http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html 2. Have any environmental issues been identified on the property? ☐Yes ☐No If yes, please attach an explanation. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 6 Page 241 Section III: Construction A) Project Costs and Finances Description of Costs Total % of Total Total Private Expenditure Budget Budget to be (should be less than or Amount Procured in equal to total budget Onondaga amount) County Land Acquisition Not Applicable Not Applicable Site Work/Demo 300,000 300,000 Building Construction & Renovation 7,000,000 7,000,000 Furniture & Fixtures 500,000 500,000 Equipment 5,300,000 5,300,000 Equipment Subject to NYS Production Sales Tax 2,000,000 2,000,000 Engineering/Architect Exemption 200,000 200,000 sFinancial Charges Legal Other 100,000 100,000 Management/Developer Fees 100,000 100,000 Total Project Cost 15,500,000 15,500,000 Note: Do not include OCIDA fees, OCIDA application fees or OCIDA legal fees as part of the Total Project Cost. You may attach a separate chart if needed. B) TOTAL Capital Costs $ 15,500,000 Project refinancing: estimated amount (for refinancing of existing debt only) $ Not Applicable Sources of Funds for Project Costs: 1. Bank Financing $ _______________ Not Applicable 2. Equity (excluding equity that is attributed to grants/tax credits) $ 15,500,000 3. Tax Exempt Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ _______________ Not Applicable 4. Taxable Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ Not Applicable Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 7 Page 242 5. Public Sources (Include sum total of all state and federal grants and tax credits) $ Not Applicable -Identify each state and federal grant/credit: Not Applicable $ Not Applicable $ Not Applicable $ 6. Total Sources of Funds for Project Costs $ _______________ 15,500,000 C) Employment and Payroll Information *Full Time Equivalent (FTE) is defined as one employee working no less than 40 hours per week or two or more employees together working a total of 40 hours per week. 1. Are there people currently employed at the project site? ☐Yes ☐No If yes, provide number of FTE jobs at the facility: 39 2. Complete the following: Estimate the number of FTE jobs to be retained as a result of this Project: 39 Estimate the number of construction jobs to be created by this Project: 100 Estimate the average length of construction jobs to be created (months): 6 months Current annual payroll at facility: $2,070,137 Average annual growth rate of wages: 2% Please list, if any, benefits that will be available to either full and/or part time Health Benefits, 401K, Life Insurance,Short term/Long Term Disability for FTE employees: Average annual benefit paid by the Health Benefit Premiums are paid 80% by company for any FTE company ($ or % salary) per FTE job: Average growth rate of benefit cost: Amount or percent of wage employees pay for benefits: FTE pays 20% of premiums. Provide an estimate of the number of residents in the Economic Development Region (Onondaga, Madison, Cayuga, 30 New Jobs Created Oneida, Oswego, and Cortland Counties) to fill new FTE jobs: Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 8 Page 243 D) New Employment Benefits i. Complete the following chart indicating the number of FTE jobs presently employed at the Project and the number of FTE jobs that will be created at the Project site at the end of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth years after the Project is completed. Jobs should be listed by title of category (see below), including FTE independent contractors or employees of independent contractors that work at the Project location. Do not include construction workers. ii. Feel free to include additional information or a substitute chart if you think additional material would add clarity. Current & Planned Full Salary Current Estimated Number of FTE Jobs Time Occupations (Job (Annual or Number of added each year after project Titles) Hourly) FTEs Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 completion Operations Manager 1 2 Warehouse 12 5 5 Production 21 10 5 Sales & Marketing 1 2 Finance 3 1 Human Resources 1 Job Creation Subtotal 20 10 For purposes of completing the chart, please list the job titles that will be increasing in number. If possible, please attach a brief description that outlines what each job entails. If you prefer, you may attach a job chart of your own that outlines the job growth projections regarding the project. E) Financial Assistance sought (estimated values): ☐ Real Property Tax Abatement (PILOT): none ☐ Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption (.75% of amount mortgaged): Not Applicable ☐ Sales and Use Tax Exemption (4% Local, 4% State): $800,000 ☐ Tax Exempt Bond Financing (Amount Requested): Not Applicable ☐ Taxable Bond Financing (Amount Requested): Not Applicable Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 9 Page 244 F) Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption Benefit Calculator: Amount of mortgage that would be subject to mortgage recording tax: Mortgage Amount (include sum total of construction/permanent/ bridge financing): $ Not Applicable Estimated Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption Benefit (product of mortgage amount as indicated above, multiplied by .0075): $ Not Applicable G) Sales and Use Tax Benefit Calculator: Gross amount of costs for goods and services that are subject to State and local Sales and US tax – said amount to benefit from the Agency’s Sales and Use Tax exemption benefit: $ 10,000,000 Estimated State and local Sales and Use Tax Benefit (product of 8% multiplied by the figure, above) (This should match the amount in section “E” on this page, this calculation only exists to help you with your estimate): $ 800,000 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 10 Page 245 Section IV: Estimate of Real Property Tax Abatement Benefits Section IV of this Application will be: (i) completed by IDA Staff based upon information contained within the Application, and (ii) provided to the Applicant for ultimate inclusion as part of this completed Application prior to the completed application being provided to the OCIDA Board. A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet OCIDA estimate of current value New construction and renovation costs OCIDA estimate of increase in value OCIDA estimated value of completed project OCIDA estimate of taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur Scheduled PILOT payments PILOT Exemption County Local School Total Full Tax Net Exemption Year % PILOT PILOT PILOT PILOT Payment Amount Amount Amount w/o PILOT 1 100 2 90 3 80 4 70 5 60 6 50 7 40 8 30 9 20 10 10 TOTAL Estimates provided are based on current property tax rates and assessment value (current as of date of application submission) and have been calculated by IDA staff Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 11 Page 246 Section V: Local Access Policy Agreement In absence of a waiver permitting otherwise, every project seeking the assistance of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (Agency) must use local general contractors, sub- contractors, and labor for one-hundred percent (100%) of the construction of new, expanded, or renovated facilities. The project’s construction or project manager need not be a local company. Noncompliance may result in the revocation and/or recapture of all benefits extended to the project by the Agency. Local Labor is defined as laborers permanently residing in the State of New York counties of Cayuga, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, Tompkins, and Wayne. Local (General/Sub) Contractor is defined as a contractor operating a permanent office in the State of New York counties of Cayuga, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, Tompkins and Wayne. The Agency may determine on a case-by-case basis to waive the Local Access Policy for a project or for a portion of a project where consideration of warranty issues, necessity of specialized skills, significant cost differentials between local and non-local services or other compelling circumstances exist. The procedure to address a local labor waiver can be found in the OCIDA handbook, which is available upon request. Prior to issuance of any NYS Tax & Finance ST-60 forms, the Applicant must submit a Contractor Status Report to the Agency. In consideration of the extension of financial assistance by the Agency NYCANNA, LLC (the Company) understands the Local Access Policy and agrees to complete Appendix C of the Agency’s application at the time of the application to the Agency and as part of a request to extend the valid date of the Agency’s tax-exempt certificate for the Project. The Company understands that an Agency tax-exempt certificate is typically valid for 12 months from the effective date of the project inducement and extended thereafter upon request by the Company. The Company further understands that any request for a waiver to this policy must be submitted in writing and approved by the Agency. I agree to the conditions of this agreement and certify all information provided regarding the construction and employment activities for the project as of 09/08/2021 (date). Company: Please see Appendix A, Section V. for a comment on this matter. Representative for Contract: Not Applicable __ Address: Not Applicable City: Not Applicable State: Not Applicable Zip: Not Applicable Phone: Not applicable Email: Not applicable Project Address: Not Applicable City: Not Applicable State: Not applicable Zip: Not Applicable General Contractor: Not Applicable Contact Person: Not Applicable Address: Not Applicable City: Not Applicable State: Not Applicable Zip: Not Applicable Phone: Not Applicable Email: Not Applicable Authorized Representative: Not Applicable Title: Not Applicable Signature: Not Applicable Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 12 Page 247 Section VI: Agency Fee Schedule Payment Terms: Application & Processing Fee (payable at the time of application): $1,000 Legal Deposit (payable at the time of application): $2,500 Agency Fee for Bond Projects: Payable at Closing Agency and Legal Fees for all other projects: Due and Payable at Inducement * A sales tax certificate (ST-60) will not be issued until the Agency Fee is Paid in Full Agency Fees: The project cost is the Total Project Cost from section III A Benefit Sought Fee Charged Mortgage Recording Tax and/or Sales Tax exemptions: 0.01 X the project cost Additional Fee for PILOT Agreement Projects: 0.0025 X the project cost Fee for bond financing, refinancing & refunding: 0.0025 X the project cost Note: For Manufacturing Projects under $10 million the fee is reduced by: 0.0025 X the project cost Agency Legal Fees: The project cost is the Total Project Cost from section III A Fee for first $20 million: 0.0025 of the project cost Fee for expenses above $20 million: 0.00125 of the project cost In addition to the foregoing, Applicants are responsible for payment of all costs and expenses incurred by OCIDA in connection with application or Project including without limitation publication, copying costs, SEQRA compliance and fees and costs to OCIDA’s attorneys, engineers, and consultants. OCIDA reserves the right to require a deposit to cover anticipated costs. Application fees are payable at time application/request is submitted. All fees are non-refundable. Applicants for bond transactions are responsible for payment of a Bond Issuance Charge payable to the State of New York. Applicants are also responsible for payment of post-closing fees and costs associated with the appointment of additional agents. OCIDA reserves the right to modify this schedule at any time and assess fees and charges in connection with other transactions such as grants of easement or lease or sale of OCIDA-owned property. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 13 Page 248 Section VII: Recapture of Tax Abatement/Exemptions Information to be Provided by Companies: Each Company agrees that to receive benefits from the Agency it must, whenever requested by the Agency or required under applicable statutes or project documents, provide and certify or cause to be provided and certified such information concerning the Company, its finances, its employees and other topics which shall, from time to time, be necessary or appropriate, including but not limited to, such information as to enable the Agency to make any reports required by law or governmental regulation. Recapture of Benefits: It is the policy of the Agency to recapture the value of a PILOT, any sales and use tax exemption, and mortgage recording tax exemption in accordance with the Laws of the State and the provisions contained herein. Before receiving benefits, the Company must attest in writing to its understanding of, and agreement to, the recapture provisions contained in State Law and herein. To the extent permitted by State law, the recapture provisions contained herein may be modified from time to time by the Agency at its sole discretion. Recapture of a PILOT, Sales Tax and the Mortgage Recording Tax Exemptions: If the number of full time equivalent jobs to be maintained or created in connection with a project falls below 75% of the number projected in the Company’s application to the Agency, or if there are material violations of the project agreements, then the value of the property tax, sales and use tax and mortgage recording tax benefits extended to the project by the Agency may be subject to recapture. When deciding whether or not to recapture benefits and the amount of such recapture, the Agency may consider the potential future benefit of the business to the community. Recapture Payment: The recapture payment paid by the Company to the Agency shall be determined (1) by the difference between any PILOT payments made by the Company and the property taxes that would have been paid by the Company if the property were not under the supervision, jurisdiction or control of the Agency, (2) the value of any mortgage recording tax exemption, if awarded to the Company and (3) the amount of sales and use tax that would have been paid if an exemption was not granted. Recapture of the PILOT, Sales Tax or Mortgage Recording Tax: The Recapture Schedule for a Payment in Lieu of Tax Agreement, Sales Tax or the Mortgage Recording Tax is as follows: Time from Project Completion Tax Savings Recaptured 1 Year 80% 2 Years 60% 3 Years 40% 4 Years 20% 5 Years 10% Distribution of the Recapture Payment: Any funds recaptured as a result of the recapture payment shall be distributed to the affected taxing jurisdictions in the same proportion as if the payments were paid or owed by the Company on the date of recapture. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 14 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 NYS Department of Labor: Roy Jewell Associate Business Service Representative 450 South Salina Street, Syracuse, NY 13202 315-479-3362 roy.jewell@labor.ny.gov www.labor.ny.gov CNY Works Chris Kennedy Business Development Specialist 960 James Street, Syracuse, NY 13203 315-477-6974 ckennedy@cnyworks.com www.cnyworks.com Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 17 Page 252 Page 253 Section X: Representations, Certifications, and Indemnification Robert Daino (Name of CEO or other authorized representative of Applicant) confirms and says that he/she is the ____________________ (title) of Authorized Signatory ____________________ NYCANNA, LLC (name of corporation or other entity) named in the attached Application (the “Applicant”), that he/she has read the foregoing Application and knows the contents thereof, and hereby represents, understands, and otherwise agrees with the Agency and as follows: A. First Consideration for Employment: In accordance with §858-b (2) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any Financial Assistance from the Agency, except as otherwise provided by collective bargaining agreements, where practicable, the Applicant will first consider persons eligible to participate in WIA programs who shall be referred by the CNY Works for new employment opportunities created as a result of the Project. B. Other NYS Facilities: In accordance with §862 (1) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that projects which will result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant within the state is ineligible for Agency Financial Assistance, unless otherwise approved by the Agency as reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project in its respective industry or is reasonably necessary. C. Annual Sales Tax Filings: In accordance with §874(8) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any sales tax exemptions as part of the Financial Assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file, or cause to be filed, with the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, the annual form prescribed by the Department of Taxation and Finance, describing the value of all sales tax exemptions claimed by the Applicant and all consultants or subcontractors retained by the Applicant. D. Outstanding Bonds: The Applicant understands and agrees to provide on an annual basis any information regarding bonds, if any, issued by the Agency for the project that is requested by the Comptroller of the State of New York. E. Employment Reports: The Applicant understands and agrees that, if the Project receives any financial assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file with the Agency, at least annually or as otherwise required by the Agency, reports regarding the number of people employed at the project site, salary levels, contractor utilization and such other information (collectively, “Employment Reports”) that may be required from time to time on such appropriate forms as designated by the Agency. Failure to provide Employment Reports within 30 days of an Agency request shall be an Event of Default under the PILOT Agreement between the Agency and Applicant and, if applicable, an Event of Default under the Agent Agreement between the Agency and Applicant. In addition, a Notice of Failure to provide the Agency with an Employment Report may be reported to Agency board members, with said report being an agenda item subject to the open Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 19 Page 254 meetings law. F. Absence of Conflicts of Interest: The Applicant has received from the Agency a list of the members, officers and employees of the Agency. No member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described in Section X. G. Compliance: The Applicant understands and agrees that it is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection, and environmental laws, rules, and regulations. H. The Applicant understands and agrees that the provisions of Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law, as provided below, will not be violated if financial assistance is provided for the proposed Project: § 862. Restrictions on funds of the Agency. (1) No funds of the Agency shall be used in respect of any project if the completion thereof would result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant located within the state, provided, however, that neither restriction shall apply if the agency shall determine on the basis of the application before it that the project is reasonably necessary to discourage the project occupant from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the state or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project occupant in its respective industry. I. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the owner, occupant or operator receiving financial assistance for the proposed Project is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection and environmental laws, rules and regulations. J. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the submission of any knowingly false or knowingly misleading information may lead to the immediate termination of any financial assistance and the reimbursement of an amount equal to all or part of any tax exemption claimed by reason of the Agency’s involvement in the Project. K. The Applicant confirms and hereby acknowledges that as of the date of this Application, the Applicant is in substantial compliance with all provisions of Article 18-A of the New York General Municipal Law, including, but not limited to, the provision of Section 859- a and Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law. L. The Applicant and the individual executing this Application on behalf of Applicant acknowledge that the Agency and its counsel will rely on the representations and covenants made in this Application when acting hereon and hereby represents that the statements made herein do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact and do not omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement contained herein not misleading. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 20 Page 255 M. The OCIDA has the right to request and inspect supporting documentation regarding attestations made on this application. N. Hold Harmless Agreement: Applicant hereby releases Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency and the members, officers, servants, agents and employees thereof (the "Agency") from, agrees that the Agency shall not be liable for, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Agency harmless from and against any and all liability arising from or expense incurred by: (A) the Agency's examination and processing of, and action pursuant to or upon, the attached Application, regardless of whether or not the Application or the Project described therein or the tax-exemptions and other assistance requested therein are favorably acted upon by the Agency; (B) the Agency's acquisition, construction, and/or installation of the Project described therein and (C) any further action taken by the Agency with respect to the Project, including without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all cause of action and attorney's fees and any other expenses incurred in defending any suits or action which may arise as a result of any of the foregoing. If, for any reason, the Applicant fails to conclude or consummate necessary negotiations, or fails, within a reasonable or specified period of time, to take reasonable, proper or requested action, or withdraws, abandons, cancels or neglects the Application, or if the Agency or the Applicant are unable to reach final agreement with respect to the Project, then, and in the event, upon presentation of an invoice itemizing the same, the Applicant shall pay to the Agency, its agents or assigns, all costs incurred by the Agency in the process of the Application, including attorney's fees, if any. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 21 Page 256 Page 257 Appendix A – Additional Information Section I: Applicant Information G) Applicant Business Description (include background, products, customers, goods, and services) NYCANNA, LLC, d/b/a "Acreage New York" We are a vertically integrated medical cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, retail, and distribution company located in New York. We have a manufacturing and cultivation location in East Syracuse, along with our four dispensaries located in Buffalo, Middletown, Queens, and Farmingdale. We began our journey in 2015, formed NYCANNA, LLC in 2016, and were awarded a license from the State of New York Department of health in August of 2017. We are one of only ten Registered Organizations in New York permitted to manufacture and sell medical cannabis. Our medical products include items such as tinctures, vaporization cartridges, and capsules. We currently sell our products to registered patients within New York from one of our four retail locations, from which we also provide home delivery services. H) % of Total Annual Supplies, Raw Materials, and Vendor Services Purchased from Onondaga County Firms. Include list of vendors, raw material suppliers, and % for each, along with supporting documentation including estimated % of local purchases. 2020 – 1.06%, 2021 – 1.56%, See Appendix B (Vendor spend information) I) Applicant History: On November 2, 2018, EPMMNY LLC filed a civil complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, asserting claims against 16 defendants, including NYCANNA, LLC, Case No. 655480/2018. The matter is still in its preliminary stages and NYCANNA's motion to dismiss the case is pending before the court. Section II: Project Information C) Summary of how this project will help your business grow. The project will help the NYCANNA, LLC ("NYCANNA") business grow by expanding its manufacturing and cultivation facility for increased revenue growth, cost mitigation, and overall business flexibility, improving upon its existing cannabis manufacturing facility in Syracuse, New York. Due to the rapid increase in demand for medical cannabis products, NYCANNA is undertaking this project to expand its existing manufacturing facility. NYCANNA rents 230,000 square feet (est.) of an existing manufacturing facility that sits on 109 square acres (est.) of land (see survey attached). The facility is currently zoned for manufacturing and NYCANNA intends to continue its manufacturing operations going forward, as well as adding cannabis cultivation. The facility expansion consists of an additional 56,834 square feet of space, with 35,000 square feet (est.) designated for cultivation operations, and 21,834 square feet (est.) designated for product storage, staging, shipping, and receiving. NYCANNA is requesting tax-exempt status to increase capital expenditure costs required to make the facility fully operational. Being able to remove the tax cost from our expansion will allow for more funds being allocated to growing equipment, as well as the ability to purchase higher quality equipment. Higher quality equipment will allow NYCANNA to better service the community of patients that benefit from our products. This cost Page 258 mitigation will allow NYCANNA more business flexibility and enable it to hire local Onondaga County vendors, supplies, employees, and other resources to enhance its relationship with the county and its residents and businesses. Job creation will occur each year in line with the needs of the facility, including 100 construction jobs and 30 new facility positions that will be open - 20 in the first year and an additional 10 in the second year. D) Description of Project. i. a. Total SF: 56,834 square feet b. Cultivation: 35,000 square feet c. Warehouse, shipping & receiving: 21,834 square feet ii. Approximately 109 square acres iii. Manufacturing; Manufacturing iv. Cultivation, Extraction, and Distribution of Medical Cannabis v. The demand for cannabis and cannabis products has increased and, therefore, the need to increase cultivation space is necessary. There are significant costs, specifically equipment costs, associated with these expansions, and tax-exempt status will allow for a more financially feasible and thus, successful, expansion. The project in question is an expansion of cultivation capabilities at an existing medical cannabis cultivation facility. The existing facility sits on approximately 109 square acres of land. The expansion will result in an additional 56,834 square feet, including 35,000 square feet of cannabis cultivation space and 21,834 square feet of warehouse space. The expansion will allow for increased production of cannabis flower, infused products and concentrates allowed under current New York medical cannabis regulations. We will also have the ability to produce and formulate additional products as they become allowable under state regulations. The facility is currently used for the cultivation of medicinal cannabis and the manufacturing of infused cannabis-based medicines. The project is necessary to increase the production capabilities to meet the demand of the rapidly growing Medical Cannabis patient population in the state. It is also necessary to address the upcoming anticipated demand of the recently legalized adult-use cannabis program. Historically, states which have passed adult-use cannabis laws have seen the medical programs in their state suffer as adult-use demand begins to overwhelm medical cannabis providers and decreases the availability of products for those patients who need them for recognized medical conditions. We are committed to providing access to medical patients, as well as the adult-use needs of the public. Page 259 I) Environmental Information Long form EAF – SEQR; the development of these forms is currently in process and will be submitted when completed, which is expected the week of 9.13.2021. Section V: Local Access Policy Agreement/Contractor Status Report To be submitted prior to final OCIDA approval. Page 260 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A. Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: NYCANNA Building Renovation Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): 6600 New Venture Gear Drive, East Syracuse, NY 13057 Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): The proposed project is an expansion of an existing cannabis grow facility. The expansion will include approximately 56,000 sf of interior renovation within the existing building, which will consist of new grow rooms, drying and operation areas, security systems, utilities, and new bathroom facilities. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: 917-842-0570 NYCANNA, LLC d/b/a "Acreage New York" (c/o William Letter) E-Mail: william.lettier@acreageholdings.com Address: 6600 New Venture Gear Dr City/PO: East Syracuse State: Zip Code: NY 13057 Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: ONX1, LLC E-Mail: Address: PO Box 2279 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Jupiter FL 33468 Page 1 of 13 Page 261 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City o n l Town oar , ✔ 9 Yes 9 No DOB Building Permit Sept. 14, 2021 or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Planning Board or Commission c. City Town or 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies 9 Yes ✔ 9 No e. County agencies 9 Yes 9 No Oct 2021 ✔ OCIDA f. Regional agencies 9 Yes ✔ 9 No g. State agencies 9 Yes 9 No ✔ Approval of License Transfer h. Federal agencies 9 Yes ✔ 9 No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the 9 Yes ✔ 9 No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. • If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site 9 Yes 9 No ✔ where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action 9 Yes 9 No ✔ would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 13 Page 262 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. 9 Yes 9 No ✔ If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? East ________________________________________________________________ Syracuse Minoa b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Town of Dewitt c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Town of Dewitt d. What parks serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Town of Dewitt __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? Commerical _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? _____________ 109 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? _____________ zero acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _____________ 109 acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No iii. Number of lots proposed? ________ iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ Will t proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? 9 Yes ✔9 No i. If No, anticipated period of construction: _____ months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated _____ • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year • Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 13 Page 263 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 f. Does the project include new residential uses? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any 9 Yes ✔ 9 No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: 9 Ground water 9 Surface water streams 9 Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ • Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? 9 Yes ✔9 No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment 9 Yes ✔9 No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 Page 264 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will t proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes ✔9 No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will t proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: • acr of a atic vegetation proposed to be removed ___________________________________________________________ • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion ________________________________________ • purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? ✔9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ 7,750 gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ✔9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________ OCWA • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ✔9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district? ✔9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ✔9 Yes 9 No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If, Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ • Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ • Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), at i t maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ✔9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ 775 gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ sanitary sewer _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ✔9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ OCDWEP • Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ Town of Dewitt • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ✔9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district? ✔9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Page 5 of 13 Page 265 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ • Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? 9 Yes ✔9 No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes ✔9 No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ • Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point 9 Yes ✔9 No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ • If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? 9 Yes 9 No iv. Does t proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? 9 Yes 9 No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel 9 Yes ✔9 No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet 9 Yes 9 No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: • ___________Tons/year ( ort ton ) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) • ___________Tons/year ( ort ton ) of Nitrous Oxide (N2 ) • ___________Tons/year ( ort ton ) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) • ___________Tons/year ( ort ton ) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) • ___________Tons/year ( ort ton ) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflo rocarbons (H ) • ___________Tons/year ( ort ton ) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 6 of 13 Page 266 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, 9 Yes ✔9 No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as 9 Yes ✔ 9 No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial 9 Yes ✔ 9 No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): † Morning † Evening †Weekend † Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day an t p i trail r an p tr c iii. Parking spaces: Existing _____________ Proposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________ i . o t propo action incl an ar par in o v. t propo action incl an o i ication o i tin roa cr ation o n roa or c an in i tin acc cri vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? 9 Yes 9 No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric 9 Yes 9 No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing 9 Yes 9 No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand 9 Yes 9 No ✔ for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3,907 MWh ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ national grid iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade to an existing substation? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday - Friday: _________________________ 7am-7pm • Monday - Friday: ____________________________ 24 hours • Saturday: ________________________________ - • Saturday: ___________________________________ 24 hours • Sunday: _________________________________ - • Sunday: ____________________________________ 24 hours • Holidays: ________________________________ - • Holidays: ___________________________________ 24 hours Page 7 of 13 Page 267 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will t proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? 9 Yes 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Existing security lighting (building mounted and parking lot lighting) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (co in capacit o over 1,100 gallons) 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or chemical products allon in a o ro n tora or an a o nt in n r ro n tora ? If Yes: i. Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year) iii. Generally describe t proposed storage facilities ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, ✔ Yes 9 No 9 insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ agricultural operations will use state approved pesticides (ZeroTol 2.0, Procidic 2, Lost Coast Plant Therapy). ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal ✔ 9 Yes 9 No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: ____________________ concrete and soil - 550 tons per ________________ month for 1 month (unit of time) • Operation : ____________________ 1 tons per ________________ month (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ N/A ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ N/A ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ Private Waste Hauler ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ Private Waste Hauler ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 13 Page 268 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • ________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or • ________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will t proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous 9 Yes ✔ 9 No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. 9 Urban ✔ 9 Industrial ✔ 9 Commercial 9 Residential (suburban) 9 Rural (non-farm) 9 Forest 9 Agriculture 9 Aquatic 9 Other (specify): ____________________________________ ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres +/-) • Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious 109 109 surfaces • Forested 0 0 0 • Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- 0 0 0 agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) • Agricultural 0 0 0 (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features 0 0 0 (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) • Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) 0 0 0 • Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) 0 0 • Other Describe: _______________________________ 0 0 0 ________________________________________ Page 9 of 13 Page 269 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No i. If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed 9 Yes 9 No ✔ day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Upstate Bone & Joint Center ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: _________________________________ feet • Dam length: _________________________________ feet • Surface area: _________________________________ acres • Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? 9 Yes 9 No • If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin 9 Yes ✔ 9 No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any 9 Yes ✔ 9 No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site 9 Yes 9 No Remediation database? Check all that apply: 9 Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? 9 Yes 9 No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10 of 13 Page 270 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No • If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ • Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ • Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ • Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? 9 Yes 9 No • Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ >20 ft feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________ Ontario Loam __________% 49 ___________________________ cut / fill land __________% 51 ____________________________ __________% d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ >10 ft feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: ✔ 9 Well Drained: _____% 100 of ite 9 Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site 9 Poorly Drained _____% of ite f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ✔ 9 0-10%: _____% 100 of site 9 10-15%: _____% of site 9 15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No state or local agency? iv. For each identified r lat wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information • Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ t Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________ Approximate Size ___________________ Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired 9 Yes 9 ✔ No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No j. Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No k. Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: Principal Aquifer _________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 13 Page 271 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ ______________________________ squirrels / birds _______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: ______________________ acres • Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres • Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ✔9 Yes 9 No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? i. p ci an li tin n an r or t r at n Indiana Bat p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of 9 Yes ✔ 9 No special concern? i. p ci an li tin q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: 9 Biological Community 9 Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 13 Page 272 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district 9 Yes ✔ 9 No which is listed on t ational or tat i t r of Historic Plac or t at a n t r in t o i ion r o t ic o ar cr ation an i toric r r ation to li i l or li tin on t tat i t r of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: 9 Archaeological Site 9 Historic Building or District ii. Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for 9 Yes ✔ 9 No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h. the project site it in i il o any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local 9 Yes ✔9 No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Distance between project and resource: _____________________ miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? 9 Yes 9 No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. 10/4/2021 Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Robert Daino Date_______________________________________ Authorized Signatory Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________ PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 Page 273 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 EAF Mapper Summary Report Wednesday, September 22, 2021 10:29 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Potential Contamination History] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Listed] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook. E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation No Site] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] No E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] No E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] No E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] No E.2.i. [Floodway] No E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] No E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] No E.2.l. [Aquifers] Yes E.2.l. [Aquifer Names] Principal Aquifer E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] Yes Full Environmental Page 274 Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 E.2.o.Envelope DocuSign [Endangered or Threatened Species - Indiana Bat ID: 05665509-A7E0-4D3C-9513-E10EE921E221 Name] E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Places or State Eligible Sites] Workbook. E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No Full Environmental Page 275 Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 Page 276 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Project Summary Draft 10/1/2021 1. Project RPNY Solar 5, LLC 2. Project Number 0 3. Location Manlius 4. School District East Syracuse-Minoa School District 6. Project Type New Construction/Solar 5. Tax Parcel(s) 055.-01-10.1 0 7.Total Project Cost $ 2,418,575 8. Total Jobs 0 Land $ 145,475 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ 85,000 8B: Job Creation 0 Building $ - (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ 1,515,543 Equipment Subject to NYS Production $ 147,130 Exemption Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 61,533 Financial Charges $ 50,000 Legal Fees $ 15,000 Other- Solar Installation Labor $ 398,895 Cost Benefit Analysis RPNY Solar 5, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Abatement Cost $ 224,192 Sales Tax $ 55,340 Mortgage Tax $ 12,200 Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $ 156,652 New Investment $ 2,979,452 PILOT Payments $ 94,345 Project Wages (10 years) $ - Construction Wages $ 435,300 RPNY Solar 5, LLC is proposing a 1.6 MW Solar energy system farm located on 6.95 acres in the Town of Manlius. Employee Benefits (10 years) $ - Project Capital Investment $ 2,418,575 New Sales Tax Generated $ - Agency Fees $ 31,232 Agency Legal Fees $ 6,046 Benefit:Cost Ratio 13 :1 Page 277 RPNY Solar 5, LLC LLC- Draft 10/1/2021 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet Current Revenue Generated by Parcel $ 1,909 Expected Revenue from the Parcel if no project occurred $ 61,158.33 Projected Year 1 Revenue to be generated as a result of the project: $6,400 Total Project Cost $ 2,418,574.99 OCIDA Estimate of Project Value $ 378,885.65 Projected MW to be generated 1.6 Scheduled PILOT Payments $ 155,503 East Syracuse-Minoa Full Tax Payment without Year Onondaga County Manlius Total PILOT Net Exemption School District PILOT 15% 14% 72% 100.0% 2019-2020 290.36 211.85 1,407.18 $ 1,909 1 $ 937 $ 872 $ 4,592 $ 6,400 $ 11,744 $ 5,344 2 $ 955 $ 889 $ 4,683 $ 6,528 $ 11,979 $ 5,451 3 $ 974 $ 907 $ 4,777 $ 6,659 $ 12,218 $ 5,560 4 $ 994 $ 925 $ 4,873 $ 6,792 $ 12,463 $ 5,671 5 $ 1,014 $ 944 $ 4,970 $ 6,928 $ 12,712 $ 5,784 6 $ 1,034 $ 963 $ 5,069 $ 7,066 $ 12,966 $ 5,900 7 $ 1,055 $ 982 $ 5,171 $ 7,207 $ 13,225 $ 6,018 8 $ 1,076 $ 1,001 $ 5,274 $ 7,352 $ 13,490 $ 6,138 9 $ 1,097 $ 1,022 $ 5,380 $ 7,499 $ 13,760 $ 6,261 10 $ 1,119 $ 1,042 $ 5,487 $ 7,649 $ 14,035 $ 6,386 11 $ 1,142 $ 1,063 $ 5,597 $ 7,802 $ 14,316 $ 6,514 12 $ 1,164 $ 1,084 $ 5,709 $ 7,958 $ 14,602 $ 6,644 13 $ 1,188 $ 1,106 $ 5,823 $ 8,117 $ 14,894 $ 6,777 14 $ 1,212 $ 1,128 $ 5,940 $ 8,279 $ 15,192 $ 6,913 15 $ 1,236 $ 1,150 $ 6,059 $ 8,445 $ 15,496 $ 7,051 16 $ 1,260 $ 1,173 $ 6,180 $ 8,614 $ 20,958 $ 12,344 17 $ 1,286 $ 1,197 $ 6,303 $ 8,786 $ 21,377 $ 12,591 18 $ 1,311 $ 1,221 $ 6,429 $ 8,962 $ 21,805 $ 12,843 19 $ 1,338 $ 1,245 $ 6,558 $ 9,141 $ 22,241 $ 13,100 20 $ 1,364 $ 1,270 $ 6,689 $ 9,324 $ 22,685 $ 13,362 TOTAL $ 22,756 $ 21,184 $ 111,564 $ 155,503 $ 312,155 $ 156,652 Page 278 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPLICATION FOR BENEFITS 1. Fill in all blanks using “none”, “not applicable” or “not available”. If you have any questions about the way to respond, please call the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency at 315-435-3770. 2. If providing an estimate put “(est.)” after the figure or answer. If more space is needed to answer any specific question, attach a separate sheet. 3. If the OCIDA Board approves benefits, it is the company’s responsibility to obtain and submit all necessary forms and documents. (ST-60, PILOT Agreement) 4. When completed, return this Application by mail or fax to the Agency at the address indicated below. A signed application may also be submitted electronically in PDF format to Nate Stevens at nstevens@ongov.net. An Application will not be considered by the Agency until the Application fee has been received. 5. The Agency will not give final approval for this Application until the Agency receives a completed NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form concerning the Project, which is the subject of this Application. The form is available at http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html. 6. Please note the Public Officers Law declares all records in the possession of the OCIDA (with certain limited exceptions) are open to public inspection and copying. If the Applicant is of the opinion that there are elements of the Project which are in the nature of trade secrets which, if disclosed to the public or otherwise widely disseminated, would cause substantial injury to the Applicant’s competitive position, this Applicant must identify such elements in writing and request that such elements be kept confidential. In accordance with Article 6 of the Public Officer’s Law, the OCIDA may also redact personal, private, and/or proprietary information from publicly disseminated documents. 7. The Applicant will be required to pay the Agency Application fee and, if accepted as a project of the agency, all administrative and legal fees as stated in Section VI of the Application. 8. A complete application consists of the following 9 items:  This Application  Local Access Agreement  Employment Plan  Conflict of Interest  A feasibility statement indicating the need for the requested benefits  Description of project, Site Plans/Sketches, and Maps  NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form  A check payable to the Agency in the amount of $1,000  A check payable to Barclay Damon LLP in the amount of $2,500 9. This Application was adopted by the OCIDA Board on November 19, 2019. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 1 Page 279 It is the policy of the Agency that any project receiving benefits from the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency will utilize 100% local contractors and local labor for the construction period of the project unless a waiver is granted in writing by the Agency. Return to: Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Attn: Nate Stevens 333 W. Washington Street, Suite 130 Syracuse, NY 13202 Phone: 315-435-3770 | Fax: 315-435-3669 nstevens@ongov.net Section I: Applicant Information Please answer all questions. Use “None”, “Not Applicable” and “See Attached” where necessary. A) Applicant information-company receiving benefits: Applicant Name: RPNY Solar 5, LLC Applicant Address: 879 Sanchez Street Phone: (415) 710-3834 Fax: renewprop.com Website: E-mail: stephanie@renewprop.com Federal ID#: 85-4254771 NAICS: State and Year of Incorporation/Organization: __________________________________________ New York / 2020 Will a Real Estate Holding Company be utilized to own the Project property/ facility? ☐Yes ☐No What is the name of the Real Estate Holding Company: Federal ID#: State and Year of Incorporation/Organization: List of stockholders, members, or partners of Real Estate Holding Company: ________________________________________________________________________________ B) Individual Completing Application: Name: Ben Vollmer Title: Project Developer Address: 879 Sanchez Street, San Francisco, CA 94114 Phone: (828) 719-0461 Fax: E-mail: ben@renewprop.com Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 2 Page 280 C) Company Contact (if different from individual completing application): Name: Stephanie Loucas Title: Vice President, Development Address: 879 Sanchez Street San Francisco, CA 94114 Phone: 415-710-3834 Cell Phone: 415-710-3834 E-mail: stephanie@renewprop.com D) Company Counsel: Name of Attorney: Rob Panasci Firm Name: Young/Sommer LLC Address: Executive Woods, Five Palisades Drive, Albany, NY 12205 Phone: (585) 438-9907 ext. 251 Cell Phone: (518) 207-5448 E-mail: rpanasci@youngsommer.com E) Business Organization (check appropriate category): ☐ Corporation ☐Partnership ☐ Public Corporation ☐Joint Venture ☐ Sole Proprietorship ☐Limited Liability Company Others (please specify): Year Established: 2020 State in which Organization is established: New York F) List all stockholders, members, or partners with % of ownership greater than 5% : Name % of ownership Wildcat Renewables, LLC 100% Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 3 Page 281 G) Applicant Business Description: Please attach a description of your company’s background, products, customers, goods and services. Estimated % of sales within Onondaga County: _______________________________________ 50 Estimated % of sales outside Onondaga County but within New York State: 50 Estimated % of sales outside New York State but within the U.S.: 0 Estimated % of sales outside the U.S.: 0 (*Percentage to equal 100%) H) What percentage of your total annual supplies, raw materials and vendor services are purchased from firms in Onondaga County. Include list of vendors, raw material suppliers and percentages for each. Provide supporting documentation including estimated percentages of local purchases. Please attach this information. We will endeavor to source as much material as possible from firms in Onondaga County. However, we are unable to commit to exact percentages at this time. I) Applicant History: If the answer to any of the following is “Yes”, please explain below. If necessary, attach additional information. 1. Is the company or management of the Company now a ☐Yes ☐No plaintiff or defendant in any civil or criminal litigation? 2. Has any person listed above ever been convicted of a criminal offense (other than a minor traffic violation)? ☐Yes ☐No 3. Has any person listed in Section I ever been in receivership or declared bankruptcy? ☐Yes ☐No Please attach any explanations: J) Has the Project Beneficiary received assistance from OCIDA, SIDA, New York State or the Onondaga Civic Development Corporation in the past? If yes please attach an explanation and please give year, project name, description of benefits and address of project. ☐Yes ☐No Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 4 Page 282 Section II: Project Information A) Project Location: Location where the investment will take place. If company is moving, the new location should be entered here and the current location should be in Section I. Address: 7390 Kirkville Road Legal Address (if different): City: East Syracuse Village/Town: Manlius Zip Code: 13057 School District: East Syracuse - Minoa Tax Map Parcel ID(s): 313889055.-01-10.1 Current Assessed Value: $56,600 Sq. Footage of Existing Building: N/A Census Tract: 154 B) Type (Check all that apply): ☐New construction ☐Purchase of machinery and/or equipment ☐Expansion/Addition to current facilities ☐Brownfield/Remediated Brownfield ☐Renovation of existing facility ☐LEED Certification ☐Acquisition of existing facility/property ☐Other: ☐Demolition and Construction C) Please attach a summary of how this project will help your business grow. Will it set the company up for revenue growth? Will it mitigate cost? Will it provide more flexibility? D) Description of Project: Please provide a detailed narrative of the proposed Project. This narrative should include, but is not limited to: ☐ (i) the size of the Project in square feet and a breakdown of square footage per each intended use; ☐ (ii) the size of the lot upon which the Project sits or is to be constructed; ☐ (iii) the current use of the site and the intended use of the site upon completion of the Project; ☐ (iv) the principal products to be produced and/or the principal activities that will occur on the Project site; and ☐ (v) an indication as to why the Applicant is undertaking the Project and the need for the requested benefits. Please separately attach the description and any copies of site plans, sketches or maps. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 5 Page 283 E) Select Project Type for all end users at Project site (you may check more than one): **Please check any and all end users as identified below ☐ Industrial ☐Bank Office ☐ Acquisition of Existing Facility ☐Retail ☐ Housing ☐Mixed Use ☐ Equipment Purchase ☐Facility for Aging ☐ Multi-Tenant ☐Civic Facility (not for profit) ☐ Commercial ☐Other solar farm F) For the Agency to consider this Project, please provide the following information: 1. Does the project consist of new construction or expansion or substantial renovation of an existing facility? ☐Yes ☐No 2. Will the project create new employment opportunities or retain existing jobs that may otherwise be lost? ☐Yes ☐No 3. Does the project beneficiary serve a customer base primarily outside of Onondaga County? ☐Yes ☐No G) Will the completion of the Project result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the company from one area of the state to another area of the state OR in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the company located within the state? Please explain if you answer “Yes” by attaching a response. ☐Yes ☐No H) Please attach a description of any compelling circumstances the Agency should be aware of while reviewing this application. I) Environmental Information 1. Please attach the appropriate Environmental Impact Forms to your application. Here is a link to the SEQR forms: a. http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html 2. Have any environmental issues been identified on the property? ☐Yes ☐No If yes, please attach an explanation. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 6 Page 284 Section III: Construction A) Project Costs and Finances Description of Costs Total % of Total Total Private Expenditure Budget Budget to be (should be less than or Amount Procured in equal to total budget Onondaga amount) County Land Acquisition $145,474.56 100 % Site Work/Demo $85,000 0% (est.) Building Construction & Renovation 0% (est.) 0% (est.) Furniture & Fixtures None None Equipment $1,515,542.60 0% (est.) Equipment Subject to NYS Production Sales Tax $147,130 0% (est.) Engineering/Architect Exemption $61,532.63 0% (est.) sFinancial Charges $50,000 0% (est.) Legal $15,000 25% (est.) Other Labor $398,895.20 0% (est.) Management/Developer Fees Total Project Cost $2,418,574.99 Note: Do not include OCIDA fees, OCIDA application fees or OCIDA legal fees as part of the Total Project Cost. You may attach a separate chart if needed. B) TOTAL Capital Costs $ 2,418,574.99 Project refinancing: estimated amount (for refinancing of existing debt only) $ Sources of Funds for Project Costs: 1. Bank Financing $ _______________ 1,626,656.25 2. Equity (excluding equity that is attributed to grants/tax credits) $ 542,218.75 3. Tax Exempt Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ _______________ 4. Taxable Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 7 Page 285 5. Public Sources (Include sum total of all state and federal grants and tax credits) $ 249,700.00 -Identify each state and federal grant/credit: MW Block Incentive $ 249,700.00 $ $ 6. Total Sources of Funds for Project Costs $ _______________ 2,418,574.99 C) Employment and Payroll Information *Full Time Equivalent (FTE) is defined as one employee working no less than 40 hours per week or two or more employees together working a total of 40 hours per week. 1. Are there people currently employed at the project site? ☐Yes ☐No If yes, provide number of FTE jobs at the facility: 2. Complete the following: Estimate the number of FTE jobs to be retained as a result of this Project: 0 Estimate the number of construction jobs to be created by this Project: 30 (est.) Estimate the average length of construction jobs to be created (months): 4 months Current annual payroll at facility: N/A Average annual growth rate of wages: N/A Please list, if any, benefits that will be available to either full and/or part time employees: N/A Average annual benefit paid by the company ($ or % salary) per FTE job: N/A Average growth rate of benefit cost: N/A Amount or percent of wage employees pay for benefits: N/A Provide an estimate of the number of residents in the Economic Development Region (Onondaga, Madison, Cayuga, Oneida, Oswego, and Cortland Counties) to fill new FTE jobs: N/A Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 8 Page 286 D) New Employment Benefits i. Complete the following chart indicating the number of FTE jobs presently employed at the Project and the number of FTE jobs that will be created at the Project site at the end of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth years after the Project is completed. Jobs should be listed by title of category (see below), including FTE independent contractors or employees of independent contractors that work at the Project location. Do not include construction workers. ii. Feel free to include additional information or a substitute chart if you think additional material would add clarity. Current & Planned Full Salary Current Estimated Number of FTE Jobs Time Occupations (Job (Annual or Number of added each year after project Titles) Hourly) FTEs Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 completion Job Creation Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 For purposes of completing the chart, please list the job titles that will be increasing in number. If possible, please attach a brief description that outlines what each job entails. If you prefer, you may attach a job chart of your own that outlines the job growth projections regarding the project. E) Financial Assistance sought (estimated values): ☐ Real Property Tax Abatement (PILOT): Seeking PILOT of $4,000/MW for 20 years ☐ Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption (.75% of amount mortgaged): $12,199.92 ☐ Sales and Use Tax Exemption (4% Local, 4% State): $55,340.34 ☐ Tax Exempt Bond Financing (Amount Requested): ☐ Taxable Bond Financing (Amount Requested): Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 9 Page 287 F) Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption Benefit Calculator: Amount of mortgage that would be subject to mortgage recording tax: Mortgage Amount (include sum total of construction/permanent/ bridge financing): $ 1,626,656.25 Estimated Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption Benefit (product of mortgage amount as indicated above, multiplied by .0075): $ 12,199.92 G) Sales and Use Tax Benefit Calculator: Gross amount of costs for goods and services that are subject to State and local Sales and US tax – said amount to benefit from the Agency’s Sales and Use Tax exemption benefit: $ 691,754.20 Estimated State and local Sales and Use Tax Benefit (product of 8% multiplied by the figure, above) (This should match the amount in section “E” on this page, this calculation only exists to help you with your estimate): $ 55,340.34 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 10 Page 288 Section IV: Estimate of Real Property Tax Abatement Benefits Section IV of this Application will be: (i) completed by IDA Staff based upon information contained within the Application, and (ii) provided to the Applicant for ultimate inclusion as part of this completed Application prior to the completed application being provided to the OCIDA Board. A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet OCIDA estimate of current value New construction and renovation costs OCIDA estimate of increase in value OCIDA estimated value of completed project OCIDA estimate of taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur Scheduled PILOT payments PILOT Exemption County Local School Total Full Tax Net Exemption Year % PILOT PILOT PILOT PILOT Payment Amount Amount Amount w/o PILOT 1 100 2 90 3 80 4 70 5 60 6 50 7 40 8 30 9 20 10 10 TOTAL Estimates provided are based on current property tax rates and assessment value (current as of date of application submission) and have been calculated by IDA staff Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 11 Page 289 Section V: Local Access Policy Agreement In absence of a waiver permitting otherwise, every project seeking the assistance of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (Agency) must use local general contractors, sub- contractors, and labor for one-hundred percent (100%) of the construction of new, expanded, or renovated facilities. The project’s construction or project manager need not be a local company. Noncompliance may result in the revocation and/or recapture of all benefits extended to the project by the Agency. Local Labor is defined as laborers permanently residing in the State of New York counties of Cayuga, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, Tompkins, and Wayne. Local (General/Sub) Contractor is defined as a contractor operating a permanent office in the State of New York counties of Cayuga, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, Tompkins and Wayne. The Agency may determine on a case-by-case basis to waive the Local Access Policy for a project or for a portion of a project where consideration of warranty issues, necessity of specialized skills, significant cost differentials between local and non-local services or other compelling circumstances exist. The procedure to address a local labor waiver can be found in the OCIDA handbook, which is available upon request. RPNY Solar 5 will endeavor to source the highest possible percentage of labor from the local area. However, in the event the requisite amount of qualified labor with the necessary skillset is unavailable locally, outside laborers will need to be contracted. Prior to issuance of any NYS Tax & Finance ST-60 forms, the Applicant must submit a Contractor Status Report to the Agency. In consideration of the extension of financial assistance by the Agency RPNY Solar 5, LLC (the Company) understands the Local Access Policy and agrees to complete Appendix C of the Agency’s application at the time of the application to the Agency and as part of a request to extend the valid date of the Agency’s tax-exempt certificate for the Project. The Company understands that an Agency tax-exempt certificate is typically valid for 12 months from the effective date of the project inducement and extended thereafter upon request by the Company. The Company further understands that any request for a waiver to this policy must be submitted in writing and approved by the Agency. I agree to the conditions of this agreement and certify all information provided regarding the construction and employment activities for the project as of 8/02/21 (date). Company: RPNY Solar 5, LLC Representative for Contract: Ben Vollmer __ Address: 879 Sanchez Street City: San Francisco State: CA Zip: 94114 Phone: (828) 719-0461 Email: ben@renewprop.com Project Address: 7390 Kirkville Road City: East Syracuse State: NY Zip: 13057 General Contractor: Contact Person: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Email: Authorized Representative: Title: Signature: Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 12 Page 290 Section VI: Agency Fee Schedule Payment Terms: Application & Processing Fee (payable at the time of application): $1,000 Legal Deposit (payable at the time of application): $2,500 Agency Fee for Bond Projects: Payable at Closing Agency and Legal Fees for all other projects: Due and Payable at Inducement * A sales tax certificate (ST-60) will not be issued until the Agency Fee is Paid in Full Agency Fees: The project cost is the Total Project Cost from section III A Benefit Sought Fee Charged Mortgage Recording Tax and/or Sales Tax exemptions: 0.01 X the project cost Additional Fee for PILOT Agreement Projects: 0.0025 X the project cost Fee for bond financing, refinancing & refunding: 0.0025 X the project cost Note: For Manufacturing Projects under $10 million the fee is reduced by: 0.0025 X the project cost Agency Legal Fees: The project cost is the Total Project Cost from section III A Fee for first $20 million: 0.0025 of the project cost Fee for expenses above $20 million: 0.00125 of the project cost In addition to the foregoing, Applicants are responsible for payment of all costs and expenses incurred by OCIDA in connection with application or Project including without limitation publication, copying costs, SEQRA compliance and fees and costs to OCIDA’s attorneys, engineers, and consultants. OCIDA reserves the right to require a deposit to cover anticipated costs. Application fees are payable at time application/request is submitted. All fees are non-refundable. Applicants for bond transactions are responsible for payment of a Bond Issuance Charge payable to the State of New York. Applicants are also responsible for payment of post-closing fees and costs associated with the appointment of additional agents. OCIDA reserves the right to modify this schedule at any time and assess fees and charges in connection with other transactions such as grants of easement or lease or sale of OCIDA-owned property. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 13 Page 291 Section VII: Recapture of Tax Abatement/Exemptions Information to be Provided by Companies: Each Company agrees that to receive benefits from the Agency it must, whenever requested by the Agency or required under applicable statutes or project documents, provide and certify or cause to be provided and certified such information concerning the Company, its finances, its employees and other topics which shall, from time to time, be necessary or appropriate, including but not limited to, such information as to enable the Agency to make any reports required by law or governmental regulation. Recapture of Benefits: It is the policy of the Agency to recapture the value of a PILOT, any sales and use tax exemption, and mortgage recording tax exemption in accordance with the Laws of the State and the provisions contained herein. Before receiving benefits, the Company must attest in writing to its understanding of, and agreement to, the recapture provisions contained in State Law and herein. To the extent permitted by State law, the recapture provisions contained herein may be modified from time to time by the Agency at its sole discretion. Recapture of a PILOT, Sales Tax and the Mortgage Recording Tax Exemptions: If the number of full time equivalent jobs to be maintained or created in connection with a project falls below 75% of the number projected in the Company’s application to the Agency, or if there are material violations of the project agreements, then the value of the property tax, sales and use tax and mortgage recording tax benefits extended to the project by the Agency may be subject to recapture. When deciding whether or not to recapture benefits and the amount of such recapture, the Agency may consider the potential future benefit of the business to the community. Recapture Payment: The recapture payment paid by the Company to the Agency shall be determined (1) by the difference between any PILOT payments made by the Company and the property taxes that would have been paid by the Company if the property were not under the supervision, jurisdiction or control of the Agency, (2) the value of any mortgage recording tax exemption, if awarded to the Company and (3) the amount of sales and use tax that would have been paid if an exemption was not granted. Recapture of the PILOT, Sales Tax or Mortgage Recording Tax: The Recapture Schedule for a Payment in Lieu of Tax Agreement, Sales Tax or the Mortgage Recording Tax is as follows: Time from Project Completion Tax Savings Recaptured 1 Year 80% 2 Years 60% 3 Years 40% 4 Years 20% 5 Years 10% Distribution of the Recapture Payment: Any funds recaptured as a result of the recapture payment shall be distributed to the affected taxing jurisdictions in the same proportion as if the payments were paid or owed by the Company on the date of recapture. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 14 Page 292 Additional Conditions for the Recapture of Sales and Use Tax: As of April 1, 2013, New York State law requires Industrial Development Agencies to recapture sales tax benefits where:  A project is not entitled to receive the benefits:  Exemptions received exceed the amount authorized by the Agency;  Exemptions are claimed by the Project for unauthorized property or services; or  A project fails to use property in the manner required by its IDA agreements. 1. Distribution of Sales and Use Tax. Project operators must cooperate with the Agency in its effort to recapture all sales and use tax benefits received by the Company by promptly paying the recapture amount as determined by the Agency. The amount to be recaptured will be dictated by State Law or this UTEP Policy, which ever may be applicable. The Agency shall remit the recaptured sales and use tax benefits to the State within 30 days of receipt. 2. Compliance Report. Annually, the Agency will file an annual compliance report with the State of New York detailing its recapture terms and its activities to recapture benefits, including any attempt to recapture benefits from an Agency project. A “Full Time Permanent Employee” shall mean 1. A full time, permanent, private sector employee on the Company’s payroll, who has worked at the project location for a minimum of thirty hours per week for not less than four consecutive weeks and who is entitled to receive the usual and customary fringe benefits extended by Company to other employees with comparable rank, duties and hours; or 2. Up to three part time, permanent, private-sector employees on Company’s payroll, who have worked at the project location for a combined minimum of thirty hours per week for not less than four consecutive weeks and who are entitled to receive the usual and customary fringe benefits extended by Company to other employees with comparable rank, duties and hours. I have read the foregoing and agree to comply with all the terms and conditions contained therein as well as policies of the Onondaga County Industrial Agency. Name of Applicant Company _________________________________ RPNY Solar 5, LLC Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Aaron Halimi, President Date: ______________ Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 15 Page 293 Section VIII: Employment Plan Jobs Listings: In accordance with §858-b(2) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any Financial Assistance from the Agency, except as otherwise provided by collective bargaining agreements, new employment opportunities created as a result of the Project will be listed with the New York State Department of Labor Business Services and with the administrative entity of the service delivery area created by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014 in which the Project is located. In Onondaga County, please contact CNY Works. Additionally, the applicant is encouraged to review the services provided by JOBSPlus! for candidate matching services. Are the employees of your company currently covered by a collective bargaining agreement? ☐Yes ☐No If yes, name and location: Is the labor pool in Onondaga County and/or the CNY Economic Development Region adequate to fill new positions? ☐Yes ☐No Enter Company Name in three (3) places below and sign by an authorized company officer: In consideration of the benefits provided by the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (OCIDA), RPNY Solar 5, LLC , project beneficiary, also agrees to report to OCIDA on the number of new employment opportunities created in connection with industrial or commercial projects financed by the proceeds of such benefits to be listed with the New York State Department of Labor Business Services and CNY Works. RPNY Solar 5, LLC , project beneficiary, also agrees to report to OCIDA on or before March 1 of each year the status of employment opportunities filed with the New York State Department of Labor Business Services, including the number of new employment opportunities created, the number listed, and the number filled for the year ending the prior December 31. RPNY Solar 5, LLC , project beneficiary, further agrees that, to the extent practicable and feasible, and subject to the requirements of any existing collective bargaining agreement, the project beneficiary shall fill at least 10% of new employment opportunities with persons eligible for service under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014. Name of Applicant Company: ______________________________________________________ RPNY Solar 5, LLC Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: ______________________________________ Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: ___________________________________ Aaron Halimi, President Date: ______________ Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 16 Page 294 NYS Department of Labor: Roy Jewell Associate Business Service Representative 450 South Salina Street, Syracuse, NY 13202 315-479-3362 roy.jewell@labor.ny.gov www.labor.ny.gov CNY Works Chris Kennedy Business Development Specialist 960 James Street, Syracuse, NY 13203 315-477-6974 ckennedy@cnyworks.com www.cnyworks.com Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 17 Page 295 Section IX: Conflict of Interest Agency Board Members 1. Patrick Hogan 2. Steve Morgan 3. Victor Ianno 4. Sue Stanczyk 5. Kevin Ryan 6. Janice Herzog 7. Fanny Villarreal Agency Officers/Staff 1. Robert M. Petrovich 2. Nathaniel Stevens 3. Nancy Lowery 4. Karen Doster 5. Chris Cox Agency Legal Counsel & Auditor 1. Jeffrey Davis, Esq., Barclay Damon LLP 2. Amanda Mirabito, Esq., Barclay Damon LLP 3. Michael G. Lisson, CPA, Grossman St. Amour Certified Public Accountants PLLC The Applicant has received from the Agency a list of members, officers and staff of the Agency. To the best of my knowledge, no member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect, in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described: Name of Applicant Company _________________________________ RPNY Solar 5, LLC Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Aaron Halimi, President Date: ______________ Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 18 Page 296 Section X: Representations, Certifications, and Indemnification Aaron Halimi (Name of CEO or other authorized representative of Applicant) confirms and says that he/she is the ____________________ President (title) of ____________________ RPNY Solar 5, LLC (name of corporation or other entity) named in the attached Application (the “Applicant”), that he/she has read the foregoing Application and knows the contents thereof, and hereby represents, understands, and otherwise agrees with the Agency and as follows: A. First Consideration for Employment: In accordance with §858-b (2) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any Financial Assistance from the Agency, except as otherwise provided by collective bargaining agreements, where practicable, the Applicant will first consider persons eligible to participate in WIA programs who shall be referred by the CNY Works for new employment opportunities created as a result of the Project. B. Other NYS Facilities: In accordance with §862 (1) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that projects which will result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant within the state is ineligible for Agency Financial Assistance, unless otherwise approved by the Agency as reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project in its respective industry or is reasonably necessary. C. Annual Sales Tax Filings: In accordance with §874(8) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any sales tax exemptions as part of the Financial Assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file, or cause to be filed, with the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, the annual form prescribed by the Department of Taxation and Finance, describing the value of all sales tax exemptions claimed by the Applicant and all consultants or subcontractors retained by the Applicant. D. Outstanding Bonds: The Applicant understands and agrees to provide on an annual basis any information regarding bonds, if any, issued by the Agency for the project that is requested by the Comptroller of the State of New York. E. Employment Reports: The Applicant understands and agrees that, if the Project receives any financial assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file with the Agency, at least annually or as otherwise required by the Agency, reports regarding the number of people employed at the project site, salary levels, contractor utilization and such other information (collectively, “Employment Reports”) that may be required from time to time on such appropriate forms as designated by the Agency. Failure to provide Employment Reports within 30 days of an Agency request shall be an Event of Default under the PILOT Agreement between the Agency and Applicant and, if applicable, an Event of Default under the Agent Agreement between the Agency and Applicant. In addition, a Notice of Failure to provide the Agency with an Employment Report may be reported to Agency board members, with said report being an agenda item subject to the open Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 19 Page 297 meetings law. F. Absence of Conflicts of Interest: The Applicant has received from the Agency a list of the members, officers and employees of the Agency. No member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described in Section X. G. Compliance: The Applicant understands and agrees that it is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection, and environmental laws, rules, and regulations. H. The Applicant understands and agrees that the provisions of Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law, as provided below, will not be violated if financial assistance is provided for the proposed Project: § 862. Restrictions on funds of the Agency. (1) No funds of the Agency shall be used in respect of any project if the completion thereof would result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant located within the state, provided, however, that neither restriction shall apply if the agency shall determine on the basis of the application before it that the project is reasonably necessary to discourage the project occupant from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the state or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project occupant in its respective industry. I. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the owner, occupant or operator receiving financial assistance for the proposed Project is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection and environmental laws, rules and regulations. J. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the submission of any knowingly false or knowingly misleading information may lead to the immediate termination of any financial assistance and the reimbursement of an amount equal to all or part of any tax exemption claimed by reason of the Agency’s involvement in the Project. K. The Applicant confirms and hereby acknowledges that as of the date of this Application, the Applicant is in substantial compliance with all provisions of Article 18-A of the New York General Municipal Law, including, but not limited to, the provision of Section 859- a and Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law. L. The Applicant and the individual executing this Application on behalf of Applicant acknowledge that the Agency and its counsel will rely on the representations and covenants made in this Application when acting hereon and hereby represents that the statements made herein do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact and do not omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement contained herein not misleading. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 20 Page 298 M. The OCIDA has the right to request and inspect supporting documentation regarding attestations made on this application. N. Hold Harmless Agreement: Applicant hereby releases Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency and the members, officers, servants, agents and employees thereof (the "Agency") from, agrees that the Agency shall not be liable for, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Agency harmless from and against any and all liability arising from or expense incurred by: (A) the Agency's examination and processing of, and action pursuant to or upon, the attached Application, regardless of whether or not the Application or the Project described therein or the tax-exemptions and other assistance requested therein are favorably acted upon by the Agency; (B) the Agency's acquisition, construction, and/or installation of the Project described therein and (C) any further action taken by the Agency with respect to the Project, including without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all cause of action and attorney's fees and any other expenses incurred in defending any suits or action which may arise as a result of any of the foregoing. If, for any reason, the Applicant fails to conclude or consummate necessary negotiations, or fails, within a reasonable or specified period of time, to take reasonable, proper or requested action, or withdraws, abandons, cancels or neglects the Application, or if the Agency or the Applicant are unable to reach final agreement with respect to the Project, then, and in the event, upon presentation of an invoice itemizing the same, the Applicant shall pay to the Agency, its agents or assigns, all costs incurred by the Agency in the process of the Application, including attorney's fees, if any. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 21 Page 299 Name of Applicant Company _______________________________________ RPNY Solar 5, LLC Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Aaron Halimi, President Date: ______________ STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF ONONDAGA )ss.; , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. That I am the (Corporate Officer) of (Applicant) and that I am duly authorized on behalf of the Applicant to bind the Applicant. 2. That I have read and attached Application, I Know the contents thereof, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, this Application and the contents of this Application are true, accurate and complete (Signature of Officer) Subscribed and affirmed to me under penalties of perjury this day of , 20 . (Notary Public) End of Application Rev 1-9-20 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 22 Page 300 Renewable Properties, LLC 879 Sanchez Street San Francisco, CA 94114 www.renewprop.com July 30, 2021 Mr. Robert Petrovich Executive Director Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency 333 W. Washington Street, Suite 130 Syracuse, NY 13202 Dear Mr. Petrovich, RE: Kirkville Road Solar Project Narrative The Kirkville Road Solar Project (Project) is small-scale commercial solar energy generating facility that will be located on approximately 7 acres of a 27-acre parcel. The subject parcel is located at 7390 Kirkville Road (APN 313889055.-01-10.1) in the Town of Manlius, NY, and is currently vacant. The parcel is zoned “Restricted Agriculture.” The Project received Site Plan and Special Use Permit approval at the March 8, 2021 Manlius Town Planning Board meeting. The Project will provide electric utility cost savings for Onondaga County residents and businesses. In addition, the Project will generate approximately $155,000 dollars in PILOT payments over 20 years. During the construction period, the Project will create up to 30 full-time construction related jobs, which may be filled by locally based workers depending upon availability and expertise. After construction, the Project will bring long-term maintenance contracts for local electricians and property maintenance companies. The Project will also result in increased revenues to the county and local municipal tax base, payments to the local hospitality industry, purchase of local supplies and goods, and lease revenues to the participating landowner. It should be noted that tax revenue from community solar systems have a 100% net benefit to the tax base. The Project will not burden municipal resources in any manner and therefore the tax proceeds generated from the existence of the Project have a 100% reduction on municipal expenses. Moreover, the Project will still pay any applicable special district taxes. It is respectfully submitted that almost no other applicant or taxpayer/use can make that representation. For this particular property, tax proceeds will increase by approximately 307% from FY2020 tax receipts. PILOT payments with a 2% contractual escalator will total $6,400/year for base year up to $9,323 in year 20 for a total of $155,503 in payment in lieu of taxes. The Project company has entered into a long-term lease agreement with the property owner, Abdulah Alemic. The Project will generate 1.6 megawatts (MW) of alternating current (AC) emission-free, clean, renewable power. The Project will interconnect to National Grid’s existing electrical distribution system, Page 301 which is located on site. The power generated from this facility will be sold to consumers via the state's Community Distributed Generation program (commonly called community solar). This program allows customers to directly offset their energy use with local solar power while saving money on their electrical bills. According to National Energy Laboratory, only 27% of all homes in the United States can install solar panels. This statistic indicates 73% of the country's population is denied access to renewable energy. Community solar provides utility savings and renewable energy access to businesses and residents that cannot install solar panels on their building because of a lack of financial means, or because of a physical barrier to installation. Community solar lowers the barriers of access to renewable energy, making it attainable for all local residents. The Project will generate an estimated 2,790,000 kWhrs of pollution- free electricity annually, supplying roughly 334 local residences. Additionally, the Project will generate community solar credits for ninety cents on the dollar which will be credited it to residents’ utility invoices. Both residential and commercial customers can take advantage of the savings. The Project will utilize 5,616 modules and 13 string inverters which convert the sun’s energy into usable AC power. Single-access tracking technology will be utilized to allow the modules to efficiently track the sun throughout the day and maximize the efficiency of solar collection. The modules will be mounted on a steel racking system, which will be anchored into the ground using driven steel piers. The overall height of the array will be more no more than 8 feet tall. A full environmental assessment form (FEAF) was completed by the project team and submitted to the Town of Manlius in December of 2020. The Town of Manlius declared their intent to serve as SEQRA lead agency, classified the project as an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA and declared to conduct an uncoordinated SEQRA review of the Unlisted Action at their meeting on February 8, 2021. At their March 8, 2021 meeting, the Town of Manlius Planning Board issued a Negative Declaration of Significant Adverse Impact as SEQRA lead agency for the proposed project (a copy is attached). The Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency as an agency involved in the funding of the proposed Project may proceed to make its own separate determination of significance and decision for the Project as an Unlisted Action receiving uncoordinated review, as supported by the Negative Declaration of Significant Adverse Environmental Impact issued by the Town of Manlius Planning Board. In sum, not only will the Project provide economic benefits to the applicable municipalities pursuant to the annual PILOT payment, it provides savings to the local residents that choose to take advantage of community solar while placing no burden on any municipal resources. RPNY Solar 5 requests this PILOT because our financial modeling indicates the Project would not be feasible otherwise. While past solar projects in Onondaga County may have been able to support a larger PILOT dollar value, near-term sunsetting incentives through NYSERDA, along with the disappearance of the Community Adder, have made the economics on solar projects more challenging. Though projects of Kirkville Road’s size offer outsized community benefits, their relatively small footprint mean less of an ability to take advantage of the economies of scale available to larger projects. For those reasons, a $4,000/MW PILOT is essential to bringing this opportunity and benefits to Onondaga County. Page 302 We are excited to work with the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency and advance this Project through to commercial operation. Sincerely, RENEWABLE PROPERTIES Stephanie Loucas Vice President, Development 415-710-3834 Page 303 TOWN OF MANLIUS SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION (Original or Renewal) DATE: October 7, 2020 Tax Map#_3138890 55.01.10.1____ I -Stephanie Loucas----�-----as applicant relative to property located at -7390 Kirkville Road, East Syracuse, NY 13057---------------- hereby request/apply for issuance/renewal (CIRCLE ONE) of a SPECIAL PERMIT from the Town of Manlius Town Board as required by the Town of Manlius Code, submit the following application and documentary evidence and/or information, including comprising the Exhibits in support of this request and certify that it is correct, true and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge and after reasonable due diligence and investigation. I further knowledge and agree that should any such evidence or information be later determined as false or not credible in any material respect, any special permit issued/renewed based thereon may be determined by the Town Board as void from the start or revocable. Applicant's Signature A 1. Owner(s) of property:Abdulah Alemic-------------- A 2. Status (Owner, Lessee) of each applicant: _Lesee_____________ A 3. Present Zoning of Property: _Restricted Agriculture ____________ A.4.Present Use ofProperty (describe in detail as best as reasonably possible- add additional pages as needed): _Single family residential ________________ A5Describe property condition at present: _Single family home with outbuildings and large undeveloped open space to south of frontage on Kirkville Road BI.Proposed use of property: _Single family residence with addition of a small scale community solar project___________________ B 2. Anticipated number of employees, guests, customers on property: The project will be remotely operated and does not require full time staff for O&M. Regular maintenance items over the life of the system will include washing the dust off the panels at least twice a year and managing vegetation growth. The project will generate electricity during daylight hours B 3. Hours ofProposed Operation: ____________________ 1 dd/2017 Page 304 N/A N/A The Project will not generate any traffic, and once constructed requires very little ongoing maintenance. No lighting proposed. The noise generated by the power conversion devices and transformers is minimal, consisting mostly of low humming and cooling fans. ~ 37dBA when observed from 50 feet away (inside the project area) Quieter than a cycling refrigerator and only noticeable if standing within the solar array The project area is currently a mix of maintained lawn with trees interspersed n/a No signage is proposed. The project will not require public water, sewer, or other resources n/a n/a 50' 50' 50' 50' 50' >1,000' - 8' (from ground surface to max height of panel) Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Kirkville Road Solar Wildcat Renewables , LLC a California based Limited Liability Company located at 879 Sanchez Street, San Francisco, CA 94114 7390 Kirkville Road, East Syracuse, NY 13057 313889 055.01.10.1 October 8 20 2,450.00 Page 308 In addition, and notwithstanding any provisions hereofto the contrary or otherwise, any provisions ofthe Town Code or other laws, rules or regulations providing rights more favorable to and protective ofTown shall be deemed incorporated herein by reference, and shall not be deemed superseded by less protective provisions herein. In the event ofa breach or default by Applicant, Town shall be entitled to pursue any and all legal rights and remedies pursuant to applicable law including, without limitation, the Town Code and shall be entitled to recover, in addition to any sums due, reasonable attorney's fees, costs and disbursements incurred in any such efforts. . If any part of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or entity or circumstance is .adjudged invalid, illegal or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such order or judgment shall be confined in its operation to the part of this law or in its application directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered and shall not affect or impair the validity of the remainder ofthis Agreement or the application thereofto other persons, entities or circumstances. Fmther, in adjudging such invalid, illegal or unconstitutional provision or part thereof, the court shall attempt to modify same to a provision or part which is not illegal, invalid or unconstitutional and which best achieves the intent ofsuch illegal, invalid or unconstitutional provision or pmt thereof. The Town Supervisor has executed this agreement pursuant to a blanket Resolution adopted by the Town Board at a meeting thereofheld on 1 20_, and is duly authorized and empowered to execute this instrument and enter into this Agreement on behalfofthe Town ofManlius. In the event Applicant is a closely held corporation, partnership or limited liability company, its three (3) largest principals shall be signatories to this Agreement, as joint and severable parties with Applicant and Town. This instrument shall be executed in triplicate. At least one original shall be permanently filed, after execution thereof, in the office ofthe Town Clerk and one in the Code Enforcement Office, Dated: 10/8/20_ Wildcat Renewables, LLC Print Applicant Name Applicant's Authorized Signature/Title Applicant Address: 879 Sanchez Street San Francisco, CA 94114 Stephanie Loucas Print Applicant (Principal) Name Applicant's Principal Signature Print Applicant (Principal) Name Applicant's Principal Signature Print Applicant (Principal) Name Applicant's Principal Signature TOWN OF MANLIUS By: _____________ Name: _________ ______ Title: _______________ dd/2017 Page 309 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A. Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: RPNY 5, LLC Kirkville Road Solar Project Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): 7390 Kirkville Road in the Town of Manlius, Onondaga County, New York (43.083927, -76011575) (Please refer to attached USGS Map) Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): The proposed project consists of a 1.6 MW solar energy system solar farm located on an approximately 6.95-acre portion of a 27.65-acre parcel (Parcel ID: 055.-01-10.1). The Project will involve the installation of ground mounted photovoltaic panels as well as associated access road, electric utility upgrades, power inverters and perimeter fencing for the solar energy system. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: 415-710-3834 RPNY Solar 5, LLC c/o Stephanie Loucas (Renewable Properties, LLC) E-Mail: stephanie@renewprop.com Address: 879 Sanchez Street City/PO: San Francisco State: Zip Code: CA 94114 Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: 585-333-3116 Bergmann, c/o Kelly Sullivan E-Mail: khsullivan@bergmannpc.com Address: 280 East Broad Street, Suite 200 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Rochester NY 14604 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: 315-560-4113 Alemic Abdulah E-Mail: N/A Address: 6533 N. Manlius Road City/PO: State: Zip Code: Kirkville NY 13082 Page 1 of 13 Page 310 B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Town , Yes No Town of Manilus Planning Board Application - Site 12/22/2020 or Village Board of Trustees Plan Referral b. City, Town or Village Yes No Town of Manilus Planning Board - Site Plan 12/22/2020- Negative Declaration and Site Planning Board or Commission Approval and Special Use Permit Approval plan approval on 3/8/2021 c. City Town or Yes No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies Yes No e. County agencies Yes No Onondaga County Planning Board and Site Plan and Special Permit approval 1/27/21 Onondaga County IDA f. Regional agencies Yes No g. State agencies Yes No SHPO - No Effect; NYSERDA - Incentives; 12/27/2020 - SHPO No Effect: 10/23/2020 NYSDEC - SPDES GP-020-001 DEC Approval-1/27/2021 h. Federal agencies Yes No USACE - NWP 51 (Non-Reporting) - if nec, USDA USACE - NWP 51 N/A, USDA TBD Rural Energy for America Funding i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? Yes No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? Yes No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? Yes No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the Yes No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site Yes No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action Yes No would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway Yes No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, Yes No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Onondaga County Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 13 Page 311 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. Yes No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Restricted Agricultural (RA) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? Yes No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? Yes No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ East Syracuse - Minoa Central School District b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Manlius Police Department c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Minoa Fire Department and Critical Response Committee emergency services d. What parks serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ellis Field Park and Green Lakes State Park __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Community Solar Farm b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? _____________ 6.95± acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? _____________ 6.95± acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _____________ 27.65± acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? Yes No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? Yes No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? Yes No iii. Number of lots proposed? ________ iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? Yes No If No, anticipated period of construction: _____ months If Yes: Total number of phases anticipated _____ Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 13 Page 312 f. Does the project include new residential uses? Yes No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? Yes No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ N/A ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; N/A ________width; N/A and _______ N/A length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________N/A square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any Yes No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: Ground water Surface water streams Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? Yes No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? Yes No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? Yes No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment Yes No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 Page 313 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? Yes No If Yes: a of vegetation proposed to be removed ___________________________________________________________ acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion ________________________________________ purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? Yes No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? Yes No If Yes: Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________ Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? Yes No Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No Is expansion of the district needed? Yes No Do existing lines serve the project site? Yes No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? Yes No If Yes: Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? Yes No If, Yes: Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? Yes No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? Yes No If Yes: Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? Yes No Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No Is expansion of the district needed? Yes No Page 5 of 13 Page 314 Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? Yes No Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? Yes No If Yes: Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? Yes No If Yes: Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point Yes No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ 0 Square feet or _____0 acres (impervious surface) _____ 1,204 Square feet or _____ 27.65 acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ Limited Use Pervious Gravel Roadway _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On-site surface water ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? Yes No iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? Yes No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel Yes No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, Yes No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet Yes No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: ___________Tons/year ( ) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) ___________Tons/year ( ) of Nitrous Oxide (N2 ) ___________Tons/year ( ) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) ___________Tons/year ( ) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) ___________Tons/year ( ) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflo rocarbons (H ) ___________Tons/year ( ) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 6 of 13 Page 315 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, Yes No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as Yes No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial Yes No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): Morning Evening Weekend Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day Parking spaces: Existing _____________ Proposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________ v. vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? Yes No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric Yes No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing Yes No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand Yes No for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade to an existing substation? Yes No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: Monday - Friday: _________________________ 8:00 am - 6:00 pm Monday - Friday: ____________________________ N/A Saturday: ________________________________ 8:00 am - 6:00 pm Saturday: ___________________________________ N/A Sunday: _________________________________ N/A Sunday: ____________________________________ N/A Holidays: ________________________________ N/A Holidays: ___________________________________ N/A Page 7 of 13 Page 316 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, Yes No operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Noise levels will increase during construction due to construction equipment during the hours of 8:00 AM - 6:00 PM Monday through Saturday. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? Yes No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? Yes No If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? Yes No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? Yes No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum ( over 1,100 gallons) Yes No or chemical products ? If Yes: Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________ Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year) Generally describe proposed storage facilities ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, Yes No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? Yes No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal Yes No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: Construction: ____________________ 0.1 tons per ________________Month (unit of time) Operation : ____________________ N/A tons per ________________ N/A (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: Construction: Waste ________________________________________________________________________________________ will consist of office waste and cardboard items from deliveries. Most of the waste will be recyclable ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ N/A ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: Construction: A________________________________________________________________________________________ refuse container will remain on site during construction and be emptied by a licensed hauler as needed ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ N/A ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 13 Page 317 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? Yes No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: ________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or ________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous Yes No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? Yes No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. Urban Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) Forest Agriculture Aquatic Other (specify): ____________________________________ ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres +/-) Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious 0.15 0.00 -0.15 surfaces Forested 23.66 19.42 -4.24 Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- 3.35 7.57 +4.22 agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) Agricultural 0.00 0.00 0.00 (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) Surface water features 0.00 0.00 0.00 (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) 0.49 0.49 0.00 Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Describe: Limited _______________________________ Use Pervious Gravel 0 0.17 +0.17 ________________________________________ Page 9 of 13 Page 318 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? Yes No i. If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed Yes No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? Yes No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: Dam height: _________________________________ feet Dam length: _________________________________ feet Surface area: _________________________________ acres Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, Yes No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? Yes No If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin Yes No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any Yes No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site Yes No Remediation database? Check all that apply: Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? Yes No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): E734105 ______________________________________________________________________________ iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ The former Greiner Orchard site is approximately 0.25 miles southwest of the project. The Greiner site is under an to environmental easement and _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ includes ground water use restriction, soil management plan, land use restriction, site management plan, and IC/ EC plan. Page 10 of 13 Page 319 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? Yes No If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? Yes No Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ 5.77± feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? Yes No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________ WwA - Williamson silt loam __________% 56.9 ___________________________ MtA - Minoa fine sandy loam __________% 26.3 ____________________________ ArB - Arkport very fine sandy loam __________% 9.5 d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ 2.26 feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: Well Drained: _____% 9.5 of ite Moderately Well Drained: _____% 61.9 of site Poorly Drained _____% 28.6 of ite f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 0-10%: _____% 100 of site 10-15%: _____% of site 15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? Yes No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, Yes No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? Yes No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, Yes No state or local agency? iv. For each identified wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________ NYS Wetland Approximate Size ___________________ NYS Wetland (in a... Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ SYE-11 v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired Yes No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? Yes No j. Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? Yes No k. Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? Yes No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? Yes No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: Principal Aquifer _________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 13 Page 320 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ ______________________________ Grey Squirrel _______________________________ Rabbits ______________________________ Eastern Chipmunks ______________________________ White-tailed Deer _______________________________ Raccoon ______________________________ Migratory Birds n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? Yes No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Extent of community/habitat: Currently: ______________________ acres Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as Yes No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? Indiana Bat and Northern Long Eared Bat, tree clearing will be conducted during the winter months to avoid impacts to these species. p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of Yes No special concern? q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? Yes No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to Yes No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? Yes No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? 19.6 ___________________________________________________________________________ acres (All Areas are Prime Farmland) ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): NRCS _________________________________________________________________________________ Web Soil Survey c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National Yes No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: Biological Community Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? Yes No If Yes: i. CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 13 Page 321 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district Yes No which is listed on of Historic P of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: Archaeological Site Historic Building or District ii. Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Yes No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? Yes No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h. the project site any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local Yes No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Distance between project and resource: _____________________ miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers Yes No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? Yes No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Kelly Sullivan - Bergmann Date_______________________________________ December 21, 2020 Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________ Senior Project Manager PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 Page 322 Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:39 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Potential Contamination History] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Listed] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook. E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Yes Site] E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation E734105 Site - DEC ID] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands NYS Wetland Name] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands NYS Wetland (in acres):1451.0 Size] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - DEC SYE-11 Wetlands Number] E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] No E.2.i. [Floodway] No Full Environmental Page 323 Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] Yes E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] Yes E.2.l. [Aquifers] Yes E.2.l. [Aquifer Names] Principal Aquifer E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] Yes E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species - Indiana Bat Name] E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Places or State Eligible Sites] Workbook. E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No Full Environmental Page 324 Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 Page 325 TOWN OF MANLIUS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES March 8, 2021 APPROVED The Town of Manlius Planning Board convened with the members live streaming from their homes and in accordance with the Executive Order of the Governor to assure compliance with the Open meetings Law. Chairperson Joseph Lupia presided, and the following Members were present: Fred Gilbert, Ann Kelly, Mike LeRoy, Arnie Poltenson, Richard Rossetti and Valerie Beecher. Also, present were Attorney Jamie Sutphen and Town Engineer Douglas Miller. Also, Present: Carson Weinand, Jared Lusk, Dan Bargabus, Steve Calocerinos, Brain Madigan, Robert Switala The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Minutes The minutes of February 22, 2021 were tabled for further review. Wildcat Renewables, LLC – 879 Sanchez Street, San Francisco, CA 94114 Decision – Site Plan and Special Use Permit – Solar Array – 7390 Kirkville Road, East Syracuse, NY 13057 Tax Map # 055.-01-10.1 Member Rossetti made a motion, seconded by Member Kelly and carried unanimously to declare the Town of Manlius Planning Board Lead Agency for SEQR. Attorney Sutphen reviewed the 11 questions in Part 2 of the EAF with the Board and the Board agreed unanimously that the action would have no, or a small impact on the environment. The EAF was filled out accordingly. Member Rossetti made a motion, seconded by Member Kelly and carried unanimously to issue a Negative Declaration under SEQR and authorized the Chairman to sign the short form EAF. Chairman Lupia reviewed the Special Permit Criteria with the Board. Will the project have an adverse effect on adjacent lands, the immediate neighborhood or on the character of the community is the ultimate question and these are the questions the Board must answer: 1. Is the community protected from traffic congestion conflicts, flooding and excessive soil erosion? The Board said yes. 2. Is the community protected from unnecessary noise, lighting and odors? The Board said yes. 3. Does this plan protect the community from inappropriate design and other matters of significance? The Board said yes. Page 326 4. Does the plan ensure the proposed use will be in harmony with the appropriate and orderly development of the district in which it is proposed? The Board said yes. 5. Can any adverse impact be mitigated with compliance with reasonable conditions? The Board said yes. 6. Does the project conform with the Towns Planning objections, for example, do we need any kind of conditions with respect to operations and are there modifications to the development proposal or design guidelines that can attach reasonable conditions to minimize impacts? Member Rossetti asked if putting a timeframe on the project would be applicable. Attorney Sutphen said yes. Members Rossetti and Poltenson would like to understand why the Board has approved so many Solar projects in the last few years and none of them are being built or have applied for a Building Permit. Member Kelly made a motion, seconded by Member Poltenson and carried unanimously to approve the Special Use Permit for a period of seven (7) years to expire March 8, 2028 with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant must Apply for a Building Permit within 1 year. 2. The Applicant must complete the project in 3 years. Chairman Lupia stated that the Board did hear back from the Onondaga County Planning Board and they have no objection to the Special Permit or Site Plan, but they did however have the following recommendation: The applicant is required to coordinate Kirkville Road access plans with the Onondaga County Department of Transportation. To further meet Department requirements, the applicant must submit a copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Department review. The municipality must ensure any mitigation as may be determined by the Department is reflected on the project plans prior to, or as a condition of, municipal approval. Member Rossetti made a motion, seconded by Member LeRoy and carried unanimously to approve the Site Plan. Kenwood Homes – 7519 Morgan Road, Liverpool, NY 13090 Initial Presentation – Mallards Landing, Phase 2, Section 9 – Muscovy Lane between Widgeon and Aylesbury Path – Amended Site Plan – Tax Map # 117.-02-01.1 Dan Bargabos and Steve Calocerinos spoke on behalf of the Applicant. Mr. Bargabos stated that he purchased the property from David Stringer last year, all the approvals were in place and the map was ready to be filed. However, Engineer Miller pointed out that one of the lots is an Army Corp Wetland. The project stopped and a permit is being applied for with the Army Corp of Engineers. One lot on the project is a wetland so they are going to lose it. They would like to make up the lost lot by creating another lot, as a result, the size of some of the other lots will be non-conforming. They would like to combine lots 245 and 246 to make one big lot and have the 4 approved lots split into 5 Page 327 with smaller square footage (32,000 to 36,000) instead of the required 40,000 by Town Code. Member Rossetti said that this board does not have the authority to grant variances for the small lot coverage issue so they would have to see the Zoning Board of Appeals for variances. Chairman Lupia’s concern is that the “new” lots will be significantly smaller than mandated by Town Code and he is wondering if its fair to the other neighbors with larger lots. Mr. Bargabos decided to keep the project as previously approved and not go to the Zoning Board of Appeals. CVE North America, Inc. 109 W. 27th Street, New York, NY 10001 Initial Presentation - Subdivision/Site Plan/Special Use Permit Solar Array - Duguid Road, Manlius, NY 13104 Tax Map # 099.-01-03 Carson Weinand, Jared Lusk, Lara and Christina Tapia spoke on behalf of the Applicant. Mr. Weinand told the Board that the company owns the project long term, they do not sell it off like other companies. He stated that there is 1 parcel (240 acres total with a disturbance of less than 79 acres) that will be subdivided into 4 smaller parcels. Total size of the project will be 16 megawatts, 11 megawatts AC. Members LeRoy and Rossetti and Attorney Sutphen asked why the parcel needs to be subdivided? Mr. Weinand said that due to a maximum system size per parcel, only allowed 5 megawatts AC on a single parcel, pursuant to a New York State energy level, NYSERDA. Member Kelly asked about the 1-mile radius between solar arrays per Town Code. Mr. Lusk said that it is the same project, its just on 3 parcels. Attorney Sutphen will look into this. The Board is concerned about there being separate lots and the project being so close together. Member Beecher asked about a timeline for the project, phases? Mr. Weinand said maybe about 4-6 months. Chairman Lupia asked Engineer Miller if SWPPP materials had been provided and if he had a chance to review them. Town Engineer Miller said that a SWPPP has not been received. Mr. Lusk said the SWPPP was not submitted yet because they wanted feedback on the project first and they are working on it. Attorney Sutphen stated that there is a threshold matter and that the Board needs to see the SWPPP. The Board tabled the matter until more information is received. Page 328 Other Business With there being no further business, Member Gilbert made a motion, seconded by Member Rossetti and carried unanimously to adjourn the Regular Meeting at 7:58 pm. Respectfully submitted, Lisa Beeman, Clerk Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353