Typeset from the PDF of the official document (read by OCR) — headings, motions and recorded votes are detected automatically, so spacing may differ from the original. The official copy governs.
315.435.3770 • ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT@ONGOV.NET • ONGOVED.COM Regular Meeting Agenda June 4, 2026 Call to Order the Regular Meeting of the Agency A. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes: May 14, 2026 B. Treasurer’s Report C. Payment of Bills D. Conflict of Interest Action Items:
1. Jordan Landing LLC and Jordan Landing Housing Development Fund Corporation (Project #3101-25-07A) Second Meeting The applicant is proposing to construct 65 mixed-income housing units on approximately 8 vacant acres of land in the Village of Jordan. The project will also include a community room, fitness area, supporting housing services, offices, and laundry facilities.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination. b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain real property taxes and real estate transfer taxes.
Representative: Patrick Rock, Jordan Landing LLC, Managing Member
The applicant is proposing to construct an approximately 64,000 sq. ft. extended stay hotel consisting of approximately 103 extended-stay suites with kitchenettes, and approximately 1,100 square feet of meeting space on an approximately 2.5-acre site in the Town of Clay. The project will also include an indoor pool, fitness center, outdoor patio with fire pits, grills, heaters, and seating, laundry facilities, market pantry, breakfast dining area and multi- functional lobby/lounge, and parking to accommodate trailers, boats, construction vehicles, etc. The hotel will be operated under the Home2 Suites by Hilton brand. Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing a public hearing.
Representatives: Neil Patel, Clay Hospitality, LLC, Managing Member Sandeep Gautam, Baywood Hotels, Vice President of Asset Management Matthew Wells, Clay Hospitality, LLC, Counsel Thomas Clifford, Clay Hospitality, LLC, Counsel 3. D&D Motor Systems, Inc. (Project #3101-26-03A) First Meeting The applicant is proposing to acquire an interest in real property containing a 32,344 sq. ft. building in the Village of East Syracuse and move and expand their motor manufacturing business.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing a public hearing.
Representative: Mike Dieroff, D&D Motor Systems, Inc., Founder/Owner/President
Main Campus (Project #3101-23-07A), Rail Spur (Project # 3101-25-06A)
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing an amendment to the contract with Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C., consisting of an increase to the amount authorized for engineering services related to White Pine Science & Technology Park.
Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board adopting the final scoping document pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) for the White Pine Science & Technology Park, and authorizing the filing and distribution of the Final Scope pursuant to the requirements of SEQRA.
Representative: Jeffrey Davis, Agency Counsel Adjourn Regular Meeting Minutes May 14, 2026 A Regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Thursday, May 14, 2026, at 335 Montgomery Street, Floor 2M, Syracuse, New York.
Prior to calling the meeting to order, Randy Wolken welcomed the new board members, and each introduced themselves.
Randy Wolken called the meeting to order at 8:30 AM with the following in attendance:
PRESENT:
Randy Wolken Alan Marzullo Mark Muthumbi Michael Greene Christina Hollenback Sally Santangelo
ABSENT:
Deka Eysaman
ALSO PRESENT:
Robert Petrovich, Executive Director Nate Stevens, Treasurer Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary Robert Schoeneck, Assistant Treasurer Evan Carter, Assistant Secretary Amanda Fitzgerald, Esq., Agency Counsel Jeffrey Davis, Esq., Agency Counsel (via Zoom) Charlie Breuer, Twin Ponds HB, LLC, Managing Member Brody Smith, Twin Ponds HB, LLC, Counsel Approval of Meeting Minutes: April 9, 2026 Upon motion by Mark Muthumbi, seconded by Alan Marzullo, the Board approved the Regular meeting minutes of April 9, 2026. Motion was carried.
Treasurer’s Report:
Nate Stevens gave a brief overview of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of April 2026. Upon motion by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Mark Muthumbi, the Board approved the Treasurer’s Report for the month of April 2026. Motion was carried.
Payment of Bills:
Upon motion by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Mark Muthumbi, the Board approved the Payment of Bills. Motion was carried.
Action Items:
The applicant is proposing to construct a residential community consisting of approximately 309 multifamily units, a commercial space, and recreational areas in the Town of Manlius. Specific project amenities will include a well-equipped fitness center, a children’s play area, a dog park, a new dock, and a covered pavilion.
Brody Smith, attorney at Bond Schoeneck & King who represents Twin Ponds HB, LLC made the following comments:
The applicant proposes to construct a residential community consisting of 309 multifamily units as well as 5,700 sq. ft. of commercial space. In addition to that, there will be recreational areas associated with the ponds on the property. Most of the units will be in three five-story buildings except for five apartments being above the commercial space in a separate building. Amenities are to include a fitness center inside of a clubhouse, a children’s play area, a dog park, a dock at the ponds for non-motorized watercrafts and fishing, and a covered pavilion adjacent to the ponds.
In addition to these amenities, the community will be surrounded by hiking trails, which will be able to connect two areas that are not currently linked by pedestrian paths. Limestone Creek to the east of the development can connect to the Erie Canalway Trail, where the Town and Village have expressed interest in having a connection. To the west of the development, you would make your way to the Town Center Retirement Community, Northeast Medical, and then to the southwest, you’d find the Town Center with retail and restaurants. The location is a 54-acre site at 5440 North Burdick St. The land is currently unimproved. There were once two quarries on the parcel that were then filled with water to create the twin ponds. Over the years there have been many attempts to develop the property but development was not able to come to fruition for reasons such as the property being incumbered by slopes, wetlands, a lack of usable space on the property, which was a challenge regarding the Town of Manlius zoning codes. This was overcome by the new Planned Unit Development (PUD) law that was developed. On November 1, 2023, the Town Board adopted a District Plan, a zoning amendment, that allowed this project to move forward. The site plan was approved by the Town Board on August 26, 2024, after an extensive environmental review, including a review of environmental impacts, delineation of wetlands, preparation of a traffic study, and preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan. Onondaga County Planning supported the project and gave input on the project, ultimately leading to the Town adopting the project.
There are five major points of this project. The first being project economics. The project costs will be $114 million resulting in a community investment of over $126 million. If the project doesn’t move forward on the existing plot of land, it would collect $172,000 in taxes over 10 years, whereas if the project does move forward it will collect $2,972,000 in the same time period. Additionally, the project will create 140 construction jobs that will begin as early as late 2026 and last two years. There will be seven full-time jobs as a result of the project, but this is a conservative number. This project will not proceed under the current lending environment and rapidly increasing construction costs without the tax incentives proposed to the Board for approval.
The second point is that there is a need for housing. The Manlius Town Board was specific in their letter of support claiming that there is an urgent need for more apartments in particular in their community. Previous zoning patterns in the Town of Manlius have blocked this type of project in the past. The applicant included an updated housing study that defines the need for more apartment units in the Town, in the eastern suburbs of the County specifically. The number of available apartment units in the eastern suburbs out of the 14 complexes was 0 at the time of the study. In the northern suburbs there were over 3,100 total apartment units, and only six were available at the time. This process was completed over three months and the findings were consistent. The Town of Manlius acknowledges the need, having stated this need before and adjusting their zoning code accordingly.
The third point is in regard to the Onondaga County Comprehensive Plan, which calls out a need for this type of housing. There is a shortage of units in the overall County. The County’s Comprehensive Plan states, “Today’s housing needs have changed dramatically due in large part to fewer households with children, fewer married household, and an aging population overall. There’s an increasing demand for apartments and attached units on small lots in more walkable neighborhoods. Shifts in housing size, makeup, lifestyle preference, declining/willingness/ability to own a home, and available inventory have led to an increase in demand for apartment units over detached owner-occupied homes.” This site is conveniently located in close proximity to shops and dining, allowing residents to easily walk to these areas in addition to the amenities provided such as the ponds, hiking trails, and Erie Canalway Trail system. According to the applicant, these characteristics match what was put forward in the Onondaga County Comprehensive Plan.
The fourth point is that this development is the type of project that the Agency’s UTEP was amended to align with. This project is infill, which doesn’t need a substantial update of existing infrastructure. The project site is surrounded by retail, senior housing, and a medical complex. Additionally, the site is not in close proximity to single family residential neighborhoods, which would avoid any negative impacts that typically hinder this kind of development.
The fifth point is that outdoor recreation is a huge opportunity for this project. It has the potential to provide ample outdoor activities such as hiking trails. The project is situated to not only be an advantage to new residents, but also existing residents in the Village and residents at the senior living complexes. The trail connections were made a part of the planning improvement in the district planning conditions proposed by the Town, where the developer agreed to connect the trailways. The project is sustainable, including chargers for electric vehicles, and will utilize electric over gas for appliances and heating, as well as special accommodations that go above the Agency’s requirements because of planning conditions that were agreed to regarding units set aside for people with severe disabilities. Referring to the Agency’s UTEP, B. Smith pointed out six points to think about while evaluating a project: is the housing fulfilling an unmet need in the area, is there an applicable market study documenting the need for such housing, is the project aligned with the Plan Onondaga County Comprehensive Plan, is it infill, is any additional infrastructure needed to service this project, and is the project apart of a large mixed-use development. B. Smith relayed that this project meets all those standards.
Sally Santangelo asked how many units will be set aside for individuals with physical disabilities.
B. Smith responded that all of the units will be ADA-compliant, but in addition to that, the Planning Board and the Town identified that there is a benefit to having a certain number of units that are specifically designed for people with unique disabilities, above and beyond what the ADA accommodates. Conditions within the project’s zone change state that the owner shall convert no less than one apartment per 100 to be handicap accessible for persons with disabilities, wheelchair, vision, and hearing, as needed. There will be at least three units that will meet these standards, and the units will be modified to accommodate the individuals who will be applying for them.
Alexis Rodriguez noted that there was a public hearing held for the project on April 29, 2026. Seven spoke in favor of the Agency’s proposed financial assistance. One of the participants who spoke in favor was Sara Bollinger, Town of Manlius Supervisor. The school district was also in attendance but did not make comments regarding the financial assistance. There were two individuals who spoke in opposition to the proposed financial assistance.
Alan Marzullo stated that it’s important to note that in the descent that the Board is required to only look at projects that are related to industrial, that’s not true. When you start looking at guiding community development and housing, that’s a job that this Board needs to do and take into account. Hearing what Brody Smith had to share, we know that the County is in deep need of housing. For all those reasons, I would move to make a motion.
Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board to authorize
adoption of SEQRA determination.” Motion was made by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Mark
Muthumbi. Motion was carried.
Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes, sales and use taxes and mortgage
recording taxes.” Motion was made by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Michael Greene.
Motion was carried.
EH 26, LLC has requested the execution and delivery of a mortgage and related documents with respect to a refinancing.
Amanda Fitzgerald stated that this is an administrative action. In order to provide financial assistance to projects, the IDA nominally steps into title. This project is a PILOT that was approved in 2016 in the City of Syracuse (Embassy Suites Hotel). It was formerly a Destiny project, but a few years ago it was assigned to EH26, LLC. EH26, LLC is refinancing and is asking for consent to refinance. The IDA is required to join the lender documents due to being nominally in title. Before the IDA joins the documents, Council will review them to ensure that they have the appropriate indemnification and hold harmless language that is necessary.
Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board authorizing
execution and delivery of documents.” Motion was made by Sally Santangelo, seconded by
Christina Hollenback. Motion was carried.
Motion to adjourn was made by Alan Marzullo and seconded by Sally Santangelo at 8:50 AM.
___________________________________ Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary May 31, 2026 Revenue / Expense / Income Current Period Current YTD Operating/Non-Op Revenue 152,769 11,369,444 Administrative Expense 76,814 358,435 Operating/Program Expense 91,910 690,512 Net Ordinary Income (15,955) 10,320,496 Current Assets Current YTD Total Cash 46,026,401 Escrow Accounts 96,762 Net Cash 45,929,639 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Statement of Activity May 1-31, 2026
Revenue
2116.1 Agency Fees 2,500.00 Total for 2116 Fees $2,500.00 2410 Lease Income 12,901.06 Total for 500 Operating Revenue $15,401.06
2401 Interest Income 25,803.96 2405 WPCP Savings - Interest Income 31,008.94 2406 WPCP Phase 1 Improvements - Interest 36,511.67 2407 WPCP Phase 2 Improvements - Interest 44,043.41 Total for 501 Non-Operating Revenue $137,367.98 Total for Revenue $152,769.04 Gross Profit $152,769.04 Expenditures
6406.50 Consulting Services 3,000.00 Total for 6406 Other Professional Services $3,000.00 6407 Administrative Expense 76,813.87 6409 Conference Attendence 353.97 6410 Office Expense 1,483.30 Total for 6400 Operating Expense $81,651.14
6460 IDA General Legal 677.00 6480 Roth Legal 1,742.50 Total for 6450 Barclay Damon $2,419.50 Total for 6440 Legal Fees $2,419.50
6510.3 Legal 1,206.00 Total for 6510 White Pine Commerce Park $1,206.00 6540 3649 Erie Blvd E 6540.3 Insurance 20,704.50 6540.4 Maintenance 950.00 6540.5 Legal 16,327.75 Total for 6540 3649 Erie Blvd E $37,982.25 Total for 6500 Agency Program Expenses $39,188.25 Accrual Basis Monday, June 01, 2026 06:09 PM GMTZ 1/2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Statement of Activity May 1-31, 2026
6514.1 Legal 19,632.42 6514.2 Engineering 2,188.50 6514.7 WPSTP - Marketing 23,643.86 Total for 6514 White Pine Science & Technology Park $45,464.78
6610.6 Barton & Loguidice 28,682.00 6610.7 Gorick Construction 410,400.00 Total for 6610 WPCP Pass Thru Expenses $439,082.00 Total for Expenditures $607,805.67 Net Operating Revenue -$455,036.63 Net Revenue -$455,036.63 Accrual Basis Monday, June 01, 2026 06:09 PM GMTZ 2/2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Statement of Financial Position As of May 31, 2026
Assets Current Assets Bank Accounts 200.6 NBT OCIDA Savings 7,559,849.34 200.7 NBT - WPCP Savings 10,082,094.65 200.8 NBT - WPCP Phase 1 Improvements 12,283,722.13 200.9 NBT - WPCP Phase 2 Improvements 15,053,970.71 200 Cash $0.00 200.5 NBT Checking 1,046,764.08 Total for 200 Cash $1,046,764.08 Total for Bank Accounts $46,026,400.91 Accounts Receivable 380 Accounts Rec.
380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 331,319.51 Total for 380 Accounts Rec. $331,319.51 Total for Accounts Receivable $331,319.51 Total for Current Assets $46,357,720.42 Fixed Assets
105 3649 Erie Blvd East 16,117,318.46 107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42 108 White Pine Science & Technology Park 2,140,557.00 Total for 100 Land $18,862,715.88 250 Investment in Real Property 3,082,772.87 Total for Fixed Assets $21,945,488.75 Total for Assets $68,303,209.17 Liabilities and Equity Liabilities Current Liabilities Other Current Liabilities 600 Accounts Payable $0.00 600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 233,801.21 600.3 Onondaga County Loan $28,079,656.77 600.31 Accrued Interest - OC Note Payable 3,095,059.00 Total for 600.3 Onondaga County Loan $31,174,715.77 600.4 Micron Deposit 96,761.54 Total for 600 Accounts Payable $31,505,278.52 Total for Other Current Liabilities $31,505,278.52 Total for Current Liabilities $31,505,278.52 Accrual Basis Monday, June 01, 2026 06:10 PM GMTZ 1/2 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Statement of Financial Position As of May 31, 2026
Long-term Liabilities 600.5 Onondaga County Loan - Non WPCP 13,577,147.96 Total for Long-term Liabilities $13,577,147.96 Total for Liabilities $45,082,426.48 Equity 3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 5,277,648.00 3900 Equity Unreserved 8,119,894.18 Net Revenue 9,823,240.51 Total for Equity $23,220,782.69 Total for Liabilities and Equity $68,303,209.17 Accrual Basis Monday, June 01, 2026 06:10 PM GMTZ 2/2
PAYMENT OF BILLS - SCHEDULE #517 June 4, 2026
1. DRYDEN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. $ 1,661.20 Insurance Premium, Inv #S4 2. SELECTIVE $ 20,698.00 Insurance Payment #3 - 3649 Erie Blvd 3. JMT OF NEW YORK, LLP $ 10,908.00 Roth Steel, Inv #1-106961 4. GORICK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. $ 21,600.00 WPCP Demolition Retainage - Inv#23449 5. ONONDAGA COUNTY $ 10,000,000.00 Partial Loan Repayment - per Terms of Promissory Note 6. GROSSMAN ST. AMOUR $ 17,200.00
7. ONONDAGA COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY $ 151.73
8. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 720.00 Retained Corporate & Public Finance Matters - Inv #5392276 9. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 21,786.40 Neighbors for a Better Micron - Inv #5392272 10. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 14,485.26 WPSTP - Inv #5392275 11. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 14,512.97 OCIDA - Shoppingtown - Inv #5392274 12. LOVELL AND ASSOCIATES $ 3,000.00 May 2026 Consulting 13. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 1,582.50 Roth Steel - Inv #5392277 14. ABC CREATIVE $ 10,920.00 Inv #8987 - Agency Services 15. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 23,337.51 Micron Financial Assistance - February 2026 16. BOND SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC 919.28 Inv #20132705 - Tessy Elbridge Resolution 17. ASSOCIATED REPORTERS INTERNATIONAL INC. $ 620.00 WPSTP Public Hearing - 4/30/2026 18. ROBERT PETROVICH $ 114.99 Mileage 19. NANCY LOWERY $ 141.06 Mileage 20. NATHANIEL STEVENS $ 114.99 Mileage 21. ALEXIS RODRIGUEZ $ 141.06 Mileage 22. EVAN CARTER $ 141.06 Mileage 22. ROBERT SCHOENECK $ 114.99 Mileage TOTAL $ 10,164,871.00
Project: Jordan Landing LLC Project Number: 3101-25-07A
Location: 577 Peru Road School District: Jordan-Elbridge Project Type: New Construction, Housing Tax Parcel(s): 006.1-01-03.1; 006.1-01-04.1; 006.1-01-05.0 Village: Jordan Total Project Cost: $ 31,974,380 8. Total Jobs 5 Land Acquisition $ 200,000 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work/Demo $ 3,051,000 8B: Job Creation 5 Building Construction & Renovation $ 19,289,831 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ 25,000 Project Soft Cost $ 9,408,549 Community Investment /Abatement Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Abatement Summary $744,300 Sales Tax Abatement $0 Mortgage Tax Abatement $0 Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $744,300 The applicant is proposing to construct 65 mixed-income housing units on Community Investment $37,882,355 approximately 7.84 vacant acres of land adjacent to the Erie Canal Trail in the Village PILOT Payments $753,338 of Jordan. 30 units will be integrated supportive units for homeless veterans and Project Salaries and Benefits Estimated (10 yrs) $3,306,816 individuals with Serious Mental Illness (SMI). Construction Benefit Estimate $1,847,822 Total Project Cost $31,974,380 Investment:Abatement Ratio 50.90 :1 © 2026 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency. All rights reserved.
Jordan Landing LLC A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet for 13 years OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 37,950 Projected investment $ 19,289,831 OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 3,562,050 OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 3,600,000 Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 15,788 Scheduled PILOT payments $ 753,338 Full Tax County PILOT School PILOT YEAR Exemption % Town Village Total PILOT Payment w/o Net Exemption Amount District
1 100% $ 116 $ 114 $ 640 $ 205 $ 1,075.42 $ 102,017 $ 100,941 2 60% $ 4,546 $ 4,494 $ 25,175 $ 8,066 $ 42,280.93 $ 104,057 $ 61,776 3 60% $ 4,637 $ 4,584 $ 25,679 $ 8,227 $ 43,126.55 $ 106,138 $ 63,012 4 60% $ 4,729 $ 4,676 $ 26,192 $ 8,392 $ 43,989.08 $ 108,261 $ 64,272 5 60% $ 4,824 $ 4,769 $ 26,716 $ 8,560 $ 44,868.86 $ 110,426 $ 65,557 6 55% $ 5,519 $ 5,457 $ 30,568 $ 9,794 $ 51,338.60 $ 112,635 $ 61,296 7 55% $ 5,630 $ 5,566 $ 31,180 $ 9,990 $ 52,365.37 $ 114,887 $ 62,522 8 55% $ 5,742 $ 5,677 $ 31,803 $ 10,189 $ 53,412.68 $ 117,185 $ 63,772 9 45% $ 7,129 $ 7,048 $ 39,481 $ 12,649 $ 66,307.80 $ 119,529 $ 53,221 10 45% $ 7,271 $ 7,189 $ 40,271 $ 12,902 $ 67,633.96 $ 121,919 $ 54,285 11 35% $ 8,740 $ 8,641 $ 48,403 $ 15,508 $ 81,291.31 $ 124,358 $ 43,066 12 25% $ 10,264 $ 10,148 $ 56,844 $ 18,212 $ 95,467.90 $ 126,845 $ 31,377 13 15% $ 11,845 $ 11,711 $ 65,603 $ 21,019 $ 110,179.04 $ 129,382 $ 19,203 TOTAL $ 80,992 $ 80,075 $ 448,557 $ 143,713 $ 753,338 $ 1,497,637 $ 744,300 Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Jobs Current/Actuals Creation Goals 5 Total Employment Goals 0 5 5 5 5 5 © 2026 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency. All rights reserved.
Jordan Landing Proposed Organizational Chart Jordan Landing Housing Development Fund Corporation Jordan Landing LLC New York Housing Development Fund Nominee Agreement New York Limited Liability Company Corporation Beneficial Owner Nominee Owner/Fee Title Holder Eagle Star Housing Inc. Jordan Landing Managers LLC To be Formed Investor LLC New York not-for-profit Managing Member Investor Member corporation .01% 99.99% 100% Member Eagle Star Housing, Inc. Jordan Developers LLC Tax Credit Investor New York not-for-profit New York for-profit New York for-profit corporation corporation corporation 51% Member 49% Member 100% Member Rock PMC Rockabill Development LLC New York for-profit New York for-profit corporation corporation 51% Member 49% Member
Agency Board Members Randy Wolken Alan Marzullo Mark Muthumbi Deka Eysaman Christina Hollenback Sally Santangelo Michael Greene Agency Officers/Staff Robert M. Petrovich, Executive Director Nathaniel Stevens, Treasurer Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary Evan Carter, Assistant Secretary Robert Schoneck, Assistant Treasurer Agency Legal Counsel & Auditor Jeffrey Davis, Esq., Barclay Damon LLP Amanda Fitzgerald, Esq., Barclay Damon LLP Michael Lisson, CPA, Grossman St. Amour CPAs, PLLC The Applicant(s) has received a list of members, officers and staff of the Agency. To the best of my knowledge, no member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect, in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described: If there are two applicants (Real Estate Holding and Operating Company) both need to complete this page.
Name of Applicant(s) Company _________________________________ Jordan Landing LLC Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Patrick Rock Digitally signed by Patrick Rock Date: 2026.05.19 14:11:36 -04'00' Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________ Patrick Rock, GP Date: ______________
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 37 of 242 Page 19 Section I: C) 4.Has the Applicant/Owner received assistance from Onondaga County Industrial DevelopmentAgency (OCIDA, Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (SIDA), New York State or theOnondaga Civic Development Corporation (OCDC) in the past? Below is a list of housing developments completed by the Applicant's affiliated entities # of # of Housing Completion Project Name Project Address Buildings Units Date Government Funding Programs Paddock's Landing 116 State Street, Phoenix, NY 13135 1 32 4/6/1983 USDA Rural Development 515 Village Center 456 Main Street, Phoenix, NY 13135 1 15 6/1/1984 USDA Rural Development 515 Bradley Associates 56 Davis Street, Phoenix, NY 13135 2 24 6/27/1986 USDA Rural Development 515 Christopher Court 22 Maplehurst, Phoenix, NY 13135 5 40 4/30/1992 USDA Rural Development 515 Patrick Court 32 Maplehurst, Phoenix, NY 13135 2 24 12/16/1993 USDA Rural Development 515 Austin Court 42 Maplehurst, Phoenix, NY 13135 2 24 6/6/1998 USDA Rural Development 515 and New York State Old Erie Place I 20 North Beaver Street, Jordan, NY 130 1 24 9/26/1986 USDA Rural Development 515 Old Erie Place II 20 North Beaver Street, Jordan, NY 130 1 24 12/19/1986 USDA Rural Development 515 Old Erie Place III 20 North Beaver Street, Jordan, NY 130 1 24 2/14/1994 USDA Rural Development 515 Old Erie Place IV 20 North Beaver Street, Jordan, NY 130 1 24 1/8/2002 USDA Rural Development 515 and New York State Wolcott Meadows I 6032 Alport Street, Wolcott, NY 14590 5 40 11/8/1988 USDA Rural Development 515 and New York State Wolcott Meadows II 6032 Alport Street, Wolcott, NY 14590 1 30 12/4/1994 USDA Rural Development 515 and New York State Union Free School 23 First Street, Camillus, NY 13031 1 27 12/10/1993 New York State Housing Trust Fund Minetto Senior Housing12 Schuyler Street, Oswego, NY 13126 1 39 1/9/2002 New York State Housing Trust Fund
A statement that the Project described in this application would not be undertaken but for the financial assistance provided by the Agency.
The PILOT agreement from the IDA is necessary for the Project to move forward. The real estate tax burden projected in year one is over $107,000. An amount that is unsustainable without a drastic change to the rents making the project no longer affordable. A PILOT also provides comfort to the investors, lenders and the State of New York, who are unlikely to invest without a stable PILOT Payment. For the project to provide affordable rents targeting low and moderate income families and veterans a PILOT is critical.
E. Project Description Jordan Landing:
• Overview of the Development Jordan Landing is a thoughtfully designed, infill new construction development located in the Village of Jordan, Onondaga County, NY. Situated on 7.84 acres of vacant land (parcels 006.1-01-03.1, 006.1-01-04.1, and 006.1-01-05) adjacent to the Erie Canal Trail, this project will bring 65 units of mixed-income housing across nine two-story buildings. It is a response to pressing regional housing needs, offering high-quality, energy-efficient homes for working families and individuals—30 of which will be integrated supportive units for homeless veterans and individuals with Serious Mental Illness (SMI).
The project received zoning support from the Village of Jordan in early 2025 and has since secured site plan approval, along with $250,000 in capital funding from OCHIP.
The development’s design promotes mixed-income housing through income averaging, with units spanning 30%, 50%, 60%, and 70% of Area Median Income (AMI). The breakdown includes 35 one-bedroom, 16 two-bedroom, and 14 three-bedroom units, distributed across both townhouse and multifamily buildings. The multifamily building includes shared amenities: a community room, fitness area, service offices, and laundry facilities—all accessible to every resident. Below is a breakdown of units by bedroom type and AMI:
Bedroom Total 30% 50% 60% 70% Size Units AMI AMI AMI AMI
Total 65 7 29 16 13 % of Total 100% 11% 44.5% 24.5% 20% The total square footage of the project is 74,203.
• Supportive Housing Component Eagle Star Housing, a nonprofit service provider founded in 2012, leads the supportive housing component. Their mission to serve veterans facing homelessness aligns closely with the state's priorities. They have secured an award for 30 ESSHI-supported units (15 for homeless veterans, 15 for individuals with SMI). Eagle Star will provide direct services on-site, including mental health support, case management, transportation, and resident programming. Services will be 1 led by a highly qualified House Manager with a Master of Social Work and significant experience, ensuring the program meets the complex needs of the target population.
This integrated approach not only helps vulnerable individuals remain stably housed but also contributes to reducing regional homelessness. Recent Point-in-Time data shows homelessness in the NY-505 region increased by over 25% in the last year alone, with Onondaga County now accounting for 64% of the area’s homeless population.
• Design, Sustainability, and Community Integration Jordan Landing incorporates sustainable design and green building practices to meet New York State Homes and Community Renewal (HCR)’s 2025 sustainability guidelines. The project will meet Enterprise Green Communities 2020 Plus standards and conduct HVAC commissioning to ensure long-term energy efficiency.
Each building is two stories and wood-frame construction. The buildings are sited to avoid any disturbance to nearby DEC and USACE-regulated wetlands, although minor grading in the 100- foot buffer will be permitted under a forthcoming NYSDEC permit. The surrounding landscape, including a nearby forested wetland and the Erie Canal Trail, will offer residents access to nature and recreation. A central playground, walkable sidewalks, and adjacent public spaces further enhance the community-oriented design.
• Location and Market Fit Jordan Landing is well-positioned within commuting distance of several regional employment hubs, including the forthcoming Micron Facility in Clay (30 minutes away), Downtown Syracuse (30 minutes), and Auburn (20 minutes). Though public transit is limited, Eagle Star will provide transportation services for supportive housing residents, and Onondaga County’s Dial-a-Ride program offers transit options for seniors and people with disabilities.
Market conditions strongly support the development. Adjacent affordable housing—developed and managed by Rock PMC—remains fully occupied with long waiting lists. A recent market study found a favorable 10.44% capture rate and underscored stable rents and minimal vacancy in both market-rate and affordable housing sectors. With a rising population of people experiencing homelessness, especially veterans and individuals with SMI, Jordan Landing is a timely and much-needed intervention.
• Site, Zoning, and Environmental Considerations The Project Site was made up of three parcels: # 006.1-01-03.1, 006.1-01-04.1, and 006.1-01- 05.0. At the August 20th Planning Board Meeting the Board passed a resolution consolidating these lots into one parcel which is expected to retain the 006.1-01-03.1 SBL number and has been confirmed to be addressed as 577 Peru Road. The Village of Jordan Planning Board 2 granted final site plan approval in August 2025. The land is free of environmental hazards, and any work near the wetlands will proceed under proper permitting.
• Development Team and Financing This collaborative effort brings together trusted partners:
• Eagle Star Housing (Applicant, majority owner, service provider) • Rock PMC (Property Manager, municipal approvals lead) • Rockabill Development (Financing, construction closing, and coordination) • Bowes REDC (Predevelopment consultant) • Libolt & Sons / AHC (General Contractor) • Holmes King Kallquist (Architect) • Canon Heyman & Weiss (Legal counsel) Financing sources include:
• 9% State and Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits • NYS Supportive Housing Opportunity Program Funds • $250,000 from OCHIP • Equity from Key Bank (tax credit investor and lender) • Deferred Developer Fee from Project Developers Timeline and Readiness Jordan Landing is development-ready. Key milestones are as follows:
• March 2026 – HCR Awards • August 2026 – Financial closing and construction start • March 2028 – Construction completion and lease-up begins • September 2028 – Full occupancy • December 2028 – Permanent closing The only outstanding municipal item is a building permit, expected within 4–6 weeks of application. The NYSDEC permit process for minor grading in the buffer zone will be underway in fall 2025, with approvals anticipated within five months.
3
Attached please find a letter from the Village of Jordan outlining the approvals received as well as the SEQR. Please note that the total acreage of the property is 7.84 and the total square footage of the buildings is 74,203. Attached is a survey, site plans and building plans.
Agency Use Only [If applicable] Full Environmental Assessment Form Project : Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date : Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency=s reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment.
Tips for completing Part 2:
• Review all of the information provided in Part 1.
• Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2.
• If you answer “Yes” to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer “No” to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact.
• Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box “Moderate to large impact may occur.” • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis.
• If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook.
• When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the Awhole action@. • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project.
Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, NO YES ✔ the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 2.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d 9 ✔ 9 less than 3 feet.
b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f 9 ✔ 9 c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or E2a 9 ✔ 9 generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface.
d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a 9 ✔ 9 of natural material.
e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year D1e 9 ✔ 9 or in multiple phases.
f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical D2e, D2q 9 ✔ 9 disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides).
g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B1i 9 ✔ 9 h. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ 9 9 ___________________________________________________________________ Page 50 of 242 FEAF 2019
The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, NO ✔ YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, move on to Section 3.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: ________________________________ E2g 9 9 ___________________________________________________________________ b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c 9 9 registered National Natural Landmark.
Specific feature: _____________________________________________________ c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 ___________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water ✔ NO YES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) If “Yes”, answer questions a - l. If “No”, move on to Section 4.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, D1h 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a D2b 9 9 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water.
c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a 9 9 from a wetland or water body.
d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h 9 9 tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body.
e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, D2a, D2h 9 9 runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments.
f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal D2c 9 9 of water from surface water.
g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge D2d 9 9 of wastewater to surface water(s).
h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e 9 9 stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies.
i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h 9 9 downstream of the site of the proposed action.
j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q, E2h 9 9 around any water body.
k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, D1a, D2d 9 9 wastewater treatment facilities.
l. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ 9 9 ___________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or ✔ NO YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer.
(See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 5.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand D2c 9 9 on supplies from existing water supply wells.
b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c 9 9 withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer.
Cite Source: ________________________________________________________ c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and D1a, D2c 9 9 sewer services.
d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E2l 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c, E1f, 9 9 where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. E1g, E1h f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products D2p, E2l 9 9 over ground water or an aquifer.
g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 E2h, D2q, 9 9 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2l, D2c h. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. NO ✔ YES (See Part 1. E.2) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, move on to Section 6.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j 9 9 c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k 9 9 d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage D2b, D2e 9 9 patterns.
e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, 9 9 E2j, E2k f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, E1e 9 9 or upgrade?
g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. ✔ NO YES (See Part 1. D.2.f., D.2.h, D.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, move on to Section 7.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels:
i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) D2g 9 9 ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N2O) D2g 9 9 iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) D2g 9 9 iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) D2g 9 9 D2g 9 9 v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of hydrochloroflourocarbons (HFCs) emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2h 9 9 b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g 9 9 hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants.
c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions D2f, D2g 9 9 rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU=s per hour.
d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in “a” through “c”, D2g 9 9 above.
e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s 9 9 ton of refuse per hour.
f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.) NO ✔ YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 8.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E2o 9 9 threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site.
b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2o 9 9 any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government.
c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p 9 9 species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site.
d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p 9 9 any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government.
e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural E3c 9 9 Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect.
f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any E2n 9 9 portion of a designated significant natural community.
Source: ____________________________________________________________ g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or E2m 9 9 over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, 9 9 E1b grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat.
Habitat type & information source: ______________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of D2q 9 9 herbicides or pesticides.
j. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) ✔ NO YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 9.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c, E3b 9 9 NYS Land Classification System.
b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land E1a, Elb 9 9 (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc).
c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b 9 9 active agricultural land.
d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural E1b, E3a 9 9 uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District.
e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a, E1b 9 9 management system.
f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development C2c, C3, 9 9 potential or pressure on farmland. D2c, D2d g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c 9 9 Protection Plan.
h. Other impacts: ________________________________________________________ 9 9
The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in ✔ NO YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.1.b, E.3.h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 10.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local E3h 9 9 scenic or aesthetic resource.
b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant E3h, C2b 9 9 screening of one or more officially designated scenic views.
c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) 9 9 ii. Year round 9 9 d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h action is:
E2q, i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work 9 9 ii. Recreational or tourism based activities E1c 9 9 e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h 9 9 appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource.
f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed D1a, E1a, 9 9 project: D1f, D1g 0-1/2 mile ½ -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological NO ✔ YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 11.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on the National or E3e 9 9 State Register of Historical Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places.
b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f 9 9 to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory.
c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g 9 9 to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory.
Source: ____________________________________________________________ d. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________ If any of the above (a-d) are answered “Moderate to large impact may e. occur”, continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3: i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e, E3g, 9 9 of the site or property. E3f ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property’s setting or E3e, E3f, 9 9 integrity. E3g, E1a, E1b iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e, E3f, 9 9 are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3g, E3h,
The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a NO ✔ YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan.
(See Part 1. C.2.c, E.1.c., E.2.q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 12.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or “ecosystem D2e, E1b 9 9 services”, provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater E2h, storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, E2o, E2n, E2p b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, E1c, 9 9 C2c, E2q c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c 9 9 with few such resources. E1c, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c, E1c 9 9 community as an open space resource.
e. Other impacts: _____________________________________________________ 9 9 _________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical NO ✔ YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, go to Section 13.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or E3d 9 9 characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA.
b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d 9 9 characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA.
c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. ✔ NO YES (See Part 1. D.2.j) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 14.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j 9 9 more vehicles.
c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j 9 9 d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j 9 9 e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j 9 9 f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. NO ✔ YES (See Part 1. D.2.k) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 15.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k 9 9 b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission D1f, 9 9 or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a D1q, D2k commercial or industrial use.
c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k 9 9 d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square D1g 9 9 feet of building area when completed.
e. Other Impacts: ________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. NO ✔ YES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 16.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m 9 9 regulation.
b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, E1d 9 9 hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home.
c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o 9 9 d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing D2n, E1a 9 9 area conditions.
f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________
The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure ✔ NO YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - m. If “No”, go to Section 17.
Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may cccur occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day E1d 9 9 care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community.
b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. E1g, E1h 9 9 c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site E1g, E1h 9 9 remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action.
d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the E1g, E1h 9 9 property (e.g., easement or deed restriction).
e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place E1g, E1h 9 9 to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health.
f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t 9 9 generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health.
g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, E1f 9 9 management facility.
h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, E1f 9 9 i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of D2r, D2s 9 9 solid waste.
j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of E1f, E1g 9 9 a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. E1h k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill E1f, E1g 9 9 site to adjacent off site structures.
l. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the D2s, E1f, 9 9 project site. D2r m. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________
The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. NO ✔ YES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, go to Section 18.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action’s land use components may be different from, or in sharp C2, C3, D1a 9 9 contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). E1a, E1b b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village C2 9 9 in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%.
c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 9 9 d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use C2, C2 9 9 plans.
e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3, D1c, 9 9 supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. D1d, D1f, D1d, Elb f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4, D2c, D2d 9 9 that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or C2a 9 9 commercial development not included in the proposed action) h. Other: _____________________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________
The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. NO ✔ YES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas E3e, E3f, E3g 9 9 of historic importance to the community.
b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 9 9 schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2, C3, D1f 9 9 there is a shortage of such housing. D1g, E1a d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 9 9 or designated public resources.
e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2, C3 9 9 character.
f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 9 9 E1a, E1b E2g, E2h g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________ PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10
PHONE: (315) 445-7980
0 125 250 375 CONSTRUCTION
REV DATE : DRAWN DESCRIPTION : No : BY : 1 6/4/25 JPR MISC. REVISIONS 2 7/2/25 JPR BUS PARKING AREA
ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. JOB NO: 25014 DATE: 05/07/2025 DRAWN BY: JPR CHECKED BY: EGK SCALE: AS SHOWN
DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT. ANY SUCH ALTERATIONS SHALL BE NOTED, SEALED, AND SIGNED BY THE ALTERING ARCHITECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF PART 69.5(b). PART 69.5(b) OF THE TITLE VIII EDUCATION LAW OF NEW YORK PROHIBITS ANY AND ALL ALTERATIONS TO THIS DRAWING OR DOCUMENT BY ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE
Fax: (315) 476 - 5420 & Associates, Architects, LLP www.hkkarchitects.com
Ph: (315) 476 - 8371
8/28/2025 5:40:47 PM C:\Users\clounsbery\Documents\revit files\R25_25014_Jordan Landing_central_20250821_clounsbery.rvt
1A
BUILDING - 1C BUILDING - 1D BUILDING - 1E SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
NO.:
REV.
NEW CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING 4A DATE:
BY:
DRAWN BY: & Associates, Architects, LLP JOB NO: 25014 DATE: 05/06/2025
DESCRIPTION:
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
Author Ph: (315) 476 - 8371 Fax: (315) 476 - 5420
ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.
www.hkkarchitects.com BUILDING 4A PART 69.5(b) OF THE TITLE VIII EDUCATION LAW OF NEW YORK PROHIBITS ANY AND ALL ALTERATIONS TO THIS DRAWING OR DOCUMENT BY ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT. ANY SUCH ALTERATIONS SHALL BE NOTED, SEALED, AND SIGNED BY THE ALTERING ARCHITECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF PART 69.5( b).
1. Describe the reasons why the Agency’s financial assistance is necessary. Describe how the project would be impacted if these benefits were not provided. {Section II (D) A Payment In Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) agreement is critical to the financial feasibility and long-term stability of Jordan Landing. The project’s operating budget demonstrates that real estate taxes represent one of the largest ongoing expenses, beginning at $107,000 in Year 1 and escalating annually by 2%. Even with modest tax growth, total operating costs exceed $580,000 in the first year, producing an income-to-expense ratio of only 1.04—barely above the minimum threshold for sustainable operations. This narrow margin leaves limited flexibility to address increases in utilities, insurance, and maintenance costs, which have risen sharply across the affordable housing sector.
Without a PILOT agreement to moderate property tax levels, the project’s annual debt coverage ratio would fall below the 1.15–1.20 range required by lenders and investors, making permanent financing unattainable. The result would be a project that cannot move forward in its intended form— jeopardizing 65 new units of affordable and supportive housing in a community that has demonstrated significant unmet demand and 100% occupancy in comparable properties.
A PILOT is not simply a financial convenience; it is a core component of the project’s capital and operating strategy. The development’s rents are restricted to serve households between 30% and 70% of Area Median Income, with 30 of the 65 units dedicated to supportive housing for homeless veterans and individuals with serious mental illness. These deeply affordable units produce lower operating revenue but are essential to addressing regional housing and homelessness priorities. A full property tax burden—calculated at market valuation rather than restricted-income valuation—would consume scarce operating funds that must otherwise support resident services, maintenance, and long-term reserve contributions.
A structured PILOT provides a predictable and sustainable tax framework that balances community benefit with fiscal responsibility. It ensures that Jordan Landing contributes to local tax revenues at a reasonable rate while preserving sufficient cash flow to operate safely, maintain quality, and deliver ongoing supportive services. With a PILOT, the project can maintain a Debt Coverage Ratio of approximately 1.17 and modest but stable annual cash flow of around $34,000, ensuring financial viability without rent increases or service reductions.
Without this PILOT, the project would likely face a cascading series of consequences: higher rents that undermine affordability targets, reduction or elimination of supportive units, or deferral of critical maintenance. Each of these outcomes would erode the long-term community value that the project is designed to deliver.
By granting a PILOT, the Agency directly supports the creation of new, high-quality affordable housing that aligns with Plan Onondaga’s priorities—revitalizing village centers, expanding housing choice, and serving vulnerable populations—while ensuring that the project remains financially sound for decades 1 to come. The PILOT is therefore not only beneficial but indispensable to realizing the full social, economic, and policy benefits of Jordan Landing.
2. Describe how the proposed housing project fulfills an unmet need in the community. Please provide a market study documenting a need for the proposed project.
Jordan Landing directly responds to a well-documented shortage of affordable and supportive housing in Onondaga County and the Central New York region. The preliminary market study prepared for this project demonstrates a capture rate of only 10.44%, confirming that there is more than sufficient demand to absorb the proposed 65 mixed-income units. In nearby comparable developments, including the sponsor’s 90-unit Old Erie Place community, occupancy remains at 100% with a substantial waiting list, underscoring the lack of available, high-quality affordable housing options for working families and individuals in the area.
The demand for supportive housing is equally urgent. The 2024 Point-in-Time Count documents a sharp rise in homelessness in Onondaga County—from 598 individuals in 2023 to 760 in 2024, with similar increases among veterans and people with serious mental illness. Jordan Landing’s 30 ESSHI- funded supportive units (15 for veterans and 15 for individuals living with mental illness) directly target these vulnerable populations, pairing stable housing with comprehensive on-site services. Additionally, the project is strategically located approximately 30 minutes from the Micron facility, positioning it to serve the expanding workforce associated with this transformative regional investment. As Micron and its suppliers bring thousands of new jobs to Central New York, the need for attainable, workforce-appropriate housing will intensify. Jordan Landing fills this gap by offering energy-efficient, affordable units in a walkable village setting close to jobs, transit, schools, and amenities—meeting both existing and emerging housing needs across income levels.
In short, Jordan Landing fulfills multiple layers of unmet community need: it increases the affordable and supportive housing supply in a constrained market, advances the region’s capacity to accommodate workforce growth, and provides a stable, service-enriched environment for those most at risk of homelessness.
3. Describe how the proposed project aligns with the Plan Onondaga County comprehensive plan. (Plan Onondaga) Jordan Landing is fully aligned with the priorities and guiding principles of Plan Onondaga, which emphasizes sustainable growth, housing choice, community revitalization, and equitable access to opportunity.
The project exemplifies smart growth and infill development by utilizing vacant land within the Village of Jordan—an established, infrastructure-served area—rather than extending development into greenfield sites. By leveraging existing water, sewer, and transportation infrastructure, the 2 development supports the Plan’s goal of focusing investment where services already exist, preserving rural character while strengthening village centers.
The Plan calls for expanded housing options that meet the needs of a diverse population, including seniors, families, veterans, and individuals with disabilities. Jordan Landing fulfills this by delivering a mix of income levels and household types, combining affordable workforce units with 30 supportive apartments for individuals and veterans in need of stability. This integrated approach promotes inclusion and community cohesion, key themes within Plan Onondaga’s housing and human services strategies.
Furthermore, the project advances the Plan’s economic development and community renewal goals by ensuring that new and existing workers—particularly those tied to regional employers such as Micron—can find quality housing within commuting distance. The development’s location along the Erie Canalway Trail and its walkable access to schools, shops, and civic amenities also reinforce Plan Onondaga’s vision for connected, livable communities that prioritize health, accessibility, and quality of life.
In essence, Jordan Landing translates Plan Onondaga’s priorities from policy to action: creating inclusive, sustainable, and locally integrated housing that strengthens the social and economic fabric of Onondaga County.
4. Is the Project considered infill in a populated area? If yes, please explain.
Jordan Landing is unequivocally an infill development within a populated area. The eight-acre site is located within the Village of Jordan and is directly adjacent to existing multifamily housing, including the 90-unit Old Erie Place community. It is surrounded by established residential neighborhoods, schools, a library, shops, and the Erie Canal Trail—all within a short walk.
The Village proactively rezoned the parcel from R-A (single-family residential) to R-C (multi-family residential) to accommodate the project, demonstrating strong local support and recognition of the site’s appropriateness for higher-density infill housing. Existing municipal water and sewer infrastructure serve the property, minimizing environmental impact and ensuring efficient land use. By reactivating a vacant parcel at the edge of an existing residential corridor, Jordan Landing strengthens the village’s housing base, supports local businesses, and enhances walkability and connectivity. Rather than contributing to suburban sprawl, it reinvests in the heart of an established community—an approach that embodies both the spirit and intent of New York State’s Smart Growth and community revitalization principles.
5. Is there additional infrastructure necessary to service the project? If yes, please explain. No the water, sewer and electric infrastructure exists on site.
3 6. Is the project a part of a larger mixed-use development? If yes, please describe. No. The Project is a standalone housing development.
4
Project: Clay Hospitality, LLC Project Number: 3101-25-08A
Location: Clay School District: Liverpool Project Type: New Construction, Hotel Tax Parcel(s): 021.-01-05.3; 021.-01-05.6; 021.-01-04.1 Village: N/A Total Project Cost: $ 19,253,000 8. Total Jobs 15 Land Acquisition $ 945,000 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work/Demo $ 1,300,000 8B: Job Creation 15 Building Construction & Renovation $ 10,635,000 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ 2,200,000 Equipment $ 1,500,000 Project Soft Cost $ 2,673,000 Community Investment /Abatement Project Description Fiscal Impact ($) Abatement Summary $1,729,138 Sales Tax Abatement $800,000 Mortgage Tax Abatement $96,747 Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $832,391 The applicant is proposing to construct a 64,000 +/- sq. ft. Home2 Suites by Hilton Community Investment $31,466,217 extended stay hotel consisting of 103 suites on approximately 2.54 acres in the Town PILOT Payments $978,403 of Clay. Project Salaries and Benefits Estimated (10 yrs) $7,539,170 Construction Benefit Estimate $3,695,643 Total Project Cost $19,253,000 Investment:Abatement Ratio 18.20 :1 © 2026 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency. All rights reserved.
Clay Hospitality, LLC A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet for 10 years OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 945,000 Projected investment $ 10,635,000 OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 5,871,000 OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 6,816,000 Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 251,056 Scheduled PILOT payments $ 978,403 Full Tax County PILOT School PILOT YEAR Exemption % Town Village Total PILOT Payment w/o Net Exemption Amount District
1 100% $ 2,831 $ 1,630 $ 18,466 $ - $ 22,928 $ 165,374 $ 142,445 2 90% $ 4,682 $ 2,696 $ 30,538 $ - $ 37,916 $ 168,681 $ 130,765 3 80% $ 6,606 $ 3,804 $ 43,085 $ - $ 53,494 $ 172,055 $ 118,560 4 70% $ 8,605 $ 4,955 $ 56,121 $ - $ 69,681 $ 175,496 $ 105,815 5 60% $ 10,681 $ 6,150 $ 69,662 $ - $ 86,493 $ 179,006 $ 92,512 6 50% $ 12,837 $ 7,391 $ 83,722 $ - $ 103,950 $ 182,586 $ 78,636 7 40% $ 15,075 $ 8,680 $ 98,316 $ - $ 122,071 $ 186,237 $ 64,167 8 30% $ 17,397 $ 10,017 $ 113,461 $ - $ 140,875 $ 189,962 $ 49,088 9 20% $ 19,806 $ 11,404 $ 129,172 $ - $ 160,382 $ 193,761 $ 33,380 10 10% $ 22,305 $ 12,842 $ 145,466 $ - $ 180,613 $ 197,637 $ 17,024 TOTAL $ 120,827 $ 69,568 $ 788,008 $ - $ 978,403 $ 1,810,794 $ 832,391 Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Jobs Current/Actuals Creation Goals 11 3 1 Total Employment Goals 0 11 14 15 15 15 © 2026 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency. All rights reserved.
1. Fill in all blanks using “none”, “not applicable” or “not available”. If you have any questions about the way to respond, please call the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (the “Agency” or “OCIDA”) at 315-435-3770.
2. In accordance with Section 224-a(8)(d) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law, the Agency has identified that any “financial assistance” (within the meaning of Section 858 of the General Municipal Law) granted by the Agency to the Applicant consisting of sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax exemption benefits and real property tax exemption benefits, constitutes “public funds” within the meaning of Section 224-a(2)(b) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law and such funds are not excluded under Section 224-a(3) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law. The Agency hereby notifies the
Applicant of the Applicant’s obligations under Section 224-a (8)(a) of Article 8 of the New York Labor Law.
3. If the OCIDA Board approves benefits, it is the company’s responsibility to obtain and submit all necessary forms and documents.
4. All projects approved for benefits by the OCIDA Board will close with the Agency within 6-months of the OCIDA Board approval date. If this schedule cannot be met, the Applicant will need to submit a closing schedule modification written request to the Executive Director that will be presented to OCIDA Board for consideration.
5. The Agency will not give final approval for this Application until the Agency receives a completed NYS Full Environmental Assessment Form concerning the project which is the subject of this Application. The form is available at https://extapps.dec.ny.gov/docs/permits_ej_operations_pdf/feafpart1.pdf 6. Public Officers Law stipulates all records in the possession of the Agency (with certain limited exceptions) are open to public inspection and reproduction. Should the Applicant believe there are project elements which are trade secrets if publicly disclosed or otherwise widely disseminated, would cause substantial injury to the Applicant’s competitive position, the Applicant must identify such elements in writing and request that such elements be kept confidential. In accordance with Article 6 of the Public Officer’s Law, the Agency may also redact personal, private, and/or proprietary information from publicly disseminated documents.
7. A final Application (OCIDA staff reviewed/approved) and associated fees MUST be received at least 10 business days prior to the upcoming Board meeting to be placed on the agenda. A signed application may be submitted by mail and/or electronically in PDF format to Alexis Rodriguez at alexisrodriguez@ongov.net.
• A check payable to the Agency in the amount of $1,000 • A check payable to Barclay Damon LLP in the amount of $2,500 This Application was adopted by the OCIDA Board on February 15, 2024.
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 1 Submit completed application to:
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
Phone: 315-435-3770 alexisrodriguez@ongov.net
Submittal Date: 5/13/2026 _____________ A) Applicant/Project Operator information (company receiving benefits):
__________________________________________________ Hospitality, LLC
Applicant/Project Operator Address: 15 _______________________________________ __________ Fisher Road, Suite 15, Pittsford, NY 14534 Phone: 585-485-0131 __________________________ Fax: ________________________ __________ Website: ___________________________ Email: neil.patel@baywoodhotels.com _____________________ ____________ Federal ID#: 33-1258416 ________________________ NAICS: 721110 ________________________________ State of Incorporation: NY ____________________________________________________________ See link for your NYS incorporation information. https://apps.dos.ny.gov/publicInquiry 2. Owner (if different from Applicant/Project Operator): ____________________________ Owner Address: __________________________________________________________ Federal ID#: ______________________________________________________________ State of Incorporation: ______________________________________________________ List of stockholders, members, or partners of Owner: ____________________________ _ B) Applicant Business Organization (check appropriate category):
☐ Corporation ☐ Partnership ☐ Public Corporation ☐ Joint Venture ☐ Sole Proprietorship ✔ Limited Liability Company ☐ ☐ Other, explain List all stockholders, members, or partners with % of ownership greater than 5%: Name % of ownership ___________________________________ Neil H. Patel (Managing Member _________________________________
___________________________________ Amit Patel _________________________________
___________________________________ Jayesh Patel _________________________________
___________________________________ Vinod Patel _________________________________
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 2 C) Applicant Business Description:
Estimated % of sales within Onondaga County: 100_________________________________ Estimated % of sales outside Onondaga County but within New York State: 0___________ Estimated % of sales outside New York State but within the U.S.: 0 __________________ Estimated % of sales outside the U.S.: (*Percentage to equal 100%) 0 ________________
Applicant /Owner History: 1. Is the Owner and/or Applicant or any manager or owner of the Owner and/or Applicant now a x No ☐ Yes, explain plaintiff or defendant in any civil or criminal litigation? ☐ 2. Has any owner of manager of the Owner and/or Applicant listed above ever been convicted of a criminal offense (other than a minor traffic violation)? ☐ x No ☐ Yes, explain 3. Has any person listed in Section I ever been in receivership or declared bankruptcy? ✔ No ☐ Yes, explain ☐ D) Has the Applicant/Owner received assistance from Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (OCIDA, Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (SIDA), New York State or the Onondaga Civic Development Corporation (OCDC) in the past?
✔ ☐No ☐ Yes, explain (Provide year, project name, benefit description, amounts, address) E) Individual Completing Application:
Name: Neil Patel Title: Managing _______________________________ Member Address: 15 Fisher Road, Suite 201, Pittsford, Phone: ______________________________
Cell Phone: 607-351-2268 E-mail:______________________________ neil.patel@baywoodhotels.com F) Company Contact (if different from individual completing application):
Name: Title: ____________________________ Address: Phone: ___________________________ Cell Phone: Email: ___________________________ Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 3 G) Company Counsel:
Name of Attorney: Matthew _____________________________________________________________ N. Wells Firm Name: Bond, __________________________________________________________________ Schoeneck & King, PLLC Address: One _____________________________________________________________________ Lincoln Center Phone: 315-218-8174 ______________________________________________________________________ Cell Phone: 315-481-8236 ___________________________________________________________________ Email: mwells@bsk.com _______________________________________________________________________ Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 4
A) Project Location is where the investment will take place. If Applicant is moving, the new
location should be entered here and the current location should be in Section I. Address:3955 NY-31 Legal Address (if different): TBD Upon Subdivision City:Liverpool Town: Clay _______________Village:
Zip Code:13090 School District: Liverpool Tax Map Parcel ID(s): 021.-01-05.3 & 021.-01-05.6 & 021.-01-04.1 Full Market Value: $945,000.00 _______________ Square Footage of Existing Building(s):_______________ Vacant land B) Project Activity (Check all that apply):
✔ New construction ☐ ☐ Acquisition of existing facility ☐ Expansion to current facilities ☐ Brownfield/Remediated Brownfield ☐ Renovation of existing facility ☐ Demolition and construction ☐ Purchase of machinery/equipment C) Select Project Type or Project End Use at site (you may check more than one): ☐ Manufacturing ☐ Mixed Use ✔ Retail (see Section V) ☐ ☐ Facility of Aging ☐ Housing Project (see Section VII) ☐ Distribution/Wholesale ☐ Civic Facility (not for profit) ☐ Commercial ☐ Industrial ☐ Renewable Energy Project (see Section VI) ✔ Other, explain ☐ Hotel D) Project Narrative: Please check one of the two boxes below and attach statement. ✔ A statement that the Project described in this application would not be undertaken but for ☐ the financial assistance provided by the Agency.
☐ If the Project is going to advance regardless of any financial assistance from the Agency, please provide a statement indicating why the project should be considered by the Agency for any financial assistance.
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 5 E) Description of Project: Please attach a detailed narrative of the proposed Project. Please attached copies of site plans, sketches or maps. This narrative should include, but is not limited to:
✔ (i) a description of your Company’s background, customers, goods and services and the ☐ principal products to be produced and/or the principal activities that will occur on the Project site;
✔ (ii) the size of the Project in square feet and a breakdown of square footage per each ☐ intended use;
✔ (iii) the size of the lot upon which the Project sits or is to be constructed; ☐ ✔ (iv) the current use of the site and the intended use of the site upon completion of the ☐ Project;
✔ (v) describe your method for site control (Own, lease, other).
☐ F) Will the completion of the Project result in the removal of an industrial or manufacturing plant of the company from one area of the state to another area of the state OR in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the company located within the state?
✔ No ☐ Yes ☐ G) Please describe any compelling circumstances the Agency should be aware of while reviewing this application.
H) Local Approvals (Site Plan and Environmental Review) Have site plans been submitted to the appropriate town or local planning department? ☐ No. When will the plans be submitted? _____☐ ✔ Yes, what is the status?_A_pproved ___ _ Has the project received site plan approval from the town or local planning board? ☐ No, anticipated approval date. _____ ✔ ☐Yes, date 8/13/2024 _____ _ If yes, provide the Agency with a copy of the Planning Board’s approval resolution along with the related SEQR determination. (NOTE: SEQR determination is required for final approval and sales tax agency appointment.)
a. Please attach the appropriate Environmental Impact Forms to your application. Here is a link to the SEQR forms: https://extapps.dec.ny.gov/docs/permits_ej_operations_pdf/feafpart1.pdf b. Has Lead Agency been established? ☐ No ☐ ✔ Yes, name of Lead Agency ______of Town ____ ___ Clay Board c. Have any environmental issues been identified on the property?
☐✔ No ☐ Yes, explain Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency Page 6
A) Project Costs and Finances Description of Costs Total Budget Amount Land Acquisition 945,000.00 Site Work/Demo 1,300,000.00 Building Construction & Renovation 10,635,000.00 Furniture & Fixtures 2,200,000.00 Equipment 1,500,000.00 Project Soft Cost 2,673,000.00 Management/Developer Total Project Cost Fees project 19,253,000.00 cost Management/Developer Fees projecthave Please costdocumentation available upon request. Do not include OCIDA fees, OCIDA application fees or OCIDA legal fees as part of the Total Project Cost.
Sources of Funds for Project Costs:
1. Bank Financing $__________________
2. Equity $__________________
3. Tax Exempt Bond Issuance (if applicable) $__________________ N/A 4. Taxable Bond Issuance (if applicable) $__________________ N/A 5. Total Sources of Funds for Project Costs $__________________
grants and tax credits) $__________________ -Identify each state and federal grant/credit:
__________________________________ $__________________ __________________________________ $__________________ __________________________________ $__________________
This is a long document — showing the opening sections. Read the complete text.