Machine-extracted (OCR) from the official document — formatting is approximate; the official copy governs.
335 MONTGOMERY STREET, FLOOR 2M, SYRACUSE, NY 13202
315.435.3770 • ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT@ONGOV.NET • ONGOVED.COM
Regular Meeting Agenda
June 4, 2026
Call to Order the Regular Meeting of the Agency
A. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes: May 14, 2026
B. Treasurer’s Report
C. Payment of Bills
D. Conflict of Interest
Action Items:
1. Jordan Landing LLC and Jordan Landing Housing Development Fund Corporation
(Project #3101-25-07A) Second Meeting
The applicant is proposing to construct 65 mixed-income housing units on approximately 8
vacant acres of land in the Village of Jordan. The project will also include a community room,
fitness area, supporting housing services, offices, and laundry facilities.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board to authorize adoption of SEQRA determination.
b. A resolution of the Board authorizing the financial assistance the Agency will provide.
Agency benefits requested include exemptions from certain real property taxes and real
estate transfer taxes.
Representative: Patrick Rock, Jordan Landing LLC, Managing Member
2. Clay Hospitality, LLC (Project #3101-25-08A) First Meeting
The applicant is proposing to construct an approximately 64,000 sq. ft. extended stay hotel
consisting of approximately 103 extended-stay suites with kitchenettes, and approximately
1,100 square feet of meeting space on an approximately 2.5-acre site in the Town of Clay.
The project will also include an indoor pool, fitness center, outdoor patio with fire pits, grills,
heaters, and seating, laundry facilities, market pantry, breakfast dining area and multi-
functional lobby/lounge, and parking to accommodate trailers, boats, construction
vehicles, etc. The hotel will be operated under the Home2 Suites by Hilton brand.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing a public hearing.
Representatives: Neil Patel, Clay Hospitality, LLC, Managing Member
Sandeep Gautam, Baywood Hotels, Vice President of Asset Management
Matthew Wells, Clay Hospitality, LLC, Counsel
Thomas Clifford, Clay Hospitality, LLC, Counsel
Page 1 of 242
3. D&D Motor Systems, Inc. (Project #3101-26-03A) First Meeting
The applicant is proposing to acquire an interest in real property containing a 32,344 sq. ft.
building in the Village of East Syracuse and move and expand their motor manufacturing
business.
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing a public hearing.
Representative: Mike Dieroff, D&D Motor Systems, Inc., Founder/Owner/President
4. Micron New York Semiconductor Manufacturing LLC - Project Updates
Main Campus (Project #3101-23-07A), Rail Spur (Project # 3101-25-06A)
5. Contract Authorization
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board authorizing an amendment to the contract with Barton &
Loguidice, D.P.C., consisting of an increase to the amount authorized for engineering
services related to White Pine Science & Technology Park.
Representative: Robert Petrovich, Executive Director
6. White Pine Science & Technology Park
Agency Action Requested:
a. A resolution of the Board adopting the final scoping document pursuant to the State
Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) for the White Pine Science &
Technology Park, and authorizing the filing and distribution of the Final Scope
pursuant to the requirements of SEQRA.
Representative: Jeffrey Davis, Agency Counsel
Adjourn
Page 2 of 242
Regular Meeting Minutes
May 14, 2026
A Regular meeting of the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency was held on Thursday,
May 14, 2026, at 335 Montgomery Street, Floor 2M, Syracuse, New York.
Prior to calling the meeting to order, Randy Wolken welcomed the new board members, and each
introduced themselves.
Randy Wolken called the meeting to order at 8:30 AM with the following in attendance:
PRESENT:
Randy Wolken
Alan Marzullo
Mark Muthumbi
Michael Greene
Christina Hollenback
Sally Santangelo
ABSENT:
Deka Eysaman
ALSO PRESENT:
Robert Petrovich, Executive Director
Nate Stevens, Treasurer
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Robert Schoeneck, Assistant Treasurer
Evan Carter, Assistant Secretary
Amanda Fitzgerald, Esq., Agency Counsel
Jeffrey Davis, Esq., Agency Counsel (via Zoom)
Charlie Breuer, Twin Ponds HB, LLC, Managing Member
Brody Smith, Twin Ponds HB, LLC, Counsel
Approval of Meeting Minutes: April 9, 2026
Upon motion by Mark Muthumbi, seconded by Alan Marzullo, the Board approved the Regular
meeting minutes of April 9, 2026. Motion was carried.
Treasurer’s Report:
Nate Stevens gave a brief overview of the Treasurer’s Report for the month of April 2026.
Page 3 of 242
Upon motion by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Mark Muthumbi, the Board approved the Treasurer’s
Report for the month of April 2026. Motion was carried.
Payment of Bills:
Upon motion by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Mark Muthumbi, the Board approved the Payment of
Bills. Motion was carried.
Action Items:
1. Twin Ponds HB, LLC (Project #3101-25-02A) Second Meeting
The applicant is proposing to construct a residential community consisting of approximately
309 multifamily units, a commercial space, and recreational areas in the Town of Manlius.
Specific project amenities will include a well-equipped fitness center, a children’s play area, a
dog park, a new dock, and a covered pavilion.
Brody Smith, attorney at Bond Schoeneck & King who represents Twin Ponds HB, LLC
made the following comments:
The applicant proposes to construct a residential community consisting of 309 multifamily
units as well as 5,700 sq. ft. of commercial space. In addition to that, there will be
recreational areas associated with the ponds on the property. Most of the units will be in
three five-story buildings except for five apartments being above the commercial space in a
separate building. Amenities are to include a fitness center inside of a clubhouse, a
children’s play area, a dog park, a dock at the ponds for non-motorized watercrafts and
fishing, and a covered pavilion adjacent to the ponds.
In addition to these amenities, the community will be surrounded by hiking trails, which will
be able to connect two areas that are not currently linked by pedestrian paths. Limestone
Creek to the east of the development can connect to the Erie Canalway Trail, where the Town
and Village have expressed interest in having a connection. To the west of the development,
you would make your way to the Town Center Retirement Community, Northeast Medical,
and then to the southwest, you’d find the Town Center with retail and restaurants.
The location is a 54-acre site at 5440 North Burdick St. The land is currently unimproved.
There were once two quarries on the parcel that were then filled with water to create the twin
ponds. Over the years there have been many attempts to develop the property but
development was not able to come to fruition for reasons such as the property being
incumbered by slopes, wetlands, a lack of usable space on the property, which was a
challenge regarding the Town of Manlius zoning codes. This was overcome by the new
Page 4 of 242
Planned Unit Development (PUD) law that was developed. On November 1, 2023, the Town Board adopted a District Plan, a zoning amendment, that allowed this project to move forward. The site plan was approved by the Town Board on August 26, 2024, after an extensive environmental review, including a review of environmental impacts, delineation of wetlands, preparation of a traffic study, and preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan. Onondaga County Planning supported the project and gave input on the project, ultimately leading to the Town adopting the project. There are five major points of this project. The first being project economics. The project costs will be $114 million resulting in a community investment of over $126 million. If the project doesn’t move forward on the existing plot of land, it would collect $172,000 in taxes over 10 years, whereas if the project does move forward it will collect $2,972,000 in the same time period. Additionally, the project will create 140 construction jobs that will begin as early as late 2026 and last two years. There will be seven full-time jobs as a result of the project, but this is a conservative number. This project will not proceed under the current lending environment and rapidly increasing construction costs without the tax incentives proposed to the Board for approval.
The second point is that there is a need for housing. The Manlius Town Board was specific in their letter of support claiming that there is an urgent need for more apartments in particular in their community. Previous zoning patterns in the Town of Manlius have blocked this type of project in the past. The applicant included an updated housing study that defines the need for more apartment units in the Town, in the eastern suburbs of the County specifically. The number of available apartment units in the eastern suburbs out of the 14 complexes was 0 at the time of the study. In the northern suburbs there were over 3,100 total apartment units, and only six were available at the time. This process was completed over three months and the findings were consistent. The Town of Manlius acknowledges the need, having stated this need before and adjusting their zoning code accordingly.
The third point is in regard to the Onondaga County Comprehensive Plan, which calls out a
need for this type of housing. There is a shortage of units in the overall County. The
County’s Comprehensive Plan states, “Today’s housing needs have changed dramatically due
in large part to fewer households with children, fewer married household, and an aging
population overall. There’s an increasing demand for apartments and attached units on small
lots in more walkable neighborhoods. Shifts in housing size, makeup, lifestyle preference,
declining/willingness/ability to own a home, and available inventory have led to an increase
in demand for apartment units over detached owner-occupied homes.” This site is
conveniently located in close proximity to shops and dining, allowing residents to easily walk
to these areas in addition to the amenities provided such as the ponds, hiking trails, and Erie
Canalway Trail system. According to the applicant, these characteristics match what was put
forward in the Onondaga County Comprehensive Plan.
Page 5 of 242
The fourth point is that this development is the type of project that the Agency’s UTEP was amended to align with. This project is infill, which doesn’t need a substantial update of existing infrastructure. The project site is surrounded by retail, senior housing, and a medical complex. Additionally, the site is not in close proximity to single family residential neighborhoods, which would avoid any negative impacts that typically hinder this kind of development. The fifth point is that outdoor recreation is a huge opportunity for this project. It has the potential to provide ample outdoor activities such as hiking trails. The project is situated to not only be an advantage to new residents, but also existing residents in the Village and residents at the senior living complexes. The trail connections were made a part of the planning improvement in the district planning conditions proposed by the Town, where the developer agreed to connect the trailways. The project is sustainable, including chargers for electric vehicles, and will utilize electric over gas for appliances and heating, as well as special accommodations that go above the Agency’s requirements because of planning conditions that were agreed to regarding units set aside for people with severe disabilities.
Referring to the Agency’s UTEP, B. Smith pointed out six points to think about while evaluating a project: is the housing fulfilling an unmet need in the area, is there an applicable market study documenting the need for such housing, is the project aligned with the Plan Onondaga County Comprehensive Plan, is it infill, is any additional infrastructure needed to service this project, and is the project apart of a large mixed-use development. B. Smith relayed that this project meets all those standards. Sally Santangelo asked how many units will be set aside for individuals with physical disabilities. B. Smith responded that all of the units will be ADA-compliant, but in addition to that, the Planning Board and the Town identified that there is a benefit to having a certain number of units that are specifically designed for people with unique disabilities, above and beyond what the ADA accommodates. Conditions within the project’s zone change state that the owner shall convert no less than one apartment per 100 to be handicap accessible for persons with disabilities, wheelchair, vision, and hearing, as needed. There will be at least three units that will meet these standards, and the units will be modified to accommodate the individuals who will be applying for them.
Alexis Rodriguez noted that there was a public hearing held for the project on April 29, 2026.
Seven spoke in favor of the Agency’s proposed financial assistance. One of the participants
who spoke in favor was Sara Bollinger, Town of Manlius Supervisor. The school district
was also in attendance but did not make comments regarding the financial assistance. There
were two individuals who spoke in opposition to the proposed financial assistance.
Page 6 of 242
Alan Marzullo stated that it’s important to note that in the descent that the Board is required
to only look at projects that are related to industrial, that’s not true. When you start looking
at guiding community development and housing, that’s a job that this Board needs to do and
take into account. Hearing what Brody Smith had to share, we know that the County is in
deep need of housing. For all those reasons, I would move to make a motion.
Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board to authorize
adoption of SEQRA determination.” Motion was made by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Mark
Muthumbi. Motion was carried.
Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board authorizing the
financial assistance the Agency will provide. Agency benefits requested include exemptions
from certain real property taxes, real estate transfer taxes, sales and use taxes and mortgage
recording taxes.” Motion was made by Alan Marzullo, seconded by Michael Greene.
Motion was carried.
2. EH 26, LLC (Formerly Destiny USA Real Estate) (Project # 3101-14-01B)
EH 26, LLC has requested the execution and delivery of a mortgage and related
documents with respect to a refinancing.
Amanda Fitzgerald stated that this is an administrative action. In order to provide financial
assistance to projects, the IDA nominally steps into title. This project is a PILOT that was
approved in 2016 in the City of Syracuse (Embassy Suites Hotel). It was formerly a Destiny
project, but a few years ago it was assigned to EH26, LLC. EH26, LLC is refinancing and is
asking for consent to refinance. The IDA is required to join the lender documents due to
being nominally in title. Before the IDA joins the documents, Council will review them to
ensure that they have the appropriate indemnification and hold harmless language that is
necessary.
Randy Wolken read the Agency action requested, “A resolution of the Board authorizing
execution and delivery of documents.” Motion was made by Sally Santangelo, seconded by
Christina Hollenback. Motion was carried.
Motion to adjourn was made by Alan Marzullo and seconded by Sally Santangelo at 8:50 AM.
___________________________________
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Page 7 of 242
May 31, 2026
Revenue / Expense / Income Current Period Current YTD
Operating/Non-Op Revenue 152,769 11,369,444
Administrative Expense 76,814 358,435
Operating/Program Expense 91,910 690,512
Net Ordinary Income (15,955) 10,320,496
Current Assets Current YTD
Total Cash 46,026,401
Escrow Accounts 96,762
Net Cash 45,929,639
Page 8 of 242
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
Statement of Activity
May 1-31, 2026
TOTAL Revenue 500 Operating Revenue 2116 Fees 2116.1 Agency Fees 2,500.00 Total for 2116 Fees $2,500.00 2410 Lease Income 12,901.06 Total for 500 Operating Revenue $15,401.06 501 Non-Operating Revenue 2401 Interest Income 25,803.96 2405 WPCP Savings - Interest Income 31,008.94 2406 WPCP Phase 1 Improvements - Interest 36,511.67 2407 WPCP Phase 2 Improvements - Interest 44,043.41 Total for 501 Non-Operating Revenue $137,367.98 Total for Revenue $152,769.04 Gross Profit $152,769.04
Expenditures 6400 Operating Expense 6406 Other Professional Services 6406.50 Consulting Services 3,000.00 Total for 6406 Other Professional Services $3,000.00 6407 Administrative Expense 76,813.87 6409 Conference Attendence 353.97 6410 Office Expense 1,483.30 Total for 6400 Operating Expense $81,651.14 6440 Legal Fees 6450 Barclay Damon 6460 IDA General Legal 677.00 6480 Roth Legal 1,742.50 Total for 6450 Barclay Damon $2,419.50 Total for 6440 Legal Fees $2,419.50 6500 Agency Program Expenses 6510 White Pine Commerce Park 6510.3 Legal 1,206.00 Total for 6510 White Pine Commerce Park $1,206.00 6540 3649 Erie Blvd E 6540.3 Insurance 20,704.50 6540.4 Maintenance 950.00 6540.5 Legal 16,327.75 Total for 6540 3649 Erie Blvd E $37,982.25 Total for 6500 Agency Program Expenses $39,188.25
Page 9 of 242
Accrual Basis Monday, June 01, 2026 06:09 PM GMTZ 1/2
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
Statement of Activity
May 1-31, 2026
TOTAL
6514 White Pine Science & Technology Park
6514.1 Legal 19,632.42
6514.2 Engineering 2,188.50
6514.7 WPSTP - Marketing 23,643.86
Total for 6514 White Pine Science & Technology Park $45,464.78
6610 WPCP Pass Thru Expenses
6610.6 Barton & Loguidice 28,682.00
6610.7 Gorick Construction 410,400.00
Total for 6610 WPCP Pass Thru Expenses $439,082.00
Total for Expenditures $607,805.67
Net Operating Revenue -$455,036.63
Net Revenue -$455,036.63
Page 10 of 242
Accrual Basis Monday, June 01, 2026 06:09 PM GMTZ 2/2
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
Statement of Financial Position
As of May 31, 2026
TOTAL
Assets Current Assets Bank Accounts 200.6 NBT OCIDA Savings 7,559,849.34 200.7 NBT - WPCP Savings 10,082,094.65 200.8 NBT - WPCP Phase 1 Improvements 12,283,722.13 200.9 NBT - WPCP Phase 2 Improvements 15,053,970.71 200 Cash $0.00 200.5 NBT Checking 1,046,764.08 Total for 200 Cash $1,046,764.08 Total for Bank Accounts $46,026,400.91 Accounts Receivable 380 Accounts Rec. 380.6 A/R Fees, Lease & PILOT 331,319.51 Total for 380 Accounts Rec. $331,319.51 Total for Accounts Receivable $331,319.51 Total for Current Assets $46,357,720.42 Fixed Assets 100 Land 105 3649 Erie Blvd East 16,117,318.46 107 800 Hiawatha 604,840.42 108 White Pine Science & Technology Park 2,140,557.00 Total for 100 Land $18,862,715.88 250 Investment in Real Property 3,082,772.87 Total for Fixed Assets $21,945,488.75 Total for Assets $68,303,209.17
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Other Current Liabilities
600 Accounts Payable $0.00
600.1 Due to Related Party - OED 233,801.21
600.3 Onondaga County Loan $28,079,656.77
600.31 Accrued Interest - OC Note Payable 3,095,059.00
Total for 600.3 Onondaga County Loan $31,174,715.77
600.4 Micron Deposit 96,761.54
Total for 600 Accounts Payable $31,505,278.52
Total for Other Current Liabilities $31,505,278.52
Total for Current Liabilities $31,505,278.52
Page 11 of 242
Accrual Basis Monday, June 01, 2026 06:10 PM GMTZ 1/2
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
Statement of Financial Position
As of May 31, 2026
TOTAL
Long-term Liabilities
600.5 Onondaga County Loan - Non WPCP 13,577,147.96
Total for Long-term Liabilities $13,577,147.96
Total for Liabilities $45,082,426.48
Equity
3901 Equity-Investment Fixed Assets 5,277,648.00
3900 Equity Unreserved 8,119,894.18
Net Revenue 9,823,240.51
Total for Equity $23,220,782.69
Total for Liabilities and Equity $68,303,209.17
Page 12 of 242
Accrual Basis Monday, June 01, 2026 06:10 PM GMTZ 2/2
ONONDAGA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT OF BILLS - SCHEDULE #517 June 4, 2026
GENERAL EXPENSES 1. DRYDEN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. $ 1,661.20 Insurance Premium, Inv #S4 2. SELECTIVE $ 20,698.00 Insurance Payment #3 - 3649 Erie Blvd 3. JMT OF NEW YORK, LLP $ 10,908.00 Roth Steel, Inv #1-106961 4. GORICK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. $ 21,600.00 WPCP Demolition Retainage - Inv#23449 5. ONONDAGA COUNTY $ 10,000,000.00 Partial Loan Repayment - per Terms of Promissory Note 6. GROSSMAN ST. AMOUR $ 17,200.00 2025 Audit 7. ONONDAGA COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY $ 151.73 8538 Caughdenoy Rd - Final 8. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 720.00 Retained Corporate & Public Finance Matters - Inv #5392276 9. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 21,786.40 Neighbors for a Better Micron - Inv #5392272 10. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 14,485.26 WPSTP - Inv #5392275 11. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 14,512.97 OCIDA - Shoppingtown - Inv #5392274 12. LOVELL AND ASSOCIATES $ 3,000.00 May 2026 Consulting
13. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 1,582.50
Roth Steel - Inv #5392277
14. ABC CREATIVE $ 10,920.00
Inv #8987 - Agency Services
Page 13 of 242
15. BARCLAY DAMON LLP $ 23,337.51
Micron Financial Assistance - February 2026
16. BOND SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC 919.28
Inv #20132705 - Tessy Elbridge Resolution
17. ASSOCIATED REPORTERS INTERNATIONAL INC. $ 620.00
WPSTP Public Hearing - 4/30/2026
18. ROBERT PETROVICH $ 114.99
Mileage
19. NANCY LOWERY $ 141.06
Mileage
20. NATHANIEL STEVENS $ 114.99
Mileage
21. ALEXIS RODRIGUEZ $ 141.06
Mileage
22. EVAN CARTER $ 141.06
Mileage
22. ROBERT SCHOENECK $ 114.99
Mileage
TOTAL $ 10,164,871.00
Page 14 of 242
5/29/2026
Project: Jordan Landing LLC Project Number: 3101-25-07A
Location: 577 Peru Road School District: Jordan-Elbridge
Project Type: New Construction, Housing
Tax Parcel(s): 006.1-01-03.1; 006.1-01-04.1; 006.1-01-05.0 Village: Jordan
Total Project Cost: $ 31,974,380 8. Total Jobs 5 Land Acquisition $ 200,000 8A. Job Retention 0 Site Work/Demo $ 3,051,000 8B: Job Creation 5 Building Construction & Renovation $ 19,289,831 (Next 5 Years) Furniture & Fixtures $ - Equipment $ 25,000 Project Soft Cost $ 9,408,549
Community Investment /Abatement Project Description
Fiscal Impact ($)
Abatement Summary $744,300
Sales Tax Abatement $0
Mortgage Tax Abatement $0
Property Tax Relief (PILOT) $744,300
The applicant is proposing to construct 65 mixed-income housing units on
Community Investment $37,882,355
approximately 7.84 vacant acres of land adjacent to the Erie Canal Trail in the Village
PILOT Payments $753,338 of Jordan. 30 units will be integrated supportive units for homeless veterans and
Project Salaries and Benefits Estimated (10 yrs) $3,306,816 individuals with Serious Mental Illness (SMI).
Construction Benefit Estimate $1,847,822
Total Project Cost $31,974,380
Investment:Abatement Ratio 50.90 :1
© 2026 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency. All rights reserved.
Page 15 of 242
Jordan Landing LLC
A) PILOTS Estimate Table Worksheet
for 13 years
OCIDA estimate of current market value $ 37,950
Projected investment $ 19,289,831
OCIDA estimate of increase in value $ 3,562,050
OCIDA estimated value after project is completed $ 3,600,000
Taxes that would have been collected if the project did not occur $ 15,788
Scheduled PILOT payments $ 753,338
Full Tax
County PILOT School
PILOT YEAR Exemption % Town Village Total PILOT Payment w/o Net Exemption
Amount District
PILOT
1 100% $ 116 $ 114 $ 640 $ 205 $ 1,075.42 $ 102,017 $ 100,941
2 60% $ 4,546 $ 4,494 $ 25,175 $ 8,066 $ 42,280.93 $ 104,057 $ 61,776
3 60% $ 4,637 $ 4,584 $ 25,679 $ 8,227 $ 43,126.55 $ 106,138 $ 63,012
4 60% $ 4,729 $ 4,676 $ 26,192 $ 8,392 $ 43,989.08 $ 108,261 $ 64,272
5 60% $ 4,824 $ 4,769 $ 26,716 $ 8,560 $ 44,868.86 $ 110,426 $ 65,557
6 55% $ 5,519 $ 5,457 $ 30,568 $ 9,794 $ 51,338.60 $ 112,635 $ 61,296
7 55% $ 5,630 $ 5,566 $ 31,180 $ 9,990 $ 52,365.37 $ 114,887 $ 62,522
8 55% $ 5,742 $ 5,677 $ 31,803 $ 10,189 $ 53,412.68 $ 117,185 $ 63,772
9 45% $ 7,129 $ 7,048 $ 39,481 $ 12,649 $ 66,307.80 $ 119,529 $ 53,221
10 45% $ 7,271 $ 7,189 $ 40,271 $ 12,902 $ 67,633.96 $ 121,919 $ 54,285
11 35% $ 8,740 $ 8,641 $ 48,403 $ 15,508 $ 81,291.31 $ 124,358 $ 43,066
12 25% $ 10,264 $ 10,148 $ 56,844 $ 18,212 $ 95,467.90 $ 126,845 $ 31,377
13 15% $ 11,845 $ 11,711 $ 65,603 $ 21,019 $ 110,179.04 $ 129,382 $ 19,203
TOTAL $ 80,992 $ 80,075 $ 448,557 $ 143,713 $ 753,338 $ 1,497,637 $ 744,300
Year
0 1 2 3 4 5
Jobs
Current/Actuals
Creation Goals 5
Total
Employment
Goals 0 5 5 5 5 5
© 2026 Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency. All rights reserved.
Page 16 of 242
Page 17 of 242
Page 18 of 242
Jordan Landing
Proposed Organizational Chart
Jordan Landing Housing Development
Fund Corporation Jordan Landing LLC
New York Housing Development Fund Nominee Agreement New York Limited Liability Company
Corporation Beneficial Owner
Nominee Owner/Fee Title Holder
Eagle Star Housing Inc. Jordan Landing Managers LLC
To be Formed Investor LLC
New York not-for-profit Managing Member
Investor Member
corporation .01%
99.99%
100% Member
Eagle Star Housing, Inc. Jordan Developers LLC Tax Credit Investor
New York not-for-profit New York for-profit New York for-profit
corporation corporation corporation
51% Member 49% Member 100% Member
Rock PMC Rockabill Development LLC
New York for-profit New York for-profit
corporation corporation
51% Member 49% Member
Page 19 of 242
Page 20 of 242
Page 21 of 242
Page 22 of 242
Page 23 of 242
Page 24 of 242
Page 25 of 242
Page 26 of 242
Page 27 of 242
Page 28 of 242
Page 29 of 242
Page 30 of 242
Page 31 of 242
Page 32 of 242
Page 33 of 242
Page 34 of 242
Page 35 of 242
Page 36 of 242
Section XI: Conflict of Interest
Agency Board Members
Randy Wolken
Alan Marzullo
Mark Muthumbi
Deka Eysaman
Christina Hollenback
Sally Santangelo
Michael Greene
Agency Officers/Staff
Robert M. Petrovich, Executive Director
Nathaniel Stevens, Treasurer
Alexis Rodriguez, Secretary
Evan Carter, Assistant Secretary
Robert Schoneck, Assistant Treasurer
Agency Legal Counsel & Auditor
Jeffrey Davis, Esq., Barclay Damon LLP
Amanda Fitzgerald, Esq., Barclay Damon LLP
Michael Lisson, CPA, Grossman St. Amour CPAs, PLLC
The Applicant(s) has received a list of members, officers and staff of the Agency. To the best of my
knowledge, no member, officer or employee of the Agency has an interest, whether direct or indirect,
in any transaction contemplated by this Application, except as hereinafter described:
If there are two applicants (Real Estate Holding and Operating Company) both need to complete this
page.
Name of Applicant(s) Company _________________________________
Jordan Landing LLC
Signature of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________
Patrick Rock Digitally signed by Patrick Rock
Date: 2026.05.19 14:11:36 -04'00'
Name & Title of Officer or Authorized Representative: _________________________________
Patrick Rock, GP
Date: ______________
5/19/2026
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency
Page 37 of 242 Page 19
Page 38 of 242
Page 39 of 242
Page 40 of 242
Page 41 of 242
Section I: C) 4.Has the Applicant/Owner received assistance from Onondaga County Industrial DevelopmentAgency (OCIDA, Syracuse Industrial
Development Agency (SIDA), New York State or theOnondaga Civic Development Corporation (OCDC) in the past?
Below is a list of housing developments completed by the Applicant's affiliated entities
# of
# of Housing Completion
Project Name Project Address Buildings Units Date Government Funding Programs
Paddock's Landing 116 State Street, Phoenix, NY 13135 1 32 4/6/1983 USDA Rural Development 515
Village Center 456 Main Street, Phoenix, NY 13135 1 15 6/1/1984 USDA Rural Development 515
Bradley Associates 56 Davis Street, Phoenix, NY 13135 2 24 6/27/1986 USDA Rural Development 515
Christopher Court 22 Maplehurst, Phoenix, NY 13135 5 40 4/30/1992 USDA Rural Development 515
Patrick Court 32 Maplehurst, Phoenix, NY 13135 2 24 12/16/1993 USDA Rural Development 515
Austin Court 42 Maplehurst, Phoenix, NY 13135 2 24 6/6/1998 USDA Rural Development 515 and New York State
Old Erie Place I 20 North Beaver Street, Jordan, NY 130 1 24 9/26/1986 USDA Rural Development 515
Old Erie Place II 20 North Beaver Street, Jordan, NY 130 1 24 12/19/1986 USDA Rural Development 515
Old Erie Place III 20 North Beaver Street, Jordan, NY 130 1 24 2/14/1994 USDA Rural Development 515
Old Erie Place IV 20 North Beaver Street, Jordan, NY 130 1 24 1/8/2002 USDA Rural Development 515 and New York State
Wolcott Meadows I 6032 Alport Street, Wolcott, NY 14590 5 40 11/8/1988 USDA Rural Development 515 and New York State
Wolcott Meadows II 6032 Alport Street, Wolcott, NY 14590 1 30 12/4/1994 USDA Rural Development 515 and New York State
Union Free School 23 First Street, Camillus, NY 13031 1 27 12/10/1993 New York State Housing Trust Fund
Minetto Senior Housing12 Schuyler Street, Oswego, NY 13126 1 39 1/9/2002 New York State Housing Trust Fund
Page 42 of 242
Section II D: Project Narrative:
A statement that the Project described in this application would not be undertaken but
for the financial assistance provided by the Agency.
The PILOT agreement from the IDA is necessary for the Project to move forward. The real estate
tax burden projected in year one is over $107,000. An amount that is unsustainable without a
drastic change to the rents making the project no longer affordable. A PILOT also provides comfort
to the investors, lenders and the State of New York, who are unlikely to invest without a stable
PILOT Payment. For the project to provide affordable rents targeting low and moderate income
families and veterans a PILOT is critical.
Page 43 of 242
E. Project Description
Jordan Landing:
• Overview of the Development
Jordan Landing is a thoughtfully designed, infill new construction development located in the Village of Jordan, Onondaga County, NY. Situated on 7.84 acres of vacant land (parcels 006.1-01-03.1, 006.1-01-04.1, and 006.1-01-05) adjacent to the Erie Canal Trail, this project will bring 65 units of mixed-income housing across nine two-story buildings. It is a response to pressing regional housing needs, offering high-quality, energy-efficient homes for working families and individuals—30 of which will be integrated supportive units for homeless veterans and individuals with Serious Mental Illness (SMI). The project received zoning support from the Village of Jordan in early 2025 and has since secured site plan approval, along with $250,000 in capital funding from OCHIP. The development’s design promotes mixed-income housing through income averaging, with units spanning 30%, 50%, 60%, and 70% of Area Median Income (AMI). The breakdown includes 35 one-bedroom, 16 two-bedroom, and 14 three-bedroom units, distributed across both townhouse and multifamily buildings. The multifamily building includes shared amenities: a community room, fitness area, service offices, and laundry facilities—all accessible to every resident. Below is a breakdown of units by bedroom type and AMI:
Bedroom
Total 30% 50% 60% 70%
Size Units AMI AMI AMI AMI
1 35 6 21 4 4
2 16 1 6 6 3
3 14 0 2 6 6
Total 65 7 29 16 13
% of Total 100% 11% 44.5% 24.5% 20%
The total square footage of the project is 74,203.
• Supportive Housing Component
Eagle Star Housing, a nonprofit service provider founded in 2012, leads the supportive housing
component. Their mission to serve veterans facing homelessness aligns closely with the state's
priorities. They have secured an award for 30 ESSHI-supported units (15 for homeless veterans,
15 for individuals with SMI). Eagle Star will provide direct services on-site, including mental
health support, case management, transportation, and resident programming. Services will be
1
Page 44 of 242
led by a highly qualified House Manager with a Master of Social Work and significant
experience, ensuring the program meets the complex needs of the target population.
This integrated approach not only helps vulnerable individuals remain stably housed but also contributes to reducing regional homelessness. Recent Point-in-Time data shows homelessness in the NY-505 region increased by over 25% in the last year alone, with Onondaga County now accounting for 64% of the area’s homeless population. • Design, Sustainability, and Community Integration Jordan Landing incorporates sustainable design and green building practices to meet New York State Homes and Community Renewal (HCR)’s 2025 sustainability guidelines. The project will meet Enterprise Green Communities 2020 Plus standards and conduct HVAC commissioning to ensure long-term energy efficiency. Each building is two stories and wood-frame construction. The buildings are sited to avoid any disturbance to nearby DEC and USACE-regulated wetlands, although minor grading in the 100- foot buffer will be permitted under a forthcoming NYSDEC permit. The surrounding landscape, including a nearby forested wetland and the Erie Canal Trail, will offer residents access to nature and recreation. A central playground, walkable sidewalks, and adjacent public spaces further enhance the community-oriented design. • Location and Market Fit
Jordan Landing is well-positioned within commuting distance of several regional employment
hubs, including the forthcoming Micron Facility in Clay (30 minutes away), Downtown Syracuse
(30 minutes), and Auburn (20 minutes). Though public transit is limited, Eagle Star will provide
transportation services for supportive housing residents, and Onondaga County’s Dial-a-Ride
program offers transit options for seniors and people with disabilities.
Market conditions strongly support the development. Adjacent affordable housing—developed
and managed by Rock PMC—remains fully occupied with long waiting lists. A recent market
study found a favorable 10.44% capture rate and underscored stable rents and minimal vacancy
in both market-rate and affordable housing sectors. With a rising population of people
experiencing homelessness, especially veterans and individuals with SMI, Jordan Landing is a
timely and much-needed intervention.
• Site, Zoning, and Environmental Considerations
The Project Site was made up of three parcels: # 006.1-01-03.1, 006.1-01-04.1, and 006.1-01-
05.0. At the August 20th Planning Board Meeting the Board passed a resolution consolidating
these lots into one parcel which is expected to retain the 006.1-01-03.1 SBL number and has
been confirmed to be addressed as 577 Peru Road. The Village of Jordan Planning Board
2
Page 45 of 242
granted final site plan approval in August 2025. The land is free of environmental hazards, and
any work near the wetlands will proceed under proper permitting.
• Development Team and Financing
This collaborative effort brings together trusted partners:
• Eagle Star Housing (Applicant, majority owner, service provider)
• Rock PMC (Property Manager, municipal approvals lead)
• Rockabill Development (Financing, construction closing, and coordination)
• Bowes REDC (Predevelopment consultant)
• Libolt & Sons / AHC (General Contractor)
• Holmes King Kallquist (Architect)
• Canon Heyman & Weiss (Legal counsel)
Financing sources include:
• 9% State and Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits
• NYS Supportive Housing Opportunity Program Funds
• $250,000 from OCHIP
• Equity from Key Bank (tax credit investor and lender)
• Deferred Developer Fee from Project Developers
Timeline and Readiness
Jordan Landing is development-ready. Key milestones are as follows:
• March 2026 – HCR Awards
• August 2026 – Financial closing and construction start
• March 2028 – Construction completion and lease-up begins
• September 2028 – Full occupancy
• December 2028 – Permanent closing
The only outstanding municipal item is a building permit, expected within 4–6 weeks of
application. The NYSDEC permit process for minor grading in the buffer zone will be underway
in fall 2025, with approvals anticipated within five months.
3
Page 46 of 242
Section II: H) Local Approvals
Attached please find a letter from the Village of Jordan outlining the approvals received
as well as the SEQR. Please note that the total acreage of the property is 7.84 and the
total square footage of the buildings is 74,203. Attached is a survey, site plans and
building plans.
Page 47 of 242
Page 48 of 242
Page 49 of 242
Agency Use Only [If applicable]
Full Environmental Assessment Form Project :
Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date :
Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency=s reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity.
If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
Tips for completing Part 2:
• Review all of the information provided in Part 1.
• Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook.
• Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2.
• If you answer “Yes” to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section.
• If you answer “No” to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question.
• Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact.
• Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency
checking the box “Moderate to large impact may occur.”
• The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis.
• If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the general
question and consult the workbook.
• When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the Awhole action@.
• Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts.
• Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project.
1. Impact on Land
Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, NO YES
✔
the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 2.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d 9
✔ 9
less than 3 feet.
b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f 9
✔ 9
c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or E2a 9
✔ 9
generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface.
d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a 9
✔ 9
of natural material.
e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year D1e 9
✔ 9
or in multiple phases.
f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical D2e, D2q 9
✔ 9
disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides).
g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B1i 9
✔ 9
h. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ 9 9
___________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 10
Page 50 of 242 FEAF 2019
2. Impact on Geological Features
The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit
access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, NO
✔ YES
minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, move on to Section 3.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: ________________________________ E2g 9 9
___________________________________________________________________
b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c 9 9
registered National Natural Landmark.
Specific feature: _____________________________________________________
c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9
___________________________________________________________________
3. Impacts on Surface Water
The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water ✔
NO YES
bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - l. If “No”, move on to Section 4.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, D1h 9 9
b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a D2b 9 9 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a 9 9 from a wetland or water body. d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h 9 9 tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, D2a, D2h 9 9 runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal D2c 9 9 of water from surface water. g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge D2d 9 9 of wastewater to surface water(s). h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e 9 9 stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h 9 9 downstream of the site of the proposed action. j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q, E2h 9 9 around any water body. k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, D1a, D2d 9 9 wastewater treatment facilities.
Page 2 of 10
Page 51 of 242
l. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ 9 9
___________________________________________________________________
4. Impact on groundwater
The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or ✔
NO YES
may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer.
(See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 5.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand D2c 9 9
on supplies from existing water supply wells.
b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c 9 9
withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer.
Cite Source: ________________________________________________________
c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and D1a, D2c 9 9 sewer services. d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E2l 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c, E1f, 9 9 where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. E1g, E1h f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products D2p, E2l 9 9 over ground water or an aquifer. g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 E2h, D2q, 9 9 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2l, D2c h. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________
5. Impact on Flooding
The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. NO
✔ YES
(See Part 1. E.2)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, move on to Section 6.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i 9 9
b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j 9 9
c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k 9 9
d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage D2b, D2e 9 9
patterns.
e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, 9 9
E2j, E2k
f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, E1e 9 9
or upgrade?
Page 3 of 10
Page 52 of 242
g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________
9 9
___________________________________________________________________
6. Impacts on Air
The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source.
✔ NO YES
(See Part 1. D.2.f., D.2.h, D.2.g)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, move on to Section 7.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may
also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels:
i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) D2g 9 9
ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N2O) D2g 9 9
iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) D2g 9 9
iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) D2g 9 9
D2g 9 9
v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of
hydrochloroflourocarbons (HFCs) emissions
vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2h 9 9
b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g 9 9 hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions D2f, D2g 9 9 rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU=s per hour. d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in “a” through “c”, D2g 9 9 above. e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s 9 9 ton of refuse per hour. f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 __________________________________________________________________
7. Impact on Plants and Animals
The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.) NO
✔ YES
If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 8.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E2o 9 9
threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal
government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site.
b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2o 9 9
any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal
government.
c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p 9 9
species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the
Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site.
d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p 9 9
any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or
the Federal government.
Page 4 of 10
Page 53 of 242
e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural E3c 9 9
Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect.
f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any E2n 9 9
portion of a designated significant natural community.
Source: ____________________________________________________________
g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or
E2m 9 9
over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site.
h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, 9 9
E1b
grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat.
Habitat type & information source: ______________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of D2q 9 9
herbicides or pesticides.
j. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9
__________________________________________________________________
8. Impact on Agricultural Resources
The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) ✔
NO YES
If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 9.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c, E3b 9 9
NYS Land Classification System.
b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land E1a, Elb 9 9
(includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc).
c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b 9 9
active agricultural land.
d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural E1b, E3a 9 9
uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10
acres if not within an Agricultural District.
e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a, E1b 9 9
management system.
f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development C2c, C3, 9 9
potential or pressure on farmland. D2c, D2d
g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c 9 9
Protection Plan.
h. Other impacts: ________________________________________________________ 9 9
Page 5 of 10
Page 54 of 242
9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources
The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in ✔
NO YES
sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and
a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.1.b, E.3.h.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 10.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local E3h 9 9
scenic or aesthetic resource.
b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant E3h, C2b 9 9
screening of one or more officially designated scenic views.
c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h
i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) 9 9
ii. Year round 9 9
d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h
action is:
E2q,
i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work 9 9
ii. Recreational or tourism based activities E1c 9 9
e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h 9 9
appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource.
f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed D1a, E1a, 9 9
project: D1f, D1g
0-1/2 mile
½ -3 mile
3-5 mile
5+ mile
g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9
__________________________________________________________________
10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources
The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological NO
✔ YES
resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 11.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous
to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on the National or E3e 9 9
State Register of Historical Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner
of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for
listing on the State Register of Historic Places.
b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f 9 9
to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory.
c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g 9 9
to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory.
Source: ____________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 10
Page 55 of 242
d. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9
__________________________________________________________________
If any of the above (a-d) are answered “Moderate to large impact may
e. occur”, continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3:
i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e, E3g, 9 9
of the site or property. E3f
ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property’s setting or E3e, E3f, 9 9
integrity. E3g, E1a,
E1b
iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e, E3f, 9 9
are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3g, E3h,
C2, C3
11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation
The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a NO
✔ YES
reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted
municipal open space plan.
(See Part 1. C.2.c, E.1.c., E.2.q.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 12.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or “ecosystem D2e, E1b 9 9
services”, provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater E2h,
storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, E2o,
E2n, E2p
b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, E1c, 9 9
C2c, E2q
c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c 9 9
with few such resources. E1c, E2q
d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c, E1c 9 9
community as an open space resource.
e. Other impacts: _____________________________________________________ 9 9
_________________________________________________________________
12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas
The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical NO
✔ YES
environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, go to Section 13.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or E3d 9 9
characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA.
b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d 9 9
characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA.
c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9
__________________________________________________________________
Page 7 of 10
Page 56 of 242
13. Impact on Transportation
The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. ✔
NO YES
(See Part 1. D.2.j)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 14.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j 9 9
b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j 9 9
more vehicles.
c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j 9 9
d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j 9 9
e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j 9 9
f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9
__________________________________________________________________
14. Impact on Energy
The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. NO
✔ YES
(See Part 1. D.2.k)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 15.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k 9 9
b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission D1f, 9 9
or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a D1q, D2k
commercial or industrial use.
c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k 9 9
d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square D1g 9 9
feet of building area when completed.
e. Other Impacts: ________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light
The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. NO
✔ YES
(See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 16.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m 9 9
regulation.
b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, E1d 9 9
hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home.
c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o 9 9
Page 8 of 10
Page 57 of 242
d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n 9 9
e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing D2n, E1a 9 9
area conditions.
f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9
__________________________________________________________________
16. Impact on Human Health
The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure ✔
NO YES
to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - m. If “No”, go to Section 17.
Relevant No,or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may cccur occur
a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day E1d 9 9
care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community.
b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. E1g, E1h 9 9
c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site E1g, E1h 9 9 remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the E1g, E1h 9 9 property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place E1g, E1h 9 9 to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t 9 9 generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, E1f 9 9 management facility. h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, E1f 9 9 i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of D2r, D2s 9 9 solid waste. j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of E1f, E1g 9 9 a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. E1h
k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill E1f, E1g 9 9
site to adjacent off site structures.
l. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the D2s, E1f, 9 9
project site. D2r
m. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Page 9 of 10
Page 58 of 242
17. Consistency with Community Plans
The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. NO
✔ YES
(See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, go to Section 18.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action’s land use components may be different from, or in sharp C2, C3, D1a 9 9
contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). E1a, E1b
b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village C2 9 9
in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%.
c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 9 9
d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use C2, C2 9 9
plans.
e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3, D1c, 9 9
supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. D1d, D1f,
D1d, Elb
f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4, D2c, D2d 9 9
that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j
g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or C2a 9 9
commercial development not included in the proposed action)
h. Other: _____________________________________________________________ 9 9
__________________________________________________________________
18. Consistency with Community Character
The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. NO
✔ YES
(See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part I small to large
Question(s) impact impact may
may occur occur
a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas E3e, E3f, E3g 9 9
of historic importance to the community.
b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 9 9
schools, police and fire)
c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2, C3, D1f 9 9
there is a shortage of such housing. D1g, E1a
d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 9 9
or designated public resources.
e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2, C3 9 9
character.
f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 9 9
E1a, E1b
E2g, E2h
g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9
__________________________________________________________________
PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10
Page 59 of 242
Page 60 of 242
KEPLINGER
FREEMAN
ASSOCIATES
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & LAND PLANNING
6320 FLY ROAD, SUITE 109 EAST SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13057
PHONE: (315) 445-7980
PB SUBMISSION
6/4/2025
NOT FOR
0 125 250 375 CONSTRUCTION
SCALE IN FEET
REV DATE : DRAWN DESCRIPTION :
No : BY :
1 6/4/25 JPR MISC. REVISIONS
2 7/2/25 JPR BUS PARKING AREA
ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT, AND SHALL BE USED
ONLY ON THE JOB DESIGNATED. COPYRIGHT C
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS
AT THE SITE AND PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE
ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.
JOB NO: 25014
DATE: 05/07/2025
DRAWN BY: JPR
CHECKED BY: EGK
SCALE: AS SHOWN
PROJECT NORTH
DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT. ANY SUCH ALTERATIONS SHALL BE NOTED, SEALED, AND SIGNED BY THE ALTERING ARCHITECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF PART 69.5(b).
PART 69.5(b) OF THE TITLE VIII EDUCATION LAW OF NEW YORK PROHIBITS ANY AND ALL ALTERATIONS TO THIS DRAWING OR DOCUMENT BY ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE
HOLMES KING KALLQUIST
575 North Salina Street, Syracuse, NY 13208
Fax: (315) 476 - 5420
& Associates, Architects, LLP
www.hkkarchitects.com
577 PERU ROAD, JORDAN, NEW YORK
JORDAN LANDING
NEW CONSTRUCTION
Ph: (315) 476 - 8371
PHOTO BOARD
Page 61 of 242
L9.1
8/28/2025 5:40:47 PM
C:\Users\clounsbery\Documents\revit files\R25_25014_Jordan Landing_central_20250821_clounsbery.rvt
BUILD
Showing the first 80 of 606 passages — read the complete text.