Machine-extracted (OCR) from the official document — formatting is approximate; the official copy governs.
335 MONTGOMERY STREET, FLOOR 2M, SYRACUSE, NY 13202
315.435.3770 • ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT@ONGOV.NET • ONGOVED.COM
Audit Committee Meeting Agenda
November 13, 2025
Call to Order the Audit Committee Meeting
A. Approval of Meeting Minutes: March 6, 2025
Action Items:
1. Preliminary Audit Review for Fiscal Year 2025
Representative: Michael G. Lisson, Grossman St. Amour CPAs
2. Audit Committee Charter
The Committee members will review the Committee’s Charter.
Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Committee to transmit the Committee Charter with/without comment to
the Governance Committee for review and recommendation to the Board.
Adjourn
Page 1 of 17
Audit Committee Meeting Minutes
March 6, 2025
An Audit Committee meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on
Thursday, March 6, 2025, at 335 Montgomery Street, Floor 2M, Syracuse, New York.
Janice Herzog called the meeting to order at 8:31 AM with the following in attendance:
PRESENT:
Janice Herzog
Patrick Hogan
ABSENT:
Cydney Johnson
ALSO PRESENT:
Robert M. Petrovich, Executive Director
Nate Stevens, Treasurer
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Robert Schoeneck, Assistant Treasurer
Amanda Fitzgerald, Esq., Counsel (via Zoom)
Mike Lisson, Auditor
Brianah Lane, Auditor
Gianna Quonce, Auditor
Approval of Meeting Minutes: October 10, 2024
Upon motion by Patrick Hogan, seconded by Janice Herzog, the meeting minutes of October 10,
2024 were approved. Motion was carried.
Action Items:
1. 2024 Agency Audit
Review and discuss the 2024 Audit of the Agency. Determine a recommendation to be made
to the Agency Board.
Mike Lisson presented a summary of the 2024 audit and noted the activity of the Agency. He
stated that everything went extremely well and there were no significant issues to note.
Page 2 of 17
Janice Herzog read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Committee’s
recommendation to the Agency Board regarding the 2024 Audit of the Agency.” Motion was
made by Patrick Hogan, seconded by Janice Herzog. Motion was carried.
Motion to adjourn was made by Patrick Hogan and seconded by Janice Herzog at 8:36 AM.
___________________________________
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Page 3 of 17
Auditor’s Communication with Those
Charged with Governance during planning
October 23, 2025
Mike Lisson, CPA, CFE Partner
Bri Lane, CPA Supervisor
110 West Fayette Street, Suite 900
Syracuse, New York 13202 1
Page 4 of 17
315.424.1120 • www.gsacpas.com
AGENDA
PROFESSIONAL STAFF
RESPONSIBILITIES
PLANNED SCOPE
WHAT’S GOING ON IN THE ACCOUNTING AND REGULATORY
WORLD
Page 5 of 17
PROFESSIONAL STAFF
Audit Partners ‐ Mike Lisson, CPA, CITP & Mark Ciaralli, CPA, CFE
Mark is the lead partner and is responsible for reviewing the audit. PAAA
requires a change in partner once every 5 years (we rotated partners in
2021)
In addition, due to governmental auditing standards, we assign two
partners to all of our governmental audits
Contact Information:
Mike (315) 701‐6430 / Mark (315)‐701‐6391
mlisson@gsacpas.com / mciaralli@gsacpas.com
• All staff assigned need to possess adequate professional competence
All professionals must complete at least 80 hours of CPE to enhance
professional proficiency and at least 24 hours must be specific to governmental
areas every two years related to the audit
Brianah Lane (Bri) – supervisor, will continue on the audit this year and has
been working on the audit for 5+ years
3
Page 6 of 17
AUDITOR’s RESPONSIBILITIES
Communicated through engagement letter
We are responsible for conducting our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America (AICPA); with government auditing standards
(GAGAS); and the New York State Authorities Budget Office (ABO)
We form and express an opinion over the financial statements prepared by management, with
your oversight, about whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects,
with GAAP (GASB). You have the ultimate responsibility for these financial statements.
As a component unit of Onondaga County, your financial information is included in the
County’s financials. The County’s independent auditors do not take responsibility for the
financial information as they reference other auditors (GSA CPAs) in accordance with
professional standards.
4
Page 7 of 17
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due
to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain
audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of OCIDA’s internal control.
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant
accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the
financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent
the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
Conclude, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether there are conditions or events,
considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt of OCIDA’s ability to continue as a
going concern for a reasonable period of time.
5
Page 8 of 17
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES
Communicated through engagement letter
Preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements with GAAP
Design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation
and fair presentation of financial statements from material misstatement from:
Errors
Fraudulent financial reporting
Misappropriation of assets
Violations of laws, governmental regulations, grant agreements or contractual agreements
Provide unrestricted access to all records, documentation and persons necessary to obtain
audit evidence
Identifying and ensuring compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the entity’s
activities
For adjusting financial statements to correct material misstatements and confirming to us
in the management representation letter that uncorrected misstatements are immaterial,
both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements as a whole
For acceptance of nonattest services, including identifying the proper party to oversee
nonattest work
For maintaining adequate records, selecting and applying accounting principles, and
safeguarding assets
For the accuracy and completeness of all information provided
6
Page 9 of 17
PLANNED SCOPE
Audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; therefore, our
audit will involve judgment about the number of transactions to be
examined and the areas to be tested.
Our audit is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute,
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement, whether due to error, fraudulent financial reporting,
misappropriation of assets, or violations of laws or governmental
regulations.
There is always a risk that material misstatements may exist that may
not be detected by us.
7
Page 10 of 17
PLANNED SCOPE (continued)
We are required to obtain an understanding of your entity and its environment, including internal
controls, to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and as a basis for
designing the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures.
Our audit is not designed to express an opinion or provide assurance on internal control over financial
reporting or compliance with provisions of applicable laws, regulations, contracts, and agreements.
Although we don’t express opinions over these, we will communicate our scope and results of that
testing through a separate communication, titled: “Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance
with Governmental Auditing Standards”
Identification of significant risks
Revenue recognition – Agency fees, most significant to date – Upstate Pathology Lab Ownership
LLC, $1.1M Semiconductor Components Industries $1.5, White Pines Agency fees $1.1M
Investment in real property
A significant risk for our audit purposes are risks relating to amounts or disclosures in the financial
statements that require special audit consideration because of the likelihood and magnitude of the
potential misstatement. We consider certain factors to determine whether a risk is a significant risk.
8
Page 11 of 17
WHAT’S GOING ON IN THE
ACCOUNTING & REGULATORY WORLD
Accounting / Auditing
Auditing
Audit Standards (AICPA / GAGAS)
SAS 149, Special considerations – audits of group financial statements (including
the work of component auditors and audits of referred‐to auditors) (applicable for
fiscal ‘26)
Governmental Accounting Standards (GASB)
Risks and uncertainties disclosures issued December 23 (applicable for fiscal ‘25)
Numerous ongoing GASB projects may impact OCIDA in future years
Financial reporting model issued April ‘24 (applicable for fiscal ‘26)
Revenue and expense recognition – exposure draft
Accounting and financial reporting for subsequent events – exposure draft
9
Page 12 of 17
WHAT’S GOING ON IN THE ACCOUNTING &
REGULATORY WORLD (continued)
Regulatory
I) NYS Comptroller
No new audit reports issued since July 2022.
OCIDA’s last audit (project approval and monitoring) from OSC was November
2019
II) Authorities Budget Office (ABO)
New policy guidance regulation 25‐01 issued 3/5/25, Freedom of Information Law
(FOIL) and Open Meetings Law (OML) Requirements
10
Page 13 of 17
Page 14 of 17
Page 15 of 17
Page 16 of 17
Page 17 of 17