Typeset from the official record — motions and recorded votes are detected automatically. The official copy governs.
Town of Clay Planning Board Meeting January 25, 2017
APPROVED
The regular meeting of the Planning Board of the Town of Clay, County of Onondaga held at Town Hall located at 4401 State Route 31, Clay, New York on the 25" day of January 2017 The meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Guinup at 7:30 PM and upon roll being called, the following were:
PRESENT: Karen Guinup Chairwoman
Russ Mitchell Deputy Chairman
Hal Henty Member
Allen Kovac Member
Michelle Borton Member
James Palumbo Member
Brian Hall Member
Cindy Beckhusen Deputy Commissioner of Planning
Ron DeTota C&S Engineers
Scott Chatfield Planning Board Attorney
Gloria Wetmore Planning Board Secretary
ABSENT: = Mark Territo Commissioner of Planning & Development
A motion was made by Al Kovac seconded by Brian Hall to approve the minutes of the
previous meeting.
Motion Carried 7-0
**7:30 P.M. Case #2016-055 — Moyers Corners Fire Department(3) — Amended Site Plan — 7200 Henry Clay Blvd.
Karen opened the public hearing, Ed Keplinger of Keplinger, Freeman & Associates and Mark Geottle were present for the applicant. Mr. Keplinger explained the plan, they propose 2 small additions, they will renovate the interior, extend the parking, 40 ft side walk and dumpster enclosure. The applicant received a variance for setbacks. Karen asked if the dumpster enclosure will match the building. Mr. Keplinger said yes, it will be brick. Karen said they will need a gate detail. The county comments were modifications, the concrete pad. No signs in the right of way. SWPPP. The County wants a lighting plan, they didn’t get county comments back about lighting. Signs will be a separate permitting process. Karen opened it up to the board.
1
Town of Clay Planning Board Meeting January 25, 2017
Jim Palumbo said there are poles right on the property line. One foot candles.
Ron said the sewer outlet structure is unusual, it’s very large. This will need to be looked at some more.
Karen said to make sure the easement is shown on the plan.
A motion was made by Brian Hall seconded by Al Kovac to adjourn this case to the
February 8, 2017 meeting.
Motion Carried 7-0
**7:35 P.M. Case #2016-061 — Bonnie Marini, Shear Perfection (3) — Amended Site Plan — 7452 Oswego Road.
A motion was made by Brian Hall seconded by Jim Palumbo to adjourn this case to the
February 22, 2017 meeting.
Motion Carried 7-0
*#7:40 P.M. Case #2017-001 — New Court Street, LLC. (3) — Site Plan — 8531 Oswego Road.
Karen opened the hearing; Brian Bouchard of CHA explained the plan, received the approval for the Zone Change from the Town Board. They will renovate the existing building. There will be new asphalt driveway as well as parking. The bio retention pond will be in the back of the site, as well as a berm.
The sheds have been removed from the plan. The Septic has been looked at and will accommodate the existing building and the addition. The addition will have no sprinklers; therefore the applicant will add a fire hydrant. They will install an 8 foot fence along the back, the building will have split face block and so will the addition.
Karen said the code only allows a 7 foot fence without a variance. She referred to the code page 230.77.
Karen said the Board needs a trip generation as well as the DEC letter for the file. Karen explained there can no longer be storm water ponds in a landscape buffer.
Karen said the county comments included modifications, No parking, loading or backing up into the County right of way. And just a reminder I-1 activity has to be inside the buildings. Structure design has to be compatible to Surrounding and adjacent property.
Karen opened it up to the Board. Michelle asked if they had received a letter from SHPO. Brian said they had.
Ron had some comments on stormwater; he will work with the applicant on the issues. Town of Clay Planning Board Meeting January 25, 2017
Russ Mitchell asked for the landscape spacing around the storm water pond. Brian said the trees are 10 feet on center. Jim Palumbo said if you plant 4ft to 6ft trees they will fill in within 5 years and have a better chance of surviving.
A motion was made by Michelle Borton seconded by Jim Palumbo to adjourn this
hearing to the 2/22/2017 meeting.
Motion Carried 7-0
(Adjourned from 9 previous meetings)
Karen opened the hearing. Karen explained that Michelle Borton has prepared a complete EAF for a Conditional Negative Declaration, Attached.
A motion was made by Michelle Borton seconded by Hal Henty to approve a SEQR
for Case#2016-008 — Fox Dealership Site Plan - located at 3687 NYS Route 31 that although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be substantially mitigated because of the following conditions: The Applicant must obtain and comply with all required permits and approvals, including the Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit for wetlands disturbance/mitigation, NYSDEC Water Quality Certification, New York State Department of Transportation ingress/egress approval, Town of Clay acceptance of the project's SWPPP and full compliance with SDPES General Permit GP-0-15-002 for Construction Activity. There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and therefore, this conditional negative declaration is issued.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Hal Henty seconded by Al Kovac to adjourn this case to the
March 8, 2017.
Motion Carried 7-0
— 7435 Oswego Rd., — Site Plan (Adjourned from | previous meeting).
A motion was made by Russ Mitchell seconded by Brian Hall to adjourn this case to the
February 8, 2017 meeting.
Motion Carried 7-0
Town of Clay Planning Board Meeting January 25, 2017
Road. (Adjourned from 2 previous meetings).
A motion was made by Russ Mitchell seconded by Al Kovac to adjourn this case to the
July 12, 2017 meeting.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Michelle Borton seconded by Russ Mitchell to add this case to
the agenda.
Motion Carried 7-0
Karen asked Ron DeTota if he had looked over the plan, Ron said everything was fine with the plan.
A motion was made by Al Kovac seconded by Hal Henty using standard form # 40 Final
Plat approval, for Case # 2016-020- Stewart’s Shops- 7576 Buckley Road , Drawing # 7697 dated 12/16/2014 revised 01/03/2017.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Brian Hall seconded by Al Kovac to add this case to the agenda.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Brian Hall seconded by Hal Henty using standard form # 40 Final
Plat approval, for Case # 2016-032- Estates at Wildflower — section #2 - Eldan Homes, Drawings by Ianuzi and Romans dated and numbered 07/07/2016 revised 09/15/2016 file # 847.095.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Russ Mitchell seconded by Michelle Borton to adjourn the
meeting at 8:50 P.M.
Town of Clay Planning Board Meeting January 25, 2017
Motion Carried 7-0
Gloria Wetmore
Agency Use Only [If applicable]
Full Environmental Assessment Form Project : [Fox Dealership Sto tan Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts date: [January 25, 2017
Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. Wé recognize that the lead agency's reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part | that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity.
If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment.
Tips for completing Part 2:
¢ Review all of the information provided in Part 1.
¢ Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. e Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2.
¢ — Ifyou answer “Yes” to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. ¢ Ifyou answer “No” to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. ¢ Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. ¢ Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box “Moderate to large impact may occur.” ¢ — The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. ‘e If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook. .
¢ When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the “whole action’. ¢ Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. ¢ _ Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project.
Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, Ne) VIYES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1)
If “Yes”, answer questions a -j. If “No”, move on to Section 2.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d oO a less than 3 feet.
b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f 74) Oo c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or E2a Yi im generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface.
d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons | D2a 74] oO of natural material.
e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year | Dle 74] Oo or in multiple phases.
f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical D2e, D2q Oo "4] disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. Bli 74) o
h. Other impacts: Oo Oo
The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, VINO CIYEs minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) ,
If “Yes”, answer questions a-c. If “No”, move on to Section 3.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur
a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: E2g o oO b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c a a registered National Natural Landmark.
Specific feature:
c. Other impacts: o a
The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water NT) VIVES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) If “Yes”, answer questions a- 1. If “No”, move on to Section 4.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may
: NERO Juss : ey : : may occur occur
a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, Dih [v4] Oo
b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a D2b 7 Oo 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water.
c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a 74] Oo from a wetland or water body.
d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h Oo 4] tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body.
e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, | D2a, D2h oO "4 runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments.
f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal | D2c Zi oO of water from surface water.
g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge | D2d 174] Oo of wastewater to surface water(s).
h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e Oo Z stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies.
i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h Oo v4) downstream of the site of the proposed action.
j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q, E2h 74) Oo around any water body.
k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, Dla, D2d Z oO
wastewater treatment facilities.
1, Other impacts: oO
The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or VINo C]YEs may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) .
If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 5.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur
a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand | D2c a a on supplies from existing water supply wells.
b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c a is) withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. :
Cite Source:
c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and | Dla, D2c a a sewer services.
d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E21 aq 9
e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations | D2c, Elf, is} a where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. Elg, Elh
f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products | D2p, E21 o a over ground water or an aquifer.
g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 | E2h, D2q, is) Q feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2I, D2c
h. Other impacts: a o
The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. (No VIYES (See Part 1. E.2)
If “Yes”, answer questions a-g. If “No”, move on to Section 6.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small tolarge © +| Question(s) impact impact may i may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i 14) oO b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j V4] O c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k 1%] Oo d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage D2b, D2e 74] oO patterns.
e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, F2i, 1") | E2j, E2k :
f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, | Ele vA} Oo or upgrade?
g. Other impacts:
oO Oo
6; Impacts on Air
The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. [YINO []YEs (See Part 1. D.2.f., D,2,h, D.2.g)
If “Yes”, answer questions a-f. If “No”, move on to Section 7.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO,) D2g o a ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (NO) D2g Q a iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) D2g a a iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF¢) D2g a 5 v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of D2g a a hydrochloroflourocarbons (HFCs) emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2h a o ‘b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g a a hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants.
¢. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions | D2f, D2g a oO rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU’s per hour.
d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in “a” through “c”, D2g a Oo above. :
e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 | D2s a o ton of refuse per hour.
f. Other impacts: Oo a
The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.) [No VIYES If “Yes”, answer questions a-j. If “No”, move on to Section 8. :
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E20 Z o threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by | E20 74) Oo any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government, c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any | E2p v4} oO species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p 4] Oo
any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government.
e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural E3c Z oO Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any E2n 74] oO portion of a designated significant natural community. :
Source:
g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or E2m g g
over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site.
h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, Elb 174] oO grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat.
Habitat type & information source:
i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of | D2q v4] Oo herbicides or pesticides.
j. Other impacts: o o
The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) [VINO Lys
If “Yes”, answer questions a -h. If “No”, move on to Section 9.
pie Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may ran eee may occur occur
a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c, E3b is} o NYS Land Classification System.
b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land Ela, Elb o a (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc).
c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of | E3b a a active agricultural land.
d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural Elb, E3a ia) a uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District.
e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land Ela, Elb a a management system.
f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development C2c, C3, a) is) potential or pressure on farmland. D2c, D2d
g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c is) o Protection Plan.
h. Other impacts: ia) a
The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in VINO C]vEs sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.1.b, E.3.h.)
if “Yes "answer questions a-g. if “No”, go to Section 10.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large | Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local | E3h a o scenic or aesthetic resource.
b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant E3h, C2b a Oo screening of one or more officially designated scenic views.
c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) a ia) ii. Year round a a d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the. proposed E3h action is: ‘ E2q i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work , o a ii. Recreational or tourism based activities Elc o o e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h a a appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource.
f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed Dia, Ela, o a project: DIf, Dlg 0-1/2 mile %-3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile
g. Other impacts: oO Oo
The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological [Jno [VIYES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section Il.
: ACER IE ST SE ae Relevant No, or Moderate PartI small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur
a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous | E3e 174) Oo
to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been
nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or
National Register of Historic Places.
b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous | E3f Oo a
to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory.
c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous | E3g v4) Oo
to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory.
Source:
d. Other impacts: im] oO
If any of the above (a-d) are answered “Moderate to large impact may ©. occur”, continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3:
i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e, E3g, oO of the site or property. E3f ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property’s setting or E3e, E3f, Oo 4 integrity. E3g, Ela, Elb iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which | E3e, E3f, oO are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3g, E3h,
The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a [Y]JNO [_]yes reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan.
(See Part 1. C.2.c, E.1.c., E.2.q.)
Sf "Yes", er questio e. If “No”, go to Section 12.
: es COU Relevant No, or Moderate | — Part! small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or “ecosystem | D2e, Elb Q a services”, provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater | E2h, storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, E20, E2n, E2p b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. | C2a, Ele, a fa] C2c, E2q c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c o oO with few such resources. Elc, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2e, Ele a o community as an open space resource.
e. Other impacts: a o
The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical NO [] YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d)
If “Yes”, answer questions a-c. If “No”, go to Section 13.
Relevant No, or Moderate Sa} Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur
a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or E3d o a characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA.
b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d a o characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA.
c. Other impacts: a o
The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. [_]No IV] Yes (See Part 1. D.2,j)
if “Yes”, answer questions a -f If “No”, go to Section 14.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large a Question(s) impact impact may whe ALES at . f may occur occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j i?) Oo b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j A) Oo more vehicles.
c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j Y o d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j 74] oO e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j Z o
f. Other impacts: oO oO
The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. [_]No (VIYEs (See Part 1. D.2.k)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 15.
Q Part I small to large | Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k Y O b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission | DIf, 4] oO
or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to servea | Dlq, D2k commercial or industrial use.
c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k 4 oO
d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square | Dig 14) oO feet of building area when completed.
e. Other Impacts: oO oO
The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. {Jno [VIveEs (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and 0.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a-f. If “No”, go to Section 16.
Relevant No, or Moderate Partl small to large Question(s) impact impact may : * aan _ may occur occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m iA) o regulation.
b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, Eld 4) oOo hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home.
c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o Y Oo
d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n "| Oo
e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing D2n, Ela 4 Oo area conditions.
f. Other impacts: Oo oO
The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure Fal NO C] YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a-m._If “No”, go to Section 17.
ao Be Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may cccur occur
a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day Eld Qa is) care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community.
b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. Elg, Elh a a
c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site | Elg, Elh a a remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action.
d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the Elg, Elh is) o property (e.g., easement or deed restriction).
e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place Elg, Eth is} 0 to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health.
f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t o is) generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. ;
g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, Elf a oO management facility.
h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, Elf a a
i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of | D2r, D2s a a solid waste.
j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of | Elf, Elg o a a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Elh
k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill Elf, Elg a a site to adjacent off site structures.
I. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the D2s, Elf, i) a project site. . D2r m. Other impacts:
The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. [Y|No [_]ves (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a-h. If “No”, go to Section 18.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may
a3 ie : : __| may occur occur
a. The proposed action’s land use components may be different from, or in sharp C2, C3, Dla o ia) contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). Ela, Elb
b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village | C2 ia} a in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%.
c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 ia] a
d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use | C2, C2 o a plans.
e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3, Dic, in) o supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. Did, Dif,
Did, Elb
f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development | C4, D2c, D2d Qo 5 that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j
g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or | C2a a a commercial development not included in the proposed action)
h. Other: a a
The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. {_]No [V]YES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3)
Jf "Yes", answer questions a-g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large we doe ek . : oo. Question(s) impact impact may : ; ge ORE ot : may occur occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas E3e, E3f, E3g Zi o of historic importance to the community.
b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 u Oo schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where | C2, C3, DIf 4] Oo there is a shortage of such housing. Dig, Ela d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized | C2, E3 74] oO or designated public resources.
e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2, C3 Z o character.
f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 14) o Ela, Elb E2g, E2h g. Other impacts: v4) Oo
PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10
Project : |Fox Dealership - Site Plan
Date : [january 25, 2017
Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance
Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact.
Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance.
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
To complete this section:
¢ . Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact.
¢ — Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur.
e The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes.
e Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact.
e Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact
e For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result.
¢ Attach additional sheets, as needed.
All potential moderate-to-large environmental impacts identified in Part Il of the EAF will be addressed or mitigated through Local, State, and Federal permitting and approvals processes.
Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
SEQR Status: C1 Type 1 [V1 unlisted
Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: [¥] Part 1 (71 Part 2 [V7] Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the Town of Clay Planning Board as lead agency that:
(1) A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued.
[7] B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency:
dis isturbance/mitigation NYSDEC Water Quality Certification New York State Sepanment of Transportation ingresslegress approval, Town of Clay acceptance of the project's SWPPP and full compliance with SDPES General Permit GP-0-15-002 for Construction Activity.
There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617.d).
(1 C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued.
Name of Action: Fox Dealership - Site Plan Name of Lead Agency: Town of Clay Planning Board
Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Karen Guinup
Title of Responsible Officer: planning Board Chairman
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date:
Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Date:
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Mark Territo, Commissioner of Planning Address: Town of Clay, 4401 Route 31, Clay, NY 13041 Telephone Number: (315) 652-3800
E-mail: planning@townofclay.org For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to:
Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (e.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any)
Applicant (if any)
Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://Awww.dec.ny.gov/enb/enb.html
PRINT FULL FORM Page 2 of 2