Clay Zoning Board Writes a Ruling for a Mirabito Gas Station, Then Votes It Down 2-1
The Town of Clay Zoning Board of Appeals spent its Aug. 11, 2025 meeting laying out detailed findings that a gasoline service station is an allowed use inside a proposed Route 31 shopping center, then failed to adopt that interpretation on a 2-1 roll call; the board separately approved five unrelated area variances, including a pool, a garage, a credit union sign, and 70-foot screening trees at a storage facility.
Street intersection in the village of Liverpool — photo:
Giorgio Galeotti
(BY 3.0)
▶Key Actions & Decisions
●• Case #1979 (Russ Mitchell, Planning Board Chairman, re: Mirabito Energy): motion to interpret the Town Code as allowing a gasoline service station within a Highway Commercial shopping center — Frantzis in favor, Porter in favor, Mason opposed. Motion Failed
●• The board declined to rule on Mirabito's objection that the appeal itself was untimely, calling that a question for a court
●• Case #1981 (Kirby Dar Dar, 7917 Morgan Road): rear yard setback reduced from 10 feet to 6 feet for an inground pool, approved 4-0
●• Case #1982 (Joseph Grispino, 706 Shaver Avenue): side yard setback reduced from 8.5 feet to 3 feet for a 20x30 garage, and rear yard setback reduced from 10 feet to 3 feet to relocate a 12x26 shed, approved 4-0
●• Case #1983 (Pack Rat Storage/Chad Parks): height variance allowing screening trees up to 70 feet where code caps structures at 2.5 feet, approved 4-0; resident Janet Rathburn spoke in favor
●• Case #1984 (Northern Credit Union, Kimbrook Square): setback reduced from 165 feet to 128.6 feet and a second freestanding sign approved (one allowed by code), approved 4-0
●• Case #1985 (Carl Hibbard Jr.): front yard setback reduced from 55 feet to 3.5 feet and side yard setback reduced from 18 feet to 5 feet for a detached garage, approved 4-0; neighbor Lisa Campagna's emailed concerns were resolved on site
●• Board classified all new actions as Type II under SEQRA and approved the July 14, 2025 minutes
●• Meeting opened at 6:00 p.m. and adjourned at 6:52 p.m.
The Town of Clay Zoning Board of Appeals did something unusual on Aug. 11, 2025: it wrote out a full legal ruling in its own minutes, and then voted against adopting it.
The case, held over from a July 14 hearing, asked a narrow question with real consequences for a stretch of Route 31. The Town of Clay Planning Board, through its chairman, Russ Mitchell, wanted the Zoning Board to interpret whether a gasoline service station is an allowed use in the Highway Commercial (HC-1) district when it is part of a shopping center — the arrangement Mirabito Energy was proposing. The board's own motion, made by member Ryan Frantzis, walked through the code section by section: the definition of a shopping center lists gasoline service stations among the uses commonly included, and applying the standard rule that ambiguity in a zoning code is read against the drafter, the motion concluded a gas station is an allowed use in a shopping center in that district. The motion even added that if the Town Board wants to remove that ambiguity, it should amend the code.
That conclusion never took effect. On the roll call, Frantzis and member David Porter voted in favor. Chairperson Vivian Mason voted opposed. The minutes record no vote from member Karen Liebi on this item. With only two of three recorded votes in favor, the motion failed — meaning the interpretation favoring Mirabito and the gas station use was not adopted, despite the reasoning written into the record supporting it. The board also declined to weigh in on a separate objection Mirabito had raised, that the underlying appeal was filed too late under the applicable statute of limitations, saying that question belongs in court rather than before the board. Attorney Robert Germain sat with the board for the case; no ruling resolves, for now, whether the Route 31 shopping center can include a gas station.
The rest of the night's business was more conventional: five area variance applications, all approved unanimously on 4-0 votes with Deputy Chairperson Liebi joining Mason, Frantzis and Porter.
Kirby Dar Dar, of 7917 Morgan Road, got a reduced rear yard setback, from 10 feet to 6 feet, to install an inground pool, telling the board the saltwater pool was for his family and that the surrounding land is farmland. Joseph Grispino, of 706 Shaver Avenue, received two variances at once: an 8.5-foot side yard setback cut to 3 feet for a 20-by-30 attached garage, and a rear yard setback cut from 10 feet to 3 feet to relocate an existing 12-by-26 shed.
Pack Rat Storage, represented by Pat Reynolds of Ianuzzi & Romans, needed a variance simply to plant trees. The Town of Clay's code caps front-yard tree height at 2.5 feet, and the storage facility's screening plan called for Red Maple and White Spruce that will eventually reach up to 70 feet — by Reynolds' own account, 35 times the allowable height. The Planning Board had asked for the replanting after the original trees along Henry Clay Boulevard were removed. Freestone Road resident Janet Rathburn told the board she supported the request, saying the new trees would help cut down on noise.
Northern Credit Union secured two variances for a planned branch with drive-in service in the currently vacant portion of Kimbrook Square: a building setback reduced from 165 feet to 128.6 feet, and a second freestanding sign where code allows only one. Attorney Brody Smith, representing the credit union, told the board the closer setback was meant to keep the new building's canopy in line with three neighboring buildings to the east. Member Liebi asked why the applicant hadn't simply taken over the building the site's former Walgreens had occupied; Smith said the credit union wanted a new building suited to its own brand.
Carl Hibbard Jr. closed out the case list with variances for a detached 20-by-22 garage, cutting the front yard setback from 55 feet to 3.5 feet and the side yard setback from 18 feet to 5 feet, citing a culvert and a leech field that limited his options. Gaskin Road resident Lisa Campagna, who had emailed the board with questions, said after Hibbard showed her the proposed location in person that she had no concerns.
Chairperson Mason adjourned the meeting at 6:52 p.m. What happens next on the Mirabito interpretation is unresolved: the board's written findings favor allowing the gas station, the vote did not, and whether the Town Board takes up the invitation to rewrite the shopping-center definition is, for now, an open question.
This article was drafted by AI (claude-sonnet-agent) from the official meeting transcript and reviewed by a human editor.
Quotes link to source video timestamps for verification.
Read our editorial policy.
Community Discussion
0 comments
Be the first to comment on this story.
🔍Ask Clay
Have a question about this story? Search across meeting transcripts, town history, and municipal code.
Related Zoning Board of Appeals Meetings
Apartment Firearm Transfer Request Delayed; Shed Replacement Approved
●Tabled application for a home-based firearms transfer business at 4764 Norstar Blvd. until the Oct. 13 meeting (5-0 vote).
●Approved area variances for a resident at 5085 Audrey Drive to replace a shed with setbacks reduced from 25.4 ft to 22 ft and 6 ft, and to legalize a 6-ft fence (5-0 vote).
Clay Zoning Board Hears Contested Mirabito Gas Station Question, Closes Hearing Without a Ruling
●• Minutes of the June 9, 2025 meeting accepted unanimously
●• Routine SEQR motion: all new actions classified Type II with a negative declaration, unanimously carried
●• Case #1975 (Rotem Evron/Pinecrest Apartments, 7300 Cedar Post Road): area variance to reduce required land area and add four dwelling units — approved unanimously, 3-0
●• Case #1977 (Marc Lebiedzinski, 7985 Morgan Road): area variances reducing lot area and lot width to allow a two-lot subdivision — approved unanimously, 3-0, conditioned on compliance with Exhibit "A"
●• Case #1979 (Planning Board Chairman Russ Mitchell, on behalf of the Planning Board): requested interpretation of whether gasoline service stations/pumps are an allowed use within a "shopping center" in the HC-1 Highway Commercial zone, in connection with a Mirabito project; Mirabito's attorney argued the request was untimely under the 60-day statute of limitations and that gas pumps are permitted as of right; no vote was recorded — Chairperson Mason closed the hearing
●• Case #1980 (Nicholas R. Grevelding, III, 9141 Riverside Road): motion to approve a front-yard setback reduction (75 to 40 feet) and deny a side-yard setback reduction (25 to 10 feet) failed 2-1 on roll call (Mr. Porter and Chairperson Mason in favor, Mr. Frantzis opposed); a second motion to approve both setback reductions as requested was not seconded and also failed — no variance was granted
●• Meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
Zoning Board Unanimously Approves Three Home Improvement Variances
●• Case #1971 (Alexa Dickson, 7783 Tirrell Hill Circle): area variance to keep chickens as pets on a 0.30-acre lot, denied 3-0 (Porter, Frantzis, Mason in favor of denial); board found the request substantial and cited potential odor and noise in a "thickly settled" residential area
●• Case #1973 (Jennifer M. Dunbar, 7392 Henry Clay Blvd.): front yard setback cut from 75 to 65 feet and both side yard setbacks cut from 25 to 15 feet for a house and garage addition, approved unanimously; Code Enforcement Commissioner Grispino noted the addition is intended as an in-law suite
●• Case #1974 (Deborah A. Magaro-Dolan, 207 Riverdale Road): side yard setback cut from 7.5 to 3 feet and rear yard setback cut from 10 to 3 feet to replace an 8-by-10 shed with a 10-by-16 shed in the same spot, approved unanimously
●• Case #1976 (Robert Seniecle, 8867 Canter Drive): front yard setback cut from 25 to 7.5 feet for a new 16-by-26 attached garage, approved unanimously
●• Case #1978 (Neil Warner, 11 Mallard Path): rear yard setback cut from 10 to 3 feet for a new 10-by-14 storage shed, approved unanimously; two audience members raised their hands in favor during the hearing, the only public comment recorded at the meeting
●• Board accepted the April 14 and May 12 minutes as submitted
●• Board classified all new actions as Type II under SEQRA, exempting them from further environmental review
●• Meeting opened at 6:00 p.m. and adjourned at 6:20 p.m.; member Karen Liebi and attorney Robert Germain were absent, with Neil Germain appearing as attorney
Northside Baptist Church Expansion Clears Zoning Hurdle
●• Case #1971 (Alexa Dickson, 7783 Tirrell Hill Circle): sought an area variance to keep chickens as pets on a 0.30-acre lot, well under the 5 acres the code requires for farm animals; eight residents spoke, five in favor and three opposed, and written comments were also mixed; Chairperson Mason closed the hearing but deferred a decision to a future meeting — no vote taken.
●• Case #1972 (Andrew Selesky, 4014 Maider Road): sought an area variance to raise the maximum height of a detached accessory structure from 25 to 27 feet to build a barn; no one spoke for or against it; approved unanimously (Porter, Frantzis, Mason all in favor) on a motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Frantzis, conditioned on substantial compliance with Exhibit "A."
●• Case #1967 (Northern Credit Union, 5004-5008 Taft Road): the applicant withdrew the application; no vote taken.
●• The board voted unanimously, on a motion by Chairperson Mason seconded by Mr. Frantzis, to classify all of the night's new actions as Type II under the New York State Environmental Quality Review process (SEQR) and issue negative declarations unless the board's attorney advised otherwise.
●• Approval of the April 14 minutes was postponed to the board's June 9 meeting because of pending corrections.
●• Members Karen Liebi and Chelsea Clark were absent; the meeting, called to order at 6:00 p.m., adjourned at 6:49 p.m.
Community Discussion
0 commentsBe the first to comment on this story.