May 2021 — FINAL-5.11.21-OCIDA-Board-Regular-Meeting-Packet-reduced.pdf ======================================================================= ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 333 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 130, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 PHONE: 315.435.3770  FAX: 315.435.3669  ONGOVED.COM Meeting Agenda May 11, 2021 8:00 AM Call to Order the Regular Meeting of the Agency A. Approval of Minutes-April 13, 2021 B. Treasurer’s Report C. Payment of Bills D. Conflict of Interest Action Items 1. Taft Road Solar LLC / SLH II, LLC (3101-21-09B) Second Meeting Taft Road Solar LLC and SLH II, LLC are proposing to construct a 3.7 megawatt solar project in the Town of Manlius. The applicants are requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, and real estate transfer taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, and real estate transfer taxes. Representative: Andrew Day, Member, Source Renewables, LLC 2. UR-Ban Village PFA, LLC (3101-21-07A) Second Meeting UR-Ban Village PFA, LLC is proposing to develop 88 residential units at 100 Buckley Road, the former Will & Baumer candle factory site in the Town of Salina. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording tax. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of a SEQRA determination. b. A Resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes. Representative: Vittorio Pascarella, Member, UR-Ban Villages PFA, LLC Page 1 3. Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc. / Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC (3101- 21-08A) Second Meeting Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc. and Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC are proposing the redevelopment of the Camillus Cutlery Company site in the Village of Camillus. The project consists of approximately 60,500 sq. ft. of occupied multi-use space and associated parking. The applicants are requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording tax. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A Resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes. Representative: Douglas Sutherland, Managing Member, Camillus Mills II, LLC 4. C2 NY Sentinel Heights Solar, LLC (3101-21-05A) Second Meeting C2 NY Sentinel Heights Solar, LLC is proposing the construction of 3.375 megawatt solar project in the Town of Lafayette. The applicant is requesting exemption from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A Resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, and real estate transfer taxes. Representative: Elie Schechter, Consultant, C2 Energy Capital, LLC 5. Termination of Project Taft Solar LLC (3101-20-01A) Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board acknowledging the Source Land Holdings LLC / Taft Solar LLC, project number 3101-20-01A, is revoking all financial assistance granted in connection with the project associated with this project number. Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA 2 Page 2 6. White Pine Commerce Park Engineering Services Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board authorizing a previously approved engineering firm to procure, select, coordinate and oversee a sub-contractor in connection with the White Pine Commerce Park Project. Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA Adjourn 3 Page 3 SUBJECT TO BOARD APPROVAL Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Regular Meeting Minutes April 13, 2021 A regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Tuesday, April 13, 2021 via Zoom Teleconference. Patrick Hogan called the meeting to order at 8:00 am with the following: PRESENT: Patrick Hogan Janice Herzog Victor Ianno Steve Morgan Susan Stanczyk ABSENT: Kevin Ryan Fanny Villarreal ALSO PRESENT: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director Nancy Lowery, Secretary Nate Stevens, Treasurer Karen Doster, Recording Secretary, Agency Carolyn Evans-Dean, Economic Development Jeff Davis, Barclay Damon Law Firm Kevin McAuliffe, Barclay Damon Law Firm Amanda Fitzgerald, Barclay Damon Law Firm Brandon Jacobson, Brolex Plank Road Jason Mehl, Brolex Plank Road Vittorio Pascarella, Ur-Ban Villages PFA Steve Calocerinos, Calocerinos Engineering Sarah Stephens, Ur-Ban Villages PFA Douglas Sutherland, Camillus Mills Redevelopment Elie Schechter, C2 NY Sentinel Heights Solar Brian Gerling, Bond, Schoeneck & King Law Firm Andrew Day, Taft Road Solar, LLC Michael Cocquay, Taft Road Solar, LLC Glenn MacKay, OYA Solar, LLC Bernadette Corpun, OYA Solar, LLC (Patrick Hogan shared information as to how the meeting will be conducted in light of COVID- 19.) APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – MARCH 9, 2021 Page 4 Nancy Lowery stated there was an admin error where a couple of names were duplicated under “Present”. She stated it will be corrected. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved the regular meeting minutes of March 9, 2021 meeting. Motion was carried. TREASURER’S REPORT Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of March 2021. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved the Treasurer’s Report for the month of February 2021. Motion was carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Payment of Bills Schedule #454. Steve Morgan asked what project is $23,300 to Ramboll America Engineering is pertaining to. Nate Stevens stated the White Pine project. Steve Morgan asked if Barclay Damon is related to that as well. Nate Stevens stated yes. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved the Payment of Bills Schedule #454 for $756,368.38, PILOT payments to the City of Syracuse for $8,493.64, Syracuse City School District for $14,547.90 and Onondaga County for $9,723.26. Motion was carried. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE The Conflict of Interest was emailed to Board Members present to sign off. 2 Page 5 BROLEX PLANK ROAD LLC (3101-21-03A) SECOND MEETING Janice Herzog recused herself from the meeting due to a conflict. Brandon Jacobson stated the proposed project is in the heart of the Village of North Syracuse. He stated it is one of the remaining larger parcels that is available in the Village. He stated due to the market conditions locally in Onondaga County and nationally, there is a housing shortage. He stated there is a tremendous demand but also some tremendous challenges that will be in their way but hopefully with the support of the IDA they will be able to overcome some of them. He stated lumber has quadrupled in price in the last 10-12 months. He stated they are facing some major challenges to make the project economically viable. He stated the use of the sales tax and mortgage recording tax exemption will help with their project tremendously. He stated currently they are looking at 100-150% increase in lumber and lumber being the largest commodity that will be used on this project, help of the IDA benefits is going to be needed. Steve Morgan asked with this project generating zero FTEs other than then construction jobs, can we grant benefits. Jeff Davis stated yes. He stated there is a provision of the UTEP dealing specifically with apartment housing. He stated we are consistent with our UTEP and there are other projects the IDA has done that are also consistent with the UTEP that do not generate FTE. He stated the most familiar would be the solar company that came before the Board recently. He stated they met the definition for a project as does this. Nate Stevens stated there are 2 FTEs on the application and asked if that is correct. Brandon Jacobson stated yes and they will have a manager and a maintenance person full time. Patrick Hogan asked if there has been a lot of interest in the project and asked if it is 55 and over. Brandon Jacobson stated they are targeting the senior community. He stated the apartments will have elevators and there really isn’t anything in the village that offers that amenity so in the event that somebody can’t do stairs they have an option for them. He stated they can’t discriminate against who is going to rent the apartments but they do feel that 55 and over is the target. He stated they do understand the price to build a new home has increased tremendously so it gives another option to people who are in the area who want to stay in the area, utilize sidewalks and the amenities the Village has without the burden of homeownership. 3 Page 6 Patrick Hogan stated it will make an equally accessible walkable community and a great concept for the Village. He stated many communities are striving for things like this and applauds Brolex. Susan Stanczyk asked how many units there are. Brandon Jacobson stated there are 2 separate 3 story buildings with a total of 48 units. Susan Stanczyk asked what the rent range is. Brandon Jacobson stated they are going to range from $1,000 to $1,250 for 1 and 2 bedroom apartments. Nancy Lowery stated a public hearing was held and Town of Clay Supervisor Ulatowski called inquiring about its location. She stated he followed up with an email to say he supports the benefits being requested, sales and use and mortgage recording tax. She stated there was a letter of support from the Village Mayor echoing the same support for the requested benefits. Jeff Davis stated Barclay Damon reviewed the SEQR materials provided for the project including the EAF and noted its completeness. He stated this is an unlisted action under SEQR and an uncoordinated review is being done. He stated the first resolution before the Board related to SEQR is a recommendation for a resolution for a Negative Declaration under SEQR with a finding there will be no significant adverse effect on the environment as a result of the project. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the Brolex Plank Road LLC project. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, and mortgage recording taxes. Motion was carried. Janice Herzog returned to the meeting. 4 Page 7 UR-BAN VILLAGES PFA, LLC (3101-21-07A) INITIAL MEETING Vittorio Pascarella stated they are a construction and property management company operating in and around the Syracuse area for about 40 years. He stated their roots were initially established in the construction field, more specifically residential housing. He stated over time they became very familiar and very good at rehabilitating old deteriorating properties and maintaining them under their management wing. He stated as of now they own about 600 units, 200 in the Town of Salina and 400 in and around the Syracuse area. He stated they are local to the area, lifelong residents in the Town of Salina and very familiar with the Will and Baumer site. He stated the site has been a blighted broken down property for some time. He stated a couple years ago he drove by, saw a for sale sign and decided to take on the task for a multifamily reuse project. He stated the initial approach was removing some of the less attractive structures, rehabilitating the iconic brick building, adding some new skin to some of the sound structures and taking down some of the shed like buildings. He stated their architect convinced them to keep most of the buildings as opposed to knocking them down. He stated they found they could reuse some of the older shed like buildings for covered parking and in this climate it seemed to be very welcomed by the community. He stated the overall project is going to be 200-250 units. He stated due to the size of the project they are looking to split it into three phases. He stated phase one will consist of a cleanup, site work, demolition and environmental. He stated it will include 88 units with 1-2 bedrooms ranging from 850 to 1,500 square foot. He stated they will accommodate a cross section of all type of residents from all generations. He stated the units will be handicap accessible. He stated for future phases they are looking at commercial business. He stated phase one specifically will have three new hires in the first year, one real estate and two maintenance staff. He stated as they bring more units online they will add an additional 3-4 people. He stated the project has obtained tremendous support from members of the town and they have letters of support from the Town Supervisor and town councilors. He stated National Grid is also supporting the project with an economic development grant. He stated given the condition of the property and the amount of working capital it is going to take to bring this back to life, the project cannot occur without a supportive community. He stated another curve ball thrown at them is the cost of materials has sky rocketed. Robert Petrovich stated he briefed the County Executive on this project and he is very excited and supportive of it because it is an investment in an area that has been neglected for quite some 5 Page 8 time. He stated it will certainly provide a good aesthetic redo of that particular area. He stated the County Executive is happy to see this project come forward. Patrick Hogan stated that area borders an area he represents on the City Council and he is so encouraged with the materials he received about the project. He asked if they plan to keep some of the buildings and demolishing some of the others. Vittorio Pascarella stated initially that is what they anticipated but the plan is to keep all the buildings on site. He stated they are keeping and rehabbing the iconic brick building in front for apartments. He stated they are going to keep the old shed like structures for covered parking which solves some of the issues some people might have with finding covered parking. He stated if they can reuse the old sheds it helps with sustainability and feasibility of the project. Patrick Hogan asked about SEQR. Kevin McAuliffe stated his understanding is the Town is going to function as lead agency. Jeff Davis stated for SEQR he is not sure the notice has been received yet but this should be a coordinated review so this Board does not have to do its own independent SEQR analysis. He asked that the applicant make sure that is accomplished. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the Ur-Ban Villages PFA, LLC project. Motion was carried. CAMILLUS MILLS REDEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC./CAMILLUS MILLS II, LLC (3101-21-08A) INITIAL MEETING Doug Sutherland stated before the Board is a request for mortgage and sales tax relief for the second phase of the Camillus Mills project. He stated the site is the old Camillus Cutlery. He stated the first phase of the project was completed in 2017 and was the rehabilitation of the historic old headquarters building. He stated the second phase is new construction being built on the concrete slab of the original Camillus Cutlery factory. He stated it was a wood frame building that went up in flames in 2013. He stated they were brought in by the site owner several years later and looked at it with the idea that they wanted to create a new project using the historic building plus two more buildings in a campus like way or a combination of buildings that felt like they had always existed. He stated the drawings in the board packet shows a building for phase two that resembles the old Camillus Cutlery factory and recalls the significant 6 Page 9 features of that building. He stated the use is primarily residential with 15 apartments and 6,500 square feet of commercial space. He stated it is all a Brownfield and enrolled in the DEC voluntary cleanup program. He stated it is in a flood plain with 9 Mile Creek immediately east of the property with about 90% of the site they are proposing to develop now in that flood plain. He stated there are some challenges to it but the first phase project was well received. He stated they are approaching the second project with knowledge learned from the first and they think they will be well received again. He stated it has been reviewed by the State Historic Preservation Office because of the historic building next door and they have approved the plans. He stated they are now in Washington with the National Parks Service for final review which should happen in the next couple of weeks. He stated they are part way through their Village approvals, the SEQR process is well underway and should be completed in the near future. He stated they hope to start construction later this year. Steve Morgan asked if Tom Blair is involved in the organization as part of Camillus Mills LLC. Douglas Sutherland stated Tom Blair is 20% partner of Camillus Mills Phase 2 LLC. Steve Morgan stated he is going to abstain from voting because Tom Blair is doing some legal work for him. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc./Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC project. Steve Morgan abstained. Motion was carried. LEGAL ADVICE SESSION Jeff Davis stated he would suggest going into an executive session with regard to a discussion on the potential acquisition of parcels of land. He stated that discussion could potentially effect the value of the land as well as a legal advice session to discuss what could be potential litigation. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Patrick Hogan, the OCIDA Board went into executive session at 8:35 am. Motion was carried. 7 Page 10 Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board adjourned executive session at 9:00 am. Motion was carried. PURCHASE CONTRACT EXECUTION Jeff Davis stated there are two proposed resolutions before the Board in regard to the acquisition of certain land. He stated the Agency is required to make a determination with respect to environmental impacts and any Type 1 or unlisted actions. He stated the environmental assessment form has been prepared by the Agency to determine whether the acquisition of the subject properties may have a significant effect on the environment. He stated this action is limited only to the acquisition of these lands as the Agency does not have a project before it concerning the use of the property. He stated the Agency has no current or proposed plans to develop the property. He stated since the Agency currently has no project for it or plans to develop the property in any way, any consideration to potential impacts associated with future development of the property would be purely speculative. He stated should the property be made available at some future date by the Agency for development, that future project or development would be required to undergo a complete and thorough environmental review pursuant to SEQR. He stated they have reviewed and prepared the EAF. He stated the acquisition of these lands constitutes an unlisted action under SEQR and does not direct any subsequent development or commit the Agency to any future actions. He stated any potential future development if it were to occur would be dependent upon environmental conditions and other factors which are currently unknown. He stated the Agency’s review of the project would be no less protected of the environments since any potential future development of the project or property must undergo a thorough environmental review pursuant to SEQR. He stated therefore this Agency acting as Lead Agency recommends that there be determined that there will be no significant adverse effect on the environment as a result of OCIDA acquiring these two parcels and will not require an environmental impact statement. He stated as a result the Agency is authorized to prepare a negative declaration with respect to the acquisition of these two parcels. He stated there are two resolutions before the Board that are very similar with regard to SEQR. He stated they are basically identical except for the project addresses. He stated he would request a motion to adopt the SEQR resolutions as he just read. 8 Page 11 Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution issuing a negative declaration for each of the two proposed land acquisition resolutions. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the Executive Director to enter into two purchase contracts and any related documents with respect to two parcels of Property. Motion was carried. Chairperson Patrick Hogan had to leave the IDA meeting and turned over the meeting to Vice Chairperson Janice Herzog. HOLD FOR APRIL 29 SPECIAL MEETING TO REVIEW AND DISCUSS SUPPLEMENTAL DRAFT EIS AND SET PUBLIC COMMENT AND HEARING SCHEDULE. Jeff Davis stated a vote is needed to hold a special meeting so it can be appropriately noticed. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution to hold a Special Meeting on Thursday, April 29, 2021 to review and discuss supplemental draft EIS and set public comment and hearing schedule. Motion was carried. C2 NY SENTINEL HEIGHTS SOLAR, LLC (3101-21-05A) INITIAL MEETING Robert Petrovich stated Brian Gerling from Bond Schoeneck &King is conflict counsel and is representing the Agency on this project as Barclay Damon has a conflict. Elie Schechter stated he is a consultant for C2 Energy Capital and they have been developing this community solar project for about 1.5 years. He stated this is a project that is going to benefit the community so anyone in the greater Onondaga County area who is a National Grid rate payer that wants to subscribe to buy the electricity from this solar project at a lower rate and otherwise buying from a utility, would have an opportunity to do that. He stated they applied to National Grid for an inter-connection agreement. He stated they received confirmation from National Grid that there is capacity to connect this line along Sentinel Heights Road in Lafayette. He 9 Page 12 stated they worked with the civil engineer to finalize their plan to go to the Zoning and Planning Board in the Town of Lafayette. He stated they received those approvals late last year and they were able to reserve NYSERTA incentives. He stated during the process of submitting the application and going through the review with the town, the Planning Board told them that their preference for these projects is to enter into a PILOT agreement and work through the IDA to finalize that PILOT Agreement. He stated they have included a SEQR negative declaration from the Planning Board as lead agency along with other information. He stated they hope to break ground later this year so the project can be operational by the end of 2021. Janice Herzog stated the equipment they will use onsite will be specialized and asked how they expect to meet the local labor regulations in the Agency PILOT. She asked where they source their equipment from and how do they go about getting their labor. Elie Schechter stated the equipment is very specialized components and are not going to be able to source within Onondaga County. He stated their expectation is that those materials will be purchased elsewhere and brought in for the project. He stated based on everything they have looked for project requirements, their expectation is that they are going to fulfill the local labor requirements of installing those components and the electrical components. He stated the trackers which are the components that follow the sun throughout the day are specialized components that involve specialized labor that may be a little bit more constraining but their expectation is the labor would be fulfilled through Onondaga County and neighboring counties even if the actual material is not. Janice Herzog asked what the percentage of local labor is. Elie Schechter stated they can certainly commit to 75% of the man power on site. Nate Stevens stated in the Agency application the local labor policy states 100% local labor to actually construct the improvement on the parcel has to come from a 10 county area that is specifically named in the application. He stated there is not a requirement for the buying of equipment but the requirement is specifically related to the labor of the installation of the investment. Ellie Schechter stated that is their expectation and may have misunderstood the question. He stated their construction team has been working to fulfill that obligation that 100% of local labor would come from Onondaga County and neighboring counties even if the material is outside the county. He stated he is in agreement with that. 10 Page 13 Janice Herzog asked who is ultimately responsible for maintaining the equipment and to make sure it is functioning. Elie Schechter stated ultimately that will be the responsibility of National Grid. He stated if National Grid is down or if there is a power outage, they can’t produce power. He stated if a tree falls down on a line or if there is a problem with a substation, then there system will have to go off line along with the National Grid system. He stated as long as National Grid system is online then their project will be online. He stated they are responsible for maintaining their project and ensuring it continues to be online and producing power. Janice Herzog stated we are going to be relying more and more on these types of solar projects in our community because of the aggressive green power push. She asked if an employee goes out to brush off the snow if need be. Elie Schechter stated if there is a heavy snow and the panels are covered in snow, they will be producing very little power but will produce some. He stated most companies will wait for the first sunny day after a snow storm because as soon as some of that light gets through, even if just a little bit, the panels start to get warm. He stated a lot of that energy gets absorbed as heat and not necessarily electricity. He stated that first sunny day will clear a lot of snow off the panels and that is what most companies do. Brian Gerling stated the Town of Lafayette has taken the designation as lead agency on SEQR and has issued a negative declaration. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the C2NY Sentinel Heights Solar, LLC project. Motion was carried. TAFT ROAD SOLAR, LLC/SLH II, LLC (3101-21-09B) INITIAL MEETING Andrew Day stated the application is an update to the previous resolution for this application. He stated in the development process the original concept had a 5 megawatt AC project that included battery storage. He stated through the site plan, permitting and SEQR process they adapted the site plan which resulted in a smaller system due to space constraints and taking into account DEC wetlands etc. He stated as a result the systems size changed and the cost decreased. He stated the original application had Source Land Holdings LLC as the landowner and they bought the company which was a wholly owned subsidiary of Source Renewables. He 11 Page 14 stated like SLH II, LLC it is just the land holding company so they have the resolution under Source Land Holdings and the land had closed to SLH II as a separate land owning entity. He stated the purpose of this today is to update the application with proper size, design, cost and land holding. Robert Petrovich states this is a basically a recasting of the project at a smaller level. Jeff Davis agreed and stated the Agency needs to go back through and rehold a public hearing. He stated the Board will have to vote again on the project. Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the Taft Road Solar, LLC/SLH II, LLC project. Motion was carried. ABUNDANT SOLAR PROJECT (E1) LLC Amanda Fitzgerald stated the Board approved financial assistance and closed the Abundant project in Skaneateles. She stated a few months ago a second Abundant project was approved in the Town of Elbridge. She stated much like the first Abundant project after the Board approved the benefits going to the Abundant Company with a specified ownership, the ownership of this project company had changed. She stated the company is in front of the Board today requesting approval for the change in ownership. She stated the different between this Abundant matter and Taft Solar is that here it is only the membership interest that is changing and not the total project company. She stated Abundant will remain the company that is getting the benefits, just the membership interest has changed. She stated Barclay Damon has looked through the documents of the new membership owner and recommend the Board approve the change in membership ownership. Janice Herzog asked if this is a joint partnership. Amanda Fitzgerald stated Abundant Solar Power E1 LLC will remain the entity that is receiving the financial assistance but the ownership interest in the LLC has been sold. 12 Page 15 Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the sale of the membership interest of the Abundant Solar Project. Motion was carried. OYA CHURCH ROAD A LLC (3101-20-04A) Amanda Fitzgerald stated this is the same situation we had with Abundant. She stated Barclay Damon reviewed underlying entity documents of the new membership owners and recommends approving the sale of membership ownership. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the sale of the membership interest of the OYA Church Road A LLC project. Motion was carried. NEW YORK SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN RAILWAY CORPORATION Robert Petrovich stated we have a lease hold interest in this entity’s project and rail line running through the city as part of a PILOT from way back when. He stated they are asking for assistance from the Agency to be able to make improvements to the West Onondaga Street Bridge. He stated a couple of years ago some pieces of concrete fell off the bridge and they temporarily restored it with something that is not as aesthetically pleasing as they would like. He stated they are applying for grant and hoping to rebuild the bridge going over West Onondaga Street in a better and more aesthetic manner. He stated they are asking for our agreement and support in that regard because we have a lease/leasehold relationship with them. He stated it is simply a resolution of support from the Board so they can proceed with their grant application. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution supporting the New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway Corporation seeking funding sources for improvements to the bridge that passes over West Onondaga Street in the City of Syracuse and related structures. Motion was carried. 13 Page 16 Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board adjourned the meeting at 9:30 am. Motion was carried. _________________________________ Nancy Lowery, Secretary 14 Page 17 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 333 WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 130, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 PHONE: 315.435.3770 • FAX: 315.435.3669 April 30, 2021 2021 Budget Current YTD Revenue / Expense / Income Current Period Current YTD Amount Change to Budget Operating Revenue 324,785 499,517 1,646,000 (1,146,483) Administrative Expense 45,638 144,766 1,008,000 (863,234) Operating/Program Exp. 151,198 244,117 638,000 (393,883) Net Ordinary Income 127,949 110,635 - 110,635 Current Assets Current YTD Prior YTD Total Cash 4,155,061 2,652,987 Less Pass Through Received 4,010 2,778 Available Cash 4,151,051 2,650,209 Receivables (less pass through rec.) 604,770 1,739,647 Grant Reimbursements - 268,733 Total 4,755,821 4,658,589 Reserve for Contracts County Operations 2021 863,234 333 W. Washington St 2021 Rent 50,015 OBG WPCP CO #4 Additional Studies 418,947 JMT 800 Hiawatha Engineering 11,816 Barclay Damon WPCP Options 50,000 Total 1,394,014 Receivables 0-120 days 382,746 > 120 days 222,024 Total 604,770 Page 18 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Profit and Loss April 2021 TOTAL Income 500 Operating Revenue 2116 Fees 2116.1 Agency Fees 323,750.00 2116.2 Application Fees 1,000.00 Total 2116 Fees 324,750.00 Total 500 Operating Revenue 324,750.00 501 Non-Operating Revenue 2401 Interest Income 35.80 Total 501 Non-Operating Revenue 35.80 Total Income $324,785.80 GROSS PROFIT $324,785.80 Expenses 6400 Operating Expense 6402 Rent 14,984.58 6405 General Accounting 1,193.40 6406 Other Professional Services 360.00 6406.50 Consulting Services 10,000.00 Total 6406 Other Professional Services 10,360.00 6407 Administrative Expense 45,637.88 6408 Meeting Expenses 1,687.06 6410 Office Expense 1,443.71 6412 Other Operating Expense 6412.1 COVID-19 Grants 1,622.01 Total 6412 Other Operating Expense 1,622.01 Total 6400 Operating Expense 76,928.64 6440 Legal Fees 6445 Special Counsel 6445.01 Blue Rock BS&K 3,450.75 Total 6445 Special Counsel 3,450.75 6450 Barclay Damon 6470 WPCP Development 6470.1 Options 6,136.25 6470.2 Land Purchases 26,368.19 6470.3 JMA SEQR/Envir 7,045.00 Total 6470 WPCP Development 39,549.44 6480 Roth Legal 2,616.52 Total 6450 Barclay Damon 42,165.96 Total 6440 Legal Fees 45,616.71 Page 19 Accrual Basis Thursday, May 6, 2021 01:54 PM GMT-04:00 1/2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Profit and Loss April 2021 TOTAL 6500 Agency Program Expenses 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 6510.2 Site Analysis 23,300.50 6513 WPCP Option Agree Fees app 9-22-20 50,000.00 Total 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 73,300.50 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 6530.3 Engineering 990.00 Total 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 990.00 Total 6500 Agency Program Expenses 74,290.50 Total Expenses $196,835.85 NET OPERATING INCOME $127,949.95 NET INCOME $127,949.95 Page 20 Accrual Basis Thursday, May 6, 2021 01:54 PM GMT-04:00 2/2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of April 30, 2021 TOTAL ASSETS Current Assets Bank Accounts 200 Cash 0.00 200.1 Cash - M & T Checking 3,273,618.23 200.2 Cash - M & T Money Maker Savings 890,350.53 200.4 Destiny USA Restricted Cash -8,957.82 210 Petty Cash 50.00 Total 200 Cash 4,155,060.94 Total Bank Accounts $4,155,060.94 Accounts Receivable 380 Accounts Rec. 380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 390,764.69 Total 380 Accounts Rec. 390,764.69 Total Accounts Receivable $390,764.69 Other Current Assets 391 Long Tern Receivable 222,024.00 Total Other Current Assets $222,024.00 Total Current Assets $4,767,849.63 Page 21 Accrual Basis Thursday, May 6, 2021 01:55 PM GMT-04:00 1/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of April 30, 2021 TOTAL Fixed Assets 100 Land 101 White Pines Commerce Park 2,070,401.50 101.1 WPCP GEIS 101.101 CHA GEIS 1 267,452.05 101.102 CHA GEIS 2 219,439.36 101.104 GEIS Reg Plan Board Overview 19,797.74 Total 101.1 WPCP GEIS 506,689.15 101.2 WPCP Legal 69,774.25 101.3 Engineering Services 52,675.00 101.301 Temporary Access 4,055.44 101.4 Environmental/Demo Services 10,318.98 Total 101.3 Engineering Services 67,049.42 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 101.501 Land Purchases 1,160,063.57 101.502 Closing Costs 3,168.14 Total 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 1,163,231.71 Total 101 White Pines Commerce Park 3,877,146.03 106 North Salina Properties 0.00 106.1 435 North Salina 17,083.55 106.3 435 North Salina Building 634,421.53 Total 106 North Salina Properties 651,505.08 107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42 Total 100 Land 5,133,491.53 104 Machinery & Equipment 104.1 Office Furniture 1,429.00 104.2 Equipment 1,432.40 Total 104 Machinery & Equipment 2,861.40 211 A/D Office Furniture -2,862.00 213 A/D Buildings -81,335.00 Total Fixed Assets $5,052,155.93 Other Assets 240 Blue Sky Redevelopment 1,641.76 Total Other Assets $1,641.76 TOTAL ASSETS $9,821,647.32 Page 22 Accrual Basis Thursday, May 6, 2021 01:55 PM GMT-04:00 2/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of April 30, 2021 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Liabilities Current Liabilities Other Current Liabilities 600 Accounts Payable 0.00 600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 144,765.65 600.206 Mileage Reimbursement 92.34 600.208 BlueRock Energy Agreement Deposit 25,000.00 600.209 Syracuse Rail Overpayment 500.00 Total 600 Accounts Payable 170,357.99 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 603 PILOT Pass Thru 8,018.69 604 Other Pass Thrus 74,063.70 Total 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 82,082.39 631 Due to Other Governments 631.1 Towns 631.12 Dewitt 140.76 Total 631.1 Towns 140.76 631.3 Schools 631.305 Baldwinsville 1.00 631.315 East Syracuse-Minoa 747.66 631.356 Syracuse 1,489.19 Total 631.3 Schools 2,237.85 631.4 Onondaga County 1,220.36 631.5 City of Syracuse 411.36 Total 631 Due to Other Governments 4,010.33 Total Other Current Liabilities $256,450.71 Total Current Liabilities $256,450.71 Total Liabilities $256,450.71 Equity 3900 Equity Unreserved 6,735,894.07 3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 2,345,838.63 463 Reserve For Contracts 1,394,013.54 465 Equity - Unreserved -1,021,184.54 Net Income 110,634.91 Total Equity $9,565,196.61 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $9,821,647.32 Page 23 Accrual Basis Thursday, May 6, 2021 01:55 PM GMT-04:00 3/3 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILL - SCHEDULE #456 May 11, 2021 GENERAL EXPENSES 1. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 7,181.25 Inv#5118330, Legal thru 3-31-21 2. FEDEX $ 22.10 Inv#7-344-05489, Shipping 3. BROWN & BROWN EMPIRE STATE $ 5,809.00 Inv#5196120, 2021 D&O Insurance Premium TOTAL $ 13,012.35 1 Page 24 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILL - SCHEDULE #456 May 11, 2021 PILOT Payments 1. CITY OF SYRACUSE $ 1,981.29 2021 PILOT Payments 2. ONONDAGA COUNTY $ 9,526.00 2021 PILOT Payments 3. TOWN OF CAMILLUS $ 5,200.68 2021 Finger Lakes Railway PILOT Payment 4. TOWN OF DEWITT $ 156.23 2021 PILOT Payments 5. TOWN OF ELBRIDGE $ 2,118.96 2021 Finger Lakes Railway PILOT Payment 6. TOWN OF GEDDES $ 70.50 2021 Finger Lakes Railway PILOT Payment 7. TOWN OF ONONDAGA $ 3.15 1st Quarter 2021 Syracuse Rail PILOT Payment 8. VILLAGE OF CAMILLUS $ 899.40 2021 Finger Lakes Railway PILOT Payment 9. VILLAGE OF SOLVAY $ 563.46 2021 Finger Lakes Railway PILOT Payment 10. EAST SYRACUSE MINOA CSD $ 747.66 1st 2021 Armoured One PILOT Payment 11. JAMESVILLE DEWITT CSD $ 101.26 1st Quarter 2021 Syracuse Rail PILOT Payment 12. JORDAN ELBRIDGE CSD $ 17,938.33 2021 Finger Lakes Railway PILOT Payment 1 Page 25 Schedule #456 page 2 13. MARCELLUS CSD $ 268.50 2021 Finger Lakes Railway PILOT Payment 14. SOLVAY UNION FSD $ 3,597.08 2021 Finger Lakes Railway PILOT Payment 15. SYRACUSE CSD $ 1,489.21 1st 2021 Armoured One PILOT Payment 16. WEST GENESEE CSD $ 12,632.04 1st 2021 Armoured One PILOT Payment TOTAL $ 57,293.75 2 Page 26 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESERVE FOR CONTRACTS 4/30/2021 CONTRACT TOTAL PORTION BALANCE DESCRIPTION TERM CONTRACT PAID OUTSTANDING ONONDAGA COUNTY OED 2021 1-1-21-12-31-21 $1,008,000.00 $144,765.65 $863,234.35 333 W. WASHINGTON ST 2021 RENT 1-1-21-12-31-21 $65,000.00 $14,984.58 $50,015.42 OBG WPCP CO #4 ADDITIONAL STUDIES 11-30-18-12-31-21 $800,000.00 $381,052.63 $418,947.37 JMT 800 HIAWATHA ENGINEERING 2/13/19-12-31-21 $25,000.00 $13,183.60 $11,816.40 BARCLAY DAMON WPCP OPTIONS 11/30/20-12-31-21 $200,000.00 $150,000.00 $50,000.00 $2,098,000.00 $703,986.46 $1,394,013.54 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 4/30/2021 AGENCY FEES RECEIVABLE $381,246.00 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE GENERAL $1,500.00 QUASI-EQUITY LOAN RECEIVABLE $0.00 GRANTS RECEIVABLE $0.00 LONG TERM RECEIVABLE $222,024.00 TOTAL $604,770.00 Page 27 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency DRAFT Project Summary 4/12/2021 1. Project Taft Solar, LLC 2. Project Number 3101-21-09B 3. Location Manlius 4. School District East Syracuse-Minoa School District 6. Project Type Solar Panel Array and Energy Storage 5. Tax Parcel(s) 034.-01-20.1 Manlius 7.Total Project Cost $ 5,215,600 8. Total Jobs 1.5 Land $ - 8A. Job Retention 0.0 Site Work $ 500,000 8B: Job Creation 1.5 Building $ 4,515,600 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ - Equipment Subject to NYS Production $ - Exemption Engineering/Architecture Fees $ - Financial Charges $ - Legal Fees $ 200,000 Other- Solar Installation Labor $ - Cost Benefit Analysis Taft Solar, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Abatement Cost $ 220,244 Sales Tax $ 37,128 Mortgage Tax $ - Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $ 183,116 New Investment $ 8,556,696 PILOT Payments $ 314,651 Project Wages (10 years) $ 1,872,000 Construction Wages $ 1,088,250 Construct a 3.7 MW Solar Project at 6966 East Taft Rd in the Town of Manlius. Employee Benefits (10 years) $ - Project Capital Investment $ 5,215,600 New Sales Tax Generated $ - Agency Fees $ 66,195 Agency Legal Fees $ 13,039 Benefit:Cost Ratio 39 :1 Page 28 Taft Solar, LLC DRAFT 4/12/2021 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet Current Revenue Generated by Parcel $ 2,275 Expected Revenue from the Parcel if no project occurred $ 56,386 Projected Year 1 Revenue to be generated as a result of the project: $12,950 Scheduled PILOT Payments $ 314,651 Total Project Cost $ 5,215,600 OCIDA Estimate of Project Value $ 1,253,900 Projected MW to be generated 3.7 East Syracuse-Minoa Full Tax Payment without Year Onondaga County Manlius Total PILOT Net Exemption School District PILOT 14.6% 13.6% 71.7% 100.0% 2020-2021 $ 333 $ 309.94 $ 1,632.29 $ 2,275 1 $ 1,895 $ 1,764 $ 9,291 $ 12,950 $ 8,745 $ (4,205) 2 $ 1,933 $ 1,799 $ 9,477 $ 13,209 $ 8,920 $ (4,289) 3 $ 1,972 $ 1,835 $ 9,666 $ 13,473 $ 9,098 $ (4,375) 4 $ 2,011 $ 1,872 $ 9,859 $ 13,743 $ 9,280 $ (4,463) 5 $ 2,051 $ 1,910 $ 10,057 $ 14,017 $ 9,466 $ (4,552) 6 $ 2,092 $ 1,948 $ 10,258 $ 14,298 $ 9,655 $ (4,643) 7 $ 2,134 $ 1,987 $ 10,463 $ 14,584 $ 9,848 $ (4,736) 8 $ 2,177 $ 2,026 $ 10,672 $ 14,875 $ 10,045 $ (4,831) 9 $ 2,220 $ 2,067 $ 10,886 $ 15,173 $ 10,246 $ (4,927) 10 $ 2,265 $ 2,108 $ 11,103 $ 15,476 $ 10,451 $ (5,026) 11 $ 2,310 $ 2,150 $ 11,325 $ 15,786 $ 10,660 $ (5,126) 12 $ 2,356 $ 2,193 $ 11,552 $ 16,102 $ 10,873 $ (5,229) 13 $ 2,403 $ 2,237 $ 11,783 $ 16,424 $ 11,090 $ (5,333) 14 $ 2,451 $ 2,282 $ 12,019 $ 16,752 $ 11,312 $ (5,440) 15 $ 2,501 $ 2,328 $ 12,259 $ 17,087 $ 11,538 $ (5,549) 16 $ 2,551 $ 2,374 $ 12,504 $ 17,429 $ 66,591 $ 49,162 17 $ 2,602 $ 2,422 $ 12,754 $ 17,778 $ 67,923 $ 50,145 18 $ 2,654 $ 2,470 $ 13,009 $ 18,133 $ 69,281 $ 51,148 19 $ 2,707 $ 2,520 $ 13,270 $ 18,496 $ 70,667 $ 52,171 20 $ 2,761 $ 2,570 $ 13,535 $ 18,866 $ 72,080 $ 53,214 $ 46,045 $ 42,864 $ 225,742 $ 314,651 $ 497,767 $ 183,116 Page 29 Source Renewables, LLC 545 Steamboat Road Greenwich, CT 06830 April 6, 2021 Nancy Lowery Office of Economic Development Onondaga County 333 W. Washington Street, Suite 130 Syracuse, NY 13202 nancylowery@ongov.net RE: Taft Solar LLC Application Update Dear Nancy – The purpose of this letter is to update information pertaining to the Application for Benefits dated February 5, 2020 submitted by our project company Taft Solar LLC to the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency. We request that the application be amended with the following changes: 1. The Real Estate Holding Company name should be changed from Source Land Holdings, LLC to SLH II, LLC. SLH II, LLC is a 100% owned subsidiary of Source Renewables, LLC formed in Delaware in October of 2020 and authorized to conduct business in the State of New York. 2. The applicant’s address should be updated to 545 Steamboat Road, Greenwich CT 06830 and phone number updated to 917-426-0805. 3. Please include Barry Carrigan of Nixon Peabody LLP as authorized company council. 4. The project size and design has been adjusted to 3.7 MW AC/ 4.42 MW DC single axis tracker solar array without battery storage as part of design requirements from the Town of Manlius and input from the NYDEC and Army Corps. The footprint is within the scope of the original application. 5. The total project cost should be adjusted to $5,215,600. 6. The gross amount of goods and services subject to State and local Sales and US tax is estimated to be $464,100 resulting in a sales tax amount of $37,128 at an 8% rate. Thank you for making these changes to the application. We are enthusiastic to begin construction of this project in the next couple of months. We appreciate the support of the Onondaga County IDA in bringing this beneficial project to fruition. Sincerely, Andrew Day Manager Taft Solar, LLC Page 30 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPLICATION FOR BENEFITS 1. Fill in all blanks using “none”, “not applicable” or “not available”. If you have any questions about the way to respond, please call the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency at 315-435-3770. 2. If providing an estimate put “(est.)” after the figure or answer. If more space is needed to answer any specific question, attach a separate sheet. 3. If the OCIDA Board approves benefits, it is the company’s responsibility to obtain and submit all necessary forms and documents. (ST-60, PILOT Agreement) 4. When completed, return this Application by mail or fax to the Agency at the address indicated below. A signed application may also be submitted electronically in PDF format to Nate Stevens at nstevens@ongov.net. An Application will not be considered by the Agency until the Application fee has been received. 5. The Agency will not give final approval for this Application until the Agency receives a completed NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form concerning the Project, which is the subject of this Application. The form is available at http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html. 6. Please note the Public Officers Law declares all records in the possession of the OCIDA (with certain limited exceptions) are open to public inspection and copying. If the Applicant is of the opinion that there are elements of the Project which are in the nature of trade secrets which, if disclosed to the public or otherwise widely disseminated, would cause substantial injury to the Applicant’s competitive position, this Applicant must identify such elements in writing and request that such elements be kept confidential. In accordance with Article 6 of the Public Officer’s Law, the OCIDA may also redact personal, private, and/or proprietary information from publicly disseminated documents. 7. The Applicant will be required to pay the Agency Application fee and, if accepted as a project of the agency, all administrative and legal fees as stated in Section VI of the Application. 8. A complete application consists of the following 9 items:  This Application  Local Access Agreement  Employment Plan  Conflict of Interest  A feasibility statement indicating the need for the requested benefits  Description of project, Site Plans/Sketches, and Maps  NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form  A check payable to the Agency in the amount of $1,000  A check payable to Barclay Damon LLP in the amount of $2,500 9. This Application was adopted by the OCIDA Board on November 19, 2019. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 1 Page 31 It is the policy of the Agency that any project receiving benefits from the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency will utilize 100% local contractors and local labor for the construction period of the project unless a waiver is granted in writing by the Agency. Return to: Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Attn: Nate Stevens 333 W. Washington Street, Suite 130 Syracuse, NY 13202 Phone: 315-435-3770 | Fax: 315-435-3669 nstevens@ongov.net Section I: Applicant Information Please answer all questions. Use “None”, “Not Applicable” and “See Attached” where necessary. A) Applicant information-company receiving benefits: Applicant Name: Taft Solar LLC Applicant Address: 41545 W Steamboat Road, Elm St, Suite GreenwichCT C, Greenwich, CT06830 06830 Phone: (480) (917)272-1542 426-0805 Fax: http://sourcerenew.com/ Website: E-mail: aday@sourcerenew.com Federal ID#: 84-4135053 NAICS: 221114 Delaware 2020 State and Year of Incorporation/Organization: __________________________________________ Will a Real Estate Holding Company be utilized to own the Project property/ facility? x☐Yes ☐No What is the name of the Real Estate Holding Company: Source SLH II Land LLC Holdings LLC Federal ID#: 84-2449887 85-3882834 State and Year of Incorporation/Organization: Delaware 2017 List of stockholders, members, or partners of Real Estate Holding Company: Source Renewables LLC ________________________________________________________________________________ B) Individual Completing Application: Name: Michael Cocquyt Title: Planner Address: 300 State St. Suite 201, Rochester NY 14614 Phone: (585) 287-9087 Fax: E-mail: mcocquyt@labellapc.com Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 2 Page 32 Delaware, 2020 C) Company Contact (if different from individual completing application): Name: Andrew Day Title: Member Address: 41 545WSteamboat Elm St, Suite C, Greenwich, Road, GreenwichCT CT06830 06830 Phone: (203) (917)542-5651 426-0805 Cell Phone: (480) 272-1542 E-mail: aday@sourcerenew.com D) Company Counsel: Name of Attorney: Peter Barry C. Trimarchi Carrigan Firm Name: Nixon Peabody LLP Address: 677 Broadway, 10th Floor, Albany NY 12207-2996 Phone: (518) (585) 427-2671 263-1591 Cell Phone: (585) 729-7885 E-mail: ptrimarchi@nizonpeabody.com bcarrigan@nixonpeabody.com E) Business Organization (check appropriate category): ☐ Corporation ☐Partnership ☐ Public Corporation ☐Joint Venture ☐ Sole Proprietorship ☐Limited Liability Company Others (please specify): Year Established: 2020 State in which Organization is established: Delaware F) List all stockholders, members, or partners with % of ownership greater than 5% : Name % of ownership Source Renewables LLC 100% Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 3 Page 33 G) Applicant Business Description: Please attach a description of your company’s background, products, customers, goods and services. Estimated % of sales within Onondaga County: 100% _______________________________________ Estimated % of sales outside Onondaga County but within New York State: 100% Estimated % of sales outside New York State but within the U.S.: 0% Estimated % of sales outside the U.S.: 0% (*Percentage to equal 100%) H) What percentage of your total annual supplies, raw materials and vendor services are purchased from firms in Onondaga County. Include list of vendors, raw material suppliers and percentages for each. Provide supporting documentation including estimated percentages of local purchases. Please attach this information. I) Applicant History: If the answer to any of the following is “Yes”, please explain below. If necessary, attach additional information. 1. Is the company or management of the Company now a ☐Yes ☐No plaintiff or defendant in any civil or criminal litigation? 2. Has any person listed above ever been convicted of a criminal offense (other than a minor traffic violation)? ☐Yes ☐No 3. Has any person listed in Section I ever been in receivership or declared bankruptcy? ☐Yes ☐No Please attach any explanations: J) Has the Project Beneficiary received assistance from OCIDA, SIDA, New York State or the Onondaga Civic Development Corporation in the past? If yes please attach an explanation and please give year, project name, description of benefits and address of project. ☐Yes X ☐No Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 4 Page 34 Section II: Project Information A) Project Location: Location where the investment will take place. If company is moving, the new location should be entered here and the current location should be in Section I. Address: 6966 East Taft Rd Legal Address (if different): City: East Syracuse Village/Town: Manlius Zip Code: 13057 School District: East Syracuse Tax Map Parcel ID(s): 034.-01-20.1 Current Assessed Value: 64,900 Sq. Footage of Existing Building: 0 Census Tract: 154 B) Type (Check all that apply): ☐New construction ☐Purchase of machinery and/or equipment ☐Expansion/Addition to current facilities ☐Brownfield/Remediated Brownfield ☐Renovation of existing facility ☐LEED Certification ☐Acquisition of existing facility/property X ☐Other: ☐Demolition and Construction C) Please attach a summary of how this project will help your business grow. Will it set the company up for revenue growth? Will it mitigate cost? Will it provide more flexibility? D) Description of Project: Please provide a detailed narrative of the proposed Project. This narrative should include, but is not limited to: ☐ (i) the size of the Project in square feet and a breakdown of square footage per each intended use; ☐ (ii) the size of the lot upon which the Project sits or is to be constructed; ☐ (iii) the current use of the site and the intended use of the site upon completion of the Project; ☐ (iv) the principal products to be produced and/or the principal activities that will occur on the Project site; and ☐ (v) an indication as to why the Applicant is undertaking the Project and the need for the requested benefits. Please separately attach the description and any copies of site plans, sketches or maps. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 5 Page 35 E) Select Project Type for all end users at Project site (you may check more than one): **Please check any and all end users as identified below ☐ Industrial ☐Bank Office ☐ Acquisition of Existing Facility ☐Retail ☐ Housing ☐Mixed Use ☐ Equipment Purchase ☐Facility for Aging ☐ Multi-Tenant ☐Civic Facility (not for profit) ☐ Commercial X Other Solar Panel Array & Energy Storage ☐ F) For the Agency to consider this Project, please provide the following information: 1. Does the project consist of new construction or expansion or substantial renovation of an existing facility? X ☐Yes ☐No 2. Will the project create new employment opportunities or retain existing jobs that may otherwise be lost? ☐Yes X ☐No 3. Does the project beneficiary serve a customer base primarily outside of Onondaga County? ☐Yes ☐No X G) Will the completion of the Project result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the company from one area of the state to another area of the state OR in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the company located within the state? Please explain if you answer “Yes” by attaching a response. ☐Yes X ☐No H) Please attach a description of any compelling circumstances the Agency should be aware of while reviewing this application. I) Environmental Information 1. Please attach the appropriate Environmental Impact Forms to your application. Here is a link to the SEQR forms: a. http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html 2. Have any environmental issues been identified on the property? ☐Yes X ☐No If yes, please attach an explanation. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 6 Page 36 Section III: Construction A) Project Costs and Finances Description of Costs Total % of Total Total Private Expenditure Budget Budget to be (should be less than or Amount Procured in equal to total budget Onondaga amount) County Land Acquisition Site Work/Demo $500,000 Building Construction & Renovation 14,440,800 $4,515,600 Furniture & Fixtures Equipment Equipment Subject to NYS Production Sales Tax Engineering/Architect Financial Charges Legal $200,000 Other Management/Developer Fees Total Project Cost 15,140,800 $5,215,600 Note: Do not include OCIDA fees, OCIDA application fees or OCIDA legal fees as part of the Total Project Cost. You may attach a separate chart if needed. B) TOTAL Capital Costs $ 15,140,800 $5,215,600 Project refinancing: estimated amount (for refinancing of existing debt only) $ Sources of Funds for Project Costs: 1. Bank Financing 7,930,000 2,630,609 $ _______________ $ 4,989,300 1,127,405 2. Equity (excluding equity that is attributed to grants/tax credits) 3. Tax Exempt Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ _______________ 4. Taxable Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 7 Page 37 5. Public Sources (Include sum total of all state and federal grants $ 2,221,500 1,457,586 and tax credits) -Identify each state and federal grant/credit: NYSERDA Solar Grant $ 637,500 1,457,586 NYSERDA BESS Grant $ 1,584,000 $ $5,215,600 6. Total Sources of Funds for Project Costs 15,140,800 $ _______________ C) Employment and Payroll Information *Full Time Equivalent (FTE) is defined as one employee working no less than 40 hours per week or two or more employees together working a total of 40 hours per week. 1. Are there people currently employed at the project site? ☐Yes ☐No X If yes, provide number of FTE jobs at the facility: 2. Complete the following: See attached Estimate the number of FTE jobs to be retained as a result of this Project: Estimate the number of construction jobs to be created by this Project: 50 6 Estimate the average length of construction jobs to be created (months): Current annual payroll at facility: Average annual growth rate of wages: Please list, if any, benefits that will be available to either full and/or part time employees: Average annual benefit paid by the company ($ or % salary) per FTE job: Average growth rate of benefit cost: Amount or percent of wage employees pay for benefits: Provide an estimate of the number of residents in the Economic Development Region (Onondaga, Madison, Cayuga, Oneida, Oswego, and Cortland Counties) to fill new FTE jobs: Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 8 Page 38 D) New Employment Benefits i. Complete the following chart indicating the number of FTE jobs presently employed at the Project and the number of FTE jobs that will be created at the Project site at the end of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth years after the Project is completed. Jobs should be listed by title of category (see below), including FTE independent contractors or employees of independent contractors that work at the Project location. Do not include construction workers. ii. Feel free to include additional information or a substitute chart if you think additional material would add clarity. Current & Planned Full Salary Current Estimated Number of FTE Jobs Time Occupations (Job (Annual or Number of added each year after project Titles) Hourly) FTEs Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Service Technician $60/hr 0 1.5 Job Creation Subtotal For purposes of completing the chart, please list the job titles that will be increasing in number. If possible, please attach a brief description that outlines what each job entails. If you prefer, you may attach a job chart of your own that outlines the job growth projections regarding the project. E) Financial Assistance sought (estimated values): ☐ X Real Property Tax Abatement (PILOT): ☐ Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption (.75% of amount mortgaged): X Sales and Use Tax Exemption (4% Local, 4% State): $37,128 ☐ ☐ Tax Exempt Bond Financing (Amount Requested): ☐ Taxable Bond Financing (Amount Requested): Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 9 Page 39 F) Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption Benefit Calculator: Amount of mortgage that would be subject to mortgage recording tax: Mortgage Amount (include sum total of construction/permanent/ bridge financing): $ NA Estimated Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption Benefit (product of mortgage amount as indicated above, multiplied by .0075): $ NA G) Sales and Use Tax Benefit Calculator: Gross amount of costs for goods and services that are subject to State and local Sales and US tax – said amount to benefit from the Agency’s Sales and Use Tax exemption benefit: $ 2,124,000 $464,100 Estimated State and local Sales and Use Tax Benefit (product of 8% multiplied by the figure, above) (This should match the amount in section “E” on this page, this calculation only exists to help you with your estimate): 169,920 $$37,128 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 10 Page 40 Section IV: Estimate of Real Property Tax Abatement Benefits Section IV of this Application will be: (i) completed by IDA Staff based upon information contained within the Application, and (ii) provided to the Applicant for ultimate inclusion as part of this completed Application prior to the completed application being provided to the OCIDA Board. A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet OCIDA estimate of current value New construction and renovation costs OCIDA estimate of increase in value OCIDA estimated value of completed project OCIDA estimate of taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur Scheduled PILOT payments PILOT Exemption County Local School Total Full Tax Net Exemption Year % PILOT PILOT PILOT PILOT Payment Amount Amount Amount w/o PILOT 1 100 2 90 3 80 4 70 5 60 6 50 7 40 8 30 9 20 10 10 TOTAL Estimates provided are based on current property tax rates and assessment value (current as of date of application submission) and have been calculated by IDA staff Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 11 Page 41 Section V: Local Access Policy Agreement In absence of a waiver permitting otherwise, every project seeking the assistance of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (Agency) must use local general contractors, sub- contractors, and labor for one-hundred percent (100%) of the construction of new, expanded, or renovated facilities. The project’s construction or project manager need not be a local company. Noncompliance may result in the revocation and/or recapture of all benefits extended to the project by the Agency. Local Labor is defined as laborers permanently residing in the State of New York counties of Cayuga, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, Tompkins, and Wayne. Local (General/Sub) Contractor is defined as a contractor operating a permanent office in the State of New York counties of Cayuga, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, Tompkins and Wayne. The Agency may determine on a case-by-case basis to waive the Local Access Policy for a project or for a portion of a project where consideration of warranty issues, necessity of specialized skills, significant cost differentials between local and non-local services or other compelling circumstances exist. The procedure to address a local labor waiver can be found in the OCIDA handbook, which is available upon request. Prior to issuance of any NYS Tax & Finance ST-60 forms, the Applicant must submit a Contractor Status Report to the Agency. In consideration of the extension of financial assistance by the Agency Taft Solar Development (the Company) understands the Local Access Policy and agrees to complete Appendix C of the Agency’s application at the time of the application to the Agency and as part of a request to extend the valid date of the Agency’s tax-exempt certificate for the Project. The Company understands that an Agency tax-exempt certificate is typically valid for 12 months from the effective date of the project inducement and extended thereafter upon request by the Company. The Company further understands that any request for a waiver to this policy must be submitted in writing and approved by the Agency. I agree to the conditions of this agreement and certify all information provided regarding the construction and employment activities for the project as of 04/08/2021 (date). Company: Taft Solar LLC Representative for Contract: Andrew Day __ Address: 41545West Elm Road, Steamboat Street, Suite CCT 06830 City: Greenwich Greenwich State: CT Zip: 06830 Phone: 203-542-5651 (917) 426-0805 Email: Project Address: 6966 East Taft Rd City: East Syracuse State: NY Zip: 13057 General Contractor: None at this time. Contact Person: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Email: Authorized Representative: Andrew Robert Day Title: Manager Signature: Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 12 Page 42 Section VI: Agency Fee Schedule Payment Terms: Application & Processing Fee (payable at the time of application): $1,000 Legal Deposit (payable at the time of application): $2,500 Agency Fee for Bond Projects: Payable at Closing Agency and Legal Fees for all other projects: Due and Payable at Inducement * A sales tax certificate (ST-60) will not be issued until the Agency Fee is Paid in Full Agency Fees: The project cost is the Total Project Cost from section III A Benefit Sought Fee Charged Mortgage Recording Tax and/or Sales Tax exemptions: 0.01 X the project cost Additional Fee for PILOT Agreement Projects: 0.0025 X the project cost Fee for bond financing, refinancing & refunding: 0.0025 X the project cost Note: For Manufacturing Projects under $10 million the fee is reduced by: 0.0025 X the project cost Agency Legal Fees: The project cost is the Total Project Cost from section III A Fee for first $20 million: 0.0025 of the project cost Fee for expenses above $20 million: 0.00125 of the project cost In addition to the foregoing, Applicants are responsible for payment of all costs and expenses incurred by OCIDA in connection with application or Project including without limitation publication, copying costs, SEQRA compliance and fees and costs to OCIDA’s attorneys, engineers, and consultants. OCIDA reserves the right to require a deposit to cover anticipated costs. Application fees are payable at time application/request is submitted. All fees are non-refundable. Applicants for bond transactions are responsible for payment of a Bond Issuance Charge payable to the State of New York. Applicants are also responsible for payment of post-closing fees and costs associated with the appointment of additional agents. OCIDA reserves the right to modify this schedule at any time and assess fees and charges in connection with other transactions such as grants of easement or lease or sale of OCIDA-owned property. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 13 Page 43 Section VII: Recapture of Tax Abatement/Exemptions Information to be Provided by Companies: Each Company agrees that to receive benefits from the Agency it must, whenever requested by the Agency or required under applicable statutes or project documents, provide and certify or cause to be provided and certified such information concerning the Company, its finances, its employees and other topics which shall, from time to time, be necessary or appropriate, including but not limited to, such information as to enable the Agency to make any reports required by law or governmental regulation. Recapture of Benefits: It is the policy of the Agency to recapture the value of a PILOT, any sales and use tax exemption, and mortgage recording tax exemption in accordance with the Laws of the State and the provisions contained herein. Before receiving benefits, the Company must attest in writing to its understanding of, and agreement to, the recapture provisions contained in State Law and herein. To the extent permitted by State law, the recapture provisions contained herein may be modified from time to time by the Agency at its sole discretion. Recapture of a PILOT, Sales Tax and the Mortgage Recording Tax Exemptions: If the number of full time equivalent jobs to be maintained or created in connection with a project falls below 75% of the number projected in the Company’s application to the Agency, or if there are material violations of the project agreements, then the value of the property tax, sales and use tax and mortgage recording tax benefits extended to the project by the Agency may be subject to recapture. When deciding whether or not to recapture benefits and the amount of such recapture, the Agency may consider the potential future benefit of the business to the community. Recapture Payment: The recapture payment paid by the Company to the Agency shall be determined (1) by the difference between any PILOT payments made by the Company and the property taxes that would have been paid by the Company if the property were not under the supervision, jurisdiction or control of the Agency, (2) the value of any mortgage recording tax exemption, if awarded to the Company and (3) the amount of sales and use tax that would have been paid if an exemption was not granted. Recapture of the PILOT, Sales Tax or Mortgage Recording Tax: The Recapture Schedule for a Payment in Lieu of Tax Agreement, Sales Tax or the Mortgage Recording Tax is as follows: Time from Project Completion Tax Savings Recaptured 1 Year 80% 2 Years 60% 3 Years 40% 4 Years 20% 5 Years 10% Distribution of the Recapture Payment: Any funds recaptured as a result of the recapture payment shall be distributed to the affected taxing jurisdictions in the same proportion as if the payments were paid or owed by the Company on the date of recapture. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 14 Page 44 Additional Conditions for the Recapture of Sales and Use Tax: As of April 1, 2013, New York State law requires Industrial Development Agencies to recapture sales tax benefits where:  A project is not entitled to receive the benefits:  Exemptions received exceed the amount authorized by the Agency;  Exemptions are claimed by the Project for unauthorized property or services; or  A project fails to use property in the manner required by its IDA agreements. 1. Distribution of Sales and Use Tax. Project operators must cooperate with the Agency in its effort to recapture all sales and use tax benefits received by the Company by promptly paying the recapture amount as determined by the Agency. The amount to be recaptured will be dictated by State Law or this UTEP Policy, which ever may be applicable. The Agency shall remit the recaptured sales and use tax benefits to the State within 30 days of receipt. 2. Compliance Report. Annually, the Agency will file an annual compliance report with the State of New York detailing its recapture terms and its activities to recapture benefits, including any attempt to recapture benefits from an Agency project. A “Full Time Permanent Employee” shall mean 1. A full time, permanent, private sector employee on the Company’s payroll, who has worked at the project location for a minimum of thirty hours per week for not less than four consecutive weeks and who is entitled to receive the usual and customary fringe benefits extended by Company to other employees with comparable rank, duties and hours; or 2. Up to three part time, permanent, private-sector employees on Company’s payroll, who have worked at the project location for a combined minimum of thirty hours per week for not less than four consecutive weeks and who are entitled to receive the usual and customary fringe benefits extended by Company to other employees with comparable rank, duties and hours. I have read the foregoing and agree to comply with all the terms and conditions contained therein as well as policies of the Onondaga County Industrial Agency. Name of Applicant Company Taft Solar LLC _________________________________ Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Andrew Day, Member Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ 04/08/2021 Date: ______________ Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 15 Page 45 Section VIII: Employment Plan Jobs Listings: In accordance with §858-b(2) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any Financial Assistance from the Agency, except as otherwise provided by collective bargaining agreements, new employment opportunities created as a result of the Project will be listed with the New York State Department of Labor Business Services and with the administrative entity of the service delivery area created by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014 in which the Project is located. In Onondaga County, please contact CNY Works. Additionally, the applicant is encouraged to review the services provided by JOBSPlus! for candidate matching services. Are the employees of your company currently covered by a collective bargaining agreement? ☐Yes X ☐No If yes, name and location: Is the labor pool in Onondaga County and/or the CNY Economic Development Region adequate to fill new positions? ☐Yes X ☐No Enter Company Name in three (3) places below and sign by an authorized company officer: In consideration of the benefits provided by the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (OCIDA), Taft Solar LLC , project beneficiary, also agrees to report to OCIDA on the number of new employment opportunities created in connection with industrial or commercial projects financed by the proceeds of such benefits to be listed with the New York State Department of Labor Business Services and CNY Works. Taft Solar LLC , project beneficiary, also agrees to report to OCIDA on or before March 1 of each year the status of employment opportunities filed with the New York State Department of Labor Business Services, including the number of new employment opportunities created, the number listed, and the number filled for the year ending the prior December 31. Taft Solar LLC , project beneficiary, further agrees that, to the extent practicable and feasible, and subject to the requirements of any existing collective bargaining agreement, the project beneficiary shall fill at least 10% of new employment opportunities with persons eligible for service under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014. Name of Applicant Company: Taft Solar LLC ______________________________________________________ Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: ______________________________________ Andrew Day, Member Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: ___________________________________ Date: 04/08/2021 ______________ 2/5/2020 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 16 Page 46 NYS Department of Labor: Roy Jewell Associate Business Service Representative 450 South Salina Street, Syracuse, NY 13202 315-479-3362 roy.jewell@labor.ny.gov www.labor.ny.gov CNY Works Chris Kennedy Business Development Specialist 960 James Street, Syracuse, NY 13203 315-477-6974 ckennedy@cnyworks.com www.cnyworks.com Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 17 Page 47 Section IX: Conflict of Interest Agency Board Members 1. Patrick Hogan 2. Steve Morgan 3. Victor Ianno 4. Sue Stanczyk 5. Kevin Ryan 6. Janice Herzog 7. Fanny Villarreal Agency Officers/Staff 1. Robert M. Petrovich 2. Nathaniel Stevens 3. Genevieve A. Suits 4. Karen Doster 5. Chris Cox Agency Legal Counsel & Auditor 1. Anthony Rivizzigno, Esq., Barclay Damon LLP 2. Amanda Mirabito, Esq., Barclay Damon LLP 3. Michael G. Lisson, CPA, Grossman St. Amour Certified Public Accountants PLLC The Applicant has received from the Agency a list of members, officers and staff of the Agency. To the best of my knowledge, no member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect, in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described: Name of Applicant Company Taft Solar LLC _________________________________ Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: Andrew Day, Member _________________________________ Date: ______________ 2/5/2020 04/08/2021 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 18 Page 48 Section X: Representations, Certifications, and Indemnification Andrew Day (Name of CEO or other authorized representative of Member Applicant) confirms and says that he/she is the ____________________ (title) of Taft Solar LLC ____________________ (name of corporation or other entity) named in the attached Application (the “Applicant”), that he/she has read the foregoing Application and knows the contents thereof, and hereby represents, understands, and otherwise agrees with the Agency and as follows: A. First Consideration for Employment: In accordance with §858-b (2) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any Financial Assistance from the Agency, except as otherwise provided by collective bargaining agreements, where practicable, the Applicant will first consider persons eligible to participate in WIA programs who shall be referred by the CNY Works for new employment opportunities created as a result of the Project. B. Other NYS Facilities: In accordance with §862 (1) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that projects which will result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant within the state is ineligible for Agency Financial Assistance, unless otherwise approved by the Agency as reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project in its respective industry or is reasonably necessary. C. Annual Sales Tax Filings: In accordance with §874(8) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any sales tax exemptions as part of the Financial Assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file, or cause to be filed, with the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, the annual form prescribed by the Department of Taxation and Finance, describing the value of all sales tax exemptions claimed by the Applicant and all consultants or subcontractors retained by the Applicant. D. Outstanding Bonds: The Applicant understands and agrees to provide on an annual basis any information regarding bonds, if any, issued by the Agency for the project that is requested by the Comptroller of the State of New York. E. Employment Reports: The Applicant understands and agrees that, if the Project receives any financial assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file with the Agency, at least annually or as otherwise required by the Agency, reports regarding the number of people employed at the project site, salary levels, contractor utilization and such other information (collectively, “Employment Reports”) that may be required from time to time on such appropriate forms as designated by the Agency. Failure to provide Employment Reports within 30 days of an Agency request shall be an Event of Default under the PILOT Agreement between the Agency and Applicant and, if applicable, an Event of Default under the Agent Agreement between the Agency and Applicant. In addition, a Notice of Failure to provide the Agency with an Employment Report may be reported to Agency board members, with said report being an agenda item subject to the open Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 19 Page 49 meetings law. F. Absence of Conflicts of Interest: The Applicant has received from the Agency a list of the members, officers and employees of the Agency. No member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described in Section X. G. Compliance: The Applicant understands and agrees that it is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection, and environmental laws, rules, and regulations. H. The Applicant understands and agrees that the provisions of Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law, as provided below, will not be violated if financial assistance is provided for the proposed Project: § 862. Restrictions on funds of the Agency. (1) No funds of the Agency shall be used in respect of any project if the completion thereof would result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant located within the state, provided, however, that neither restriction shall apply if the agency shall determine on the basis of the application before it that the project is reasonably necessary to discourage the project occupant from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the state or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project occupant in its respective industry. I. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the owner, occupant or operator receiving financial assistance for the proposed Project is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection and environmental laws, rules and regulations. J. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the submission of any knowingly false or knowingly misleading information may lead to the immediate termination of any financial assistance and the reimbursement of an amount equal to all or part of any tax exemption claimed by reason of the Agency’s involvement in the Project. K. The Applicant confirms and hereby acknowledges that as of the date of this Application, the Applicant is in substantial compliance with all provisions of Article 18-A of the New York General Municipal Law, including, but not limited to, the provision of Section 859- a and Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law. L. The Applicant and the individual executing this Application on behalf of Applicant acknowledge that the Agency and its counsel will rely on the representations and covenants made in this Application when acting hereon and hereby represents that the statements made herein do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact and do not omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement contained herein not misleading. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 20 Page 50 M. The OCIDA has the right to request and inspect supporting documentation regarding attestations made on this application. N. Hold Harmless Agreement: Applicant hereby releases Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency and the members, officers, servants, agents and employees thereof (the "Agency") from, agrees that the Agency shall not be liable for, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Agency harmless from and against any and all liability arising from or expense incurred by: (A) the Agency's examination and processing of, and action pursuant to or upon, the attached Application, regardless of whether or not the Application or the Project described therein or the tax-exemptions and other assistance requested therein are favorably acted upon by the Agency; (B) the Agency's acquisition, construction, and/or installation of the Project described therein and (C) any further action taken by the Agency with respect to the Project, including without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all cause of action and attorney's fees and any other expenses incurred in defending any suits or action which may arise as a result of any of the foregoing. If, for any reason, the Applicant fails to conclude or consummate necessary negotiations, or fails, within a reasonable or specified period of time, to take reasonable, proper or requested action, or withdraws, abandons, cancels or neglects the Application, or if the Agency or the Applicant are unable to reach final agreement with respect to the Project, then, and in the event, upon presentation of an invoice itemizing the same, the Applicant shall pay to the Agency, its agents or assigns, all costs incurred by the Agency in the process of the Application, including attorney's fees, if any. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 21 Page 51 Name of Applicant Company _______________________________________ Taft Solar LLC Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Andrew Day, Member 04/08/2021 Date: ______________ STATE OF NEW YORK Florida ) COUNTY OF ONONDAGA Leon )ss.; Andrew Robert Day , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. That I am the Manager (Corporate Officer) of Taft Solar, LLC (Applicant) and that I am duly authorized on behalf of the Applicant to bind the Applicant. 2. That I have read and attached Application, I Know the contents thereof, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, this Application and the contents of this Application are true, accurate and complete (Signature of Officer) Subscribed and affirmed to me under penalties of perjury this 04/08/2021 day of , 20 . Online Notary (Notary Public) Notarized online using audio-video communication End of Application Rev 1-9-20 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 22 Page 52 90°' 90°' © 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS © 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS © 2020 HERE T-100 Page 53 R/W X X X X X X X X 90°' 90° ' © 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS © 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 HERE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE 90 °' 5 · · · · · · · · · · C-100 Page 54 R/W X X X X X X X X 90°' 90° ' © 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS © 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 HERE 45' TYPICAL POLE SPACING 20 FOOT WIDE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE 90 °' 5 · · · · · · · · · · Rochester, NY 14614 labellapc.com 585-454-6110 300 State Street, Suite 201 C-200 Page 55 R 27 59 50N M 81O 59N 51V 51N 51V R M M 300 State Street, Suite 201 Rochester, NY 14614 585-454-6110 labellapc.com DISCONNECT DISCONNECT FUSE FUSE A B C A B C A B C A B C E-100 Page 56 VFI CT CT CT PT's CPT M - - - M - - - - - - BATTERY UTILITY RELAY BACKUP 300 State Street, Suite 201 Rochester, NY 14614 585-454-6110 labellapc.com H0 H0 X0 X0 A B C A B C A B C A B C - - + + - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + + E-110 Page 57 D-100 Page 58 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Application for Benefits Attachments Section 1, G) Description of your company’s background, products, customers, goods and services Taft Solar Development LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Source Renewables. Source Renewables LLC is a clean energy development company focused on the development of Solar PV, Energy Storage, and Hybrid Solar/Storage projects in the Americas. Source Renewables was formed by Source Structured Finance and ABA Clean Energy as a means to merge two energy development companies and provide a stronger unified value proposition to asset managers, customers, and the project development community. The Source Renewables team has deep experience in the energy and project finance markets, having developed and built more than 60MW’s of distributed Solar and Energy Storage. In addition to its already executed projects Source Renewables has a pipeline of over 300MW in various stages of development in the US. We currently have multiple projects in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York. For more information on the company please visit http://sourcerenew.com/ H) Percentage of total annual supplies, raw materials, and vendor services purchased from firms in Onondaga County. Taft Solar LLC does not have current vendors, suppliers, and contactors assigned to the project. We will make every effort to use local sources when feasible. Supplies specific to solar arrays are generally not available on a local level, however for general supplies, equipment and sub-contractors, we are committed to using local sources. I) NA J) Assistance form OCIDA, SIDA, NYS or OCDC Page 59 The project beneficiary has not yet received assistance, but wishes to disclose they are in the process of applying for the NY SUN NYSERDA solar grant and the NYSRDA energy storage grant. No other assistance has been received, or is planned to be requested, from named entities in the application. Page 60 Section II, C) Summary of how this project will help your business grow. Taft Solar Development, LLC has chosen this location as a target location for a photovoltaic solar facility. This solar plant, built at 6966 East Taft Rd. will increase Source Renewables overall power production capacity and reach, by providing residents the ability to obtain access to solar-generated electrical power. D) Description of Project Taft Solar Development, proposes to build a Community Distributed Generation photovoltaic (PV) solar facilities (“Solar Facility”) under New York State’s Community Solar initiative. Said Solar Facility is planned to have a nameplate capacity of approximately 3.7 megawatts (MW) alternating current (AC). The solar facility will be situated on approximately 20 acres of private land, on an approximate 35 acre area, owned by Taft Solar Development, LLC (the “Facility Site”) which is currently sitting as vacant land. Source Renewables is requesting PILOT and a Sales and Use Exemption for the project because the project is not financially feasible without the funding. Additionally, with support from the agency, these supports will allow Taft Solar Development to offer local residents lower rates for electricity. H) Compelling Circumstances In addition to the descriptions provided in this application, I would like to submit this attachment outlining the unique benefits of community solar projects. Solar arrays, utilized for community solar, provide significant benefits for the environment and the community in which they are located. Solar projects generate clean renewable energy that feeds the local utility grid. Through monetary crediting, that energy can be shared with customers in the same utility service area. Savings show up directly on their utility bill, in the form of dollar-value credits for up to 25 years. Section III, Part C and D Employment Information Page 61 Taft Solar LLC will hire 3rd party contractors, preferably from the local area, to preform annual maintenance and inspection for the solar array. This work would support three individuals from the selected contractor firm for a total of 1000 hours per year each. The 2020 market rate for this contract work is $60 per hour with a reasonable increase per year to maintain market rate. This employment is expected to continue through the pilot agreement and beyond. Section V, Local access policy agreement Due to the complexity and specificity of Solar Array installation we, (Taft Solar LLC) will need to utilize a general contractor for the work involved. We will encourage, to the best of our ability, for sub- contractors and labor to be hired from the local pool. We hope to convey our appreciation and agreeance for the need to employ as many local laborers and businesses as possible, in the construction of this array. Page 62 Draft Project Summary 4/7/2021 1. Project UR-Ban Villages PFA, LLC 2. Project Number 3101-21-07A 3. Location Salina 4. School District Liverpool Central School District Demolition, Construction , Renovation and addition to 6. Project Type current facilities 5. Tax Parcel(s) 086.-01-15.2 Village - 7.Total Project Cost $ 15,544,899.00 8. Total Jobs 8 Land $ 1,000,000 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ 2,054,755 8B: Job Creation 8 Building $ 11,460,144 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ 350,000 Equipment Subject to NYS Production Exemption $ - Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 680,000 Financial Charges $ - Legal Fees $ - Other $ - Cost Benefit Analysis UR-Ban Villages PFA, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Estimated Abatement Cost $2,369,054 Sales Tax Abatement $1,163,592 Mortgage Recording Tax Abatement $116,587 Real Property Tax Relief $1,088,875 New Investment $36,541,397 PILOT Payments $1,089,186 Project Wages (10 years) $3,330,000 UR-Ban Villages PFA, LLC is proposing to redevelop the 13 acre site at 100 Buckley Road. This Construction Wages $17,412,000 summary sheet and corresponding PILOT schedule only applies to Phase 1. Phase 1 is 88 units. Employee Benefits (10 years) $0 Project Capital Investment $14,514,899 Agency Fees $195,311 Benefit:Cost Ratio 15.42 :1 Page 63 Draft Ur-ban Villages PFA, LLC PILOT 4/7/2021 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet for 10 years OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 326,700 Projected investment $ 11,460,144 OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 4,840,000 OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 5,166,700 Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 137,723 Scheduled PILOT payments $ 1,089,186 Liverpool Full Tax Onondaga Central Net PILOT YEAR Exemption % Salina Total PILOT Payment w/o County School Exemption PILOT District 1 100% $ 1,725 $ 1,719 $ 9,133 $ 12,578 $ 198,915 $ 186,337 2 90% $ 4,367 $ 4,352 $ 23,117 $ 31,836 $ 202,893 $ 171,057 3 80% $ 7,113 $ 7,090 $ 37,656 $ 51,859 $ 206,951 $ 155,092 4 70% $ 9,968 $ 9,935 $ 52,768 $ 72,670 $ 211,090 $ 138,420 5 60% $ 12,934 $ 12,891 $ 68,469 $ 94,293 $ 215,312 $ 121,018 6 50% $ 16,014 $ 15,961 $ 84,777 $ 116,752 $ 219,618 $ 102,866 7 40% $ 19,213 $ 19,149 $ 101,710 $ 140,072 $ 224,010 $ 83,938 8 30% $ 22,533 $ 22,458 $ 119,286 $ 164,278 $ 228,491 $ 64,213 9 20% $ 25,978 $ 25,892 $ 137,525 $ 189,396 $ 233,060 $ 43,665 10 10% $ 29,552 $ 29,454 $ 156,446 $ 215,453 $ 237,722 $ 22,269 TOTAL $ 149,398 $ 148,901 $ 790,888 $ 1,089,186 $ 2,178,061 $ 1,088,875 Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Jobs Current/Actuals 0 Creation Goals 3 4 1 0 Total Employment Goals 0 3 7 8 8 8 Page 64 Urban Villages Vision Statement February 18, 2021 Dear Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency, Introduction: We respectfully request your consideration of our application for a 10 - year PILOT in addition to mortgage recording and sales and use exemptions to assist in the proposed Phase 1 redevelopment of 100 Buckley Road in Liverpool, NY. This redevelopment will include environmental clean-up, site improvements, as well as renovations to the existing buildings to develop the site as a mixed development. Phase 1 includes the renovations to four buildings to include roughly 88 residential units, as well as site cleanup. Upon completion of the entire project 100 Buckley Road will be home warehouse space, rooftop restaurant, brewery and over 225 residential units. The Pascarella Family, members of UR-ban Villages PFA, LLC and owners of a local construction and development company, as well as over 40 properties in and around the City of Syracuse, are very familiar with the site and its past. Their expertise in construction and property management would serve as a seamless fit to convert the vacant site. Their plan would be to transform the grounds from a factory to a live-in community. To restore and re-purpose the grounds along with every building on site, preserving the organic nature of its growth, and all the pieces of its past. Wrapping it with new life both inside and out. Their plan will be to transform the site into a community, into a village, an Urban Village. Please see the below information which outlines our request: 1. Is the project being built in a blighted area? Yes. a. This parcel has sat largely vacant and underutilized for nearly three decades. The property has fallen into significant disrepair. b. The buildings have suffered significant structural damage. c. The property is highly visible from the Hiawatha Blvd Bridge off 81 Northbound and is a blight. 2. Is the housing fulfilling an unmet need in the area? Yes a. Redevelopment of a local landmark site. Page 65 b. Close proximity to the Village of Liverpool and City of Syracuse. c. Upon completion will provide significant improvements to CNY’s housing stock with the provision of brand-new mixed-use apartment buildings, with some units having balconies to enjoy the view of Onondaga Lake. d. Provides an attractive live and play environment for workers from high tech companies including the new Amazon fulfilment center in Clay. e. With close proximity to the Onondaga Lake Parkway the site plans to create a connection to the trail. f. Close proximity and connection to the Village of Liverpool, sit e improvements will enhance walkability. 3. Is there a market study documenting for such housing? Onondaga County is underserved with this type of housing development/community. Urban Villages will provide its residents amenities attracting all age groups including millennials; amenities will include, covered and/or indoor parking,in unit washer and dryer, gym, elevators, custom kitchen with high end fixtures include soft close cabinetry, balconies, walking trails, onsite eateries,and closeness to essential businesses. a. While unit floorplans are not complete the project plans to include handicap accessible units. b. Fills a gap of new apartments between the abundance in Downtown Syracuse and suburban Liverpool area. 4. Is there support from local officials? a. Support of Colleen A. Gunnip (Town Supervisor) b. David M. Carnie (4th ward Town of Salina Councilor) c. National Grid Economic Development program 5. Does the project provide walkability to municipal centers? Yes a. While final site plans have not been submitted, the redevelopment includes sidewalks and a connection to the Onondaga Park trail system as well as onsite green space for recreation. Page 66 6. Is any additional county providing infrastructure necessary to service the project? No, none is needed. In closing, UR-Ban Villages PFA, LLC is eager and excited to redevelop this site, bringing it back to a useful purpose and add to the fabric of Central New York. We ask that OCIDA provides support and acceptance of our application so that we can move forward with the redevelopment and improve our community. Sincerely, Vittorio Pascarella Member Page 67 Proposed Redevelopment of 100 Buckley Road Urban Villages PFA, LLC is seeking assistance from the Onondaga County Industrial Development agency to redevelop the former Will & Baumer Candle Factory, located at 100 Buckley Road in Liverpool, NY. The proposed redevelopment would address this blighted 11.5 acre property located at one of the main arteries in the Town of Salina and visible from the Hiawatha Blvd Bridge off 81 Northbound. This site has been sitting largely vacant for almost 3 decades now. It wasn’t always this way. At its height, the now desolate grounds were once beaming with life and activity. The company, founded by a German Immigrant Carpenter named Anton Will, began in the basement of his own personal home. They specialized primarily in the production of handmade religious candles. Over time, demand grew, and they eventually moved into a factory on Alvord Street. This was right around the time the Baumer name was added in the late 1880s. In 1910, growing success finally brought them to their final resting place at the crossroads of Old Liverpool, and Buckley Road. As the business grew, the factory grew, and the volume of buildings grew, organically and over time. The Site had many years of great success and has been staple in the Town of Salina ever since. Though in the ladder years, not for good reason. The Pascarella Family, owners of a local construction and development company, as well as over 40 properties in and around the City of Syracuse, are very familiar with the site and its past. Like all residents of the Town and City, they drive by the site almost daily. For much of their lives, they’d hoped for someone or something to come along and bring the site back to life. However, it wasn’t until recently, and after the last failed attempt to restart the old candle company, that opportunity arrived… right at their doorstep. They noticed a newly dispatched for sale sign posted afront that original and iconic first brick building constructed in 1910, and decided it was time to intervene. Their expertise in construction and property management would serve as a seamless fit to convert the vacant site. Their plan would be to transform the grounds from a factory to a live-in community. To restore and re-purpose the grounds along with every building on site, preserving the organic nature of its growth, and all the pieces of its past. Wrapping it with new life both inside and out. Their plan will be to transform the site into a community, into a village, an UR-ban Village. Due to the size of the project, Urban has divided this project into three phases that will take place over five years and is requesting assistance at this time from OCIDA for Phase 1 of the project. The first phase of the project calls an investment of roughly $15 million, this includes; $1 million for acquisition of the site, roughly $2 million for site work and demolition which includes 1 million dollar environmental cleanup. One pressing concern is the repair damage to building 1 caused by the freezing and thaw Page 68 cycle of the roof drains that blew out a corner wall, causi ng structural damage to the building. The budget calls for roughly $11.5 million for building construction and renovations, $350,000 for equipment and $680,000 for engineering and architecture fees. Upon completion the first phase will bring online 88 resi dential units consisting of 1- and 2-bedroom units varying in square footage from 510 sf to 1,560 SF. While the exact floor plans and makeup of each apartment hasn’t been set in stone, Urban is hoping to have a cross section of various layouts and sizes as well as handicap accessible units so that the residences are attractive to a cross section of tenants, including empty nesters, millennials, and many other generations. Firm layouts cannot be finalized until after the building structure has been secured and cleaned out, so the square footages may vary a little. Overall Project Plan Once plans have been approved by the Town, Urban Villages PFA plans to redevelop the site as a mixed development with warehouse space, rooftop restaurant, brewery and residential units. The project consists of a total of eleven buildings that will be redeveloped, consisting of roughly 179,000 square feet. The project proposes the construction of over 200 residential apartments. The proposed plan also includes the redevelopment of roughly 37,000 SF commercial tenant space, 6,000 SF will be used for a leasing office and mechanical/maintenance room. Indoor parking will be available for residents. Urban Villages PFA is eager and excited to redevelop this site, bringing it back to a useful purpose and add to the fabric of Central New York. Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Urban Villages BREAKDOWN of Units by BUILDING Building 1 Building 2 Building 3A Building 3B Building 4a Building 4b Building 4c Building 5 Building 6 Building 7 Building 8 Building N1 Building N2 Est Construction $2,235,460.00 4,092,428.00 2,369,518.00 2,762,738.00 Anticipated (ft²) Anticipated (ft²) Anticipated (ft²) Anticipated (ft²) Anticipated (ft²) Anticipated (ft²) Anticipated (ft²) Anticipated (ft²) Anticipated (ft²) Finished (ft²) 22,432 43,807 15,191 17,413 0 26,656 5,722 56,570 6,715 6,500 6,500 40,000 40,000 Unfinished (ft²)** 7,558 12,844 12,929 17,413 16,500 9,730 2,901 27,245 1 Bedrooms 18 25 9 20 Average ft² 855 831 859 691 FINAL SIZE FINAL SIZE FINAL SIZE FINAL SIZE FINAL SIZE FINAL SIZE FINAL SIZE FINAL SIZE FINAL SIZE Max ft² 1,080 1,008 1,560 855 & & & & & & & & & Min ft² (Studio) 545 510 616 616 FINAL SCOPE FINAL SCOPE FINAL SCOPE FINAL SCOPE FINAL SCOPE FINAL SCOPE FINAL SCOPE FINAL SCOPE FINAL SCOPE 2 Bedrooms 3 10 3 0 YET YET YET YET YET YET YET YET YET Average ft² 1,272 1,174 650 -- TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO Max ft² 1,299 1,301 667 0 BE BE BE BE BE BE BE BE BE Min ft² 1,223 1,113 616 0 DETERMINED DETERMINED DETERMINED DETERMINED DETERMINED DETERMINED DETERMINED DETERMINED DETERMINED Loft / Commercial* 11 0 0 Average ft² 343 -- -- Max ft² 621 0 0 Min ft² 286 0 0 Total(s) Units 21 35 12 20 INTENDED INTENDED INTENDED INTENDED INTENDED INTENDED INTENDED INTENDED INTENDED Average ft² 915 929 807 691 USE USE USE USE USE USE USE USE USE Primary Usage Apartments Apartments Apartments Apartments Parking Apartments Apartments Apartments Common Brewery Parking Mixed Use Apartments Phase 1 Phase 1 Phase 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 2 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 3 *Not Included In Total Unit Counts **Typically Indicates Indoor or Covered Parking Page 90 UR FEASIBILITY REPORT 100 BUCKLEY ROAD, TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK 13088 BROUGHT TO YOU BY: Page 91 the Urban WILL Villages & BAUMER LUXURY LOFTS 100 BUCKLEY ROAD, TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Calocerinos Engineering, PLLC P.O. Box 2187 Syracuse, New York 13220 Phone: (315)214-5861 Fax: (315)214-5904 C A L O CE N R VE IN STE OS PROJECT LOCATION ELEV. 380.20 33'R X PHASE 1 47'± 24'-0" 24 BUILDING 3A PHASE 2 Urban VILLAGES 28 100 Buckley Road 33'R 21 74'± Liverpool, New York 13088 PROPOSED Tax Parcel ID #086.-01-15.2 PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT BUILDING 3B BUILDING 1 1 BR 840 SF 1,287 SF 954 SF For: 1BR 2BR 24 1 BR BUILDING 2 PROPOSED 930 SF 13 PHASE 3 14 DEVELOPMENT 1 BR 1,274 SF 831 SF Urban Villages PFA, LLC 2BR 1BR 930 SF COMMON 1 BR 25' 925 Seventh North Street 930 SF BUILDING 4B 913 SF Liverpool, New York 13088 COMMON 1,274 SF 831 SF 1BR 1 BR 930 SF 9 20' 8 BUILDING 4A 35 1 BR BUILDING 5 930 SF 1,287 SF 840 SF 2BR 1BR 22 4' BUILDING 6 90 PROPOSED N 3 1 BR G1 PHASE 2 DEVELOPMENT 800 SF DIN 7 1 BR BU IL 800 SF BUILDING 4C NEW 8 1 BR 7 5 800 SF 24 BUILDING 8 1 BR 8 20 800 SF Town of Salina, 1 BR 11 800 SF 14 14 Onondaga County, New York 7 1 BR 10 BUILDING 7 879 SF 14 10 PROPOSED PHASE 3 12 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT 24 § 1S ILDING MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 10 10 PROPOSED PROPOSED REVISIONS NEW BU 13 PHASE 2 COMPACTOR AND 12 PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT 11 PROPOSED PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES PROJECT NO: DATE: DRAWN BY: 5 5 DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: NO ALTERATION PERMITTED HERON EXCEPT AS PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 7209 SUBDIVISION 2 18 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 BUILDING 1 2 3D View 2 SCALE: ISSUED FOR: 1 3D View 1 It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, 6/24/2020 10:16:08 AM professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. SCALE: DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: EXISTING 3D VIEWS ML 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages EXG 3D 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK Page 98 19'-0" 41'-4 1/4" BUILDING 1 APARTMENT UNITS: 14 PARKING: 1BR 21'-3 7/8" 953 SF OUTDOOR PARKING: 14 1BR UNDERGROUND PARKING: 14 37'-4" 858 SF PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR 1BR 21'-0 1/4" LEVEL UNIT TYPE AREA INDOOR PAKRING 641 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN CIR 561 SF 7558 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 953 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 641 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN STAIR 371 SF STAIR 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 726 SF 12'-2 1/4" 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 1080 SF 371 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 858 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 2BR 1299 SF 41'-0" 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 1069 SF CIR Grand total: 9 7558 SF 561 SF 1BR 1BR 23'-9 3/4" 726 SF 1080 SF 6'-0" 2BR 1BR 41'-8 3/8" 35'-8 3/8" 1299 SF 1069 SF 30'-4 7/8" 29'-11 3/8" 1 BASEMENT PLAN 2 1ST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: 6/24/2020 10:14:57 AM professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED PLAN DIAGRAM ML 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages A1.0 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK Page 99 19'-0" 41'-4 1/4" 19'-0" 41'-3 1/4" BUILDING 1 2ND FLOOR LEVEL UNIT TYPE AREA 21'-5 1/4" 21'-5 1/4" 1BR 1BR 2ND FLOOR 1BR 956 SF 958 SF 958 SF 2ND FLOOR 2BR 1293 SF 1BR 1BR 2ND FLOOR 1BR 1053 SF 37'-4" 41'-9 3/4" 2ND FLOOR 1BR 623 SF 956 SF 781 SF 2ND FLOOR STAIR 354 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 545 SF 2ND FLOOR CIR 815 SF 20'-4 1/2" 20'-4 1/2" 1BR 2ND FLOOR 1BR 958 SF 1BR/CY 2ND FLOOR 1BR 960 SF 545 SF 623 SF Grand total: 9 7558 SF STAIR STAIR 13'-3" 13'-3" 354 SF 259 SF 1BR CIR PROPOSED ATTIC FLOOR 1BR 41'-0" 36'-6 3/8" 964 SF 860 SF LEVEL UNIT TYPE AREA 960 SF CIR ATTIC FLOOR 1BR 781 SF 1BR 23'-3 3/8" 815 SF 1BR/CY ATTIC FLOOR 1BR 958 SF 22'-9" ATTIC FLOOR 1BR 964 SF 623 SF 596 SF ATTIC FLOOR 2BR 1223 SF ATTIC FLOOR 1BR 1053 SF ATTIC FLOOR CIR 860 SF ATTIC FLOOR STAIR 259 SF 7'-0 3/4" 6'-6 3/8" ATTIC FLOOR 1BR/CY 596 SF ATTIC FLOOR 1BR/CY 623 SF Grand total: 9 7316 SF 2BR 1BR 2BR 1BR 41'-8 3/8" 41'-8 3/8" 1293 SF 1053 SF 1223 SF 1053 SF 35'-2" 35'-2" 30'-4 7/8" 29'-11 3/8" 30'-4 7/8" 29'-11 3/8" It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: 6/24/2020 10:14:59 AM professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is 1 2ND FLOOR 2 ATTIC FLOOR altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED PLAN DIAGRAM Author 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages A1.1 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK BUILDING 2 1 PROPOSED 3D VIEW SCALE: It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is ISSUED FOR: 6/30/2020 1:47:43 PM altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED 3D Author 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages SD1.3 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK BUILDING 2 1 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is 6/30/2020 1:47:39 PM altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED ELEVATION Author 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages SD1.1 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK Page 102 BUILDING 2 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is 6/30/2020 1:47:37 PM altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED ELEVATION Author 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages SD1.0 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK Page 103 BUILDING 2 167'-6 1/2" PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR UNIT LEVEL TYPE AREA 24'-5" 22'-7 7/8" 24'-8 1/2" 24'-1 1/8" 24'-10 1/8" 23'-2 1/2" 23'-7 3/8" 1ST FLOOR PLAN STAIR 510 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 875 SF 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 812 SF 39'-2 3/4" 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 885 SF 875 SF 812 SF 885 SF 863 SF 890 SF 832 SF 846 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 863 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 890 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 832 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 846 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 2BR 1124 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 2BR 1113 SF CIR 6'-0" STAIR 1ST FLOOR PLAN STAIR 255 SF 82'-0" 1041 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN ELV 86 SF 16'-0" 144 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 2BR 1301 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 2BR 1121 SF CIR 1ST FLOOR PLAN CIR 1041 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN CIR 246 SF 34'-5 1/4" 246 SF 2BR 2BR 2BR 9'-0" 1ST FLOOR PLAN CY 1384 SF STAIR 2BR STAIR 1301 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN STAIR 144 SF 1124 SF 1121 SF Grand total: 18 14327 SF 510 SF 1113 SF 255 SF ELV 86 SF CY 8'-4" 1384 SF 177'-11 3/8" 1 PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: 6/26/2020 10:13:19 AM professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED PLAN DIAGRAM ML 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages A1.0 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK BUILDING 2 10'-5" 167'-6 1/2" PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR 23'-10" 23'-2 7/8" 24'-8 1/2" 24'-1 1/8" 24'-10 1/8" 23'-2 1/2" 23'-7 3/8" UNIT LEVEL TYPE AREA 2ND FLOOR 1BR 854 SF 1BR 35'-10" 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 39'-2 3/4" 2ND FLOOR 1BR 833 SF 854 SF 833 SF 885 SF 863 SF 890 SF 832 SF 846 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 885 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 863 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 890 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 832 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 846 SF 2ND FLOOR 2BR 1165 SF 73'-8" CIR STAIR 2ND FLOOR 2BR 1113 SF 6'-0" 1053 SF 2ND FLOOR CIR 332 SF 144 SF 2ND FLOOR 2BR 1301 SF 2ND FLOOR 2BR 1121 SF 2BR 2ND FLOOR STAIR 255 SF STAIR CIR 2BR 2ND FLOOR STAIR 359 SF 1113 SF 34'-5 1/4" 359 SF 2BR 332 SF 1301 SF 2BR 2ND FLOOR CIR 1053 SF 31'-10" 2ND FLOOR STAIR 144 SF 1165 SF 1121 SF Grand total: 16 12844 SF STAIR 255 SF 10'-5" 38'-0 7/8" 34'-8" 9'-9 5/8" 13'-7 3/8" 36'-2" 35'-2 5/8" 1 PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: 6/26/2020 10:13:20 AM professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED PLAN DIAGRAM ML 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: A1.1 315-766-1128 Urban Villages labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK Page 105 BUILDING 2 10'-5" 23'-10" 23'-2 7/8" 24'-8 1/2" 24'-1 1/8" 24'-10 1/8" 23'-2 1/2" 23'-7 3/8" 9'-0" 3RD FLOOR UNIT LEVEL TYPE AREA 3RD FLOOR 1BR 806 SF 33'-10" 3RD FLOOR 1BR 786 SF 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 39'-2 3/4" 3RD FLOOR 1BR 836 SF 806 SF 786 SF 836 SF 815 SF 841 SF 785 SF 799 SF 3RD FLOOR 1BR 815 SF 3RD FLOOR 1BR 841 SF 3RD FLOOR 1BR 785 SF 3RD FLOOR 1BR 799 SF 3RD FLOOR 1BR 799 SF STAIR 3RD FLOOR 1BR 785 SF 73'-8" 3RD FLOOR 1BR 1008 SF 1094 SF STAIR 3RD FLOOR 2BR 1183 SF 18'-0" 162 SF 3RD FLOOR 2BR 1199 SF 3RD FLOOR STAIR 162 SF 2BR 3RD FLOOR STAIR 1094 SF 1183 SF CIR 1BR 1BR 1BR 3RD FLOOR CIR 265 SF 34'-5 1/4" 2BR 265 SF 1008 SF 785 SF 799 SF 3RD FLOOR STAIR 255 SF STAIR 3RD FLOOR ELV 86 SF 1199 SF STAIR 21'-10" 359 SF 3RD FLOOR STAIR 359 SF Grand total: 18 12862 SF ELV 255 SF 24'-6 3/4" 86 SF 10'-5" 38'-0 7/8" 34'-11 5/8" 9'-6" 38'-2 1/8" 23'-2 1/2" 23'-7 3/8" 1 PROPOSED 3RD FLOOR SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: 6/26/2020 10:13:21 AM professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED PLAN DIAGRAM ML 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages A1.2 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK Page 106 BUILDING 2 LOFT UNIT LEVEL TYPE AREA 22'-4" 23'-2 7/8" 24'-8 1/2" 24'-1 1/8" 24'-10 1/8" 23'-2 1/2" 22'-1 3/8" CLEAR STORY LOFT 286 SF CLEAR STORY LOFT 298 SF CLEAR STORY LOFT 316 SF CLEAR STORY LOFT 309 SF CLEAR STORY LOFT 318 SF 12'-8 3/4" LOFT LOFT LOFT LOFT LOFT LOFT LOFT CLEAR STORY LOFT 297 SF CLEAR STORY LOFT 302 SF 286 SF 298 SF 316 SF 309 SF 318 SF 297 SF 302 SF CLEAR STORY LOFT 300 SF CLEAR STORY LOFT 295 SF CLEAR STORY LOFT 621 SF 12'-8 3/4" LOFT LOFT LOFT LOFT CLEAR STORY LOFT 428 SF 428 SF 621 SF 295 SF 300 SF Grand total: 11 3770 SF 33'-8 1/2" 48'-11 1/4" 23'-2 1/2" 22'-1 3/8" 1 PROPOSED LOFT PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: 6/26/2020 10:13:21 AM professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED PLAN DIAGRAM Author 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages A1.3 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK BUILDING 3A 1 EXISITNG 3D SCALE: It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is ISSUED FOR: 6/22/2020 3:29:15 PM altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: EXISTING 3D VIEW Author 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages EXG3D 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK BUILDING 3A I H G F E D C B A 30'-8 1/2" 29'-7 7/8" 29'-7 7/8" 29'-6 3/8" 42'-0 1/8" 5 5 PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR UNIT LEVEL TYPE AREA Basement UNDERG 12929 SF ROUND 35'-2 3/8" 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 2BR PARKING 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 1081 SF 4 1081 SF 1044 SF 1044 SF 1040 SF 1479 SF 4 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 1044 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 1044 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 1040 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 2BR 1479 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 1081 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 1044 SF CIR 80'-4 7/8" 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 1008 SF 10'-0" 3 3 2135 SF Not Placed 1BR Not Placed Not Placed 2BR Not Placed 1ST FLOOR PLAN CIR 2135 SF 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1BR 909 SF 28'-5 7/8" 1ST FLOOR PLAN 2BR 1126 SF 2 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 2BR 2 35'-2 3/8" Grand total: 14 25920 SF 1081 SF 1044 SF 1008 SF 909 SF 1126 SF 1 1 30'-8 1/2" 29'-7 7/8" 8'-0" 35'-4 1/2" 25'-9 7/8" 32'-0" I H G F E D C B A 1 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: 6/24/2020 10:31:06 AM professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED PLAN DIAGRAM ML 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: A1.1 315-766-1128 Urban Villages labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK Page 109 BUILDING 3B TYPICAL APARTMENT UNIT COMMON SPACE/ CIRCULATION INDOOR PARKING 1 PROPOSED 3D VIEW SCALE: UNDERGROUN PARKING It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: 6/26/2020 11:31:34 AM professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED 3D VIEW ML 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages A3D 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK Page 110 BUILDING 3B L K J I H G F E D C B A 224'-5 1/8" 20'-0" 18'-3" 18'-3" 23'-0" 20'-1 1/2" 19'-9 1/8" 19'-9 1/4" 19'-7 1/4" 19'-9 1/4" 19'-9 1/4" 19'-9 1/4" 1 1 STORAGE STORAGE 686 SF 931 SF STAIR 465 SF 25'-0" 2 2 25'-10" 77'-6" INDOOR PARKING (4213546 SPACES) SF 3 3 25'-0" STORAGE 4 1765 SF 4 L K J I H G F E D C B A 1 PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: 6/26/2020 11:31:19 AM professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: PROPOSED PLAN DIAGRAM ML 2201710 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: Urban Villages A1.0 315-766-1128 labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK BUILDING 3B L K J I H G F E D C B A 224'-5 1/8" 20'-0" 18'-3" 18'-3" 23'-0" 20'-1 1/2" 19'-9 1/8" 19'-9 1/4" 19'-7 1/4" 19'-9 1/4" 19'-9 1/4" 19'-9 1/4" 1 1 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 855 SF 616 SF 616 SF 777 SF 667 SF 667 SF 662 SF 667 SF 667 SF 703 SF 2 2 CIR 9'-11 5/8" CIR COMMON 846 SF 1560 SF 1195 SF 3 3 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR 33'-9" 851 SF 619 SF 616 SF 776 SF 667 SF 667 SF 662 SF 667 SF 667 SF 703 SF 4 4 L K J I H G F E D C B A 1 PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT LEVEL TYPE AREA LEVEL TYPE AREA LEVEL TYPE AREA LEVEL TYPE AREA 2ND FLOOR COMMON 1560 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 667 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 776 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 667 SF 2ND FLOOR CIR 1195 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 703 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 662 SF Grand total: 23 17393 SF 2ND FLOOR CIR 846 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 667 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 667 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 855 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 667 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 703 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 616 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 667 SF It is a violation of New York Education Law Article 145 Sec.7209, for any person, unless acting under the direction of a licensed architect, ISSUED FOR: 6/26/2020 11:31:21 AM 2ND FLOOR 1BR 616 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 616 SF professional engineer, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the seal of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor is altered; the altering architect, engineer, or land surveyor shall affix to the item their seal and notation "altered by" followed by their signature and date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. 2ND FLOOR 1BR 667 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 851 SF DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.: 2ND FLOOR 1BR 667 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 619 SF PROPOSED PLAN DIAGRAM ML 2201710 2ND FLOOR 1BR 662 SF 2ND FLOOR 1BR 777 SF 316 S. Clinton Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER: A1.1 315-766-1128 Urban Villages labellapc.com TOWN OF SALINA, NEW YORK Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Urban Villages Urban Villages Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Onondaga County Industrial Development Draft Project Summary 5/10/2021 1. Project Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC 2. Project Number 3101-21-08A 3. Location Camillus 4. School District West Genesee School District 6. Project Type New Construction 5. Tax Parcel(s) 002.-01-02.1 Village Camillus 7.Total Project Cost $ 13,005,000.00 8. Total Jobs 1.5 This will be one FTE and one PT position Land $ - 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ 1,530,000 8B: Job Creation 1.5 Building $ 9,482,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ 123,000 Equipment $ 100,000 Equipment Subject to NYS Production Exemption $ - Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 270,000 Financial Charges $ 670,000 Legal Fees $ 80,000 Other $ 100,000 Cost Benefit Analysis Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Estimated Abatement Cost $434,562 Sales Tax Abatement $349,812 Mortgage Recording Tax Abatement $84,750 Real Property Tax Relief $0 New Investment $19,860,015 PILOT Payments $0 Project Wages (10 years) $1,150,000 This is a proposed $13million development of approximated 60,500 sf of building space on Construction Wages $7,566,965 three floor that would include a mix of residential, commercial and retail use. This is the re- development of the vacant parcel at the old Camillus Cutlery Company site. Employee Benefits (10 years) $0 Project Capital Investment $11,012,000 Agency Fees $131,050 Benefit:Cost Ratio 45.70 :1 Agency Fee Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC Total Project Cost $ 13,005,000 Fees Percentage of the Total Project Cost Dollar Amount Manufacturing and <$10m 0.0075 0 Fee for All Agency Projects 0.01 $ 130,050.00 PILOT Fee 0.0025 $ - Bond Refinancing and Refunding Fee 0.0025 0 Agency Legal Fees Percentage of the Total Project Cost Dollar Amount Legal Fee ($0-$20mil) 0.0025 $ 32,512.50 Legal Fee ($20mil+) 0.00125 0 Application Fee $ 1,000.00 Total OCIDA Project Fee $ 131,050.00 Total Legal Fees $ 32,512.50 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 1 1 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 CAMILLUS MILL PHASE II DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT INTRODUCTION This project application concerns the proposed redevelopment of the vacant parcel at 52 Genesee Street where the Camillus Cutlery Company factory once stood. The former Camillus Cutlery property at 52-54 Genesee Street is owned by Camillus Mills Redevelopment Co., Inc. and is comprised of Tax Map Nos. 002.-01-02.1 (52 Genesee Street) and 002.-01-04.1 (54 Genesee Street) (together the “Property”). The entire 4.4 + acre Property is enrolled in the NYSDEC voluntary brownfield cleanup program. The Property is zoned Planned Development District (“PDD”) and has self-contained bulk and use standards assigned to it. Some 90% of the vacant 52 Genesee Street parcel is a regulated flood zone. BACKGROUND The Camillus Cutlery Company, once among the largest knife manufacturers in the US, was the economic anchor of the Village of Camillus for more than 100 years. The company fell on hard times, declared bankruptcy and closed its doors in 2007. In 2013 one of the largest fires in Onondaga County history destroyed the sprawling 140,000 sf wood frame former factory complex. An adjacent 41,000 sf building that formerly housed the Camillus Cutlery headquarters, knife polishing, packaging and shipping operation survived the fire with only minor damage. COMPLETED PHASE 1 A single-purpose entity called Camillus Mills, LLC completed an $11 million certified historic rehabilitation of the National Register-listed former Camillus Cutlery headquarters building at 54 Genesee Street in 2017. Camillus Mills, LLC owns the building, and its affiliate, Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc., retains ownership of the land. Today, through adaptive reuse, the 41,000 sf former headquarters contains 29 residential apartments and 8,800 sf of commercial space. Fully remediated, renovated, and occupied since 2017, the old headquarters is, once again, a vibrant and welcomed presence in the heart of the Village’s downtown. Under the approved PDD, that project was envisioned as Phase I of an anticipated three-phase redevelopment of the 52-54 Genesee Street Property. 1 Page 161 PROPOSED PHASE II - THE PROJECT A second single-purpose entity called Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC - also an affiliate of Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc. - in furtherance of the approved PDD master plan, now wishes to begin Phase II of the PDD redevelopment. A future Phase III project is planned for another time. The proposed $13 million Phase II development (“the Project”) includes approximately 60,500 square feet of occupied building space on three floors. The proposed new building is to be sited on the concrete slab of the former factory along the west bank of Nine Mile Creek on the eastern portion of the Property. The Phase II building will be a mix of commercial office and retail uses on the first floor near Genesee Street, and residential apartments through the remainder of the building. The plan includes some 6,500 sf of commercial/retail uses. The remaining 54,000 sf has been planned for 58 one- and two-bedroom market-rate apartments and associated common areas. Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC will own the building and its affiliate, Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc., will retain ownership of the land. PHASE II BUILDING FEATURES The Phase II Project includes three occupied stories plus basement, and has an average height of approximately 43 feet above grade. The Project has been designed with clapboard siding, ample windows, numerous residential balconies and, after discussions with SHPO officials, a flat roof throughout. The proposed Phase II recalls the old Camillus Cutlery factory without replicating its specific features. Unlike the old factory, which sat adjacent the sidewalk on Genesee Street, the new Project has been set back some forty feet in deference to the National Register Landmark former headquarters next door. The development program includes some 44 covered, lower-level parking stalls. Another 53 open lot spaces will be constructed immediately north of the new building. The building’s exterior will be lighted by building-mounted fixtures, and all parking lot lighting will be consistent with lighting choices made in Phase I with downcast post-mounted fixtures that minimize sky-glow conditions or light spillage onto adjacent properties or roadways. The principal outdoor site amenity for building residents is a linear green space with seating areas, barbeque facilities and an overlook along Nine Mile Creek. Space running the length of the property along Nine Mile Creek has been reserved for a future, publicly-sponsored Creekwalk that proponents hope can be connected with the Town of Camillus’ nearby Erie Canal Park one-mile north of the Property, and via the Erie Canal Trailway, eventually be linked to the Lakeshore Trail around Onondaga Lake. 2 Page 162 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT/MANAGEMENT The principals of Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc., Camillus Mills, LLC and Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC have considerable development experience with similar mixed-use facilities. Three, including Ted Kinder, Bob Medina and Doug Sutherland, are partners in Franklin Properties of Syracuse. Through various Franklin Properties-affiliated entities, they and other partners have developed, own and manage some $50 million in commercial and residential facilities. Several are certified historic rehabilitations of National Register Landmark properties adapted for residential and commercial purposes. Two are Brownfield sites remediated and returned to productive use under the NYSDEC’s Voluntary Clean-up Program (“VCP”). The Project will be managed by Sutton Companies, a highly respected, full-service RE leasing and management company that was established in 1933. The Sutton Companies manages some 2,000 apartments and more than one million square feet of commercial space throughout CNY including Phase 1 of the Camillus Mills complex. ANTICIPATED JOB CREATION AND EMPLOYMENT We anticipate Camillus Mills Phase II will hire one full-time property management person. A second part-time property management person will also be employed by the facility. Separately, it is anticipated the development’s 6,500 sf of commercial space will be leased to commercial enterprises that employ between 12 and 18 persons. There are no lease commitments yet, so it is not possible to be more precise. PROJECT BENEFICIARY ASSISTANCE Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC is a single-purpose entity formed to develop and own the Project. It won a $675,000 grant commitment from the State of New York’s Empire Development Corporation CFA program to be apportioned between Camillus Mills Phase II ($340,000) and the future Camillus Mills Phase III ($335,000). In 2017/8, a separate entity, Camillus Mills, LLC, which includes the same members but at different ownership interests, received a Restore NY State Grant of $2,340,000, a NYS REDC grant of $500,000 and an Onondaga County Main Street Grant of $36,500 for the rehabilitation of the former Camillus Cutlery headquarters building (Camillus Mills Phase I). 3 Page 163 PROJECT CHALLENGES This old industrial site presents an unusual set of challenges that add considerable cost and complexity to the Project: FEMA-designated floodplain. 90% of the 52 Genesee Street Property is in a regulated flood zone. FEMA’s flood plain regulations require a) the first occupied floor of a new building built in a flood plain to be no less than two feet above the flood plain, and b) the new building not impede the flow of any future flood waters. In this case, the Phase II building will need to be constructed on a 20,000-sf platform elevated on concrete and steel columns some 12-feet above the concrete slab of the old factory floor. It will be a very costly burden for the project. Designated NYS Brownfield Site – The entire 4.4-acre Property is governed by rules established in the NYSDEC’s Voluntary Clean-up Program. Phase I, the former Cutlery headquarters building – supposedly the “clean portion” of the site, required well more than $1 million in remediation and mitigation measures. Phase II, to be constructed on the former factory site, will likely present further environmental challenges, particularly at points where the concrete slab of the old factory will be disturbed for structural piles and other purposes. REQUEST FOR OCIDA FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE – FEASIBILITY STATEMENT The multi-phase Camillus Mills redevelopment is of critical importance to the Village of Camillus, a modest community of approximately 1,200 residents. Phase I, an $11 million certified historic rehabilitation of the old headquarters building, confirmed Camillus Mill’s market appeal. Phase II, the largest of the three components outlined in the approved Camillus Mills PDD, is now an empty concrete slab across from Village Hall. Substantial mixed-use infill projects in old villages like Camillus are generally difficult to develop. Returning this central site to attractive and productive use is made more difficult by both the FEMA Flood Zone and NYS DEC Brownfield site conditions. We request OCIDA assistance in the form of a Mortgage and Recording Tax Exemption and a State and local Sales and Use Tax Exemption to partially offset the extraordinary site development costs associated with this highly-visible village property. 4 Page 164 Page 165 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency DRAFT Project Summary 4/7/2021 1. Project C2 NY Sentinel Heights 2. Project Number 3101-21-05A 3. Location LaFayette 4. School District LaFayette Central School District 6. Project Type New construction of a community solar project 5. Tax Parcel(s) 025.-03-05.1; 025.-03.05.2 0 7.Total Project Cost $ 7,656,250 8. Total Jobs 0 Land $ 281,250 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ 100,000 8B: Job Creation 0 Building $ 2,000,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ 4,500,000 Equipment Subject to NYS Production $ - Exemption Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 100,000 Financial Charges $ - Legal Fees $ - Other- Solar Installation Labor $ 600,000 Cost Benefit Analysis C2 NY Sentinel Heights Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Abatement Cost $ 1,549,578 Sales Tax $ 306,250 Mortgage Tax $ - Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $ 1,243,328 New Investment $ 8,707,816 PILOT Payments $ 594,562 Project Wages (10 years) $ - Construction Wages $ 435,300 This is a 3.375 KW Community Distributed Generation Solar Project to occupy 23 acres of land in the Town of LaFayette. Employee Benefits (10 years) $ - Project Capital Investment $ 7,581,250 New Sales Tax Generated $ - Agency Fees $ 96,703 Agency Legal Fees $ 19,141 Benefit:Cost Ratio 6 :1 Page 166 C2 NY Sentinel Heights DRAFT 4/7/2021 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet Current Revenue Generated by Parcel $ 2,945 Expected Revenue from the Parcel if no project occurred $ 96,208 Projected Year 1 Revenue to be generated as a result of the project: $18,563 Total Project Cost $ 7,656,250 OCIDA Estimate of Project Value $ 2,250,000 Projected MW to be generated 3.375 LaFayette Central Full Tax Payment without Year Onondaga County LaFayette Total PILOT Net Exemption School District PILOT 17.8% 18.4% 63.8% 100.0% 2019-2020 $ 524 $ 543 $ 1,878 $ 2,945 1 $ 3,300 $ 3,422 $ 11,840 $ 18,563 $ 46,143 $ 27,580 2 $ 3,366 $ 3,491 $ 12,077 $ 18,934 $ 47,066 $ 28,132 3 $ 3,433 $ 3,560 $ 12,319 $ 19,312 $ 48,007 $ 28,695 4 $ 3,502 $ 3,632 $ 12,565 $ 19,699 $ 48,967 $ 29,269 5 $ 3,572 $ 3,704 $ 12,816 $ 20,093 $ 49,947 $ 29,854 6 $ 3,643 $ 3,778 $ 13,073 $ 20,494 $ 50,946 $ 30,451 7 $ 3,716 $ 3,854 $ 13,334 $ 20,904 $ 51,964 $ 31,060 8 $ 3,791 $ 3,931 $ 13,601 $ 21,322 $ 53,004 $ 31,681 9 $ 3,866 $ 4,010 $ 13,873 $ 21,749 $ 54,064 $ 32,315 10 $ 3,944 $ 4,090 $ 14,150 $ 22,184 $ 55,145 $ 32,961 11 $ 4,023 $ 4,172 $ 14,433 $ 22,628 $ 56,248 $ 33,620 12 $ 4,103 $ 4,255 $ 14,722 $ 23,080 $ 57,373 $ 34,293 13 $ 4,185 $ 4,340 $ 15,016 $ 23,542 $ 58,520 $ 34,979 14 $ 4,269 $ 4,427 $ 15,317 $ 24,013 $ 59,691 $ 35,678 15 $ 4,354 $ 4,516 $ 15,623 $ 24,493 $ 60,885 $ 36,392 16 $ 4,441 $ 4,606 $ 15,935 $ 24,983 $ 94,715 $ 71,127 17 $ 4,530 $ 4,698 $ 16,254 $ 25,482 $ 96,609 $ 72,550 18 $ 4,621 $ 4,792 $ 16,579 $ 25,992 $ 98,542 $ 72,550 19 $ 4,713 $ 4,888 $ 16,911 $ 26,512 $ 100,512 $ 74,001 20 $ 4,807 $ 4,986 $ 17,249 $ 27,042 $ 102,523 $ 75,481 21 $ 4,904 $ 5,085 $ 17,594 $ 27,583 $ 104,573 $ 76,990 22 $ 5,002 $ 5,187 $ 17,946 $ 28,135 $ 106,665 $ 78,530 23 $ 5,102 $ 5,291 $ 18,305 $ 28,697 $ 108,798 $ 80,101 24 $ 5,204 $ 5,396 $ 18,671 $ 29,271 $ 110,974 $ 81,703 25 $ 5,308 $ 5,504 $ 19,044 $ 29,857 $ 113,193 $ 83,337 $ 105,700 $ 109,614 $ 379,248 $ 594,562 $ 1,835,074 $ 1,243,328 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A. Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 Page 192 B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Town , Yes No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village Yes No Planning Board or Commission c. City Town or Yes No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies Yes No e. County agencies Yes No f. Regional agencies Yes No g. State agencies Yes No h. Federal agencies Yes No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? Yes No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? Yes No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? Yes No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the Yes No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site Yes No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action Yes No would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway Yes No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, Yes No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 13 Page 193 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. Yes No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? Yes No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? Yes No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. What parks serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? _____________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? _____________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _____________ acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? Yes No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? Yes No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? Yes No iii. Number of lots proposed? ________ iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? Yes No If No, anticipated period of construction: _____ months If Yes: Total number of phases anticipated _____ Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 13 Page 194 f. Does the project include new residential uses? Yes No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? Yes No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any Yes No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: Ground water Surface water streams Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? Yes No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? Yes No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? Yes No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment Yes No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 Page 195 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? Yes No If Yes: a of vegetation proposed to be removed ___________________________________________________________ acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion ________________________________________ purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? Yes No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? Yes No If Yes: Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________ Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? Yes No Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No Is expansion of the district needed? Yes No Do existing lines serve the project site? Yes No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? Yes No If Yes: Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? Yes No If, Yes: Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? Yes No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? Yes No If Yes: Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? Yes No Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No Is expansion of the district needed? Yes No Page 5 of 13 Page 196 Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? Yes No Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? Yes No If Yes: Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? Yes No If Yes: Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point Yes No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? Yes No iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? Yes No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel Yes No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, Yes No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet Yes No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: ___________Tons/year ( ) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) ___________Tons/year ( ) of Nitrous Oxide (N2 ) ___________Tons/year ( ) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) ___________Tons/year ( ) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) ___________Tons/year ( ) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflo rocarbons (H ) ___________Tons/year ( ) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 6 of 13 Page 197 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, Yes No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as Yes No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial Yes No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): Morning Evening Weekend Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day Parking spaces: Existing _____________ Proposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________ v. vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? Yes No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric Yes No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing Yes No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand Yes No for energy? If Yes: The proposed action is an alternative energy project that will generate electricity without any carbon emissions. i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade to an existing substation? Yes No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: Monday - Friday: _________________________ Monday - Friday: ____________________________ Saturday: ________________________________ Saturday: ___________________________________ Sunday: _________________________________ Sunday: ____________________________________ Holidays: ________________________________ Holidays: ___________________________________ Page 7 of 13 Page 198 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, Yes No operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? Yes No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? Yes No If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? Yes No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? Yes No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum ( over 1,100 gallons) Yes No or chemical products ? If Yes: Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________ Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year) Generally describe proposed storage facilities ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, Yes No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? Yes No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal Yes No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 13 Page 199 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? Yes No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: ________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or ________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous Yes No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? Yes No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. Urban Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) Forest Agriculture Aquatic Other (specify): ____________________________________ ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres +/-) Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces Forested Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) Other Describe: _______________________________ ________________________________________ Page 9 of 13 Page 200 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? Yes No i. If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed Yes No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? Yes No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: Dam height: _________________________________ feet Dam length: _________________________________ feet Surface area: _________________________________ acres Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, Yes No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? Yes No If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin Yes No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any Yes No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site Yes No Remediation database? Check all that apply: Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? Yes No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10 of 13 Page 201 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? Yes No If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? Yes No Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? Yes No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________ __________% ___________________________ __________% ____________________________ __________% d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: Well Drained: _____% of ite Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site Poorly Drained _____% of ite f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 0-10%: _____% of site 10-15%: _____% of site 15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? Yes No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, Yes No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? Yes No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, Yes No state or local agency? iv. For each identified wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________ Approximate Size ___________________ Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired Yes No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? Yes No j. Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? Yes No k. Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? Yes No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? Yes No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 13 Page 202 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? Yes No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Extent of community/habitat: Currently: ______________________ acres Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as Yes No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of Yes No special concern? q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? Yes No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to Yes No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? Yes No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National Yes No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: Biological Community Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? Yes No If Yes: i. CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 13 Page 203 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district Yes No which is listed on of Historic P of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: Archaeological Site Historic Building or District ii. Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Yes No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? Yes No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h. the project site any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local Yes No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Distance between project and resource: _____________________ miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers Yes No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? Yes No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Date_______________________________________ Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________ Page 13 of 13 Page 204 EAF Mapper Summary Report Page 205 1 Page 206 2 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 LaFayette Central School District Four Schools, Three Buildings, Two Nations, One Goal: Excellence! LaFayette Jr./Sr. High School Big Picture School C. Grant Grimshaw Elementary Onondaga Nation School 3122 Route 11 North 3122 Route 11 North 5957 Route 20 West 3285 State Route 11A LaFayette, NY 13084 LaFayette, NY 13084 LaFayette, NY 13084 Nedrow, NY 13120 April 19, 2021 Robert M. Petrovich, Director Onondaga County Office of Economic Development 333 W. Washington Street, Suite 130 Syracuse, New York 13202 Re: C2 NY Sentinel Heights Dear Director Petrovich: I am writing on behalf of the LaFayette Central School District. Is our understanding that C2 Energy Capital, LLC has proposed to construct a 3.375-megawatts AC solar project on Sentinel Heights Road in the Town of LaFayette (Tax Parcel Nos. 025.-03-05.1 and 025.-03-05.2). As we understand it, the project is being constructed pursuant to New York State’s Community Solar initiative. This project will generate clean renewable energy for local residents, and those residents who choose to subscribe to the project will see a reduction in their energy bills due to this project. It is also the District’s understanding that the Company has sought to enter into a payment in lieu of tax agreement with the Onondaga County IDA under which the Company will pay $4,000/megawatt each year for 25 years. The School District will receive a pro rata share of such payment based on the real property tax burden. I am writing to advise that the LaFayette Central School District supports the proposed project based on the terms and information provided to the District. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Jeremy L. Belfield Superintendent of Schools Mission: At LaFayette, we put students first. Our mission is to educate, honor, and develop students to have self-respect, a commitment to the community, and a passion for excellence. Vision: Inspire, Page 219 empower, and prepare all students to achieve excellence. Page 220