Typeset from the PDF of the official document (read by OCR) — headings, motions and recorded votes are detected automatically, so spacing may differ from the original. The official copy governs.
PHONE: 315.435.3770 FAX: 315.435.3669 ONGOVED.COM Meeting Agenda October 19, 2021 8:00 AM Call to Order the Meeting of the Audit Committee 8:05 AM Call to Order the Meeting of the Finance Committee 8:10 AM Call to Order the Meeting of the Agency A. Approval of Minutes-September 14 , 2021 B. Treasurer’s Report C. Payment of Bills D. Conflict of Interest Action Items 1. DL Manufacturing, Inc. / Metz Properties LLC (3101-21-04A) Second Meeting DL Manufacturing, Inc. and Metz Properties LLC are proposing an expansion to their current facility for warehousing and manufacturing in the Town of Cicero. The
applicant is requesting exemption from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination.
b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes.
Representative: Joseph Markert, President and Owner, DL Manufacturing
TreyJay LOSO, LLC is proposing to develop a 13 individual apartment building complex that will house 248apartment units (one and two bedroom) on Oneida Lake in the Town of Cicero. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording tax.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination.
b. A resolution of the Board authorizing exemptions from certain sales and use taxes. c. A resolution of the Board authorizing exemptions from mortgage recording taxes. d. A resolution of the Board authorizing exemptions from real property taxes.
Representative: James Breuer, Manager, Hueber-Breuer
SSC Cicero LLC is proposing to construct a 5 mega-watt solar project in the Town of Cicero. The applicant is requesting exemptions from real property taxes.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination.
b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain real property taxes.
Representative: John Switzer, Managing Member, Summit Solar Capitol, LLC
NYCANNA, LLC is proposing to expand their facility with an expansion of 56,834 square feet of space. The facility is located in the Town of Dewitt (Village of East Syracuse). Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board declaring intent to be the lead agency for purposes of a coordinated review pursuant to SEQRA.
b. A resolution of the Board authorizing a public hearing.
Representative: William Lettier, General Manager, NYCANNA, LLC
RPNY Solar 5, LLC is proposing a 1.6 MW Solar energy system farm located on 6.95 acres in the Town of Manlius. The applicant is requesting exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes and mortgage recording taxes.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing a public hearing.
Representative: Brian Madigan, Project Developer, Renewable Properties 2 6. Armoured One, LLC / North Midler Properties, LLC (3101-18-06A) Meeting to Modify Request for execution and delivery of Mortgages and Conditional Assignment of Leases and Rents with respect to a refinancing Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing execution and delivery of documents.
Representative: Samantha Podlas, Legal Counsel, Barclay Damon
Request for execution and delivery of a Ground Lease Mortgage Recognition Agreement with respect to a refinancing Agency Action Requested:
a. Resolution of the Board authorizing execution and delivery of documents.
Representative: Samantha Podlas, Legal Counsel, Barclay Damon 8. The Landings at Meadowood Apartments Owner KOFP LLC (f/k/a Morgan B-ville Apartments, LLC) (3101-15-09A) Meeting to Modify Request for execution and delivery of a Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement with respect to a refinancing Agency Action Requested:
a. Resolution of the Board authorizing execution and delivery of documents Representative: Samantha Podlas, Legal Counsel, Barclay Damon
Agency Action Requested:
a. Approval of the draft Agency 2022 Budget Representative: Nate Stevens, Treasurer, OCIDA Executive Session 3
Authorization to enter into purchase contracts for eleven parcels of property.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing the adoption of a SEQRA determination.
b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the Executive Director to enter into purchase contracts and any related documents with respect to eleven parcels of property.
Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director, OCIDA Adjourn 4
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Regular Meeting Minutes September 14, 2021 A regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 333 West Washington Street, Syracuse, New York in the large conference room on the first floor.
Patrick Hogan called the meeting to order at 8:05 am with the following:
PRESENT:
Patrick Hogan Janice Herzog Victor Ianno Steve Morgan Susan Stanczyk Fanny Villarreal
ABSENT: Kevin Ryan
ALSO PRESENT:
Robert M. Petrovich, Executive Director Nate Stevens, Treasurer Nancy Lowery, Secretary Karen Doster, Recording Secretary Jeff Davis, Barclay Damon Law Firm Samantha Podlas, Barclay Damon Law Firm Carolyn Evans-Dean, Office of Economic Development Rebecca Shiroff, Office of Economic Development Len Rauch, Office of Economic Development Peter Blasioli, Tracey Road Equipment, Inc.
Brian Letcher, Tracey Road Equipment, Inc.
Jim Gosier, Ultra Dairy James Trasher, CHA Consulting Wendy Lougnot, Ranalli Super DC, LLC David Spotts, SSC Cicero Mitch Latimer, Carpenters Local 277 Chris Bianchi (via webinar) APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES – AUGUST 24, 2021 Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved the regular meeting minutes of August 24, 2021 meetings. Motion was carried.
TREASURER’S REPORT Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of August 2021.
Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved the Treasurer’s Report for the month of August 2021. Motion was carried.
Nate Stevens gave a brief review of the Payment of Bills Schedule #461.
Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved the Payment of Bills Schedule #461 for $645,027.82 and PILOT payments to City of Syracuse for $1,454.24, Onondaga County for $935.04, Town of DeWitt for $14.33, Town of Onondaga for $2.92 and Jamesville DeWitt Central School District for $93.80. Motion was carried.
The Conflict of Interest was circulated and there were no conflicts reported.
Peter Blasioli stated Tracey Road Equipment is building an 18,000 square foot addition to their service shop and will be moving some sales offices to allow them to better operate and expand business. He stated they will be creating 35 jobs over the next several years. He stated obviously with the price of materials during COVID there has been a significant increase so that is why they are before the board looking for an increase in their sales and use tax exemption. Nancy Lowery stated a public hearing was held and there were no comments on this request.
Susan Stanczyk asked what the project status is. Brian Letcher stated their goal is to try and enclose the building by Christmas.
2 Steve Morgan asked if they started construction yet. Brian Letcher stated yes and they are about 30% into it.
Patrick Hogan stated they are experiencing the same as everyone. Brian Letcher stated yes and they have made changes because of the lack of supplies. He stated they made modifications which cost them money just to keep it on track with the timing.
Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing additional financial assistance in the form of an increase in the Sales and Use Tax Exemption. Motion was carried.
ULTRA DAIRY EXPANSION – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (3101-21-11H)
Jim Gosier stated Ultra Dairy received preliminary approval from the Town of DeWitt for this project and a next phase. He stated the Town issued its environmental determination last week at its regular Planning Board meeting and he thinks that was the last obstacle for this Board to be able to proceed. He stated they are happy to get started on the Wastewater Treatment facility which is really the linchpin for future expansions there. He stated they are doing that hand in hand with County WEP. He stated they began construction of a force main sewer this week that is going to allow Ultra Dairy and adjoining property owners to continue expansions in that area. Jeff Davis stated the Town did proceed with their SEQR review and this is an unlisted action under SEQR however OCIDA was not identified as an involved agency at the time the Town did their review. He stated if we had been identified we would have consented to the Town being lead agency. He stated what we are doing for the resolution before the Board for SEQR purposes is also noting it is an unlisted action and in recognition of the fact that we would have been an involved agency and consented to the Planning Board’s lead agency status at the Town level, we are affirming, accepting and adopting the negative declaration issued by the Planning Board for the project. He stated we are attaching a copy of that to our resolution.
Nancy Lowery stated a public hearing was held and there were no comments.
3 Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the Ultra Dairy Expansion project. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes.
Sue Stanczyk and Steve Morgan recused themselves and left meeting.
James Trasher stated he is from CHA Consulting and is representing Ranalli Super DC, LLC/United Auto Supply. He stated they have gone through the approval process with the Town of Lysander for the construction of a 360,000 square foot warehouse at the intersection of 690 and Hencle Boulevard. He stated the property has been zoned industrial for years. He stated when they initially started the project it was 1,000,000 square feet. He stated Jim Ranalli started his business here 50 years ago and has grown over the northeast. He stated his expansion plans are based on online sales and there is a need for additional warehousing space. He stated he purchased the old P & C warehouse and has transformed that. He stated he constructed 100,000 sq ft facility at the old Roth Steel and this was the next in the expansion plans to keep up with the auto parts industry. He stated as part of the application there is 120+ jobs that would be created at the new facility. He stated there are DOT improvements where they have to do road widening, traffic signal, water main extension and they will provide water to the adjacent properties and sewer. He stated they have been working with the Onondaga County Department of Water and Environmental Protection for a regional pump station that would be located on the property so if future sewers were needed at the Hencle Boulevard/690 intersection, they would connect down Oswego Road. He stated this is a $48 million + project. He stated they have already commenced site work because with seasons changing quickly they needed to hit the ground and start moving.
4 Jeff Davis asked if the site work is just clearing and grubbing type work. James Trasher stated it is clearing, grubbing and a storm water pond as well as a construction entrance and spreading of top soil.
Patrick Hogan stated with going from 1,000,000 sq ft down to 360,000 square, there were plans, architects hired etc. and he imagines that is unanticipated expense. James Trasher stated they were there and ready to go for the larger facility but because of the public outcry on the size of the facility they scaled it back. He stated going through the dollars and cents of a 1,000,000 sq ft building it was $120 million so scaling it back made it simpler and easier. He stated this is the project they are proposing at this time and cannot guarantee that they won’t be back before the Board for more but at this time this satisfies the need of the tenant so they are here with the 360,000 sq ft project.
Patrick Hogan asked if the project will be difficult without the PILOT. James Trasher yes.
Patrick Hogan asked if they already cleared the land. James Trasher stated yes.
Victor Ianno stated this is the type of project we want and these are local companies looking to do things here. He stated this is a home grown company and I am in favor of it.
Patrick Hogan stated he agrees but he wanted to point out certain challenges with the pandemic and the public involvement. James Trasher stated when they started this project the price of steel was down and everything has escalated. He stated some of it is order issues because other projects have the supplies. He stated some of it is a sit and wait. He stated they are really looking to be in the ground by the winter, have construction completed within 12 months and be open a year from now.
Victor Ianno stated it is a great project and he drove by the property and he thought “what is everyone complaining about, there is nothing here.” Fanny Villarreal asked what the types of jobs are. James Trasher stated they are full time management level and warehousing jobs. He stated they are $20 an hour plus benefits.
5 Nancy Lowery stated a public hearing was held and there were 4 commenters that expressed they were not in favor of the project. She stated it was a combination of the issues around what the planning board had addressed but also that they just did not feel benefits were appropriate. She stated we did receive 3 written comments and the comments were distributed to the Board.
Jeff Davis stated this is a Type 1 action and we had not been identified at the time on the SEQR EAF as an involved agency and had we received the letter we would have consented. He stated in recognition of that we are affirming, accepting and adopting the negative declaration that was issued by the Planning Board.
Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing adoption of SEQRA negative declaration determination for the Ranalli Super DC, LLC project. Susan Stanczyk and Steve Morgan recused. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide to include exemptions from certain sales and use taxes, real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes and mortgage recording taxes for the Ranalli Super DC, LLC project. Susan Stanczyk and Steve Morgan recused. Motion was carried.
Susan Stanczyk and Steve Morgan returned to the meeting.
David Spotts stated SSC, Cicero, LLC is constructing a 5 megawatt AC community solar facility located at 5827 McKinley Road in Cicero. He stated there is some Ag but mostly industrial currently being used for exterior construction material storage. He stated the site is about 50 acres. He stated they worked with the Town to go through the SEQR process and received letters of no objection from both the School District and the Town of Cicero. He stated they are requesting real property tax abatement. He stated it is important to note that projects like this are much less or nearly infeasible given the recent loss of NYS incentives for these types of projects so they appreciate the Agency’s consideration in bringing these projects to realty.
6 Upon a motion by Fanny Villarreal, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing a public hearing for the SSC, Cicero, LLC project. Motion was carried.
Jeff Davis stated this is similar to applications that have been before the Board in the past on solar matters. He stated GSPP was previously approved by the Board and they have not proceeded to a closing yet. He stated they have changed their ownership structure and they modified the actual project slightly. He stated the specific change is they are going down about 250 kilowatts AC in overall output of the project and because of the downsizing of the project the construction jobs will go from 25 full time to 10-20 full time during the construction. He stated before the Board is a resolution consenting to the sale of the membership interest and approving the amendments to the application which is a change in the overall size of the project and acreage of the project.
Patrick Hogan asked if the company agreed to all the local stipulations. Jeff Davis stated yes and this is the Agency consenting to the change in ownership process. He stated this is being done pre closing with the Agency. He stated the Board is required to accept the changes prior to proceeding to a closing.
Susan Stanczyk asked if the project itself has been downsized, does that affect any of the previous allocations of money for them? Jeff Davis asked Nate Stevens if it is based on the overall size of the project. Nate Stevens stated yes.
Susan Stanczyk asked if it was the size of the project not the production. Jeff Davis stated there is a decrease from 3,750 kilowatts AC to 3,500 kilowatts AC.
Janice Herzog asked if there needs to be certain disclosure in terms of national or international ownership and who is running and operating the facility. Jeff Davis stated due diligence is done to make sure they are an authentic business in New York so yes but not in terms of US based. He stated they are required to provide us with due diligence to review. He stated in this case as with most of the solar projects that we have, you typically have a company that comes in to start the project, get their approvals and then someone else comes in to acquire interest in the project 7 so they can run it, own it and manage it. He stated in this case we had GSPP Holdco was the original applicant before the Board and GSPP Holdco has now entered into an agreement with GSPP Holdco II LLC and assigned, transferred and sold 100 percent of the membership interest. He stated it is switch over and change of name but down the road a lot of it is the same.
Janice Herzog asked if it is mostly the same people doing this. Jeff Davis stated it depends. Samantha Podlas stated she reviews certificates of formation of the entities that are the new membership owner, the operating agreements to make the new membership owner is reflected in the operating agreement as well as the transfer assignment assumption of membership interest are reviewed as part of the due diligence prior to drafting the resolution.
Janice Herzog stated we have a lot of solar projects and asked if we have a summary of where things stand and what the ownership is for the projects that we have supported. Jeff Davis stated we don’t have a standalone document but we can construct one.
Janice Herzog stated they come in piece meal, then we have all these projects with ownership changes. Robert Petrovich stated we could prepare a summary of the solar projects, its size, its megawatts, where it’s located and the current ownership entity. Janice Herzog stated that would be helpful. She stated we do a lot of these projects and to have an overview would be helpful. Jeff Davis stated most IDAs across the state see this with solar projects where there is changes in ownership one or two times throughout the process unlike the typical applicant where a local company coming before the IDA; we know who they are and that they are going to build something. He stated it is kind of the nature of how that business is being developed in NY. Jeff Davis stated green energy is huge so there are entities that want to say they purchased so much of their energy from green energy. He stated they can buy into your company that invests in and say I am getting my energy through that concept. He stated a lot of larger entities in Upstate New York are looking for green energy sources so there is a market for that.
Janice Herzog stated it is good but because it is a new dynamic in our community she thinks it is helpful to understand what the dynamics of it is.
Robert Petrovich stated staff will put together a list and get it out to the Board.
8 Patrick Hogan stated one of the reasons we are involved in this is because the local assessors have trouble assessing the real property.
Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution consenting to the sale of membership interest of the GSPP Sentinel Heights Road, LLC project applicant and approving amendments to the application. Motion was carried.
Samantha Podlas stated similar to what was done for GSPP, it is a change of ownership interest but we closed Abundant Solar SK1 in August 2020. She stated pursuant to the lease agreement, the entity needs to come back before the Board if the membership interest changed so just like with GSPP documents were reviewed to ensure they referenced the correct membership owner as well as the transfer documentation. She stated the new membership owner is Solar Energy Fund III Partnership LLC. She stated the company is back before the Board to get consent pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement before the transfer occurs.
Jeff Davis stated the only difference between Abundant and GSPP is we have already closed on Abundant Solar and they are required to get the Board’s consent. He stated this is a prerequisite before proceeding with a change in ownership.
Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Susan Stanczyk, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution consenting to the sale of membership interest of a company with a current straight- lease transaction for the Abundant Solar Power LLC project. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Steve Morgan, the OCIDA Board went into executive session at 8:51 am. Motion was carried.
9 Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Janice Herzog, the OCIDA Board adjourned executive session at 9:13 am. Motion was carried.
Jeff Davis stated before the Board is a SEQR resolution with regard to the acquisition of a parcel of property at the White Pine Commerce Park. He read a summary of the resolution.
Upon a motion by Janice Herzog, seconded by Victor Ianno, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing adoption of SEQRA determination. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution authorizing the Executive Director to enter into a purchase contract and any related document with respect to one parcel of property. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Victor Ianno, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board approved a resolution adopting the revised OCIDA project application. Motion was carried.
Upon a motion by Susan Stanczyk, seconded by Fanny Villarreal, the OCIDA Board adjourned the meeting at 9:17 am. Motion was carried.
_________________________________ Nancy Lowery, Secretary 10
PHONE: 315.435.3770 • FAX: 315.435.3669 September 30, 2021
Revenue / Expense / Income Current Period Current YTD Amount Change to Budget Operating Revenue 191,676 1,584,791 1,646,000 (61,209) Administrative Expense 55,971 386,573 1,008,000 (621,427) Operating/Program Exp. 34,726 716,008 638,000 78,008 Net Ordinary Income 100,979 482,210 - 482,210 Current Assets Current YTD Prior YTD Total Cash 5,178,465 6,596,105 Less Pass Through Received 2,420,941 1,807,097 Available Cash 2,757,524 4,789,008 Receivables (less pass through rec.) 223,524 950,524 Grant Reimbursements - 268,733 Total 2,981,048 6,008,265 Reserve for Contracts County Operations 2021 621,427 333 W. Washington St 2021 Rent 35,582 OBG WPCP CO #4 Additional Studies 336,856 JMT 800 Hiawatha Engineering 10,234 Barclay Damon WPCP Options - Total 1,004,098 Receivables 0-120 days 1,500 > 120 days 222,024 Total 223,524 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Profit and Loss September 2021
Income
2116.1 Agency Fees 65,209.00 Total 2116 Fees 65,209.00 2410 Lease Income 1,500.00 Total 500 Operating Revenue 66,709.00
2401 Interest Income 30.78 501.1 Subsidies Grants Donations 124,936.57 Total 501 Non-Operating Revenue 124,967.35
529 PILOT Income 1,465,645.92 Total 534 Pilot & Pass Thru Revenue 1,465,645.92 Total Income $1,657,322.27 GROSS PROFIT $1,657,322.27 Expenses
6406.50 Consulting Services 5,000.00 Total 6406 Other Professional Services 5,000.00 6407 Administrative Expense 55,970.66 6408 Meeting Expenses 406.26 6409 Conference Attendence 837.23 6410 Office Expense 836.62 Total 6400 Operating Expense 63,050.77
6510.7 WPCP Marketing 8,153.94 6511 WPCP Closing Costs 12,947.22 Total 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 21,101.16 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 6530.8 Other Professional Services 6,545.00 Total 6530 800 Hiawatha Blvd. West 6,545.00 Total 6500 Agency Program Expenses 27,646.16
6605.2 PILOT Expense 1,465,645.92 Total 6605 Pilot & Pass Thru Expenses 1,465,645.92 Total 6600 Non-Operating Expenses 1,465,645.92 Total Expenses $1,556,342.85 NET OPERATING INCOME $100,979.42 NET INCOME $100,979.42 Page 16 Accrual Basis Friday, October 8, 2021 11:46 AM GMT-04:00 1/1 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of September 30, 2021
Current Assets Bank Accounts 200 Cash 0.00 200.1 Cash - M & T Checking 4,296,984.91 200.2 Cash - M & T Money Maker Savings 890,387.86 200.4 Destiny USA Restricted Cash -8,957.82 210 Petty Cash 50.00 Total 200 Cash 5,178,464.95 Total Bank Accounts $5,178,464.95 Accounts Receivable 380 Accounts Rec.
380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 157,967.71 Total 380 Accounts Rec. 157,967.71 Total Accounts Receivable $157,967.71 Other Current Assets 391 Long Tern Receivable 222,024.00 Total Other Current Assets $222,024.00 Total Current Assets $5,558,456.66 Page 17 Accrual Basis Friday, October 8, 2021 11:47 AM GMT-04:00 1/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of September 30, 2021
Fixed Assets
101 White Pines Commerce Park 4,455,401.50
101.101 CHA GEIS 1 267,452.05 101.102 CHA GEIS 2 219,439.36 101.104 GEIS Reg Plan Board Overview 19,797.74 Total 101.1 WPCP GEIS 506,689.15 101.2 WPCP Legal 69,774.25 101.3 Engineering Services 52,675.00 101.301 Temporary Access 4,055.44 101.4 Environmental/Demo Services 10,318.98 Total 101.3 Engineering Services 67,049.42
101.501 Land Purchases 1,160,063.57 101.502 Closing Costs 3,168.14 Total 101.5 Land Acquisition Costs 1,163,231.71 Total 101 White Pines Commerce Park 6,262,146.03 106 North Salina Properties 0.00 106.1 435 North Salina 17,083.55 106.3 435 North Salina Building 634,421.53 Total 106 North Salina Properties 651,505.08 107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42 Total 100 Land 7,518,491.53
104.1 Office Furniture 1,429.00 104.2 Equipment 4,588.00 Total 104 Machinery & Equipment 6,017.00 211 A/D Office Furniture -2,862.00 213 A/D Buildings -81,335.00 Total Fixed Assets $7,440,311.53 Other Assets 240 Blue Sky Redevelopment 1,641.76 Total Other Assets $1,641.76 TOTAL ASSETS $13,000,409.95 Page 18 Accrual Basis Friday, October 8, 2021 11:47 AM GMT-04:00 2/3 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Balance Sheet As of September 30, 2021
Liabilities Current Liabilities Other Current Liabilities 600 Accounts Payable 0.00 600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 386,573.14 600.206 Mileage Reimbursement 92.34 600.208 BlueRock Energy Agreement Deposit 25,000.00 600.209 Syracuse Rail Overpayment 500.00 Total 600 Accounts Payable 412,165.48
603 PILOT Pass Thru 156,467.73 604 Other Pass Thrus 74,063.70 Total 601 PILOT and Pass Thru Payable 230,531.43
631.105 Camillus 155,219.17 Total 631.1 Towns 155,219.17
631.22 East Syracuse 21,346.86 Total 631.2 Villages 21,346.86
631.305 Baldwinsville 1,529,954.00 631.315 East Syracuse-Minoa 52,697.44 631.36 West Genesee 531,012.95 Total 631.3 Schools 2,113,664.39 631.4 Onondaga County 130,710.88 Total 631 Due to Other Governments 2,420,941.30 Total Other Current Liabilities $3,063,638.21 Total Current Liabilities $3,063,638.21 Total Liabilities $3,063,638.21 Equity 3900 Equity Unreserved 6,735,894.07 3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 2,345,838.63 463 Reserve For Contracts 1,004,098.43 465 Equity - Unreserved -631,269.43 Net Income 482,210.04 Total Equity $9,936,771.74 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $13,000,409.95 Page 19 Accrual Basis Friday, October 8, 2021 11:47 AM GMT-04:00 3/3
PAYMENT OF BILL - SCHEDULE #462 October 19, 2021
1. BARCLAY DAMON LLP* $ 181,389.50 Land Purchase 2. CENTER FOR CREATIVE LAND CONSULTING* $ 6,545.00 Inv#1, 1st Payment Roth EPA Grant Consulting 3. BARCLAY DAMON LLP** $ 331,557.72 Land Purchase 4. ONONDAGA CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. $ 15,050.07 Inv#1118 & 1119, 3rd Quarter 2021 Rent & Office Machine 5. ADVANCE MEDIA NEW YORK $ 518.72
6. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 4,968.75 Inv#5136544, 5139992, 5139865 & 5139888, General & Roth Legal thru August 31, 2021 7. FEDEX $ 22.67 Inv#7-512-47417, Shipping 8. ROBERT PETROVICH $ 96.26 NYSEDC Annual Mileage 9. NANCY LOWERY $ 103.84 NYSEDC Annual Mileage & Tolls 10. NATE STEVENS $ 109.91 NYSEDC Annual Mileage & Tolls TOTAL $ 540,362.44 * Ratification of Checks dated September 16, 2021 ** Ratification of Check dated September 21, 2021 1
PAYMENT OF BILL - SCHEDULE #462 October 19, 2021 PILOT Payments 1. HINSDALE ROAD GROUP, LLC* $ 525,000.00
2. ONONDAGA COUNTY $ 140,434.14
3. TOWN OF CAMILLUS $ 155,219.17
4. VILLAGE OF EAST SYRACUSE $ 21,346.86
5. BALDWINSVILLE CSD $ 1,529,954.00
6. EAST SYRACUSE MINOA CSD $ 176,400.36
7. WEST GENESEE CSD $ 531,012.95
8. CITY OF SYRACUSE $ 8,493.64 3rd Quarter 2021 COR IH Master PILOT Payment 9. SYRACUSE CSD $ 14,547.90 3rd Quarter 2021 COR IH Master PILOT Payment TOTAL $ 3,102,409.02 *Ratification of Check dated September 23, 2021 1
DESCRIPTION TERM CONTRACT PAID OUTSTANDING ONONDAGA COUNTY OED 2021 1-1-21-12-31-21 $1,008,000.00 $386,573.14 $621,426.86 333 W. WASHINGTON ST 2021 RENT 1-1-21-12-31-21 $65,000.00 $29,418.38 $35,581.62 OBG WPCP CO #4 ADDITIONAL STUDIES 11-30-18-12-31-21 $800,000.00 $463,143.95 $336,856.05 JMT 800 HIAWATHA ENGINEERING 2/13/19-12-31-21 $25,000.00 $14,766.10 $10,233.90 BARCLAY DAMON WPCP OPTIONS 11/30/20-12-31-21 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $0.00 $2,098,000.00 $1,093,901.57 $1,004,098.43
AGENCY FEES RECEIVABLE $0.00 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE GENERAL $1,500.00 QUASI-EQUITY LOAN RECEIVABLE $0.00 GRANTS RECEIVABLE $0.00 LONG TERM RECEIVABLE $222,024.00 TOTAL $223,524.00 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency DRAFT Project Summary 10/8/2021 1. Project DL Manufacturing 2. Project Number - 3. Location Cicero 4. School District Cicero-North Syracuse
5. Tax Parcel(s) 018.-06-01.6 Village North Syracuse 7.Total Project Cost $ 2,332,337.00 8. Total Jobs 57 Land $ - 8A. Job Retention 51 Site Work $ 349,900 8B: Job Creation 6 Building $ 1,650,100 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ 20,000 Equipment $ 80,000 Equipment Subject to NYS Production Exemption $ - Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 120,000 Financial Charges $ - Legal Fees $ 20,000 Other $ 92,337 Cost Benefit Analysis DL Manufacturing Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Estimated Abatement Cost $436,656 Sales Tax Abatement $60,000 Mortgage Recording Tax Abatement $13,125 Real Property Tax Relief $363,531 New Investment $7,111,427 PILOT Payments $1,042,808 Project Wages (10 years) $3,125,390 DL Manufacturing will be expanding by constructing a 17,000 sq.ft. building to be used for Construction Wages $293,828 manufacturing, warehousing, training and conference center. Employee Benefits (10 years) $625,078 Project Capital Investment $2,000,000 Agency Fees $24,323 Benefit:Cost Ratio 16.29 :1 DL Manufacturing 10/8/2021 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet DRAFT for 10 years OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 1,486,000 Projected investment $ 1,650,100 OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 1,395,900 OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 2,881,900 Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 725,154 Scheduled PILOT payments $ 1,042,808 Full Tax Onondaga Cicero-North North PILOT YEAR Exemption % Cicero Total PILOT Payment w/o Net Exemption County Syracuse Syracuse
1 100% $ 7,826 $ 7,826 $ 35,523 $ 15,051 $ 66,225.75 $ 128,436 $ 62,210 2 90% $ 8,732 $ 8,732 $ 39,637 $ 16,794 $ 73,895.72 $ 131,005 $ 57,109 3 80% $ 9,672 $ 9,672 $ 43,901 $ 18,601 $ 81,846.00 $ 133,625 $ 51,779 4 70% $ 10,645 $ 10,645 $ 48,320 $ 20,474 $ 90,084.73 $ 136,297 $ 46,213 5 60% $ 11,654 $ 11,654 $ 52,899 $ 22,414 $ 98,620.26 $ 139,023 $ 40,403 6 50% $ 12,699 $ 12,699 $ 57,641 $ 24,423 $ 107,461.19 $ 141,804 $ 34,343 7 40% $ 13,781 $ 13,781 $ 62,551 $ 26,504 $ 116,616.31 $ 144,640 $ 28,024 8 30% $ 14,901 $ 14,901 $ 67,636 $ 28,658 $ 126,094.64 $ 147,533 $ 21,438 9 20% $ 16,060 $ 16,060 $ 72,898 $ 30,887 $ 135,905.47 $ 150,483 $ 14,578 10 10% $ 17,260 $ 17,260 $ 78,344 $ 33,195 $ 146,058.28 $ 153,493 $ 7,435 TOTAL $ 123,230 $ 123,230 $ 559,349 $ 237,000 $ 1,042,808 $ 1,406,339 $ 363,531 Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Jobs Current/Actuals 51 Creation Goals 6 0 4 2 Total Employment Goals 57 51 55 57 57 57 I.G Applicant Business Description: company’s background, products, customers, goods and services 2 I.H Percentage of your total annual supplies, raw materials and vendor services are purchased from firms in Onondaga County. 3 II.C Summary of how this project will help your business grow: 4 II.D Description of Project: 5 (i) Size of Project: 5 (ii) Size of Lot: 5 (iii) Usage of Site: 5 (iv) Principal Activities to occur at Project Site: 5 (v) Why the Applicant is undertaking the Project: 5 Site Plans/ Sketches/ Maps: 6 I.G Applicant Business Description: company’s background, products, customers, goods and services DL Manufacturing was created in 1996 with the invention of the Versa Light Dock Light in the basement of the original owner, Donald Metz. The Versa Light improved loading docks with the use of a Halogen bulb, a major upgrade to incandescent bulbs, which reduced maintenance and provided twice as much light for workers inside the trailer. Today, we manufacture over twenty patented products for the loading dock industry. Our products are specifically designed to improve productivity, enhance safety and reduce maintenance.
Each product is engineered with innovative ideas and technology by a team of locally produced engineers. Our products are sold and installed by a team of solution based sales representatives and specially trained installation crews. We are known for serving customers beyond expectations, in fact, a fortune 25 company recently referred to us as their SWAT team: if they have a problem they can’t figure out – we are the first ones they call. This consumer centric mentality is the biggest reason why companies like Walmart, Kroger, Lowe’s, Home Depot and Wegmans continue to rely on DL Manufacturing for solutions at their loading docks.
I.H Percentage of your total annual supplies, raw materials and vendor services are purchased from firms in Onondaga County.
Total 33.35% Acro Fab $178,288.09 $9,500,000.00 1.88% Anthony River $4,286.10 $9,500,000.00 0.05% Business Systems $54,606.42 $9,500,000.00 0.57% Eagle Comtronics $522,276.16 $9,500,000.00 5.50% Empire Freight Logistics $332,975.70 $9,500,000.00 3.51% Express Shipping $4,095.00 $9,500,000.00 0.04% Falso Industries $1,113,304.82 $9,500,000.00 11.72% Fastenal $48,761.32 $9,500,000.00 0.51% Haun Welding $3,057.70 $9,500,000.00 0.03% Hiawatha Fasteners $1,024.51 $9,500,000.00 0.01% Ivy Service & Supply $15,451.40 $9,500,000.00 0.16% Jamestown Container $128,763.12 $9,500,000.00 1.36% Jaquith $25,927.30 $9,500,000.00 0.27% KL Electric $37,743.00 $9,500,000.00 0.40% McIntosh $212,639.16 $9,500,000.00 2.24% Murphy Nolan $160,749.85 $9,500,000.00 1.69% Net Logistics $131,877.00 $9,500,000.00 1.39% Paratore $45,457.25 $9,500,000.00 0.48% Renaissance Renovators $8,525.00 $9,500,000.00 0.09% Syracuse Business $26,294.00 $9,500,000.00 0.28% Vinyl Designs $8,099.34 $9,500,000.00 0.09% XTO $104,075.34 $9,500,000.00 1.10% equipment 8.5 million parts 1 million II.C Summary of how this project will help your business grow:
For the past (4) years we have leased over 10,000 sf of offsite space for warehousing raw materials to manufacture our products. This setup is very inefficient because we have to lease a truck and transport parts two or three times per day to keep our lines running. We have also introduced new products that require additional floor space for manufacturing. As a result, we are clustered and overflowing, creating additional inefficiencies. This expansion will solve this problem. We also plan to create a training and virtual sales center. Since covid, we have struggled to get face time with customers, so we created a virtual sales call button on our website that has been successful. The additional space and video/tech capability will help us make a more robust virtual sales presentation. This expansion will set us for continued revenue growth by freeing up space in the original warehouse that can be used to manufacture future products in a safe, efficient manner.
II.D Description of Project:
(i) Size of Project:
Total square footage project 17,000 sq. ft.
Manufacturing 6,500 sq. ft.
Warehousing 9,500 sq. ft.
(ii) Size of Lot:
Size of Lot 43,560 sq. ft.
(iii) Usage of Site:
Current Use of Site: None Intended Use of Site: Manufacturing, Warehousing, Training, Sales Meeting and Conference Center (iv) Principal Activities to occur at Project Site:
This project site will be used as warehousing and manufacturing space for DL Manufacturing upon project completion. This includes our growing Knockout Door line (MxV, PxV and QxV), Fan and Truck Cooling line (AeroTec and DL Fan), and Safety Product Lines (Smart Chock and Safety Signal). We are also investing in a remote Sales Presentation Center and Training Room. Since covid we are finding ways to improve our ability to present our products to potential customers we can’t meet in person. (v) Why the Applicant is undertaking the Project:
We currently use off site storage for many of our raw materials. Our expansion project will allow us to expand our growing manufacturing space and bring warehousing onsite to help make us more efficient, streamlined and productive.
Site Plans/ Sketches/ Maps: See attachments Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification.
Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information.
Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete.
A. Project and Sponsor Information.
Name of Action or Project:
DL Manufacturing Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map):
Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need):
Construction of a 14,000 +/- SF manufacturing and warehousing building addition. Site work includes the construction of a stormwater management facility, parking lot addition, general landscape improvements and an employee patio space. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: 315-445-7980 Scott Freeman - Keplinger Freeman Associates E-Mail: sf@keplingerfreeman.com Address: 6320 Fly Road, Suite 109 City/PO: East Syracuse State: Zip Code:
Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address:
City/PO: State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: 315-463-7348 Metz Properties, LLC E-Mail: jmarkert@dlmanufacturing.com Address:
City/PO: State: Zip Code: N Syracuse NY 13212 B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Town , Yes No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village Yes No ✔ Village of North Syracuse Planning Board & ZBA 07/16/21 Planning Board or Commission c. City Town or Yes No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies Yes No e. County agencies Yes No f. Regional agencies Yes No g. State agencies ✔ Yes No NYSDEC Wetland Permit 1/21/21 h. Federal agencies Yes No ✔ Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdictional 6/10/21 Determination i. Coastal Resources.
i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? Yes ✔ No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? Yes ✔ No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? Yes ✔ No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions.
Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the Yes ✔ No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed?
x If Yes, complete sections C, F and G.
x If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans.
a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site ✔ Yes No where the proposed action would be located?
If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action Yes No ✔ would be located?
b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway Yes ✔ No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s):
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, Yes ✔ No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan?
If Yes, identify the plan(s):
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. Yes No ✔ If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PD - Planned Unit Development _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ✔ Yes No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? Yes ✔ No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services.
a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse Central School District b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse Police Department c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________ North Syracuse Fire Department d. What parks serve the project site?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Centerville Park __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? Industrial _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? _____________ 3.55 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? _____________ .89 acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _____________ 34 acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? Yes No ✔ i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________
d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? ✔ No Yes If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? Yes No iii. Number of lots proposed? ________ iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? Yes ✔ No If No, anticipated period of construction: _____ months If Yes:
x Total number of phases anticipated _____ x Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year x Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year x Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Does the project include new residential uses? Yes ✔ No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed.
One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? Yes No ✔ If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ 1 ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height;
20'-10" ________width;
113 and _______ 124 length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ 14000 square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any Yes No ✔ liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: Stormwater ________________________________________________________________________________ Best Management Practices - Storage ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: Ground water Surface water streams ✔ Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Runoff iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ .18 acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ 3 height; _______ 275 length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Earth Fill D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? Yes ✔ No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes:
i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? x Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ x Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? Yes No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? Yes No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment Yes No ✔ into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area?
If Yes:
i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ BRE-27 State Wetland _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Filling approximately .2 acres.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes ✔ No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? Yes ✔ No If Yes:
x a of vegetation proposed to be removed ___________________________________________________________ x H[SHFWHG acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion________________________________________ x purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ x if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? ✔ Yes No If Yes:
i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ 300 gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ✔ Yes No If Yes:
x Name of district or service area: County _________________________________________________________________________ Zone 3 Water District x Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? Yes No ✔ x Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No ✔ x Is expansion of the district needed? Yes ✔ No x Do existing lines serve the project site? Yes No ✔ iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? Yes ✔ No If Yes:
x Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? Yes ✔ No If, Yes:
x Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ x Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ x Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ✔ Yes No If Yes:
i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ 300 gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Sanitary Wastewater _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ✔ Yes No If Yes:
x Oak Orchard Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ x Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ Onondaga County Department of Water Environment Protection x Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ✔ Yes No x Is the project site in the existing district? ✔ Yes No x Is expansion of the district needed? Yes ✔ No x Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? Yes No ✔ x Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? Yes ✔ No If Yes:
x Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? Yes ✔ No If Yes:
x Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ x Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ x What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point Yes No ✔ sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction?
If Yes:
i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ .403 acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ 3.55 acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ Building Runoff _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)?
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Stormwater will be directed towards stormwater management facilities.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ x If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? Yes ✔ No iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? Yes ✔ No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel Yes ✔ No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations?
If Yes, identify:
i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, Yes ✔ No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit?
If Yes:
i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet Yes No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate:
x ___________Tons/year ( ) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) x ___________Tons/year ( ) of Nitrous Oxide (N2) x ___________Tons/year ( ) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) x ___________Tons/year ( ) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) x ___________Tons/year ( ) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflo rocarbons (H ) x ___________Tons/year ( ) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, Yes ✔ No landfills, composting facilities)?
If Yes:
i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as Yes ✔ No quarry or landfill operations?
If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial Yes ✔ No new demand for transportation facilities or services?
If Yes:
i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): Morning Evening Weekend Randomly between hours of __________ to ________.
ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day ! """"""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Parking spaces: Existing _____________"""""" Proposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________"""""""" # $ ' * v. +0 0 0 8 0 8 9 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? Yes No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric Yes No or other alternative fueled vehicles?
viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing Yes No pedestrian or bicycle routes?
k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand Yes No ✔ for energy?
If Yes:
i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TBD ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other):
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Grid/ local utility iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade to an existing substation? Yes ✔ No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply.
i. During Construction: ii. During Operations:
x Monday - Friday: _________________________ 8 AM - 5 PM x Monday - Friday: ____________________________
x Saturday: ________________________________ x Saturday: ___________________________________ x Sunday: _________________________________ x Sunday: ____________________________________ x Holidays: ________________________________ x Holidays: ___________________________________ m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ✔ Yes No operation, or both?
If yes:
i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ General construction noise will exist for the duration of the project.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ✔ Yes No Describe: Trees _________________________________________________________________________________________________ to be cleared.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ n.Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? Yes No ✔ If yes:
i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Wallpack lighting will be installed on proposed building. Existing site light poles will be utilized. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ✔ Yes No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Trees will be removed.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? Yes ✔ No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum ( 9 0 over 1,100 gallons) Yes ✔ No or chemical products >@J 9 K ?
If Yes:
Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________ Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year) Generally describe proposed storage facilities________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, Yes ✔ No insecticides) during construction or operation?
If Yes:
i. Describe proposed treatment(s):
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? Yes No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal Yes ✔ No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)?
If Yes:
i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: x Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) x Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: x Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site:
x Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ x Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? Yes ✔ No If Yes:
i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing:
x ________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or x ________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous Yes ✔ No waste?
If Yes:
i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? Yes No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses.
i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site.
Urban ✔ Industrial ✔ Commercial Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) Forest Agriculture Aquatic ✔ Other (specify): ____________________________________ ii. If mix of uses, generally describe:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site.
Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres +/-) x Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces 1.42 1.83 +0.41 x Forested x Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non-
agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) x Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) x Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) x Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) x Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) x Other Describe: _______________________________ ________________________________________ c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? Yes ✔ No i. If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed Yes ✔ No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site?
If Yes, i. Identify Facilities:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? Yes ✔ No If Yes:
i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment:
x Dam height: _________________________________ feet x Dam length: _________________________________ feet x Surface area: _________________________________ acres x Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, Yes ✔ No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes:
i. Has the facility been formally closed? Yes No x If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin Yes ✔ No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes:
i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any Yes ✔ No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site?
If Yes:
i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site Yes No Remediation database? Check all that apply:
Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? Yes ✔ No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s):
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? Yes No x If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ x Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ x Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ x Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ x Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? Yes No x Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ >6 feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? Yes ✔ No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: Niagara Silt Loam ___________________________ 97.7 __________% Cut and Fill ___________________________ 2.3 __________% ____________________________ __________% d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ 4.5 feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: ✔ Well Drained: _____% 2.3 of ite Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site Poorly Drained ✔ _____% 97.7 of ite 0-10%:
f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ✔ _____% 100 of site 10-15%: _____% of site 15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? Yes ✔ No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features.
i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, ✔ Yes No ponds or lakes)?
ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? Yes No ✔ If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i.
iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ✔ Yes No state or local agency?
iv. For each identified wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information x Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ [ Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ t Wetlands: NYS Wetland Name ____________________________________________ NYS Wetland (in a... Approximate Size ___________________ [ Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________
v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired Yes ✔ No waterbodies?
If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? Yes ✔ No j. Is the project site in the 100\year Floodplain? Yes ✔ No k. Is the project site in the 500\year Floodplain? Yes ✔ No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? Yes ✔ No If Yes:
i. Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________ m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ Small Mammals ______________________________ Deer _______________________________ Insects ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? Yes ✔ No If Yes:
i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Extent of community/habitat:
x Currently: ______________________ acres x Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres x Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as Yes ✔ No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? +0 ' ] !"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of Yes ✔ No special concern?
+0 ' ] """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? Yes ✔ No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to Yes ✔ No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304?
If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? Yes ✔ No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National Yes ✔ No Natural Landmark?
If Yes:
i. Nature of the natural landmark: Biological Community Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? Yes ✔ No If Yes:
i. CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district Yes ✔ No which is listed on * ] ^ of Historic P 9 9 0 *'] 00 0 ` ^ { ` K 9 9 0 ] ^ of Historic Places? If Yes:
i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: Archaeological Site Historic Building or District ii. Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Yes ✔ No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? Yes ✔ No If Yes:
i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h. + the project site 0K 0 any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local Yes No ✔ scenic or aesthetic resource?
If Yes:
i. Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Onondaga Lake ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Scenic Lake iii. Distance between project and resource: _____________________ 4.38 miles.
i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers Yes ✔ No Program 6 NYCRR 666?
If Yes:
i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? Yes No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project.
If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them.
G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Scott Freeman - Keplinger Freeman Assoc. 07/22/21 Date_______________________________________
Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________ Landscape Architect PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 EAF Mapper Summary Report Thursday, July 15, 2021 1:03 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.
E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Potential Contamination History] Workbook.
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Listed] Workbook.
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook.
E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation No Site] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands NYS Wetland Name] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands NYS Wetland (in acres):86.5 Size] E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - DEC BRE-27 Wetlands Number] E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] No E.2.i. [Floodway] No E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] No E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] No Full Environmental Page 66 Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 E.2.l. [Aquifers] No E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] No E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Places or State Eligible Sites] Workbook.
E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No Full Environmental Page 67 Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency DRAFT Project Summary 3/5/2021 1. Project Trey Jay Loso, LLC 2. Project Number 3101-21-6A 3. Location Cicero 4. School District Cicero-North Syracuse
5. Tax Parcel(s) 086.-02-25.1 Village - 7.Total Project Cost $ 56,650,000.00 8. Total Jobs 4 Land $ 1,500,000 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work $ 3,500,000 8B: Job Creation 4 Building $ 48,000,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ 400,000 Equipment $ - Equipment Subject to NYS Production Exemption $ - Engineering/Architecture Fees $ 1,100,000 Financial Charges $ 2,150,000 Legal Fees $ - Other $ - Cost Benefit Analysis Trey Jay Loso, LLC Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Estimated Abatement Cost $6,100,723 Sales Tax Abatement $2,500,000 Mortgage Recording Tax Abatement $353,700 Real Property Tax Relief $3,247,023 New Investment $71,702,762 PILOT Payments $3,088,637 Project Wages (10 years) $1,420,000 Development of a 248 unit apartment community in the Town of Cicero on 24 acres of currenly Construction Wages $13,059,000 undeveloped land with marina. Employee Benefits (10 years) $426,000 Project Capital Investment $53,000,000 Agency Fees $709,125 Benefit:Cost Ratio 11.75 :1 DRAFT TreyJay Loso PILOT 3/5/2021 A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet for 10 years OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 666,000 Projected investment $ 48,000,000 OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 16,120,000 OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 16,786,000 Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 251,373 Scheduled PILOT payments $ 3,088,637 Full Tax Onondaga Cicero-North Net PILOT YEAR Exemption % Cicero Total PILOT Payment w/o County Syracuse Exemption
1 100% $ 3,507 $ 3,529 $ 15,921 $ 22,957.04 $ 578,614 $ 555,657 2 90% $ 12,237 $ 12,312 $ 55,544 $ 80,093.17 $ 590,186 $ 510,093 3 80% $ 21,314 $ 21,445 $ 96,747 $ 139,505.56 $ 601,990 $ 462,484 4 70% $ 30,750 $ 30,938 $ 139,575 $ 201,262.42 $ 614,030 $ 412,767 5 60% $ 40,554 $ 40,802 $ 184,078 $ 265,433.74 $ 626,310 $ 360,876 6 50% $ 50,738 $ 51,049 $ 230,304 $ 332,091.42 $ 638,836 $ 306,745 7 40% $ 61,314 $ 61,689 $ 278,307 $ 401,309.22 $ 651,613 $ 250,304 8 30% $ 72,292 $ 72,734 $ 328,137 $ 473,162.91 $ 664,645 $ 191,482 9 20% $ 83,684 $ 84,197 $ 379,849 $ 547,730.21 $ 677,938 $ 130,208 10 10% $ 95,504 $ 96,088 $ 433,499 $ 625,090.95 $ 691,497 $ 66,406 TOTAL $ 471,894 $ 474,782 $ 2,141,961 $ 3,088,637 $ 6,335,660 $ 3,247,023 OCIDA Application Addendum TreyJay Loso, LLC
Description of TreyJay LOSO, LLC Background:
TreyJay LOSO, LLC is a single use limited liability company created solely for this project.
What percentage of Total Annual Supplies Are Coming Form firms in Onondaga County?
The construction of the project will utilize a local labor force and all material suppliers will be in Onondaga County or an immediately surrounding County. Any supplies necessary for the operation of the project once completed will come from Onondaga County.
Summary of how this project will help your business grow:
N/A
Project Description:
(i) The Project consists of approximately 334,000 SF of new construction. The breakdown of each use is as follows:
Club House: 8,000 Square Feet Garages: 18,000 Square Feet Apartments: 308,000 Square Feet There will be a total of 248; 1 and 2 bedroom apartments ranging from 700 to 1,500 Square Feet. Along with the new construction the project will also renovate the existing Marina creating approximately 70 slips for boats up to 34’ and 30 Personal Watercraft slips.
Other amenities of the project will include:
5) 1,100 feet of waterfront 6) 100-foot Sand Beach (ii)Size of the Site: Approximately 18 acres of a 25 acre underutilized property.
(iii)Current Use of the site: Marina and Boat Storage (iv) Principal Products and Activities: The project will consists of Residential Units and a Commercial Marina.
(v)Why the Applicant is undertaking the Project and the need for the requested Benefits:
The applicant is undertaking the project to take an underutilized 25-acre parcel of property on Oneida Lake to fulfill an unmet housing need in Onondaga County and specifically the northern suburbs; but for the benefits offered by the Onondaga County IDA the LOSO project would not be feasible.
THESE DOCUMENTS W ERE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL. THE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNS AND PLANS
ARE OW NED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. THESE
DOCUMENTS MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR USED WITHOUT THE KNOW LEDGE OR CONSENT OF
ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE
C:\Users\ama0035\Documents\18068-LOSO-BLDG-6Bay-R2019_ama0035.rvt 2/25/2021 10:39:21 AM OF NEW YORK TO ALTER OR MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE
DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER.
1 2 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0"
W D D W W D D W
W D W D
UP DN 5'-0" MIN D W D W
W D W D W D W D 2'-0" JAN 9'-5" W D W D 2'-4" W D D W W D D W SEAL:
No. Rev. © 2019 D AM JOB NO. 50 NEW CONSTRUCTION D E DATE ISSUED: % CONSULTANT:
N
O T
Date FO R
LARGE APARTMENT BUILDING C P O N
LG R U E C N
LAKESHORE ROAD, CICERO NY O Desc. N
- ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS PROFESSIONAL. THE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNS AND PLANS OF NEW YORK TO ALTER OR MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE ARE OW NED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, P.C. THESE DOCUMENTS MAY NOT BE ALTERED OR USED WITHOUT THE KNOW LEDGE OR CONSENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS W ERE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED
W
6'-1 1/2" 5'-6" 6'-6"
DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER.
D
4'-0"
This is a long document — showing the opening sections. Read the complete text.