April 2021 — FINAL-April-13-2021-OCIDA-Board-Packet-reduced2.pdf ================================================================ ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 333 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 130, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 PHONE: 315.435.3770  FAX: 315.435.3669  ONGOVED.COM Meeting Agenda DRAFT April 13, 2021 8:00 AM Call to Order the Regular Meeting of the Agency A. Approval of Minutes-March 9, 2021 B. Treasurer’s Report C. Payment of Bills D. Conflict of Interest Action Items 1. Brolex Plank Road LLC (3101-21-03A) Second Meeting Brolex Plank Road, LLC is proposing to construct two 24-unit apartment buildings in the Town of Clay. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, and mortgage recording tax. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A Resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, and mortgage recording taxes. Representative: Brandon Jacobson, Managing Member & Jason Mehl, Project Manager, Brolex Plank Road ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 333 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 130, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 PHONE: 315.435.3770  FAX: 315.435.3669  ONGOVED.COM Meeting Agenda DRAFT April 13, 2021 8:00 AM Call to Order the Regular Meeting of the Agency A. Approval of Minutes-March 9, 2021 B. Treasurer’s Report C. Payment of Bills D. Conflict of Interest Action Items 1. Brolex Plank Road LLC (3101-21-03A) Second Meeting Brolex Plank Road, LLC is proposing to construct two 24-unit apartment buildings in the Town of Clay. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, and mortgage recording tax. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A Resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, and mortgage recording taxes. Representative: Brandon Jacobson, Managing Member & Jason Mehl, Project Manager, Brolex Plank Road 2. UR-Ban Villages PFA, LLC (3101-21-07A) Initial Meeting UR-Ban Villages PFA, LLC is proposing to develop 88 residential units at 100 Buckley Road, the former Will & Baumer candle factory site in the Town of Salina. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording tax. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize a public hearing. Representative: Vittorio Pascarella, Member, UR-Ban Villages, PFA Page1 3. Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc. / Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC (3101- 21-08A) Initial Meeting Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc. and Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC are proposing the redevelopment of the Camillus Cutlery Company site in the Village of Camillus. The project consists of approximately 60,500 sq. ft. of occupied multi-use space and associated parking. The applicants are requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, and mortgage recording tax. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board to authorize a public hearing. Representative: Douglas Sutherland, Managing Member, Camillus Mills II, LLC 4. Legal Advice Session 5. Purchase Contract Execution Authorization to enter into two purchase contracts for property. 2. UR-Ban Villages PFA, LLC (3101-21-07A) Initial Meeting UR-Ban Villages PFA, LLC is proposing to develop 88 residential units at 100 Buckley Road, the former Will & Baumer candle factory site in the Town of Salina. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording tax. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize a public hearing. Representative: Vittorio Pascarella, Member, UR-Ban Villages, PFA Page1 3. Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc. / Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC (3101- 21-08A) Initial Meeting Camillus Mills Redevelopment Company, Inc. and Camillus Mills Phase II, LLC are proposing the redevelopment of the Camillus Cutlery Company site in the Village of Camillus. The project consists of approximately 60,500 sq. ft. of occupied multi-use space and associated parking. The applicants are requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, and mortgage recording tax. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board to authorize a public hearing. Representative: Douglas Sutherland, Managing Member, Camillus Mills II, LLC 4. Legal Advice Session 5. Purchase Contract Execution Authorization to enter into two purchase contracts for property. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A Resolution of the Board authorizing the Executive Director to enter into two purchase contracts and any related documents with respect to two parcels of property. Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA 6. Hold for /April 29 Special Meeting to review and discuss supplemental draft EIS and set public comment and hearing schedule. 7. C2 NY Sentinel Heights Solar, LLC (3101-21-05A) Initial Meeting C2 NY Sentinel Heights Solar, LLC is proposing the construction of 3.375 megawatt solar project in the Town of Lafayette. The applicant is requesting exemption from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, and real estate transfer taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize a public hearing. Representative: Elie Schechter, Consultant, C2 Energy Capital, LLC 2 Page2 8. Taft Road Solar, LLC / SLH II, LLC (3101-21-09B) Initial Meeting Taft Road Solar, LLC and SLH II, LLC are proposing to construct a 3.7 megawatt solar project in the Town of Manlius. The applicants are requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, and real estate transfer taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board to authorize a public hearing. Representative: Andrew Day, Member, Source Renewables, LLC Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A Resolution of the Board authorizing the Executive Director to enter into two purchase contracts and any related documents with respect to two parcels of property. Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA 6. Hold for /April 29 Special Meeting to review and discuss supplemental draft EIS and set public comment and hearing schedule. 7. C2 NY Sentinel Heights Solar, LLC (3101-21-05A) Initial Meeting C2 NY Sentinel Heights Solar, LLC is proposing the construction of 3.375 megawatt solar project in the Town of Lafayette. The applicant is requesting exemption from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, and real estate transfer taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution of the Board to authorize a public hearing. Representative: Elie Schechter, Consultant, C2 Energy Capital, LLC 2 Page2 8. Taft Road Solar, LLC / SLH II, LLC (3101-21-09B) Initial Meeting Taft Road Solar, LLC and SLH II, LLC are proposing to construct a 3.7 megawatt solar project in the Town of Manlius. The applicants are requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, and real estate transfer taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board to authorize a public hearing. Representative: Andrew Day, Member, Source Renewables, LLC 9. Abundant Solar Power (E1) LLC (3101-20-13B) Abundant Solar Power (E1) LLC is requesting the board to consent to a sale of its membership interests. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution authorizing the sale of the membership interest of a project applicant. Representative: Melissa Clark, VP Business Development, Abundant Solar Energy, Inc. 10. OYA Church Road A LLC (3101-20-04A) OYA Church Road A LLC is requesting the board to consent to a sale of its membership interests. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution authorizing the sale of the membership interest of a project applicant. Representative: Glenn MacKay, Project Manager, OYA Solar, LLC 11. New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway Corporation The NYS&W is requesting support to pursue possible funding sources for improvements to the bridge that passes over West Onondaga Street in the City of Syracuse and related structures. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution in support of the New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway Corporation seeking funding sources for improvements to the bridge that passes over West Onondaga Street in the City of Syracuse and related structures. Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA Adjourn 3 Page3 9. Abundant Solar Power (E1) LLC (3101-20-13B) Abundant Solar Power (E1) LLC is requesting the board to consent to a sale of its membership interests. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution authorizing the sale of the membership interest of a project applicant. Representative: Melissa Clark, VP Business Development, Abundant Solar Energy, Inc. 10. OYA Church Road A LLC (3101-20-04A) OYA Church Road A LLC is requesting the board to consent to a sale of its membership interests. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution authorizing the sale of the membership interest of a project applicant. Representative: Glenn MacKay, Project Manager, OYA Solar, LLC 11. New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway Corporation The NYS&W is requesting support to pursue possible funding sources for improvements to the bridge that passes over West Onondaga Street in the City of Syracuse and related structures. Agency Action Requested: a. A Resolution in support of the New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway Corporation seeking funding sources for improvements to the bridge that passes over West Onondaga Street in the City of Syracuse and related structures. Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA Adjourn 3 Page3 SUBJECT TO BOARD APPROVAL Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Regular Meeting Minutes March 9, 2021 A regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Tuesday, March 9, 2021 via Zoom Teleconference. Patrick Hogan called the meeting to order at 8:18 am with the following: PRESENT: Patrick Hogan Janice Herzog Victor Ianno Steve Morgan Kevin Ryan Fanny Villarreal ABSENT: Susan Stanczyk ALSO PRESENT: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director Nancy Lowery, Secretary Nate Stevens, Treasurer Karen Doster, Recording Secretary, Agency Carolyn Evans-Dean, Economic Development Jeff Davis, Barclay Damon Law Firm Kevin McAuliffe, Barclay Damon Law Firm Amanda Fitzgerald, Barclay Damon Law Firm Victor Ianno, Board Member Steve Morgan, Board Member Kevin Ryan, Board Member Fanny Villarreal, Board Member Mike Lisson, Grossman St Amour PLLC Joseph Markert, DL Manufacturing Glenn MacKay, OYA Solar, LLC John Switzer, SSC Lysander Brandon Jackson, Brolex Plank Road, LLC Jason Mehl, Brolex Plank Road, LLC Charles Breuer, Hueber-Breuer (Patrick Hogan shared information as to how the meeting will be conducted in light of COVID- 19 at the start of the Audit Committee Meeting.) Page4 APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – JANUARY 20, 2021 & FEBRUARY 9, 2021 SUBJECT TO BOARD APPROVAL Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Regular Meeting Minutes March 9, 2021 A regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Tuesday, March 9, 2021 via Zoom Teleconference. Patrick Hogan called the meeting to order at 8:18 am with the following: PRESENT: Patrick Hogan Janice Herzog Victor Ianno Steve Morgan Kevin Ryan Fanny Villarreal ABSENT: Susan Stanczyk ALSO PRESENT: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director Nancy Lowery, Secretary Nate Stevens, Treasurer Karen Doster, Recording Secretary, Agency Carolyn Evans-Dean, Economic Development Jeff Davis, Barclay Damon Law Firm Kevin McAuliffe, Barclay Damon Law Firm Amanda Fitzgerald, Barclay Damon Law Firm Victor Ianno, Board Member Steve Morgan, Board Member Kevin Ryan, Board Member Fanny Villarreal, Board Member Mike Lisson, Grossman St Amour PLLC Joseph Markert, DL Manufacturing Glenn MacKay, OYA Solar, LLC John Switzer, SSC Lysander Brandon Jackson, Brolex Plank Road, LLC Jason Mehl, Brolex Plank Road, LLC Charles Breuer, Hueber-Breuer (Patrick Hogan shared information as to how the meeting will be conducted in light of COVID- 19 at the start of the Audit Committee Meeting.) Page4 APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – JANUARY 20, 2021 & FEBRUARY 9, 2021 Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved the regular meeting minutes of January 20, 2021and February 9, 2021meeting. Motion was carried. TREASURER’S REPORT Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of February 2021. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved the Treasurer’s Report for the month of February 2021. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved the regular meeting minutes of January 20, 2021and February 9, 2021meeting. Motion was carried. TREASURER’S REPORT Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of February 2021. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved the Treasurer’s Report for the month of February 2021. Motion was carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Payment of Bills Schedule #453. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved the Payment of Bills Schedule #453 for $52,497.14, PILOT payments to the Town of Cicero for $5,849.00, Town of DeWitt for $98,517.80, North Syracuse Central School District for $36,338.00, East Syracuse Minoa Central School District for $500,317.71 and Onondaga County for $110,913.71 and COVID-19 Grant Payments totaling $40,284.46. Motion was carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Payment of Bills Schedule #453. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved the Payment of Bills Schedule #453 for $52,497.14, PILOT payments to the Town of Cicero for $5,849.00, Town of DeWitt for $98,517.80, North Syracuse Central School District for $36,338.00, East Syracuse Minoa Central School District for $500,317.71 and Onondaga County for $110,913.71 and COVID-19 Grant Payments totaling $40,284.46. Motion was carried. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE The Conflict of Interest was emailed to Board Members present to sign off. AUDIT FROM GROSSMAN ST. AMOUR Patrick Hogan stated the Audit presentation was made at the Audit Committee meeting. Victor Ianno stated he was impressed with the professionalism and the ease with which the document were able to be read and understood. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution approving the 2020 Audit of the Agency. Motion was carried. 2 Page5 DL MANUFACTURING, INC./METZ PROPERTIES LLC (3101-21-04A) INITIAL MEETING. Joseph Markert stated DL Manufacturing manufactures loading dock equipment and they sell to 500 companies. He stated they are currently leasing 11,000 square feet from Eagle Comtronics who also builds products for DL Manufacturing. He stated they lease a truck and run 3 loads a day with supplies. He stated they are looking at a 17,000 square foot expansion onto the building. He stated it will be warehousing but they are also expanding their manufacturing capabilities and streamlining the process. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the DL Manufacturing, Inc./Metz Properties LLC project. Motion was carried. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE The Conflict of Interest was emailed to Board Members present to sign off. AUDIT FROM GROSSMAN ST. AMOUR Patrick Hogan stated the Audit presentation was made at the Audit Committee meeting. Victor Ianno stated he was impressed with the professionalism and the ease with which the document were able to be read and understood. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution approving the 2020 Audit of the Agency. Motion was carried. 2 Page5 DL MANUFACTURING, INC./METZ PROPERTIES LLC (3101-21-04A) INITIAL MEETING. Joseph Markert stated DL Manufacturing manufactures loading dock equipment and they sell to 500 companies. He stated they are currently leasing 11,000 square feet from Eagle Comtronics who also builds products for DL Manufacturing. He stated they lease a truck and run 3 loads a day with supplies. He stated they are looking at a 17,000 square foot expansion onto the building. He stated it will be warehousing but they are also expanding their manufacturing capabilities and streamlining the process. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the DL Manufacturing, Inc./Metz Properties LLC project. Motion was carried. OYA CAMILLUS A LLC (3101-20-16C) Nancy Lowery stated the total project cost was blank and that was added to complete the application but no substantial changes. She stated the CBA has not changed. Glenn Mackay stated the amount of job creation was modified to zero jobs. He stated no total cost to the project has changed and no features of the layout has changed. Nancy Lowery stated public hearings for OYA Camillus A and B were held and there were no comments received for the project. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the OYA Camillus A LLC project. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes and real estate transfer taxes for the OYA Camillus A LLC project. Motion was carried. 3 Page6 OYA CAMILLUS A LLC (3101-20-16C) Nancy Lowery stated the total project cost was blank and that was added to complete the application but no substantial changes. She stated the CBA has not changed. Glenn Mackay stated the amount of job creation was modified to zero jobs. He stated no total cost to the project has changed and no features of the layout has changed. Nancy Lowery stated public hearings for OYA Camillus A and B were held and there were no comments received for the project. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the OYA Camillus A LLC project. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes and real estate transfer taxes for the OYA Camillus A LLC project. Motion was carried. 3 Page6 OYA CAMILLUS B LLC (3101-20-17D) Patrick Hogan asked why the projects need to be divided. Glenn Mackay stated as part of the New York Sun Renewable Energy program called Community Solar, the state has capped the size of the project to 5 megawatts. He stated they have the availability of land to make essentially 10 megawatts but they divided it in two. He stated that makes it so the utility company can control the generating facilities easier. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the OYA Camillus B LLC project. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes and real estate transfer taxes for the OYA Camillus B LLC project. Motion was carried. OYA CAMILLUS B LLC (3101-20-17D) Patrick Hogan asked why the projects need to be divided. Glenn Mackay stated as part of the New York Sun Renewable Energy program called Community Solar, the state has capped the size of the project to 5 megawatts. He stated they have the availability of land to make essentially 10 megawatts but they divided it in two. He stated that makes it so the utility company can control the generating facilities easier. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the OYA Camillus B LLC project. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes and real estate transfer taxes for the OYA Camillus B LLC project. Motion was carried. SSC LYSANDER, LLC (3101-2-21A) MEETING TO MODIFY John Switzer stated they are requesting to change control to Goldman Sachs Renewable Power. He stated they have transacted with Goldman Sachs on 9 solar projects in Upstate NY. He stated Goldman has about 800 solar projects in 27 states which is about 2.3 gigawatts. He stated he believes they have a couple trillion under management. He stated they are requesting the Board to transfer controlling interest. He stated it is an approved PILOT so essentially requesting to change control for this approved PILOT Agreement to Goldman Sachs when it closes. Amanda Fitzgerald stated the Board has done similar things like this before and is similar to what was allowed for Abundant Solar. She stated the actual company that the Agency provided benefits to has not changed but the ownership interest has changed. She stated it is one step removed of which company is receiving the benefit. She stated it is still a proper practice for 4 Page7 SSC to have brought this to the Board for approval because it is ultimately impacting who is receiving the benefits. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution consenting to the sale of a controlling interest in SSC Lysander LLC to GSRP Development Company X LLC. Motion was carried. SSC LYSANDER, LLC (3101-2-21A) MEETING TO MODIFY John Switzer stated they are requesting to change control to Goldman Sachs Renewable Power. He stated they have transacted with Goldman Sachs on 9 solar projects in Upstate NY. He stated Goldman has about 800 solar projects in 27 states which is about 2.3 gigawatts. He stated he believes they have a couple trillion under management. He stated they are requesting the Board to transfer controlling interest. He stated it is an approved PILOT so essentially requesting to change control for this approved PILOT Agreement to Goldman Sachs when it closes. Amanda Fitzgerald stated the Board has done similar things like this before and is similar to what was allowed for Abundant Solar. She stated the actual company that the Agency provided benefits to has not changed but the ownership interest has changed. She stated it is one step removed of which company is receiving the benefit. She stated it is still a proper practice for 4 Page7 SSC to have brought this to the Board for approval because it is ultimately impacting who is receiving the benefits. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution consenting to the sale of a controlling interest in SSC Lysander LLC to GSRP Development Company X LLC. Motion was carried. Janice Herzog recused herself from Brolex Plank Road LLC and The Trey Jay at Loso, LLC projects due to a conflict of interest and she left the meeting. Janice Herzog recused herself from Brolex Plank Road LLC and The Trey Jay at Loso, LLC projects due to a conflict of interest and she left the meeting. BROLEX PLANK ROAD LLC (3101-21-03A) INITIAL MEETING Brandon Jacobson stated they recently purchased property on South Main Street in North Syracuse and they are looking to put in 48 units. He stated there is a major housing crisis in our County so they thought this would be a great place to put this project. He stated it is one of the last remaining parcels with a couple acres left in the village. He stated there is housing surrounding it, has all the amenities the village offers and they think it would a great addition to the community. Patrick Hogan asked if this is an over 55 facility. Brandon Jacobson stated yes and will have elevators to make it easier for tenants to get to the 2nd or 3rd floor if they wanted to live there. He stated that 55 is their target market but they are not limiting who wants to live there. Patrick Hogan stated that walkability is big thing for that age group. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the Brolex Plank Road LLC project. Motion was carried. BROLEX PLANK ROAD LLC (3101-21-03A) INITIAL MEETING Brandon Jacobson stated they recently purchased property on South Main Street in North Syracuse and they are looking to put in 48 units. He stated there is a major housing crisis in our County so they thought this would be a great place to put this project. He stated it is one of the last remaining parcels with a couple acres left in the village. He stated there is housing surrounding it, has all the amenities the village offers and they think it would a great addition to the community. Patrick Hogan asked if this is an over 55 facility. Brandon Jacobson stated yes and will have elevators to make it easier for tenants to get to the 2nd or 3rd floor if they wanted to live there. He stated that 55 is their target market but they are not limiting who wants to live there. Patrick Hogan stated that walkability is big thing for that age group. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the Brolex Plank Road LLC project. Motion was carried. TREY JAY AT LOSO, LLC (3101-2-6A) INITIAL MEETING Charlie Breuer stated the project is located at 6477 Lake Shore Road. He stated they are proposing 13 total buildings with access off of Lake Shore Road as well as a secondary access 5 Page8 off Beach Road. He stated the project will consist of 12, 3-story buildings creating 248 residential units. He stated it will be a mix of 1 and 2 bedroom units with rent being from $1,000 to $1,800 per month. He stated the 13th building will be a club house and will include a fitness center, community room, a marina and property management offices. He stated the project will retain the 75 spot full service marina. He stated there will be approximately 1,100 feet of shore line on Oneida Lake. He stated they have been working on this project for over 3 years with site plan approval taking place in 2018. He stated they had some title issues but are now behind them and were able to close on the property earlier this year. He stated they believe it will be a tremendous benefit to our community. He stated Loso provided a housing community of Cicero residents who downsized to remain and contribute to the town. He stated they also create an opportunity for those who want to live on water front property but could not afford it due to an increase in lakefront residential prices. TREY JAY AT LOSO, LLC (3101-2-6A) INITIAL MEETING Charlie Breuer stated the project is located at 6477 Lake Shore Road. He stated they are proposing 13 total buildings with access off of Lake Shore Road as well as a secondary access 5 Page8 off Beach Road. He stated the project will consist of 12, 3-story buildings creating 248 residential units. He stated it will be a mix of 1 and 2 bedroom units with rent being from $1,000 to $1,800 per month. He stated the 13th building will be a club house and will include a fitness center, community room, a marina and property management offices. He stated the project will retain the 75 spot full service marina. He stated there will be approximately 1,100 feet of shore line on Oneida Lake. He stated they have been working on this project for over 3 years with site plan approval taking place in 2018. He stated they had some title issues but are now behind them and were able to close on the property earlier this year. He stated they believe it will be a tremendous benefit to our community. He stated Loso provided a housing community of Cicero residents who downsized to remain and contribute to the town. He stated they also create an opportunity for those who want to live on water front property but could not afford it due to an increase in lakefront residential prices. Victor Ianno stated we are spending a lot of money trying to acquire and update White Pine and when you think about something to attract people and a company, having something like this on the lake probably 5-7 miles from White Pine would be a big selling point for a prospective new manufacturer or whoever goes there. He stated he thinks it is an excellent project. Patrick Hogan asked if the marina was preexisting. Charlie Breuer stated yes. He stated a small portion of the 25 acres has been utilized as a marina. He stated a majority of the property is like a park. He stated there is room for about 75 boats in the marina which has been operated over the past year. Patrick Hogan asked if there are plans to improve the marina. Charlie Breuer stated there are plans to improve the marina but the plans have not been submitted yet. Patrick Hogan asked if the project has been through the Planning and Zoning Board. Charlie Breuer stated the site plan was approved in 2018. Patrick Hogan asked about the traffic egress and asked if that has been dealt with. Charlie Breuer stated yes and a traffic study was provided which showed minimal impact. He stated it was acceptable to the Planning Board. 6 Page9 Victor Ianno stated we are spending a lot of money trying to acquire and update White Pine and when you think about something to attract people and a company, having something like this on the lake probably 5-7 miles from White Pine would be a big selling point for a prospective new manufacturer or whoever goes there. He stated he thinks it is an excellent project. Patrick Hogan asked if the marina was preexisting. Charlie Breuer stated yes. He stated a small portion of the 25 acres has been utilized as a marina. He stated a majority of the property is like a park. He stated there is room for about 75 boats in the marina which has been operated over the past year. Patrick Hogan asked if there are plans to improve the marina. Charlie Breuer stated there are plans to improve the marina but the plans have not been submitted yet. Patrick Hogan asked if the project has been through the Planning and Zoning Board. Charlie Breuer stated the site plan was approved in 2018. Patrick Hogan asked about the traffic egress and asked if that has been dealt with. Charlie Breuer stated yes and a traffic study was provided which showed minimal impact. He stated it was acceptable to the Planning Board. 6 Page9 Patrick Hogan asked if there was a study done regarding the desire for this type of apartment building. Charlie Breuer stated yes and with the vacancy rate in the north part of Onondaga County, they feel there is a need and going to be more of a need with all the good things the County has been luring to the area. Patrick Hogan asked if the price range is $1,000 to $1,800. Charlie Breuer stated that is the range. He stated the average would be $1,300 to $1,400 consistent with some of the rents in the newer apartment buildings in the area. Patrick Hogan read a letter from Tim Burtis, Onondaga County Legislator-3rd District, in support of the Trey Jay Loso project. Patrick Hogan stated as a member of the City Council he has voted on housing before and certainly as a member of OCIDA. He stated this is not in a distressed area and it is in a community that already exists so he has no problem with the sales and use tax, the transfer or the mortgage recording taxes but he is going to think about the real property. He asked if they are asking for a 10 year PILOT agreement. Charlie Breuer stated yes. Patrick Hogan stated he would like to hear from local officials because that will directly affect the tax base and the revenue in that area. Steve Morgan stated he thinks it is a great project. Patrick Hogan stated he thinks it is a great project but he may have an issue with the PILOT Agreement. Patrick Hogan asked if there was a study done regarding the desire for this type of apartment building. Charlie Breuer stated yes and with the vacancy rate in the north part of Onondaga County, they feel there is a need and going to be more of a need with all the good things the County has been luring to the area. Patrick Hogan asked if the price range is $1,000 to $1,800. Charlie Breuer stated that is the range. He stated the average would be $1,300 to $1,400 consistent with some of the rents in the newer apartment buildings in the area. Patrick Hogan read a letter from Tim Burtis, Onondaga County Legislator-3rd District, in support of the Trey Jay Loso project. Patrick Hogan stated as a member of the City Council he has voted on housing before and certainly as a member of OCIDA. He stated this is not in a distressed area and it is in a community that already exists so he has no problem with the sales and use tax, the transfer or the mortgage recording taxes but he is going to think about the real property. He asked if they are asking for a 10 year PILOT agreement. Charlie Breuer stated yes. Patrick Hogan stated he would like to hear from local officials because that will directly affect the tax base and the revenue in that area. Steve Morgan stated he thinks it is a great project. Patrick Hogan stated he thinks it is a great project but he may have an issue with the PILOT Agreement. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the Trey Jay at Loso, LLC project. Motion was carried. Janice Herzog returned to the meeting. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the Trey Jay at Loso, LLC project. Motion was carried. Janice Herzog returned to the meeting. ULTRA DAIRY, LLC EASEMENT CONSENT Robert Petrovich stated Ultra Dairy has done several projects and we are in lease leaseback arrangements on some of them. He stated WEP is doing sewer improvements there and this is 7 Page10 consent to grant an easement so that access can be achieved for sewer improvements. He stated this action is to provide the Board’s authorization for Robert Petrovich to execute that easement. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the execution of an easement for the Ultra Dairy, LLC project. Motion was carried. ULTRA DAIRY, LLC EASEMENT CONSENT Robert Petrovich stated Ultra Dairy has done several projects and we are in lease leaseback arrangements on some of them. He stated WEP is doing sewer improvements there and this is 7 Page10 consent to grant an easement so that access can be achieved for sewer improvements. He stated this action is to provide the Board’s authorization for Robert Petrovich to execute that easement. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the execution of an easement for the Ultra Dairy, LLC project. Motion was carried. ROTH STEEL UPDATE Robert Petrovich stated we have tried a number of different approaches regarding redevelopment of the Roth Steel site. He stated as we start to take a dive into the issues related to the contamination principally governing the redevelopment, it always gets to a certain point and the development projects pivot away because of the financial risk and uncertainty with contamination and ultimately the cost associated on how to clean it up. He stated we are now looking at pursuing a strategy to embark on cleaning up the Roth Steel site via the IDA and once we obtain a certificate of completion from the DEC we would be in a position to solicit proposals for redevelopment for a site that would be unencumbered by the stigma and the real issues of contamination as they exist out there. He stated the site is contaminated with PCBs and principally our remediation will be removal of the PCB and the contaminated soil and placement of clean fill on top of that. He stated staff has been working with JMT as the consultants on this effort and the overall schedule is to achieve an outcome that a year from now and hopefully by the end of quarter 1 of 2022 we have remediated the site and have a certificate of completion. He stated we would then be in a position in the spring construction season of 2022 to move forward with a redevelopment. He stated we are going to work concurrently on remediation and redevelopment and be in a position to solicit redevelopment proposals for the site. He stated there is discussion about turning the site into athletic fields as a possible end use. He stated it has a little bit of a journey but we are working diligently to try to bring it to a conclusion and ultimately having something on the site besides the remnants of an old scrap yard. ROTH STEEL UPDATE Robert Petrovich stated we have tried a number of different approaches regarding redevelopment of the Roth Steel site. He stated as we start to take a dive into the issues related to the contamination principally governing the redevelopment, it always gets to a certain point and the development projects pivot away because of the financial risk and uncertainty with contamination and ultimately the cost associated on how to clean it up. He stated we are now looking at pursuing a strategy to embark on cleaning up the Roth Steel site via the IDA and once we obtain a certificate of completion from the DEC we would be in a position to solicit proposals for redevelopment for a site that would be unencumbered by the stigma and the real issues of contamination as they exist out there. He stated the site is contaminated with PCBs and principally our remediation will be removal of the PCB and the contaminated soil and placement of clean fill on top of that. He stated staff has been working with JMT as the consultants on this effort and the overall schedule is to achieve an outcome that a year from now and hopefully by the end of quarter 1 of 2022 we have remediated the site and have a certificate of completion. He stated we would then be in a position in the spring construction season of 2022 to move forward with a redevelopment. He stated we are going to work concurrently on remediation and redevelopment and be in a position to solicit redevelopment proposals for the site. He stated there is discussion about turning the site into athletic fields as a possible end use. He stated it has a little bit of a journey but we are working diligently to try to bring it to a conclusion and ultimately having something on the site besides the remnants of an old scrap yard. Patrick Hogan asked if staff will be working with allies at state government regarding the possible grants funding. Robert Petrovich stated staff will be doing that as well as with federal partners. 8 Page11 Victor Ianno asked if the property is listed with any of the site locators. Robert Petrovich stated not with specific individuals. He stated we do have a LoopNet account and the site is out there and known. He stated in the past staff has been aggressive in trying to market it for redevelopment but the problem is once we get to a certain point, with the financial uncertainty everyone goes to a different location or doesn’t pursue the project. He stated we are hamstrung because of the contamination on the property. Victor Ianno asked if it would make any sense if it was listed with the caption of the Agency will partner if a company sees an interest in the property’s raw state. Robert Petrovich stated it is a strategy that was tried without success so he thinks we need to take a different approach because otherwise we are just going to be repeating the same thing. Patrick Hogan asked if staff will be working with allies at state government regarding the possible grants funding. Robert Petrovich stated staff will be doing that as well as with federal partners. 8 Page11 Victor Ianno asked if the property is listed with any of the site locators. Robert Petrovich stated not with specific individuals. He stated we do have a LoopNet account and the site is out there and known. He stated in the past staff has been aggressive in trying to market it for redevelopment but the problem is once we get to a certain point, with the financial uncertainty everyone goes to a different location or doesn’t pursue the project. He stated we are hamstrung because of the contamination on the property. Victor Ianno asked if it would make any sense if it was listed with the caption of the Agency will partner if a company sees an interest in the property’s raw state. Robert Petrovich stated it is a strategy that was tried without success so he thinks we need to take a different approach because otherwise we are just going to be repeating the same thing. Kevin Ryan asked if staff is going to be soliciting proposals to engage in the remediation of the site. Robert Petrovich stated staff worked with a firm prior to his time as executive director that provided services related to demolition and some removal at the site. Nate Stevens stated in 2018 a firm demolished the buildings and removed barrels from around the site but there are still the building slabs and contamination in the ground and on the property. Robert Petrovich stated that in reviewing with counsel, counsel felt that the RFP and the contract was stale enough that we should reissue an RFP for just the removal of contamination from the property which is going to happen once a remedial design is completed, probably sometime in the summer. Kevin Ryan asked before starting the process of asking for the proposals does staff have in mind a ball park as to how much we anticipate this is going to set us back to engage in this work. Robert Petrovich stated the cost is in the range of around $800,000-$900,000, potentially up to $1,000,000, to remediate the site. Kevin Ryan asked if staff is going to be soliciting proposals to engage in the remediation of the site. Robert Petrovich stated staff worked with a firm prior to his time as executive director that provided services related to demolition and some removal at the site. Nate Stevens stated in 2018 a firm demolished the buildings and removed barrels from around the site but there are still the building slabs and contamination in the ground and on the property. Robert Petrovich stated that in reviewing with counsel, counsel felt that the RFP and the contract was stale enough that we should reissue an RFP for just the removal of contamination from the property which is going to happen once a remedial design is completed, probably sometime in the summer. Kevin Ryan asked before starting the process of asking for the proposals does staff have in mind a ball park as to how much we anticipate this is going to set us back to engage in this work. Robert Petrovich stated the cost is in the range of around $800,000-$900,000, potentially up to $1,000,000, to remediate the site. Kevin Ryan stated Roth Steel has been on our books for a long time and we always knew there were environmental issues. He stated it is not surprising the issues brought to the table today and not being able to sell it. He stated anything we can do to move on from this project would be great and he is in full support of what the Board wants to do. He stated we just need to find a way to clean this up. He stated it is a great piece of property sitting right on the lake and if we can make it viable and productive again that would be an excellent end use for this process. 9 Page12 Patrick Hogan stated that property was going to be another junk yard before OCIDA negotiated for the property. He stated by the positive action by, at that time, the Chair of the County Legislature, now the County Executive, that we ended up obtaining the property and preserving it. He stated it will be an asset to the community at large. Robert Petrovich agreed and stated other investments made in and around the Roth site are impressive. He stated to the extent the Agency can over the next 12-14 months get this property back online with a higher and better use, it is going to enhance all the other activities that have been occurring in and around the Roth site on the micro level and on macro level such as the bridge construction, the Loop the Lake Trail and completion of those projects as well. Kevin Ryan stated Roth Steel has been on our books for a long time and we always knew there were environmental issues. He stated it is not surprising the issues brought to the table today and not being able to sell it. He stated anything we can do to move on from this project would be great and he is in full support of what the Board wants to do. He stated we just need to find a way to clean this up. He stated it is a great piece of property sitting right on the lake and if we can make it viable and productive again that would be an excellent end use for this process. 9 Page12 Patrick Hogan stated that property was going to be another junk yard before OCIDA negotiated for the property. He stated by the positive action by, at that time, the Chair of the County Legislature, now the County Executive, that we ended up obtaining the property and preserving it. He stated it will be an asset to the community at large. Robert Petrovich agreed and stated other investments made in and around the Roth site are impressive. He stated to the extent the Agency can over the next 12-14 months get this property back online with a higher and better use, it is going to enhance all the other activities that have been occurring in and around the Roth site on the micro level and on macro level such as the bridge construction, the Loop the Lake Trail and completion of those projects as well. Kevin Ryan stated it was the right thing to do at the time stopping it from becoming another junk yard and it is the right thing to do now to move it out and make it usable again. Kevin Ryan stated it was the right thing to do at the time stopping it from becoming another junk yard and it is the right thing to do now to move it out and make it usable again. EXECUTIVE SESSION/LEGAL ADVICE Jeff Davis stated he would like to make a recommendation for a motion to enter into executive session pursuant to Public Officer’s Law Section 105H to discuss a proposed acquisition of 4 parcels public discussion of which would substantially affect the value of that land. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board went into executive session at 8:59 am. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board adjourned executive session and entered regular session at 9:29 am. Motion was carried. (Steve Morgan and Fanny Villarreal left the meeting.) EXECUTIVE SESSION/LEGAL ADVICE Jeff Davis stated he would like to make a recommendation for a motion to enter into executive session pursuant to Public Officer’s Law Section 105H to discuss a proposed acquisition of 4 parcels public discussion of which would substantially affect the value of that land. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board went into executive session at 8:59 am. Motion was carried. Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board adjourned executive session and entered regular session at 9:29 am. Motion was carried. (Steve Morgan and Fanny Villarreal left the meeting.) PURCHASE CONTRACT EXECUTION Jeff Davis stated there are two motions before the Board and the first is a SEQR resolution. He stated he will read pertinent parts from it. He stated there are four SEQR resolutions before the 10 Page13 Board and the Board will do one vote for all four. He stated they are nearly identical resolutions and the only change being the address for the properties. He stated the Agency is desiring to purchase property from sellers pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale. He stated pursuant to SEQR the Agency is required to make a determination with respect to environmental impacts on any Type I or unlisted action. He stated a short EAF has been prepared by the Agency to aid in the determination with regard to the acquisition to the property and whether that acquisition may have a significant effect upon the environment. He stated this action is limited just to the acquisition of the land and the property by the Agency. He stated the Agency does not have a project before it concerning the use of the property. He stated the Agency has no current or proposed plans to develop the property. He stated the Agency currently has no project before it. He stated consideration of potential impact associated with future development would be purely speculative. He stated should the property be made available for future development at that time and in the future when a project is known, it would undergo a complete and thorough environmental review pursuant to SEQR. He stated based on the examination of the EAF the acquisition of the four properties in front of the Broad, each one of the acquisitions, is an unlisted action under SEQR. He stated each one of the acquisitions does not direct any subsequent development or commit the Agency to any future actions. He stated any potential future development were to occur would be dependent on environmental conditions or other factors that are currently unknown to the Agency. He stated in the Agency’s review of the acquisition, our review is no less protective of the environment since any future potential future development of the property would undergo a thorough environmental review pursuant to SEQR at that time. He stated according the Agency acting as lead agency is hereby determining that the acquisition of the lands will have a significant effect on the environment and the Agency will not require the preparation of environmental impact statements with respect to the project. He stated as a consequence to the foregoing the Agency has prepared a negative declaration with respect to the project, that project being the acquisition of each one of the four parcels. He stated there are four separate negative declaration resolutions in front of the Board. He stated he thinks it is appropriate to take a resolution authorizing agency counsel and the Executive Director to execute and work through the appropriate distribution of a negative declaration for the acquisition of each one of these four parcels. PURCHASE CONTRACT EXECUTION Jeff Davis stated there are two motions before the Board and the first is a SEQR resolution. He stated he will read pertinent parts from it. He stated there are four SEQR resolutions before the 10 Page13 Board and the Board will do one vote for all four. He stated they are nearly identical resolutions and the only change being the address for the properties. He stated the Agency is desiring to purchase property from sellers pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale. He stated pursuant to SEQR the Agency is required to make a determination with respect to environmental impacts on any Type I or unlisted action. He stated a short EAF has been prepared by the Agency to aid in the determination with regard to the acquisition to the property and whether that acquisition may have a significant effect upon the environment. He stated this action is limited just to the acquisition of the land and the property by the Agency. He stated the Agency does not have a project before it concerning the use of the property. He stated the Agency has no current or proposed plans to develop the property. He stated the Agency currently has no project before it. He stated consideration of potential impact associated with future development would be purely speculative. He stated should the property be made available for future development at that time and in the future when a project is known, it would undergo a complete and thorough environmental review pursuant to SEQR. He stated based on the examination of the EAF the acquisition of the four properties in front of the Broad, each one of the acquisitions, is an unlisted action under SEQR. He stated each one of the acquisitions does not direct any subsequent development or commit the Agency to any future actions. He stated any potential future development were to occur would be dependent on environmental conditions or other factors that are currently unknown to the Agency. He stated in the Agency’s review of the acquisition, our review is no less protective of the environment since any future potential future development of the property would undergo a thorough environmental review pursuant to SEQR at that time. He stated according the Agency acting as lead agency is hereby determining that the acquisition of the lands will have a significant effect on the environment and the Agency will not require the preparation of environmental impact statements with respect to the project. He stated as a consequence to the foregoing the Agency has prepared a negative declaration with respect to the project, that project being the acquisition of each one of the four parcels. He stated there are four separate negative declaration resolutions in front of the Board. He stated he thinks it is appropriate to take a resolution authorizing agency counsel and the Executive Director to execute and work through the appropriate distribution of a negative declaration for the acquisition of each one of these four parcels. Patrick Hogan asked if there will be one resolution. Jeff Davis stated the first resolution is the SEQRA resolution and would be one vote by the Board to issue a negative declaration for the acquisition of each one of the four parcels. 11 Page14 Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution issuing a negative declaration for each of the four proposed land acquisition resolutions. Motion was carried. Jeff Davis stated the second resolution is a resolution authorizing the Executive Director to enter into the four purchase and sale contracts and any related documents with respect to the four parcels that the Agency intends to acquire. Upon a motion by Kevin Ryan, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the Executive Director to enter into the four purchase and sale contracts and any related documents with respect to four parcels of property. Motion was carried. Patrick Hogan added the Payment of Bills included the grant reimbursements for the local businesses. Upon a motion by Kevin Ryan, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board adjourned the meeting at 9:35 am. Motion was carried. _________________________________ Nancy Lowery, Secretary Patrick Hogan asked if there will be one resolution. Jeff Davis stated the first resolution is the SEQRA resolution and would be one vote by the Board to issue a negative declaration for the acquisition of each one of the four parcels. 11 Page14 Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution issuing a negative declaration for each of the four proposed land acquisition resolutions. Motion was carried. Jeff Davis stated the second resolution is a resolution authorizing the Executive Director to enter into the four purchase and sale contracts and any related documents with respect to the four parcels that the Agency intends to acquire. Upon a motion by Kevin Ryan, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the Executive Director to enter into the four purchase and sale contracts and any related documents with respect to four parcels of property. Motion was carried. Patrick Hogan added the Payment of Bills included the grant reimbursements for the local businesses. Upon a motion by Kevin Ryan, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board adjourned the meeting at 9:35 am. Motion was carried. _________________________________ Nancy Lowery, Secretary 12 Page15 12 Page15 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 333 WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 130, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 PHONE: 315.435.3770 • FAX: 315.435.3669 March 31, 2021 2021 Budget Current YTD Revenue / Expense / Income Current Period Current YTD Amount Change to Budget Operating Revenue 98,000 174,732 1,646,000 (1,471,268) Administrative Expense 43,326 99,128 1,008,000 (908,872) Operating/Program Exp. 72,675 92,919 638,000 (545,081) Net Ordinary Income (18,002) (17,315) - (17,315) ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 333 WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 130, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 PHONE: 315.435.3770 • FAX: 315.435.3669 March 31, 2021 2021 Budget Current YTD Revenue / Expense / Income Current Period Current YTD Amount Change to Budget Operating Revenue 98,000 174,732 1,646,000 (1,471,268) Administrative Expense 43,326 99,128 1,008,000 (908,872) Operating/Program Exp. 72,675 92,919 638,000 (545,081) Net Ordinary Income (18,002) (17,315) - (17,315) Current Assets Current YTD Prior YTD Total Cash 4,421,117 2,825,604 Less Pass Through Received 32,766 25,750 Available Cash 4,388,352 2,799,854 Receivables (less pass through rec.) 281,020 1,845,914 Grant Reimbursements - 268,733 Total 4,669,372 4,914,501 Reserve for Contracts County Operations 2021 908,872 333 W. Washington St 2021 Rent 65,000 OBG WPCP CO #4 Additional Studies 442,248 JMT 800 Hiawatha Engineering 12,806 Barclay Damon WPCP Options 100,000 Total 1,528,927 Receivables 0-120 days 58,996 > 120 days 222,024 Total 281,020 Page16 Current Assets Current YTD Prior YTD Total Cash 4,421,117 2,825,604 Less Pass Through Received 32,766 25,750 Available Cash 4,388,352 2,799,854 Receivables (less pass through rec.) 281,020 1,845,914 Grant Reimbursements - 268,733 Total 4,669,372 4,914,501 Reserve for Contracts County Operations 2021 908,872 333 W. Washington St 2021 Rent 65,000 OBG WPCP CO #4 Additional Studies 442,248 JMT 800 Hiawatha Engineering 12,806 Barclay Damon WPCP Options 100,000 Total 1,528,927 Receivables 0-120 days 58,996 > 120 days 222,024 Total 281,020 Page16 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Profit and Loss March 2021 TOTAL Income 500 Operating Revenue 2116 Fees 2116.1 Agency Fees 95,415.00 2116.2 Application Fees 1,000.00 Total 2116 Fees 96,415.00 2410 Lease Income 1,500.00 Total 500 Operating Revenue 97,915.00 501 Non-Operating Revenue 2401 Interest Income 84.51 Total 501 Non-Operating Revenue 84.51 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 529 PILOT Income 44,792.85 Total 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 44,792.85 Total Income $142,792.36 GROSS PROFIT $142,792.36 Expenses 6400 Operating Expense 6407 Administrative Expense 43,326.26 6408 Meeting Expenses 75.94 6410 Office Expense 321.54 6412 Other Operating Expense 6412.1 COVID-19 Grants 40,284.46 Total 6412 Other Operating Expense 40,284.46 Total 6400 Operating Expense 84,008.20 6440 Legal Fees 6450 Barclay Damon 6460 IDA General Legal 4,126.76 6480 Roth Legal 525.00 Total 6450 Barclay Damon 4,651.76 Total 6440 Legal Fees 4,651.76 6500 Agency Program Expenses 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 6511 WPCP Closing Costs 27,341.07 Total 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 27,341.07 Total 6500 Agency Program Expenses 27,341.07 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 6605.2 PILOT Expense 44,792.84 Total 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 44,792.84 Total 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 44,792.84 Total Expenses $160,793.87 NET OPERATING INCOME $ -18,001.51 NET INCOME $ -18,001.51 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Profit and Loss March 2021 TOTAL Income 500 Operating Revenue 2116 Fees 2116.1 Agency Fees 95,415.00 2116.2 Application Fees 1,000.00 Total 2116 Fees 96,415.00 2410 Lease Income 1,500.00 Total 500 Operating Revenue 97,915.00 501 Non-Operating Revenue 2401 Interest Income 84.51 Total 501 Non-Operating Revenue 84.51 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 529 PILOT Income 44,792.85 Total 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 44,792.85 Total Income $142,792.36 GROSS PROFIT $142,792.36 Expenses 6400 Operating Expense 6407 Administrative Expense 43,326.26 6408 Meeting Expenses 75.94 6410 Office Expense 321.54 6412 Other Operating Expense 6412.1 COVID-19 Grants 40,284.46 Total 6412 Other Operating Expense 40,284.46 Total 6400 Operating Expense 84,008.20 6440 Legal Fees 6450 Barclay Damon 6460 IDA General Legal 4,126.76 6480 Roth Legal 525.00 Total 6450 Barclay Damon 4,651.76 Total 6440 Legal Fees 4,651.76 6500 Agency Program Expenses 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 6511 WPCP Closing Costs 27,341.07 Total 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 27,341.07 Total 6500 Agency Program Expenses 27,341.07 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 6605.2 PILOT Expense 44,792.84 Total 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 44,792.84 Total 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 44,792.84 Total Expenses $160,793.87 NET OPERATING INCOME $ -18,001.51 NET INCOME $ -18,001.51 Page17 Accrual Basis Wednesday, April 7, 2021 11:37 AM GMT-04:00 1/1 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2021 TOTAL ASSETS Current Assets Bank Accounts 200 Cash 0.00 200.1 Cash - M & T Checking 3,539,681.92 200.2 Cash - M & T Money Maker Savings 890,343.22 200.4 Destiny USA Restricted Cash -8,957.82 210 Petty Cash 50.00 Total 200 Cash 4,421,117.32 Total Bank Accounts $4,421,117.32 Accounts Receivable 380 Accounts Rec. 380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 71,024.04 Total 380 Accounts Rec. 71,024.04 Total Accounts Receivable $71,024.04 Other Current Assets 391 Long Tern Receivable 222,024.00 Total Other Current Assets $222,024.00 Total Current Assets $4,714,165.36 Page17 Accrual Basis Wednesday, April 7, 2021 11:37 AM GMT-04:00 1/1 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2021 TOTAL ASSETS Current Assets Bank Accounts 200 Cash 0.00 200.1 Cash - M & T Checking 3,539,681.92 200.2 Cash - M & T Money Maker Savings 890,343.22 200.4 Destiny USA Restricted Cash -8,957.82 210 Petty Cash 50.00 Total 200 Cash 4,421,117.32 Total Bank Accounts $4,421,117.32 Accounts Receivable 380 Accounts Rec. 380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 71,024.04 Total 380 Accounts Rec. 71,024.04 Total Accounts Receivable $71,024.04 Other Current Assets 391 Long Tern Receivable 222,024.00 Total Other Current Assets $222,024.00 Total Current Assets $4,714,165.36 Page18 Accrual Basis Wednesday, April 7, 2021 11:38 AM GMT-04:00 1/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2021 TOTAL Fixed Assets 100 Land 101 White Pines Commerce Park 2,070,401.50 101.1 WPCP GEIS 101.101 CHA GEIS 1 267,452.05 101.102 CHA GEIS 2 219,439.36 101.104 GEIS Reg Plan Board Overview 19,797.74 Total 101.1 WPCP GEIS 506,689.15 101.2 WPCP Legal 69,774.25 101.3 Engineering Services 52,675.00 101.301 Temporary Access 4,055.44 101.4 Environmental/Demo Services 10,318.98 Total 101.3 Engineering Services 67,049.42 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 101.501 Land Purchases 1,160,063.57 101.502 Closing Costs 3,168.14 Total 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 1,163,231.71 Total 101 White Pines Commerce Park 3,877,146.03 106 North Salina Properties 0.00 106.1 435 North Salina 17,083.55 106.3 435 North Salina Building 634,421.53 Total 106 North Salina Properties 651,505.08 107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42 Total 100 Land 5,133,491.53 104 Machinery & Equipment 104.1 Office Furniture 1,429.00 104.2 Equipment 1,432.40 Total 104 Machinery & Equipment 2,861.40 211 A/D Office Furniture -2,862.00 213 A/D Buildings -81,335.00 Total Fixed Assets $5,052,155.93 Other Assets 240 Blue Sky Redevelopment 1,641.76 Total Other Assets $1,641.76 TOTAL ASSETS $9,767,963.05 Page18 Accrual Basis Wednesday, April 7, 2021 11:38 AM GMT-04:00 1/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2021 TOTAL Fixed Assets 100 Land 101 White Pines Commerce Park 2,070,401.50 101.1 WPCP GEIS 101.101 CHA GEIS 1 267,452.05 101.102 CHA GEIS 2 219,439.36 101.104 GEIS Reg Plan Board Overview 19,797.74 Total 101.1 WPCP GEIS 506,689.15 101.2 WPCP Legal 69,774.25 101.3 Engineering Services 52,675.00 101.301 Temporary Access 4,055.44 101.4 Environmental/Demo Services 10,318.98 Total 101.3 Engineering Services 67,049.42 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 101.501 Land Purchases 1,160,063.57 101.502 Closing Costs 3,168.14 Total 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 1,163,231.71 Total 101 White Pines Commerce Park 3,877,146.03 106 North Salina Properties 0.00 106.1 435 North Salina 17,083.55 106.3 435 North Salina Building 634,421.53 Total 106 North Salina Properties 651,505.08 107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42 Total 100 Land 5,133,491.53 104 Machinery & Equipment 104.1 Office Furniture 1,429.00 104.2 Equipment 1,432.40 Total 104 Machinery & Equipment 2,861.40 211 A/D Office Furniture -2,862.00 213 A/D Buildings -81,335.00 Total Fixed Assets $5,052,155.93 Other Assets 240 Blue Sky Redevelopment 1,641.76 Total Other Assets $1,641.76 TOTAL ASSETS $9,767,963.05 Page19 Accrual Basis Wednesday, April 7, 2021 11:38 AM GMT-04:00 2/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2021 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Liabilities Current Liabilities Other Current Liabilities 600 Accounts Payable 0.00 600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 99,127.77 600.205 Exp Pay Prev Period 87,138.76 600.206 Mileage Reimbursement 92.34 600.208 BlueRock Energy Agreement Deposit 25,000.00 600.209 Syracuse Rail Overpayment 500.00 Total 600 Accounts Payable 211,858.87 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 603 PILOT Pass Thru 12,028.04 604 Other Pass Thrus 74,063.70 Total 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 86,091.74 631 Due to Other Governments 631.3 Schools 631.305 Baldwinsville 1.00 631.356 Syracuse 14,547.88 Total 631.3 Schools 14,548.88 631.4 Onondaga County 9,723.26 631.5 City of Syracuse 8,493.64 Total 631 Due to Other Governments 32,765.78 Total Other Current Liabilities $330,716.39 Total Current Liabilities $330,716.39 Total Liabilities $330,716.39 Equity 3900 Equity Unreserved 6,735,894.07 3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 2,345,838.63 463 Reserve For Contracts 1,528,926.50 465 Equity - Unreserved -1,156,097.50 Net Income -17,315.04 Total Equity $9,437,246.66 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $9,767,963.05 Page19 Accrual Basis Wednesday, April 7, 2021 11:38 AM GMT-04:00 2/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2021 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Liabilities Current Liabilities Other Current Liabilities 600 Accounts Payable 0.00 600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 99,127.77 600.205 Exp Pay Prev Period 87,138.76 600.206 Mileage Reimbursement 92.34 600.208 BlueRock Energy Agreement Deposit 25,000.00 600.209 Syracuse Rail Overpayment 500.00 Total 600 Accounts Payable 211,858.87 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 603 PILOT Pass Thru 12,028.04 604 Other Pass Thrus 74,063.70 Total 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 86,091.74 631 Due to Other Governments 631.3 Schools 631.305 Baldwinsville 1.00 631.356 Syracuse 14,547.88 Total 631.3 Schools 14,548.88 631.4 Onondaga County 9,723.26 631.5 City of Syracuse 8,493.64 Total 631 Due to Other Governments 32,765.78 Total Other Current Liabilities $330,716.39 Total Current Liabilities $330,716.39 Total Liabilities $330,716.39 Equity 3900 Equity Unreserved 6,735,894.07 3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 2,345,838.63 463 Reserve For Contracts 1,528,926.50 465 Equity - Unreserved -1,156,097.50 Net Income -17,315.04 Total Equity $9,437,246.66 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $9,767,963.05 Page20 Accrual Basis Wednesday, April 7, 2021 11:38 AM GMT-04:00 3/3 Page20 Accrual Basis Wednesday, April 7, 2021 11:38 AM GMT-04:00 3/3 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILL - SCHEDULE #454 April 13, 2021 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILL - SCHEDULE #454 April 13, 2021 GENERAL EXPENSES 1. BARCLAY DAMON LLP* $ 56,665.35 Land Purchase 2. BARCLAY DAMON LLP** $ 520,675.72 Land Purchase 3. RAMBOLL AMERICAS ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC. $ 23,300.50 Inv#1940004192, WPCP Engineering thru 1-31-21 4. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 126,688.20 Inv#5102168, 5103810, 5109067 & 5113981 WPCP Legal thru 2-28-21 5. BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC $ 3,450.75 Inv#19860734 & 19858378 BlueRock legal thru 2-28-21 6. PARK STRATEGIES, LLC $ 7,500.00 Inv#16583991, 16584149 & 16584221 1st Quarter 2021 Consulting Services 7. JMT OF NEW YORK, INC. $ 990.00 Inv#24-102595, Roth Brownfield Cleanup thru 1-31-21 8. ADVANCE MEDIA NEW YORK $ 196.00 Public Hearing Notices OYA Camillus A & B 9. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 693.75 Inv#5114129 Roth Brownfield thru 2-28-21 10. ONONDAGA CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. $ 15,804.09 1st Quarter 2021 Rent & Office Machine Payment GENERAL EXPENSES 1. BARCLAY DAMON LLP* $ 56,665.35 Land Purchase 2. BARCLAY DAMON LLP** $ 520,675.72 Land Purchase 3. RAMBOLL AMERICAS ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC. $ 23,300.50 Inv#1940004192, WPCP Engineering thru 1-31-21 4. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 126,688.20 Inv#5102168, 5103810, 5109067 & 5113981 WPCP Legal thru 2-28-21 5. BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC $ 3,450.75 Inv#19860734 & 19858378 BlueRock legal thru 2-28-21 6. PARK STRATEGIES, LLC $ 7,500.00 Inv#16583991, 16584149 & 16584221 1st Quarter 2021 Consulting Services 7. JMT OF NEW YORK, INC. $ 990.00 Inv#24-102595, Roth Brownfield Cleanup thru 1-31-21 8. ADVANCE MEDIA NEW YORK $ 196.00 Public Hearing Notices OYA Camillus A & B 9. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 693.75 Inv#5114129 Roth Brownfield thru 2-28-21 10. ONONDAGA CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. $ 15,804.09 1st Quarter 2021 Rent & Office Machine Payment 11. SYRACUSE DESIGN GROUP, LLC $ 360.00 2021 Web Site Hosting 1 Page21 Schedule #454 page 2 12. FEDEX $ 44.02 Inv#7-306-89522 & 7-313-00147 Shipping TOTAL $ 756,368.38 *Ratification of Check dated March 24, 2021 **Ratification of Check dated March 30, 2021 2 Page22 11. SYRACUSE DESIGN GROUP, LLC $ 360.00 2021 Web Site Hosting 1 Page21 Schedule #454 page 2 12. FEDEX $ 44.02 Inv#7-306-89522 & 7-313-00147 Shipping TOTAL $ 756,368.38 *Ratification of Check dated March 24, 2021 **Ratification of Check dated March 30, 2021 2 Page22 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILL - SCHEDULE #454 April 13, 2021 PILOT Payments 1. CITY OF SYRACUSE $ 8,493.64 1st Quarter 2021 COR IH Master PILOT Payment 2. SYRACUSE CSD $ 14,547.90 1st Quarter 2021 COR IH Master PILOT Payment 3. ONONDAGA COUNTY $ 9,723.26 1st Quarter 2021 COR IH Master PILOT Payment TOTAL $ 32,764.80 1 Page23 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILL - SCHEDULE #454 April 13, 2021 PILOT Payments 1. CITY OF SYRACUSE $ 8,493.64 1st Quarter 2021 COR IH Master PILOT Payment 2. SYRACUSE CSD $ 14,547.90 1st Quarter 2021 COR IH Master PILOT Payment 3. ONONDAGA COUNTY $ 9,723.26 1st Quarter 2021 COR IH Master PILOT Payment TOTAL $ 32,764.80 1 Page23 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESERVE FOR CONTRACTS 3/31/2021 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESERVE FOR CONTRACTS 3/31/2021 CONTRACT TOTAL PORTION BALANCE DESCRIPTION TERM CONTRACT PAID OUTSTANDING ONONDAGA COUNTY OED 2021 1-1-21-12-31-21 $1,008,000.00 $99,127.77 $908,872.23 333 W. WASHINGTON ST 2021 RENT 1-1-21-12-31-21 $65,000.00 $0.00 $65,000.00 OBG WPCP CO #4 ADDITIONAL STUDIES 11-30-18-12-31-21 $800,000.00 $357,752.13 $442,247.87 JMT 800 HIAWATHA ENGINEERING 2/13/19-12-31-21 $25,000.00 $12,193.60 $12,806.40 BARCLAY DAMON WPCP OPTIONS 11/30/20-12-31-21 $200,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $2,098,000.00 $569,073.50 $1,528,926.50 CONTRACT TOTAL PORTION BALANCE DESCRIPTION TERM CONTRACT PAID OUTSTANDING ONONDAGA COUNTY OED 2021 1-1-21-12-31-21 $1,008,000.00 $99,127.77 $908,872.23 333 W. WASHINGTON ST 2021 RENT 1-1-21-12-31-21 $65,000.00 $0.00 $65,000.00 OBG WPCP CO #4 ADDITIONAL STUDIES 11-30-18-12-31-21 $800,000.00 $357,752.13 $442,247.87 JMT 800 HIAWATHA ENGINEERING 2/13/19-12-31-21 $25,000.00 $12,193.60 $12,806.40 BARCLAY DAMON WPCP OPTIONS 11/30/20-12-31-21 $200,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $2,098,000.00 $569,073.50 $1,528,926.50 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 3/31/2021 AGENCY FEES RECEIVABLE $57,496.00 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE GENERAL $1,500.00 QUASI-EQUITY LOAN RECEIVABLE $0.00 GRANTS RECEIVABLE $0.00 LONG TERM RECEIVABLE $222,024.00 TOTAL $281,020.00 Page24 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Project Summary Draft 3/2/2021 1. Project Brolex Plank Road, LLC 2. Project Number 3101-21-03A 3. Location Clay 4. School District Cicero-North Syracuse School District 6. Project Type New Construction 5. Tax Parcel(s) 006.-04.18.0 Village North Syracuse ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 3/31/2021 AGENCY FEES RECEIVABLE $57,496.00 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE GENERAL $1,500.00 QUASI-EQUITY LOAN RECEIVABLE $0.00 GRANTS RECEIVABLE $0.00 LONG TERM RECEIVABLE $222,024.00 TOTAL $281,020.00 Page24 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Project Summary Draft 3/2/2021 1. Project Brolex Plank Road, LLC 2. Project Number 3101-21-03A 3. Location Clay 4. School District Cicero-North Syracuse School District 6. Project Type New Construction 5. Tax Parcel(s) 006.-04.18.0 Village North Syracuse 7.Total Project Cost $ 6,375,000.00 8. Total Jobs 2 Land $ 400,000 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ - 8B: Job Creation 2 Building $ 5,975,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ - Equipment Subject to NYS Production Exemption $ - Engineering/Architecture Fees $ - Financial Charges $ - Legal Fees $ - Other $ - Cost Benefit Analysis Brolex Plank Road, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Estimated Abatement Cost $242,250 Sales Tax Abatement $204,000 Mortgage Recording Tax Abatement $38,250 Real Property Tax Relief $0 7.Total Project Cost $ 6,375,000.00 8. Total Jobs 2 Land $ 400,000 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ - 8B: Job Creation 2 Building $ 5,975,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ - Equipment Subject to NYS Production Exemption $ - Engineering/Architecture Fees $ - Financial Charges $ - Legal Fees $ - Other $ - Cost Benefit Analysis Brolex Plank Road, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Estimated Abatement Cost $242,250 Sales Tax Abatement $204,000 Mortgage Recording Tax Abatement $38,250 Real Property Tax Relief $0 New Investment $9,155,070 PILOT Payments $0 Project Wages (10 years) $800,000 Two 24-unit apartment buildings located on an underutilized 2.3-acre parcel located in the Town Construction Wages $1,915,320 of Clay. Employee Benefits (10 years) $0 Project Capital Investment $6,375,000 Agency Fees $64,750 Benefit:Cost Ratio 37.79 :1 Page25 Page26 Page27 Page28 Page29 Page30 Page31 Page32 Page33 Page34 Page35 Page36 Page37 Page38 Page39 Page40 Page41 Page42 Page43 Page44 Page45 Page46 Page47 Page48 Page49 Page50 Brolex Plank Road, LLC Brolex Plank Road, LLC. 444 South Main Street North Syracuse, NY 13212 Office: (315) 656-7271 brandon@byoh.biz www.byohome.com Brolex Plank Road Vision Statement November 16th, 2020 Dear Chairman Hogan and OCIDA Members, We write to you to introduce our Plank Road two 24-unit apartment buildings located on an underutilized 2.3-acre parcel located at 444 South Main Street in the Village of North Syracuse, New York. New Investment $9,155,070 PILOT Payments $0 Project Wages (10 years) $800,000 Two 24-unit apartment buildings located on an underutilized 2.3-acre parcel located in the Town Construction Wages $1,915,320 of Clay. Employee Benefits (10 years) $0 Project Capital Investment $6,375,000 Agency Fees $64,750 Benefit:Cost Ratio 37.79 :1 Page25 Page26 Page27 Page28 Page29 Page30 Page31 Page32 Page33 Page34 Page35 Page36 Page37 Page38 Page39 Page40 Page41 Page42 Page43 Page44 Page45 Page46 Page47 Page48 Page49 Page50 Brolex Plank Road, LLC Brolex Plank Road, LLC. 444 South Main Street North Syracuse, NY 13212 Office: (315) 656-7271 brandon@byoh.biz www.byohome.com Brolex Plank Road Vision Statement November 16th, 2020 Dear Chairman Hogan and OCIDA Members, We write to you to introduce our Plank Road two 24-unit apartment buildings located on an underutilized 2.3-acre parcel located at 444 South Main Street in the Village of North Syracuse, New York. We are informed that this parcel has been vacant since the home was destroyed by fire about 25 years ago. It also is one of the very few parcels available in the Village which can accommodate new apartment housing for persons 55 years old and older. The existing apartment offerings are dated and not constructed within the 55-year-old and older community in mind. The revitalization of this vacant property to a new, walkable, amenity enhanced community will meet a demand for new housing but will also transition an underutilized vacant lot to a new amenity enhanced for the 55 year and older community. 1. Overall Description of project: ● (i) Each 24-unit complex is approximately 22,500 square feet for a total of 45,000 square feet. ● (ii) The size of the lot is 2.3 acres ● (iii) The lot is currently vacant. Upon completion of the project there will be two 24-unit apartment buildings ● (iv) This project will allow for new apartment housing for persons 55 years old and older ● (v) The revitalization of this vacant property to a new, walkable, amenity enhanced community will meet a demand for new housing but will also transition an underutilized vacant lot to a new amenity enhanced for the 55 year and older community. 2. Is the property being built on a blighted lot? Yes 11/16/2020 Page51 We are informed that this parcel has been vacant since the home was destroyed by fire about 25 years ago. It also is one of the very few parcels available in the Village which can accommodate new apartment housing for persons 55 years old and older. The existing apartment offerings are dated and not constructed within the 55-year-old and older community in mind. The revitalization of this vacant property to a new, walkable, amenity enhanced community will meet a demand for new housing but will also transition an underutilized vacant lot to a new amenity enhanced for the 55 year and older community. 1. Overall Description of project: ● (i) Each 24-unit complex is approximately 22,500 square feet for a total of 45,000 square feet. ● (ii) The size of the lot is 2.3 acres ● (iii) The lot is currently vacant. Upon completion of the project there will be two 24-unit apartment buildings ● (iv) This project will allow for new apartment housing for persons 55 years old and older ● (v) The revitalization of this vacant property to a new, walkable, amenity enhanced community will meet a demand for new housing but will also transition an underutilized vacant lot to a new amenity enhanced for the 55 year and older community. 2. Is the property being built on a blighted lot? Yes 11/16/2020 Page51 ● This 2.3-acre overgrown, vacant parcel has existed for 25 years since the former residence burned and was demolished due to structural and public safety concerns. ● The improvement of this overgrown, vacant, underutilized 2.3-acre parcel will visually enhance South Main Street for those driving by as well as those residents walking by this new community daily. 3. Is this new housing fulfilling an unmet need in the area? Yes. ● This 2.3-acre overgrown, vacant parcel has existed for 25 years since the former residence burned and was demolished due to structural and public safety concerns. ● The improvement of this overgrown, vacant, underutilized 2.3-acre parcel will visually enhance South Main Street for those driving by as well as those residents walking by this new community daily. 3. Is this new housing fulfilling an unmet need in the area? Yes. ● A professional evaluation of 55 year and older offerings in the County of Onondaga reveals there are 6 communities available to persons 55 years old and older including o Towne Center Retirement built in 2017 with 128 units 2 stories with full service and about a 15-mile distance from the subject o Morgan Square Apartments built in 2014 with 119 units 3 stories and being 14.3 miles from the subject o Buckley Square Apartments with 131 Units 2 stories built in 2011 being 8.7 miles distant from the subject o Snowbirds Landing 70 units built in 2004 3 stories and being 12.0 miles distant from the subject o Snowbirds Landing (Solvay) 73 units built in 2004 and being 11.4 miles distant from the subject. o Centerville Court Apartments 152 units 2 stories built in 1984 and being 8.7 miles from the subject. ● As can be seen from the above senior complexes none are close to our project located at 444 South Main Street in the Village of North Syracuse. ● The walkability for exercise and close proximity to goods and services as well as to churches and Village offerings fulfills a huge unmet need. ● The close proximity to Syracuse Hancock International Airport will allow those residents in our community who choose to travel south in the winter to do so with ease. ● A professional evaluation of 55 year and older offerings in the County of Onondaga reveals there are 6 communities available to persons 55 years old and older including o Towne Center Retirement built in 2017 with 128 units 2 stories with full service and about a 15-mile distance from the subject o Morgan Square Apartments built in 2014 with 119 units 3 stories and being 14.3 miles from the subject o Buckley Square Apartments with 131 Units 2 stories built in 2011 being 8.7 miles distant from the subject o Snowbirds Landing 70 units built in 2004 3 stories and being 12.0 miles distant from the subject o Snowbirds Landing (Solvay) 73 units built in 2004 and being 11.4 miles distant from the subject. o Centerville Court Apartments 152 units 2 stories built in 1984 and being 8.7 miles from the subject. ● As can be seen from the above senior complexes none are close to our project located at 444 South Main Street in the Village of North Syracuse. ● The walkability for exercise and close proximity to goods and services as well as to churches and Village offerings fulfills a huge unmet need. ● The close proximity to Syracuse Hancock International Airport will allow those residents in our community who choose to travel south in the winter to do so with ease. 4. Demand for Housing? Yes. ● The Village of North Syracuse in particular as well as the county of Onondaga are underserved by a new 55-year-old and older new amenity enhanced apartment complex. ● As the Village of North Syracuse community residents 55 years old and older seek to sell their homes it is critical that they have an opportunity to remain in our community. ● These 48 apartments help to fill that demand by providing amenities such as elevators, in apartment washing machines and dryers as well as walkability for exercise, restaurants and other goods and services. ● With the arrival of new jobs from BHG, SRC, Saab-Sensis, Lockheed Martin as well as Amazon and others all housing including our new community are critical. 5. Is there support from local officials? Yes. 11/16/2020 Page52 ● During our extensive planning process with the village zoning, planning and elected officials there has been uniform support. Letters can be obtained if needed. 4. Demand for Housing? Yes. ● The Village of North Syracuse in particular as well as the county of Onondaga are underserved by a new 55-year-old and older new amenity enhanced apartment complex. ● As the Village of North Syracuse community residents 55 years old and older seek to sell their homes it is critical that they have an opportunity to remain in our community. ● These 48 apartments help to fill that demand by providing amenities such as elevators, in apartment washing machines and dryers as well as walkability for exercise, restaurants and other goods and services. ● With the arrival of new jobs from BHG, SRC, Saab-Sensis, Lockheed Martin as well as Amazon and others all housing including our new community are critical. 5. Is there support from local officials? Yes. 11/16/2020 Page52 ● During our extensive planning process with the village zoning, planning and elected officials there has been uniform support. Letters can be obtained if needed. 6. Is there needed Infill in an already populated area? Yes. ● This new housing community consisting of 2 24-unit apartment buildings on an overgrown lot that has been underutilized for 25 years. ● In the Village at 444 South Main since the home burned and was demolished due to instability and public safety is a perfect example of infill. 7. Does the project provide walkability to Village centers? Yes. ● Our new community has immediate access to the South Main Street sidewalk network. ● Within close proximity there is the Gathering Place Church, St. Rose of Lima Church, Luther Memorial Lutheran Church, St. Rose of Lima School, Vincent’s Gourmet Imports Restaurant, Geddes Bakery and Pastry Shop, Plank Road Ice Cream, Bowling Green Lanes, Edward Jones Financial Advisor, Atwal Dental Care, Compassionate Family Medicines, and M&T Bank, Gulf Oil gas station, and Walgreens just to name just a few. We are eager to start this project at 444 South Main Street. We are now asking that you, Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency, support and accept our application so that we can have the opportunity to repurpose this vacant land and improve our community. Yours Truly, Brolex Plank Road, LLC Joshua H. Heintz Date: ______________ Member Brandon M. Jacobson Date: ______________ Member 11/16/2020 Page53 6. Is there needed Infill in an already populated area? Yes. ● This new housing community consisting of 2 24-unit apartment buildings on an overgrown lot that has been underutilized for 25 years. ● In the Village at 444 South Main since the home burned and was demolished due to instability and public safety is a perfect example of infill. 7. Does the project provide walkability to Village centers? Yes. ● Our new community has immediate access to the South Main Street sidewalk network. ● Within close proximity there is the Gathering Place Church, St. Rose of Lima Church, Luther Memorial Lutheran Church, St. Rose of Lima School, Vincent’s Gourmet Imports Restaurant, Geddes Bakery and Pastry Shop, Plank Road Ice Cream, Bowling Green Lanes, Edward Jones Financial Advisor, Atwal Dental Care, Compassionate Family Medicines, and M&T Bank, Gulf Oil gas station, and Walgreens just to name just a few. We are eager to start this project at 444 South Main Street. We are now asking that you, Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency, support and accept our application so that we can have the opportunity to repurpose this vacant land and improve our community. Yours Truly, Brolex Plank Road, LLC Joshua H. Heintz Date: ______________ Member Brandon M. Jacobson Date: ______________ Member 11/16/2020 Page53 Thomas M. Oot Date: ______________ Member 11/16/2020 Page54 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT 1 4 Thomas M. Oot Date: ______________ Member 11/16/2020 Page54 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT 1 4 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2 3 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2 3 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT 6 7 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT 5 8 PROPOSED 24 UNIT APARTMENT BLDG. TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN ARCHITECT P.C. 7515 Morgan Road NORTH SYRACUSE, NEW YORK SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Liverpool, NY 13090 Ph:315-472-9848 Fax:315-472-9876 Email: rwater@cdtcad.com Page55 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT 6 7 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT 5 8 PROPOSED 24 UNIT APARTMENT BLDG. TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN ARCHITECT P.C. 7515 Morgan Road NORTH SYRACUSE, NEW YORK SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Liverpool, NY 13090 Ph:315-472-9848 Fax:315-472-9876 Email: rwater@cdtcad.com Page55 GENERAL NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS & SITE PREPARATION NOTES SF CLL SF CLL SF SF CLL SF SF CLL SF SF GENERAL NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS & SITE PREPARATION NOTES SF CLL SF CLL SF SF CLL SF SF CLL SF SF ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY CLL F S CLL SF SF SF X CLL ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY CLL F S CLL SF SF SF X CLL LL C SF SF LL C SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF CL SF SF SF L SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF CL SF SF SF L SF SF SF SF SF SF SF X SF SF X G CL SF SF X SF SF X G CL EX L X SF SF X EX L X SF SF X G EX SF SF W X G EX SF SF W X EX SF X SF G EX EX SF X SF G EX W SF EX SF W SF EX SF SF G EX SF SF SF G EX SF SF SF SF SF SF REVISIONS W SF SF SF SF SF REVISIONS W SF EX SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF EX SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF G SF EX W SF Drawn By: SF G SF EX W SF Drawn By: EX Checked By: SF KFA Proj. No.: EX Checked By: SF KFA Proj. No.: Date: Scale: Title: Date: Scale: Title: SITE G EX PREPARATION 0 20 40 60 PLAN 1 L-100 SITE G EX PREPARATION 0 20 40 60 PLAN 1 L-100 L-100 SCALE IN FEET N Page56 EROSION CONTROL NOTES and EROSION CONTROL SEQUENCING EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: EROSION CONTROL and CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE L-100 SCALE IN FEET N Page56 EROSION CONTROL NOTES and EROSION CONTROL SEQUENCING EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: EROSION CONTROL and CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FINAL CLEAN UP & PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE SOIL RESTORATION NOTES SWPPP LEGEND TYPE OF SOIL DISTURBANCE SOIL RESTORATION REQUIREMENT SOIL RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS: TYPE OF SOIL DISTURBANCE SOIL RESTORATION REQUIREMENT SOIL RESTORATION PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION: FINAL CLEAN UP & PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE SOIL RESTORATION NOTES SWPPP LEGEND TYPE OF SOIL DISTURBANCE SOIL RESTORATION REQUIREMENT SOIL RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS: TYPE OF SOIL DISTURBANCE SOIL RESTORATION REQUIREMENT SOIL RESTORATION PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION: ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY CLL F S CLL ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY CLL F S CLL PA SF PA SF LA CE CT SF LA CE CT SF . S SF X CLL . S SF X CLL LL C SF SF LL C SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF CL S S SF SF SF L SF S S SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF CL S S SF SF SF L SF S S SF SF SF SF SF SF STOP SF X STOP SF X UD G G G G G G G SF ST G G G G G UD UD G UD UD UD UD UD PORCH PORCH UD UD G G G G G G G SF ST G G G G G UD UD G UD UD UD UD UD PORCH PORCH UD PORCH PORCH G SF X G PORCH PORCH G SF X G G UD CL G UD CL EX L G UD EX L G UD BLDG. #1 G X 7,482 SF BLDG. #2 G SF BLDG. #1 G X 7,482 SF BLDG. #2 G SF 24 UNITS 7,482 SF 24 UNITS SF 3 STORY G 3 STORY X 24 UNITS 7,482 SF 24 UNITS SF 3 STORY G 3 STORY X G G G EX ST U ST G D UD SF G EX ST U ST G D UD SF SF ST PORCH PORCH G SF ST PORCH PORCH G W ST ST PORCH PORCH X UD W ST ST PORCH PORCH X UD EX UD UD UD ST UD UD ST ST ST UD ST ST ST EX UD UD UD ST UD UD ST ST ST UD ST ST ST SF ST X SF ST X PARKING SF W W W UD ST ST PARKING SF W W W UD ST ST G ST ST ST ST ST G ST ST ST ST ST EX ST ST EX ST ST RE 11 ST ST UD ST RE 11 ST ST UD ST ET ST ET ST W ST SF W ST SF ST E UD W ST E UD W EX UD EX UD IN U T SF NO MA O UD IN U T SF NO MA O UD TH R SF W TH R SF W SO Y S G EX SF SF SO Y S G EX SF SF N SF N SF EX U SF SF SF REVISIONS EX U SF SF SF REVISIONS W SF SF W SF SF SF SF SF SF SF T SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF T SF SF SF SF SF SF G SF U/ SF G SF U/ EX E EX E W SF Drawn By: W SF Drawn By: EX Checked By: EX Checked By: SF KFA Proj. No.: SF KFA Proj. No.: Date: Scale: Date: Scale: Title: Title: G EROSION EX G EROSION EX CONTROL PLAN 0 20 40 60 1 L-101 CONTROL PLAN 0 20 40 60 1 L-101 L-101 SCALE IN FEET N Page57 L-101 SCALE IN FEET N Page57 SANITARY NOTES GRADING, DRAINAGE and UTILITIES NOTES SANITARY NOTES GRADING, DRAINAGE and UTILITIES NOTES DAILY WATER USE CLL CLL SAN MH #1 S CLL CLL DAILY WATER USE CLL CLL SAN MH #1 S CLL CLL ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY S CLL CLL ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY S CLL CLL PA LA CE CT . S X PA LA CE CT . S X CLL SAN MH #2 SAN MH #3 SAN MH #4 LL C CLL SAN MH #2 SAN MH #3 SAN MH #4 LL C CL S S L S S CL S S L S S STOP X STOP X UD ST G G G G G G G G G G G G UD UD G BIORETENTION UD UD UD UD UD AREA #2 PORCH PORCH UD UD ST G G G G G G G G G G G G UD UD G BIORETENTION UD UD UD UD UD AREA #2 PORCH PORCH UD PORCH PORCH G BIORETENTION X AREA #1 G G PORCH PORCH G BIORETENTION X AREA #1 G G UD CL UD CL EX L G UD EX L G UD FFE 420.00 FFE 420.00 G BLDG. #1 X FFE 420.00 FFE 420.00 G BLDG. #1 X FES 7,482 SF BLDG. #2 G 24 UNITS 7,482 SF 3 STORY 24 UNITS G 3 STORY X FES 7,482 SF BLDG. #2 G 24 UNITS 7,482 SF 3 STORY 24 UNITS G 3 STORY X LD-DB LD-DB G LD-DB LD-DB G G EX ST UD ST G UD G EX ST UD ST G UD ST PORCH PORCH W ST G ST PORCH X ST PORCH PORCH W ST G ST PORCH X PORCH EX UD UD UD UD UD UD ST PORCH EX UD UD UD UD UD UD ST ST ST 12" OUTLET STRUC. ST UD ST ST ST ST ST 12" OUTLET STRUC. ST UD ST ST ST ST SI X ST SI X PARKING UD W W W SI # ST ST PARKING UD W W W SI # ST ST G ST ST ST G ST ST ST EX ST ST ST ST EX ST ST ST ST RE 11 ST ST UD RE 11 ST ST UD ET ST W FES ST ET ST W FES ST ST E UD ST ST E UD ST EX UD W EX UD W IN U T NO MA O UD IN U T NO MA O UD H R REVISIONS H R REVISIONS S W S W G EX G EX SO Y EX UT N W SI # SI # T SO Y EX UT N W SI # SI # T Drawn By: G U/ Drawn By: G U/ EX Checked By: SI # E KFA Proj. No.: EX Checked By: SI # E KFA Proj. No.: Date: Date: W EX Scale: W EX Scale: Title: Title: GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITIES PLAN G EX GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITIES PLAN G EX 0 20 40 60 1 0 20 40 60 1 L-200 W L-200 N L-200 W L-200 N EX SCALE IN FEET Page58 UD EX SCALE IN FEET Page58 UD UD UD 6 L-201 UD UD UD UD 6 L-201 UD UD ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY ST ST ST UD ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY ST ST ST UD ST UD UD ST W ST ∅ ST UD UD ST W ST ∅ ST 4 5 W W L-201 L-201 ST 4 5 W W L-201 L-201 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 2 L-201 UD UD 0 10 20 30 X X ST 2 L-201 UD UD 0 10 20 30 X X SCALE IN FEET N X G G SCALE IN FEET N X G G UD UD G G X X G UD UD G G X X G G STEEL BOLLARD X X G 4 TOTAL G CONCRETE PAVEMENT X G STEEL BOLLARD X X G 4 TOTAL G CONCRETE PAVEMENT X UD HEAVY DUTY G UD HEAVY DUTY G G WASTE ENCLOSURE VINYL G X G G G WASTE ENCLOSURE VINYL G X G G G UD REVISIONS G UD REVISIONS ST ST ST ST ST ST ST UD UD ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST UD UD ST ST ST ST UD ST UD ST ST Drawn By: ST UD ST UD ST ST Drawn By: ST W Checked By: ST UD ST KFA Proj. No.: ST PARKING W Checked By: ST UD ST KFA Proj. No.: ST PARKING Date: ST ST Scale: 0 4 8 12 4 3 1 Title: L-201 SCALE INN FEET N L-201 L-201 PARTIAL 0 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 GRADING PLAN Date: ST ST Scale: 0 4 8 12 4 3 1 Title: L-201 SCALE INN FEET N L-201 L-201 PARTIAL 0 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 GRADING PLAN SCALE INN FEET N SCALE IN FEET N L-201 O Page59 SCALE INN FEET N SCALE IN FEET N L-201 O Page59 PLANT LIST ZONE DATA CHART - LAYOUT CONSTRUCTION NOTES VILLAGE OF NORTH SYRACUSE § CLL CLL PLANT LIST ZONE DATA CHART - LAYOUT CONSTRUCTION NOTES VILLAGE OF NORTH SYRACUSE § CLL CLL PLANT NOTES SIGN SCHEDULE PLANT NOTES SIGN SCHEDULE RESERVED PARKING S CLL RESERVED PARKING S CLL NO PARKING CLL NO PARKING CLL ANY TIME STOP S CLL ANY TIME STOP S CLL ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY CLL ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY CLL PA L AC E CT . S X PA L AC E CT . S X CLL LL C CLL LL C CL S S L S S CL S S L S S STOP X STOP X UD G G G G G G G ST G G G G G UD UD G UD UD UD UD UD PORCH PORCH UD UD G G G G G G G ST G G G G G UD UD G UD UD UD UD UD PORCH PORCH UD PORCH PORCH G X G G UD PORCH PORCH G X G G UD CL CL EX L G UD EX L G UD BLDG. #1 G X 7,482 SF BLDG. #2 G 24 UNITS 7,482 SF 3 STORY 24 UNITS G 3 STORY X BLDG. #1 G X 7,482 SF BLDG. #2 G 24 UNITS 7,482 SF 3 STORY 24 UNITS G 3 STORY X G G G EX ST U ST G D UD G EX ST U ST G D UD ST PORCH PORCH G W ST ST PORCH PORCH X UD ST PORCH PORCH G W ST ST PORCH PORCH X UD EX UD UD UD ST UD UD EX UD UD UD ST UD UD ST ST ST UD ST ST ST ST X ST ST ST UD ST ST ST ST X PARKING W W W UD ST ST PARKING W W W UD ST ST G ST ST ST ST ST 12 G ST ST ST ST ST 12 EX ST ST 26 EX ST ST 26 RE 11 ST ST UD ST RE 11 ST ST UD ST ET ST W ST ET ST W ST ST E UD W EX UD ST E UD W EX UD IN U T SETBACK LINE NO MA O UD IN U T SETBACK LINE NO MA O UD TH R 17 W TH R 17 W SO Y S G EX SO Y S G EX N EX U 17 N EX U 17 W REVISIONS T W REVISIONS T G U/ EX E G U/ EX E W EX Drawn By: W EX Drawn By: Checked By: KFA Proj. No.: Checked By: KFA Proj. No.: Date: Scale: Date: Scale: Title: Title: G EX LAYOUT AND G EX LAYOUT AND W PLANTING PLAN W PLANTING PLAN EX 0 20 40 60 1 EX 0 20 40 60 1 L-300 L-300 SCALE IN FEET N Page60 GM GAS METERS UTIL. BOX UTIL. BOX L-300 L-300 SCALE IN FEET N Page60 GM GAS METERS UTIL. BOX UTIL. BOX FRAME APARTMENT BUILDING PA 513 FRAME APARTMENT BUILDING PA 513 LA 24" CE LA 24" CE CRUSHED PR OP E RT CRUSHED PR OP E RT CT Y LIN CT Y LIN CM E CM E . ± . ± P BL AC INV415.9 KT ED OP GE OF PA SHED DR VE 508 ME 16" I VE NT W AY P BL AC INV415.9 KT ED OP GE OF PA SHED DR VE 508 ME 16" I VE NT W AY GN GN LE PO SI 528 LE PO SI 528 HT S 89°08'37" E HT S 89°08'37" E LIG 12" 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 481.43' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.8 LIG 12" 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 481.43' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.8 0.0 N1 3.1 2.1 1.3 0.0 N1 3.1 2.1 1.3 0.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 2.2 0.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 2.2 0.0 LIGHT POLE 1.3 2.3 3.1 3.7 N1 0.0 LIGHT POLE 1.3 2.3 3.1 3.7 N1 K AL 0.0 K AL 0.0 EW ID 0.7 1.0 0.9 2.0 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.0 EW ID 0.7 1.0 0.9 2.0 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.0 .S WM-2 .S WM-2 NC CO 0.0 NC CO 0.0 NT NT ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY ME 0.7 1.0 2.8 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.0 "CROSSWALK" ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY ME 0.7 1.0 2.8 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.0 "CROSSWALK" VE PA 0.0 0.0 VE PA 0.0 0.0 OF OF E E E E IN G 0.9 3.8 2.7 1.8 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 WM-2 IN G 0.9 3.8 2.7 1.8 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 WM-2 RL 0.0 RL 0.0 ED ED E NT 0.0 E NT 0.0 CE 1.2 WM 3.4 3.7 2.5 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.0 CE 1.2 WM 3.4 3.7 2.5 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.0 S 0.0 S 0.0 S 0.0 S 0.0 A R 1.0 3.0 3.4 2.7 2.1 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.7 A R 1.0 3.0 3.4 2.7 2.1 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.7 G 0.0 0.0 WM WM WM 0.9 1.5 3.5 3.2 2.5 1.9 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.6 G 0.0 0.0 WM WM WM 0.9 1.5 3.5 3.2 2.5 1.9 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.6 CT 0.0 WM-2 WM 0.0 WM 1.7 1.5 3.0 2.9 2.8 3.1 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.9 WM 3.3 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.2 0.8 CT 0.0 WM-2 WM 0.0 WM 1.7 1.5 3.0 2.9 2.8 3.1 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.9 WM 3.3 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.2 0.8 CT 0.0 0.0 WM CT 0.0 0.0 WM K 2.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 3.2 3.5 3.0 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.0 K 2.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 3.2 3.5 3.0 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.0 AL EW 0.0 AL EW 0.0 ID .S 0.0 ID .S 0.0 NC 2.3 2.9 3.4 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.0 3.1 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.8 NC 2.3 2.9 3.4 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.0 3.1 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.8 CO 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.1 3.8 3.6 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.2 0.9 CO 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.1 3.8 3.6 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.2 0.9 NT NT RE 11 0' "CURVE" RE 11 0' "CURVE" ME 0.0 ME 0.0 ET 0.0 0.0 ET 0.0 0.0 VE VE 20 PA 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 3.0 3.3 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.0 20 PA 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 3.0 3.3 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.0 IN T E OF CT CT IN T E OF CT CT E S E S GE 0.0 GE 0.0 LIN S 0.0 LIN S 0.0 D A D A ER ER ST ER E R ST ER E R NT NT MA U G 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.8 2.3 2.5 2.1 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.7 MA U G 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.8 2.3 2.5 2.1 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.7 CE LD 0.0 CE LD 0.0 OU O 0.0 OU O 0.0 W SH W SH 0" 0" UT R 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.7 "NO PARK" UT R 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.7 "NO PARK" 9'4 0.0 9'4 0.0 °3 0.0 °3 0.0 33 CT 33 CT H SO S 0.0 0.1 H SO S 0.0 0.1 S 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 1.3 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 S 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 1.3 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y 141 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6" APP 0.0 0.0 Y 141 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6" APP 0.0 0.0 N 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 14 0.0 0.0 418.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 WF 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 14 0.0 0.0 418.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 WF 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E LIN 0.0 0.0 E LIN 0.0 0.0 ER 0.0 ER 0.0 NT "HWY. #" NT "HWY. #" CE 0.0 0.0 UT & O ILITY VE PO CE 0.0 0.0 UT & O ILITY VE PO TE RH LE EA TE RH LE EA RE DU T RE DU T NC IL. NC IL. CO CO NT ME Luminaire Schedule NT ME Luminaire Schedule VE PA OF GE ED Symbol Qty Label Arrangement LLF Description Lum. Watts VE PA OF GE ED Symbol Qty Label Arrangement LLF Description Lum. Watts 8 WM SINGLE 0.950 NV-1-T4-32L-1-40K-ASA-WM @ 27' MTG.HT 106 2 N1 SINGLE 0.950 CAL-S-T2-16L-7-40K-HSS-SINGLE @ 15' MTG.HT 36 8 WM SINGLE 0.950 NV-1-T4-32L-1-40K-ASA-WM @ 27' MTG.HT 106 2 N1 SINGLE 0.950 CAL-S-T2-16L-7-40K-HSS-SINGLE @ 15' MTG.HT 36 3 WM-2 SINGLE 0.950 NV-1-T4-16L-53-40K-ASA-WM @ 16' MTG.HT 28 3 WM-2 SINGLE 0.950 NV-1-T4-16L-53-40K-ASA-WM @ 16' MTG.HT 28 REVISIONS REVISIONS Calculation Summary 444 S MAIN Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min NLS LIGHTING SPILL Illuminance Fc 0.00 0.1 0.0 N.A. N.A. REV 3 WHOLE LOT Illuminance Fc 1.78 3.8 0.5 3.56 7.60 7/14/20 Drawn By: Calculation Summary 444 S MAIN Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min NLS LIGHTING SPILL Illuminance Fc 0.00 0.1 0.0 N.A. N.A. REV 3 WHOLE LOT Illuminance Fc 1.78 3.8 0.5 3.56 7.60 7/14/20 Drawn By: Checked By: Checked By: KFA Proj. No.: KFA Proj. No.: Date: Date: Scale: Scale: Title: Title: LIGHTING PLAN 0 20 40 60 1 LIGHTING PLAN 0 20 40 60 1 L-301 L-301 SCALE IN FEET N L-301 L-301 SCALE IN FEET N Page61 9 L-500 27 CE L-500 CT 15 4 L-500 L-500 20 8 L-500 L-500 14 L-500 Page61 9 L-500 27 CE L-500 CT 15 4 L-500 L-500 20 8 L-500 L-500 14 L-500 ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY 7 L-500 23 L-500 19 L-500 26 L-500 13 L-500 3 L-500 18 L-500 25 L-500 PLAN ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY 7 L-500 23 L-500 19 L-500 26 L-500 13 L-500 3 L-500 18 L-500 25 L-500 PLAN 12 L-500 6 17 L-500 L-500 2 L-500 22 L-500 SECTIONS 12 L-500 6 17 L-500 L-500 2 L-500 22 L-500 SECTIONS REVISIONS SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN CROSSING 11 L-500 Drawn By: Checked By: KFA Proj. No.: Date: PARALLEL SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN Scale: Title: · REVISIONS SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN CROSSING 11 L-500 Drawn By: Checked By: KFA Proj. No.: Date: PARALLEL SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN Scale: Title: · DETAILS · · 24 21 16 10 5 1 L-500 L-500 L-500 L-500 L-500 L-500 L-500 Page62 Ø 9 L-501 8 L-501 11 L-501 DETAILS · · 24 21 16 10 5 1 L-500 L-500 L-500 L-500 L-500 L-500 L-500 Page62 Ø 9 L-501 8 L-501 11 L-501 ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY 7 L-501 5 S L-501 ∅ 6 L-501 4 L-501 2 L-501 ROUTE 11 APARTMENTS 444 S. MAIN ST.,NORTH SYRACUSE, NY 7 L-501 5 S L-501 ∅ 6 L-501 4 L-501 2 L-501 REVISIONS CONTROL JOINT TYP. REVISIONS CONTROL JOINT TYP. 7 CONCRETE PAD - L-500 HEAVY DUTY 10 6' HT. PRIVACY L-501 FENCE (PVC) CONTROL JOINT TYP. 4 STEEL BOLLARD Drawn By: L-501 W/ COVER TYP. (3' HT.) Checked By: KFA Proj. No.: Date: Scale: 7 CONCRETE PAD - L-500 HEAVY DUTY 10 6' HT. PRIVACY L-501 FENCE (PVC) CONTROL JOINT TYP. 4 STEEL BOLLARD Drawn By: L-501 W/ COVER TYP. (3' HT.) Checked By: KFA Proj. No.: Date: Scale: Title: Title: DETAILS 3 1 L-501 L-501 L-501 Page63 Page64 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. DETAILS 3 1 L-501 L-501 L-501 Page63 Page64 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the DSSOLFDQWRUproject sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A. Project and $SSOLFDQWSponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Route 11 Apartments Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): 444 S. Main St. North Syracuse, NY 13212 Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): New construction of (3) Multi-family residential buildings with approximately 60 units. A 90 parking space lot will be constructed along with utilities, stormwater management, and green space. Waste enclosures will be constructed and provided for residents. A proposed drive is located along S. Main St. and will relocate the existing curb cut. NYSDOT permit is required for the new driveway access. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: (315) 559-0556 Brolex Properties, LLC E-Mail: Address: 5912 N. Burdick St. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the DSSOLFDQWRUproject sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A. Project and $SSOLFDQWSponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Route 11 Apartments Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): 444 S. Main St. North Syracuse, NY 13212 Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): New construction of (3) Multi-family residential buildings with approximately 60 units. A 90 parking space lot will be constructed along with utilities, stormwater management, and green space. Waste enclosures will be constructed and provided for residents. A proposed drive is located along S. Main St. and will relocate the existing curb cut. NYSDOT permit is required for the new driveway access. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: (315) 559-0556 Brolex Properties, LLC E-Mail: Address: 5912 N. Burdick St. City/PO: Manlius State: Zip Code: NY 13057 Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: (315) 445-7980 Keplinger Freeman Associates E-Mail: Address: 6320 Fly Rd. Suite 109 City/PO: State: Zip Code: East Syracuse NY 13057 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: 444 South Main Street, LLC E-Mail: Address: 6709 Brooklawn Pkwy City/PO: State: Zip Code: Syracuse NY 13211 Page 1 of 13 Page65 City/PO: Manlius State: Zip Code: NY 13057 Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: (315) 445-7980 Keplinger Freeman Associates E-Mail: Address: 6320 Fly Rd. Suite 109 City/PO: State: Zip Code: East Syracuse NY 13057 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: 444 South Main Street, LLC E-Mail: Address: 6709 Brooklawn Pkwy City/PO: State: Zip Code: Syracuse NY 13211 Page 1 of 13 Page65 B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City&RXQVHOTown%RDUG,  Yes ✔  No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village ✔  Yes  No Village of North Syracuse Planning Commission 5/21/2020 Planning Board or Commission c. City Town or  Yes ✔  No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies  Yes ✔  No e. County agencies  Yes  No ✔ SOCPA 4/08/2020 f. Regional agencies ✔  Yes  No OCWA, OCWEP 5/21/2020 g. State agencies ✔  Yes  No NYSDOT, NYSDEC 5/21/2020 h. Federal agencies  Yes ✔  No B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City&RXQVHOTown%RDUG,  Yes ✔  No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village ✔  Yes  No Village of North Syracuse Planning Commission 5/21/2020 Planning Board or Commission c. City Town or  Yes ✔  No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies  Yes ✔  No e. County agencies  Yes  No ✔ SOCPA 4/08/2020 f. Regional agencies ✔  Yes  No OCWA, OCWEP 5/21/2020 g. State agencies ✔  Yes  No NYSDOT, NYSDEC 5/21/2020 h. Federal agencies  Yes ✔  No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway?  Yes ✔  No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program?  Yes ✔  No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area?  Yes ✔  No C. Planning and Zoning i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway?  Yes ✔  No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program?  Yes ✔  No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area?  Yes ✔  No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the  Yes ✔  No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? x If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. x If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site ✔  Yes  No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ✔  Yes  No would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway  Yes ✔  No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the  Yes ✔  No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? x If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. x If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site ✔  Yes  No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ✔  Yes  No would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway  Yes ✔  No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan,  Yes ✔  No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 13 Page66 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ✔  Yes  No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ C-2: Commercial _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan,  Yes ✔  No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 13 Page66 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ✔  Yes  No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ C-2: Commercial _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ✔  Yes  No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse - Cicero School District b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse Police Dept. c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse Fire Dept. b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ✔  Yes  No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse - Cicero School District b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse Police Dept. c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse Fire Dept. d. What parks serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Lonergran Park __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? Multi-Family Residential _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? _____________ 2.39 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? _____________ 2.39 acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _____________ XXXX acres d. What parks serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Lonergran Park __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? Multi-Family Residential _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? _____________ 2.39 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? _____________ 2.39 acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _____________ XXXX acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use?  Yes  No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? ✔ No  Yes  If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed?  Yes  No iii. Number of lots proposed? ________ iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ H Will WKHproposed action be constructed in multiple phases?  Yes ✔ No L If No, anticipated period of construction: _____ months LL If Yes: x Total number of phases anticipated _____ x Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year x Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year x Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use?  Yes  No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? ✔ No  Yes  If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed?  Yes  No iii. Number of lots proposed? ________ iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ H Will WKHproposed action be constructed in multiple phases?  Yes ✔ No L If No, anticipated period of construction: _____ months LL If Yes: x Total number of phases anticipated _____ x Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year x Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year x Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 13 Page67 f. Does the project include new residential uses? ✔  Yes  No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ 54 At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ 54 Page 3 of 13 Page67 f. Does the project include new residential uses? ✔  Yes  No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ 54 At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ 54 g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any  Yes  No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ Stormwater Management ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water:  Ground water  Surface water streams ✔  Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Stormwater iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________TBD million gallons; surface area: ____________ TBD acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Earth Fill g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any  Yes  No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ Stormwater Management ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water:  Ground water  Surface water streams ✔  Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Stormwater iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________TBD million gallons; surface area: ____________ TBD acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Earth Fill D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both?  Yes ✔  No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? x Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ x Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials?  Yes  No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting?  Yes  No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both?  Yes ✔  No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? x Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ x Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials?  Yes  No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting?  Yes  No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment  Yes ✔ No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 Page68 b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment  Yes ✔ No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 Page68 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will WKHproposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes  No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will WKHproposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation?  Yes  No If Yes: x aFUHV of DTXDWLFvegetation proposed to be removed ___________________________________________________________ x H[SHFWHG acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion________________________________________ x purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ x if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? ✔ Yes  No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ 13,200 gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ✔ Yes  No If Yes: x Name of district or service area: OCWA _________________________________________________________________________ x Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ✔ Yes  No x Is the project site in the existing district? ✔ Yes  No x Is expansion of the district needed?  Yes ✔  No x Do existing lines serve the project site? ✔ Yes  No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ✔  Yes  No If Yes: x Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site?  Yes ✔ No If, Yes: x Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ x Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ x Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), ZKDWLVWKHmaximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ✔ Yes  No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ 13,200 gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Sanitary Wastewater _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities?  Yes  No If Yes: x Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ Oak Orchard WWTP x Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ x Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ✔ Yes  No x Is the project site in the existing district? ✔ Yes  No x Is expansion of the district needed?  Yes ✔  No ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will WKHproposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes  No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will WKHproposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation?  Yes  No If Yes: x aFUHV of DTXDWLFvegetation proposed to be removed ___________________________________________________________ x H[SHFWHG acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion________________________________________ x purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ x if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? ✔ Yes  No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ 13,200 gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ✔ Yes  No If Yes: x Name of district or service area: OCWA _________________________________________________________________________ x Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ✔ Yes  No x Is the project site in the existing district? ✔ Yes  No x Is expansion of the district needed?  Yes ✔  No x Do existing lines serve the project site? ✔ Yes  No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ✔  Yes  No If Yes: x Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site?  Yes ✔ No If, Yes: x Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ x Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ x Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), ZKDWLVWKHmaximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ✔ Yes  No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ 13,200 gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Sanitary Wastewater _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities?  Yes  No If Yes: x Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ Oak Orchard WWTP x Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ x Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ✔ Yes  No x Is the project site in the existing district? ✔ Yes  No x Is expansion of the district needed?  Yes ✔  No Page 5 of 13 Page69 x Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ✔  Yes  No x Will Dline extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project?  Yes ✔ No If Yes: x Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site?  Yes ✔ No If Yes: x Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ x Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ x What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 13 Page69 x Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ✔  Yes  No x Will Dline extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project?  Yes ✔ No If Yes: x Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site?  Yes ✔ No If Yes: x Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ x Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ x What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point ✔  Yes  No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ Roof Leader Runoff, _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On-Site Stormwater Management Facility - ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ x If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties?  Yes ✔ No iv. Does WKHproposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater?  Yes ✔  No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel  Yes ✔ No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit,  Yes ✔  No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet  Yes  No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Nitrous Oxide (N22) x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of HydrofloXrocarbons (H)&V) x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point ✔  Yes  No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ Roof Leader Runoff, _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On-Site Stormwater Management Facility - ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ x If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties?  Yes ✔ No iv. Does WKHproposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater?  Yes ✔  No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel  Yes ✔ No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit,  Yes ✔  No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet  Yes  No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Nitrous Oxide (N22) x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of HydrofloXrocarbons (H)&V) x ___________Tons/year (VKRUWWRQV) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 6 of 13 Page70 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants,  Yes ✔ No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as  Yes ✔  No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 13 Page70 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants,  Yes ✔ No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as  Yes ✔  No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial  Yes ✔  No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): † Morning † Evening †Weekend † Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/dayDQGW\SH HJVHPLWUDLOHUVDQGGXPSWUXFNV BBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB LLL Parking spaces: Existing _____________BBBBBBProposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________BBBBBBBB LY 'RHVWKHSURSRVHGDFWLRQLQFOXGHDQ\VKDUHGXVHSDUNLQJ"6 feet Page 10 of 13 Page74 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses?  Yes ✔  No x If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ x Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ x Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ x Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ x Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place?  Yes  No x Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ >6 feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________ NgA __________% 53.6 ___________________________ AlB __________% 34.8 ____________________________ MtA __________% 11.6 d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ 1 feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________ NgA __________% 53.6 ___________________________ AlB __________% 34.8 ____________________________ MtA __________% 11.6 d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ 1 feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: ✔  Well Drained: _____% 34.8 of Vite  Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site ✔  Poorly Drained _____% 65.2 of Vite f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ✔  0-10%: _____% 100 of site  10-15%: _____% of site  15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers,  Yes ✔  No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site?  Yes ✔  No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal,  Yes ✔  No state or local agency? iv. For each identified UHJXODWHGwetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information x Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ ‡ Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ t Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________ Approximate Size ___________________ ‡ Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired ✔ No  Yes  waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Is the project site in a designatedFloodway?  Yes ✔  No j. Is the project site in the 100year Floodplain?  Yes ✔  No k. Is the project site in the 500year Floodplain?  Yes ✔  No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Drainage status of project site soils: ✔  Well Drained: _____% 34.8 of Vite  Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site ✔  Poorly Drained _____% 65.2 of Vite f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ✔  0-10%: _____% 100 of site  10-15%: _____% of site  15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site?  Yes ✔  No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers,  Yes ✔  No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site?  Yes ✔  No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal,  Yes ✔  No state or local agency? iv. For each identified UHJXODWHGwetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information x Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ ‡ Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ t Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________ Approximate Size ___________________ ‡ Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired ✔ No  Yes  waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Is the project site in a designatedFloodway?  Yes ✔  No j. Is the project site in the 100year Floodplain?  Yes ✔  No k. Is the project site in the 500year Floodplain?  Yes ✔  No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 13 Page75 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ ______________________________ Deer _______________________________ Birds ______________________________ ______________________________ Squirrels _______________________________ ______________________________ Insects n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Extent of community/habitat: x Currently: ______________________ acres x Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres x Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres Page 11 of 13 Page75 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ ______________________________ Deer _______________________________ Birds ______________________________ ______________________________ Squirrels _______________________________ ______________________________ Insects n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community?  Yes ✔  No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Extent of community/habitat: x Currently: ______________________ acres x Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres x Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as  Yes ✔  No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? ,I