Machine-extracted (OCR) from the official document — formatting is approximate; the official copy governs.
335 MONTGOMERY STREET, FLOOR 2M, SYRACUSE, NY 13202
315.435.3770 • ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT@ONGOV.NET • ONGOVED.COM
Regular Meeting Agenda
December 11, 2025
Call to Order the Regular Meeting of the Agency
A. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes: November 13, 2025
B. Approval of Special Meeting Minutes: November 18, 2025
C. Treasurer’s Report
D. Payment of Bills
E. Conflict of Interest
Action Items:
1. Cameron Hinsdale, LLC (Project #3101-25-05A)
The applicant is proposing to construct a mixed-use residential building/s consisting of roughly
180 units and a total of roughly 50,000 sq. ft. of commercial space in the Town of Camillus.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing a public hearing.
Representative: Joe Goethe
2. Committee Appointments
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board appointing Elizabeth Dreyfuss to the Governance Committee.
3. Bid Award: White Pine Commerce Park Demolition
The Agency is proposing to accept the bid of a Company to complete site clearance
services of vacant Agency owned structures at White Pine Commerce Park.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing the Executive Director to accept a bid and enter into
one or more agreements for site clearance services with a Company for site clearance
services at White Pine Commerce Park.
Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director
Page 1 of 66
4. National Grid – Easement Authorization
The Agency wishes to grant an easement to National Grid over portions of lands owned by the
Agency for the purpose of facilities to provide electric and gas services.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing the execution of an easement in connection with
property located at 5064 State Route 31 for facilities to provide electric and gas services.
Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director
5. Onondaga County Water District – Easement Authorization
The Agency wishes to grant an easement to the Onondaga County Water District over portions
of lands owned by the Agency for the purpose of constructing and maintaining pipelines for the
distribution of water.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing the execution of an easement in connection with
property located on the easterly side of Caughdenoy Road for the purpose of
constructing and maintaining pipelines for the distribution of water.
Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director
6. Discovery Center of Science and Technology – Easement Authorization
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing execution of an easement agreement and any related
documents in connection with the granting of a non-exclusive easement to the City of
Syracuse.
Representative: Amanda Fitzgerald, Agency Counsel
7. EDPL – SSO Properties
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the board adopting the New York Eminent Domain Procedure Law 204
Determination and Findings Regarding Potential Acquisition of Property Interest by
purchase or eminent domain and related actions for the Micron New York
Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC Project.
Representatives: Jeffrey Davis & Mark McNamara, Agency Counsel
Page 2 of 66
8. PSL of Fayetteville LLC & Fayetteville MC Owner (3101-22-09A) Modification Meeting
PSL of Fayetteville LLC & Fayetteville MC Owner are requesting an increase to their mortgage
recording tax exemption amount from $92,326 to $115,500.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing an increase of the mortgage recording tax exemption
for PSL of Fayetteville LLC & Fayetteville MC Owner.
Representative: Amanda Fitzgerald, Agency Counsel
9. Executive Session
10. Litigation Settlement Agreement
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing the adoption of a SEQRA determination for the
acquisition of property.
b. A resolution of the Board authorizing execution and delivery of a settlement agreement
which includes termination of an Occupancy Agreement and acquisition of lands on
Caughdenoy Road designated as Tax Map No. 047.-01-14.4.
Representative: Jeffrey Davis, Agency Counsel
Adjourn
Page 3 of 66
Regular Meeting Minutes
November 13, 2025
A Regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Thursday,
November 13, 2025, at 335 Montgomery Street, Floor 2M, Syracuse, New York.
Patrick Hogan called the meeting to order at 8:30 AM with the following in attendance:
PRESENT:
Patrick Hogan
Susan Stanczyk
Elizabeth Dreyfuss
Cydney Johnson
Leslie English
ABSENT:
Fanny Villarreal
Garard Grannell
ALSO PRESENT:
Robert M. Petrovich, Executive Director
Nate Stevens, Treasurer
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Robert Schoeneck, Assistant Treasurer
Evan Carter, Assistant Secretary
Jeffrey Davis, Esq., Agency Counsel
Amanda Fitzgerald, Esq., Agency Counsel
Sarah Spencer, Esq., Agency Counsel
Joe Goethe, Cameron Hinsdale, LLC
Approval of Meeting Minutes: October 23, 2025
Upon motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, the Board approved the Regular
meeting minutes of October 23, 2025. Motion was carried.
Approval of Meeting Minutes: November 7, 2025
Upon motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Cydney Johnson, the Board approved the Special
meeting minutes of November 7, 2025. Motion was carried.
Page 4 of 66
Treasurer’s Report:
Nate Stevens gave a brief overview of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of October 2025.
Upon motion by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, seconded by Cydney Johnson, the Board approved the
Treasurer’s Report. Motion was carried.
Payment of Bills:
Nate Stevens gave a brief overview of the Payment of Bills.
Upon motion by Leslie English, seconded by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, the Board approved the Payment of
Bills. Motion was carried.
Action Items:
1. Cameron Hinsdale, LLC (Project #3101-25-05A)
The applicant is proposing to construct a mixed-use residential building/s consisting of
roughly 175 units and a total of roughly 50,000 sq. ft. of commercial space in the Town of
Camillus.
Joe Goethe explained that the Applicant is proposing a mixed-use project, directly across the
street from Township 5 on Hinsdale Road. He noted that the project aligns with Plan
Onondaga, as well as the pro-housing community of Camillus.
J. Goethe noted that the project is receiving a PUD (planned unit development) for the project
to make it mixed-use, which fits into the comprehensive plan of Camillus. The project is
taking place on 20 acres, mostly owned by the Christ Community Church of the Nazarene,
which is currently religiously exempt from property taxes. The five parcels directly across
from Township 5 on Hinsdale Road will also be part of the proposed project and PUD.
J. Goethe noted that the original project was approximately 170 multi-family apartments
consisting of 30-35 townhouses, and one- or two-bedroom apartments. The project has now
increased the units from 170 to 232 and the retail component has been reduced.
J. Goethe noted that the Applicant has increased the number of workforce units to 46 (20%).
J. Goethe advised that they will be putting in a town road, off-site infrastructure, an
interchange in between Township 5 and this project, and pedestrian walkways, to ensure that
the project aligns with Plan Onondaga’s identification of an emerging center.
Page 5 of 66
J. Goethe explained to the Board that they’re looking for a negative declaration to move forward with the PUD. The Town (of Camillus) is going to take an action and has had public hearings at the last three meetings. The Town plans on closing the public hearing and making this a PUD zone change on November 25th and will recommend it back to the planning board for planning discussions. J. Goethe noted that there were few issues received from Agency letters. J. Goethe noted that County DOT (Marty Voss) provided a response on November 12. J. Goethe noted that Gordon Stansbury has done a traffic study and advised that the change in the scope from 170 units to 232 units will improve the overall traffic issues because it will reduce it due to the commercial aspect of the project. Susan Stanczyk asked if the 20 acres being acquired from the church, that are currently tax exempt, will eventually go back on the tax rolls. J. Goethe responded yes. S. Stanczyk inquired how much of the units are workforce housing. J. Goethe responded that there will be 20% workforce housing. S. Stanczyk asked if the retail portion has been reduced since the original plan. J. Goethe confirmed that the retail portion of the project has been reduced. Patrick Hogan asked if the AMI for the workforce housing is 80%. J. Goethe confirmed that the AMI is 80%.
R. Petrovich noted to the Board that the action put forth today is for SEQR. The Agency
staff is currently vetting the application and there is no proposal that has been put forward yet
for any incentives.
Sarah Spencer advised that her team at Bond Schoeneck & King was tasked with the
environmental review for this project.
S. Spencer advised that no other Agency can take action on the project until the SEQR
review is complete.
S. Spencer noted that the Agency received an application in August 2025 and determined that
a coordinated review must be conducted. At the September 11 meeting, the Agency adopted
Page 6 of 66
a resolution with its intent to serve as lead Agency, preliminarily classifying the project as a
Type I action under SEQR. Following that meeting, Bond Schoeneck & King sent
coordination letters to all potentially involved and interested agencies, requesting comment,
sharing the project details, and Part I of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). The
agencies had 30 days to respond with comments, consent for the Agency to act as lead
Agency, or opposition to that role.
S. Spencer noted that the Agency received letters from NYS DOT and Onondaga County
DOT, Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Office of Parks and Recreation
and Historic Preservation, and Onondaga County Department of Water and Environmental
Protection (WEP).
S. Spencer noted at the October 23 meeting, the Agency officially classified the project as a Type I action under SEQR. After that meeting, the project was revised slightly to include the two additional parcels on Hinsdale Road. After receiving this revision, Bond Schoeneck & King sent updated letters to the potentially involved and interested agencies with the updated concept plan, requesting additional comments. The Agency did not receive any additional comments on that change. S. Spencer noted as the Applicant previously stated, the project scope was revised to include additional residential units and fewer retail buildings. S. Spencer stated that they do not believe that this change has an impact on the project in terms of Agency coordination because the footprint of the project will remain essentially the same, and they did update the analysis to look at things like traffic, the issues that were important in their original analysis, and how the residential change will impact those environmental concerns. S. Spencer noted that the application was reviewed with the Applicant when it was first received. They requested updates to Part I of the EAF and to clarify items or request additional details. Counsel and the Agency met with the Applicant on multiple occasions to discuss the project and request additional information. Counsel and the Agency have also spoke with the Town Attorney about their review process.
S. Spencer advised that they have also coordinated with other agencies via email, letter, and
phone calls. They have reviewed the minutes from the Town’s public hearing and there were
very few comments, all of which were minor.
S. Spencer advised that the Agency is not required to hold a public hearing for SEQR on this
project because there is no EIS (Environmental Impact Statement).
S. Spencer noted that they also reviewed Onondaga County’s Planning Department
recommendations that were issued to the Town as part of their zone change application
process and there was nothing concerning in those recommendations that won’t be accounted
Page 7 of 66
for in the remaining review process. They reviewed the various comprehensive plans:
Onondaga County’s Housing, Plan Onondaga, Town of Camillus Comprehensive Plan,
Metropolitan Transportation Council’s Plan, the bus system routes, public transport to the
project site, the NYS Energy Plan, and disadvantaged community mapping, which is now
required under the environmental review process.
S. Spencer advised that the next steps for the Agency is to review and complete Part II of the
EAF, which takes Part I and all of the due diligence that the Agency has done and classifies
each environmental impact as small or no impact, or moderate or large impact.
S. Spencer noted that they identified 3 potentially moderate impacts. One was to traffic due to the size of the development and the need for updated infrastructure surrounding the site. The second was for energy use, because the number of units and the square footage that will be heated and cooled as part of the project. The third was impacts to community resources such as schools, fire, or police. Those are noted on Part II of the EAF. S. Spencer asked if any Board members had any questions on Part II of the EAF that they would like to discuss. No questions were raised. S. Spencer noted that Part III of the EAF is the analysis document. It was noted that there were a few changes made to the document, based on the letter that the Agency received the day prior from Onondaga County Department of Water Environment and Protection, relating to the sewer facilities at the site. S. Spencer explained that this analysis goes through each of the impacts. Whether or they noted that they would be small or moderate, they analyzed all of them the same way to be thorough. The document discusses the impacts and the process thus far and is a very thorough explanation of the review the Agency has done. S. Spencer advised that they ultimately concluded that there will be no adverse environmental impacts from the project and recommended adopting a negative declaration. R. Petrovich questioned S. Spencer if that recommendation and conclusion includes the updated comments from WEP.
S. Spencer responded yes. She also noted that the Agency has a record of all of the
documents compiled, which include the Agency responses, and all the various plans that have
been reviewed supporting the determination today.
Page 8 of 66
Patrick Hogan read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board issuing a negative
declaration under SEQRA.” Motion was made by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Elizabeth
Dreyfuss. Motion was carried.
2. Public Relations/Marketing Services – Contract Authorization
R. Petrovich advised that the Agency is currently under contract with ABC Creative Group,
who has been providing support services in terms of marketing, public relations, and other
support to the Agency, relative to the projects that are being put forward and initiatives that
are being executed by the Agency, specifically relating to Micron, supply chain, and other
projects of substance.
R. Petrovich advised that for planning purposes the existing contract with ABC should be
increased by $70,000 for the rest of 2025 and all of 2026 for those types of support services.
Patrick Hogan read the Agency action requested of, “A resolution of the Board increasing the
contract with ABC Creative Marketing Group in an amount not to exceed $70,000 for public
relations/marketing services to communicate the Agency’s objectives.” Motion was made by
Elizabeth Dreyfuss, seconded by Cydney Johnson. Motion was carried.
3. Lease Agreement Authorization
The Onondaga County Department of Water Environment Protection is requesting to lease
and eventually purchase a portion of property located at 5064 State Route 31 in the Town of
Clay, owned by the Agency to undertake certain activities consistent with its Oak Orchard
municipal sewer expansion project.
R. Petrovich recalled for the Board that the Agency owns property at the corner of
Caughdenoy Road and Route 31, south of that intersection and east of that intersection. In
support of development that will occur in that area, WEP has initiated a pump station project
to provide sewers not only for the Micron campus, but others in the immediate service area.
That project is underway. This is to ultimately “carve out” a portion approximately 1.13
acres of that land that WEP will own and be transferred from the Agency to WEP, so that
they can maintain their facility in the future and provide sewer services to the immediate
area.
R. Petrovich advised that there is an appraisal supporting the value of the land, and WEP has
been made aware of the cost. It is a 15-year lease. The total dollar amount is approximately
$190,000 over that 15-year period. If at any time WEP chooses to execute on the lease to
own it, they can exercise the option to acquire the property from the IDA.
Page 9 of 66
Patrick Hogan read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board authorizing the
lease and sale of property located at 5064 State Route 31 in the Town of Clay to the
Onondaga County Department of Water Environment Protection in connection with the
development of land in the Town of Clay, and execution of documents in connection
therewith, subject to compliance with the Public Authorities Law requirements.” Motion was
made by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Leslie English. Cydney Johnson abstained. Motion
was carried.
4. Committee Appointments
Patrick Hogan read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board appointing Leslie
English to the Audit Committee.” Motion was made by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Cydney
Johnson. Motion was carried.
Patrick Hogan read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board appointing Patrick
Hogan as Chair of the Audit Committee.” Motion was made by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by
Cydney Johnson. Motion was carried.
Motion to adjourn was made by Susan Stanczyk and seconded by Elizabeth Dreyfuss at 8:50 AM.
___________________________________
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Page 10 of 66
Special Meeting Minutes
November 18, 2025
A Special meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Tuesday,
November 18, 2025, at 401 Montgomery Street, Room #407, Syracuse, New York.
Patrick Hogan called the meeting to order at 9:38 AM with the following in attendance:
PRESENT:
Patrick Hogan
Elizabeth Dreyfuss
Leslie English
Fanny Villarreal
Cydney Johnson
ABSENT:
Susan Stanczyk
Garard Grannell
ALSO PRESENT:
Robert Petrovich, Executive Director
Nate Stevens, Treasurer
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Robert Schoeneck, Assistant Treasurer
Evan Carter, Assistant Secretary
Jeffrey Davis, Esq., Agency Counsel
Amanda Fitzgerald, Esq., Agency Counsel
Prior to addressing the agenda at hand, Patrick Hogan wanted to thank the County Legislature and
County Legislative Chairman, Tim Burtis, for allowing the Agency to use the Chambers. He also
welcomed County Legislator-Elect, Chad Ryan, and County Legislator Charles Garland.
Action Items:
1. Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC
Robert Petrovich read the following remarks to be put into the record:
The resolution before the Board today marks the conclusion of the Agency's more than two-
year review of the proposed Micron project under the State Environmental Quality Review
Act, known as SEQRA. On June 14, 2023, along with its application for financial assistance,
Page 11 of 66
Micron submitted to the Agency a full environmental assessment form, otherwise known as an EAF, in accordance with the mandates of SEQRA that commenced the environmental review of the proposed Micron project. The proposed Micron project includes, among other things, the acquisition of an interest in all or a portion of approximately 819 acres of land located at the westerly side of Burnet Road and the construction of two, approximately 1.2 million square foot memory fabrication facilities. Micron also proposes to construct a rail spur and construction material conveyance facility to reduce truck trips and support construction of the Micron campus, a childcare center, a healthcare center, and a recreation center to serve its employees, and to lease existing warehouse space within 20 miles of the Micron campus.
In order to ensure that the potential environmental impacts associated with the full build-out of the Micron campus were fully evaluated, Micron's EAF also covered both the project as described in Micron's application to the Agency, as well as the construction of all four fabs, the rail spur site, and childcare site. The Agency completed parts II and III of the EAF, declared itself lead agency, and on September the 14th, issued a positive declaration indicating the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS). From then on, the Agency spent the next two years evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Micron project, as well as various connected actions associated with the utility and infrastructure improvements necessary to meet the proposed Micron project's electricity, natural gas, water supply, wastewater, and telecommunications needs. As part of this process, the Agency worked closely with the CHIPS Program Office, as well as numerous SEQRA-involved and interested agencies, as well as various federal cooperating and participating agencies to prepare a Draft EIS and then the Final EIS that the Agency and the CHIPS program office separately adopted on November 7, 2025.
This process included multiple opportunities for the public to participate, both with respect to
identifying the topics to be studied in the EIS, and also on the contents of the Draft EIS. It
also included significant coordination and consultation with key federal and state agencies,
including the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation, New York State Department of Transportation,
and the New York State Office of Parks and Recreation and Historic Preservation. These
agencies actively participated in the environmental review of the proposed project and
offered their technical advice within the agency's areas of expertise.
Ultimately, the Final EIS identified both short-term construction-related activities and long-
term impacts associated with the preferred action alternative and the no action alternative.
Some impacts were determined not to be significant based on avoidance and minimization
Page 12 of 66
measures. These resource areas included, by way of example, geology, land use, air
emissions.
Other impacts were found to constitute a significant adverse impact. These included, for
example, greenhouse gas emissions, traffic, noise, and wetlands. For these resource areas,
mitigation measures were considered and identified to the maximum extent practicable.
Notwithstanding, as described in the Final EIS, the proposed Micron project will result in certain unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. These include, but are not limited to, (1) the permanent loss of approximately 193.38 acres of federal jurisdictional wetlands. Approximately 174.77 acres of which are state jurisdictional wetlands, and approximately 10.5 acres of non-jurisdictional wetlands, (2) the loss of most of the existing stream channels currently located in or on the Micron Campus site and the Rail Spur site, (3) the loss of certain ecological communities, (4) an increase in greenhouse gas emissions in the five- county area and New York State, (5) significant effects to traffic at certain intersections, and six, unmitigated traffic-related noise. Following the Agency's issuance of the Final EIS, agencies and the public were afforded a reasonable time period to consider the Final EIS. The Agency is now responsible for issuing its findings statement in accordance with SEQR.
As part of this analysis, the Agency held additional working group sessions to consider these environmental impacts as presented in the Final EIS, and the various social, economic, and other essential considerations for which to conduct the required balancing under SEQR. The Agency found that the preferred action alternative will complete the anticipated development of the White Pine Commerce Park, bringing its vision to reality and creating numerous benefits for state and local governments in the form of capstone developments that are regional destinations, increase tax revenue, and additional economic growth, as well as fulfilling a need for domestic semiconductor industry growth in the United States. The Agency also determined that the proposed Micron project will create new infrastructure in an industry and manufacturing facility of local, state, and national importance, investment in workforce development, hundreds of construction jobs, and thousands of permanent full- time positions, and increase sales tax revenue, and thereby advance the job opportunities, health, general prosperity, and economic welfare of the people of the County of Onondaga and the state of New York.
Presented with the foregoing, and following numerous workshop sessions over the last two
and a half years, and taking into account public comments and the input of numerous
stakeholders and federal and state agencies with relevant expertise, the Agency carefully and
diligently considered the preferred action alternative and other reasonable alternatives
available, and has considered in detail the social, economic, fiscal, land use, and other
Page 13 of 66
relevant factors as well as the reasonably anticipated environmental impacts and measures to
avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts of the preferred action alternative, and reasonable
alternatives available. The Agency also has weighed and balanced all relevant environmental
impacts with appropriate social, economic, and other considerations.
The resolution before the Agency, adopting the finding statement, would therefore select the preferred action alternative for construction and operation of the Micron Semiconductor Manufacturing Project. The resolution would further certify that the preferred action alternative is the alternative that, consistent with social, economic, and other essential considerations, avoids or minimizes potential significant adverse environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable, and that such impacts will be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating as conditions, those mitigating measures that are identified in the Final EIS as practicable. Patrick Hogan read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board approving the issuance of a findings statement pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC Project.” Motion was made by Fanny Villarreal, seconded by Elizabeth Dreyfuss. Motion was carried. 2. Property Disposition Authorization The Agency desires to lease and/or sell all or a portion of approximately 819.92 acres of real property located on Burnet Road, Caughdenoy Road and State Route 31 commonly referred to as the White Pine Commerce Park in the Town of Clay, Onondaga County, New York to Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC for a sale price of $30 million.
R. Petrovich informed the Board that in order for Micron to advance this project, they need to
acquire this property, which has been part of the ongoing process to develop this project and
to allow for construction to begin. The Agency is seeking the Board’s approval to initiate the
process of the 90-day notice and effect the Agency’s Property Disposition Policy in support
of this project.
Patrick Hogan read the Agency Action Requested of “A resolution of the Board authorizing
the lease and/or sale of all or a portion of approximately 819.92 acres of real property located
on Burnet Road, Caughdenoy Road and State Route 31 commonly referred to as the White
Pine Commerce Park in the Town of Clay, Onondaga County, New York to Micron New
York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC, and execution of documents in connection
therewith, subject to compliance with the Public Authorities Law requirements.” Motion was
made by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, seconded by Leslie English. Motion was carried.
Page 14 of 66
3. Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC (Project #3101-23-07A) Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC is proposing to construct and operate two large-scale, state-of-the-art dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) semiconductor manufacturing facilities at the White Pine Commerce Park in the Town of Clay. Each fab will occupy approximately 1.2 million sq. ft. of land and contain approximately 600,000 sq. ft. of semiconductor cleanroom manufacturing space. The fabs will be supported by central utility buildings, warehouse space, and product testing space. Amanda Fitzgerald advised that the PILOT being considered is a deviation from the Agency's Uniform Tax Exemption Policy. She offered to any representatives from the affected Town, County, or School District who were present at the meeting to address the Board regarding such proposed deviation from the Uniform Tax Exemption Policy. There were none. Alexis Rodriguez stated that OCIDA held a public hearing on November 6, 2025, regarding the financial assistance requested for the project. At the hearing, (22) public comments were made. (6) comments were opposed to the financial assistance requested, (6) comments were in favor of the financial assistance requested, and (10) general comments were made.
A. Rodriguez noted that the North Syracuse Central School District spoke in favor of the financial assistance requested and provided clarification as to how the PILOT would impact the taxpayers and the budget of the School District. A. Rodriguez stated that the recording of the public hearing was sent to the members of the Board within 24 hours after the hearing was conducted and it was also posted on the Agency’s website for public viewing within that timeframe. Patrick Hogan read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and sales and use taxes.” Motion was made by Fanny Villarreal, seconded by Elizabeth Dreyfuss. Motion was carried. 4. Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC (Rail Spur) (Project #3101-25- 06A) Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC is proposing to construct a rail spur and construction material conveyance facility on approximately 38 acres west of 8625 Caughdenoy Road in the Town of Clay to economically transport fill and other aggregate construction material to the Micron Campus by rail. Alexis Rodriguez stated that OCIDA held a public hearing on November 6, 2025, regarding the financial assistance requested for the project. At the hearing (8) public comments were
Page 15 of 66
made. (2) comments were opposed to the financial assistance requested, (3) comments were
in favor of the financial assistance requested, and (3) general comments were made.
A. Rodriguez stated that the recording of the public hearing was sent to the members of the
Board within 24 hours after the hearing was conducted and it was also posted on the
Agency’s website for public viewing within that timeframe.
Patrick Hogan read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board authorizing the
financial assistance the Agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions
from certain real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and sales and use taxes.” Motion
was made by Elizabeth Dreyfuss, seconded by Leslie English. Motion was carried.
5. Executive Session
Jeffrey Davis asked to go into executive session for the purpose of discussing pending
litigation.
Motion to enter into executive session was made by Fanny Villarreal, seconded by Elizabeth
Dreyfuss.
Motion to come out of executive session was by Fanny Villarreal, seconded by Cydney
Johnson.
Motion to adjourn was made by Elizabeth Dreyfuss and seconded by Cydney Johnson at 9:59 AM.
___________________________________
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Page 16 of 66
November 30, 2025
Revenue / Expense / Income Current Period Current YTD
Operating/Non-Op Revenue 148,056 4,782,900
Administrative Expense 53,750 624,234
Operating/Program Expense 14,037 1,794,597
Net Ordinary Income 80,269 2,364,069
Current Assets Current YTD
Total Cash 11,403,451
Less Pass Through Received
Net Cash 11,403,451
Page 17 of 66
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
Profit and Loss
November 2025
TOTAL Income 500 Operating Revenue 2116 Fees 2116.1 Agency Fees 2,500.00 2116.3 WPCP Agency Fee 111,111.11 Total 2116 Fees 113,611.11 2410 Lease Income 2,448.60 Total 500 Operating Revenue 116,059.71 501 Non-Operating Revenue 2401 Interest Income 31,996.26 Total 501 Non-Operating Revenue 31,996.26 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 528.003 OHB Redev LLC Funds Pass Thru 53,877.68 Total 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 53,877.68 550 WPCP Pass Thru Revenue 306,565.66 Total Income $508,499.31 GROSS PROFIT $508,499.31 Expenses 6400 Operating Expense 6401 Insurance 284.43 6406 Other Professional Services 6406.50 Consulting Services 3,000.00 Total 6406 Other Professional Services 3,000.00 6407 Administrative Expense 53,749.99 Total 6400 Operating Expense 57,034.42 6440 Legal Fees 6450 Barclay Damon 6460 IDA General Legal 1,275.00 6480 Roth Legal 37.50 Total 6450 Barclay Damon 1,312.50 Total 6440 Legal Fees 1,312.50 6500 Agency Program Expenses 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 6510.5 Insurance 5,090.00 Total 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 5,090.00 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 6530.3 Engineering 4,350.00 Total 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 4,350.00 Total 6500 Agency Program Expenses 9,440.00
Page 18 of 66
Accrual Basis Friday, December 5, 2025 08:04 AM GMT-05:00 1/2
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
Profit and Loss
November 2025
TOTAL
6514 White Pine Science & Technology Park
6514.4 Land 413,752.12
Total 6514 White Pine Science & Technology Park 413,752.12
6600 Non-Operating Expenses
6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses
6606 OHB Redev LLC Funds Pass Thru 53,877.68
Total 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 53,877.68
Total 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 53,877.68
Total Expenses $535,416.72
NET OPERATING INCOME $ -26,917.41
NET INCOME $ -26,917.41
Page 19 of 66
Accrual Basis Friday, December 5, 2025 08:04 AM GMT-05:00 2/2
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
Balance Sheet
As of November 30, 2025
TOTAL
ASSETS
Current Assets
Bank Accounts
200 Cash 0.00
200.5 NBT Checking 1,039,742.99
Total 200 Cash 1,039,742.99
200.6 NBT Savings 10,762,562.97
Total Bank Accounts $11,802,305.96
Accounts Receivable
380 Accounts Rec.
380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 1,320,837.67
Total 380 Accounts Rec. 1,320,837.67
Total Accounts Receivable $1,320,837.67
Other Current Assets
480 Prepaid Expenses
480.4 Credit Balance on Card -1,473.67
Total 480 Prepaid Expenses -1,473.67
Total Other Current Assets $ -1,473.67
Total Current Assets $13,121,669.96
Fixed Assets
100 Land
101 White Pines Commerce Park 0.00
101.3 Engineering Services 0.00
101.4 Environmental/Demo Services 110.00
Total 101.3 Engineering Services 110.00
Total 101 White Pines Commerce Park 110.00
105 3649 Erie Blvd East 4,589,296.64
107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42
108 White Pine Science & Technology Park 2,140,557.00
Total 100 Land 7,334,804.06
104 Machinery & Equipment
104.1 Office Furniture 2,076.11
104.2 Equipment 4,589.00
Total 104 Machinery & Equipment 6,665.11
211 A/D Office Furniture -6,018.00
250 Investment in Real Property 30,756,703.00
Total Fixed Assets $38,092,154.17
Page 20 of 66
Accrual Basis Friday, December 5, 2025 08:00 AM GMT-05:00 1/2
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
Balance Sheet
As of November 30, 2025
TOTAL
Other Assets
240 Blue Sky Redevelopment 1,641.76
Total Other Assets $1,641.76
TOTAL ASSETS $51,215,465.89
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable
300 WPCP Pass Thru Payable 790,909.10
Total Accounts Payable $790,909.10
Other Current Liabilities
600 Accounts Payable 0.00
600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 624,233.66
600.204 OHB Redev LLC Funds 398,855.20
600.209 Syracuse Rail Overpayment 500.00
600.3 Onondaga County Loan 28,079,656.77
600.31 Accrued Interest - OC Note Payable 3,095,059.00
Total 600.3 Onondaga County Loan 31,174,715.77
Total 600 Accounts Payable 32,198,304.63
Total Other Current Liabilities $32,198,304.63
Total Current Liabilities $32,989,213.73
Long-Term Liabilities
600.5 Onondaga County Loan - Non WPCP 4,574,298.64
Total Long-Term Liabilities $4,574,298.64
Total Liabilities $37,563,512.37
Equity
3900 Equity Unreserved 8,432,294.51
3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 2,345,838.63
463 Reserve For Contracts 368,811.84
465 Equity - Unreserved 4,017.16
Net Income 2,500,991.38
Total Equity $13,651,953.52
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $51,215,465.89
Page 21 of 66
Accrual Basis Friday, December 5, 2025 08:00 AM GMT-05:00 2/2
ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILLS - SCHEDULE #512 December 11, 2025
GENERAL EXPENSES
1. BARCLAY DAMON $ 177,777.78
October 2025 Legal Costs
2. JMT OF NEW YORK, LLP $ 128,787.88
October 2025 Engineering Costs
3. LOVELL & ASSOCIATES $ 3,000.00
November 2025 Consulting
4. JMT OF NEW YORK, LLP $ 3,286.00
Roth Steel, Inv #44-106591
5. BARTON & LOGUIDICE $ 19,836.64
Statement of Work 2023-5 -Inv #156354
6. BARCLAY DAMON $ 4,525.10
OHB Redev, Inv#5365367
7. BARCLAY DAMON $ 1,783.70
OHB Redev, Inv#5366683
8. BARCLAY DAMON $ 600.00
Retained Corporate & Public Finance Matters, Inv#5366684
9. BARCLAY DAMON $ 1,277.50
WPSTP Inv#5365368
10. AZALIA KING $ 450,000.00
Termination of Occupancy Agreement
11. BARCLAY DAMON $ 2,535,251.05
Purchase of Tax Parcel #047.-01-14.4
12. OHB REDEV $ 392,546.40
Return of Applicant Escrow Payment
Page 22 of 66
13. OHB REDEV $ 1,000,000.00
IP Reimbursement
14. NAFTZ $ 1,250.00
Annual Membership, Inv#5423
15. ROBERT PETROVICH $ 221.12
Mileage reimbursement
16. ASSOCIATED REPORTERS INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED $ 1,293.00
11/6/2025 Public Hearing Recordings
17. ONONDAGA CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION $ 600.47
Toshiba Reimbursement, Inv#1187
Total: $ 4,722,036.64
Page 23 of 66
12/10/2025
Project: Cameron Hinsdale, LLC Project Number: 3101-25-05-A
Location: Camillus School District: West Genesee
Project Type: New Construction
017.-04-08.1, 017.-04-09.0, 017.-04-10.0, 017.-04-048.1, Village: N/A
Tax Parcel(s):
017.-04-05.0, 017.-04-06.0
Total Project Cost: $ 52,208,912 8. Total Jobs 25 Land Acquisition $ 1,800,000 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work/Demo $ 7,437,696 8B: Job Creation 25 Building Construction & Renovation $ 35,101,343 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ - Project Soft Cost $ 7,869,873
Community Investment /Abatement Project Description
Fiscal Impact ($)
Abatement Summary $6,751,285
Sales Tax Abatement $2,400,000
Mortgage Tax Abatement $375,000
Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $3,976,285
The applicant is proposing to construct a mixed-use residential building/s consisting of
Community Investment $73,092,438 50,000 sq. ft. of commercial space and 155,000 sq. ft. of multi-family residential units
PILOT Payments $4,478,651 in the Town of Camillus.
Project Salaries and Benefits Estimated (10 yrs) $11,507,750
Construction Benefit Estimate $4,897,125
Total Project Cost $52,208,912
Investment:Abatement Ratio 10.83 :1
© 2025 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency. All rights reserved.
Page 24 of 66
Cameron Hinsdale, LLC
A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet
for 15 years
OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 1,146,000
Projected investment $ 35,101,343
OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 17,338,000
OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 18,484,000
Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 524,202
Scheduled PILOT payments $ 4,478,651
Full Tax
County PILOT School
PILOT YEAR Exemption % Town Village Total PILOT Payment w/o Net Exemption
Amount District
PILOT
$ 1,990.62 $ 3,195.18 $ 10,331.26 $ 15,517.06
1 100% $ 3,889 $ 6,242 $ 20,182 $ - $ 30,312.25 $ 488,911 $ 458,598
2 100% $ 3,966 $ 6,367 $ 20,586 $ - $ 30,918.50 $ 498,689 $ 467,770
3 100% $ 4,046 $ 6,494 $ 20,997 $ - $ 31,536.87 $ 508,663 $ 477,126
4 90% $ 10,370 $ 16,645 $ 53,820 $ - $ 80,834.44 $ 518,836 $ 438,001
5 80% $ 16,946 $ 27,199 $ 87,946 $ - $ 132,091.30 $ 529,213 $ 397,121
6 70% $ 23,780 $ 38,169 $ 123,417 $ - $ 185,366.09 $ 539,797 $ 354,431
7 60% $ 30,881 $ 49,567 $ 160,271 $ - $ 240,719.05 $ 550,593 $ 309,874
8 50% $ 38,257 $ 61,406 $ 198,550 $ - $ 298,211.98 $ 561,605 $ 263,393
9 40% $ 45,915 $ 73,698 $ 238,295 $ - $ 357,908.33 $ 572,837 $ 214,928
10 30% $ 53,864 $ 86,458 $ 279,552 $ - $ 419,873.26 $ 584,294 $ 164,420
11 25% $ 58,527 $ 93,942 $ 303,753 $ - $ 456,222.17 $ 595,979 $ 139,757
12 20% $ 63,355 $ 101,692 $ 328,810 $ - $ 493,857.09 $ 607,899 $ 114,042
13 15% $ 68,353 $ 109,714 $ 354,748 $ - $ 532,814.92 $ 620,057 $ 87,242
14 10% $ 73,525 $ 118,016 $ 381,592 $ - $ 573,133.51 $ 632,458 $ 59,325
15 5% $ 78,877 $ 126,606 $ 409,368 $ - $ 614,851.73 $ 645,107 $ 30,256
TOTAL $ 574,550 $ 922,216 $ 2,981,886 $ - $ 4,478,651 $ 8,454,936 $ 3,976,285
Year
0 1 2 3 4 5
Jobs
Current/Actuals
Creation Goals 10 10 5
Total
Employment
Goals 0 0 10 20 25 25
Page 25 of 66
Page 26 of 66
Page 27 of 66
Page 28 of 66
Page 29 of 66
Page 30 of 66
Page 31 of 66
Page 32 of 66
Page 33 of 66
Page 34 of 66
Page 35 of 66
Page 36 of 66
Page 37 of 66
Page 38 of 66
Page 39 of 66
Page 40 of 66
Page 41 of 66
Page 42 of 66
Page 43 of 66
Page 44 of 66
Page 45 of 66
Page 46 of 66
Page 47 of 66
Page 48 of 66
Page 49 of 66
Page 50 of 66
Page 51 of 66
Page 52 of 66
Page 53 of 66
Page 54 of 66
Page 55 of 66
Page 56 of 66
Page 57 of 66
Page 58 of 66
Page 59 of 66
Page 60 of 66
Page 61 of 66
Page 62 of 66
Page 63 of 66
Page 64 of 66
Page 65 of 66
Page 66 of 66