April 2023 — 4-13-23-OCIDA-Board-Packet-reduced.pdf =================================================== ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 335 MONTGOMERY STREET FLOOR 2M, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 1- PHONE: 315.435.3770  FAX: 315.435.3669  ONGOVED.COM Regular Meeting Agenda April 13, 2023 8:30 AM Call to Order the Regular Meeting of the Agency A. Approval of Minutes: March 23, 2023 B. Treasurer’s Report C. Payment of Bills D. Conflict of Interest Action Items: 1. Welcome New OCIDA Board Members Cydney Johnson and Elizabeth Dreyfuss Representative: Patrick Hogan, Chair, OCIDA Board 2. RPNY Solar 4, LLC (3101-23-01A) Second Meeting RPNY Solar 4, LLC is proposing a 2.75MW community solar energy generating facility that will be located on approximately 12.4 acres of a 41.9 acre parcel in the Village of Minoa. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes and mortgage recording taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes, sales and use taxes and mortgage recording taxes. Representative: Anthony Bell, Permitting Manager, RPNY Solar 4, LLC Page1 3. PBFF Drakes LLC (3101-23-02A) Initial Meeting PBFF Drakes LLC is proposing to construct a residential apartment complex on an approximately 22.1 acre parcel which complex will consist of six (6) three-story apartment buildings totaling approximately 34,000 square feet and containing twenty-seven (27) apartments and sixty garages. The project will also include the construction of a clubhouse totaling approximately 3,000 square feet for use by the residents, a maintenance building totaling approximately 2,000 square feet and tweleve disconnected buildings each containing five (5) garages. The applicant is requesting exemptions from, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes, sales and use taxes and mortgage recording taxes. Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board to authorize a public hearing. Representative: Tim Fitzgerald, PBFF Drake’s Legal Counsel, Harris Beach 4. Engineering Services-Contract Authorization Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board authorizing a contract with Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. in an amount of $ 193,600 for engineering services and support in connections with White Pine Commerce Park. Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA 5. YMCA of Greater Syracuse, Inc. Project (3101-02-08A) (Modification Meeting Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Tax-Exempt Variable Rate Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (YMCA of Greater Syracuse, Inc. Project, Series 2003A (Reissued) Agency Action Requested: a. A resolution of the Board approving certain Bond modifications. Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA Adjourn 2 Page2 DRAFT Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Regular Meeting Minutes March 23, 2023 A regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 335 Montgomery Street, Syracuse, New York in the large conference room Floor 2M. Patrick Hogan called the meeting to order at 8:34 am with the following: PRESENT: Patrick Hogan Janice Herzog Susan Stanczyk Kevin Ryan ABSENT: Fanny Villarreal ALSO PRESENT: Robert M. Petrovich, Executive Director Nate Stevens, Treasurer Nancy Lowery, Secretary Svetlana Dyer, Assistant Secretary Karen Doster, Recording Secretary Alexis Rodriguez, Assistant Treasurer Len Rauch, Economic Development Jeff Davis, Barclay Damon Law Firm Amanda Fitzgerald, Barclay Damon Law Firm Matthew Pelligra, Office of Economic Development Mike Lisson, Grossman St. Amour Breanah Lane, Grossman St. Amour Rich Dausman, Cryomech, Inc. Ilari Savola, Bluefors Cryocooler Technologies Paul Reichel, Bond Schoeneck & King Anthony Bell, RPNY Solar 4, LLC Rob Panasci, RPNY Solar 4, LLC Stephanie Loucas, RPNY Solar 4, LLC Jake Clay, RPNY Solar 4, LLC Michelle Molinet, J.W. Didado Electric, LLC John Sidd, Hancock & Estabrook Christine Stevens, VIP Structures JoAnne Getman, VIP Structures Ken Bush, County Legislature Rick Moriarty, Post Standard Matt Mulcahey, Channel 3 News Dennis Harmor, Channel 9 News Conor Wright, Channel 9 News Chris Bianchi, Syracuse City School District APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – FEBRUARY 9, 2023 Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved the regular meeting minutes of February 9, 2023. Motion was carried. TREASURER’S REPORT Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of February 2023. Patrick Hogan stated there are several PILOT payments to the municipalities and asked for a separate report on the money sent out to the different entities. Nate Stevens stated yes. Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved the Treasurer’s Report for the month of January 2023. Motion was carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Payment of Bills Schedule #479. Janice Herzog asked about the $1,350 payment to the Downtown Committee of Syracuse. Robert Petrovich stated it is an annual membership in support of the Downtown Committee making sure they achieve their mission of making downtown vibrant and interesting. He stated we wanted to be supportive of that and have been supportive in the past. Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved the Payment of Bills Schedule #479 for $91,423.65 and PILOT payments to Onondaga County for $116,979.93, Village of Baldwinsville for $92,618.00, Town of Clay for $4,286.00, Town of Van Buren for $21,539.00, Town of DeWitt for $35,981.62, Town of Cicero for $4,227.00, Town of Lysander for $49,326.00, City of Syracuse for $2,040.96, Syracuse City School District for $7,389.73, North Syracuse School District for $26,251.00, Liverpool School District for $53,941.00, East Syracuse Minoa School District for $178,085.53, Baldwinsville School District for $328,643.00, Town of Lafayette for $2,908.00, Lafayette School District for $$9475.00, Onondaga County for $15,864.00, City of Syracuse for $7,475.00, City of Syracuse School District for $13,998.00, Town of Salina for $4,584.00, Village of Liverpool for $4,538.00 and Liverpool School District for $31,677.00. Motion was carried. 2 CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE The Conflict of Interest was circulated and there were no conflicts reported. AUDIT FROM GROSSMAN ST. AMOUR Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved the 2022 Audit of the Agency. Motion was carried. CRYOMECH, INC. (3101-19-0A2) MODIFICATION MEETING Robert Petrovich stated Cryomech has been before the Board on many occasions expanding, growing and doing a great job in the space of cryogenic computing. He stated they have been a great business in the community and supportive of everything we are trying to do with respect to White Pine and Micron. He stated we are very pleased to have them here this morning. Rich Dausman introduced Ilari Savola with Bluefors. He stated Cryomech is in the process of being acquired by Bluefors, a Finnish company who started in 2008 and has been a partner of theirs for 15 years. He stated currently they are about 400 employees and are integral in quantum computing which is what is spurring the growth at Bluefors as well as Cryomech. He stated Cryomech is a sole supplier to Bluefors. He stated it is a partnership in their opinion that will really guarantee them another 60 years of manufacturing here in Syracuse, Town of DeWitt. He stated they are going to be a great partner and they are excited about their future. Patrick Hogan asked if Cryomech is before the Board today because they are required to inform the IDA Board on a new partnership. Robert Petrovich stated yes and said it is the title as well as codifying and blessing the transaction between Cryomech and Bluefors. He stated the Agency has a lease/leaseback and benefit package with Cryomech that Bluefors is going to take over. Jeff Davis stated items 2 and 3 on the agenda are both for Cryomech. He stated item 2 on the agenda is the 2019 project that has already closed on the lease/leaseback transaction and item 3 on the agenda the Board recently approved but that lease transaction has not yet closed so we are doing this as two separate resolutions. 3 Robert Petrovich stated item 3 on the agenda is the latest expansion by Cryomech. Janice Herzog asked if the Cryomech team they already have will all stay in place. Rich Dausman stated the entire leadership team stays in place and nothing really changes from their plans for the future for growth. He stated it is business as usual. Susan Stanczyk asked if they expect any expansions. Rich Dausman stated yes and right now they are pushing the building out and adding another 35,000 square feet. He stated they are currently 76,000 square feet. He stated they purchased the land behind them so they have room to grow even further. He stated Bluefors has a large customer base in the US so they will probably have service, stock room and spare parts. He stated further out there has been some high level discussions of possibly bringing some manufacturing from Finland to the US but that is to be determined. He stated their biggest struggle is finding people to join them. Janice Herzog asked if there was an employee increase with the expansion. Rich Dausman stated yes. He stated they are at 171 employees now and have 24 job openings. Nate Stevens stated the October 2022 project had employment goals of retention of 166 jobs and creation of 15 jobs. Janice Herzog asked if there is still the common goal of local labor. Rich Dausman stated yes. Janice Herzog stated this transition is a great testament to what they have done with the company and it’s exciting. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution consenting to the sale and assignment of the right, title and interest in a certain project facility by Cryomech, Inc. to Bluefors Cryocooler Technologies Inc. Motion was carried. CRYOMECH, INC. (3101-22-08A) MODIFICATION MEETING Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution approving the sale and assignment of the right, title and interest in a certain project facility by Cryomech, Inc. to Bluefors Cryocooler Technologies Inc. Motion was carried. 4 RPNY SOLAR 4, LLC (3101-21-15B) Anthony Bell stated RPNY Solar 4 is proposing a 2.75 megawatt AC community solar project in the Village of Minoa, Town of Manlius. He stated they have obtained all of their local approvals from the jurisdictions. He stated they went through a planned development district (PDD) process for the local zoning and that was approved the end of last year. He stated they have all their permits and entitlements for their building permits which they are in the process of applying for in the next few months. He stated they have obtained their PILOT support letters from the town, village, county and East Syracuse School District as part of the application requirements. He stated this project is hopeful to start construction on Q2 of this year. Patrick Hogan stated this is not RPNY’s first project across the country. Anthony Bell stated they have a portfolio north of 60 megawatts and active projects across the country. He stated in New York alone they have 2 active projects, 3 under construction or starting construction very soon and another 6 along various stages of development. Patrick Hogan asked if the company is based out of San Francisco. Anthony Bell stated the company’s headquarters is in San Francisco but he is not from San Francisco. Patrick Hogan asked if the company manages all the projects. Anthony Bell stated they are an owner-operator so they develop, construct and operate through the life of the project. He stated they are not a solar developer who gets entitlements and approvals then sells to a construction company and operator. He stated they own and operate all the projects in their portfolio. Patrick Hogan asked if the company is assuring the Board that they are using local labor for this project. Anthony Bell stated yes. Patrick Hogan stated if an issue comes up and you can’t find local labor then you come before the Board for a waiver. Anthony Bell stated they are aware, fully committed to adhering to that policy and an attestation letter was signed by the president and founder to that affect. He stated he believes what happened last time they were before the Board was an unfortunate misstep on their part where they tried to communicate too much too early before they had actually done any of their labor due diligence. He stated they were trying to be transparent and forthright before 5 they understood anything. He stated they have learned from that and their current labor and materials sourcing is still undergoing but it is his understanding from talking to their prime EPC contact that it is going very well on the local labor front. Robert Petrovich stated he wants to make sure the applicant is aware that the Agency is very keyed in because there are construction jobs but there are no permanent jobs and we always find that to be a source of concern. He stated every project has construction jobs and the fact that solar projects don’t have permanent jobs, it is even more important to make sure the local access policy is adhered to. He stated the Agency is not adverse to waivers but there needs to be a case made for a waiver that is compelling and not just that it’s difficult to find people. He stated the whole purpose of getting benefits from this Board is that local labor is used and skills and training are advanced to that labor shed so that they can grow and prosper as well. He stated he wants to make that point on the record. Anthony Bells stated understood. Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the RPNY Solar 4, LLC project. Motion was carried. Rob Panasci stated he is the attorney for the applicant and he has represented some of the developers in the past so he understands the waiver requirement. He stated a question they have for the Board is tree clearing and in order to meet some of the conditions for DEC there is a potential for bat habitat in this area. He stated you can only cut trees from November to March 31 and they want to start to start construction in Q2. He stated in order to do that they are asking for some consideration to allow for the applicant to cut trees before the approval. He stated they would like to cut some trees before an approval is made. Robert Petrovich stated there is a but- for provision and it is understood that minor earth work and very limited site prep in order to stage equipment has been looked upon as being ok in the past. He stated what needs to be explained to the Board is are they clear cutting the entire site or are they removing a couple of trees here and there. He stated that has a bearing on what the ask is. Jeff Davis asked if the Village of Minoa building permit says they can start tree clearing or not. He stated he understands they want to start construction in Q2 and asked if the building permit is a triggering item because that might be a start of construction that this Board needs to consider or is this site prep work done in advance that does not trigger a building permit at the local level and therefore falls in the category Mr. Petrovich was just saying. Rob Panasci stated they were only going to cut the trees and get them so they don’t have to worry about the bat habitat. He 6 stated there was going to be no other site prep done. He stated the idea was to make sure they were cut before bats can nest in there. Anthony Bell stated they forwarded a figure they prepared and of the proposed project area it is 14% or 1.8 acres of trees. He stated it is not the entire site and certainly not clear cutting. He stated the trees in question are thin, not dense so even the 1.8 acre is an over estimate. Robert Petrovich asked if they are operating near or within a designated wetland area to do this. Anthony Bell stated none of the areas are wetlands. Robert Petrovich stated he thinks we should take a deeper dive into this and his recommendation is not to take action on this and staff will follow up with counsel unless counsel feels we are in a position to grant it now. Jeff Davis stated it is not a request for a resolution being passed but he thinks it should be reviewed and get back to them. Rob Panasci asked what more can they provide to the Board. Jeff Davis stated as of now answering the question on what the position the Village of Minoa may be because they need the right building permit. Rob Panasci stated ok. Patrick Hogan asked Mr. Petrovich if there is a concern with the state. Robert Petrovich stated they are obviously looking for projects that would advance regardless of IDA benefits but the whole but-for conversation comes into focus and he would rather avoid that issue. Patrick Hogan stated he assumes the tree cutting company is not out of state. Anthony Bell stated no. J.W. DIDADO ELECTRIC, LLC (3101-21-15B) Robert Petrovich stated Barclay Damon is conflicted out and John Sidd is representing the Agency as conflict counsel. Michele Molinet stated they need a sales tax abatement increase because of material pricing escalations throughout the project from the beginning of exception until they are through with construction. 7 Patrick Hogan stated the Board has been hearing this from a lot of companies. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing an increase the J.W. Didado Electric, LLC Project sales and use exemption. Motion was carried. OPEN MEETINGS LAW – VIDEOCONFERENCING Jeff Davis stated at the last meeting it was discussed that the State has authorized participation of Boards by video conference. He stated the Board has always been able to participate or call in but they couldn’t vote. He stated now a board member can call in and vote on an action provided that certain things were done; A) there is a quorum of people in the room and B) there has to be an extraordinary circumstance as determined by the Chair, staff and counsel as to why that person is unable to attend. He stated an example is if somebody had Covid and wanted to participate in the meeting. He stated they can call in and if there is a quorum in the room they could vote and their vote would count towards the vote on the project. He stated in order to establish a policy to do that we had to go through the governance committee at the last meeting who reviewed it and referred it to the full board. He stated the public hearing was done and now the policy is back before the Board to adopt. He stated it is a tool in the tool chest the Board can utilize it consistent with what the state allows for participation. Nancy Lowery stated no one attended the public hearing and there were no comments. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the use of videoconferencing as permitted by Section 103-a of NYS Open Meetings Law. Motion was carried. HABITAT FOR HUMANITY Robert Petrovich stated there are a number of homes on Burnet Road the Agency owns as part of the preparation of White Pine for the Micron project. He stated we are at a juncture now where we are going to be advancing toward demolition of those homes during the construction season. He stated we are trying to facilitate a doing good opportunity by creating a path for Habitat for 8 Humanity to enter the property and take out certain doors, fixtures, windows, cabinetry etc. He stated they don’t demolish, take roofs off, remove siding or things like that but they can use and repurpose things for the community at a deep discount. He stated we wanted to create that opportunity for them to do that and in order to do that we need to put forward an explanatory statement that is pushed out for a 90 day waiting period. He stated once we get past the 90 days of notification we can then proceed with Habitat to effect that outcome. Jeff Davis stated we are dealing with the state statutes in terms of disposition of property that we own so we need to go through procedural steps to do that. He stated he is contacting Habitat for Humanity to do some of the steps that need to happen on that side. He stated this is the preliminary step that gets things rolling so we can make this a good deed. Patrick Hogan asked if we will require the Agency to be named as an additional insured by Habitat. Jeff Davis stated yes and Habitat typically has volunteer organizations that do volunteer days for Habitat for Humanity so they would be covered under insurance provisions through Habitat for Humanity. He stated they will go out and determine what houses they want to do. Patrick Hogan stated the Agency owns the houses and what is in them. Jeff Davis agreed. Patrick Hogan stated in essence we are gifting public property. Jeff Davis agreed and the Agency is disposing of materials in a way that is in essence a gift. Robert Petrovich stated having Habitat come in and take some of the materials out, the expectation is it will reduce our demolition cost because some of the material will already be gotten rid of through a deconstruction process with Habitat. He stated there will be less for the demolition contractor to take off site and dispose of. Patrick Hogan stated he knows it has to be done legally but there is no doubt Habitat for Humanity is a great organization and his inclination is let’s do it. Robert Petrovich stated to the extent we can do it within the guiderails of policy and statute, staff will do that. Kevin Ryan asked if there is an environmental survey on each property to see if there is any hazardous material or asbestos. Robert Petrovich stated it is a prerequisite of doing demolition in order to get the permit that you have done a pre demolition survey. Jeff Davis stated one of the 9 resolutions the Board passed was authorizing steps to engage with a contractor to do a scope of work to do that exact thing. Kevin Ryan stated he thinks we should do this because we need to get things done and if there is a 90 day waiting period to satisfy the requirements, let’s move it. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing preparation and transmittal of an explanatory statement with respect to the potential sale of certain property on Burnet Road, White Pine Commercial Park. Motion was carried. ENGINEERNG SERVICES – CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION Robert Petrovich stated this is part of the review process that is going to be necessary with respect to the White Pine Micron project in support of the IDA in review of SEQR related activities across the White Pine site in order to advance the project for construction. He stated as the Board will recall an RFP had been issued to engineering firms to provide service to the Agency, not unlike our legal firms and others. He stated this is a proposal that was received from JMT and staff is requesting the Board’s authorization to engage in this contract. He stated the $4,250,000 will be a pass through and will be billed by the consultant to the Agency, then the Agency will bill Micron and Micron will reimburse the Agency. Jeff Davis stated as requested this is a flat fee process taking us through December 31, 2025 which is an outlier date. He stated the Board needs a consultant to help us review the environmental stuff that is going on by the applicant at the site when their application is fully submitted and they are prepared to move forward. He stated this is lining us up for that. Susan Stanczyk asked if there are extensions built into that resolution. Jeff Davis stated no and anything beyond that date would be a different request. Jeff Davis stated JMT has worked with the Board during the generic environmental impact process so they have a lot of institutional knowledge with regard to the site and its development to the point that we completed the generic environmental impact statement process. He stated JMT does not have a conflict while some of the engineering firms in our stable have a conflict 10 that could present a concern. He stated their proposal was important to us in terms of another firm starting from scratch or it likely would be a higher number. Janice Herzog asked if we would want to revise the action item to say this is a pass through item for the public record. Robert Petrovich stated it will be in the public record through the minutes. Jeff Davis stated the completed application provided to the Board states they are responsible for paying all engineering and legal services. He stated this is consistent with the application they are signing and submitting but because this is a pass through expense they are not paying it directly to JMT or anyone else. He stated the Agency has to do it through a resolution process. Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a contract with JMT of New York, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $4,250,000 for engineering services to provide planning, environmental and engineering support in connection with development of White Pine Commerce Park. Motion was carried. ENGINEERNG SERVICES – CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION Robert Petrovich stated this resolution is to engage the services of Barton & Loguidice to help us with planning and environmental engineering related to the Caughdenoy Industrial Park which was formally known as White Pine South. He stated this is to master plan for the approximately 105 acres that the Agency owns south of Route 31 in support of supply chain or other advance manufacturing microelectronic projects that would come to the area as a result of micron. Patrick Hogan stated this is consistent with the vision of the County Executive as well as this Board. Robert Petrovich stated yes. He stated staff is looking at this as a springboard off of the success we have had at Hancock Industrial Park and there is potentially one parcel left there. He stated it has been a raging success. He stated we think it is a no brainer here being proximal to Micron and supply chain companies are going to want to locate here. He stated we are trying to figure out whether to have one or two larger pads for development or 4, 5 or 6 pads of development that would be occupied by supply chain companies. He stated part of the $15,000 is to figure that out and what is the best use for programming in support of supply chain. 11 Jeff Davis stated consistent with what the site presents to us, it has an easement that comes across it for OCWA and other things, having an engineering firm come in and lay that out as to what needs to be happen with easement and site features will be important for staff to go out and market the site to other companies. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a contract with Barton and Loguidice in an amount of $15,000 for engineering services to provide planning, environmental and engineering regarding Caughdenoy Industrial Park. Motion was carried. PUBLIC RELATIONS/MARKETING SERVICES – CONTRACT AUTHORIZAITON Robert Petrovich stated consistent with legal, engineering and other services we RFP for and hiring a stable of firms to help us with various marketing public relation aspects of what this Board does and what this office advances on behalf of economic development, through the RFP process we have stable of firms we can work with. He stated staff has done a review and submitted some proposals from different firms and the recommendation from staff is that ABC Creative would be the best firm to facilitate marketing and PR particularly given the fact that there is a lot activity going on with respect to White Pine and Micron. He stated obviously what this office has already engaged in but other projects that are significant and coming to the area, we feel it is best to have a coordinated and focused message about what the Board is doing, what the IDA is doing, what the economic development office is doing in supporting economic development and the County Executive’s agenda across the entire area. He stated it is staff’s recommendation that we retain ABC. He stated the office has worked with other firms but we feel ABC is going to meet our needs with respect to programming, with respect to social media and taking a hard look at our website. He stated it’s time for us to step up and do something like the Binghamton IDA website who ABC is working with now. Patrick Hogan asked if the website would be just for Micron. Robert Petrovich stated it will be the IDA website with dropdowns to get information about Micron as necessary. He stated it is more of a holistic marketing and PR approach that we are going to take. He stated we are going to look at potentially doing some interviews, blogs and different things. He stated we are taking the first step on this journey and we need to figure out where that is going to take us but we are excited about this and long overdue. 12 Susan Stanczyk asked what happened to the contract to redesign the website. Nate Stevens stated we successfully updated the website and it was built to simply transmit and hold required information. He stated our role is very different from a public relations perspective. He stated now it is time to consider things like Instagram, Twitter or LinkedIn presence and integrating these things into one service. Susan Stanczyk asked if the contract has expired. Nate Stevens stated he believes so. Janice Herzog stated it is important to have access to that because staff goes out on the road for potential prospects. Robert Petrovich stated one of the things that has hamstrung us is the fact that our collateral materials and our ability to push people to a website where they can get details and substantive information on what we are trying to do, what their needs would be and be able to bring that together to have a project here. He stated we are a little bit one arm behind the back but never the less successful and this will take us to another level. Patrick Hogan stated now with Micron this is critical to have independent information that comes from us that is factual because there is a lot of misinformation out there. Upon a motion by Kevin Ryan, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a contract with ABC Creative Marketing Group in an amount not to exceed $75,000 for public relations/marketing services for OCIDA to communicate the Agency’s objectives. Motion was carried. MICRON ACCESS AGREEMENT Robert Petrovich stated the access agreement has been requested by Micron to allow them to get on the White Pine site on or about May 1 to commence a geotechnical investigation that will provide information to them beyond what the Agency did on a preliminary nature so they can advance their foundation designs and other critical infrastructure that needs to go in the ground in support of the ultimate design and construction of the fab complex. He stated staff has been 13 with counsel working to negotiate an access agreement that certainly protects the IDA but also allows them to advance their information gathering. He stated they are going to be working on the main campus, west of Burnet Road, on the geotechnical investigation. He stated the geotechnical investigation will probably be taking them anywhere between 4 to 6 weeks to complete. He stated they are eager to get started and we want to be helpful to facilitate them getting on the site. Jeff Davis stated in addition to geotech they are doing inspections and due diligence which is consistent with the environmental review done previously. He stated it is a Type 2 action under SEQR and companies are allowed to go out and do inspections and due diligence on properties like this, including geotech. He stated there are some small areas of wetlands delineation they need to complete and some other items they need to accomplish as part of what they are doing for their environmental review. He stated they need people to walk around the site and look at various things. He stated this access agreement is specific. He stated it is specific to various scopes of work they have created and they need to accomplish in order to complete their due diligence and inspections. He stated it requires them to have insurance that protects the IDA. He stated it requires them to provide the Agency notice as to when they are going out. He stated it is not the commencement of construction. He stated it is due diligence work they need to do like any other applicant would need to do on land they are looking to locate a facility on. Kevin Ryan asked if the access agreement has been negotiated and drafted yet. Jeff Davis stated the access agreement has not been reviewed by Micron yet but it has been prepared on the Agency side. He stated some mapping needed to be provided to them which was just received yesterday. He stated they have provided us with the relative scopes in the areas they need to go on the property. He stated this is consistent with other agreements prepared by the Agency. Robert Petrovich stated generally speaking the Access Agreement has a sunset of July 31 but if necessary, appropriate and reasonable we would be willing to extend that in order for them to accomplish the remainder of the work they need to do. Susan Stanczyk asked if the Board is voting on executing the agreement. Jeff Davis stated yes but because this is property OCIDA owns and people will be coming on to it, we thought it would be appropriate to come to the Board to authorize the access and have this discussion. He 14 stated it is not commencement of construction and it really is necessary and required due diligence. Upon a motion Janice Herzog, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of an access agreement with Micron in connection with development of White Pine Commerce Park. Motion was carried. ADJOURN Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board adjourned the meeting at 9:34 am. Motion was carried. _________________________________ Nancy Lowery, Secretary 15 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 335 MONTGOMERY STREET, 2ND FLOOR, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 PHONE: 315.435.3770 • FAX: 315.435.3669 March 31, 2023 2023 Budget Current YTD Revenue / Expense / Income Current Period Current YTD Amount Change to Budget Operating/Non-Op Revenue 515,427 1,481,781 1,472,880 8,901 Administrative Expense 69,201 148,926 816,000 (667,074) Operating/Program Expense 91,566 275,265 656,880 (381,615) Net Ordinary Income 354,660 1,057,590 - 1,057,590 Current Assets Current YTD Prior YTD Total Cash 4,665,662 3,119,651 Less Pass Through Received - - Available Cash 4,665,662 3,119,651 Receivables 722,839 167,163 Grant Reimbursements - - Total 5,388,501 3,286,814 Receivables 0-120 days 722,839 > 120 days Total 722,839 Page18 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Profit and Loss March 2023 TOTAL Income 500 Operating Revenue 2116 Fees 2116.1 Agency Fees 387,601.90 2116.2 Application Fees 10,000.00 2116.3 WPCP Agency Fee 111,111.11 Total 2116 Fees 508,713.01 2655 Other Operating Revenue 2660 FTZ 5,500.00 Total 2655 Other Operating Revenue 5,500.00 Total 500 Operating Revenue 514,213.01 501 Non-Operating Revenue 2401 Interest Income 1,213.63 501.2 Other Non-Operating Revenue 19,833.85 Total 501 Non-Operating Revenue 21,047.48 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 528.003 OHB Redev LLC Funds Pass Thru 1,867.00 Total 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 1,867.00 550 WPCP Pass Thru Revenue 306,565.66 Total Income $843,693.15 GROSS PROFIT $843,693.15 Expenses 6400 Operating Expense 6401 Insurance 6401.1 D&O Insurance 6,148.00 Total 6401 Insurance 6,148.00 6407 Administrative Expense 69,200.68 6408 Meeting Expenses 170.64 6409 Conference Attendence 825.56 6410 Office Expense 3,221.48 6411 Memberships / Sponsorships 1,360.00 Total 6400 Operating Expense 80,926.36 6440 Legal Fees 6450 Barclay Damon 6460 IDA General Legal 4,515.00 6470 WPCP Development 57,940.88 6480 Roth Legal 697.50 Total 6450 Barclay Damon 63,153.38 Total 6440 Legal Fees 63,153.38 Page19 Accrual Basis Friday, April 7, 2023 02:03 PM GMT-04:00 1/2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Profit and Loss March 2023 TOTAL 6500 Agency Program Expenses 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 6510.7 WPCP Marketing 13,684.39 Total 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 13,684.39 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 6530.3 Engineering 3,002.50 Total 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 3,002.50 Total 6500 Agency Program Expenses 16,686.89 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 6606 OHB Redev LLC Funds Pass Thru 1,867.00 Total 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 1,867.00 Total 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 1,867.00 Total Expenses $162,633.63 NET OPERATING INCOME $681,059.52 NET INCOME $681,059.52 Page20 Accrual Basis Friday, April 7, 2023 02:03 PM GMT-04:00 2/2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2023 TOTAL ASSETS Current Assets Bank Accounts 200 Cash 0.00 200.1 Cash - M & T Checking 3,780,895.06 200.2 Cash - M & T Money Maker Savings 893,674.88 200.4 Destiny USA Restricted Cash -8,957.82 210 Petty Cash 50.00 Total 200 Cash 4,665,662.12 Total Bank Accounts $4,665,662.12 Accounts Receivable 380 Accounts Rec. 380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 2,061,755.58 Total 380 Accounts Rec. 2,061,755.58 Total Accounts Receivable $2,061,755.58 Total Current Assets $6,727,417.70 Fixed Assets 100 Land 101 White Pines Commerce Park 25,831,128.37 101.1 WPCP GEIS 101.101 CHA GEIS 1 267,452.05 101.102 CHA GEIS 2 219,439.36 101.104 GEIS Reg Plan Board Overview 19,797.74 Total 101.1 WPCP GEIS 506,689.15 101.2 WPCP Legal 69,774.25 101.3 Engineering Services 52,675.00 101.301 Temporary Access 4,055.44 101.4 Environmental/Demo Services 10,318.98 Total 101.3 Engineering Services 67,049.42 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 101.501 Land Purchases 1,160,063.57 101.502 Closing Costs 3,168.14 Total 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 1,163,231.71 101.6 WPCP Marketing 2,954.34 Total 101 White Pines Commerce Park 27,640,827.24 106 North Salina Properties 0.00 106.1 435 North Salina 17,083.55 106.3 435 North Salina Building 634,421.53 Total 106 North Salina Properties 651,505.08 107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42 Page21 Accrual Basis Friday, April 7, 2023 02:03 PM GMT-04:00 1/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2023 TOTAL Total 100 Land 28,897,172.74 104 Machinery & Equipment 104.1 Office Furniture 1,429.00 104.2 Equipment 4,589.00 Total 104 Machinery & Equipment 6,018.00 211 A/D Office Furniture -3,493.00 213 A/D Buildings -97,603.00 250 Investment in Real Property 6,180,006.00 Total Fixed Assets $34,982,100.74 Other Assets 240 Blue Sky Redevelopment 1,641.76 Total Other Assets $1,641.76 TOTAL ASSETS $41,711,160.20 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Liabilities Current Liabilities Accounts Payable 300 WPCP Pass Thru Payable 901,381.57 Total Accounts Payable $901,381.57 Other Current Liabilities 600 Accounts Payable 0.00 600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 148,925.54 600.102 Due to BD WPCP 42,216.66 600.204 OHB Redev LLC Funds 341,550.50 600.205 Exp Pay Prev Period 13,521.03 600.206 Mileage Reimbursement 92.34 600.208 BlueRock Energy Agreement Deposit 25,000.00 600.209 Syracuse Rail Overpayment 500.00 600.3 Onondaga County Loan 26,088,187.09 600.31 Accrued Interest - OC Note Payable 2,129.00 Total 600.3 Onondaga County Loan 26,090,316.09 Total 600 Accounts Payable 26,662,122.16 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 603 PILOT Pass Thru 1.01 Total 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 1.01 631 Due to Other Governments 631.1 Towns 631.15 Salina -0.81 Total 631.1 Towns -0.81 Page22 Accrual Basis Friday, April 7, 2023 02:03 PM GMT-04:00 2/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2023 TOTAL Total 631 Due to Other Governments -0.81 Total Other Current Liabilities $26,662,122.36 Total Current Liabilities $27,563,503.93 Total Liabilities $27,563,503.93 Equity 3900 Equity Unreserved 9,735,808.53 3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 2,345,838.63 463 Reserve For Contracts 368,811.84 465 Equity - Unreserved 4,017.16 Net Income 1,693,180.11 Total Equity $14,147,656.27 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $41,711,160.20 Page23 Accrual Basis Friday, April 7, 2023 02:03 PM GMT-04:00 3/3 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILLS - SCHEDULE #480 April 13, 2023 GENERAL EXPENSES 1. CRYSTAL ROCK* $ 47.72 Inv#22976721, 3-19-23 2. PARK STRATEGIES** $ 5,000.00 Inv#'s 16587901, 16587902, April-March 2023 3. NATIONWIDE** $ 33.00 Commecial Liability Insurance Premium Acct#7J2551 4. ONONDAGA CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION $ 492.83 1st Quarter 2023 Copier Reimbursement 5. FEDEX $ 16.60 Inv#8-079-76627 6. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 13,682.35 OHB Redev LLC, Inv#5228687 7. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 2,595.00 Roth Steel and IDA Legal TOTAL $ 21,867.50 *Ratification of Check dated March 27, 2023 **Ratification of Checks dated April 3, 2023 Page24 RPNY Solar 4, LLC Project Summary Draft 3/20/2023 1. Project RPNY Solar 4, LLC 2. Project Number 3101-23-1A 3. Location 5986 Clemons Rd 4. School District East Syracuse-Minoa Central School District 6. Project Type New Construction/Solar 5. Tax Parcel(s) 005.-10-01.0 Village Village of Minoa 7.Total Project Cost $ 7,126,990 8. Total Jobs 0 Land $ - 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ 1,015,340 8B: Job Creation 0 Building $ 2,041,423 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ 2,779,079 Equipment Subject to NYS Production $ - Exemption Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 102,400 Financial Charges $ 367,000 Legal Fees $ 200,000 Other- Solar Installation Labor $ - Cost Benefit Analysis RPNY Solar 4, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Abatement Cost $ 462,256 Sales Tax $ 222,326 Mortgage Tax $ 46,723 Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $ 193,206 New Investment $ 7,292,876 PILOT Payments $ 352,333 Project Wages (10 years) $ - Construction Wages $ 435,300 RPNY Solar 4, LLC is proposing a 2.75 MW Solar energy system farm located on 12.4 acres in the Village of Minoa. Employee Benefits (10 years) $ - Project Capital Investment $ 6,505,242 New Sales Tax Generated $ - Page25 RPNY Solar 4, LLC LLC- Draft 3/17/2023 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet Current Revenue Generated by Parcel $ 2,574 Expected Revenue from the Parcel if no project occurred $ 82,436.70 Projected Year 1 Revenue to be generated as a result of the project: $11,000 Total Project Cost $ 7,126,990.26 OCIDA Estimate of Project Value $ 694,769.80 Projected MW to be generated 2.75 Scheduled PILOT Payments $ 352,333.30 Full Tax East Syracuse-Minoa Year Onondaga County Manlius Village of Minoa Total PILOT Payment without Net Exemption Central School District PILOT 10.90% 8.42% 57.70% 22.99% 100.00% 2022-2023 $ 282.69 $ 218.38 $ 1,496.69 $ 575.95 $ 2,573.71 1 $ 1,198.75 $ 926.04 $ 6,346.77 $ 2,528.44 $ 11,000.00 $ 5,041.55 $ (5,958.45) 2 $ 1,222.72 $ 944.57 $ 6,473.70 $ 2,579.01 $ 11,220.00 $ 5,142.38 $ (6,077.62) 3 $ 1,247.18 $ 963.46 $ 6,603.18 $ 2,630.59 $ 11,444.40 $ 5,245.23 $ (6,199.17) 4 $ 1,272.12 $ 982.73 $ 6,735.24 $ 2,683.20 $ 11,673.29 $ 5,350.13 $ (6,323.16) 5 $ 1,297.56 $ 1,002.38 $ 6,869.95 $ 2,736.86 $ 11,906.75 $ 5,457.14 $ (6,449.62) 6 $ 1,323.52 $ 1,022.43 $ 7,007.34 $ 2,791.60 $ 12,144.89 $ 5,566.28 $ (6,578.61) 7 $ 1,349.99 $ 1,042.88 $ 7,147.49 $ 2,847.43 $ 12,387.79 $ 5,677.60 $ (6,710.18) 8 $ 1,376.99 $ 1,063.73 $ 7,290.44 $ 2,904.38 $ 12,635.54 $ 5,791.16 $ (6,844.39) 9 $ 1,404.53 $ 1,085.01 $ 7,436.25 $ 2,962.47 $ 12,888.25 $ 5,906.98 $ (6,981.27) 10 $ 1,432.62 $ 1,106.71 $ 7,584.97 $ 3,021.72 $ 13,146.02 $ 6,025.12 $ (7,120.90) 11 $ 1,461.27 $ 1,128.84 $ 7,736.67 $ 3,082.15 $ 13,408.94 $ 6,145.62 $ (7,263.32) 12 $ 1,490.49 $ 1,151.42 $ 7,891.41 $ 3,143.80 $ 13,677.12 $ 6,268.53 $ (7,408.58) 13 $ 1,520.30 $ 1,174.45 $ 8,049.24 $ 3,206.67 $ 13,950.66 $ 6,393.90 $ (7,556.76) 14 $ 1,550.71 $ 1,197.94 $ 8,210.22 $ 3,270.81 $ 14,229.67 $ 6,521.78 $ (7,707.89) 15 $ 1,581.72 $ 1,221.90 $ 8,374.43 $ 3,336.22 $ 14,514.27 $ 6,652.22 $ (7,862.05) 16 $ 1,613.36 $ 1,246.33 $ 8,541.91 $ 3,402.95 $ 14,804.55 $ 41,859.88 $ 27,055.32 17 $ 1,645.63 $ 1,271.26 $ 8,712.75 $ 3,471.01 $ 15,100.64 $ 42,697.07 $ 27,596.43 18 $ 1,678.54 $ 1,296.69 $ 8,887.01 $ 3,540.43 $ 15,402.66 $ 43,551.01 $ 28,148.36 19 $ 1,712.11 $ 1,322.62 $ 9,064.75 $ 3,611.23 $ 15,710.71 $ 44,422.03 $ 28,711.33 20 $ 1,746.35 $ 1,349.07 $ 9,246.04 $ 3,683.46 $ 16,024.92 $ 45,310.47 $ 29,285.55 21 $ 1,781.28 $ 1,376.05 $ 9,430.96 $ 3,757.13 $ 16,345.42 $ 46,216.68 $ 29,871.26 22 $ 1,816.90 $ 1,403.57 $ 9,619.58 $ 3,832.27 $ 16,672.33 $ 47,141.02 $ 30,468.69 23 $ 1,853.24 $ 1,431.65 $ 9,811.97 $ 3,908.92 $ 17,005.78 $ 48,083.84 $ 31,078.06 24 $ 1,890.31 $ 1,460.28 $ 10,008.21 $ 3,987.09 $ 17,345.89 $ 49,045.52 $ 31,699.62 25 $ 1,928.11 $ 1,489.48 $ 10,208.38 $ 4,066.84 $ 17,692.81 $ 50,026.43 $ 32,333.62 $ 38,396.28 $ 29,661.48 $ 203,288.87 $ 80,986.67 $ 352,333.30 $ 545,539.57 $ 193,206.27 Page26 Renewable Properties, LLC 879 Sanchez Street San Francisco, CA 94114 www.renewprop.com 2/23/2023 Mr. Robert Petrovich Onondaga County IDA 335 Montgomery Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 RE: RPNY Solar 4 PILOT Application Dear Mr. Petrovich, Renewable Properties is pleased to submit an updated Application for Benefits for our RPNY Solar 4, AKA “Clemons Road,” Solar Project for your review and consideration. The Clemons Road Solar Project (Project) is small- scale, 2.75 MWac community solar energy generating facility that will be located on approximately 12.4 acres of a 41.9-acre parcel. The subject parcel is located at 5986 Clemons Road in the Village of Minoa, NY; (APN 005.-10-01.0). The Project company has entered into a long-term lease agreement with the property owner, RC Raimondo Properties, LLC. The Project will generate 2.75 megawatts (MW) of alternating current (AC) emission-free, clean, renewable power. The Project will utilize approximately 6,427 modules and roughly 22 string inverters which convert the sun’s energy into usable AC power. Single-access tracking technology will be utilized to allow the modules to efficiently track the sun throughout the day and maximize the efficiency of solar collection. The modules will be mounted on a steel racking system, which will be anchored into the ground using driven steel piers. During the construction period, the Project will create up to 30 full-time construction jobs. We are aware of OCIDA’s local labor requirements and are working with our engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) prime contractor towards the 100% local labor requirement. RPNY Solar 4 requests this PILOT because our financial modeling indicates the Project would not be feasible otherwise. Although projects of this size offer outsized community benefits, their relatively small footprint mean less of an ability to take advantage of the economies of scale available to larger projects. For those reasons, a $4,000/MW PILOT is essential to bringing this opportunity and benefits to Onondaga County. It should be noted that tax revenue from community solar systems have a 100% net benefit to the tax base. The Project will not burden municipal resources in any manner and therefore the tax proceeds generated from the existence of the Project have a 100% reduction on municipal expenses. Moreover, the Project will still pay any applicable special district taxes. It is respectfully submitted that almost no other applicant or taxpayer/use can make that representation. PILOT payments with a 2% contractual escalator will total $ 11,000/year for base year up to $17,692 in year 25 for a total of $352,333 in payment in lieu of taxes. Letters of support for the proposed PILOT have been obtained from the Village of Minoa, the Town of Manlius, the East Syracuse Minoa Central School District, and the Onondaga County Legislature and have been attached to this application. Page27 Renewable Properties, LLC 879 Sanchez Street San Francisco, CA 94114 www.renewprop.com We appreciate the Board’s comments at the February 9, 2023 meeting regarding the original application. The Project is committed to using to using local labor and has removed the request for a waiver at this time. We look forward to your review of this application and welcome any comments or questions you may have. Sincerely, RENEWABLE PROPERTIES Anthony Bell Permitting Manager Application Materials Enclosed: 1. OCIDA Benefits Application 2. Project Narrative and Description 3. Approved Project Site Plan 4. Parcel PDD figure 5. FEAF 6. SEQR Determination 7. Village of Minoa Approval Resolutions 8. Taxing Jurisdictions PILOT Letters of Support 9. Lease Agreement 10. Project Decommissioning Plan Cc: Robert Panasci, Esq., Young Sommer Stephanie Loucas, Renewable Properties Nancy Lowery, OCIDA Page28 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPLICATION FOR BENEFITS 1. In accordance with Section 224-a(8)(d) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law, the Agency has identified that any “financial assistance” (within the meaning of Section 858 of the General Municipal Law) granted by the Agency to the Applicant consisting of sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax exemption benefits and real property tax exemption benefits, constitutes “public funds” within the meaning of Section 224-a(2)(b) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law and such funds are not excluded under Section 224-a(3) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law. The Agency hereby notifies the Applicant of the Applicant’s obligations under Section 224-a (8)(a) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law. 2. Fill in all blanks using “none”, “not applicable” or “not available”. If you have any questions about the way to respond, please call the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (the “Agency” or “OCIDA”) at 315-435-3770. 3. If providing an estimate put “(est.)” after the figure or answer. If more space is needed to answer any specific question, attach a separate sheet. 4. If the OCIDA Board approves benefits, it is the company’s responsibility to obtain and submit all necessary forms and documents. 5. When completed, return this Application by mail or fax to the Agency at the address indicated below. A signed application may also be submitted electronically in PDF format to Nancy Lowery at nancylowery@ongov.net. An Application will not be considered by the Agency until the Application fee has been received. 6. The Agency will not give final approval for this Application until the Agency receives a completed NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form concerning the project which is the subject of this Application. The form is available at http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html. 7. Please note the Public Officers Law declares all records in the possession of the OCIDA (with certain limited exceptions) are open to public inspection and copying. If the Applicant is of the opinion that there are elements of the project which are in the nature of trade secrets which, if disclosed to the public or otherwise widely disseminated, would cause substantial injury to the Applicant’s competitive position, this Applicant must identify such elements in writing and request that such elements be kept confidential. In accordance with Article 6 of the Public Officer’s Law, the OCIDA may also redact personal, private, and/or proprietary information from publicly disseminated documents. 8. The Applicant will be required to pay the Agency Application fee and, if accepted as a project of the Agency, all administrative and legal fees as stated in Section VI of the Application. 9. A complete Application consists of the following 9 items:  This Application  Local Access Agreement  Employment Plan Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 1 Page29  Conflict of Interest  A feasibility statement indicating the need for the requested benefits  Description of Project, Site Plans/Sketches, and Maps  NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form  A check payable to the Agency in the amount of $1,000  A check payable to Barclay Damon LLP in the amount of $2,500 10. This Application was adopted by the OCIDA Board on January 18, 2022. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 2 Page30 It is the policy of the Agency that any project receiving benefits from the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency will utilize 100% local contractors and local labor for the construction period of the project unless a waiver is granted in writing by the Agency. Return to: Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Attn: Nancy Lowery 333 W. Washington Street, Suite 130 Syracuse, NY 13202 Phone: 315-435-3770 | Fax: 315-435-3669 nancylowery@ongov.net Section I: Applicant Information Please answer all questions. Use “None”, “Not Applicable” and “See Attached” where necessary. Submittal Date: _____________ A) Applicant/Project Operator information (company receiving benefits): Applicant/Project Operator: Click here to enter text. RPNY Solar 4, LLC Applicant/ Project Operator Address: 879 Sanchez St, San Francisco, CA 94114 Phone: (415) 710-3834 Fax: (415) 366-2952 Website: renewprop.com E-mail: stephanie@renewprop.com Federal ID#: 85-4235858 NAICS: 23 State and Year of Incorporation/Organization: __________________________________________ New York 2020 Owner (if different from Applicant/Project Operator): ______________________ Owner Address: Federal ID#: State and Year of Incorporation/Organization: List of stockholders, members, or partners of Owner: ________________________________________________________________________________ B) Individual Completing Application: Name: Title: Stephanie Loucas Address: Vice President of Development 879 Sanchez St, San Francisco, CA 94114 Phone: (415) 710-3834 Fax: N/A E-mail: stephanie@renewprop.com Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 1 Page31 C) Company Contact (if different from individual completing application): Name: Anthony Bell Title: Permitting Manager Address: 879 Sanchez St, San Francisco, CA 94114 Phone: 801-557-7971 Cell Phone: 801-557-7971 E-mail: anthony@renewprop.com D) Company Counsel: Name of Attorney: Rob Panasci Firm Name: Young Sommer LLC Address: Executive Woods, Five Palisades Drive, Albany, NY 12205 Phone: 518.438.9907 Ext. 251 Cell Phone: E-mail: rpanasci@youngsommer.com E) Business Organization (check appropriate category): ☐ Corporation ☐Partnership ☐ Public Corporation ☐Joint Venture ☐ Sole Proprietorship ☐Limited Liability Company ☐ Other (please specify): Year Established: 2020 State in which Organization is established: New York F) List all stockholders, members, or partners with % of ownership greater than 5%: Name % of ownership Wildcat Renewables, LLC 100% Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 2 Page32 G) Applicant Business Description: Estimated % of sales within Onondaga County: ________________________________________ 55 Estimated % of sales outside Onondaga County but within New York State: 45 Estimated % of sales outside New York State but within the U.S.: 0 Estimated % of sales outside the U.S.: 0 (*Percentage to equal 100%) H) Applicant History: If the answer to any of the following is “Yes”, please explain below. If necessary, attach additional information. 1. Is the company or management of the Company now a ☐Yes ☐No plaintiff or defendant in any civil or criminal litigation? 2. Has any person listed above ever been convicted of a criminal offense (other than a minor traffic violation)? ☐Yes ☐No 3. Has any person listed in Section I ever been in receivership or declared bankruptcy? Please attach any explanations. ☐Yes ☐No I) Has the Project Beneficiary received assistance from OCIDA, Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (SIDA), New York State or the Onondaga Civic Development Corporation (OCDC) in the past? If yes please attach an explanation and please give year, project name, and description of benefits and address of project. ☐Yes ☐No Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 3 Page33 Section II: Project and Site Information A) Project Location: Location where the investment will take place. If Company is moving, the new location should be entered here and the current location should be in Section I. Address: 5986 Clemons Rd Legal Address (if different): City: Village/Town: Village of Minoa Zip Code: 13057 School District: East Syracuse-Minoa Central School District Tax Map Parcel ID(s): 005.-10-01.0 Full Market Value: ________________ $64,600 Footage of Existing Building: _________________ N/A Census Tract: ___________________________________________________________________ 0154.00 B) Type (Check all that apply): ☐New construction ☐Purchase of machinery and/or equipment ☐Expansion/Addition to current facilities ☐Brownfield/Remediated Brownfield ☐Renovation of existing facility ☐LEED Certification ☐ Housing Project ☐Demolition and Construction ☐ Renewable Energy Project ☐Acquisition of existing facility/property ☐ Retail ☐Other: C) Project Narrative: A statement that there is a likelihood that the project would not be undertaken but for the financial assistance provided by the Agency or, if the project could be undertaken without financial assistance provided by the Agency, a statement indicating why the project should be undertaken by the agency. * For a Retail Project (also see page 14) * For a Renewable Energy Project (also see page 15) * For a Housing Project (also see page 17) D) Description of Project: Please provide a detailed narrative of the proposed Project. Please separately attach the description and any copies of site plans, sketches or maps. This narrative should include, but is not limited to: ☐ i) a description of your Company’s background, customers, goods and services and the principal products to be produced and/or the principal activities that will occur on the Project site; ☐ (ii) the size of the Project in square feet and a breakdown of square footage per each intended use; ☐ (iii) the size of the lot upon which the Project sits or is to be constructed; ☐ (iv) the current use of the site and the intended use of the site upon completion of the Project; ☐ (vi) describe your method for site control (Own, lease, other). Lease Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 4 Page34 E) Select Project type for all end users at Project site (you may check more than one): **Please check any and all end users as identified below ☐ Industrial ☐Bank Office ☐ Acquisition of Existing Facility ☐Retail ( see page 14) ☐ Housing Project ( see page 17 ) ☐Mixed Use ☐ Equipment Purchase ☐Facility for Aging ☐ Multi-Use Tenant ☐Civic Facility (not for profit) ☐ Renewable Energy Project ( see page 15) ☐Other ______________________ ☐ Commercial F) If applicant will not occupy 100% of the building in a real estate transaction, provide information on tenant(s) that includes name, present address, and percentage of project to be leased, type of business organization, relationship to applicant, date and term of lease. Not Applicable G) For the Agency to consider this Project, please provide the following information: 1. Does the Project consist of new construction or expansion or substantial renovation of an existing facility? ☐Yes ☐No 2. Will the Project create new employment opportunities or retain existing jobs that may otherwise be lost? ☐Yes ☐No 3. Does the Project beneficiary serve a customer base primarily outside of Onondaga County? ☐Yes ☐No H) Will the completion of the Project result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the company from one area of the state to another area of the state OR in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the company located within the state? Please explain if you answer “Yes” by attaching a response. ☐Yes ☐No I) Please attach a description of any compelling circumstances the Agency should be aware of while reviewing this application. See attached project narrative J) Local Approvals (Site Plan and Environmental Review) 1. Have site plans been submitted to the appropriate town or local planning department? ☐Yes. What is the status? ☐No. When will the plans be submitted? _______________________________________________________ The Project has been approved by the Planning Board and Village Board Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 5 Page35 2. Has the project received site plan approval from the town or local planning board? ☐Yes ☐No 3. If no, what is the anticipated approval date? ________________________________ 4. If yes, provide the Agency with a copy of the Planning Board’s approval resolution along with the related SEQR determination. (NOTE: SEQR determination is required for final approval and sales tax agency appointment.) 5. Environmental Information a. Please attach the appropriate Environmental Impact Forms to your application. Here is a link to the SEQR forms: http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html b. Have any environmental issues been identified on the property? ☐Yes ☐No If yes, please attach an explanation. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 6 Page36 Section III: Construction A) Project Costs and Finances Description of Costs Total % of Total Total Private Expenditure Budget Budget to be (should be less than or Amount Procured in equal to total budget Onondaga amount) County Land Acquisition 0 - 0.00% 0 Site Work/Demo $1,015,340.34 - 87.14% $1,015,340.34 Building Construction 43.20% & Renovation $2,041,422.72 - $2,041,422.72 Furniture & Fixtures 0 - 0.00% 0 Equipment* $2,779,079.20 - 7.57% $2,779,079.20 Engineering/Architect $102,400.00 - 9.47% $102,400.00 sFinancial Charges $367,000.00 - 0.00% $367,000.00 Legal $200,000.00 - 0.00% $200,000.00 Other 0 - 0.00% 0 Management/Developer Fees $621,748.00 - 0.00% $621,748.00 Total Project Cost $7,126,990.26 - 27.88% $7,126,990.26 Note: Do not include OCIDA fees, OCIDA application fees or OCIDA legal fees as part of the Total Project Cost. You may attach a separate chart if needed. B) TOTAL Capital Costs $ $7,126,990.26 Project refinancing: estimated amount (For refinancing of existing debt only) $0 Sources of Funds for Project Costs: 1. Bank Financing $ _______________ 6,229,751.00 2. Equity (excluding equity that is attributed to grants/tax credits) $ 897,239.26 3. Tax Exempt Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ _______________ 0 4. Taxable Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ 0 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 7 Page37 5. Public Sources (Include sum total of all state and federal grants and tax credits) $ 0 -Identify each state and federal grant/credit: $ $ $ 6. Total Sources of Funds for Project Costs $ _______________ $7,126,990.26 C) Employment and Payroll Information *Full Time Equivalent (FTE) is defined as one employee working no less than 40 hours per week or two or more employees together working a total of 40 hours per week. 1. Are there people currently employed at the project site? ☐Yes ☐No If yes, provide number of FTE jobs at the facility: 2. Complete the following: Estimate the number of FTE jobs to be retained as a result of this Project: 0 Estimate the number of construction jobs to be created by this Project: 30 (est.) Estimate the average length of construction jobs to be created (months): 4 Months Current annual payroll at facility: N/A Please list, if any, benefits that will be available to either full and/or part time employees: N/A Average annual benefit paid by the company ($ or % salary) per FTE job: N/A Amount or percent of wage employees pay for benefits: N/A Provide an estimate of the number of residents in the Economic Development Region (Onondaga, Madison, Cayuga, Oneida, Oswego, and Cortland Counties) to fill new FTE jobs: N/A Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 8 Page38 D) New Employment Benefits i. Complete the following chart indicating the number of FTE jobs presently employed at the Project and the number of FTE jobs that will be created at the Project site at the end of the first, second, and third, years after the Project is completed. Jobs should be listed by title of category (see below), including FTE independent contractors or employees of independent contractors that work at the Project location. Do not include construction workers. ii. Feel free to include additional information or a substitute chart if you think additional material would add clarity. Please use this chart to illustrate the current employment: Job Title/Category Current Annual Pay Current Employment (FTE) NA Please use this chart to illustrate the projected employment growth: Job Title/Category Current Annual Pay Jobs Created Jobs Created Jobs Created Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 NA If you prefer, you may attach a job chart of your own that outlines the job growth projections regarding the Project. E) Financial Assistance sought (estimated values): ☐ Real Property Tax Abatement (PILOT): Seeking PILOT of $4,000/MW for 25 years ☐ Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption (.75% of amount mortgaged): 46,723.13 ☐ Sales and Use Tax Exemption (4% Local, 4% State): $222,326.34 ☐ Tax Exempt Bond Financing (Amount Requested): 0 ☐ Taxable Bond Financing (Amount Requested): 0 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 9 Page39 F) Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption Benefit Calculator: Amount of mortgage that would be subject to mortgage recording tax: Mortgage Amount (include sum total of construction/permanent/ bridge financing): $ 6,229,751.00 Estimated Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption Benefit (product of mortgage amount as indicated above, multiplied by .0075): $ 46,723.13 G) Sales and Use Tax Benefit Calculator: Gross amount of costs for goods and services that are subject to State and local Sales and Use Tax – said amount to benefit from the Agency’s Sales and Use Tax exemption benefit: $ 2,779,079.20 Estimated State and local Sales and Use Tax Benefit (product of 8% multiplied by the figure, above) (This should match the amount in section “E” on page 9, this calculation only exists to help you with your estimate): $ 222,326.34 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 10 Page40 Section IV: Estimate of Real Property Tax Abatement Benefits Section IV of this Application will be: (i) completed by IDA Staff based upon information contained within the Application, and (ii) provided to the Applicant for ultimate inclusion as part of this completed Application prior to the completed application being provided to the OCIDA Board. A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet OCIDA estimate of current value New construction and renovation costs OCIDA estimate of increase in value OCIDA estimated value of completed project OCIDA estimate of taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur Scheduled PILOT payments PILOT Exemption County Local School Total Full Tax Net Exemption Year % PILOT PILOT PILOT PILOT Payment Amount Amount Amount w/o PILOT 1 100 2 90 3 80 4 70 5 60 6 50 7 40 8 30 9 20 10 10 TOTAL Estimates provided are based on current property tax rates and assessment value (current as of date of application submission) and have been calculated by IDA staff. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 11 Page41 SECTION: V ForProjects For Retail Retail Projects Only Only Tax 1. Will the cost of the retail portion of the Project exceed one-third of the total project cost? ☐Yes ☐No 2. Is the Project located in a distressed area? A distressed area is a census tract that has a) a poverty rate of a least 20% or at least 20% of households receiving public assistance, and (b) an unemployment rate of least 1.25 times the statewide unemployment rate for the year to which the date relates. ☐Yes ☐No 3. Is the Project likely to attract a significant number of visitors from outside of the economic development region? ☐Yes ☐No 4. Is the predominate purpose of the Project to make available goods or services which would not, but for the Project, be reasonably accessible to the residents of the Town, City, County or Village of where the Project will be located. ☐Yes ☐No Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 12 Page42 SECTION VI: For Solar Projects Only Please complete the following as an addendum: P X, an 1. Describe the reasons why the Agency’s financial assistance is necessary. Describe how the Project would be affected if these benefits were not provided. [see Section II (C)] 2. Is the applicant leasing the property? ☐ Yes, please provide a copy of the lease ☐ No, purchased the property. Please provide documentation. 3. Has the applicant provided written communication to the affected taxing jurisdictions notifying them of its intent to construct a renewable energy project? ☐ Yes ☐ No 4. Has the applicant received a letter of support for the megawatt cost to be used as a basis for the PILOT from the town, city or village where the Project is located? ☐ Yes. Please provide copy. ☐ No 5. Has the applicant received a letter of support for the megawatt cost to be used as a basis for PILOT from the school district? ☐ Yes. Please provide copy. ☐ No 6. Is the entire parcel being used for the solar project? ☐ Yes ☐ No, if not, have you reached out to the town assessor to discuss a subdivision or slash parcel? Explain: ___________________________________________ Yes- we've been coordinating with the Town Assessor through the PDD approval prcess 7. Will the applicant enter into a decommissioning plan with the host community, including financial assurance the plan can be executed? ☐ Yes, explain. ☐ No *PLEASE SEE FOLLOWING PAGE FOR OCIDA SOLAR GUIDANCE & BEST PRACTICE Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 13 Page43 OCIDA Solar PILOTs Guidance and Best Practice OCIDA SOLAR PILOTs GUIDANCE AND BEST PRACTICE To be placed on the OCIDA meeting agenda, proposed solar projects must provide OCIDA with the following in advance of the Project’s first OCIDA meeting: 1. Fully completed OCIDA application. 2. Copy of Environmental Assessment Form. 3. A SEQR resolution approved by a local municipality indicating municipality will be lead agency, the type of action (I, II, or unlisted) and, if completed, the SEQR determination made by the municipality. 4. Copies of your zoning applications submitted to the local municipality. 5. Verification of parcel subdivision process with the town (if the entire parcel will not be used for the solar project). 6. A statement clarifying whether the applicant will lease or purchase the real property on which the Project is situated. If leased, provide a copy of the proposed or executed lease. If lease parcel is less then entire parcel then see 5 above. 7. A supporting document from the School District and the Town Board outlining the agreed upon cost per megawatt to be used as a basis for the PILOT. OCIDA cannot create the PILOT schedule without this information. 8. Absent a showing otherwise by the Company, deemed acceptable by the Agency in the sole and absolute discretion, the Company must close with the Agency on a project prior to consideration of any requested organizational structure or project entity ownership changes. You will receive a draft Cost Benefit Analysis and a Draft PILOT schedule from this office. You may use these documents as your Project progresses through the OCIDA approval process. OCIDA staff are available to update these two documents as needed. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 14 Page44 SECTION VII: For Housing Projects Only Please complete the following as an addendum: 1. Describe the reasons why the Agency’s financial assistance is necessary. Describe how the project would be impacted if these benefits were not provided. [see Section II (C)] 2. Is the Project being built in a blighted area? Please describe. 3. Is the Project fulfilling an unmet need in the area? Please explain. 4. Please provide a market study documenting a need for such housing. 5. Is there support from local government officials for the Project and for the financial assistance being requested from the Agency? Please provide written documentation. 6. Is the Project considered infill in a populated area? Please explain. 7. Does the Project provide walkability? 8. Is there additional county infrastructure necessary to service the Project? If, yes, please explain. 9. Is the Project part of a larger mixed-use development? Please describe. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 15 Page45 Page46 Section IX: Agency Fee Schedule * Minimum Fee to be applied to all project receiving OCIDA benefits is 1% of the Total Project Cost (TPC) ACTIVITY FEES COMMENTS N Non- refundable Application Fee (All projects $1,000 Due at time of except Solar Projects) application Non-refundable Application Fee (Solar $10,000 Projects Only) L Legal Deposit (All projects except Solar $2,500 Due at time of Projects) application S Legal Deposit (Solar Projects Only) $5,000 Minimum Fee of 1% of TPC 1. Sales and Use Tax Exemption .01 X TPC Due at closing 2. Mortgage Recording Tax 3. PILOT is an additional fee .0025 X TPC (total .0125) Bonds Due at closing B Bond refinancing and refunding .0025 of TPC A Agency Legal Fees .0. Fe Fee for first $20 million .0025 X of the project cost or bond Due at closing amount Fe Fee for expenses above $20 million .. .0 .00125 X of project cost or bond amount . Amendment or Modification of IDA U Up to but not to exceed 5% of Agency Due at time of documents, including but not limited to name Fee as noted on the Cost Benefit Request or organization change, refinancing, etc. Analysis at time of project approval. Consent to the amendment or modification ofLe Attorney fees determined by OCIDA IDA documents prior to closing on the project Legal Representative. shall be given at OCIDA’s sole and absolute discretion. OCIDA reserves the right to modify this schedule at any time and assess fees and charges in connection with other transactions such as grants of easement or lease or sale of OCIDA-owned property. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 17 Page47 Section X: Recapture of Tax Abatement/Exemptions Information to be Provided by Companies: Each Company agrees that to receive benefits from the Agency it must, whenever requested by the Agency or required under applicable statutes or project documents, provide and certify or cause to be provided and certified such information concerning the Company, its finances, its employees and other topics which shall, from time to time, be necessary or appropriate, including but not limited to, such information as to enable the Agency to make any reports required by law or governmental regulation. Please refer to the OCIDA Uniform Tax Exemption Policy. (add hyperlink) I have read the foregoing and agree to comply with all the terms and conditions contained therein as well as policies of the Onondaga County Industrial Agency. Name of Applicant Company _________________________________ RPNY Solar 4, LLC Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Aaron Halimi, President Date: ______________ 1/11/23 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 18 Page48 Section XI: Conflict of Interest Agency Board Members 1. Patrick Hogan, Chairperson 2. Janice Herzog, Vice Chairperson 3. Steve Morgan, Director 4. Victor Ianno, Director 5. Sue Stanczyk, Director 6. Kevin Ryan, Director 7. Fanny Villarreal, Director Agency Officers/Staff 1. Robert M. Petrovich, Executive Director 2. Nathaniel Stevens, Treasurer 3. Nancy Lowery, Secretary 4. Karen Doster, Recording Secretary 5. Christopher Cox, Assistant Treasurer Agency Legal Counsel & Auditor 1. Jeffrey Davis, Esq., Barclay Damon LLP 2. Amanda Fitzgerald, Esq., Barclay Damon LLP 3. Michael G. Lisson, CPA, Grossman St. Amour Certified Public Accountants PLLC The Applicant has received from the Agency a list of members, officers and staff of the Agency. To the best of my knowledge, no member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect, in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described: Name of Applicant Company _________________________________ RPNY Solar 4, LLC Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Aaron Halimi, President Date: ______________ 1/11/23 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 19 Page49 Section XII: Representations, Certifications, and Indemnification Aaron Halimi (Name of CEO or other authorized representative of Applicant) confirms and says that he/she is the ____________________ President (title) of ____________________ RPNY Solar 4, LLC (name of corporation or other entity) named in the attached Application (the “Applicant”), that he/she has read the foregoing Application and knows the contents thereof, and hereby represents, understands, and otherwise agrees with the Agency and as follows: A. First Consideration for Employment: In accordance with §858-b (2) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any Financial Assistance from the Agency, except as otherwise provided by collective bargaining agreements, where practicable, the Applicant will first consider persons eligible to participate in WIA programs who shall be referred by the CNY Works for new employment opportunities created as a result of the Project. B. Other NYS Facilities: In accordance with §862 (1) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that projects which will result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant within the state is ineligible for Agency Financial Assistance, unless otherwise approved by the Agency as reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project in its respective industry or is reasonably necessary. C. Annual Sales Tax Filings: In accordance with §874(8) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any sales tax exemptions as part of the Financial Assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file, or cause to be filed, with the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, the annual form prescribed by the Department of Taxation and Finance, describing the value of all sales tax exemptions claimed by the Applicant and all consultants or subcontractors retained by the Applicant. D. Outstanding Bonds: The Applicant understands and agrees to provide on an annual basis any information regarding bonds, if any, issued by the Agency for the project that is requested by the Comptroller of the State of New York. E. Employment Reports: The Applicant understands and agrees that, if the Project receives any financial assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file with the Agency, at least annually or as otherwise required by the Agency, reports regarding the number of people employed at the project site, salary levels, contractor utilization and such other information (collectively, “Employment Reports”) that may be required from time to time on such appropriate forms as designated by the Agency. Failure to provide Employment Reports within 30 days of an Agency request shall be an Event of Default under the PILOT Agreement between the Agency and Applicant and, if applicable, an Event of Default under the Agent Agreement between the Agency and Applicant. In addition, a Notice of Failure to provide the Agency with an Employment Report may be reported to Agency board members, with said report being an agenda item subject to the open meetings law. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 20 Page50 F. Prevailing Wage: The Applicant understands and agrees that, if the Project receives any financial assistance from the Agency, the Applicant shall determine whether the Project is a “covered project” pursuant to Section 224-a of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law and, if applicable, the Applicant shall comply with Section 224-a of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law; and the Applicant further covenants that the Applicant shall provide such evidence of the foregoing as requested by the Agency. G. Absence of Conflicts of Interest: The Applicant has received from the Agency a list of the members, officers and employees of the Agency. No member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described in Section X. H. Compliance: The Applicant understands and agrees that it is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection, and environmental laws, rules, and regulations. I. The Applicant understands and agrees that the provisions of Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law, as provided below, will not be violated if financial assistance is provided for the proposed Project: § 862. Restrictions on funds of the Agency. (1) No funds of the Agency shall be used in respect of any project if the completion thereof would result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant located within the state, provided, however, that neither restriction shall apply if the agency shall determine on the basis of the application before it that the project is reasonably necessary to discourage the project occupant from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the state or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project occupant in its respective industry. J. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the owner, occupant or operator receiving financial assistance for the proposed Project is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection and environmental laws, rules and regulations. K. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the submission of any knowingly false or knowingly misleading information may lead to the immediate termination of any financial assistance and the reimbursement of an amount equal to all or part of any tax exemption claimed by reason of the Agency’s involvement in the Project. L. The Applicant confirms and hereby acknowledges that as of the date of this Application, the Applicant is in substantial compliance with all provisions of Article 18-A of the New York General Municipal Law, including, but not limited to, the provision of Section 859- a and Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 21 Page51 M. The Applicant and the individual executing this Application on behalf of Applicant acknowledge that the Agency and its counsel will rely on the representations and covenants made in this Application when acting hereon and hereby represents that the statements made herein do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact and do not omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement contained herein not misleading. N. The OCIDA has the right to request and inspect supporting documentation regarding attestations made on this application. O. Hold Harmless Agreement: Applicant hereby releases Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency and the members, officers, servants, agents and employees thereof (the "Agency") from, agrees that the Agency shall not be liable for, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Agency harmless from and against any and all liability arising from or expense incurred by: (A) the Agency's examination and processing of, and action pursuant to or upon, the attached Application, regardless of whether or not the Application or the Project described therein or the tax-exemptions and other assistance requested therein are favorably acted upon by the Agency; (B) the Agency's acquisition, construction, and/or installation of the Project described therein and (C) any further action taken by the Agency with respect to the Project, including without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all cause of action and attorney's fees and any other expenses incurred in defending any suits or action which may arise as a result of any of the foregoing. If, for any reason, the Applicant fails to conclude or consummate necessary negotiations, or fails, within a reasonable or specified period of time, to take reasonable, proper or requested action, or withdraws, abandons, cancels or neglects the Application, or if the Agency or the Applicant are unable to reach final agreement with respect to the Project, then, and in the event, upon presentation of an invoice itemizing the same, the Applicant shall pay to the Agency, its agents or assigns, all costs incurred by the Agency in the process of the Application, including attorney's fees, if any. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 22 Page52 Name of Applicant Company: Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: � Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: Aaron Halimi Date: ------- 1111123 STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF ONONDAGA ) ss.; ----------------, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: Aaron Halimi 1. That I am the President (Corporate Officer) of RPNY Solar 4, LLC (Applicant) and that I am duly authorized on behalf of the Applicant to bind the Applicant. 2. That I have read and attached Application, I Know the contents thereof, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, this Application and the contents of this Application are true, accurate and complete (Signature of Officer) Subscribed and affirmed to me und�Walties of perjury this .2-tJ day o'f'__:'20� End of Application Rev 1.18.22 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 23 Page53 Renewable Properties, LLC 879 Sanchez Street San Francisco, CA 94114 www.renewprop.com RPNY Solar 4, LLC ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPLICATION FOR BENEFITS ATTACHMENTS Page54 PROJECT NARRATIVE & DESCRIPTION Page55 Renewable Properties, LLC 879 Sanchez Street San Francisco, CA 94114 www.renewprop.com RPNY Solar 4 Clemons Road Solar Project Project Narrative & Description Project Site The Clemons Road Solar Project (Project) is small-scale community solar energy generating facility that will be located on approximately 12.4 acres of a 41.9-acre parcel. The subject parcel is located at 5986 Clemons Road (APN 005.-10-01.0) in the Village of Minoa, NY, and is currently vacant with no active uses. The Project’s parent company, Wildcat Renewables, LLC, has entered into a long-term lease agreement with the property owner, RC Raimondo Properties, LLC (copy of lease agreement attached), which will be transferred to RPNY Solar 4, LLC. The Project will generate 2.75 megawatts (MW) of alternating current (AC) emission-free, clean, renewable power. The Applicant RPNY Solar 4, LLC is an affiliate and subsidiary of Wildcat Renewables, LLC, a subsidiary of Renewable Properties, LLC. Renewable Properties is a national developer, financier, owner, and operator of community solar PV and energy storage projects across the county. The company currently has a development pipeline of over 600 megawatts across 12 states, with over a dozen projects in development or operating in New York alone. Municipal Approvals A full environmental assessment form (FEAF) was completed by the Project team and submitted to the Town of Manlius in December of 2021 (FEAF attached). The Village of Minoa Board of Trustees declared their intent to serve as SEQRA lead agency, classified the Project as an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA and declared to conduct an uncoordinated SEQRA review of the Unlisted Action at their meeting on February 4, 2022. At their September 6, 2022, meeting, the Village of Minoa Board of Trustees issued a Negative Declaration of Significant Adverse Impact as SEQRA lead agency for the proposed Project (a copy is attached). The Project was approved to be rezoned as a Planned Development District (PDD) allowing for solar development on approximately 14.2 acres of the larger, 41.9-acre parcel (PDD graphic included). The Project received Site Plan approval from the Village of Minoa Board of Trustees on October 17, 2022 (approving resolutions attached). Project Description The Project will interconnect to National Grid’s existing electrical distribution system, which is located on site. The power generated from this facility will be sold to consumers via the state's Community Distributed Generation program (commonly called community solar). This program allows customers to directly offset their energy use with local solar power while saving money on their electrical bills. According to National Energy Laboratory, only 27% of all homes in the United States can install solar panels. This statistic indicates 73% of the country's population is denied access to renewable energy. Community solar provides utility savings and renewable energy access to businesses and residents that cannot install solar panels on their building because of a lack of financial means, or because of a physical barrier to installation. Community solar lowers the barriers of access to renewable energy, making it attainable for all local residents. The Project will generate an estimated 4,842,000 kWhrs of pollution-free electricity annually, supplying roughly 432 local residences. Additionally, the Project will generate community solar credits for ninety cents on the dollar which will be credited it to residents’ utility invoices. Both residential and commercial customers can take advantage of the savings. The Project will utilize approximately 6,427 modules and roughly 22 string inverters which convert the sun’s energy into usable AC power. Single-access tracking technology will be utilized to allow the modules to Page56 Renewable Properties, LLC 879 Sanchez Street San Francisco, CA 94114 www.renewprop.com efficiently track the sun throughout the day and maximize the efficiency of solar collection. The modules will be mounted on a steel racking system, which will be anchored into the ground using driven steel piers. The Project will provide electric utility cost savings for Onondaga County residents and businesses. The Project will also result in increased revenues to the county and local municipal tax base, payments to the local hospitality industry, purchase of local supplies and goods, and lease revenues to the participating landowner. During the construction period, the Project will create up to 30 full-time construction jobs. We are aware of OCIDA’s local labor requirements and are working with our engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) prime contractor towards the 100% local labor requirement. OCIDA Benefits Statement RPNY Solar 4 requests this PILOT because our financial modeling indicates the Project would not be feasible otherwise. Although projects of this size offer outsized community benefits, their relatively small footprint mean less of an ability to take advantage of the economies of scale available to larger projects. For those reasons, a $4,000/MW PILOT is essential to bringing this opportunity and benefits to Onondaga County. It should be noted that tax revenue from community solar systems have a 100% net benefit to the tax base. The Project will not burden municipal resources in any manner and therefore the tax proceeds generated from the existence of the Project have a 100% reduction on municipal expenses. Moreover, the Project will still pay any applicable special district taxes. It is respectfully submitted that almost no other applicant or taxpayer/use can make that representation. PILOT payments with a 2% contractual escalator will total $ 11,000/year for base year up to $17,692 in year 25 for a total of $352,333 in payment in lieu of taxes. Letters of support for the proposed PILOT have been obtained from the Village of Minoa, the Town of Manlius, the East Syracuse Minoa Central School District, and the Onondaga County Legislature and have been attached to this application. We are excited to work with the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency and advance this Project through to commercial operation. Sincerely, PROJECT SITE PLAN Page58 OWNER: RC RAIMONDO PROPERTIES, LLC 280 East Broad Street // Suite 200 // Rochester, NY 14604 585.232.5135 / 585.232.4652 fax www.bergmannpc.com APPLICANT:RPNY SOLAR 4, LLC 5986 CLEMONS RD VILLAGE OF MINOA ONONDAGACOUNTY, NY CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM PROJECT FINAL SITE PLAN PROJECT CONTACT LIST DRAWING INDEX DATE DESCRIPTION OWNER: ARCHITECT: ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: APPROVED BY: 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS - RC RAIMONDO PROPERTIES, LLC - TBD - TBD C000 COVER SHEET 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS - 46 PIER 7 CHARLESTOWN, MA 02129 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS C001 GENERAL NOTES 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS OWNER 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS C002 AREA PARCEL PLAN 10/13/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS DATE: C003 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN APPROVED BY: C004 OVERALL SITE PLAN APPLICANT: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: - RENEWABLE PROPERTIES, LLC - TBD C005 SITE PLAN VILLAGE MAYOR FOR PUD APPROVAL AND ITS AFFILIATE: RPNY SOLAR 4, LLC C006 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - 879 SANCHEZ ST DATE: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94114 C007 GRADING PLAN - CONTACT: STEPHANIE LOUCAS C008- C011 DETAILS I- DETAILS IV APPROVED BY: - PHONE: 415-710-3834 PLANNING BOARD CHAIRMAN CIVIL ENGINEER: - BERGMANN DATE: - 280 EAST BROAD STREET SUITE 200 APPROVED BY: ROCHESTER, NY 14604 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: - TBD - CONTACT: DAVID PLANTE - PHONE: 585.232.5135 DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND PLANNING DATE: PROJECT LOCATION MAP: 1" - 1000' PROJECT TOPOGRAPHIC MAP: 1" - 1000' APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND FIRE PREVENTION DATE: APPROVED BY: FIRE MARSHAL DATE: SITE LOCATION SITE LOCATION 01/01/2012 3:50:15 PM FINAL 1/31/2022 14919.11 Page59 RPN SOLAR 4 L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM 5986 CLEMONS RD VILLAGE OF MINOA 879 SANCHEZ ST SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. 280 East Broad Street Suite 200 Rochester, NY 14604 office: 585.232.5135 fax: 585.232.4652 www.bergmannpc.com DATE DESCRIPTION 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\001-General Notes and Legend.dwg Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C Project Manager: Checked By: ECR ECR Designed By: Drawn By: MDP MDP Date Issued: Project Number: 1/31/2022 14919.11 GENERAL NOTES . 10/14/2022 10:20 AM Drawing Number: C001 2 of 12 Page60 RPN SOLAR 4 L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM 5986 CLEMONS RD VILLAGE OF MINOA 879 SANCHEZ ST SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. 280 East Broad Street Suite 200 Rochester, NY 14604 office: 585.232.5135 fax: 585.232.4652 www.bergmannpc.com DATE DESCRIPTION 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS PROJECT LOCATION M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\002-Area Parcel Plan.dwg Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C Project Manager: Checked By: ECR ECR Designed By: Drawn By: PROPERTY MDP MDP OWNER TAX ID ADDRESS MUNICIPALITY ZONE Date Issued: Project Number: ID 1/31/2022 14919.11 CORNFLOWER 1 HOME OWNERS ASSOCAITION 067.-04-15.0 TOWN OF MANLIUS R-3 WAY 6007 CLEMONS 2 HOME OWNERS ASSOCAITION 067.-01-54.1 TOWN OF MANLIUS R-3 RD 3 EASTMAN, CHRISTOPHER C. & JILLIAN L. 067.-01-53.0 7420 RICHMOND RD TOWN OF MANLIUS R-A AREA PARCEL 4 BARTOLO, HOWARD J. & PATRICIA M. 067.-01-82.0 7423 RICHMOND RD TOWN OF MANLIUS R-A PLAN RACE IRREVOCABLE TRUST 5 067.-01-83.0 BAIRD ST TOWN OF MANLIUS R-A 10/14/2022 10:20 AM CLARICE MCCARTHY MARY HRYBINCZAK, ERIC M. & CHEN, 101 FOREST 6 005.-04-03.0 VILLAGE OF MINOA R-A Drawing Number: JOY J. VIEW LN C002 0 200 400 600 FT CUSHMAN, JORDAN W. & 100 NORBERT 7 CAPSTRAW, KARA N. 005.-02-01.0 VILLAGE OF MINOA R-A PL 1" = 200' SCALE BAR 8 STAIANO, MARIA A. & RALPH V. 04.-07-04.3 527 BAIRD ST VILLAGE OF MINOA R-B 3 of 12 LEGEND RPN SOLAR 4 L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM 5986 CLEMONS RD VILLAGE OF MINOA 409 410 408 408 879 SANCHEZ ST 408 410 415 410 415 SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 420 420 40 7 415 422 8 41 41 7 421 421 406 406 407 420 421 Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, 0 Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. 42 280 East Broad Street Suite 200 415 419 Rochester, NY 14604 420 office: 585.232.5135 5 fax: 585.232.4652 42 8 41 425 420 7 www.bergmannpc.com 42 5 41 DATE DESCRIPTION 421 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 415 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 420 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 41 43 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 5 0 0 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 41 419 420 40 5 43 5 44 0 44 5 45 0 5 40 406 M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\003-Existing Conditions Plan.dwg 40 5 410 420 5 420 41 42 425 425 435 440 430 0 450 42 45 445 5 0 40 4 420 405 404 405 5 40 420 420 420 405 406 415 410 445 440 409 435 430 425 6 40 420 406 420 406 5 41 Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, 408 Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C 7 40 0 41 Project Manager: Checked By: ECR ECR Designed By: Drawn By: MDP MDP Date Issued: Project Number: 1/31/2022 14919.11 407 EXISTING 0 41 CONDITIONS PLAN 10/14/2022 10:20 AM Drawing Number: C003 0 100 200 300 FT 1" = 100' SCALE BAR 4 of 12 Page62 LEGEND RPN SOLAR 4 L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM 5986 CLEMONS RD VILLAGE OF MINOA 879 SANCHEZ ST SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. 280 East Broad Street PROPOSED TRACKING SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS Suite 200 SOLAR ARRAY Rochester, NY 14604 SYSTEM SIZE DC 3,470.58 kW MODULE MANUFACTURER ASTRONERGY SOLAR office: 585.232.5135 fax: 585.232.4652 MODULE MODEL CHSM72M(DG)/F-BH MODULE RATING 540 W www.bergmannpc.com TOTAL MODULE QTY 6427 DATE DESCRIPTION RACKING ATI HSAT 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS PROPOSED PERIMETER FENCE INTER-ROW SPACING 11.1' 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS PITCH 18.5' 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS GCR 40% 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS SITE AREA INSIDE FENCE 12.4 AC PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD SITE IS LOCATED IN THE "PDD" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PROPOSED USE: SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM PARCEL 005.-10-01.0 VILLAGE OF MINOA, COUNTY OFONONDAGA STATE OF NEW YORK APPLICANT: OWNER(S) OF RECORD: RPNY SOLAR 4, LLC RC RALMONDO PROPERTIES LLC 897 SANCHEZ ST 46 PIER 7 SAN FRANCISCO,CA, 94114 CHARLESTOWN, MA, 02129 STEPHANIE@RENEWPROP.COM PLANS PREPARED BY: M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\004-Overall Site Plan.dwg BERGMANN LIMESTONE CREEK 280 EAST BROAD STREET, SUIT 200 ROCHESTER, NY, 14604 (585)-498-7877 DESCRIPTION PROPOSED MIN. LOT SIZE 10 ACRES MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK 45 FT MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK 10 FT MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK 10 FT MAX. HEIGHT LIMIT 15 FT MAX. LOT COVERAGE 35% Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C Project Manager: Checked By: ECR ECR Designed By: Drawn By: MDP MDP Date Issued: Project Number: 1/31/2022 14919.11 OVERALL SITE PLAN 10/14/2022 10:20 AM Drawing Number: C004 0 200 400 600 FT 1" = 200' SCALE BAR 5 of 12 Page63 LEGEND RPN SOLAR 4 L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM 5986 CLEMONS RD 10' SIDE SETBACK VILLAGE OF MINOA 879 SANCHEZ ST SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 86' PROPOSED TRACKING 50' SOLAR PANEL, TYP. 20', TYP. Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS 280 East Broad Street Suite 200 SYSTEM SIZE DC 3,470.58 kW Rochester, NY 14604 45' FRONT MODULE MANUFACTURER ASTRONERGY SOLAR SETBACK office: 585.232.5135 MODULE MODEL CHSM72M(DG)/F-BH fax: 585.232.4652 MODULE RATING 540 W PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SCREENING www.bergmannpc.com 57 EVERGREEN TREES AND 26 BUSHES TOTAL MODULE QTY 6427 RACKING ATI HSAT DATE DESCRIPTION INTER-ROW SPACING 11.1' 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS PROPOSED 7' PERIMETER FENCE, TYP. PITCH 18.5' 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS AREA = 12.4 AC. 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS GCR 40% 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS SITE AREA INSIDE FENCE 12.4 AC PROPOSED LIMITED USE PERVIOUS 44' GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD, TYP. 70' 49' RESTORE OR REPLACE EXISTING 12" HDPE CULVERT 10' REAR SETBACK PROPOSED OVERHEAD WIRE, TYP. PROPOSED LIMITED USE PERVIOUS GRAVEL PROPOSED 20' WIDE SELF PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD, TYP. PROPOSED LOCKING GATE WITH KNOX BOX UTILITY POLE, GUIDERAIL/BOULDERS FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS TYP. PROPOSED TREELINE, TYP. M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\005-Site Plan.dwg PROPOSED INTERCONNECTION TO EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING MATURE PROPOSED 12" HDPE VEGETATION TO REMAIN CULVERT, TYP. PROPOSED CONCRETE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE "PDD" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT EQUIPMENT PAD, TYP. PROPOSED USE: SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM PROPOSED 20' WIDE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND PROPOSED GRASS PARCEL 005.-10-01.0 SELF LOCKING GATE WIRE, TYP. FILTER STRIP, TYP. VILLAGE OF MINOA, COUNTY OFONONDAGA WITH KNOX BOX FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS STATE OF NEW YORK APPLICANT: OWNER(S) OF RECORD: RPNY SOLAR 4, LLC RC RALMONDO PROPERTIES LLC 897 SANCHEZ ST 46 PIER 7 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SCREENING 45' FRONT SAN FRANCISCO,CA, 94114 CHARLESTOWN, MA, 02129 57 EVERGREEN TREES SETBACK STEPHANIE@RENEWPROP.COM 11', TYP. PLANS PREPARED BY: 10' FRONT SETBACK FROM BERGMANN CLEMONS RD R.O.W. 280 EAST BROAD STREET, SUIT 200 ROCHESTER, NY, 14604 70' (585)-498-7877 45' DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 49' MIN. LOT SIZE 10 ACRES 34' 10' SIDE SETBACK MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK 45 FT MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK 10 FT 20' MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK 10 FT MAX. HEIGHT LIMIT 15 FT MAX. LOT COVERAGE 35% Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C Project Manager: Checked By: PROPOSED PERIMETER FENCE 1.0' OFF SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE ECR ECR Designed By: Drawn By: §66-2 PER VILLAGE OF MINOA CODE MDP MDP Date Issued: Project Number: 1/31/2022 14919.11 PLANT LIST SITE PLAN Mature Size Key Qty. Botanical Name Common Name Height Spread Installed Size Condition Spacing 10/14/2022 10:21 AM 57 Juniperus Virginiana Eastern Red Cedar 10'-25' 4'-10' 8' Ht. B&B 20' Drawing Number: C005 0 100 200 300 FT 26 Viburnum Dentatum Arrowood Viburnum 6'-10' 6'-10' 4'-5' Ht. Container 20' 1" = 100' SCALE BAR 6 of 12 Page64 LEGEND RPN SOLAR 4 L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM 5986 CLEMONS RD 10' SIDE SETBACK VILLAGE OF MINOA COMPOST FILTER SOCK TO BE LAID ALONG THE CONTOUR OF THE DOWNHILL SLOPE TO PROTECT THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES ON SITE 879 SANCHEZ ST PROPOSED 12" COMPOST SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 FILTER SOCK, TYP. PROPOSED TRACKING SOLAR PANEL, TYP. PROPOSED LIMIT OF Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, DISTURBANCE, TYP. Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. AREA =13.8 AC. 280 East Broad Street Suite 200 Rochester, NY 14604 45' FRONT SETBACK office: 585.232.5135 fax: 585.232.4652 PROPOSED LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE, TYP. AREA =13.8 AC. www.bergmannpc.com DATE DESCRIPTION 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS PROPOSED 7' PERIMETER FENCE, TYP. 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS AREA =13 AC. 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS RESTORE OR REPLACE EXISTING 12" HDPE CULVERT 10' REAR SETBACK PROPOSED INTERCONNECTION PROPOSED STABILIZED TO EXISTING UTILITY POLE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TYP. PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS PROPOSED LIMITED LOCATED HERE TO BE USE PERVIOUS GRAVEL INSTALLED AFTER TEMPORARY PROPOSED 12" HDPE STAGING AREA IS REMOVED PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD, TYP. CULVERT, TYP. UTILITY POLE, TYP. PROPOSED TREELINE, TYP. PROPOSED TEMPORARY 6000 SQFT STAGING AND PARKING AREA M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\006-E&SC Plan.dwg PROPOSED STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TYP. PROPOSED 12" END SECTION AND ROCK PROPOSED OUTLET PROTECTION, UNDERGROUND TYP. WIRE, TYP. PROPOSED TEMPORARY STOCKPILE AREA, TYP. 45' FRONT SETBACK PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SCREENING 57 EVERGREEN TREES 10' SIDE SETBACK Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C COMPOST FILTER SOCK TO BE LAID Project Manager: Checked By: PROPOSED PERIMETER FENCE 1.0' ALONG THE CONTOUR OF THE DOWNHILL ECR ECR OFF SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE SLOPE TO PROTECT THE EXISTING Designed By: Drawn By: ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES ON SITE MDP MDP Date Issued: Project Number: 1/31/2022 14919.11 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 10/14/2022 10:21 AM Drawing Number: C006 0 100 200 300 FT 1" = 100' SCALE BAR 7 of 12 Page65 11', TYP. PROPOSED TRACKING SOLAR PANEL, TYP. RPN SOLAR 4 L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SCREENING 57 EVERGREEN TREES AND 26 BUSHES 5986 CLEMONS RD VILLAGE OF MINOA 45' FRONT SETBACK 414 RESTORE OR REPLACE EXISTING 12" HDPE CULVERT 879 SANCHEZ ST 417 PROPOSED GUIDERAIL OR BOULDERS, TYP. SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 416 417 418 419 415 420 421 418.00 418.00 422 423 424 425 426 427 PROPOSED 12" END SECTION AND 428 429 ROCK OUTLET PROTECTION, TYP. PROPOSED LIMITED USE PERVIOUS Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, 430 Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. 432 GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD, TYP. 43 433 434 435 1 436 280 East Broad Street 437 41 438 439 PROPOSED GUIDERAIL 440 441 442 5 4 43 Suite 200 444 445 446 OR BOULDERS, TYP. 8 447 41 448 EXISTING MATURE 449 Rochester, NY 14604 450 451 416 452 VEGETATION TO REMAIN PROPOSED 50' STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TYP. office: 585.232.5135 45 417 45 45 1 fax: 585.232.4652 2 1 8 45 41 420 www.bergmannpc.com 2 PROPOSED UTILITY 417 PROPOSED 120 WIDE SELF LOCKING GATE DATE DESCRIPTION POLE, TYP. 435 416 42 415 WITH KNOX BOX FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 5 430 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 440 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 445 450 419 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 419 418 419.13 419.13 420 PROPOSED INTERCONNECTION TO EXISTING UTILITY POLE PROPOSED OVERHEAD WIRE, TYP. 42 42 1 418 2 42 0 441 450 449 448 447 446 445 444 443 442 440 439 436 PROPOSED PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SCREENING PROPOSED CONCRETE TREELINE, TYP. 57 EVERGREEN TREES EQUIPMENT PAD, TYP. 41 8 419 PROPOSED GRASS 420 PROPOSED FILTER STRIP, TYP. UNDERGROUND 420 PROPOSED 50' STABILIZED 444 421 WIRE, TYP. M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\007-Grading Plan.dwg CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TYP. 422 450 42 424 3 PROPOSED LIMITED USE PERVIOUS GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD, TYP. PROPOSED 7' PERIMETER FENCE, TYP. AREA =13 AC. PROPOSED 12" COMPOST FILTER SOCK, TYP. COMPOST FILTER SOCK TO BE LAID 41 8 450 448 447 430 429 449 431 450 427 426 441 440 436 442 444 443 439 43343 432 437 438 435 446 445 ALONG THE CONTOUR OF THE DOWNHILL 428 44 426 42287 9 4 SLOPE TO PROTECT THE EXISTING 4 428 427 426 ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES ON SITE 425 418 424 2 PROPOSED LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE, TYP. 42 4 419 423 42 AREA =13.8 AC. 422 420 2 42 421 420 420 PROPOSED LIMIT OF 45' FRONT SETBACK DISTURBANCE, TYP. AREA =13.8 AC. 10' 20' 420 420 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SCREENING 57 EVERGREEN TREES Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C Project Manager: Checked By: ECR ECR 44 Designed By: Drawn By: 7 MDP MDP Date Issued: Project Number: 1/31/2022 14919.11 420 420 420 419 418 417 GRADING PLAN 10/14/2022 10:21 AM 0 30 60 90 FT Drawing Number: C007 1" = 30' SCALE BAR 8 of 12 Page66 RPN SOLAR 4 L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM 5986 CLEMONS RD VILLAGE OF MINOA 879 SANCHEZ ST SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. 280 East Broad Street Suite 200 Rochester, NY 14604 office: 585.232.5135 fax: 585.232.4652 www.bergmannpc.com DATE DESCRIPTION 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 02 Speci ication Speci ication 01 01 May Vary May Vary 01 01 01 04 05 05 04 01 According According To The To The Speci ication May Vary According To The Manu acturer Manu acturer Manu acturer Speci ication May Vary According To The Manu acturer 24,0' M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\008-Details.dwg 04 04 04 03 03 7,0' 7,0' 11,0'-13,0' 03 03 11,0'-13,0' 0.00 0.00 The Terrain Conditions The Terrain Conditions Varia e According To Varia e According To 4,0'-5,0' 4,0'-5,0' Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C Project Manager: Checked By: ECR ECR Designed By: Drawn By: MDP MDP Date Issued: Project Number: 1/31/2022 14919.11 FRONT VIEW FRONT VIEW DETAILS I 01 CORNER POST 5"-6" or 6"-7" WITH BRACING FOR STABILITY 01 CORNER POST 5"-6" or 6"-7" WITH BRACING FOR STABILITY 02 LINE POST 5"-6" or 6"-7" 02 LINE POST 5"-6" or 6"-7" 03 BRACING CORNER POST 5"-6" or 6"-7" 03 BRACING CORNER POST 5"-6" or 6"-7" 04 FIXED-KNOT WOVEN GALVANIZED WIRE, BLACK, 10-12.5 GA. 04 FIXED-KNOT WOVEN WIRE 05 ACCESS GATE 05 ACCESS GATE 06 2" 2" WOOD STAKES 06 2" 2" WOOD STAKES 10/14/2022 10:21 AM 07 FIBER ROLL 9" 07 FIBER ROLL 9" Drawing Number: C008 9 of 12 Page67 RPN SOLAR 4 L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM 5986 CLEMONS RD VILLAGE OF MINOA 879 SANCHEZ ST SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. 280 East Broad Street Suite 200 Rochester, NY 14604 office: 585.232.5135 fax: 585.232.4652 www.bergmannpc.com DATE DESCRIPTION 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\008-Details.dwg Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C Project Manager: Checked By: ECR ECR Designed By: Drawn By: MDP MDP Date Issued: Project Number: 1/31/2022 14919.11 DETAILS II 10/14/2022 10:21 AM Drawing Number: C009 10 of 12 Page68 RPN SOLAR 4 L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM 5986 CLEMONS RD 15' MAX VILLAGE OF MINOA PIPE DIAMETER, in (mm) Diameter 12 15 18 24 30 36 in (mm) (300) (375) (450) (600) (750) (900) A 6.5 6.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 in (mm) (165) (165) (191) (191) (191) (191) B (ma ) 10.0 10.0 15.0 18.0 22.0 25.0 in (mm) (254) (254) (381) (475) (559) (635) 879 SANCHEZ ST H 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 8.6 8.6 SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 in (mm) (165) (165) (165) (165) (218) (218) L 25.0 25.0 32.0 36.0 58.0 58.0 in (mm) (635) (635) (813) (914) (1473) (1473) W 29.0 29.0 35.0 45.0 63.0 63.0 in (mm) (737) (737) (889) (1143) (1600) (1600) Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. 280 East Broad Street Suite 200 Rochester, NY 14604 office: 585.232.5135 fax: 585.232.4652 www.bergmannpc.com DATE DESCRIPTION 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\008-Details.dwg Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C Project Manager: Checked By: ECR ECR Designed By: Drawn By: MDP MDP Date Issued: Project Number: 1/31/2022 14919.11 DETAILS III 10/14/2022 10:21 AM Drawing Number: C010 11 of 12 Page69 Up and Seed Mi RPN SOLAR 4 L Lo -Gro ing Wi d o er & Grass Mi - ERNMX 156 Seeding Rate: 20 per acre ith a cover crop o grain rye at 30 per acre CLEMONS RD SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME % OF MIX SOLAR FARM Festuca ovina Sheep Fescue, Variety Not Stated 63.60% 5986 CLEMONS RD Lo ium mu ti orum (L. perenne var. ita icum) Annua Ryegrass 17% VILLAGE OF MINOA Linum perenne ssp. e isii Perennia B ue F a 8% Rud eckia hirta B ackeyed Susan, Coasta P ain NC Ecotype 2% Coreopsis anceo ata Lance ea Coreopsis, Coasta P ain NC Ecotype 2% Chrysanthemum eucanthemum O eye Daisy 2% Chrysanthemum ma imum Shasta Daisy 1% Chamaecrista ascicu ata (Cassia .) Partridge Pea, PA Ecotype 1% Papaver rhoeas, Shir ey Mi Corn Poppy/Shir ey Mi 1% 879 SANCHEZ ST Achi ea mi e o ium Common Yarro 0.5% SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 Aster o ongi o ius (Symphyotrichum o ongi o ium) Aromatic Aster, PA Ecotype 0.5% Eupatorium coe estinum (Conoc inium c.) Mist o er, VA Ecotype 0.5% Monarda punctata, Coasta P ain SC Ecotype Spotted Bee a m, Coasta P ain SC Ecotype 0.5% Asc epias tu erosa Butter y Mi k eed 0.3% Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Pycnanthemum tenui o ium S ender Mountainmint 0.1% Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. 280 East Broad Street Suite 200 Rochester, NY 14604 Company In ormation office: 585.232.5135 Ernst Conservation Seeds, Inc. fax: 585.232.4652 www.bergmannpc.com Address: 8884 Mercer Pike, Meadvi e, PA 16335 Phone: (800) 873-3321 DATE DESCRIPTION 3/23/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS We : http:// .ernstseed.com 4/14/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 4/22/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 6/2/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 8/30/2022 REVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS SOIL AMENDMENT APPLICATION RATE EQUIVALENTS PER 1,000 PER 1,000 SOIL AMENDMENT PER ACRE NOTES SQ. FT. SQ. YD. TEMPORARYPERMANENT AGRICULTURAL SEEDING 6 TONS 240 LB. 2,480 LB. OR AS PER SOIL TEST: LIME MAY NOT BE 10-10-20 REQUIRED IN 1,000 L.B. 25 LB. 210 LB. AGRICULTURAL FIELDS FERTILIZER AGRICULTURAL SEEDING 1 TON 40 LB. 410 LB. TYPICALLY NOT LIME REQUIRED FOR 10-10-20 TOPSOIL STOCKPILES 500 LB. 12.5 LB. 100 LB. FERTILIZER M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\008-Details.dwg COMPOST STANDARDS ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT 80% - 100% (DRY WEIGHT BASIS) ORGANIC PORTION FIBROUS AND ELONGATED pH 5.5 - 8.0 MOISTURE CONTENT 35% - 55% PARTICLE SIZE 98% PASS THROUGH 1" SCREEN SOLUBLE SALT CONCENTRATION 5.0 dS/m (mmhos/cm) MAXIMUM MULCH APPLICATION RATES APPLICATION RATE (MIN.) MULCH TYPE PER 1,000 PER 1,000 NOTES PER ACRE SQ. FT. SQ. YD. EITHER WHEAT OR OAT STRAW, FREE OF STRAW 3 TONS 140 LB. 1,240 LB. WEEDS, NOT CHOPPED OR FINELY BROKEN TIMOTHY, MIXED CLOVER AND TIMOTHY, HAY 3 TONS 140 LB. 1,240 LB. OR OTHER NATIVE FORAGE GRASSES Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C DO NOT USE ALONE IN WINTER, DURING HOT Project Manager: Checked By: WOOD CELLULOSE 1,500 LB. 35 LB. 310 LB. AND DRY WEATHER OR ECR ECR ON STEEP SLOPES Designed By: Drawn By: ( 3:1) MDP MDP Date Issued: Project Number: 1,000 LB. WHEN USED OVER 1/31/2022 14919.11 WOOD 25 LB. 210 LB. STRAW OR HAY CELLULOSE MAY PREVENT GERMINATION OF 1,650 - 2,500 LB. WOOD CHIPS 4 - 6 TONS 185 - 275 LB. GRASSES AND LEGUMES DETAILS IV 10/14/2022 10:21 AM Drawing Number: C011 12 of 12 Page70 LEGEND RPNY SOLAR 4, L CLEMONS RD SOLAR FARM 5986 CLEMONS RD VILLAGE OF MINOA 879 SANCHEZ ST SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94114 Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C. 280 East Broad Street Suite 200 OPEN SPACE, Rochester, NY 14604 WETLAND, AND office: 585.232.5135 FLOOD PLAIN fax: 585.232.4652 PROTECTION AREA ±27.7 AC. www.bergmannpc.com DATE DESCRIPTION N/F RC RAIMONDO PROPERTIES LLC SBL# 005.-10-01.0 5986 CLEMONS RD VILLAGE OF MINOA CURRENT ZONE: R-A1 PROPOSED ZONE: PDD AREA 41.9 AC. SOLAR DEVELOPMENT AREA ±14.2 AC. M:\Renewable Properties, LLC\014919.11 Renewable Properties-RPNY Clemons Rd Sol\4.0 Dwgs\4.1 Civil\00X-PDD Plan.dwg Copyright © Bergmann Associates, Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects & Surveyors, D.P.C Project Manager: Checked By: PROPERTY ECR ECR OWNER TAX ID ADDRESS MUNICIPALITY ZONE AREA ID Designed By: Drawn By: MDP MDP CORNFLOWER 1 HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION 067.-04-15.0 TOWN OF MANLIUS R-3 3.6 AC. Date Issued: Project Number: WAY 12/30/2021 14919.11 6007 CLEMONS 2 HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION 067.-01-54.1 TOWN OF MANLIUS R-3 5.7 AC. RD EASTMAN, CHRISTOPHER C. & 7420 3 067.-01-53.0 TOWN OF MANLIUS R-A 0.8 AC. JILLIAN L. RICHMOND RD 4 BARTOLO, HOWARD J. & PATRICIA M. 067.-01-82.0 7423 RICHMOND RD TOWN OF MANLIUS R-A 0.8 AC. CLEMONS SOLAR PDD 5 RACE IRREVOCABLE TRUST CLARICE MCCARTHY MARY 067.-01-83.0 BAIRD ST TOWN OF MANLIUS R-A 2.5 AC. CONCEPT PLAN HRYBINCZAK, ERIC M. & CHEN, 101 FOREST 6 005.-04-03.0 VILLAGE OF MINOA R-A 1.5 AC. 12/29/2021 12:21 PM JOY J. VIEW LN CUSHMAN, JORDAN W. & 100 NORBERT 7 CAPSTRAW, KARA N. 005.-02-01.0 VILLAGE OF MINOA R-A 1.1 AC. Drawing Number: PL PDD-1 0 200 400 600 FT 8 STAIANO, MARIA A. & RALPH V. 04.-07-04.3 527 BAIRD ST VILLAGE OF MINOA R-B 1.0 AC. 5990 CLEMONS 1" = 200' SCALE BAR 9 GAETANO, LOUIS V. 067.-01-79.0 TOWN OF MANLIUS R-A 0.4 AC. RD 1 of 1 Page72 PROJECT FEAF Page73 Page74 Page75 Page76 Page77 Page78 Page79 Page80 Page81 Page82 Page83 Page84 Page85 SEQR DETERMINATION Page86 Page87 Page88 Page89 PDD & PROJECT SITE PLAN APPROVAL RESOLUTION Page90 Page91 Page92 Page93 Page94 Page95 Page96 Page97 Page98 Page99 Page100 TAXING JURISDICTIONS PILOT LETTERS OF SUPPORT Page101 Page102 Page103 Page104 ÿÿÿ 7ÿ7 9ÿ6ÿ7ÿ7 ÿ 32413 ÿ3ÿ!"ÿ #ÿ$%&'()*+',ÿ+,.+/0*+,1ÿ*2%ÿ/'),*3ÿ'4ÿ',',.0105&ÿ',1'+,1ÿ+,*%,*ÿ*'ÿ 61ÿ#ÿ73 4#74ÿ83ÿ0#87 4ÿ1ÿ21ÿ38ÿ4#9ÿ83ÿ32#ÿ# :ÿ;1:ÿ  <8ÿ847ÿ0# 4ÿ43ÿ#2ÿ03048ÿ4#9ÿ2#;ÿ7413 ÿ=">?@>6@ÿ ;A#ÿBCÿÿDÿ8ÿÿ0Bÿ4 Eÿ2DÿFÿ="ÿÿGÿH ÿIÿÿCÿÿ D9ÿJÿCCHÿCÿ9K9ÿLÿ9ÿHJÿLÿIHCÿKÿCM9NCÿKÿLKÿÿÿ ÿÿGGÿKÿBHCÿÿÿKÿECÿ>01234@ÿBN99ÿLÿGÿKÿLÿDÿÿ9NBÿÿ DJÿKÿCÿÿÿIÿÿ01234ÿDLÿCEÿ>O@ÿ9CÿKÿGNJÿDÿKGPÿ9ÿ ;A#ÿDÿ8ÿÿ0Bÿ4 Eÿ2DÿFÿ=">?@>M@ÿDCÿKÿLÿ9BÿKÿÿCÿ QRÿSTUVÿ'WXWYZ[Zÿ/X\WSRÿ(][UV^ZS\_]ÿUWYÙZSUW[ÿST]ÿ/X\WSR5VÿXW[XUW[ÿUWS]WSÿSXÿ_]a\U_]ÿb+('*&ÿcX_ÿV\`Tÿ Cÿ9ÿD9ÿJÿCCHCÿDLGLÿCÿCLÿCCKÿLÿKC9ÿCEÿ>O@ÿ9ÿGÿIHÿ ÿDCÿÿ9NBCÿ9ÿÿKLÿGÿCÿI9ÿÿLÿBÿKÿ39Jÿ7PÿDÿLKÿ Mÿÿ 32d:ÿLÿLCÿCÿKKGNÿHH9ÿCLÿCNÿCÿGÿKÿLÿ7ÿKÿ 'WXWYZ[Z5VÿXW[XUW[ÿUWS]WSÿSXÿ]WS]_ÿUWSXÿb+('*ÿZ[_]]e]WSVÿcX_ÿVX^Z_ÿZWYÿfUWYÿ]W]_[RÿVRVS]eVÿfLÿLÿ 7ÿBCÿÿDÿ8ÿÿ0Bÿ4Eÿ2DÿFÿ=">?@>M@Pÿ9ÿMÿÿKLÿ 32d:ÿLÿLÿ7ÿEGNÿCÿLg9ÿÿEGÿJHCÿ9ÿCGLÿLÿ 9GHCÿCÿH ÿMÿCMÿGCCÿÿHBHÿLÿÿKÿLCÿCÿ #:304:ÿhhÿ 1ÿLMÿGKÿLÿLÿKJJÿCÿÿÿ9ÿEGÿGBÿ KÿLÿJCÿ9ÿ9B9LÿMÿLÿ7ÿ2JCÿ Kÿ39Jÿ7ÿÿLÿ ÿ9ÿKÿÿÿ 7ÿ7ÿ2JCÿ 01234ÿÿÿÿ678ÿÿÿÿ9 ÿÿÿ Page105 0123ÿ56ÿ7877ÿ ÿ 9 99 2  92 9ÿ 3 9ÿ 9ÿ 9 ÿ 19 ÿ 234ÿ678 3 3 1 9 8 29   7  19 ! 223 5 "2   # 19 !1 5 3 "  7 $2 3  2ÿ ÿ 8ÿ 8ÿ 8ÿ %&%%ÿ()((*+,ÿ-+.)ÿ./001ÿ Page106 BERGMANN HAS JOINED COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN APPENDIX B Photo Documentation of Pre-Construction Conditions RPNY Solar 4, LLC - Clemons Road Solar Project - August 2022 Page107 PRNY Solar 4, LLC – Clemons Road Solar Project September 9, 2021 & October 5, 2021 Village of Minoa, Onondaga County, New York Photo 1: Palustrine emergent wetland (PEM), facing north. Photo 2: Palustrine emergent wetland (PEM), facing east. Page108 PRNY Solar 4, LLC – Clemons Road Solar Project September 9, 2021 & October 5, 2021 Village of Minoa, Onondaga County, New York Photo 3: Palustrine emergent wetland (PEM), facing south. Photo 4: Palustrine emergent wetland (PEM), facing east. Page109 PRNY Solar 4, LLC – Clemons Road Solar Project September 9, 2021 & October 5, 2021 Village of Minoa, Onondaga County, New York Photo 5: Palustrine forested wetland (PFO), facing east. Photo 6: Palustrine forested wetland (PFO), facing north. Page110 PRNY Solar 4, LLC – Clemons Road Solar Project September 9, 2021 & October 5, 2021 Village of Minoa, Onondaga County, New York Photo 7: Representative upland habitat, facing north. Photo 8: Representative upland habitat, facing east. Page111 PRNY Solar 4, LLC – Clemons Road Solar Project September 9, 2021 & October 5, 2021 Village of Minoa, Onondaga County, New York Photo 9: Representative upland habitat, facing east. Photo 10: Representative upland habitat, facing east. Page112 Page113 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Project Summary Draft 4/10/2023 1. Project PBFF Drakes LLC 2. Project Number 3101-23-02A 3. Location Lysander 4. School District Baldwinsville 5. Tax Parcel(s) 075.-03-24.7 6. Project Type Construction 7.Total Project Cost $ 43,571,000 8. Total Jobs 3 Land $ 465,000 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ 350,000 8B: Job Creation 3 Building $ 36,000,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ 250,000 Equipment $ 335,000 Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 121,000 Financial Charges $ - Legal Fees $ - Other $ 650,000 Management/Developer Fees $ 5,400,000 Community Investment /Abatement Summary Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Abatement Summary $3,057,660 Sales Tax Abatement $1,526,840 Mortgage Tax Abatement $258,750 Applicant proposes to transform a vacant 22.1 acre parcel into a residentail apartment complex consisting of 6 apartment Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $1,272,070 buildings, each 3 stories totaling approximately 34,000 SF and Community Investment $56,637,646 containing 27 apts consisting of 6 one-bedroom, 17 two- PILOT Payments 10 yrs $1,234,446 bedroom, 4 three-bedroom and 60 garages with each building. Project Wages (10 yrs) $1,385,000 There will be 3000 SF clubhouse, and 60 disconnected garage Construction Benefit $10,447,200 units in 12 buildings, each having 5 garage units. There will be a total of 120 garages. A 2000 SF maintenance building is also Employee Benefits (10 years) $0 proposed. Total Project Cost $43,571,000 Investment:Abatement Ratio 18.52 Page114 PBFF Drakes LLC DRAFT for 10 years OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 412,500 Projected investment $ 36,000,000 OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 8,000,000 OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 8,412,500 Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 122,905 Scheduled PILOT payments $ 1,234,446 County PILOT School Full Tax Payment PILOT YEAR Exemption % Town Total PILOT Net Exemption Amount District w/o PILOT 1 100% $ 1,846.34 $ 701.85 $ 8,676.29 $ 11,224.48 $ 228,911.41 $ 217,686.92 2 90% $ 5,535.65 $ 2,104.28 $ 26,013.11 $ 33,653.04 $ 233,489.63 $ 199,836.60 3 80% $ 9,371.80 $ 3,562.53 $ 44,039.92 $ 56,974.25 $ 238,159.43 $ 181,185.18 4 70% $ 13,359.17 $ 5,078.26 $ 62,777.40 $ 81,214.84 $ 242,922.61 $ 161,707.77 5 60% $ 17,502.30 $ 6,653.20 $ 82,246.77 $ 106,402.27 $ 247,781.07 $ 141,378.80 6 50% $ 21,805.81 $ 8,289.11 $ 102,469.80 $ 132,564.71 $ 252,736.69 $ 120,171.98 7 40% $ 26,274.45 $ 9,987.79 $ 123,468.85 $ 159,731.09 $ 257,791.42 $ 98,060.33 8 30% $ 30,913.12 $ 11,751.10 $ 145,266.87 $ 187,931.10 $ 262,947.25 $ 75,016.15 9 20% $ 35,726.83 $ 13,580.95 $ 167,887.43 $ 217,195.21 $ 268,206.20 $ 51,010.99 10 10% $ 40,720.72 $ 15,479.29 $ 191,354.71 $ 247,554.72 $ 273,570.32 $ 26,015.60 TOTAL $ 203,056.19 $ 77,188.37 $ 954,201.14 $ 1,234,445.70 $ 2,506,516.02 $ 1,272,070.32 Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Jobs 2 1 Current/Actua ls Creation Goals 0 Total Employment Goals 0 0 2 1 0 0 Project Tax Billing and Payment Schedule 1. Anticipated PILOT filing date is Q1 2024 2. Applicant will received a 2024 Town and County Tax bill in Januay 2024 3. Applicant will receive a 2023-24 School Bill in Sepetmber Sep-23 in 2023 4. Applicant will not receive a Town and County Tax bill in 2025 5. Applicant will not receive a 2024-25 School tax bill 6. Applicant will receive an OCIDA PILOT Bill Year 1 in January 2025 Please contact OCIDA staff with any questions. Property of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency, All Rights Reserved Page115 ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPLICATION FOR BENEFITS 1. In accordance with Section 224-a(8)(d) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law, the Agency has identified that any “financial assistance” (within the meaning of Section 858 of the General Municipal Law) granted by the Agency to the Applicant consisting of sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax exemption benefits and real property tax exemption benefits, constitutes “public funds” within the meaning of Section 224-a(2)(b) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law and such funds are not excluded under Section 224-a(3) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law. The Agency hereby notifies the Applicant of the Applicant’s obligations under Section 224-a (8)(a) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law. 2. Fill in all blanks using “none”, “not applicable” or “not available”. If you have any questions about the way to respond, please call the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (the “Agency” or “OCIDA”) at 315-435-3770. 3. If providing an estimate put “(est.)” after the figure or answer. If more space is needed to answer any specific question, attach a separate sheet. 4. If the OCIDA Board approves benefits, it is the company’s responsibility to obtain and submit all necessary forms and documents. 5. All projects approved for benefits by the OCIDA Board will close with the Agency within 6-months of the inducement date. If this schedule cannot be met, the applicant will need to submit a closing schedule modification written request to the Executive Director that will be presented to OCIDA Board for consideration. 6. When completed, return this Application by mail or fax to the Agency at the address indicated below. A signed application may also be submitted electronically in PDF format to Nancy Lowery at nancylowery@ongov.net. An Application will not be considered by the Agency until the Application fee has been received. 7. The Agency will not give final approval for this Application until the Agency receives a completed NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form concerning the project which is the subject of this Application. The form is available at http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html. 8. Please note the Public Officers Law declares all records in the possession of the OCIDA (with certain limited exceptions) are open to public inspection and copying. If the Applicant is of the opinion that there are elements of the project which are in the nature of trade secrets which, if disclosed to the public or otherwise widely disseminated, would cause substantial injury to the Applicant’s competitive position, this Applicant must identify such elements in writing and request that such elements be kept confidential. In accordance with Article 6 of the Public Officer’s Law, the OCIDA may also redact personal, private, and/or proprietary information from publicly disseminated documents. 9. The Applicant will be required to pay the Agency Application fee and, if accepted as a project of the Agency, all administrative and legal fees as stated in Section VI of the Application. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 1 Page116 10. A complete Application consists of the following 9 items:  This Application  Local Access Agreement  Employment Plan  Conflict of Interest  A feasibility statement indicating the need for the requested benefits  Description of Project, Site Plans/Sketches, and Maps  NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form  A check payable to the Agency in the amount of $1,000  A check payable to Barclay Damon LLP in the amount of $2,500 11. This Application was adopted by the OCIDA Board on January 18, 2022. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 2 Page117 It is the policy of the Agency that any project receiving benefits from the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency will utilize 100% local contractors and local labor for the construction period of the project unless a waiver is granted in writing by the Agency. Return to: Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Attn: Nancy Lowery 335 Montgomery Street, 2nd Floor Syracuse, NY 13202 Phone: 315-435-3770 | Fax: 315-435-3669 nancylowery@ongov.net Section I: Applicant Information Please answer all questions. Use “None”, “Not Applicable” and “See Attached” where necessary. Submittal Date: _____________ March 1, 2023 A) Applicant/Project Operator information (company receiving benefits): Applicant/Project Operator: Click here to enter text. PBFF Drakes LLC Applicant/ Project Operator Address: 8927 Center Pointe Drive, Baldwinsville, NY 13027 Phone: 315 638-3801 Fax: 315 638-3802 Website: E-mail: favafj@gmail.com Federal ID#: 84-3873510 NAICS: State and Year of Incorporation/Organization: __________________________________________ New York - March 5, 2019 Owner (if different from Applicant/Project Operator): ____________________________________ Owner Address: Federal ID#: State and Year of Incorporation/Organization: List of stockholders, members, or partners of Owner: ________________________________________________________________________________ B) Individual Completing Application: Name: Frank Fava Title: Member Address: 15043 Lure Trail, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Phone: 315 575-1664 Fax: E-mail: Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 1 Page118 C) Company Contact (if different from individual completing application): Name: Title: Address: Phone: Cell Phone: E-mail: D) Company Counsel: Name of Attorney: Tim Fitzgerald, Esq. Firm Name: Harris Beach Address: 99 Garnsey Rd., Pittrsford, NY 14534 Phone: 585-419-8967 Cell Phone: E-mail: tfitzgerald@harrisbeach.com E) Business Organization (check appropriate category): ☐ Corporation ☐Partnership ☐ Public Corporation ☐Joint Venture ☐ Sole Proprietorship ☐Limited Liability Company ☐ Other (please specify): Year Established: 2019 State in which Organization is established: New York F) List all stockholders, members, or partners with % of ownership greater than 5%: Name % of ownership Frank Fava 50% Patrick Basset 50% Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 2 Page119 G) Applicant Business Description: Estimated % of sales within Onondaga County: ________________________________________ 100 Estimated % of sales outside Onondaga County but within New York State: 0 Estimated % of sales outside New York State but within the U.S.: 0 Estimated % of sales outside the U.S.: 0 (*Percentage to equal 100%) H) Applicant History: If the answer to any of the following is “Yes”, please explain below. If necessary, attach additional information. 1. Is the company or management of the Company now a ☐Yes ☐No plaintiff or defendant in any civil or criminal litigation? 2. Has any person listed above ever been convicted of a criminal offense (other than a minor traffic violation)? ☐Yes ☐No 3. Has any person listed in Section I ever been in receivership or declared bankruptcy? Please attach any explanations. ☐Yes ☐No I) Has the Project Beneficiary received assistance from OCIDA, Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (SIDA), New York State or the Onondaga Civic Development Corporation (OCDC) in the past? If yes please attach an explanation and please give year, project name, and description of benefits and address of project. ☐Yes ☐No Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 3 Page120 Section II: Project and Site Information A) Project Location: Location where the investment will take place. If Company is moving, the new location should be entered here and the current location should be in Section I. Address: 3285 Belgium Rd. Legal Address (if different): City: Syracuse Village/Town: Lysander Zip Code: 13027 School District: Baldwinsville Tax Map Parcel ID(s): 075.-03-24.7 Full Market Value: ________________ $412,500 Footage of Existing Building: _________________ 0 Census Tract: ___________________________________________________________________ B) Type (Check all that apply): ☐New construction ☐Purchase of machinery and/or equipment ☐Expansion/Addition to current facilities ☐Brownfield/Remediated Brownfield ☐Renovation of existing facility ☐LEED Certification ☐ Housing Project ☐Demolition and Construction ☐ Renewable Energy Project ☐Acquisition of existing facility/property ☐ Retail ☐Other: C) Project Narrative: A statement that there is a likelihood that the project would not be undertaken but for the financial assistance provided by the Agency or, if the project could be undertaken without financial assistance provided by the Agency, a statement indicating why the project should be undertaken by the agency. * For a Retail Project (also see page 14) * For a Renewable Energy Project (also see page 15) * For a Housing Project (also see page 17) D) Description of Project: Please provide a detailed narrative of the proposed Project. Please separately attach the description and any copies of site plans, sketches or maps. This narrative should include, but is not limited to: ☐ i) a description of your Company’s background, customers, goods and services and the principal products to be produced and/or the principal activities that will occur on the Project site; ☐ (ii) the size of the Project in square feet and a breakdown of square footage per each intended use; ☐ (iii) the size of the lot upon which the Project sits or is to be constructed; ☐ (iv) the current use of the site and the intended use of the site upon completion of the Project; ☐ (vi) describe your method for site control (Own, lease, other). Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 4 Page121 E) Select Project type for all end users at Project site (you may check more than one): **Please check any and all end users as identified below ☐ Industrial ☐Bank Office ☐ Acquisition of Existing Facility ☐Retail ( see page 14) ☐ Housing Project ( see page 17 ) ☐Mixed Use ☐ Equipment Purchase ☐Facility for Aging ☐ Multi-Use Tenant ☐Civic Facility (not for profit) ☐ Renewable Energy Project ( see page 15) ☐Other ______________________ ☐ Commercial F) If applicant will not occupy 100% of the building in a real estate transaction, provide information on tenant(s) that includes name, present address, and percentage of project to be leased, type of business organization, relationship to applicant, date and term of lease. G) For the Agency to consider this Project, please provide the following information: 1. Does the Project consist of new construction or expansion or substantial renovation of an existing facility? ☐Yes ☐No 2. Will the Project create new employment opportunities or retain existing jobs that may otherwise be lost? ☐Yes ☐No 3. Does the Project beneficiary serve a customer base primarily outside of Onondaga County? ☐Yes ☐No H) Will the completion of the Project result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the company from one area of the state to another area of the state OR in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the company located within the state? Please explain if you answer “Yes” by attaching a response. ☐Yes ☐No I) Please attach a description of any compelling circumstances the Agency should be aware of while reviewing this application. J) Local Approvals (Site Plan and Environmental Review) 1. Have site plans been submitted to the appropriate town or local planning department? ☐Yes. What is the status? ☐No. When will the plans be submitted? _______________________________________________________ Site Plan Approval from the Town of Lysander attached. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 5 Page122 2. Has the project received site plan approval from the town or local planning board? ☐Yes ☐No 3. If no, what is the anticipated approval date? ________________________________ 4. If yes, provide the Agency with a copy of the Planning Board’s approval resolution along with the related SEQR determination. (NOTE: SEQR determination is required for final approval and sales tax agency appointment.) 5. Environmental Information a. Please attach the appropriate Environmental Impact Forms to your application. Here is a link to the SEQR forms: http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6191.html b. Have any environmental issues been identified on the property? ☐Yes ☐No If yes, please attach an explanation. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 6 Page123 Section III: Construction A) Project Costs and Finances Description of Costs Total % of Total Total Private Expenditure Budget Budget to be (should be less than or Amount Procured in equal to total budget Onondaga amount) County Land Acquisition $465,000 100% $465,000 Site Work/Demo $350,000 100% $350,000 Building Construction & Renovation $36,000,000 100% $36,000,000 Furniture & Fixtures $250,000 TBD $250,000 Equipment* $335,000 TBD $335,000 Engineering/Architect $121,000 TBD $121,000 sFinancial Charges TBD TBD TBD Legal TBD TBD TBD Other $650,000 100% $650,000 Management/Developer Fees $5,400,000 100% $5,400,000 Total Project Cost $43,571,000* 75% $43,571,000* *Amounts in the table reflect the best estimates as this time, and are subject to change. Note: Do not include OCIDA fees, OCIDA application fees or OCIDA legal fees as part of the Total Project Cost. You may attach a separate chart if needed. B) TOTAL Capital Costs $ 43,571,000 Project refinancing: estimated amount (For refinancing of existing debt only) $ Sources of Funds for Project Costs: 1. Bank Financing $ _______________ 34,500,000 2. Equity (excluding equity that is attributed to grants/tax credits) $ 9,071,000 3. Tax Exempt Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ _______________ 4. Taxable Bond Issuance (if applicable) $ Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 7 Page124 5. Public Sources (Include sum total of all state and federal grants and tax credits) $ -Identify each state and federal grant/credit: $ $ $ 6. Total Sources of Funds for Project Costs $ _______________ 43,571,000 C) Employment and Payroll Information 1. A full time, permanent, private sector employee on the Company’s payroll, who has worked at the project location for a minimum of thirty hours per week for not less than four consecutive weeks and who is entitled to receive the usual and customary fringe benefits extended by Company to other employees with comparable rank, duties and hours; or 2. Up to three part time, permanent, private-sector employees on Company’s payroll, who have worked at the project location for a combined minimum of thirty hours per week for not less than four consecutive weeks and who are entitled to receive the usual and customary fringe benefits extended by Company to other employees with comparable rank, duties and hours. 1. Are there people currently employed at the project site? ☐Yes ☐No If yes, provide number of FTE jobs at the facility: 2. Complete the following: Estimate the number of FTE jobs to be retained as a result of this Project: 3 Estimate the number of construction jobs to be created by this Project: 60 Estimate the average length of construction jobs to be created (months): 48 Current annual payroll at facility: 0 Please list, if any, benefits that will be available to either full and/or part time employees: Average annual benefit paid by the company ($ or % salary) per FTE job: Amount or percent of wage employees pay for benefits: Provide an estimate of the number of residents in the Economic Development Region (Onondaga, Madison, Cayuga, Oneida, Oswego, and Cortland Counties) to fill new FTE jobs: 100% Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 8 Page125 D) New Employment Benefits i. Complete the following chart indicating the number of FTE jobs presently employed at the Project and the number of FTE jobs that will be created at the Project site at the end of the first, second, and third, years after the Project is completed. Jobs should be listed by title of category (see below), including FTE independent contractors or employees of independent contractors that work at the Project location. Do not include construction workers. ii. Feel free to include additional information or a substitute chart if you think additional material would add clarity. Please use this chart to illustrate the current employment: Job Title/Category Current Annual Pay Current Employment (FTE) Please use this chart to illustrate the projected employment growth: Job Title/Category Current Annual Pay Jobs Created Jobs Created Jobs Created Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Leasing Director approximately $50,000 0 1* 0 Service Technician $52,000 - $55,000 0 1* 1* *The jobs will be created following completion of the Facility. If you prefer, you may attach a job chart of your own that outlines the job growth projections regarding the Project. E) Financial Assistance sought (estimated values): ☐ Real Property Tax Abatement (PILOT): ☐ Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption (.75% of amount mortgaged): $258,750 ☐ Sales and Use Tax Exemption (4% Local, 4% State): $1,526,840 ☐ Tax Exempt Bond Financing (Amount Requested): ☐ Taxable Bond Financing (Amount Requested): Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 9 Page126 F) Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption Benefit Calculator: Amount of mortgage that would be subject to mortgage recording tax: Mortgage Amount (include sum total of construction/permanent/ bridge financing): $ 34,500,000 Estimated Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption Benefit (product of mortgage amount as indicated above, multiplied by .0075): $ 258,750 G) Sales and Use Tax Benefit Calculator: Gross amount of costs for goods and services that are subject to State and local Sales and Use Tax – said amount to benefit from the Agency’s Sales and Use Tax exemption benefit: $ 19,085,500 Estimated State and local Sales and Use Tax Benefit (product of 8% multiplied by the figure, above) (This should match the amount in section “E” on page 9, this calculation only exists to help you with your estimate): $ 1,526,840 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 10 Page127 Section IV: Estimate of Real Property Tax Abatement Benefits Section IV of this Application will be: (i) completed by IDA Staff based upon information contained within the Application, and (ii) provided to the Applicant for ultimate inclusion as part of this completed Application prior to the completed application being provided to the OCIDA Board. A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet OCIDA estimate of current value New construction and renovation costs OCIDA estimate of increase in value OCIDA estimated value of completed project OCIDA estimate of taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur Scheduled PILOT payments PILOT Exemption County Local School Total Full Tax Net Exemption Year % PILOT PILOT PILOT PILOT Payment Amount Amount Amount w/o PILOT 1 100 2 90 3 80 4 70 5 60 6 50 7 40 8 30 9 20 10 10 TOTAL Estimates provided are based on current property tax rates and assessment value (current as of date of application submission) and have been calculated by IDA staff. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 11 Page128 SECTION: V ForProjects For Retail Retail Projects Only Only Tax 1. Will the cost of the retail portion of the Project exceed one-third of the total project cost? ☐Yes ☐No 2. Is the Project located in a distressed area? A distressed area is a census tract that has a) a poverty rate of a least 20% or at least 20% of households receiving public assistance, and (b) an unemployment rate of least 1.25 times the statewide unemployment rate for the year to which the date relates. ☐Yes ☐No 3. Is the Project likely to attract a significant number of visitors from outside of the economic development region? ☐Yes ☐No 4. Is the predominate purpose of the Project to make available goods or services which would not, but for the Project, be reasonably accessible to the residents of the Town, City, County or Village of where the Project will be located. ☐Yes ☐No Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 12 Page129 SECTION VI: For Solar Projects Only Please complete the following as an addendum: P X, an 1. Describe the reasons why the Agency’s financial assistance is necessary. Describe how the Project would be affected if these benefits were not provided. [see Section II (C)] 2. Is the applicant leasing the property? ☐ Yes, please provide a copy of the lease ☐ No, purchased the property. Please provide documentation. 3. Has the applicant provided written communication to the affected taxing jurisdictions notifying them of its intent to construct a renewable energy project? ☐ Yes ☐ No 4. Has the applicant received a letter of support for the megawatt cost to be used as a basis for the PILOT from the town, city or village where the Project is located? ☐ Yes. Please provide copy. ☐ No 5. Has the applicant received a letter of support for the megawatt cost to be used as a basis for PILOT from the school district? ☐ Yes. Please provide copy. ☐ No 6. Is the entire parcel being used for the solar project? ☐ Yes ☐ No, if not, have you reached out to the town assessor to discuss a subdivision or slash parcel? Explain: ___________________________________________ 7. Will the applicant enter into a decommissioning plan with the host community, including financial assurance the plan can be executed? ☐ Yes, explain. ☐ No *PLEASE SEE FOLLOWING PAGE FOR OCIDA SOLAR GUIDANCE & BEST PRACTICE Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 13 Page130 OCIDA Solar PILOTs Guidance and Best Practice OCIDA SOLAR PILOTs GUIDANCE AND BEST PRACTICE To be placed on the OCIDA meeting agenda, proposed solar projects must provide OCIDA with the following in advance of the Project’s first OCIDA meeting: 1. Fully completed OCIDA application. 2. Copy of Environmental Assessment Form. 3. A SEQR resolution approved by a local municipality indicating municipality will be lead agency, the type of action (I, II, or unlisted) and, if completed, the SEQR determination made by the municipality. 4. Copies of your zoning applications submitted to the local municipality. 5. Verification of parcel subdivision process with the town (if the entire parcel will not be used for the solar project). 6. A statement clarifying whether the applicant will lease or purchase the real property on which the Project is situated. If leased, provide a copy of the proposed or executed lease. If lease parcel is less then entire parcel then see 5 above. 7. A supporting document from the School District and the Town Board outlining the agreed upon cost per megawatt to be used as a basis for the PILOT. OCIDA cannot create the PILOT schedule without this information. 8. Absent a showing otherwise by the Company, deemed acceptable by the Agency in the sole and absolute discretion, the Company must close with the Agency on a project prior to consideration of any requested organizational structure or project entity ownership changes. You will receive a draft Cost Benefit Analysis and a Draft PILOT schedule from this office. You may use these documents as your Project progresses through the OCIDA approval process. OCIDA staff are available to update these two documents as needed. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 14 Page131 SECTION VII: For Housing Projects Only Please complete the following as an addendum: 1. Describe the reasons why the Agency’s financial assistance is necessary. Describe how the project would be impacted if these benefits were not provided. [see Section II (C)] 2. Is the Project being built in a blighted area? Please describe. 3. Is the Project fulfilling an unmet need in the area? Please explain. 4. Please provide a market study documenting a need for such housing. 5. Is there support from local government officials for the Project and for the financial assistance being requested from the Agency? Please provide written documentation. 6. Is the Project considered infill in a populated area? Please explain. 7. Does the Project provide walkability? 8. Is there additional county infrastructure necessary to service the Project? If, yes, please explain. 9. Is the Project part of a larger mixed-use development? Please describe. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 15 Page132 Page133 Section IX: Agency Fee Schedule * Minimum Fee to be applied to all project receiving OCIDA benefits is 1% of the Total Project Cost (TPC) ACTIVITY FEES COMMENTS N Non- refundable Application Fee (All projects $1,000 Due at time of except Solar Projects) application Non-refundable Application Fee (Solar $10,000 Projects Only) L Legal Deposit (All projects except Solar $2,500 Due at time of Projects) application S Legal Deposit (Solar Projects Only) $5,000 Minimum Fee of 1% of TPC 1. Sales and Use Tax Exemption .01 X TPC Due at closing 2. Mortgage Recording Tax 3. PILOT is an additional fee .0025 X TPC (total .0125) Bonds Due at closing B Bond refinancing and refunding .0025 of TPC A Agency Legal Fees .0. Fe Fee for first $20 million .0025 X of the project cost or bond Due at closing amount Fe Fee for expenses above $20 million .. .0 .00125 X of project cost or bond amount . Amendment or Modification of IDA U Up to but not to exceed 5% of Agency Due at time of documents, including but not limited to name Fee as noted on the Cost Benefit Request or organization change, refinancing, etc. Analysis at time of project approval. Consent to the amendment or modification ofLe Attorney fees determined by OCIDA IDA documents prior to closing on the project Legal Representative. shall be given at OCIDA’s sole and absolute discretion. OCIDA reserves the right to modify this schedule at any time and assess fees and charges in connection with other transactions such as grants of easement or lease or sale of OCIDA-owned property. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 17 Page134 Page135 Page136 Section XII: Representations, Certifications, and Indemnification Frank Fava (Name of CEO or other authorized representative of Applicant) confirms and says that he/she is the ____________________ Member (title) of ____________________ PBFF Drakes LLC (name of corporation or other entity) named in the attached Application (the “Applicant”), that he/she has read the foregoing Application and knows the contents thereof, and hereby represents, understands, and otherwise agrees with the Agency and as follows: A. First Consideration for Employment: In accordance with §858-b (2) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any Financial Assistance from the Agency, except as otherwise provided by collective bargaining agreements, where practicable, the Applicant will first consider persons eligible to participate in WIA programs who shall be referred by the CNY Works for new employment opportunities created as a result of the Project. B. Other NYS Facilities: In accordance with §862 (1) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that projects which will result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant within the state is ineligible for Agency Financial Assistance, unless otherwise approved by the Agency as reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project in its respective industry or is reasonably necessary. C. Annual Sales Tax Filings: In accordance with §874(8) of the New York General Municipal Law, the Applicant understands and agrees that if the Project receives any sales tax exemptions as part of the Financial Assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file, or cause to be filed, with the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, the annual form prescribed by the Department of Taxation and Finance, describing the value of all sales tax exemptions claimed by the Applicant and all consultants or subcontractors retained by the Applicant. D. Outstanding Bonds: The Applicant understands and agrees to provide on an annual basis any information regarding bonds, if any, issued by the Agency for the project that is requested by the Comptroller of the State of New York. E. Employment Reports: The Applicant understands and agrees that, if the Project receives any financial assistance from the Agency, the Applicant agrees to file with the Agency, at least annually or as otherwise required by the Agency, reports regarding the number of people employed at the project site, salary levels, contractor utilization and such other information (collectively, “Employment Reports”) that may be required from time to time on such appropriate forms as designated by the Agency. Failure to provide Employment Reports within 30 days of an Agency request shall be an Event of Default under the PILOT Agreement between the Agency and Applicant and, if applicable, an Event of Default under the Agent Agreement between the Agency and Applicant. In addition, a Notice of Failure to provide the Agency with an Employment Report may be reported to Agency board members, with said report being an agenda item subject to the open meetings law. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 20 Page137 F. Prevailing Wage: The Applicant understands and agrees that, if the Project receives any financial assistance from the Agency, the Applicant shall determine whether the Project is a “covered project” pursuant to Section 224-a of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law and, if applicable, the Applicant shall comply with Section 224-a of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law; and the Applicant further covenants that the Applicant shall provide such evidence of the foregoing as requested by the Agency. G. Absence of Conflicts of Interest: The Applicant has received from the Agency a list of the members, officers and employees of the Agency. No member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described in Section X. H. Compliance: The Applicant understands and agrees that it is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection, and environmental laws, rules, and regulations. I. The Applicant understands and agrees that the provisions of Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law, as provided below, will not be violated if financial assistance is provided for the proposed Project: § 862. Restrictions on funds of the Agency. (1) No funds of the Agency shall be used in respect of any project if the completion thereof would result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the project occupant from one area of the state to another area of the state or in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the project occupant located within the state, provided, however, that neither restriction shall apply if the agency shall determine on the basis of the application before it that the project is reasonably necessary to discourage the project occupant from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the state or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the project occupant in its respective industry. J. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the owner, occupant or operator receiving financial assistance for the proposed Project is in substantial compliance with applicable local, state, and federal tax, worker protection and environmental laws, rules and regulations. K. The Applicant confirms and acknowledges that the submission of any knowingly false or knowingly misleading information may lead to the immediate termination of any financial assistance and the reimbursement of an amount equal to all or part of any tax exemption claimed by reason of the Agency’s involvement in the Project. L. The Applicant confirms and hereby acknowledges that as of the date of this Application, the Applicant is in substantial compliance with all provisions of Article 18-A of the New York General Municipal Law, including, but not limited to, the provision of Section 859- a and Section 862(1) of the New York General Municipal Law. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 21 Page138 M. The Applicant and the individual executing this Application on behalf of Applicant acknowledge that the Agency and its counsel will rely on the representations and covenants made in this Application when acting hereon and hereby represents that the statements made herein do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact and do not omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement contained herein not misleading. N. The OCIDA has the right to request and inspect supporting documentation regarding attestations made on this application. O. Hold Harmless Agreement: Applicant hereby releases Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency and the members, officers, servants, agents and employees thereof (the "Agency") from, agrees that the Agency shall not be liable for, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Agency harmless from and against any and all liability arising from or expense incurred by: (A) the Agency's examination and processing of, and action pursuant to or upon, the attached Application, regardless of whether or not the Application or the Project described therein or the tax-exemptions and other assistance requested therein are favorably acted upon by the Agency; (B) the Agency's acquisition, construction, and/or installation of the Project described therein and (C) any further action taken by the Agency with respect to the Project, including without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all cause of action and attorney's fees and any other expenses incurred in defending any suits or action which may arise as a result of any of the foregoing. If, for any reason, the Applicant fails to conclude or consummate necessary negotiations, or fails, within a reasonable or specified period of time, to take reasonable, proper or requested action, or withdraws, abandons, cancels or neglects the Application, or if the Agency or the Applicant are unable to reach final agreement with respect to the Project, then, and in the event, upon presentation of an invoice itemizing the same, the Applicant shall pay to the Agency, its agents or assigns, all costs incurred by the Agency in the process of the Application, including attorney's fees, if any. Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 22 Page139 Page140 Prior Financial Assistance Received by Project Beneficiary: The Project Company has common ownership with CP 850, LLC which was awarded financial assistance in the form of a partial real property tax abatement, sales and use tax abatement and an abatement from mortgage recording taxes in connection with a 26 unit housing complex located at approximately Center Pointe Drive, town of Lysander and encompassing tax parcel 313689079.-1-18.0. The project name was CP 850 and the transaction closed in 2015. Project Narrative and Description of the Project: PBFF Drakes LLC is a New York limited liability company wholly owned by Frank Fava and Pat Bassett, two long-time, reputable and experienced multi-family owners and developers in Central York. Together, Pat and Frank own and manage 147 residential units in New York State. Their customers are comprised of residential multifamily apartment complex tenants. Since execution and delivery of the Purchase and Sale Agreement with the YMCA for the Project Site, which is anticipated to close simultaneously with the IDA closing, construction costs, both in terms of raw materials and project labor, have risen dramatically. The return on investment prior to this sharp increase in costs was at a level where financial assistance was needed in order to move forward, and the increase in costs made it such that an even greater amount of financial assistance was needed in order to move forward without financial assistance. Finally, the significant and repeated interest rate hikes by the Federal government undertaken in an attempt to reverse the rapid increase in inflation has made it such that even with financial assistance, the return on investment is not enough to proceed, but the Applicant is willing to risk obtaining a lower return if financial assistance can be provided, but cannot proceed if it is not. The Applicant would like to transform this currently vacant approximate 22.1 acre parcel into a residential apartment complex consisting of six (6) apartment buildings, each three (3) stories totaling approximately 34,000 square feet and containing twenty-seven (27) apartments consisting of six (6) one-bedroom apartments, seventeen (17) two-bedroom apartments, four (4) three-bedroom apartments and sixty (60) garages within each apartment building. The Project will also include the construction of a clubhouse totaling approximately 3,000 square feet for use by the residents as well as sixty (60) garage units disconnected from the apartment buildings in twelve (12) buildings each containing five (5) garage units and a maintenance building totaling approximately 2,000 square feet. There will be a total of one-hundred twenty (120) garages. The Project is fulfilling an unmet need in the area as there is currently a housing shortage, which will only be made worse with the addition of Micron. The Town of Lysander has adopted a resolution supporting the Project and the delivery of financial assistance by the Agency, including a PILOT Agreement. The Radisson Community has also provided a letter expressing its support for the Project. The Project is considered in-fill of a populated area because it is part of the Radisson Planned Unit District and would complete a portion of that PUD. The Project provides walkability to other areas in the Town, including those amenities afforded to the public in the Radisson Community and will include sidewalks. There is not additional infrastructure needed from Onondaga County to complete the Project and as indicated earlier, it is part of the Radisson PUD. Page141 Drakes Landing Apartment Layout Apartment # Floor BEDROOMS Sq. Ft. 101 1 1 804 Handicap 102 1 2 1316 103 1 3 1407 104 1 3 1433 105 1 3 1426 106 1 3 1316 107 1 1 804 Handicap 201 2 2 1080 202 2 2 1182 203 2 2 1228 204 2 1 1017 3 season (55 sq ft 205 2 2 1272 206 2 2 1275 207 2 1 1017 3 season (55 sq ft) 208 2 2 1228 209 2 2 1182 210 2 2 1080 301 3 2 1080 302 3 2 1031 3 season (68 sq ft) 303 3 2 1250 304 3 2 1309 305 3 1 922 3 season (51 sq ft) 306 3 1 922 3 season (51 sq ft) 307 3 2 1309 308 3 2 1250 309 3 2 1031 3 season (68 sq ft) 310 3 2 1080 31,251 sq. ft. Page142 Q:\CADD Files\PROJECTS\B&F Development - 1059\008 - Drakes Landing\Working Drawings\aerial.dwg, 2/9/2023 10:15:28 AM Page143 Q:\CADD Files\PROJECTS\B&F Development - 1059\008 - Drakes Landing\Working Drawings\BASE.dwg, 5/11/2022 2:19:11 PM Page144 5800 HERITAGE LANDING DRIVE T: (315)449-4940 F: (315)449-4941 EAST SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13057 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A. Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Drake's Landing Apartments Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): Intersection of Route 31 and Drake's Landing Road (see Project Plans) Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): Development of an apartment complex, consisting of 6, 3-story, multi-family buildings, 6 garages, and 2 support buildings (a clubhouse and maintenance building), on a 22.1-acre lot (see Application, Drawings, and Reports transmitted to the Town on January 10, 2022). Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: (315) 575-1664 B & F Development E-Mail: ffava@twcny.rr.com Address: 8927 Center Pointe Drive City/PO: State: Zip Code: Baldwinsville New York 13027 Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: (315) 474-6851 E-Mail: YMCA of Greater Syracuse, Inc. Address: 340 Montgomery Street City/PO: State: Zip Code: Syracuse New York 13202 Page 1 of 13 FEAF 2019 Page145 B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Counsel, Town Board, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village 9 Yes 9 No ✔ Town of Lysander Planning Board - Planning Board or Commission Site Plan c. City, Town or 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies 9 Yes 9 No ✔ Town of Lysander Highway Dept. - curb cut e. County agencies 9 Yes 9 No ✔ Onondaga County GML 239 Referal f. Regional agencies 9 Yes ✔ 9 No g. State agencies ✔ 9 Yes 9 No NYSDEC - Stormwater Discharge Permit h. Federal agencies 9 Yes 9 No ✔ Army Corp of Engineers i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the 9 Yes ✔ 9 No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. • If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site ✔ 9 Yes 9 No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action 9 Yes ✔ 9 No would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 13 Page146 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. 9 ✔ Yes 9 No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? PUD _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Highway Overlay District _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? 9 ✔ Yes 9 No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? Baldwinsville Central School District ________________________________________________________________ b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Onondaga County Sheriff and New York State Police _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Belgium Cold Springs Fire Department __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. What parks serve the project site? Drake's Landing Park, Kerri Hornaday Park, and Town of Lysander Park __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? Residential _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 22.10 acres _____________ b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 10.8 _____________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 22.10 acres _____________ c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? 9 Yes ✔9 No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No iii. Number of lots proposed? ________ iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? 9 Yes ✔9 No i. If No, anticipated period of construction: 18 months _____ ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated _____ • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year • Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 13 Page147 f. Does the project include new residential uses? ✔ 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ 162 units in 6 buildings At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ 162 units in 6 buildings g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ If Yes, 14 i. Total number of structures ___________ (12 detached garages; 1 maintenance building; 1 clubhouse) 30 ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; 58 ________width; 50 and _______ length (clubhouse & maintenance building) 4,458 iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any 9 Yes 9 No ✔ liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, Required stormwater detention. i. Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: 9 Ground water 9 Surface water streams ✔ 9 Other specify: stormwater _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. 0.8 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. 1.01 Volume: ____________ 0.8 million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: see below height; see below length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ___________________________________________________ Earth, stormwater detention basins, Item v. based upon height of berm. Berm A = 5.5 feet in height and 440 L.F. Berm B = 3.5 feet in height and 220 L.F. D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ • Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? 9 Yes ✔9 No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment 9 Yes ✔9 No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 Page148 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes ✔9 No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: ___________________________________________________________ • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:________________________________________ • purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? ✔9 Yes 9 No If Yes: 39,000 i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: ___________________ gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ✔9 Yes 9 No If Yes: Radisson Water Supply District • Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________ • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ✔9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district? ✔9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ✔9 Yes 9 No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ✔9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: _Approximately 1,660 feet of ductile iron water line originating at main east side of Drakes Landing, including approximately 5 hydrants.___________________________ • Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ OCWA/Lake Ontario iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If, Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ • Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ • Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ✔9 Yes 9 No If Yes: 39,000 gallons/day i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: ___________ ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and Sanitary Wastewater approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ✔9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Baldwinsville-Seneca Knolls Wastewater Treatment Plant Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ • Radisson Sewer District Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ✔9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district? ✔9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Page 5 of 13 Page149 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ • Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? 9 Yes ✔9 No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ 8-inch sanitary sewer line extending +/- 140 l.f. from existing manhole east side of Drakes Landing, all on-site sewer lines will be privately maintained. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes ✔9 No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ • Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ • Seneca River What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point 9 Yes 9 No ✔ sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? 6.7 acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ 22.1 acres (parcel size) _____ Square feet or _____ Stormwater Facilities (2 total) ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? On-site Stormwater Management Facility/Structures ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ • If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? 9 Yes ✔9 No iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel 9 Yes 9 No ✔ combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) Construction Equipment _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) HVAC Equipment ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet 9 Yes ✔ 9 No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 6 of 13 Page150 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, 9 Yes ✔9 No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as 9 Yes ✔ 9 No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial 9 Yes 9 No ✔ new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): † ✔ Morning † Evening ✔ †Weekend † Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): _____________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Parking spaces: Existing ___________________ Proposed ___________ 345 345 Net increase/decrease _____________________ iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? Yes ✔ No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Two access drives. vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing 9 Yes 9 No ✔ pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand 9 Yes 9 No ✔ for energy? If Yes: 1,773,900 per USPOE estimate) i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ National Grid iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: 7:00 AM-7:00 PM • Monday - Friday: _________________________ • N/A Monday - Friday: ____________________________ 7:00 AM-5:00 PM • Saturday: ________________________________ • Saturday: ___________________________________ • Sunday: _________________________________ • Sunday: ____________________________________ • Holidays: ________________________________ • Holidays: ___________________________________ Page 7 of 13 Page151 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ✔ 9 Yes 9 No operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: Construction equipment as typical for residential construction activity (see D.1.i on Page 7 of 13). _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: Lighting will be building-mounted, be dark sky compliant, and be directed at the adjacent parking areas and _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ drives. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ✔ 9 Yes 9 No The Site Plan will preserve as much as possible of the existing natural barriers. Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year) iii. Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities:________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal 9 Yes 9 No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: ____________________ year (unit of time) (.25 pounts per s.f. per NAHB) 14 tons per ________________ • Operation : ____________________ 3,767 tons per ________________ year (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ Carry-in/Carry-out site ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ OCRA Reuse/Recycle Program in place ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: Contractor to remove a legally dispose of all construction waste. • Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Local hauling (trash) service. • Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 13 Page152 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • ________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or • ________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous 9 Yes ✔ 9 No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. 9 Urban 9 Industrial 9 Commercial ✔ 9 Residential (suburban) 9 Rural (non-farm) 9 Forest 9 Agriculture 9 Aquatic ✔ wetland 9 Other (specify): ____________________________________ ✔ ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres +/-) • Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces --- 6.8 +6.8 • Forested 16.3 6.6 -9.3 • Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) N/A • Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) N/A • Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) --- 0.8 + 0.8 • Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) 4.8 4.7 - 0.1 • Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) --- N/A --- • Other Describe: _______________________________ N/A ________________________________________ Page 9 of 13 Page153 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? 9 Yes ✔o No i. If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed 9 Yes ✔ 9 No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: _________________________________ feet • Dam length: _________________________________ feet • Surface area: _________________________________ acres • Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? 9 Yes 9 No • If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin 9 Yes ✔ 9 No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any 9 Yes ✔ 9 No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Remediation database? Check all that apply: 9 Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10 of 13 Page154 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No • If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ • Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ • Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ • Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? 9 Yes 9 No • Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? 2.5 ________________ feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: Lockport and Brockport ___________________________ 67.5 % Lairdsville Silt Loam ___________________________ 11.3 % Ontario Gravelly Loam ____________________________ 12.1 % 1 d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ feet 9 Well Drained: e. Drainage status of project site soils: ✔ 23 of site _____% 9 Moderately Well Drained: ✔ 9 of site _____% 9 Poorly Drained ✔ 68 of site _____% f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 9 0-10%: 85 of site _____% 9 10-15%: 5 of site _____% 9 15% or greater: 10 of site _____% g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, 9 Yes 9 No ✔ ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ✔ 9 Yes 9 No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: • Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ • Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ • Wetlands: Army Corps of Engineers Name ____________________________________________ 4.94 Acres Approximate Size ___________________ • Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired ✔ No 9 Yes 9 waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No j. Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No k. Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? ✔ 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: Principal Aquifer, Primary Aquifer i. Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 13 Page155 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: ______________________ acres • Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres • Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ✔9 Yes 9 No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? If Yes: Indiana Bat i. Species and listing (endangered or threatened):______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of 9 Yes ✔ 9 No special concern? If Yes: i. Species and listing:____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: 9 Biological Community 9 Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 13 Page156 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district 9 Yes ✔ 9 No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: 9 Archaeological Site 9 Historic Building or District ii. Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for 9 Yes 9 No ✔ archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h. Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local 9 Yes 9 No ✔ scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: Kerri Hornaday Park i. Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, Local Park etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 0.3 iii. Distance between project and resource: _____________________ miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? 9 Yes 9 No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Date_______________________________________ Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________ PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 Page157 B&F Development - Drakes Landing Apartments (SEE ATTACHED SUPPLEMENT) Agency Use Only [If applicable] Full Environmental Assessment Form Project : Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date : Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency=s reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer “Yes” to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer “No” to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box “Moderate to large impact may occur.” • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the Awhole action@. • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, † NO † YES ✔ the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 2. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d 9 ✔ 9 less than 3 feet. b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f 9 ✔ 9 c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or E2a 9 ✔ 9 generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a 9 ✔ 9 of natural material. e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year D1e 9 ✔ 9 or in multiple phases. f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical D2e, D2q 9 ✔ 9 disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B1i 9 ✔ 9 h. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ 9 ✔ 9 ___________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 10 FEAF 2019 Page158 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, † NO ✔ † YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, move on to Section 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: ________________________________ E2g 9 9 ___________________________________________________________________ b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c 9 9 registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: _____________________________________________________ c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 ___________________________________________________________________ 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water † NO ✔ † YES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) If “Yes”, answer questions a - l. If “No”, move on to Section 4. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, D1h 9 ✔ 9 b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a D2b 9 ✔ 9 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a 9 ✔ 9 from a wetland or water body. d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h 9 ✔ 9 tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, D2a, D2h 9 ✔ 9 runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal D2c 9 ✔ 9 of water from surface water. g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge D2d 9 ✔ 9 of wastewater to surface water(s). h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e 9 ✔ 9 stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h 9 ✔ 9 downstream of the site of the proposed action. j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q, E2h 9 ✔ 9 around any water body. k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, D1a, D2d 9 ✔ 9 wastewater treatment facilities. Page 2 of 10 Page159 l. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ 9 9 ___________________________________________________________________ 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or ✔ † NO † YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 5. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand D2c 9 9 on supplies from existing water supply wells. b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c 9 9 withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: ________________________________________________________ c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and D1a, D2c 9 9 sewer services. d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E2l 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c, E1f, 9 9 where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. E1g, E1h f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products D2p, E2l 9 9 over ground water or an aquifer. g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 E2h, D2q, 9 9 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2l, D2c h. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________ 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. † NO ✔ † YES (See Part 1. E.2) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, move on to Section 6. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j 9 9 c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k 9 9 d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage D2b, D2e 9 9 patterns. e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, 9 9 E2j, E2k f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, E1e 9 9 or upgrade? Page 3 of 10 Page160 g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 ___________________________________________________________________ 6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. † ✔ NO † YES (See Part 1. D.2.f., D.2.h, D.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, move on to Section 7. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) D2g 9 9 ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N2O) D2g 9 9 iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) D2g 9 9 iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) D2g 9 9 D2g 9 9 v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of hydrochloroflourocarbons (HFCs) emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2h 9 9 b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g 9 9 hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions D2f, D2g 9 9 rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU=s per hour. d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in “a” through “c”, D2g 9 9 above. e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s 9 9 ton of refuse per hour. f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________ 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.) † NO † YES ✔ If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 8. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E2o 9 ✔ 9 threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2o 9 ✔ 9 any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government. c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p 9 ✔ 9 species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p 9 ✔ 9 any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government. Page 4 of 10 Page161 e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural E3c 9 ✔ 9 Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any E2n 9 ✔ 9 portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: ____________________________________________________________ g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or E2m 9 ✔ 9 over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, 9 ✔ 9 E1b grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: ______________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of D2q 9 ✔ 9 herbicides or pesticides. j. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 ✔ 9 __________________________________________________________________ 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) ✔ † NO † YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 9. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c, E3b 9 9 NYS Land Classification System. b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land E1a, Elb 9 9 (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b 9 9 active agricultural land. d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural E1b, E3a 9 9 uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a, E1b 9 9 management system. f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development C2c, C3, 9 9 potential or pressure on farmland. D2c, D2d g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c 9 9 Protection Plan. h. Other impacts: ________________________________________________________ 9 9 Page 5 of 10 Page162 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in † NO ✔ † YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.1.b, E.3.h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 10. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local E3h 9 ✔ 9 scenic or aesthetic resource. b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant E3h, C2b 9 ✔ 9 screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) 9 ✔ 9 ii. Year round 9 9 d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h action is: E2q, i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work 9 ✔ 9 ii. Recreational or tourism based activities E1c 9 ✔ 9 e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h 9 ✔ 9 appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed D1a, E1a, 9 ✔ 9 project: D1f, D1g 0-1/2 mile ½ -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________ 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological † NO ✔ † YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 11. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on the National or E3e 9 9 State Register of Historical Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f 9 9 to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g 9 9 to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: ____________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 10 Page163 d. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________ If any of the above (a-d) are answered “Moderate to large impact may e. occur”, continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3: i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e, E3g, 9 9 of the site or property. E3f ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property’s setting or E3e, E3f, 9 9 integrity. E3g, E1a, E1b iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e, E3f, 9 9 are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3g, E3h, C2, C3 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a † NO ✔ † YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.1.c., E.2.q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 12. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or “ecosystem D2e, E1b 9 9 services”, provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater E2h, storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, E2o, E2n, E2p b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, E1c, 9 9 C2c, E2q c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c 9 9 with few such resources. E1c, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c, E1c 9 9 community as an open space resource. e. Other impacts: _____________________________________________________ 9 9 _________________________________________________________________ 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical † NO ✔ † YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, go to Section 13. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or E3d 9 9 characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d 9 9 characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________ Page 7 of 10 Page164 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. † NO † YES ✔ (See Part 1. D.2.j) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 14. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j ✔9 9 b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j 9 ✔ 9 more vehicles. c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j 9 ✔ 9 d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j 9 ✔ 9 e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j 9 ✔ 9 f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 ✔ 9 __________________________________________________________________ 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. † NO ✔ † YES (See Part 1. D.2.k) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 15. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k 9 9 b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission D1f, 9 9 or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a D1q, D2k commercial or industrial use. c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k 9 9 d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square D1g 9 9 feet of building area when completed. e. Other Impacts: ________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. † NO ✔ † YES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 16. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m ✔9 9 regulation. b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, E1d 9 ✔ 9 hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o 9 ✔ 9 Page 8 of 10 Page165 d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n 9 ✔ 9 e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing D2n, E1a 9 ✔ 9 area conditions. f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________ 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure ✔ † NO † YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - m. If “No”, go to Section 17. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may cccur occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day E1d 9 9 care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community. b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. E1g, E1h 9 9 c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site E1g, E1h 9 9 remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the E1g, E1h 9 9 property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place E1g, E1h 9 9 to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t 9 9 generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, E1f 9 9 management facility. h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, E1f 9 9 i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of D2r, D2s 9 9 solid waste. j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of E1f, E1g 9 9 a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. E1h k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill E1f, E1g 9 9 site to adjacent off site structures. l. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the D2s, E1f, 9 9 project site. D2r m. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Page 9 of 10 Page166 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. † NO ✔ † YES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, go to Section 18. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action’s land use components may be different from, or in sharp C2, C3, D1a 9 9 contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). E1a, E1b b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village C2 9 9 in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 9 9 d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use C2, C2 9 9 plans. e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3, D1c, 9 9 supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. D1d, D1f, D1d, Elb f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4, D2c, D2d 9 9 that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or C2a 9 9 commercial development not included in the proposed action) h. Other: _____________________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________ 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. † NO ✔ † YES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas E3e, E3f, E3g 9 9 of historic importance to the community. b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 9 9 schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2, C3, D1f 9 9 there is a shortage of such housing. D1g, E1a d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 9 9 or designated public resources. e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2, C3 9 9 character. f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 9 9 E1a, E1b E2g, E2h g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________ PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10 Page167 B&F Development Drakes Landing Apartments Supplement to Part 2 – Environmental Assessment Form 1. Impact on Land: 1.a. The Soils Report indicates that the soil types represent conditions where groundwater is less than 3.0 feet. However, soil borings were undertaken on October 26, 2020. Based on the Soils Report prepared by Stopen Engineering, groundwater on the site was not observed in test pits ranging from 6.0 feet to 9.0 feet, within the proposed area of disturbance (and outside of the wetland areas to remain undisturbed). As programmed, the area of disturbance subject to excavation includes approximately 10.8 acres of the site. Excavation will provide for site grading to accommodate buildings, driveways, parking areas, installation of underground site utilities, and stormwater management facilities. The proposed buildings will not have basements or sub-grade apartments. 1.b. NO IMPACT 1.c. NO IMPACT 1.d. Soils to be excavated for buildings and underground utilities will be utilized on-site for rough grading of the apartment complex, and construction of stormwater management facilities. Soils will also be utilized on-site to achieve the final grade of the site, and developing berm areas and landscaped areas, and to accommodate drainage and dry-swales as part of the stormwater management facilities. 1.e. Project construction is expected to take 18 months. Noise will be limited to daytime hours as indicated in Section D.2.l.i. of Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form. 1.f. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is incorporated into the project design. No vegetation will be treated with herbicides. All vegetation within the area of disturbance will be removed by mechanical clearing and grubbing. 1.g. NO IMPACT 1.h. NO IMPACT 2. Impact on Geological Features: NO IMPACT 3. Impact on Surface Water: 3.a. NO IMPACT 3.b. NO IMPACT 3.c. NO IMPACT Dunn & Sgromo Engineers, PLLC 1 February 8, 2022 Page168 B&F Development Drakes Landing Apartments 3.d. The parcel contains 22.10 acres of woodland. Of the 22.10 acres, 47% of the site will remain as open space. Wetlands (4.8 acres) will remain undisturbed, thus maintaining the higher quality habitat area of the site. As a result, almost one-half of the site will remain as open space. A small area, 5,355 square feet in size contains a “non-jurisdictional wetland”. 3.e. An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is included, and a SWPPP was submitted to the Town of Lysander dated November 2021. 3.f. NO IMPACT 3.g. NO IMPACT 3.h. An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is included, and a SWPPP was submitted to the Town of Lysander dated November 2021. 3.i. NO IMPACT 3.j. NO IMPACT 3.k. NO IMPACT 4. Impact on Groundwater: NO IMPACT 5. Impact on Flooding: NO IMPACT 6. Impact on Air: NO IMPACT 7. Impact on Plants and Animals: 7.a. NO IMPACT 7.b. The parcel contains 22.10 acres of woodland. Of the 22.10 acres, 47% of the site will remain as open space. Wetlands (4.8 acres) will remain undisturbed, thus maintaining the higher quality habitat area of the site. As a result, almost one-half of the site will remain as open space. There has been no objective evidence that the project will result in a negative impact to the wildlife in the area. Measures will be taken to ensure that there is no danger to the local bat population. Although no evidence of the Indiana or Long-eared Bat has been uncovered, measures will be taken to acquire a Letter of Concurrence from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or to comply with NYSDEC regulations regarding protection of the species. 7.c. Measures will be taken to ensure that there is no danger to the local bat population. Although no evidence of the Indiana or Long-eared Bat has been uncovered, measures will be taken to acquire a Letter of Concurrence from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or to comply with NYSDEC regulations regarding protection of the species. Dunn & Sgromo Engineers, PLLC 2 February 8, 2022 Page169 B&F Development Drakes Landing Apartments 7.d. Measures will be taken to ensure that there is no danger to the local bat population. Although no evidence of the Indiana or Long-eared Bat has been uncovered, measures will be taken to acquire a Letter of Concurrence from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or to comply with NYSDEC regulations regarding protection of the species. 7.e NO IMPACT 7.f. NO IMPACT 7.g. NO IMPACT 7.h. Site disturbance will be approximately 10.8 acres per the Project Plans. The site is dominated mainly by secondary growth, including mostly small to moderate sized trees with shrub/scrub underbrush. The area of disturbance does not contain high quality woodland habitat. 7.i. NO IMPACT 7.j. NO IMPACT 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources: NO IMPACT 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources: 9.a. NO IMPACT 9.b. NO IMPACT 9.c. The project will be screened with both existing native vegetation, and newly planted evergreen trees designed to screen views into the site throughout the year. Care will be taken to maintain as many existing trees as practical. Vegetation between the north, west, and south boundary will be substantially maintained to separate the project from adjoining neighborhoods. On the portion of the site near the NYS Route 31 and Drakes Landing intersection, as well as along the east boundary, existing trees will be maintained, and supplemented with new evergreen trees. 9.d. The project may be viewed via routine travel by residents travelling to and from Drakes Landing. However, the project will be screened with vegetation, and will be above the normal line of sight, assuming an average minimum tree height of 25 feet, and a driver’s eye height of 4 to 6 feet above pavement elevation on public roads surrounding the project. 9.e. NO IMPACT 9.f. Similar projects exist within proximity to the proposed Drakes Landing Apartments site. Projects within and near the Radisson PUD include: Centerpointe - 3 stories (the same structure was previously constructed): Approximately 1 mile Dunn & Sgromo Engineers, PLLC 3 February 8, 2022 Page170 B&F Development Drakes Landing Apartments Silverwood Senior Apartments - 3 stories Approximately 1/2 mile Riverknoll Apartments - 2 stories Less than 1/10 mile Timber Banks Apartments - 3 stories Approximately 1/2 mile 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources: NO IMPACT An Archeological Study was performed and found no evidence of archeological significance. A letter from Tim Lloyd, PhD of the New York State Department of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation was received on August 27, 2021 stating that the agency has “no concerns regarding the projects potential impact to historic archeological resources.” 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation: NO IMPACT 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas: NO IMPACT 13. Impact on Transportation: The project location is appropriate and consistent with the highway function of a major collector road. The Traffic Impact Study (Dunn & Sgromo Engineers – 2020, revised January 2022) indicates that…. All of the studied intersections and approaches under proposed conditions will operate at the same or very close to the level-of-service of the existing conditions. As such, the existing road system will adequately address the project’s introduction into the area. On August 28, 2020, after a review of the issues relating to traffic in the area, and the Traffic Impact Study listed above, a letter was received from Region 3 offices of the New York State Department of Transportation. The letter was authorized by Elizabeth Parmley, P.E., and concluded, “The proposed development will not have a significant negative impact to the adjacent traffic signal. I recommend approval of the TIS.” 14. Impact on Energy: NO IMPACT 15. Impact on Noise, Odor and Light: 15.a. During construction, there may be temporary periods of typical construction noise. However, noise levels would not exceed levels expected by single-family home construction (i.e. a subdivision), and would be occurring only during daytime hours. Once completed, the project will not create ambient noise greater than that of a single-family subdivision, and will not exceed local noise regulations. 15.b. NO IMPACT Dunn & Sgromo Engineers, PLLC 4 February 8, 2022 Page171 B&F Development Drakes Landing Apartments 15.c. NO IMPACT 15.d. NO IMPACT 15.e. Development on the 10.8-acre area of disturbance will obviously alter the site, but will not create impacts greater than that of the surrounding residential land use. Approximately 47% of the site will remain in open space, thus, securing the integrity of almost half of the site in wooded open space that will be protected with a Conservation Easement. Any visual elements out of character with the pre- development appearance of the site will be screened with natural native vegetation, evergreen trees, and landscaping. Lighting levels at the property line will be maintained to a level of 0 foot candles. 16. Impact on Human Health: NO IMPACT 17. Consistency with Community Plans: NO IMPACT The proposed development is consistent with the current General Project Plan for Radisson, which indicates that residential land use is an allowed use of the parcel. 18. Consistency with Community Character: NO IMPACT The proposed buildings have been designed to incorporate high quality architectural design elements, and the site will be screened with landscaping and trees. The majority of the parking will be in the central quad, and will not be visible from Drakes Landing. In addition, 47% of the site will remain as open space. Existing vegetation between the project and Sabine Road will remain as a buffer to those residents. The Radisson PUD was formed to provide a mix of housing opportunities to current and future residents, and this project will be consistent with those standards. Dunn & Sgromo Engineers, PLLC 5 February 8, 2022 Page172 Page173 Page174 Page175 Page176 Page177 Page178 Page179