Machine-extracted (OCR) from the official document — formatting is approximate; the official copy governs.
335 MONTGOMERY STREET, FLOOR 2M, SYRACUSE, NY 13202
315.435.3770 • ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT@ONGOV.NET • ONGOVED.COM
Regular Meeting Agenda
April 9, 2026
Call to Order the Regular Meeting of the Agency
A. Approval of Annual Meeting Minutes: March 5, 2026
B. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes: March 5, 2026
C. Treasurer’s Report
D. Payment of Bills
E. Conflict of Interest
Action Items:
1. Twin Ponds HB, LLC (Project #3101-25-02A) First Meeting
The applicant is proposing to construct a residential community consisting of approximately
309 multifamily units, a commercial space, and recreational areas in the Town of Manlius.
Specific project amenities will include a well-equipped fitness center, a children’s play area, a
dog park, a new dock, and a covered pavilion.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing a public hearing.
Representatives: Charlie Breuer, Twin Ponds HB, LLC, Managing Member
Brody Smith, Twin Ponds HB, LLC, Counsel
2. National Grid – Easement Authorization
The Agency wishes to grant easements to National Grid over portions of lands owned by the
Agency for the purpose of building facilities to provide electric and gas services for the
White Pine Commerce Park.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing the execution of an easement in connection
with property located at White Pine Commerce Park for facilities to provide electric
and gas services.
Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director
3. White Pine Science & Technology Park
Page 1 of 71
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board designating OCIDA as lead agency with respect to a
coordinated review and determining to issue a Positive Declaration pursuant to the
State Environmental Quality Review Act.
b. A resolution of the Board finding that the draft Scoping Document is sufficient for
public review, opening a thirty-day public comment period during which a public
hearing will be held on April 30, 2026.
Representative: Jeffrey Davis, Agency Counsel
Adjourn
Page 2 of 71
Annual Meeting Minutes
March 5, 2026
An Annual meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Thursday,
March 5, 2026, at 335 Montgomery Street, Floor 2M, Syracuse, New York.
Randy Wolken called the meeting to order at 8:30 AM with the following in attendance:
PRESENT:
Randy Wolken
Elizabeth Dreyfuss
Leslie English
Alan Marzullo
Mark Muthumbi
ABSENT:
Cydney Johnson
Garard Grannell
ALSO PRESENT:
Robert Petrovich, Executive Director
Nate Stevens, Treasurer
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Robert Schoeneck, Assistant Treasurer
Evan Carter, Office of Economic Development
Jeffrey Davis, Esq., Agency Counsel
Amanda Fitzgerald, Esq., Agency Counsel
Approval of Meeting Minutes: March 6, 2025
Upon motion by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, the Board approved the Annual
meeting minutes of March 6, 2025. Motion was carried.
Action Items:
1. Board Appointments
Randy Wolken read the Agency Action requested, “A resolution of the Board appointing
Elizabeth Dreyfuss as Vice Chair.” Motion was made by Leslie English, seconded by Mark
Muthumbi. Motion was carried.
Page 3 of 71
2. Slate of Board Members for the 2026 Agency Fiscal Year
Randy Wolken, Chair
Elizabeth Dreyfuss, Vice Chair
Leslie English
Cydney Johnson
Garard Grannell
Alan Marzullo
Mark Muthumbi
The Slate of Board Members was reviewed.
3. Slate of Committee Members for the 2026 Agency Fiscal Year
Audit Committee
Leslie English, Chair
Cydney Johnson
Alan Marzullo
Governance Committee
Elizabeth Dreyfuss, Chair
Garard Grannell
Randy Wolken
Finance Committee
Randy Wolken, Chair
Elizabeth Dreyfuss
Mark Muthumbi
The Slate of Committee Members was reviewed.
4. 2025 Internal Controls Report
Alexis Rodriguez noted to the Board that per the Authority’s Budget Office (ABO), the
Agency is required to have an Internal Controls Report to measure how the Agency has done
throughout the current year.
A. Rodriguez advised that the Agency staff believes that they have met all the requirements
in the report adequately.
Randy Wolken read the Agency Action requested, “A resolution of the Board to approve the
Agency’s 2025 Internal Controls Report.” Motion was made by Alan Marzullo, seconded by
Elizabeth Dreyfuss. Motion was carried.
Page 4 of 71
5. 2025 Operations & Accomplishments Report
A. Rodriguez noted that this report explains what the Agency has done in 2025
regarding projects that are currently pending, projects that have closed, ongoing
developments, and outreach.
Randy Wolken commented that it was a busy year.
Randy Wolken read the Agency Action requested, “A resolution of the Board to approve the
Agency’s 2025 Operations & Accomplishments Report.” Motion was made by Leslie
English, seconded by Elizabeth Dreyfuss. Motion was carried.
6. 2025 Performance Measurement Report
A. Rodriguez noted that this report lays out the performance goals of the Agency for 2025
and how they were met. The report also includes the public meetings held for the year.
Randy Wolken commented that the Agency was highly successful.
Randy Wolken read the Agency Action requested, “A resolution of the Board to approve the
Agency’s 2025 Performance Measurement Report.” Motion was made by Mark Muthumbi,
seconded by Alan Marzullo. Motion was carried.
7. 2025 Real Property Report
A. Rodriguez noted that the ABO requires the Agency to generate a report of the properties
that the Agency owns. A. Rodriguez advised that the majority of properties that the Agency
owns are on the White Pine Commerce Park, and there are a few properties on Hiawatha
Blvd. that are the Roth Steel site.
Randy Wolken read the Agency Action requested, “A resolution of the Board to approve the
Agency’s 2025 Real Property Report.” Motion was made by Alan Marzullo, seconded by
Leslie English. Motion was carried.
Motion to adjourn was made by Elizabeth Dreyfuss and seconded by Alan Marzullo at 8:35 AM.
___________________________________
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Page 5 of 71
Regular Meeting Minutes
March 5, 2026
A Regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Thursday,
March 5, 2026, at 335 Montgomery Street, Floor 2M, Syracuse, New York.
Randy Wolken called the meeting to order at 8:41 AM with the following in attendance:
PRESENT:
Randy Wolken
Elizabeth Dreyfuss
Alan Marzullo
Mark Muthumbi
Leslie English
ABSENT:
Cydney Johnson
Garard Grannell
ALSO PRESENT:
Robert Petrovich, Executive Director
Nate Stevens, Treasurer
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Robert Schoeneck, Assistant Treasurer
Evan Carter, Assistant Secretary
Jeffrey Davis, Esq., Agency Counsel
Amanda Fitzgerald, Esq., Agency Counsel
Mike Lisson, Agency Auditor
Brianah Lane, Agency Auditor
Patrick Rock, Jordan Landing LLC and Jordan Landing Housing Development Fund Corporation
(via Zoom)
Approval of Meeting Minutes: December 11, 2025
Upon motion by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, seconded by Leslie English, the Board approved the Regular
meeting minutes of December 11, 2025. Motion was carried.
Approval of Meeting Minutes: January 8, 2026
Upon motion by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Leslie English, the Board approved the Regular
meeting minutes of January 8, 2026. Motion was carried.
Page 6 of 71
Treasurer’s Report:
Nate Stevens gave a brief overview of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of February 2026.
Upon motion by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Mark Muthumbi, the Board approved the Treasurer’s
Report for the month of February 2026. Motion was carried.
Payment of Bills:
Nate Stevens gave a brief overview of the Payment of Bills.
N. Stevens highlighted the PILOT payments totaling over $7 million to local municipalities.
Robert Petrovich affirmed that $7.85 million is significant to highlight.
Upon motion by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, seconded by Leslie English, the Board approved the Payment of
Bills. Motion was carried.
Action Items:
1. 2025 Agency Audit
R. Petrovich noted that the Audit Committee had made a recommendation to accept the 2025
Agency Audit.
Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board approving the
2025 Audit of the Agency.” Motion was made by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, seconded by Alan
Marzullo. Motion was carried.
2. Jordan Landing LLC and Jordan Landing Housing Development Fund Corporation
(Project #3101-25-07A)
The applicant is proposing to construct 65 mixed-income housing units on approximately 8
acres of currently vacant land in the Village of Jordan. The project includes a community
room, fitness area, supporting housing services, offices, and laundry facilities.
Jeffrey Davis explained that this project had been put before the Board previously and the
application was accepted and a public hearing was authorized. While doing the Agency’s
review, Agency counsel noticed that at the local level, they conducted an uncoordinated
SEQR review, meaning that the Agency was not a part of the review. He explained that in
order for the Board to act, the Agency needs to do its own SEQR determination. In doing so,
Page 7 of 71
the Agency has concluded that it is a Type I Action under SEQR, requiring a coordinated
review of the agencies that have not already looked at the review.
J. Davis advised that the action in front of the Board is one to declare the Agency’s intent to
be Lead Agency under SEQR. If the action is approved, notices would be sent to all other
involved agencies. They will have 30 days to respond if they agree with OCIDA being Lead
Agency. After this, OCIDA will be able to move forward with a SEQR determination that all
other involved agencies will be bound by.
R. Petrovich noted for the Board’s edification that there was a public hearing held, and the
project will need to come before the Board again for the approval of benefits.
Mark Muthumbi questioned whether the feedback from the public hearing is pertinent to this
action.
R. Petrovich explained that the Agency understands that there is a communication breakdown between the Applicant and the localities (School District, Town, and Village). His understanding is that the Applicant and the localities are engaging currently and working through the issues to better understand the project. In addition to that, the Agency staff is working through the issues regarding the incentives. The Agency has not determined a final incentive proposal yet. The Agency is encouraging the Applicant to engage with the localities to help them understand the incentives proposed and why they’re needed. Mark Muthumbi noted that there seemed to be general support for the project, but there was concern over the transparency of communication. J. Davis stated that it’s important to note that the project has already been approved at the local level and received zoning approval prior to the submission of an OCIDA application. Amanda Fitzgerald noted that the Applicant could procedurally continue with the proposed project by zoning standards, but they submitted an application to the Agency stating that but for the benefits, the project could not move forward.
Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested of, “A resolution of the Board declaring the
project a Type I action under SEQRA and the Agency’s intent to be Lead Agency for a
coordinated environmental review.” Motion was made by Mark Muthumbi, seconded by
Elizabeth Dreyfuss. Motion was carried.
3. White Pine Science & Technology Park EAF
Page 8 of 71
R. Petrovich explained that this item is relating to property that the Agency owns, the White
Pine Science & Technology Park, which is directly south of the Micron campus at the
intersection of Rt. 31 and Caughdenoy Rd. The property is the southeast corner that is
roughly 106 acres. He stated that the Agency is looking to develop the site in support of the
Micron project in order to enhance the ability of supply chain companies to locate proximal
to the Micron campus.
R. Petrovich advised that this action would be the first step of being able to advance the site
for environmental review under SEQR, which is necessary to advance the development of the
site for supply chain companies. The Agency has completed an EAF that has been proposed
to the Board. The Agency needs approval of the proposed EAF in order to keep the process
moving forward.
J. Davis noted that this action will involve the Agency declaring their intent to be Lead Agency for a Type I coordinated review under SEQR. The first step is to send out notices to all the interested and involved agencies that have been identified in the EAF. If the Board approves this action, the notices will be sent out and those agencies will have 30 days to respond. Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board declaring the project a Type I action under SEQRA and the Agency’s intent to be Lead Agency for a coordinated environmental review.” Motion was made by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Leslie English. Motion was carried. 4. Town of Dewitt Real Property Purchase and Development Request for Proposals The Agency is proposing to issue a request for proposals for the purchase and development of the certain real property in the Town of Dewitt. R. Petrovich noted that the Agency took an assignment of the OHB Redev contract before the end of 2025, and just closed on the contract with the County earlier in the week. R. Petrovich stated the only outstanding issues that remain for this property are associated with the Macy’s parcel that is owned by Benderson Development, which the Agency is currently working towards acquiring by the Eminent Domain Procedure Law.
R. Petrovich noted that now that the landscape has changed with Micron’s groundbreaking,
the Agency believes that this property is prime for redevelopment as the County Executive
stated in the news that morning. The hope is that not only will elements of the OHB Redev
Page 9 of 71
concept advance, but also light manufacturing, office, and supply chain related activities that
will complement the area.
R. Petrovich advised that the Agency staff has briefed the Board thoroughly on the RFP and
the Agency will be finalizing the proposal following the meeting.
R. Petrovich noted that the final version of the RFP will not be substantially different from
the one that was reviewed with the Board members previously, noting only minor changes
made. The RFP will be released on Monday.
R. Petrovich stated that the Agency is excited about this opportunity to advance the
development of the site. He advised that he’s hopeful that the Agency will receive good
responses and the Board will reconvene in the next couple of months to make a
recommendation and award a contract.
Elizabeth Dreyfuss commented that this has been a long process and it’s exciting getting to
this stage. She noted that the community will appreciate the movement forward.
R. Petrovich pointed out that Elizabeth Dreyfuss has been here for every part of this
redevelopment.
Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board authorizing the
issuance of a request for proposals for the purchase and development of certain real property
in the Town of Dewitt.” Motion was made by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, seconded by Alan Marzullo.
Motion was carried.
5. Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC (Project #3101-23-07A)
Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC is requesting an extension of the
termination date of their sales and use tax exemption.
R. Petrovich advised that the Board took an action in November to grant a four-year time
term for the sales and use tax benefit that was approved for the Micron project. One of the
things that has come out of the communications of the Agency and Micron is that getting
Fabs 1 & 2 online will take approximately 9-10 years. As a result of that, Micron has
requested that the term of the sales and use tax benefit be extended out to that time horizon.
R. Petrovich stated that under consultation with counsel and research with the ABO, this is
not an issue, as Micron is not asking for an increase in the benefit amount. He recalled that
this is not an uncommon action for the Board to grant these extensions.
R. Petrovich noted that his recommendation to the Board is to grant this extension in support
of the project.
Page 10 of 71
Randy Wolken commented that he finds this request to be very reasonable.
J. Davis noted that this time schedule aligns with the construction schedule that was laid out in their original application that was approved by the Board. This action would be aligning the application and the benefits that were approved at the time with that schedule. Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board authorizing an extension of the sales and use tax exemption of Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC.” Motion was made by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Mark Muthumbi. Motion was carried. 6. Review and Acceptance of the Agency’s Policies and Bylaws 1. Defense and Indemnification Policy 2. Whiteblower Policy 3. Credit and Loan Policy 4. Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy 5. Compensation, Reimbursement and Attendance Policy 6. Local Access Policy 7. Investment Policy 8. Travel Policy 9. Procurement Policy 10. Property Disposition Policy 11. Real Property Acquisition Policy Alexis Rodriguez noted that as discussed in the Governance Committee meeting, the policies were revised in January 2025, and since then no changes have been made. Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested of “A resolution of the Board accepting the Agency’s policies and bylaws.” Motion was made by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, seconded by Leslie English. Motion was carried. 7. Review and Acceptance of Committee Charters A. Rodriguez noted that no changes have been made to the Charters.
Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested of “A resolution of the Board accepting the
Governance and Audit Committee Charters.” Motion was made by Alan Marzullo, seconded
by Elizabeth Dreyfuss. Motion was carried.
Page 11 of 71
8. Executive Session
J. Davis requested to enter into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing proposed
acquisitions or sale of real property.
Motion to enter Executive Session was made by Leslie English, seconded by Alan Marzullo.
Motion to come out of Executive Session was made by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, seconded by
Alan Marzullo.
Motion to adjourn was made by Alan Marzullo and seconded by Elizabeth Dreyfuss at 9:18 AM.
___________________________________
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Page 12 of 71
March 31, 2026
Revenue / Expense / Income Current Period Current YTD
Operating/Non-Op Revenue 60,657 10,817,937
Administrative Expense 70,526 212,644
Operating/Program Expense 121,120 387,538
Net Ordinary Income (130,989) 10,217,755
Current Assets Current YTD
Total Cash 18,923,421
Less Pass Through Received -
Net Cash 18,923,421
Page 13 of 71
Statement of Activity
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
March 1-31, 2026
TOTAL
Revenue 500 Operating Revenue 2410 Lease Income 12,073.64 Total for 500 Operating Revenue $12,073.64 501 Non-Operating Revenue 2401 Interest Income 48,582.93 Total for 501 Non-Operating Revenue $48,582.93 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 529 PILOT Income 36,441.12 Total for 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue $36,441.12 550 WPCP Pass Thru Revenue 127,451.11 Total for Revenue $224,548.80 Gross Profit $224,548.80
Expenditures 6400 Operating Expense 6406 Other Professional Services 6406.50 Consulting Services 6,000.00 Total for 6406 Other Professional Services $6,000.00 6407 Administrative Expense 70,525.90 6409 Conference Attendence 2,477.47 6410 Office Expense 260.34 6411 Memberships / Sponsorships 7,175.00 6414 Marketing 12,243.00 Total for 6400 Operating Expense $98,681.71 6440 Legal Fees 6450 Barclay Damon 6460 IDA General Legal 1,367.50 6480 Roth Legal 30.00 Total for 6450 Barclay Damon $1,397.50 Total for 6440 Legal Fees $1,397.50 6500 Agency Program Expenses 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 6510.3 Legal 15,773.91 6510.7 WPCP Marketing 1,659.74 Total for 6510 White Pine Commerce Park $17,433.65 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 6530.3 Engineering 33,690.71 Total for 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West $33,690.71 6540 3649 Erie Blvd E 6540.5 Legal 24,687.00 Total for 6540 3649 Erie Blvd E $24,687.00 Total for 6500 Agency Program Expenses $75,811.36
Page 14 of 71
Accrual Basis Friday, April 03, 2026 05:36 PM GMTZ 1/2
Statement of Activity
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
March 1-31, 2026
TOTAL
6514 White Pine Science & Technology Park
6514.2 Engineering 11,399.00
Total for 6514 White Pine Science & Technology Park $11,399.00
6600 Non-Operating Expenses
6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses $1,060,659.90
6607 Micron - Pass Thru 1,062.50
Total for 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses $1,061,722.40
Total for 6600 Non-Operating Expenses $1,061,722.40
6610 WPCP Pass Thru Expenses
6610.6 Barton & Loguidice 4,356.00
Total for 6610 WPCP Pass Thru Expenses $4,356.00
Total for Expenditures $1,253,367.97
Net Operating Revenue -$1,028,819.17
Net Other Revenue
Net Revenue -$1,028,819.17
Page 15 of 71
Accrual Basis Friday, April 03, 2026 05:36 PM GMTZ 2/2
Statement of Financial Position
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
As of Mar 31, 2026
TOTAL
Assets
Current Assets
Bank Accounts
200.6 NBT OCIDA Savings 7,505,966.26
200.7 NBT - WPCP Savings 10,020,403.08
200 Cash $0.00
200.5 NBT Checking 1,397,051.58
Total for 200 Cash $1,397,051.58
Total for Bank Accounts $18,923,420.92
Accounts Receivable
380 Accounts Rec.
380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 535,792.54
Total for 380 Accounts Rec. $535,792.54
Total for Accounts Receivable $535,792.54
Other Current Assets
480 Prepaid Expenses
480.4 Credit Balance on Card -1,473.67
Total for 480 Prepaid Expenses -$1,473.67
Total for Other Current Assets -$1,473.67
Total for Current Assets $19,457,739.79
Fixed Assets
100 Land
101 White Pines Commerce Park -$1,659.44
101.2 WPCP Legal 9,177.00
101.3 Engineering Services $0.00
101.4 Environmental/Demo Services 110.00
Total for 101.3 Engineering Services $110.00
Total for 101 White Pines Commerce Park $7,627.56
105 3649 Erie Blvd East 13,615,469.14
107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42
108 White Pine Science & Technology Park 2,140,557.00
Total for 100 Land $16,368,494.12
104 Machinery & Equipment
104.1 Office Furniture 2,076.11
104.2 Equipment 4,589.00
Total for 104 Machinery & Equipment $6,665.11
211 A/D Office Furniture -6,018.00
250 Investment in Real Property 30,756,703.00
Total for Fixed Assets $47,125,844.23
Page 16 of 71
Accrual Basis Friday, April 03, 2026 05:31 PM GMTZ 1/2
Statement of Financial Position
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
As of Mar 31, 2026
TOTAL
Other Assets
240 Blue Sky Redevelopment 1,641.76
Total for Other Assets $1,641.76
Total for Assets $66,585,225.78
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable
300 WPCP Pass Thru Payable 4,365.44
Total for Accounts Payable $4,365.44
Other Current Liabilities
600 Accounts Payable $0.00
600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 88,010.48
600.209 Syracuse Rail Overpayment 500.00
600.3 Onondaga County Loan $28,079,656.77
600.31 Accrued Interest - OC Note Payable 3,095,059.00
Total for 600.3 Onondaga County Loan $31,174,715.77
600.4 Micron Deposit 244,694.54
Total for 600 Accounts Payable $31,507,920.79
Total for Other Current Liabilities $31,507,920.79
Total for Current Liabilities $31,512,286.23
Long-term Liabilities
600.5 Onondaga County Loan - Non WPCP 11,075,298.64
Total for Long-term Liabilities $11,075,298.64
Total for Liabilities $42,587,584.87
Equity
3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 2,345,838.63
463 Reserve For Contracts 368,811.84
465 Equity - Unreserved 4,017.16
3900 Equity Unreserved 10,678,874.55
Net Income 10,600,098.73
Total for Equity $23,997,640.91
Total for Liabilities and Equity $66,585,225.78
Page 17 of 71
Accrual Basis Friday, April 03, 2026 05:31 PM GMTZ 2/2
ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILLS - SCHEDULE #515 April 9, 2026
GENERAL EXPENSES 1. ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING FEDERATION* $ 340.00 2026 Planning Symposium 2. MACNY, THE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION** $ 1,175.00 2025 Membership 3. ONONDAGA COUNTY TREASURER*** $ 2,501,849.32 Purchase of Tax Parcel #063.-01-02.3 4. BARTON & LOGUIDICE $ 2,660.50 WPSTP - Inv #160118 5. LOVELL AND ASSOCIATES $ 3,000.00 March 2026 Consulting 6. SELECTIVE $ 41,402.50 Insurance - 3649 Erie Blvd 7. HAYLOR FREYER & COON, INC. $ 93,375.00 Insurance - 3649 Erie Blvd 8 BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 23,138.44 OCIDA - Shoppingtown - Inv #5383633 9 BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 1,816.50 WPSTP - Inv #5383635 10 BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 810.00 Retained Corporate & Public Finance Matters - Inv #5383636
9 BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 1,461.00
Site 31 - Inv #5383639
10 BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 2,335.00
Micron Retained OCIDA Support - Inv #5383631
11. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 152.50
Micron - EDPL Utility Easements - Inv #5383634
12. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 39,642.00
Neighbors for a Better Micron - Inv #5383630
13. NEW YORK STATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL $ 2,300.00
Conference Registration
14. ONONDAGA COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY $ 52.31
8538 Caughdenoy Road
15. LEONARD RAUCH $ 676.38
Conference Expenses
16. ROBET PETROVICH $ 192.85
Mileage Reimbursement
17. Robert Schoeneck $ 56.00
Conference Expense
TOTAL $ 2,716,435.30
*Ratification of check dated 3/11/2026
**Ratification of check dated 3/12/2026
***Ratification of check dated 4/1/2026
Page 18 of 71
PAYMENT OF BILLS - SCHEDULE #515
April 9, 2026
PILOT Payments
1. ONONDAGA COUNTY* $ 56,808.99
2026 PILOT Payment
2. TOWN OF CICERO* $ 65,935.55
2026 PILOT Payment
3. NORTH SYRACUSE CSD* $ 229,544.80
2026 PILOT Payment
TOTAL: $ 352,289.34
*Ratification of Checks dated 3/30/2026
Page 19 of 71
4/7/2026
Project: Twin Ponds HB, LLC Project Number: 3101-25-02A
Location: Manlius School District: Fayetteville-Manlius CSD
Project Type: Housing
Tax Parcel(s): 086.-02-06.1 Village: N/A
Total Project Cost: $ 114,813,168 8. Total Jobs 7 Land Acquisition $ - 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work/Demo $ 7,876,505 8B: Job Creation 7 Building Construction & Renovation $ 94,860,561 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ 650,000 Equipment $ - Project Soft Cost $ 11,426,102
Community Investment /Abatement Project Description
Fiscal Impact ($)
Abatement Summary $8,645,954
Sales Tax Abatement $4,800,000
Mortgage Tax Abatement $641,519
Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $3,204,435
The applicant is proposing to construct a residential community consisting of
Community Investment $126,814,235 approximately 309 multifamily units, a commercial space, and recreational areas in
PILOT Payments $2,972,710 the Town of Manlius.
Project Salaries and Benefits Estimated (10 yrs) $2,934,157
Construction Benefit Estimate $6,094,200
Total Project Cost $114,813,168
Investment:Abatement Ratio 14.67 :1
© 2026 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency. All rights reserved.
Page 20 of 71
Twin Ponds HB, LLC
A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet
for 10 years
OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 583,000
Projected investment $ 94,860,561
OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 20,274,500
OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 20,857,500
Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 172,661
Scheduled PILOT payments $ 2,972,710
Full Tax
County PILOT School
PILOT YEAR Exemption % Town Village Total PILOT Payment w/o Net Exemption
Amount District
PILOT
1 100% $ 1,737 $ 2,520 $ 11,511 $ - $ 15,769 $ 564,137 $ 548,369
2 90% $ 7,934 $ 11,510 $ 52,573 $ - $ 72,018 $ 575,420 $ 503,402
3 80% $ 14,378 $ 20,858 $ 95,274 $ - $ 130,510 $ 586,928 $ 456,418
4 70% $ 21,077 $ 30,576 $ 139,661 $ - $ 191,314 $ 598,667 $ 407,353
5 60% $ 28,037 $ 40,674 $ 185,785 $ - $ 254,497 $ 610,640 $ 356,143
6 50% $ 35,268 $ 51,164 $ 233,699 $ - $ 320,131 $ 622,853 $ 302,722
7 40% $ 42,777 $ 62,057 $ 283,455 $ - $ 388,289 $ 635,310 $ 247,021
8 30% $ 50,572 $ 73,366 $ 335,108 $ - $ 459,045 $ 648,016 $ 188,971
9 20% $ 58,662 $ 85,102 $ 388,713 $ - $ 532,476 $ 660,977 $ 128,500
10 10% $ 67,055 $ 97,278 $ 444,328 $ - $ 608,661 $ 674,196 $ 65,535
TOTAL $ 327,496 $ 475,107 $ 2,170,107 $ - $ 2,972,710 $ 6,177,145 $ 3,204,435
Year
0 1 2 3 4 5
Jobs
Current/Actuals
Creation Goals 2 2 3
Total
Employment
Goals 0 2 4 7 7 7
© 2026 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency. All rights reserved.
Page 21 of 71
Page 22 of 71
Page 23 of 71
Page 24 of 71
Page 25 of 71
Page 26 of 71
Page 27 of 71
Page 28 of 71
Page 29 of 71
Page 30 of 71
Page 31 of 71
Page 32 of 71
Page 33 of 71
Page 34 of 71
Page 35 of 71
Page 36 of 71
Page 37 of 71
Page 38 of 71
Page 39 of 71
Page 40 of 71
Page 41 of 71
Page 42 of 71
Page 43 of 71
Page 44 of 71
OCIDA Applica on Addendum – Twin Ponds HB, LLC – 04/01/2026
Sec on I
D) Has the owner/applicant received benefits from OCIDA, SIDA, NYS or OCDC in the past?
Twin Ponds HB, LLC has not received benefits from any of the agencies above in the past.
However, Braxton LLC, an owner of Twin Ponds HB, LLC, did receive benefits from OCIDA as an
owner of Trey Jay LOSO, LLC in January 2022. The LOSO project is located at 22 Loso Drive,
Cicero, NY, 13039 (Formally 6477 Lakeshore Rd). These benefits included a $2,500,000 sales tax
exemp on and a $353,000 mortgage tax exemp on.
Sec on II
D) A statement that the Project described in this applica on would not be undertaken but for
the financial assistance provided by the Agency.
The development of 5440 North Burdick Street, Tax Parcel No. 086.-02-06.1 (the “Property”) will
not proceed without financial assistance from OCIDA because of the pressure from the current
financial environment and increased material and labor cost.
E) Descrip on of Project: Please a ach a detailed narra ve of the proposed Project. Please
a ached copies of site plans, sketches or maps. This narra ve should include, but is not
limited to:
Twin Ponds HB LLC is a single purpose LLC which currently owns the property and seeks to
construct a residen al community consis ng of residen al dwelling units, commercial tenant
space and recrea onal areas (the “Project”). We an cipate construc on beginning by the fourth
quarter of 2026. The Project will include a clubhouse, amenity areas for recrea on, roadways,
parking areas, landscaping, and u li es. Ten percent of the units will be workforce housing.
The project will include approximately 309 residen al units, made up of a mix of one, two and
three-bedroom units. All but five of the apartments will be located in three modern five story
buildings. A single two and three-story mixed-use building will also be constructed that will
house five apartments on the second and third floors and approximately 5,700 square feet of
commercial space on the ground floor.
Specific project ameni es will include a well-equipped fitness center within the clubhouse. Near
the pond there will also be separate enclosed areas accommoda ng both a children’s play area
and a dog park. The pond will feature a new dock which can be used to fish or launch non-
motorized watercra such as kayaks for pleasure boa ng. Adjacent to the pond residents will
also find a covered pavilion for outdoor picnics and entertaining alongside the water.
Also, both the Town and Village of Manlius support the crea on of a pedestrian bridge over
neighboring Limestone Creek. This would allow future access from the property directly to the
New York State Erie Canalway Trail. The Canalway is a significant nearby amenity offering
Page 45 of 71
outdoor enthusiasts the ability to walk, bike and run hundreds of miles all across Upstate NY!
Funding for this connec on is not yet in place.
The Manlius Town Board has stated that there is currently an urgent need for more apartment
units in the community. Apartments are needed to accommodate new workers, young people
and seniors who desire to age in place. Notwithstanding the urgent need for apartments in
Manlius, development pa erns and previous zoning regula ons have blocked needed
development in the past.
The Property represents a unique opportunity to develop land that is situated in a par cularly
desirable loca on in terms of proximity to exis ng infrastructure, services and employment. The
loca on of the site is ideal for the development of apartments and the Project will result in much
needed infill, as it is surrounded by retail, senior housing and medical office space.
Very li le addi onal infrastructure is needed to advance the Project. The Property is also
uniquely suited to accommodate new apartments because it is not situated near any exis ng
single-family dwellings. Put simply, the introduc on of addi onal residen al density can be
accomplished without disrup ng the character of any exis ng single-family neighborhoods.
The Project has the poten al to provide much needed outdoor recrea on space while offering
pedestrian connec ons between the Village of Faye eville, Northeast Medical Center and
Faye eville Town Center. The Project includes extensive sidewalks and walking trails around the
perimeter of the pond and along Burdick Street. This system of trails and sidewalks will provide
much needed pedestrian connec ons to neighboring proper es now and in the future.
The Manlius Town Board has expressed its support for this Project by overlaying a floa ng zone
(approving a district plan for this Project) where previously this type of development would have
otherwise been prohibited by code. More recently, the Town Planning Board provided a
unanimous SEQRA Nega ve Declara on and Unanimous Site Plan approval for the project. This
development is needed and desired by the community and will provide needed housing in an
area where there is presently a lack of mul -family housing. Further, the District Plan includes
provisions for workforce housing and housing for persons with special physical needs.
(i) a descrip on of your Company’s background, customers, goods and services and the principal
products to be produced and/or the principal ac vi es that will occur on the Project site;
Twin Ponds HB, LLC is a single purpose en ty created to own and manage the mixed-use and
residen al development on the proposed site.
(ii) Size of project
- Mul Family Dwellings – 469,970 SF
o 87,460 SF of Covered Parking
o 369,240 Common Areas and Dwelling
- Club House – 5,400 SF
- Mixed Use Building – 16,880 SF
o Retail / Office 5,700 SF
o Dwelling Units – 11,180 SF
Page 46 of 71
- Detached Garages - 13,270 SF
(iii) the size of the lot upon which the Project sits or is to be constructed;
The lot size is approximately 54.85 Acres
(iv) the current use of the site and the intended use of the site upon comple on of the Project;
The current property consists of vacant land which was previously used as a quarry and includes
one large pond and 3 Vacant Houses. The intended use of the property is as a mul -family
residen al complex containing 309 Residen al Units, associated support buildings such as
maintenance and tenant garages, a club house, below ground and surface parking and a small
retail/office component.
(v) describe your method for site control (Own, lease, other).
The applicant currently owns the property.
G) any compelling circumstances the agency should be aware of…
H.1.c Have any environmental issues been iden fied on the property?
A small petroleum spill was iden fied during the environmental review of the project. The
affected area is next to one of the exis ng structures and covers approximately 2,000 square
feet. The affected area will be remediated as part of the project.
Sec on VII: Four Housing Projects Only
NEW UTEP Ques ons
1. Describe the reasons why the Agency’s financial assistance is necessary. Describe how the project
would be impacted if these benefits were not provided. {Sec on II (D)}
Because of the current lending environment and increased construc on costs, the project will not
proceed without agency assistance. If the project is not provided assistance the amount of rent
necessary to meet the financial requirements will be well in excess of current market rates.
Consequently, we will be unable to secure the loan necessary to proceed.
2. Describe how the proposed housing project fulfills an unmet need in the community.
Twin Ponds fulfills an unmet need of market and workforce housing in the Eastern Suburbs. As
shown by the market study, there is currently very li le available supply.
3. Please provide a market study documen ng a need for the proposed project.
A Market study provided by Robert Smith is a ached.
Page 47 of 71
4. Describe how the proposed project aligns with the Plan Onondaga County comprehensive plan. (Plan
Onondaga)
One of the core objec ves of the County’s 2024 Comprehensive Plan is to support “affordable,
a rac ve and efficient housing and neighborhoods to retain and a ract future residents”.
We believe the development of the Twin Ponds housing complex directly aligns with this
objec ve. The Plan notes that since the Great Recession (2007-2009) there has been a shor all
in the construc on of single-family homes and a steeper decline in the development of “starter
homes”. It adds, “although there has been a subsequent increase in the number of apartment
units constructed over this same me period, there remains a shortage of units overall.”
Con nuing it states, “today’s housing needs have changed drama cally due in large part to
fewer households with children, few married households and an aging popula on overall. There
is an increasing demand for apartments and a ached units on small lots in more walkable
neighborhoods for example. Shi s in household size, makeup, lifestyle preference, declining
willingness or ability to own a home and available inventory have led to an increase in demand
for apartment units over detached owner-occupied homes.”
The project will create approximately 309 new apartment units on an unu lized, former quarry in
the Town of Manlius. The units will be comprised of one, two and three-bedroom apartments
offering wide flexibility for differing family types. Further the site is conveniently located in close
proximity to exis ng shopping, restaurants and a large medical complex allowing residents to
easily walk to these loca ons. In addi on to having access to a large pond allowing on site water
access the property is conveniently located alongside the Erie Canal Trailway path. These
characteris cs meet both the lifestyle and walkability goals for new projects outlined in the Plan.
We believe Twin Ponds meets the objec ves outlined in the Plan by simultaneously crea ng a
new housing op on and doing so in a manner consistent with the characteris cs described in the
Plan.
5. Is the Project considered infill in a populated area? If yes, please explain.
The project is located on an unu lized, former quarry, in the Town of Manlius and is the
quintessen al defini on of an infill project. Located near exis ng shopping, restaurants and a
large medical complex allowing. Infilling a large por on of land between various developments
along Burdick Street.
6. Is there addi onal infrastructure necessary to service the project? If yes, please explain.
There are no significant addi onal infrastructure requirements for the project to proceed. Sewer,
water, power and roads are all located adjacent to the property.
Page 48 of 71
7. Is the project a part of a larger mixed-use development? If yes, please describe.
No. It is a mul -family housing complex complimented by a small 5,700 sq. . commercial space.
Page 49 of 71
Full Environmental Assessment Form
Part 1 - Project and Setting
Instructions for Completing Part 1
Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,
are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification.
Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to
any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist,
or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to
update or fully develop that information.
Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A. Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Twin Ponds Residential Community Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): 5440 Burdick Street, Manlius NY Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): The proposed action is for the development of a Residential Community consisting of residential dwelling units, commercial/mixed use tenants, and recreational / open space areas. The development will include new residential and mixed use buildings, along with a clubhouse and amenity areas for recreation. The project will construct necessary driveways, parking areas, landscaping, and site utilities to serve the proposed development.
Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: 315-476-7917
Twin Ponds HB, LLC E-Mail: cbreuer@hb1872.build
Address: PO Box 515
City/PO: Syracuse State: Zip Code:
NY 13205-0515
Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone:
E-Mail:
Address:
City/PO: State: Zip Code:
Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone:
E-Mail:
Address:
City/PO: State: Zip Code:
Page 1 of 13
Page 50 of 71
B. Government Approvals
B. Government Approvals Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial
assistance.)
Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date
Required (Actual or projected)
a. City Town , Yes No Town Board - PUD District Plan Approved Nov 2023
or Village Board of Trustees
b. City, Town or Village Yes No Site Plan Review March 2024
Planning Board or Commission
c. City Town or Yes No
Village Zoning Board of Appeals
d. Other local agencies Yes No
e. County agencies Yes No OCIDA,SOCPA, OCDOT April 2024
f. Regional agencies Yes No
g. State agencies Yes No NYSDEC Stormwater Permit May 2024
h. Federal agencies Yes No
i. Coastal Resources.
i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? Yes No
ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? Yes No
iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? Yes No
C. Planning and Zoning
C.1. Planning and zoning actions.
Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the Yes No
only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed?
If Yes, complete sections C, F and G.
If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1
C.2. Adopted land use plans.
a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site Yes No
where the proposed action would be located?
If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action Yes No
would be located?
b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway Yes No
Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan;
or other?)
If Yes, identify the plan(s):
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, Yes No
or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan?
If Yes, identify the plan(s):
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 13
Page 51 of 71
C.3. Zoning
a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. Yes No
If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) District Plan - Twin Ponds PUD
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? Yes No
c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? Yes No
If Yes,
i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________
C.4. Existing community services.
a. In what school district is the project site located? Fayetteville-Manlius
________________________________________________________________
School District
b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Manlius Police Department
c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Manlius Fire Department
d. What parks serve the project site?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Town of Manlius Parks Department
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
D. Project Details
D.1. Proposed and Potential Development
a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all
components)? Residential and Mixed-Use (commercial)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? _____________
54 +/- acres
b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? _____________
16.7 +/- acres
c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned
or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _____________
54 +/- acres
c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? Yes No
i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units,
square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________
d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? Yes No
If Yes,
i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types)
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? Yes No
iii. Number of lots proposed? ________
iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________
Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? Yes No
If No, anticipated period of construction: _____
24 months
If Yes:
Total number of phases anticipated _____
Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year
Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year
Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may
determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 13
Page 52 of 71
f. Does the project include new residential uses? Yes No
If Yes, show numbers of units proposed.
One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more)
Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ 304 dwelling units
________________________
At completion
of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________
--
g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? Yes No
If Yes,
i. Total number of structures ___________ 2
ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height;
30 ________width;
60 and _______
130 length
iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________
minimum of 7,800 SF square feet
h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any Yes No
liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage?
If Yes,
i. Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________
ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: Ground water Surface water streams Other specify:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres
v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length
vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete):
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
D.2. Project Operations
a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? Yes No
(Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated
materials will remain onsite) *general site grading / excavations
If Yes:
i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________
ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site?
Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________
Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________
iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? Yes No
If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres
vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres
vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet
viii. Will the excavation require blasting? Yes No
ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment Yes No
into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area?
If Yes:
i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic
description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 13
Page 53 of 71
ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or
alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes No
If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________
iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? Yes No
If Yes:
a of vegetation proposed to be removed ___________________________________________________________
acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion ________________________________________
purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________
if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________
v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? Yes No
If Yes:
i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ 68,000 gallons/day
ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? Yes No
If Yes:
Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________
OCWA
Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? Yes No
Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No
Is expansion of the district needed? Yes No
Do existing lines serve the project site? Yes No
iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? Yes No
If Yes:
Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Extension of public water main to service the proposed buildings
Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________
OCWA
iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? Yes No
If, Yes:
Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________
Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________
Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________
v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute.
d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? Yes No
If Yes:
i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________
68,000 gallons/day
ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and
approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
residential sanitary wastewater
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? Yes No
If Yes:
Meadowbrook-Limestone
Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________
Name of district: Meadowbrook-Limestone
______________________________________________________________________________________
Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? Yes No
Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No
Is expansion of the district needed? Yes No
Page 5 of 13
Page 54 of 71
Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? Yes No
Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? Yes No
If Yes:
Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Public sewer extension from Meadowbrook-Limestone trunk sewer to service the proposed buildings
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? Yes No
If Yes:
Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________
Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________
What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________
v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed
receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans):
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point Yes No
sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point
source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction?
If Yes:
i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel?
_____ Square feet or _____ 9 acres (impervious surface)
_____ Square feet or _____ 54 acres (parcel size)
ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________
surface runoff from parking areas and roof areas
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties,
groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)?
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
on site stormwater management system and existing surface pond
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? Yes No
iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? Yes No
f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel Yes No
combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations?
If Yes, identify:
i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
none
ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers)
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
typical construction equipment including generators and temporary heating
iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation)
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
none
g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, Yes No
or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit?
If Yes:
i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet Yes No
ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year)
ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate:
___________Tons/year ( ) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
___________Tons/year ( ) of Nitrous Oxide (N2 )
___________Tons/year ( ) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
___________Tons/year ( ) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6)
___________Tons/year ( ) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflo rocarbons (H )
___________Tons/year ( ) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)
Page 6 of 13
Page 55 of 71
h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, Yes No
landfills, composting facilities)?
If Yes:
i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________
ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or
electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as Yes No
quarry or landfill operations?
If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust):
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial Yes No
new demand for transportation facilities or services?
If Yes:
i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): Morning Evening Weekend
Randomly between hours of __________
7am-9am to ________.
4pm-6pm
ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day
Parking spaces: Existing _____________
zero Proposed ___________
569 Net increase/decrease _____________
+ 569
v.
new site access off North Burdick Street with signal improvement.
vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? Yes No
vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric Yes No
or other alternative fueled vehicles?
viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing Yes No
pedestrian or bicycle routes?
k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand Yes No
for energy?
If Yes:
*residential mixed use project
i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or
other):
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade to an existing substation? Yes No
l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply.
i. During Construction: ii. During Operations:
Monday - Friday: _________________________
7am-7pm Monday - Friday: ____________________________
commercial businesses 7am-9pm
Saturday: ________________________________
--- Saturday: ___________________________________
commercial businesses 7am-9pm
Sunday: _________________________________
---- Sunday: ____________________________________
commercial businesses 7am-9pm
Holidays: ________________________________
----- Holidays: ___________________________________
-----
Page 7 of 13
Page 56 of 71
m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, Yes No
operation, or both?
If yes:
i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Typical construction equipment (loaders, truck, excavators) during construction hours 7am-7pm
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? Yes No
Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? Yes No
If yes:
i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
typical parking lot and building mounted area lighting
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? Yes No
Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? Yes No
If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest
occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum ( over 1,100 gallons) Yes No
or chemical products ?
If Yes:
Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year)
Generally describe proposed storage facilities ________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, Yes No
insecticides) during construction or operation?
If Yes: *Residential mixed use project
i. Describe proposed treatment(s):
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? Yes No
r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal Yes No
of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)?
If Yes: *Residential mixed use project
i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility:
Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time)
Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time)
ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste:
Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site:
Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 8 of 13
Page 57 of 71
s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? Yes No
If Yes:
i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or
other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________
ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing:
________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or
________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment
iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years
t. Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous Yes No
waste?
If Yes:
i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month
iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? Yes No
If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action
E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site
a. Existing land uses.
i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site.
Urban Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm)
Forest Agriculture Aquatic Other (specify): ____________________________________
ii. If mix of uses, generally describe:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commercial Fayetteville Towne Center, Medical Facility, and residential apartments
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site.
Land use or Current Acreage After Change
Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres +/-)
Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious
0.5 9.0 + 8.5
surfaces
Forested 0.0
Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non-
28.5 20 -8.5
agricultural, including abandoned agricultural)
Agricultural 0.0
(includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.)
Surface water features
25 25 0.0
(lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.)
Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) 0.0
Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) 0.0
Other
Describe: _______________________________
________________________________________
Page 9 of 13
Page 58 of 71
c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? Yes No
i. If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________
d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed Yes No
day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site?
If Yes,
i. Identify Facilities:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Northeast Medical Center, Towne Center Retirement Community
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? Yes No
If Yes:
i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment:
Dam height: _________________________________ feet
Dam length: _________________________________ feet
Surface area: _________________________________ acres
Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet
ii. Dam s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________
iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, Yes No
or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility?
If Yes:
i. Has the facility been formally closed? Yes No
If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________
ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin Yes No
property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste?
If Yes:
i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any Yes No
remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site?
If Yes:
i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site Yes No
Remediation database? Check all that apply:
Yes – Spills Incidents database 2108871 - spill closed
Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________
Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________
none
Neither database
ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? Yes No
If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________
iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s):
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Spill Incident 2108871. Gasoline spill due to equipment failure. Spill date is closed by NYSDEC on 9/19/2022
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 10 of 13
Page 59 of 71
v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? Yes No
If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________
Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________
Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________
Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________
Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? Yes No
Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site
a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________
40 feet
b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? Yes No
If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________%
c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________
Cazenovia Silt Loam __________%
5.0
___________________________
Gravel pit __________%
29.0
____________________________
surface water __________%
66.0
d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________
> 30ft feet
e. Drainage status of project site soils: Well Drained: _____%
100 of ite
Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site
Poorly Drained _____% of ite
f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 0-10%: _____%
75 of site
10-15%: _____%
15 of site
15% or greater: _____%
10 of site
g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? Yes No
If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
h. Surface water features.
i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, Yes No
ponds or lakes)?
ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? Yes No
If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i.
iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, Yes No
state or local agency?
iv. For each identified wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information
Streams: Name ____________________________________________
899-222 Classification _______________________
C
899-224.3 C
Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________
Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________
Federal waters, NYS wetlands Approximate Size ___________________
907 acres
Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________
SYE-22
v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired Yes No
waterbodies?
If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Limestone creek lower and minor tributaries - Pathogens, dissolved oxygen / oxygen demand, aesthetics.
i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? Yes No
j. Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? Yes No
k. Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? Yes No
l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? Yes No
If Yes:
i. Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 11 of 13
Page 60 of 71
m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________
______________________________
squirrels, deer, birds _______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________
n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? Yes No
If Yes:
i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________
iii. Extent of community/habitat:
Currently: ______________________ acres
Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres
Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres
o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as Yes No
endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species?
northern long-eared bat
p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of Yes No
special concern?
q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? Yes No
If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site
a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to Yes No
Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304?
If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________
b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? Yes No
i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________
ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________
c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National Yes No
Natural Landmark?
If Yes:
i. Nature of the natural landmark: Biological Community Geological Feature
ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? Yes No
If Yes:
i. CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________
ii. Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________
iii. Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________
Page 12 of 13
Page 61 of 71
e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district Yes No
which is listed on of Historic P
of Historic Places?
If Yes:
i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: Archaeological Site Historic Building or District
ii. Name: Eligible
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
property: Limestone Creek aqueduct & crossover bridge
iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Old Erie Canal State Historic Park listing related to Recreation, Landscape Architecture, and historic engineering features.
f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Yes No
archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory?
g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? Yes No
If Yes:
i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________
ii. Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________
h. the project site any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local Yes No
scenic or aesthetic resource?
If Yes:
i. Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________
Erie Canal Trail
ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway,
etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
State trail
iii. Distance between project and resource: _____________________ 0.5 miles.
i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers Yes No
Program 6 NYCRR 666?
If Yes:
i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________
ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? Yes No
F. Additional Information
Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project.
If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any
measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them.
G. Verification
I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________
CHA Consulting Inc (c/o Brian Bouchard) Date_______________________________________
3/25/24
Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________
Project Engineer
PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13
Page 62 of 71
Monday, July 31, 2023 3:07 PM
Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist
project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental
assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are
answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF
question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although
the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to
DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order
to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a
substitute for agency determinations.
B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No
B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No
C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Potential Contamination History] Workbook.
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Listed] Workbook.
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook.
E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation No
Site]
E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No
E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] Yes
E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes
E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and
waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream 899-222
Name]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream C
Classification]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - 899-224.3
Lake/Pond Name]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - C
Lake/Pond Classification]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands Federal Waters, NYS Wetland
Name]
Page 63 of 71 Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands NYS Wetland (in acres):892.6 Size] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - DEC SYE-22 Wetlands Number] E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] Yes E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies - Name and Name - Pollutants - Uses:Limestone Creek, Lower, and minor tribs Basis for Listing] Pathogens;D.O./Oxygen Demand;Aesthetics Recreation;Aquatic Life E.2.i. [Floodway] Yes E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] Yes E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] Yes E.2.l. [Aquifers] No E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] Yes E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species - Northern Long-eared Bat Name] E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Yes - Digital mapping data for archaeological site boundaries are not Places or State Eligible Sites] available. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.3.e.ii [National or State Register of Historic Eligible property:LIMESTONE CREEK AQUEDUCT & CROSSOVER BRIDGE Places or State Eligible Sites - Name] E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No
Page 64 of 71 Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 Page 65 of 71 Page 66 of 71 Page 67 of 71 The ongoing housing shortage in Onondaga County and the City of Syracuse impacts economic development significantly. Limited housing availability can stifle population growth, deter new businesses from expanding or locating here, and strain existing infrastructure. Rising housing costs may push residents to seek more affordable living outside the area, reducing the local labor pool. This shortage can also hinder efforts to attract and retain talent, essential for economic expansion and innovation. Addressing this challenge is crucial for sustainable economic development and community well-being throughout the county and the region . The author of this report, Robert Smith, is a Licensed New York State Real Estate Broker with 30 years experience in the Onondaga County housing market including residential resale, new construction, and development. In addition, Mr. Smith served for 15 years on the Town of Cicero Planning Board for many of those years as the board’s Chair. Mr. Smith is a Member of the Greater Syracuse Association of REALTORS®. Mr. Smith is a NYS Licensed Real Estate Instructor and owns a New York State Licensed Real Estate School in Syracuse, New York training real estate agents, brokers, appraisers, and assessors. His experience in the Onondaga County housing market and planning has afforded him a unique understanding of that housing market.
Showing the first 80 of 89 passages — read the complete text.