Typeset from the official record — motions and recorded votes are detected automatically. The official copy governs.
Organizational and Regular Meeting Planning Board Town of Clay January 11, 2017
APPROVED
The Organizational and Regular Meeting of the Planning Board of the Town of Clay, County of Onondaga held at Town Hall located at 4401 State Route 31, Clay, New York on the 11" day of January 2017 The meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Guinup at 7:30 PM and upon roll being called, the following were:
PRESENT: Karen Guinup Chairwoman
Russ Mitchell Deputy Chairman Hal Henty Member Allen Kovac Member Michelle Borton Member James Palumbo Member Brian Hall Member Mark Territo Commissioner of Planning & Development Ron DeTota C&S Engineers Scott Chatfield Planning Board Attorney Gloria Wetmore Planning Board Secretary
Organizational Items for the year_2017
A motion was made by Russ Mitchell seconded by Jim Palumbo to appoint C&S
Engineers as the Planning Board Engineer for the year 2017.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Hal Henty seconded by Al Kovac to appoint Scott Chatfield as
the Planning Board Attorney for the year 2017.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Michelle Borton seconded by Russ Mitchell to appoint Gloria
Wetmore as the Planning Board Secretary for the year 2017.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Karen Guinup seconded by Hal Henty to approve the Planning
Board Meeting Calendar for the year 2017 as follows; the second and fourth Wednesdays of the month at 7:30 PM with only | meeting in June, August, and November.
Organizational and Regular Meeting Planning Board Town of Clay January 11, 2017
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Karen Guinup seconded by Al Kovac to appoint Russ Mitchell
as the Deputy Chairperson to the Planning Board for the year 2017.
Motion Carried 7-0
Regular Meeting Items
A motion was made by Al Kovac seconded by Russ Mitchell to approve the minutes of
the previous meeting.
Motion Carried 7-0
**7:30 P.M. Case #2016-035- Goddard Development Partners IV, LLC (Mavis Discount Tire) (3) — 7435 Oswego Rd., — Site Plan
A motion was made by Al Kovac seconded by Russ Mitchell to adjourn this case to the
January 25, 2017 meeting.
Motion Carried 7-0
*7:35 P.M.Case #2016-049 — Syracuse Brick House, Inc., (5) — Special Permit Referral — 4567 Crossroads Park Dr.
Jim Palumbo recused himself from this case and left the board.
Michelle Borton stated that she is employed part-time by an engineering firm that has a business relationship with DASNY. I am not involved in the firm’s DASNY work, my compensation is not dependent on that work, and it will have no bearing on my decisions for this case.
Karen opened the public hearing, Jeremy Klemanski, of Syracuse Brick House explained the plan. The plan is for a two story renovation. This will be an inpatient drug and alcohol rehabilitation center. They will renovate the first and second floors, add a second elevator and will add solar. They will remove some parking and add green space for recreational areas.
Karen said there were no issues with the County comments. Karen opened it up to the Board members.
2
Organizational and Regular Meeting Planning Board Town of Clay January 11, 2017
Russ asked if this was a relocation of an existing center, Mr. Klemanski said they do not
have a facility like this nearby; people are on a waiting list. Russ asked if this would be a Tully Hill type facility. Mr. Klemanski said Tully Hill has outpatient and this is inpatient only. They will also receive medical care if needed. Russ said there is a real need for this type of facility.
Karen asked if there were any comments or questions, hearing none she closed the Public Hearing.
A motion was made by Russ Mitchell seconded by Brian Hall using standard form #60 to
approve a favorable recommendation to the Town Board for Case #2016-049 — Syracuse Brick House, Inc., (5) — Special Permit Referral —- 4567 Crossroads Park Dr.
Motion Carried 6-0
Jim Palumbo returned to the Board at 8:15 PM.
*7:40 P.M. Case #2016-050 — 8302 Oswego Road, LLC (5) — Zone Change Referral — 8302 Oswego Road.
Karen opened the public hearing; Robert Aluzzo applicant explained the plan.
The property is located just south of the new SOS building. Karen asked if the house was still on the site, he said the house and the garage have been removed the slab is still there. Ron DeTota asked if Mr. Aluzzo would be willing to dedicate a portion of the road to the Town for access to the Dam. Karen said this would have no bearing on the Zone Change, Mr. Aluzzo said he is worried about having enough room on the site for the building plan.
Karen asked if there were any comments or questions, hearing none she closed the public hearing.
A motion was made by Russ Mitchell seconded by Al Kovac using standard form #50 to
approve a favorable recommendation to the Town Board for Case #2016-050 — 8302 Oswego Road, LLC (5) — Zone Change Referral — 8302 Oswego Road.
Motion Carried 7-0
**7:45 P.M. Case #2016-060 — North Syracuse Lodging Group, LLC, Town Place Suites Hotel (3) — Amended Site Plan — Pepperidge Way south of NYS Route 31.
Karen opened the Public Hearing; Brian Bouchard of CHA was present for the applicant. Brian explained the plan, they moved the building 18 feet to the east to make room for a patio. Karen said when there is outdoor seating to parking there has to be bollards,
3
Organizational and Regular Meeting Planning Board Town of Clay January 11,2017
Jim Palumbo asked if the plantings were the same as on the approved plan. Brian said they were.
Michelle Borton asked about the fire pit, is there a drawing of the fire pit and the specifications. Michelle also asked if there would be a separate permit for the fire pit.
Russ Mitchell asked why there are full sets of plans if this is only an amended site plan. There are no other changes. Brian said because they moved the building 18 feet it made changes on many other pages.
Jim said the detail sheet hasn’t changed but there are revision dates.
Karen closed the public hearing.
A motion was made by Michelle Borton seconded by Al Kovac move to adopt a
resolution using standard form #10, SEQR determination, for Case #2016-060 — North Syracuse Lodging Group, LLC, Town Place Suites Hotel (3) —- Amended Site Plan — Pepperidge Way south of NYS Route 31 that the proposed action is an unlisted action and does not involve any Federal agency. It is further determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was by Michelle Borton seconded by Jim Palumbo move to adopt a resolution using standard form #20 for Case #2016-60 — North Syracuse Lodging Group, LLC, Town Place Suites Hotel (3) — Amended Site Plan — Pepperidge Way south of NYS Route 31.
Motion Carried 7-0
Mendenhall Road intersection (Adjourned from 6 previous meetings)
Hal Henty recused himself from this case.
Joe Mastroiani was present for the applicant as well as Joseph Posey, legal counsel.
Mr. Mastroiani asked the board if they would approve a SEQR motion.
Karen Guinup opened it up to the board for SEQR determination.
Jim Palumbo said this has been before this Board many times. He is convinced that there are many items that need to be looked at. Jim said he is in favor of doing a Conditional Negative Declaration. The other five Board Members agreed.
4
Organizational and Regular Meeting Planning Board Town of Clay January 11, 2017
Jim Palumbo read the Full EAF, item by item.
A motion was made by Jim Palumbo seconded by Michelle Borton using standard form #
10, SEQR determination with a Conditional Negative Declaration for Case # 2016-013 - America Stores — It (3) - Site Plan - Oswego Road across from Mendenhall Road intersection. Town of Clay Planning Board being lead agency that: although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency.
permit.
2) The project shall successfully obtain all ACOE wetlands district permits as required.
3) The project shall receive NYS DEC water quality certification.
4) The Site Plan Satisfactorily demonstrates to the lead agency that site lighting will not negatively impact adjacent off site properties.
5) Site circulation shall accommodate and be accepted by emergency services, fire and police.
6) Architectural layout and character shall be satisfactory to the lead agency, pertaining to compatibility of surrounding characteristics.
Motion Carried 6-0
Hal Henty returned to the board at 9:15 PM.
Guy Young Road near Cicero Boarder. (Adjourned from 5 previous meetings)
Karen opened the hearing, Greg Card and Ray Brooks applicants were present,
Mr. Card explained the plan consists of 32 acres with a pond. There is a 4 lot subdivision; the wetland delineation was done as well as the archeological study and the drainage is done.
Karen read a letter from SHPO.
Karen pointed out a note on the plan that when the public road goes in they will close off
access to Guy Young Road.
Scott Chatfield said he will work with the applicant’s attorney to work up the agreement so that everyone knows this road has to go in on the east. The property is owned by Michael Bragman.
Karen closed the public hearing.
Organizational and Regular Meeting Planning Board Town of Clay January 11, 2017
A motion was made by Brian Hall seconded by Al Kovac to approve a SEQR motion
using standard form # 10 for Case #2016- 034—- Greg Card Property, Hidden Lake Woods (3) — Preliminary Plat- Guy Young Road near Cicero Border. That the proposed action is an unlisted action and does not involve any Federal agency. It is further determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment and that this resolution shall constitute a negative declaration for the following reasons.
1) Project supports neighborhood character.
2) Potential impacts for land, water, air and public health have been considered.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Brian Hall seconded by Al Kovac to approve a Preliminary Plat
using Standard form # 30 for Case #2016- 034— Greg Card Property, Hidden Lake Woods Preliminary Plat located at Guy Young Road near Cicero Border. Drawings by Ianuzi and Romans File # 3326.001 dated July 25, 2016 revised October 19, 2016. Approval is subject to all legal and engineering and upon completion of public road. Private drive will be relocated from Guy Young Road to the public road as shown on the map by Ianuzi and Romans. Possible road directly to the east of the applicant’s property.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Al Kovac seconded by Michelle Borton to add the Final Plat to
the agenda.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Al Kovac seconded by Hal Henty to approve a Final Plat using
standard form # 40 for Case # 2016- 034— Greg Card Property, Hidden Lake Woods Final Plat located at Guy Young Road near Cicero Border. Drawings by Ianuzi and Romans File # 3326.001 dated July 25, 2016 revised January 11, 2017. Approval is subject to all legal and engineering and upon completion of public road. Private drive will be relocated from Guy Young Road to the public road as shown on the map by Ianuzi and Romans. Possible road directly to the east of the applicant’s property.
Motion Carried 7-0
Closed Hearings - Board/Applicant discussions:
Yard — 8531 Oswego Road (Adjourned from 1 previous meeting)
Brian Bouchard of CHA was present for the applicant. He began they went before the
Zoning Board of Appeals for an interpretation for the definition of “Manufacturing” to
6
Organizational and Regular Meeting Planning Board Town of Clay January 11, 2017
see if it will allow for the retail sale of pre-manufactured storage sheds in an I-1 Industrial Zone. They were denied.
Karen asked where the sheds were currently, Mr. Bouchard said in front of the Property. Karen said the sheds are not allowed in this zone. The applicant is already using this as a contractor’s service yard, this still hasn’t been approved. Hal Henty agreed with Karen, they have been using this site as a contractor’s service for quite some time, Hal said if he had his way he would have shut down this operation. Brian apologized.
A motion was made by Michelle Borton seconded by Jim Palumbo to approve a SEQR
motion using standard form # 10 for Case #2016-048 — New Court St., LLC.(3) — Special Permit/Contractor’s Service Yard — 8531 Oswego Road.That the proposed action is an unlisted action and does not involve any Federal agency. It is further determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Michelle Borton seconded by Hal Henty to approve a Special
Permit using standard form #70 for Case #2016-048 — New Court St., LLC.(3) — Special Permit/Contractor’s Service Yard — 8531 Oswego Road. Drawings by Clough Harbor Associates file # C-101 dated October 24, 2016 revised January 11, 2017 this approval is Conditioned upon the applicant ceasing any illegal non conforming use. Removing all sheds from the site. In the event the illegal use continues the Special Permit will cease to exist.
Motion Carried 7-0
Signs
Metropolitan Signs Inc. — Edible Arrangements @ Marketfair — 4148 NYS 31 Zoned RC-1, Permit #47,908
1 — Wall sign — 17.91 square feet when 24.48 square feet is allowed. The proposed sign will meet the code.
A motion was made by Brian Hall seconded Jim Palumbo to approve the sign as
presented.
Motion Carried 7-0
A motion was made by Hal Henty seconded by Al Kovac to adjourn the meeting at 10:10
PM.
7
Organizational and Regular Meeting Planning Board Town of Clay January 11, 2017
Motion Carried 7-0
Respectfully submitted
hist)
Gloria Wetmore
Ageucy Use Uiuty [ies
CASE 3 ZL. = it
Fall Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance
Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question : in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significaat adverse environmental impact.
Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not
! have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next t page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance.
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
To complete this section:
° Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magaitude, Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact.
e Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur.
® The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes.
° Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is 2 need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result i in a significant adverse environmental impact.
* Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact
e For Conditional Negative Declarations iden:ify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse ci.vironmental impacts wi!! result.
« Attach additional sheets, as needed.
The poteatal modrak te farye CAV. wepecks qs robnfhed
Wt Fard- ode fois EAF ay need + be addessed Prrovsh processes of phe Local, Skk , and ot Fedora! peru dans
ayes Mrat ayphy,
Determination of Significance ~ Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
SEGR Siatus: [| Type 1 [Unlisted ; identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: [XJ Part 1 QR Part 2 BelPart 3
Upon review of the information recorded on AF, as noted, vius this additional support information “The_apelhcan Submutil c Dlapiric ete 4 (lag) boc men Sta res- (Ff Self fe fage HMaith oan Rte SY COS! Bae kl) ZL the Towa ak Cloy , C GiDhy F of Oni $e
and considering both the magnitude and importance of ach er.iified pgtentia! impact, it is the conclusion of the Tow) of C lay. Pla anias card as lead agency that:
([] A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued.
| B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or Fly mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: N7he plase Sar Shy au ue Copy ale: iy Dp hy tl h AYS SPDE ? Lreacta) oni # (6P. 2: 18002)
Zs : Ei JG
Adm iy. Lf (Tee Sif C} ula vashel be, aCe, Me Ee ere NC SCrVICS Gf ie ‘nd poled » ad): profkihes
, therefore, be no significant adverse conditioned, aad. therefo: police cofiditioned negative
wy tion is issu Chacochee: ey declaration be used only fo: hegyacep ions (see a NYCRR 617.d). roby ect rie hacocker Shall be ing e Sal Jegyacce em Lind oar (C opp be, cf yi eh Project may result in one i. more significant adverse impacts on td environment, and an en ronal impact 7’ Sufo eh statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued.
Name of Action: Site Plan Avra val Re view foc Amenta Shres- /t- Name of Lead Agency: Town ok Chay Yanan Board Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: leevess Tou wy) O a Cpr Yanni Roa rt
Title of Responsible Officer: Karen Gunyp ~ = Rlnnur Board ay woman
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date:
Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) _ Lepalt ra Date: ¢// Wy oxy Lp For Further Information:
Contact Person: Vie Dark Terria
adiess 440) Shale Lye. 3, Clo »NY (SOF!
Telephone Nampa 5 65 2- 3800
E-mail: ems @tovnaSeliry 708%
For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to:
Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (¢.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any)
Applicant (if any)
Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://www.dec.ny,gov/enb/enb.html
PRINT FULL FORM Page 2 of 2
Agency Use Only [IfApplicable}
Project : (Casa # 2616-013- America Sioras It Site Plan
Date: Penuery 11. 2017
. Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular ; clement of the proposed action will not, or may, result in 2 significant adverse environmental impact.
Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency mst decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse enivironnichtal iipéct. By completing thie certification on the next page, the lead agency cai complete its determination of significance.
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
To complete this section:
e — Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and descrize its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact.
¢ Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. .
¢ The assessment should take into consideration any design e!ement or project changes. e Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact.
© Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact
e For Conditionz! Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts wiil result.
° Attach additional sheets, as needed.
The potential moderate to large environmental impacts, as identified in Part Il of this EAF will need to be addressesd through processes of Local, State, and/or Federal permitting agencies that apply.
Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
SEQR Status: Cityper Unlisted
Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: [7] Part] Part 2 Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information
The applicants submiltal for the proposed site plan for America Stores-It Self Siorage Facuiity on |Courty Route 57 (Oswego Road) it in the 2 Town 1 of Clay, lOriondaga Counly- alin
and considering both the magnitude and importance of cach identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the Town of Clay Planning Board as lead agoncy that:
(J A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued.
B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency:
1, The project satisfy and completely comply with NYS SPEDES General Permit {GP-0-15-002) 2. The project shall successfully obtain all ACOE
Wetlands dist= permits as required:-3:“The project shall receiveNYS DEC Water Quality certification.
47-The Site Plarr shalt satisfactority demonstrate to the tead Ag ency site tighting wilt not impact adjacent properties:
5,-Site-circulation-shall-be-a: pled-by.ome 9 sonces{e-and plea
There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, :herefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617.d).
CJ C. This Project may resuit in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issucd.
Name of Action: Site Plan Approval Review for America Stores-It Name of Lead Agency: Town of Clay Plarining Board
Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Town of Clay Planning Board
Title of Responsible Officer: Karen Guinup- Planning Board Chairperson
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date:
Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) ENS ‘Ag Raw Date: January 11, 2017
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Mark Territo Address: 4401 NYS ROute 31, Clay, NY 13044 Telephone Number: 315-652-3800
E-mail: mterrito@townofclay.org For Type f Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to:
Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which ihe action will be principally located (¢.g.. Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (ifany)
Applicant (if any)
Environmental Notice Bulletin: http:/Avww.dec.ny.gov/enb/enb.hunl
PRINT FULL FORM Page 2 of 2
Agency Use Oniv (7 appiicabie}
sessment Farm Project: [CQSe# 20/6 -0/3 |
Pail Bavivonmenic:! Assessment Porm pga. |RSS) Port 2. Identificution of Potential Project impacts date. [6 =f Z2L17 | Part 2 is to be compieied by the lead ageucy. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency's reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part | that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity.
if the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment.
Tips for completing Part 2:
* Review all of the information provided in Part 1. .
e Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. oO _
e Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2.
¢ Ifyou answer “Yes” to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section.
® Ifyou answer “No” to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question.
° Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. *® Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency
checking the box “Moderate to large impact may occur.” © The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis.
» — Ifyou are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consu!: the workbook.
¢ When answering a question consider all. components of the proposed activity, that is, the “whole action”. e Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct umpacts. e _ Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1, Impact on Land | Proposed action may involve corstruction on, or physical alteration of, LINo [X{YEs the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) Jf “Yes”, answer questions a -j. If “No”, move on to Section 2.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may
may occur sccur
| 2. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is F2d
less than 3 feet. O pt _». The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f pt oO c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrouk is exposed, or | E2a : A oO generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface.
ad. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons | D2a 5 Oo of natural material.
2. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than ene year | Die ; { Oo or in multiple phases, . Sat Lop.
£. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whetl.cr from physical D2Ze, D2q a4] oO | disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). SMa) mp. g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. Bli ja oO
hn. Other impacts: oO oO
L
Pags tof 10
The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit
access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, JRINo (]YEs minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g)
If Yes”, answer questions a-c. If “No”, move on to Section 3.
Relevant No, or Mederate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may ; may oceur occur
a, Identify the specific land form(s) attached: E2g Oo oO b.-The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological-feature listed asa ----~-| E3e°---—-~ --}-—~ - O- os poo
registered National Natural Landmark.
Specific feature:
c. Other impacts: oOo Oo
The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water Ono JX[YEs bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) Sf “Yes”, answer questions a - i. If “No”, move on to Section 4.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may . nay occur occur a, The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, Dih i Oo b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a | D2b ww Oo 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water.
c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a i oO from a wetland or water body. a)! Ip.
7 d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h oO x tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body.
e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, | D2a,D2h pr Oo runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments.
f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal | D2c yz oO of water from surface water.
g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge | D2d i] oO of wastewater to surface water(s).
h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e w Gd stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies, i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or . E2h {y ? oO downstream of the site of the proposed action. Mayen't Seen Water quality vef- . 717 j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides inde D2q, E2h pe oO around any water body.
k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, Dla, D2d JA ima wastewater treatment facilities.
' . Other impacts:
- ne | qq
i Ld
L
[4 Impact on groundwater
i The proposed action may resuli in new or additional use of ground waier, or [XNo [ives | may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer.
(See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.1)
If “Yes”, answer questions a -h. If “No”, move on to Secticn 5,
i ; Relevant No, or Moderate Parti small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a, The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand | D2c 7 oD Oo on supplies from existing water supply wells. .
b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2e oO oO withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer.
Cite Source:
_ &. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and Dla, D2c o Oo sewer services.
4. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to sroundweter. | D2d, E21 O Oo e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c, Elf, o im where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. Elg, Elh £ The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products | D2p, E2I oO im over ground water or an aquifer.
g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 | E2h,-D2q, Oo Oo feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E21, D2c
h. Other impacts: oO im
The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. (No Jklves (See Part 1. E.2)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, move on io Section 6.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I smali to large . Question{s) | impact impact may | may occur oecur | a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i gE oO b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 vear floodplain. E2j El ma ¢. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k fe Ci ! . .
| d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage D2b, D2e Oo RB i patterns.
| 2. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, Ja im] E2j, E2k £ If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, | Ele Rl iat] or upgrade? :
g. Cther impacts: Q | gd
The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. Pave Lives (See Part 1. D.2.£,;D,2,h, D.2.2) Uf “Yes”, answer questions a -f. If “No”, move on to Section 7.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) | impact impact may may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may _ also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: == «5s | . _ i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) D2g Qo oOo ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N,O) D2g . ‘oO oO iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) D2g Qo Bl iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF.) D2g Go o v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of D2g hydrochloroflourocarbons (HFCs) emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2h o Oo b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g Oo o hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants, c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions D2f, Dag oO oO rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 Ibs. per hour, or may include a heat , source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU’s per hour.
d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in “a” through “c”, D2g oO oO above.
e, The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than! | D2s o QO ton of refuse per hour.
f. Other impacts: o o
7. Impact on Plants and Animals .
The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.) (No Kkfves If “Yes”, answer questions a-j. If “No”, move on to Section 8.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part! small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any | E20 XL, Oo threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal .| om imp. government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. |p fade tf b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E20 pl o any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal sm h 4) government. . iP :
c, The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any | E2p a oO species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the . . "_ Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. SM. | mp d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by | E2p 4 Oo any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or “ . the Federal government. SM, / Pp,
i | 8. The proposed aciion may diminisu the capacity of a vegisiered National Netre! Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect.
E3e qr4 Oo
£ The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any E2n = i] portion of a designated significant natural community.
| Source;
g. The Proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or F2 ‘ over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. ™ a o : h, The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acre. of forest, Elb = O
grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat.
Habitat type & information source:
i, Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of D2q - JB Oo herbicides or pesticides.
| j. Other impacts: o o
!
I | 8. Impact on Agricuitural Resources | The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See fart 1. E.3.a. and b.) JXno (ves Jf “Yes”, answer questions a -h. If “No”, move on to Section 9.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur
a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within sci! group 1 through 4 of the | E2c, E3b im oO NYS Land Classification System.
b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land Ela, Elb o im (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). :
¢, The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of | E3b- oO oO active agricultural land.
d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural Elb, E3a Oo Oo uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultura! District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District.
2. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agriculiural land Ela, Elb oO oO management system. ;
£. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development C2e, C3, oO im
|___ potential or pressure on farmland. D2c, D2d l
2. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C20 oO oO Protection Plan. :
h. Other impacts: oO oO
9, Impact on Aesthetic Resources. . . .
The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in Tino (TvEs sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.1.b, E.3.h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 10.
Reievant No, or Mederate
Part! small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local | E3h Oo o scenic or aesthetic resource.
b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant _ _| E3h, C2b oO _. Oo screening of one or more officially designated scenic views.
c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) oO Oo ii, Year round im im} d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h action is: E2q i, Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ° oO oO ii, Recreational or tourism based activities Ele oO oO e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h Oo im appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource.
f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed Dla, Ela, oO o project: Dif, Dig 0-1/2 mile %-3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile
g. Other impacts: : oO oO
The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological [Jno JK) ves resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.)
ia (> If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 11. ( hf ALP dives)
Relevant [ No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur
a, The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous | E3e pa oO
to, any buildings, archaeological site-or'district which is listed on or has been
nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or, , 6
National Register of Historic Places. IL desic n Changes the a re-sith Mn. imp.
iw . 7
b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, of substantially contiguous | E3f JA im]
to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic . er mapper
Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. (lee by Térresine! ) p € appe
7
c. The proposed action may, occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous | E3g jl Oo
to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inveutory.
Source:
aH. - . a Ci id, Other impacts: __ _, any of the sbove (a-d) are answered “Moderate to large impact may " | ~* occur”, continue with the following questions to help support conchusic.s in Part 3: | i. The proposed action may result in the destruciion or alteration of all or part E3e, E3g, im] imi : of the site or property. E3f ii. The proposed action may resuit in the alteration cf the property’ s setting or E3e, E3f, 0 q integrity. E3g, Ela, Elb iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which _| E3e, E3f, oO oO are out of character with the site or property, or may elter its setting. E3g, E3h,
The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a Piso C | YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted :
municipal open space plan.
' (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 12.
| Relevant No, or Mederate : Part I small to large | Question(s) impact impact may i . may occur occur | 3. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or “ecosystem: | D2e, Elb Oo im services”, provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater | E2h, storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, E20, E2n, E2p b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. | C2a, Elec, oO Oo i C2c, E2q c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c oO im} with few such resources. Elc, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c, Ele oO oO community as an open space resource.
e. Other impacts: : O oO
12, Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical xIro CT] YES | environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) | If “Yes”, answer questions a-c. if “No”, go io Section 13.
Relevant No, or Moderate
Part { small to large Question(s) impact impact may : mnay occur occur { , 4. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or E3d o o characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. :
i b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d o Oo ;___ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA.
c. Other impacts: Oo im
13, Impact on Transportation .
The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. [ino C} YES (See Part 1. D.2,j) .
If “Yes”, answer questions a - jf “No”, go to Section 14,
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. Dj Oo im} b, The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or | D2j im im more vehicles.
c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j o Oo d, The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. Dj Oo im) e. The proposed action may alter the present pattem of movement of people or goods. | D2j oO Oo
f. Other impacts: oO oO
The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. JXxo [_]ves (See Part 1. D.2.k)
if “Yes”, answer questions a-e. If “No”, go to Section 15.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Questicn(s) impact impact may may occur occur a, The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k O im} b, The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission | Dif, oO oO or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to servea | D1q, D2k commercial or industrial use.
c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k im] oO d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square | Dig oO 0 feet of building area when completed.
e. Other Impacts: g g
The proposed action may result in-an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. (Ino Jylves (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and 0.)
If “Yes”, answer questions a-f. If “No”, go to Section 16.
Relevant No, or Moderate Parti smail to large Question(s) impaci impact may . . may occur occur
a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m ‘4 Oo regulation, Eafly motniny 4 nd_lale Hig activi hy Stall ug
b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, Eid a oO hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home.
c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D20 el oO
d, The proposed action may vesull in light shiuing onto adivixing properties. bln Ci JK
e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing Dn, Ela p= ‘ oO area conditions. Smal l] my 7 £, Other impacts: oO Oo 16. Impact on Human Health . yt The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure ave | YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1.d. f. g. and h.) Sf “Yes”, answer questions a- m. If “No”, go to Section 17.
Relevant No,or Mederate ‘Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may ' may cccur occur Hl | a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day Eld Oo oO care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community.
b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. Elg, Elh oO | c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site | Elg,Elh oO oO remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. ; ‘ | 4. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the Elg, Elh Oo oO property (e.g., easement or deed restriction).
e, The proposed action may affect institutional contrcl measures that were pu‘ in place | Elg, Elh oO oO to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t o Oo generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be prctective of the environment and human health.
g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, Elf im} Oo management facility.
bh. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, Elf Oo oO i, The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of | D2r, D2s Oo oO solid waste.
j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of | Elf, Elg im] oO 2 site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Elh | k, The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases trom a landfill Elf, Elg im] 0 site to adjacent off site structures.
1, The proposed action may result in the release of contaminzted leachate from the D2s, Elf, q oO project site. D2r ra, Other impacts: : : cl gq
The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. Jxino [lves (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and €.3.) .
If Yes”, answer questions a-h. If “No”, go to Section 18.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur
a. The proposed action’s land use components may be different from, or in sharp C2, C3, Dla oO im contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). Ela, Elb
b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town.or village | C2 _ Oo. oO in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%,
c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 [ml oO
d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use | C2, C2 Oo oO plans.
e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3, Dic, oO Oo supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. Did, Dif,
Did, Elb
f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density devclopment | C4, D2c, D2d Oo 0 that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. Dj
g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or | C2a oO oO commercial development not included in the proposed action)
h. Other: oO oO
The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. [No elves (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3)
If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3.
Relevant No, or Moderate Part! small to large Question(s) impact impact may ; may occur occur a, The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas | E3e, E3f, E3g MM Oo of historic importance to the community.
b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 6 Oo schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where | C2, C3, D1f axe ma] there is a shortage of such housing. Dig, Ela d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized | C2, E3 ww oO or designated public resources.
e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2, C3 Oo A — f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 ps Qo . Lo. . Ela, Elb E2g, E2h
g. Other impacts: oO oO
PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10