Typeset from the PDF of the official document (read by OCR) — headings, motions and recorded votes are detected automatically, so spacing may differ from the original. The official copy governs.
PHONE: 315.435.3770 FAX: 315.435.3669 ONGOVED.COM Meeting Agenda December 14, 2021 8:00 AM Call to Order the Meeting of the Agency A. Approval of Minutes- November 9, 2021 B. Treasurer’s Report C. Payment of Bills D. Conflict of Interest Action Items 1. Stewart Hancock Partners LLC / Dunn Tire LLC (3101-21-12A) Second Meeting Stewart Hancock Partners LLC is proposing to build a 62,500 SF facility in the Town of Cicero. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination.
b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes.
Representative: Joseph Cattalani, Managing Member, Stewart Hancock Partner, LLC
GSPP Sentinel Heights Road, LLC is requesting the Board to consent to the sale of its membership interests.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board consenting to the sale of membership interest of a project
applicant. Representative: Jeffrey W. Davis, OCIDA Legal Counsel, Barclay Damon 3. Quantum Cool, LLC & Cryomech, Inc. (3101-19-02A) Meeting to Modify Quantum Cool, LLC is requesting the Board to consent to the sale of its interests in the Company Project Facility.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board approving the assignment of the right, title and interest in a Company Project Facility by Quantum Cool, LLC to Kelvin Kool LLC.
Representative: Charlie Wallace, Company Representative, Quantum Cool, LLC
Annual assessments of projects as required by General Municipal Law Section 874(12).
Representative: Nancy Lowery, Secretary, OCIDA Executive Session
Authorization to enter into a purchase contract for property.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing the adoption of a SEQRA determination.
b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the Executive Director to enter into a purchase contract and any related documents with respect to two parcels of property.
Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA Adjourn 2 a. A resolution of the Board approving the assignment of the right, title and interest in a Company Project Facility by Quantum Cool, LLC to Kelvin Kool LLC.
Representative: Charlie Wallace, Company Representative, Quantum Cool, LLC
a. Annual assessments of projects as required by General Municipal Law Section 874(12).
Representative: Nancy Lowery, Secretary, OCIDA Executive Session
Authorization to enter into a purchase contract for property.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing the adoption of a SEQRA determination.
b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the Executive Director to enter into a purchase contract and any related documents with respect to two parcels of property.
Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA Adjourn 2
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Regular Meeting Minutes November 9, 2021 A regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Tuesday, November 9, 2021 at 333 West Washington Street, Syracuse, New York in the large conference room on the first floor.
Patrick Hogan called the meeting to order at 8:02 am with the following:
PRESENT:
Patrick Hogan Janice Herzog Victor Ianno Steve Morgan Susan Stanczyk Kevin Ryan
ABSENT:
Fanny Villarreal
ALSO PRESENT:
Robert M. Petrovich, Executive Director Nate Stevens, Treasurer Nancy Lowery, Secretary Karen Doster, Recording Secretary Jeff Davis, Barclay Damon Law Firm Samantha Podlas, Barclay Damon Law Firm Carolyn Evans-Dean, Office of Economic Development Rebecca Shiroff, Office of Economic Development Len Rauch, Office of Economic Development Matt Acomb, NYCANNA, LLC Dennis Duval, NYCANNA, LLC Natalie Thompson, NYCANNA, LLC David Spotts, SSC Cicero LLC Catherine Johnson, COR APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – OCTOBER 6 & OCTOBER 19, 2021 Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved the regular meeting minutes of October 6, 2021 and October 19, 2021 meetings. Motion was
carried.
TREASURER’S REPORT Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of October 2021.
Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved the Treasurer’s Report for the month of October 2021. Motion was carried.
Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Payment of Bills Schedule #463.
Patrick Hogan asked if Park Strategies is a yearly payment. Nate Stevens stated he believes it is monthly and he will get him more detail on that after the meeting.
Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Kevin Ryan, the OCIDA Board approved the Payment of Bills Schedule #463 for $565,164.02. Motion was carried.
The Conflict of Interest was circulated and there were no conflicts reported.
Nancy Lowery stated a public hearing was held and a board member from the Town of DeWitt voiced his support for the project.
Matthew Acomb stated currently there are 4 major grow rooms with 12,000 cannabis. He stated there is a corporate move towards a new type of growing which is a two tier growing and this is the first stage of construction on this type of system. He stated it is going to expand up to 18,400 square feet of cannabis which will increase the wholesale and increase their sales to the dispensaries within the State overall.
2 Jeff Davis stated from a SEQR standpoint all of this will be inside the existing building and the prepared resolution identifies that. He stated the recommendation is a negative declaration under SEQR.
Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the NYCANNA, LLC project. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes for the NYCANNA, LLC project. Motion was carried.
Patrick Hogan asked if a public hearing was held. Nancy Lowery stated yes and there were no comments.
Robert Panasci stated this is a relatively small project in the sense of community solar projects. He stated it will be under 10 acres of land on Kirkville Street in the Town of Manlius. He stated they are proposing to build a 1.6 megawatts AC community solar project. He stated the project has received a special use permit and site plan approvals. He stated the Town Board issued a negative declaration under SEQR. He stated they are requesting exemptions from mortgage recording tax, sales tax and a PILOT for the real property taxes.
Janice Herzog asked if the principles are located in Boulder, Colorado. Robert Panasci stated RPNY is a subsidiary of Renewable Properties. He stated their main office is located in San Francisco and they are an owner operator. He stated they will develop, build and operate. He stated they have a slight presence in New York but their home office is in California.
Janice Herzog stated Wild Cat Renewables is also mentioned on the application and asked how that fits in. Robert Panasci stated Renewable Properties uses Wild Cat as the entity for development so they get leases and use Wild Cat as a subsidiary so they don’t have to create an 3 LLC until they get closer to permitting. He stated they don’t want to waste the money in resources putting up a new LLC so they use an intermediary but they are all under the control of Renewable Properties.
Janice Herzog stated the Board minutes from the Town of Manlius mentions the main company will retain ownership and not sell it like a lot of solar projects have been doing. Robert Panasci stated that is correct. He stated the intent is not to sell but things could change in the future and if they did, they would have to go back to the IDA Board and the Town of Manlius for approval. Steve Morgan asked how many construction jobs are going to be derived from this project and over a period of how long. Robert Panasci stated about 20-40 jobs created during the construction period for about 6 months.
Victor Ianno asked how many jobs once it is completed. Robert Panasci stated there is going to be lawn mowing and maintenance so once completed you are typically looking at .4 FTE.
Patrick Hogan asked if there is a change of ownership they must come back before this Board. Jeff Davis stated yes.
Nancy Lowery stated there were no comments at the public hearing.
Jeff Davis stated from a SEQR standpoint this project received a SEQR Negative Declaration from the Town of Manlius Planning Board. He stated there has been no change in the project in terms of what was proposed and approved. He stated the resolution before the Board is accepting and adopting the resolution by the Manlius Planning Board in recognition of the fact that there has been no change in the proposed project. He stated they underwent a full SEQR review at the Town level and that the action before this Board is the request.
Upon a motion by Kevin Ryan, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the RPNY Solar 5, LLC project. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions 4 from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes and mortgage recording taxes. Motion was
carried.
David Spotts stated SSC Cicero LLC is a 5 megawatt ground mounted solar facility. He stated they came before the Board on October 19. 2021 requesting a PILOT agreement which was ultimately approved. He stated today they are requesting the Board approve a change of control from SSC Cicero LLC to GSRP Development Company X LLC. He stated the majority interest is being sold to Goldman Sachs Renewable portfolio.
Samantha Podlas stated this is similar to what we have done before and it is just coming before the Board before the straight lease transaction closes rather than after. She stated all the documentation has been reviewed.
Jeff Davis stated they are requesting a change before closing so normally it is closed beforehand. He stated the documents state there is a requirement if there is going to be a change in ownership they come back before the Board. He stated in this case they already know what the change in ownership is going to be. He stated they are requesting approval to modify and extend to the new owner. He stated it is going into the Goldman Sachs portfolio. He stated it is a change in ownership pre-closing versus post-closing.
Patrick Hogan asked if they have gone before the Town Board. Jeff Davis stated they were fully
approved.
Robert Petrovich stated approvals were granted and a public hearing was held based on one entity and asked where we are in the continuing relative to this. He stated it strikes him as peculiar.
Patrick Hogan stated they were fully approved but this is a whole different entity that is managing this. He stated the Town Board obviously met with these people and now they are handing off the portfolio to Goldman Sachs.
5 Jeff Davis stated he is sure there is a transfer and ownership provision. He stated SSC Cicero LLC is still going to be the entity that received the permit. He stated we did a public hearing with SSC Cicero LLC and is still going to be the entity the Agency ends up closing with. He stated from our standpoint the entity that the Agency did a notice with is still the entity that we are going to close with. He stated from the Town standpoint he can only assume it is the same thing. He stated they have an ownership approval that they gave to “Entity A” and “Entity A” is still going to receive the special use permit approval.
Patrick Hogan stated they might get involved in managing part of it. Jeff Davis stated they may get involved with the decommissioning bonds and the other items requiring a backing by the entity that is going to construct it.
Janice Herzog stated it is important for people in the community to know which entity is owning and controlling because Goldman Sachs has acquired some of the other Agency solar projects and they are more of a global entity. Jeff Davis stated Goldman Sachs acquired the SSC Lysander project and was approved a couple months ago with a transfer of ownership after closing. He stated the entity that is acquiring SSC Cicero is the same entity that acquired SSC Lysander.
Janice Herzog stated a bigger question is we have a lot of these solar companies that have been bought off and a lot of them may funnel up to the same people. She asked if all the solar projects end up in the same spot.
Nancy Lowery stated she received a call from the Town of Cicero, they had gone on our website and saw this was occurring so she thinks they are monitoring this as well. She stated she thinks this is their first awareness of a transfer in ownership. She stated she is not sure how that effects Jeff Davis’s point and she is not sure they really understood.
David Spotts stated to bring some clarity to the discussion, John Switzer and himself are owners of SSC Cicero, LLC and will continue to be the owners of the land for the life of the project. He stated they had come before the Town Board as developers of the project and will remain to be in contact with the Town as the owners of the land for the life of the entity. He stated in addition the Town has accepted a decommissioning bond directly from Goldman Sachs. He stated the decommission has already been posted by GSRP.
6 Robert Petrovich asked if SSC came before the Board with a project in Lysander. David Spotts stated yes. Susan Stanczyk stated in the notes provided it says March 10, 2021 is when they closed. Nancy Lowery stated the project is closed.
David Spotts stated it is under construction right now and he is also the land owner in Lysander as well. He stated they have been in touch with the Town of Lysander regarding the project.
Patrick Hogan asked David Spotts if he will continue to manage the facility. David Spotts stated they are not involved with management or operation of the facility. He stated they own the land so they monitor what would impact them as a land owner like vegetation and storm water.
Janice Herzog asked if the operation, profits or anything of that nature would be handled and received by Goldman Sachs. David Spotts stated yes.
Jeff Davis asked if they are still going to close under the entity names SSC Cicero, LLC. David Spotts stated yes.
Robert Petrovich asked if they are going to close with the Town under the name of SSC Cicero, LLC and pull their permit under that entity. David Spotts stated yes.
Jeff Davis asked if they want to close with the IDA before they close on the property. David Spotts stated yes.
Jeff Davis stated normally the land has already been acquired before the closing with the IDA. He stated in this case SSC Cicero is requesting closing in advance of acquiring the land. He stated they will close with the IDA, pay the IDA fee, have everything there and then if they don’t close on the land, the deal goes away with IDA. He stated they want to close in the next week on this transaction and we are prepared to do that. He stated the closing they requested is in advance of them closing on the property.
Robert Petrovich asked if there is a specific reason for that. Jeff Davis stated he thinks it is the timing of when the closing is set up for the property. He stated he also believes this closing with OCIDA gets them the benefits they likely need to close and do the things they need on the 7 backend. He stated they need to show things are in place to move things forward. He stated there is a little bit of risk on their end and really no risk on the Agency end. He stated worst case scenario for them is the deal doesn’t happen, they have already closed with the IDA, they paid the IDA fee and they don’t receive any benefits. He stated the IDA fee is not refundable.
Kevin Ryan stated we have the arrangement with SSC but if they choose to convey interest to Goldman Sachs that is a business decision they are making and asked what the Agency’s concern is. He stated they have already done this in Lysander and asked if there is a concern with the way the Lysander project played out. He stated he does not see what the downside is to us.
Robert Petrovich stated we are just trying to get a better understanding of what is going on. Jeff Davis stated we have seen this with other solar and we are going to see it with most solar. He stated RPNY Solar’s intent is to own, construct and operate. He stated most solar in New York, especially community solar which is small scale, are going through change in ownership as they either start construction or just after construction. He stated what you are seeing in the industry is large entities that want to have solar in their portfolio because their clients demand it and acquiring a series of community solar allows you to acquire a lot of megawatts. He stated solar in New York is a big push right now. He stated a lot of companies get permits and approvals and then sell that asset to somebody that can construct, operate and own it.
Patrick Hogan stated his concern is the local town having to deal with out of state and sometimes out of country entities managing the property that they have not met before. Jeff Davis stated none of the solar entities we have been talking to are local. He stated they are all LLCs that have been created in New York.
Patrick Hogan stated it is an infant industry and we don’t know down the road what kind of management problems there might be. He stated this seems like a red flag to him.
Kevin Ryan stated from his perspective he feels more comfortable dealing with an entity like Goldman Sachs which is one of the gold standards in its industry, as opposed to a single purpose LLC whose sole purpose is to operate one LLC or in this case two solar farms in our community. He stated if that goes sideways they are not going to have the resources to keep the project afloat where Goldman Sachs does. He stated he feels more comfortable with it that way.
8 Janice Herzog stated that is a good point Mr. Ryan made but there is also the community side of it. She asked is a community impacted by a global owner who may not have a vested interest in the community other than solar power. She stated we keep being presented with these projects and maybe we can request transparency in the companies. Jeff Davis stated in the application they have to provide and identify the ownership breakdown of the applicant entity and if there is ever a change in ownership with any project that comes before this Board, it needs to come back for approval. He stated it is not just solar, it is everybody.
Janice Herzog asked who is RPNY’s parent company is and how does it work its way up. She stated we typically see the next wrung in the ladder but we don’t see it all the way up. She stated it would be helpful to have more transparency in where these companies are funneling to.
Steve Morgan asked if we are overstepping our boundaries saying we can’t approve a project because we don’t like who they are going to sell the company to. He asked if it is any of our business and who are we to tell them that. Jeff Davis stated the roll in this process is to do due diligence to determine whether the entity that you are going to provide the benefits to is an appropriate entity to provide benefits to. He stated is it registered to do business in the State of New York, are there any issues with litigation and those types of things. He stated so the answer is yes and beyond that we basically make sure the entity is a valid existing entity in New York and an appropriate entity to do business. He stated beyond that if they want to go through 14 different corporate ownership changes in the life of a PILOT and come before the Board every time they want to do that and explain why, then he thinks we are getting a little bit into their corporate business structure.
Robert Petrovich stated the only thing different about this is that they are coming to us pre closing. Jeff Davis agreed.
Kevin Ryan stated the Agency is the one granting the benefits or not granting the benefits and the question is whether we as an entity want to be doing this. He asked are we going to send the signal that we are going to look at every transaction a project makes in terms of their internal business structure with a magnifying glass. He stated he doesn’t know what the downside is to dealing with Goldman Sachs versus SSC solar.
9 Patrick Hogan stated he wants to make sure on behalf of the residents of Onondaga County that every one of these projects is a project that we can be proud of down the road. He stated in regards to Goldman Sachs, he doesn’t know if a Cicero Town Board member can call Goldman Sachs because of a trash pile on the property to be taken care of in an efficient manner.
Jeff Davis stated the town’s recourse would be to threaten to pull the special use permit for the project and bring them in as a violation of their special use permit at which point anybody who has invested in this can decide whether they want to risk the threat of losing their permit and investment or coming in before the Board to do something. He stated in this case Goldman Sachs is the entity that has put up the decommissioning bond. He stated if the town wants to remove it then they can utilize the decommissioning bonds and not use their own money to take it down and restore the land back to what it was. He stated all the decommissioning bonds put in place are sized through engineering estimates as to what the cost would be for removal of the facility after the life of the facility. He stated that if it has been provided to the town and if that is in place then the protection is that. He stated if any of these entities go belly up they can be removed. He stated we don’t have a decommissioning bond in normal projects but decommissioning bonds have become the main stay for solar facilities.
Robert Petrovich asked if we can cancel the PILOT. Jeff Davis stated if there is an issue with payment of the PILOT or violation under our agreements we can cancel the benefits.
Janice Herzog stated she thinks if we had a better understanding it would be easier. She stated these are not like a company setting up a manufacturing facility here, this is a different animal. She stated this is new in terms of development here and it is good have a better understanding of how this impacts our community with different ownerships.
Upon a motion by Kevin Ryan, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution consenting to the sale of membership interest of a project applicant. Motion was
carried.
(Steve Morgan left meeting) 10 Catherine Johnson stated COR Inner Harbor is seeking a one year extension on sales tax exemption for the Iron Pier project which is a mixed use building in the Inner Harbor with 112 market rate apartments as well as 37,000 square feet of commercial on the first floor. She stated they have been very successful with the apartments with over 95% occupied. She stated they continue to work on the commercial and that is the reason why they are asking for the extension. She stated the extension is to continue the build outs for new tenants. She stated they have two tenants right now comprised of 6,000 square feet. She stated they have been successful in attracting Meier’s Creek occupying 4,000 square feet which is under construction and hope to be open the end of this year. She stated that is a nice positive for this space which spurred on an increase in interest in the commercial space. She stated they have 3 leases under negotiation right now which would amount to about 7,500 square feet. She stated they are making progress on the commercial space as the inner harbor develops and if the aquarium goes forward that obviously is going to increase the tenant interest and development there. She stated they have not reached their sales tax exemption cap which is just over $2,400,000 and have taken advantage of about $1,000,000 of that.
Patrick Hogan stated he is happy Meier’s got through the onerous planning process of the City of Syracuse to go in there. He stated it is good to see the progress being made and sales and use tax doesn’t come into play unless you are actually building something so he is in favor of this. Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the extension of the sales and use tax exemption for COR Van Rensselaer Street Company II, LLC and COR Van Rensselaer Street Company III, Inc. (COR Inner Harbor Company, LLC Sub Project 1). Motion was carried.
Jeff Davis stated his recommendation is to vote to go into executive session to discuss the potential acquisition of lands and contracts.
11 Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board went into Executive Session at 8:50 am to discuss the potential acquisition of lands and contracts. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board adjourned Executive Session at 9:02 am. Motion was carried.
Jeff Davis stated the motion on the table is a SEQR resolution. He read through the pertinent SEQR parts.
Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the adoption of SEQR determination. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the Executive Director to enter into purchase contracts and any related documents with respect to a parcel of property. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board adjourned the meeting at 9:52 am. Motion was carried.
_________________________________ Nancy Lowery, Secretary 12 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Profit and Loss November 2021
Income
2410 Lease Income 1,500.00 2655 Other Operating Revenue 165,551.52 Total 500 Operating Revenue 167,051.52
2401 Interest Income 23.90 Total 501 Non-Operating Revenue 23.90
528 Pass thru Income 2,910.00 529 PILOT Income 2,529.36 Total 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 5,439.36 Total Income $172,514.78 GROSS PROFIT $172,514.78 Expenses
6406.50 Consulting Services 2,500.00 Total 6406 Other Professional Services 2,500.00 6407 Administrative Expense 81,382.44 6408 Meeting Expenses 59.81 6409 Conference Attendence 1,318.34 6410 Office Expense 772.67 6411 Memberships / Sponsorships 1,010.00 Total 6400 Operating Expense 87,043.26
6460 IDA General Legal 2,250.00 Total 6450 Barclay Damon 2,250.00 Total 6440 Legal Fees 2,250.00
6510.2 Site Analysis 143,623.30 6510.4 Other Expenses 4,900.00 6510.6 Taxes/SDC 2,018.22 6510.7 WPCP Marketing 2,350.96 6511 WPCP Closing Costs 2,027.50 Total 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 154,919.98 Total 6500 Agency Program Expenses 154,919.98 Accrual Basis Tuesday, December 7, 2021 02:36 PM GMT-05:00 1/2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Profit and Loss November 2021
6605.1 Pass thru Expense 2,910.00 6605.2 PILOT Expense 2,529.36 Total 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 5,439.36 Total 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 5,439.36 Total Expenses $249,652.60 NET OPERATING INCOME $ -77,137.82 Other Income 999.99 ROUNDING 0.01 Total Other Income $0.01 NET OTHER INCOME $0.01 NET INCOME $ -77,137.81 Accrual Basis Tuesday, December 7, 2021 02:36 PM GMT-05:00 2/2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of November 30, 2021
Current Assets Bank Accounts 200 Cash 0.00 200.1 Cash - M & T Checking 2,050,058.06 200.2 Cash - M & T Money Maker Savings 890,402.74 200.4 Destiny USA Restricted Cash -8,957.82 210 Petty Cash 50.00 Total 200 Cash 2,931,552.98 Total Bank Accounts $2,931,552.98 Accounts Receivable 380 Accounts Rec.
380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 14,000.00 Total 380 Accounts Rec. 14,000.00 Total Accounts Receivable $14,000.00 Other Current Assets 391 Long Tern Receivable 222,024.00 Total Other Current Assets $222,024.00 Total Current Assets $3,167,576.98 Accrual Basis Tuesday, December 7, 2021 02:53 PM GMT-05:00 1/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of November 30, 2021
Fixed Assets
101 White Pines Commerce Park 5,305,401.50
101.101 CHA GEIS 1 267,452.05 101.102 CHA GEIS 2 219,439.36 101.104 GEIS Reg Plan Board Overview 19,797.74 Total 101.1 WPCP GEIS 506,689.15 101.2 WPCP Legal 69,774.25 101.3 Engineering Services 52,675.00 101.301 Temporary Access 4,055.44 101.4 Environmental/Demo Services 10,318.98 Total 101.3 Engineering Services 67,049.42
101.501 Land Purchases 1,160,063.57 101.502 Closing Costs 3,168.14 Total 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 1,163,231.71 Total 101 White Pines Commerce Park 7,112,146.03 106 North Salina Properties 0.00 106.1 435 North Salina 17,083.55 106.3 435 North Salina Building 634,421.53 Total 106 North Salina Properties 651,505.08 107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42 Total 100 Land 8,368,491.53
104.1 Office Furniture 1,429.00 104.2 Equipment 4,588.00 Total 104 Machinery & Equipment 6,017.00 211 A/D Office Furniture -2,862.00 213 A/D Buildings -81,335.00 Total Fixed Assets $8,290,311.53 Other Assets 240 Blue Sky Redevelopment 1,641.76 Total Other Assets $1,641.76 TOTAL ASSETS $11,459,530.27 Accrual Basis Tuesday, December 7, 2021 02:53 PM GMT-05:00 2/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of November 30, 2021
Liabilities Current Liabilities Other Current Liabilities 600 Accounts Payable 0.00 600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 514,605.07 600.206 Mileage Reimbursement 92.34 600.208 BlueRock Energy Agreement Deposit 25,000.00 600.209 Syracuse Rail Overpayment 500.00 600.3 Onondaga County Loan 1,033,770.18 Total 600 Accounts Payable 1,573,967.59
602 Pass Thru Payable 2,910.00 603 PILOT Pass Thru 0.01 604 Other Pass Thrus 74,063.70 Total 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 76,973.71 Total Other Current Liabilities $1,650,941.30 Total Current Liabilities $1,650,941.30 Total Liabilities $1,650,941.30 Equity 3900 Equity Unreserved 6,735,894.07 3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 2,345,838.63 463 Reserve For Contracts 718,285.48 465 Equity - Unreserved -345,456.48 Net Income 354,027.27 Total Equity $9,808,588.97 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $11,459,530.27 Accrual Basis Tuesday, December 7, 2021 02:53 PM GMT-05:00 3/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency DRAFT Project Summary 12/8/2021 1. Project Dunn Tire, Inc/Stewart Hancock Partners, LLC 2. Project Number 3101-21-12A 3. Location Cicero 4. School District North Syracuse
5. Tax Parcel(s) 057.-02-29.4 Village - 7.Total Project Cost $ 5,870,030 8. Total Jobs 50 Land $ 300,330 8A. Job Retention 39 Site Work $ 100,000 8B: Job Creation 11 Building $ 4,560,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ 50,000 Equipment $ - Equipment Subject to NYS Production Exemption $ - Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 30,000 Financial Charges $ 200,000 Legal Fees $ 10,000 Other Cost Benefit Analysis Dunn Tire, Inc/Stewart Hancock Partners, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Estimated Abatement Cost $572,325 Sales Tax Abatement $250,000 Mortgage Recording Tax Abatement $37,425 Real Property Tax Relief $284,900 New Investment $33,536,533 PILOT Payments $362,303 Project Wages (10 years) $22,740,360 Construction Wages $1,305,900 Construct a 62,500 square foot building in the Town of Cicero Employee Benefits (10 years) $4,093,265 Project Capital Investment $4,960,330 Agency Fees $74,375 Benefit:Cost Ratio 58.60 :1 Dunn Tire, LLC/Stewart Hancock Partners, LLC DRAFT 12/8/2021 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet for 10 years OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 300,330 Projected investment $ 4,560,000 OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 1,414,400 OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 1,714,730 Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 113,356 Scheduled PILOT payments $ 362,303 Full Tax Onondaga North PILOT YEAR Exemption % Cicero - Total PILOT Payment w/o Net Exemption County Syracuse
1 100% $ 1,582 $ 1,591 $ 7,179 $ - $ 10,352 $ 59,107 $ 48,754 2 90% $ 2,373 $ 2,388 $ 10,772 $ - $ 15,532 $ 60,289 $ 44,757 3 80% $ 3,196 $ 3,215 $ 14,505 $ - $ 20,915 $ 61,495 $ 40,579 4 70% $ 4,050 $ 4,075 $ 18,383 $ - $ 26,508 $ 62,725 $ 36,217 5 60% $ 4,937 $ 4,967 $ 22,410 $ - $ 32,315 $ 63,979 $ 31,664 6 50% $ 5,858 $ 5,894 $ 26,592 $ - $ 38,344 $ 65,259 $ 26,914 7 40% $ 6,814 $ 6,856 $ 30,931 $ - $ 44,602 $ 66,564 $ 21,962 8 30% $ 7,806 $ 7,854 $ 35,434 $ - $ 51,094 $ 67,895 $ 16,801 9 20% $ 8,835 $ 8,889 $ 40,104 $ - $ 57,828 $ 69,253 $ 11,425 10 10% $ 9,902 $ 9,963 $ 44,947 $ - $ 64,811 $ 70,638 $ 5,827 TOTAL $ 55,354 $ 55,693 $ 251,256 $ - $ 362,303 $ 647,203 $ 284,900 Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Jobs Current/Actuals 39 Creation Goals 6 3 2 Total Employment Goals 39 45 48 50 50 50
CL CL 1-1/2" TOP COURSE NYSDOT ITEM 402.098303 9.5 MM 1-1/2" HOT MIX ASPHALT; TOP COURSE F9 SUPERPAVE HMA NYSDOT ITEM 403.178202M-TYPE 6F2 3" BINDER COURSE NYSDOT ITEM 402.198903 19MM 3" HOT MIX ASPHALT; BINDER COURSE A
F9 SUPERPAVE HMA C-008 12" 6" BASE COURSE COMPACTED SUBBASE COURSE NYSDOT ITEM 402.258903 37.5 MM NYSDOT ITEM 304.15M - OPTIONAL TYPE DETECTABLE F9 SUPERPAVE HMA, PLACED IN 2 LIFTS (2 LIFTS) 12"
SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED 5'
(2 LIFTS) PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY
OR APPROVED EQUAL CURB GEOGRID TENSAR BX1100 SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED OR APPROVED EQUAL PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY NORMAL DUTY HEAVY DUTY 3' 5' 3'
NOTE:
1. SEE SHEET C-003 FOR LIMITS OF HEAVY DUTY AND NORMAL DUTY PAVEMENT.
ASPHALT CONCRETE 5'-0"
A 3'-0" 5/8" MAX.
R 9" 5' 6" O 6"
FINISHED (WIDTH TO MATCH EXISTING) MONOPOUR CURB - 12" GRADE AT EDGE TOP OF 10"
SEE PAVEMENT SECTION COMPACTED NYSDOT ITEM 6 GUAGE 6"x 6" 2" SLOPE 1/4" PER FT. DETAILS FOR DEPTH OF SUBGRADE 304.15M WELD WIRE MESH 4" COURSES THIS SHEET 6" 1/2" R TA PE 4 RE A "
DA 6" T:
6" O 1
SUBGRADE 4"x4" MESH
NYSDOT ITEM 203.07 SELECT FILL BOTTOM OF CURB
COMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY SITE CURB TERMINAL NOTES:
1. CONCRETE SHALL BE 4500 P.S.I. (MIN.) AIR ENTRAINED CONCRETE. 4,000 P.S.I. AIR-ENTRAINED
2. FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED EVERY 25', MARKED JOINTS 6" SHALL BE AT 5' SPACING AND FORMED BY A GROOVING TOOL. SEE EXPANSION JOINT 1 1\2' DETAIL ON SHEET G-8. R ASPHALT FILLER (50-60)
HOT MIX ASPHALT; 6" DIRECTION OF TRAVEL.
18"
64' 3 4"
24' (VARIES) 1 - OPTIONAL TYPE 20' (TYP.) SEE SITE PLAN 20' (TYP.) 4" 9" 4"
NOTES:
1. CURB SHALL BE CAST IN PLACE; NYSDOT ITEM 609.04 - TYPE B150.
PIGMENTIC MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND. T.O.B. 4" WIDE YELLOW REFLECTORIZED TYPICAL SECTION 3 CL
1 STRIPES NYSDOT SPILL WAY
(ROTATED FOR CLARITY)
5' 1'-6" 12" 2" 4" TOPSOIL, SEED PEA GRAVEL PROPOSED GRADE SEE
& MULCH GRADING AND
PORCELAIN STEEL REFLECTORIZED SIGN COMPACTED DRAINAGE PLANS
4" WIDE YELLOW FACE WITH HANDICAP SYMBOL ABOVE AND SUBGRADE REFLECTORIZED REFLECTORIZED 9" TEXT "RESERVED FOR HANDICAPPED" PAVEMENT PAVEMENT STRIPES PAVEMENT SYMBOL - BELOW SECTION NYSDOT ITEM 685.12 BLUE NYSDOT ITEM 685.14 18" MIN. PERMEABLE SOIL MEETING 1'-0" 1/2" RADIUS 1'
12" WIDE SOLID YELLOW NYSDOT ITEM 208.0103 22 6" TOPSOIL, SEED
"VAN ACCESSIBLE" - TWO BIORETENTION AND DRY SWALE SOIL 10'-0" FILTER FABRIC AND MULCH 4" PAVEMENT STRIPES (TYP.) TOTAL MIRAFI 160N OR EQUAL NYSDOT ITEM 685.12 2" X 3" ANODIZED ALUMINUM POST -ONE MIRAFI 600X
2" PIECE (COLOR-CLEAR FINISH) OR APPROVED EQUAL
6" MIN.
10'-0"
3'-0" O.C. (TYP.) FINISHED GRADE 8" NYSDOT ITEM 203.07 MATERIAL 6'-8"
10'-0" 4" X 5" GALV. STEEL SLEEVE - FILL NO. 2 SCREEN-SIZE DESIGNATION MIRAFI 600X COMPACTED SLOPE TO WITH NON-METALLIC NON-SHRINK COMPACTED SUBGRADE HANDICAP OR APPROVED EQUAL SUBBASE
(TYP.) SIDE ELEV. UNDERDRAIN 4"Ø PERFORATED CORRUGATED
1'-0" POLYETHYLENE TUBING. 3'-6"
NOTE:
COMPACTED NOTES: NOTE: 1. PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE EPOXY REFLECTORIZED SUBGRADE NOT TO SCALE
AS SPECIFIED IN THE NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL. 1. CLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED EVERY AT THE START OF EACH FRONT ELEV. SECTION 685, AND IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE MUTCD. RUN PER DETAIL ON THIS SHEET
STRIPING DETAILS REQUIREMENTS. C DRY SWALE DETAIL
TOP OF SWALE TOP OF
GRADE STONE CHECK DAM SWALE 10'
1'-6" MIN. A (TYP.) 12' MIN. EXISTING
24'
C-009 EXISTING TRENCH EXCAVATION NOTE: GROUND 10' SIDE SLOPE PER THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF THE WYE IS 1'-5"
(SEE NOTE 1) OSHA REQUIREMENT MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE OF BELL TO THE PLAN VIEW
2'-6" BRANCH AND THE CENTERLINE OF THE NOTES: ITEM B-12 MAINLINE SEWER. 1. STONE SIZE - USE 2" STONE, OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT.
B 6" 6" 2. LENGTH - AS REQUIRED, BUT NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET
6" 6" 3. THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN 6".
12"
DIMENSION PLAN FLOW DIRECTION 3" MIN.
4. WIDTH 24' MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE EGRESS OCCURS.
VARIES VIEW 5. FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL) - WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE.
6. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARDS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE
PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS NOT POSSIBLE, A MOUNTABLE BERM 3' WIDE (MIN.) WITH 5:1 SLOPES
CREST WILL BE PERMITTED.
D MATERIAL 4" OR 6" BEND 7. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR
6" 2 6" 2 FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC OP DRESSING WITH
1/4" PER FT. MIN. 1 1 ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEAN OUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP
18" D + 24" ELEVATION TOE SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE
VIEW REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.
NOTES:
8. WASHING - WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
6" 1. MINIMUM COVER FROM FINISHED GRADE TO TOP OF PIPE SHALL BE AS 1 WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WITH STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO
FOLLOWS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: 1 4" OR 6" PIPE 18" ADJACENT SEDIMENT BASINS.
AS SPECIFIED FILTER FABRIC · DOMESTIC WATER - 5' MIN. MIRAFI 160N OR 9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
· SANITARY - 4' MIN. APPROVED EQUAL MAINLINE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN.
· STORM - VARIES SEWER SECTION B 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD LOCATE AS REQUIRED WITH APPROVAL BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
2. REFER TO SANITARY SEWER PROFILES FOR SANITARY DEPTHS. C-009
3. NATIONAL GRID SHALL PROVIDE INSTALLATION OF GAS MAIN, INCLUDING UNDISTURBED EARTH BACKFILL AND COMPACTION. 1'-6" MIN. BLEND OF NYSDOT NO. 1 3000 PSI CONCRETE (TYP.) & NO. 2 STONE NOT TO SCALE CRADLE TO EXTEND PROPOSED
MIN.
SIZE VARIES GRADE
9"
3/8" ANCHOR BOLTS THRU TOE 4"
18" RISER - CROSS SECTION DITCH NOT TO SCALE NOTE: BOTTOM
1. LATERALS TO VACANT LOTS WILL BE TERMINATED WITH THE PUBLIC SEWER PORTION, DESIGN BOTTOM 3000 PSI ℄ 3000 PSI
APPROXIMATELY 2' BEYOND THE CURB LINE AND CAPPED. PROVIDE 2"x4" PRESSURE TREATED CONCRETE 8" (MAX.)
12" LUMBER FROM PIPE CROWN TO WITHIN 6" OF GRADE FOR LOCATING. FILTER FABRIC CONCRETE
6" 2" VARIES 2"
APPROVED EQUAL 12"
(MIN.) 10'-0" NOT TO SCALE C-009 ELEVATION CROSS SECTION NOTES: NOTES:
1. STONE SHALL BE PLACED ON A FILTER FABRIC FOUNDATION. NOTE: 1. GALVANIZED END SECTION SHALL BE ORDERED ONE SIZE LARGER
THAN NOMINAL DIAMETER OF PIPE WHEN ATTACHING TO SICPP.
A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10'-0" SHALL BE MAINTAINED DOWNSTREAM DAM IS AT THE SAME ELEVATION OF THE TOE OF THE UPSTREAM DAM. BETWEEN WATER MAINS & ALL STORM & SANITARY SEWERS. ANY DEVIATION 2. END SECTIONS TO BE INSTALLED ON ALL PROPOSED STORM
OF THE MINIMUM 10'-0" HORIZONTAL SEPARATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE 3. EXTEND THE STONE A MINIMUM OF 1.5' BEYOND THE DITCH BANKS TO PREVENT CUTTING SEWER INLETS AND OUTLETS.
REVIEWING AGENCY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. AROUND THE DAM.
CORED. CONNECTION TO OR CHICKEN WIRE FENCING 8.3' (MAX.) SEDIMENT SEE NOTE NO. 7
5'-0" (MIN.) 5'-0" (MIN.) CONTROL FABRIC
ATTACHED USING 48" (MIN.)
WATER MAIN 1'-6" MIN. BETWEEN "HOG RINGS" OR FENCE POST
CENTERED OVER 2'-0"
BOTTOM OF WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER PLASTIC TIES WOVEN WIRE MESH 14
SANITARY OR AND TOP OF SEWER (MIN.)
1/2 GA. MIN. W/ 6" MESH
STORM SEWER SEWER TO EXTEND INTO SPACING MAX.
POINT WHERE PIPE MEETS FILTER CLOTH
THE INSIDE WALL OF THE COVER
PROFILE COMPACTED
NOTE: SOIL BACKFILL
IF MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCES SHOWN CAN NOT BE MET, PLAN 24" FRAME AND EXISTING GROUND
SEE CROSSING REQUIREMENTS BELOW.
ON MAIN SEWER PER SHOWN OR DIRECTED FLOW
WATER MAIN & SEWER CROSSING SEPARATION DETAIL SPECIFICATION H25 COMPACTED (MIN.) 6" LOADING SOIL BACKFILL
AS 5'-0" 5'-0" AS 6" (MIN.) INTO GROUND
6"
6" BRICK COURSES 2'-0" 3/8" MIN. CEMENT (MAX.) TOE-IN FABRIC (4 MAX.) MORTAR INSIDE
WATER MAIN AND OUT FIRST JOINT PRECAST TAPER "LUGGED-U" OR 6" OUTSIDE MIN. LESS THAN PRECAST BARREL TOP (ECCENTRIC) "T" STEEL LIMITS (TYP.) 18" SECTIONS 2, 3 AND 4 FT. (REVOLVED 90° FENCE POST NOTES: (TYP.) 6" 6" LENGTHS ASTM C478 FOR CLARITY)
(H-25 LOADING) "O" RING JOINT OR 1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AS INDICATED ON THE EROSION SECTION DETAIL
3000 PSI END APPROVED ALTERNATE, CONTROL PLANS. CONCRETE VIEW GROUT INSIDE AND OUT- ENCASEMENT OPENING FOR PIPE TO BE 4'-0" DIA SIDE OF JOINT WITH 2. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS ENCASE ALL JOINTS IN PRECAST. OR MACHINE NON-SHRINK MORTAR WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES. POSTS: STEEL EITHER T OR U TYPE OR 2" HARDWOOD
CONCRETE AS SHOWN CORED. CONNECTION TO BE
5" (MIN.) 3. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE FENCE: WOVEN WIRE 14.5 GAUGE 6" MAX. MESH OPENING
PROFILE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION. NOTE:
SLOPE 1/2" ON MORTAR FILTER CLOTH: MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH OF 120LBS. (ASTM D-16826)
1. ENCASE IN CONCRETE ALL SEWER JOINTS WITHIN 10 FT. OF WATER 12" EACH SIDE (1" MIN.) 4. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY CROSSING. SHALL BE OVER- LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. PREFABRICATED UNIT: MIRAFI ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUAL
15" MIN. WATER MAIN & SEWER CROSSING BRICK-MORTAR 6" LAYER OF NYSDOT ITEM BENCHWALL 5. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL
304.12 PRIOR TO SETTING REMOVED WHEN "BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. MANHOLE COMPACTED TO 6" 95% DENSITY 6. FENCE TO BE ALIGNED ALONG CONTOUR AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE.
6"
SEWER SEPARATION DETAIL ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVE AREAS.
TYPE "A" STANDARD PRECAST MANHOLE DETAIL SILT FENCE DETAIL D NOT TO SCALE G NOT TO SCALE
East Rochester, NY 1300 UNIVERSITY AVENUE T: 585.223.6440 ROCHESTER, NY 14607
F: 585.563.6371 WWW.HANLONARCHITECTS.COM
East Rochester, NY 1300 UNIVERSITY AVENUE T: 585.223.6440 ROCHESTER, NY 14607
F: 585.563.6371 WWW.HANLONARCHITECTS.COM